Table 2.
Results of risk of bias assessments for each included study generated using the Robvis tool.
| Study | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D6 | D7 | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malan-Muller et al. (2022) | HR | LR | SC | SC | LR | LR | LR | HR |
| Hemmings et al. (2017) | HR | LR | SC | SC | LR | SC | LR | HR |
| Bajaj et al. (2019) | HR | LR | SC | SC | LR | LR | LR | HR |
D1: Domain 1 – Risk of bias due to confounding. D2: Domain 2 – Risk of bias arising from measurement of the exposure. D3: Domain 3 – Risk of bias in selection of participants into the study (or into the analysis). D4: Domain 4 – Risk of bias due to post-exposure interventions. D5: Domain 5 – Risk of bias due to missing data. D6: Domain 6 – Risk of bias arising from measurement of the outcome. D7: Domain 7 – Risk of bias in selection of the reported result. LR – low risk of bias. SC – some concerns. HR – high risk of bias. VHR – very high risk of bias.