Upload additional files	DRR-202406-01-R02/stage_files/DRR-202406-01/Review MS/Ritter_et_al._2024_Gigabyte_reviewer_comments_8-23-24.docx
Reviewer name and names of any other individual's who aided in reviewer	Andrea Gschwend
Do you understand and agree to our policy of having open and named reviews, and having your review included with the published papers. (If no, please inform the editor that you cannot review this manuscript.)	Yes
Is the language of sufficient quality?	Yes
Please add additional comments on language quality to clarify if needed
Are all data available and do they match the descriptions in the paper?	No
Additional Comments	The supplementary files were not made available to me for review.
Are the data and metadata consistent with relevant minimum information or reporting standards? See GigaDB checklists for examples <a href="http://gigadb.org/site/guide" target="_blank">http://gigadb.org/site/guide</a>	Yes
Additional Comments
Is the data acquisition clear, complete and methodologically sound?	Yes
Additional Comments
Is there sufficient detail in the methods and data-processing steps to allow reproduction?	Yes
Additional Comments	I recommend including additional details for the programs used for the Rubired genome assembly and annotation in this manuscript, though.
Is there sufficient data validation and statistical analyses of data quality?	No
Additional Comments	It is unclear from the manuscript if the large Dakapo inversion was validated experimentally.
Is the validation suitable for this type of data?	Yes
Additional Comments
Is there sufficient information for others to reuse this dataset or integrate it with other data?	Yes
Additional Comments
Any Additional Overall Comments to the Author	Please see attached Word document
Recommendation	Major Revision