Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 8;37(1):72. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-02965-1

Table 3.

Results of linear mixed model analysis comparing field tests

β (CI) p-value
Intercept 105.83 (101.04; 110.62) p < 0.001
Age -0.81 (-0.97; -0.66) p < 0.001
Age 60+ -0.94 (-1.35; -0.53) p < 0.001
Test
 HGS -5.45 (-10.83; -0.07) 0.047
 CMJ -0.31 (-5.69; 5.08) 0.911
 STSP -1.73 (-7.11; 3.66) 0.530
 MGS -5.66 (-11.05; -0.28) 0.039
 TUG -2.20 (-7.58; 3.66) 0.424
Age-by-test
 HGS 0.64 (0.47; 0.81) p < 0.001
 CMJ 0.12 (-0.06; 0.29) 0.185
 STSP 0.41 (0.24; 0.58) p < 0.001
 MGS 0.69 (0.52; 0.86) p < 0.001
 TUG 0.52 (0.35; 0.69) p < 0.001
Age 60+-by-test
 HGS 0.38 (-0.08; 0.84) 0.105
 CMJ 0.03 (-0.43; 0.49) 0.895
 STSP 0.50 (0.05; 0.96) 0.031
 MGS 0.11 (-0.35; 0.57) 0.640
 TUG 0.12 (-0.33; 0.58) 0.598

HGS = handgrip strength; CMJ = countermovement jump; STSP = sit-to-stand power; SCP = stair-climbing power; MGS = maximal gait speed; TUG = timed-up-and-go; β = regression coefficient; CI = confidence interval; Age = age (years); Age 60 + = age (years) – 60 (for age >60) or 0 (for age ≤60)