Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Mar 10;20(3):e0313571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313571

Role of vitamins in the pathogenesis and treatment of restless leg syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Xiao-Min Xu 1,2,*, Jiang-hai Ruan 1,2, Tao Tao 1,2, Shu-li Xiang 1,2, Ren-liang Meng 1,2, Xiu Chen 1,2,*
Editor: Dragan Hrncic3
PMCID: PMC11892881  PMID: 40063620

Abstract

We performed a meta-analysis to assess the role of vitamins in the possible pathogenesis and treatment of RLS (Restless Leg Syndrome). A systematic search of the PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted. Fifty-nine studies on the relationship between vitamins and RLS were included, as well as four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on vitamin treatment of RLS. Compared with non-RLS patients, serum vitamin D levels were significantly lower both in primary (P =  0.009) and secondary (P =  0.003) RLS patients, and appeared to be positively correlated with disease severity. Serum folate levels were lower in pregnant RLS patients than in pregnant non-RLS patients (P =  0.007), but this phenomenon was not seen in non-pregnant RLS patients (P =  0.65). Vitamin B12 (P =  0.59) and B1 (P =  0.362) deficiencies were not found in RLS patients. Oral vitamin B6 significantly improved primary RLS (P < 0.0001), while vitamin D did not (P =  0.05). Oral vitamin C (P < 0.00001), E (P < 0.0001), and vitamin C +  E (P < 0.00001) all significantly improved hemodialysis-associated RLS with equal efficacy. Vitamin C is equivalent to 0.18 mg of pramipexole for the treatment of RLS (P =  0.81). In this meta-analysis, low vitamin D levels were found in patients with RLS, low folate levels were associated with RLS only in pregnant women, and vitamin C/E/B6 may improved symptoms in patients with RLS. These results suggest that vitamin deficiency or insufficiency may be related to the pathogenesis of RLS.

Introduction

Restless leg syndrome (RLS) is a chronic neurosensorimotor disorder characterized by an irresistible urge to move the limbs, usually accompanied or caused by uncomfortable and unpleasant sensations, which occurs or worsens at rest and nighttime, and partially or completely relieved by movement [13]. The overall prevalence of RLS is about 7%, with 2.7% of the population having clinically significant RLS [4]. Genetic factors, dopaminergic dysfunction and brain iron deficiency are thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of RLS [2,5]. Primary RLS is often associated with familial inheritance and is thought to be related to genes such as Meis1 and BTBD9. Secondary RLS is commonly seen in patients with renal failure, iron deficiency anemia, pregnancy, neurodegenerative diseases, or specific drug use [6,7]. Symptoms mainly affect the legs, but in severe cases can extend to the upper limbs [7]. It severely affects patients’ sleep, induces emotional disorders, and reduces quality of life [68].

Vitamins are a class of organic substances necessary to maintain normal physiological functions of the human body, often a component of coenzymes, and play an indispensable role in the process of human growth, metabolism and development. Various clinical studies have investigated the relationship between vitamins and RLS, and the results showed that there are related changes in vitamin levels in patients with RLS, and supplementation of related vitamins can alleviate clinical symptoms. However, no meta-analysis or systematic reviews have been published discussing the role of vitamins in RLS. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the role of vitamins in the possible pathogenesis and treatment of RLS.

Methods

Data sources and search strategy

A systematic search of Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to January 2024 was conducted to search for matching trials. Keywords include such as ‘restless legs syndrome*’ and ‘vitamin*’, as detailed in the Supplemental Table 1. The search is performed using the following search keywords: “AND” and “OR” Boolean operators individually or in combination with one another. To avoid missing relevant controlled trials, the reference list of all relevant literature and relevant meeting abstracts were manually searched to further identify any potential studies eligible for inclusion. Only studies published in English were included. Search for all studies were conducted from January 10 to April 28, 2024. This systematic review was not registered in any database.

Study selection

Import all retrieved publications into the literature management software EndNote. First, duplicate articles found were excluded, then the remaining literature that did not meet the inclusion criteria was excluded by reading the title and abstract, and finally the full text of the remaining literature was read to decide whether to include in the final analysis.

Selection criteria

In order to comprehensively analyze the relationship between vitamins and RLS in existing studies, we intend to include all studies on the relationship between vitamin levels or vitamin intake and patients with RLS and the effects of vitamins on RLS,which we define as correlational studies and treatment studies, respectively.

Inclusion criteria for correlational studies: (i) clinical case-control trials or cross-sectional study or report; (ii) patients diagnosed with primary or secondary RLS, with no specific age limit; (iii) reported the association between vitamins and RLS, such as changes in vitamin levels in patients with RLS, or the relationship between vitamin intake and the onset of RLS; (iv) the main indicators can be obtained.

Inclusion criteria for treatment studies: (i) randomized controlled trials (RCTs); (ii) patients diagnosed with primary or secondary RLS, with no specific age or ethnic origin limit; (iii) vitamins taken as a treatment for RLS; if patients were also receiving a combination supplement of other nutrients and there was a control group in the study receiving the same other nutrients alone, we included them in the study as well; (iv) the main indicators can be obtained.

Exclusion criteria: (i) animal studies or in vitro studies; or (ii) reviews, case reports, dissertations, and duplicate analyses; or (iii) outcome data were incomplete or unavailable.

Data extraction

Two authors (XMX, JHR) independently screened the title and abstract of each paper to verify that the study meets the inclusion criteria, and then review and validate the full text of the potential paper. Four reviewers (XMX, JHR, TT, SLX) independently extracted data from eligible studies. The extracted data included first author’s name, publication date and country, RLS type, vitamin type, study design, study population, risk of bias, outcome data and associated factors. For correlational study, when the serum vitamin value is reported as nmol/L (pmol/L), we convert it to ng/mL (pg/ml), divided by the factor of 2.494 for 25-OH-VitD, 2.27 for folate, and 0.739 for vitamin B12. If any data could not be directly extracted, we chose to search associated conference summaries or other studies citing the RCT in question. Any disagreements regarding study inclusion and data extraction were resolved via discussion or following arbitration by the third reviewer (XC) if necessary.

Quality assessment

The methodological quality of trials was assessed using the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [9]. Assessment included seven domains of bias (random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting and other bias) on three grades(low, high, and unclear risk of bias).

The Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to estimate the quality of the included datasets for the case-control study and cross-sectional study [10]. This assessment included three domains: selection,comparability, and outcome. Datasets are categorized as high, moderate, and low quality if scores are ≥ 7, 4-6 and ≤ 3, respectively.

Each study was evaluated by two independent reviewers, any disagreements were resolved via discussion or following arbitration by the third reviewer (XC) if necessary.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.3 software (Cochrane Management System). Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs for dichotomous data. Heterogeneity was evaluated with I 2 statistics [9]. If a certain heterogeneity for outcome data was observed (I2 >  50% or P <  0.1), a random-effects model was chosen to calculate pooled estimates. Otherwise, a fixed effect model was chosen. Where possible, meta-analyses of the intention-to-treat population were performed. P <  0.05 was defined as significant for heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis were performed based on the RLS type and study type. Sensitivity analysis was performed for vitamin correlation analysis, and the overall effect size of vitamin and RLS was re-analyzed after excluding tests with NOS scores as unclear. Over ten studies were evaluated for publication bias using funnel plot regression method. And Egger’s tests were carried out in Stata version 18.0 statistics to confirm whether there is a small-study effect.

Results

Features of the included literature

An initial database search identified 1,746 articles (Pubmed: 147, Embase: 675; Cochrane: 397; Web of Science: 527), and a further four articles were identified through a manual search. Among them, 359 duplicate articles were eliminated by EndNote, 1391 by reading titles and abstracts, and 114 by reading the full text. Finally, 61 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. 57 articles focused on the relationship between vitamins and RLS [1169], and 4 randomized controlled trials focused on vitamin treatment of RLS [7073]. Fig 1 outlines the screening process. Table 1 and Table 2 shows the characteristics of the included studies.

Fig 1. Flowchart of study selection.

Fig 1

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of articles on the correlation between vitamin and RLS.

Study Location Study type RLS type Sample Technique Vitamin type Sample size(n) Female% Age
(mean)
Test group vs. Control group Quality
Botez 1977[43] Canada Cross-sectional Prepregnancy (RLS) Serum L.CASEI Folate 11 vs 10
9 vs 12
100% 29.19 Oral multivitamin with 0.5g folic acid vs. without 0.5g folic acid; RLS vs. without RLS unclear
O’Keeffe 1994[49] Dublin Case-control Primary RLS (mainly) Serum NR Vitamin B 12, Folate 18 vs 16 NR 81 (median) RLS vs. Controls Moderate
Lee 2001[44] USA Cross-sectional Prepregnancy (RLS) Serum NR Folate 7 vs 23 100% 31.6 Pregnancy with RLS vs. Pregnancy without RLS Moderate
Manconi 2004[61] Italy Cross-sectional Pregnancy (RLS) NA NA Folate 101 vs 445 100% 31.7 Pregnancy with new RLS vs. Pregnancy without RLS Moderate
Högl 2005[63] Italy Cross-sectional Primary RLS (mainly) Blood Standard
techniques
Vitamin B 12, Folate 74 vs 627 58.4% 65.7 RLS vs. Controls High
Kemlink 2007[50] Czech Republic Cross-sectional Familial + sporadic RLS Blood NR Vitamin B 12, Folate 43 vs 54
55 vs 92
NR NR Familial RLS vs. Sporadic RLS Moderate
Tunç 2007[64] Turkey Cross-sectional Pregnancy (RLS) Blood NR Vitamin B 12, Folate 38 vs 108 100% 24.81 Pregnancy with RLS vs. Pregnancy without RLS High
Manconi 2008[51] Italy Cross-sectional MS (RLS) Plasma NR Vitamin B 12, Folate 34 vs 220;
35 vs 220
NS 18-65 MS with RLS vs. MS without RLS Moderate
Aksu 2009[52] Turkey Cross-sectional Peritoneal dialysis (RLS) Blood NR Folate 13 vs 43 NS NS Peritoneal dialysis with RLS vs. Peritoneal dialysis without RLS Unclear
Kim 2010[65] Korea Cross-sectional Primary RLS (mainly) Blood NR Vitamin B 12, Folate 59 vs 655 57.8% 71.9 RLS vs. Non-RLS High
Suzuki 2011[62] Japan Cross-sectional Migraine (RLS) Blood Standard
clinical methods
Vitamin B1, B 12, Folate 31 vs 179 14–72 Migraine with RLS vs. Migraine without RLS Moderate
Balaban 2012[14] Turkey Case-control Primary RLS Serum ECLIA 25(OH)D 36 vs 38 74.3% 38.85 RLS vs. Healthy controls; Moderate
Civi 2012[59] Turkey Cross-sectional Primary RLS (mainly) Blood Standard
techniques
Vitamin B 12, Folate 53 vs 301 78.2% 29.8 RLS positive vs RLS negative Moderate
Naini 2012[53] Iran Cross-sectional Hemodialysis+Peritoneal dialysis (RLS) Blood NR Vitamin B 12, Folate 24 vs 66 41.1% 54.2 Hemodialysis with RLS vs. Hemodialysis without RLS Moderate
Gade 2013[54] Germany Case-control Hemodialysis (RLS) Serum Standard methods Folate 20 vs 26 69.6% 67 Hemodialysis with RLS vs. Hemodialysis without RLS Moderate
Oran 2014[21] Turkey Cross-sectional Primary RLS Plasma CMIA 25(OH)D 119 vs 36 90.3% 49.32 Vitamin D level < 20 ng/ml vs. Vitamin D level ≥ 20 ng/ml High
Cakmak 2015[55] Turkey Cross-sectional Primary RLS (mainly) Serum NR Vitamin B 12, Folate 169 vs 214 68.4% ≥20 RLS vs. Controls High
Çakır 2015[20] Turkey Cross-sectional Primary RLS Blood NR Vitamin D 57 vs 45 88.2% 50.53 Vitamin D level < 20 ng/ml (or with RLS) vs. Vitamin D level (or with RLS) ≥ 20 ng/ml Moderate
Cikrikcioglu 2016 [25] Turkey Case-control Primary +/ secondary(iron deficiency anemia) RLS Serum ELISA 25(OH)D3 78 vs 78 100% 45.7 RLS vs. Controls High
Demirci 2016[27] Turkey Cross-sectional AS (RLS) Blood NR Vitamin D, B12, Folate 39 vs 69 29.6% 39.5 AS with RLS vs. AS without RLS Moderate
Halac 2016[56] Turkey Case-control Primary+/secondary RLS(iron deficiency anemia) Blood NR Vitamin B 12, Folate 37 vs 38 100% 45.2 RLS vs. Controls Moderate
Helou 2016[67] Lebanon Cross-sectional Haemodialysis (RLS) Blood NR Vitamin C 20 vs 27 vs 30 NR ≥18 High vitamin C levels vs. Intermediate vitamin C levels vs. Low vitamin C levels Unclear
Santos 2016[30] Brazil Cross-sectional Hemodialysis (RLS) Serum Quimioluminescence 25(OH)D 10 vs 9 68.4% 48.0 Hemodialysis with RLS vs. Hemodialysis without RLS Moderate
Stefani 2016[41] Austria Case-control Primary RLS (mainly) Blood NR 25(OH)D 57 vs 57 NR NR RLS vs. Controls Unclear
Varım 2016[57] Turkey Case-control Primary RLS Blood NR Vitamin B 12, Folate 75 vs 56 73.3% 46.67 RLS vs. Controls Moderate
Minár 2017[30] Slovakia Cross-sectional MS (RLS) Blood NR Vitamin D, B12, Folate 52 vs.148 73.5% 39.7 MS with RLS vs. MS without RLS High
Morker 2017[47] USA Cross-sectional Prepregnancy (RLS) Serum NR Folate 20 vs 79 100% 34.12 Pregnancy with moderate or severe RLS vs. Pregnancy with mild or without RLS Moderate
Atar 2017 [23] Turkey Cross-sectional Primary RLS (mainly) Serum NR 25(OH)D3 88 vs 122 NR 10-16 Vitamin D deficient vs. Vitamin D insufficient and sufficient unclear
Neves 2017[13] Brazil Case-control Dialysis (RLS) Serum CLIA 25(OH)D 29 vs 72
16 vs 13
46.5% 45.57 Dialysis RLS vs. Dialysis control;
Severe/very severe RLS vs. Mild/moderate RLS
High
Stefani 2017[16] Austria Case-control Primary RLS (mainly) Blood NR Vitamin D 107 vs 107 NR NR RLS vs. Healthy controls Unclear
Becker 2018[58] Germany Cross-sectional Inflammatory bowel disease (RLS) Serum NR Folate 5 vs 26 71.0% ≥18 With folate deficiency vs. Fithout folate deficiency Moderate
Calviño 2018[31] Spain Cross-sectional Renal transplant (RLS) Serum NR 25(OH)D, B12,Folate 19 vs 106 36.8% 56.24 Renal transplant with RLS vs. Renal transplant without RLS High
Evans 2018[36] India Case-control Primary RLS Serum NR Vitamin D 12 vs 13
37 vs 28
NS 3–12 years RLS vs Controls;
Mixed (GP/RLS) vs GP
Moderate
Huzmeli 2018[26] Turkey Cross-sectional Hemodialysis (RLS) Blood NR 25(OH)D 33 vs 42 53.3% 57.8 Hemodialysis with RLS vs. Hemodialysis without RLS Moderate
Işıkay 2018[28] Turkey Cross-sectional Celiac disease (RLS) Serum NR 25(OH)D, B12, Folate 8 vs 218 46.9% 13.24 Celiac patients with RLS vs. Celiac patients without RLS Moderate
Wali 2018[12] Saudi Arabia Case-control Primary + secondary RLS Serum NR 25(OH)D, B12, Folate 78 vs 123
59 vs 19
50 vs 28
51.7% 44.38 RLS vs. Healthy controls; RLS with vitamin D deficient vs. RLS with vitamin D sufficient; primary RLS vs. secondary RLS High
Atalar 2019[22] Turkey Cross-sectional Primary RLS Serum ELISA 25(OH)D 89 vs 63 46.7% 46.13 RLS with 25 (OH) D < 20 ng/mL vs. RLS with 25 (OH) D ≥ 20ng/mL Moderate
Aynacı 2019[46] Turkey Cross-sectional Prepregnancy (RLS) NA NA Folate 258 vs 66 100% 29.18 Folate intake ≥  400 mcg/ day vs. Folate intake < 400 mcg/ day Moderate
Bener 2019[29] Turkey Cross-sectional T2DM (RLS) Blood NR Vitamin D 199 vs 672 64.4% 50.33 T2DM with RLS vs. T2DM without RLS Moderate
SÜnter 2019[42] Turkey Cross-sectional MS (RLS) Blood NR Vitamin D, B12 30 vs 63 72% 34.6 MS with RLS vs. MS without RLS Moderate
Tutuncu 2020[24] Turkey Cross-sectional primary RLS Serum ECLIA Vitamin D 21 vs 11 43.8% 45.06 RLS with vitamin D deficiency vs. RLS with normal vitamin D level Moderate
Almeneessier 2020[38] Saudi Arabia Cross-sectional Pregnancy (RLS) Serum NR 25(OH)D, Folate 519 vs 223 100% 29.2 Pregnancy with RLS vs. Pregnancy without RLS Moderate
Almeneessier 2020a [37] Saudi Arabia Cross-sectional Primary+secondary(anemia/DM/CKD)RLS Serum NR 25(OH)D 271 vs 865 100% 26.7 RLS vs. Controls Moderate
Çam 2020[66] Turkey Case-control Primary RLS Serum NR Vitamin B12 100 vs 106 85% 41.7 RLS vs. Controls Moderate
Jiménez 2020[15] Spain Case-control Primary RLS Serum ELISA 25(OH)D 111 vs 167 61.9% 58.45 RLS vs. Healthy controls Moderate
Sağlam 2020[18] Turkey Cross-sectional Pregnancy (RLS) Serum NR 25(OH)D 98 vs 47
57 vs 13
100% 27.36 Vitamin D level < 20 ng/ml(or with RLS) vs. Vitamin D level(or with RLS) ≥ 20ng/ml Moderate
Andréasson2021[60] Sweden Case-control PD (RLS) Serum NR Folate 21 vs 21 28.6% 69.3 PD with RLS vs. PD without RLS Moderate
Liu 2021[11] China Case-control Primary RLS Serum Magnetic particle CLIA 25(OH)D 57 vs 57
21 vs 36
46 vs 11
68.4% 57.62 RLS vs. Healthy controls;(Extremely) severe RLS vs. Mild-moderate RLS; RLS with vitamin D insufficient vs. RLS with vitamin D normal Moderate
Sarıcam 2021[39] Turkey Case-control Primary RLS (with/without migraine) Serum NR Vitamin D, B12 109 vs 105 71.5% 43.7 RLS (with/without migrain) vs. Controls Moderate
Sun 2021[17] China Case-control Primary RLS (including with migraine) Serum ECLIA 25(OH)D 49 vs 277 71.5% 40.9 RLS vs. Non-RLS control (including with migraine) Moderate
Yalcinkaya 2021[40] Turkey Cross-sectional MS (RLS) Serum NR 25(OH)D 11 vs 39 58% 17.3 MS with RLS vs. MS without RLS Moderate
Geng 2022 [45] china Case-control Primary RLS Plasma CMIA Vitamin B 12, Folate 80 vs 80 51.9% 50.42 Primary RLS vs. Healthy control High
Alnaaim 2023[35] Saudi Arabia Cross-sectional Pregnancy (RLS) Blood NA Vitamin D 122 vs 337 100% ≥18 Pregnancy with RLS vs. Pregnancy without RLS Moderate
Marano 2023[33] Italy Cross-sectional PD (RLS) Serum CLIA 25(OH)D 18 vs 32 34% 69.5(median) PD with RLS vs. PD without RLS Moderate
Miyazaki 2023[18] Japan Cross-sectional Pregnancy (RLS) Serum LC-MS/MS,CLEIA 25(OH)D, Folate 35 vs 168 100% 32 Pregnancy with RLS vs. Pregnancy without RLS High
Das 2023[34] Indian Cross-sectional CKD (RLS) Serum NR Vitamin D 11 vs 89 46% 51.6 CKD with RLS vs. CKD without RLS Moderate
Turan 2023[48] Turkey Cross-sectional Pregnancy (RLS) Serum NR Vitamin B 12, Folate 146 vs 354 100% 27.8 Pregnancy with RLS vs. Pregnancy without RLS Moderate

Abbreviations: RLS, restless leg syndrome; NR, not reported; NA, not applicable; MS, multiple sclerosis; ECLIA, electrochemi luminescence immunoassay; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxy vitamin D; CMIA, chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay; AS, ankylosing spondylitis; CLIA, chemiluminescent immunoassay; GP, growing pains; ELISA, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; T2DM, Type 2 diabetes mellitus; DM, Diabetes mellitus; CKD, Chronic kidney disease; PD, Parkinson’s disease; LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry.

Table 2. Clinical characteristics of the included trails on vitamin therapy for RLS.

Study Location Study design RLS type Intervention Duration Treatment group Intervention vs placebo(n) Female % Mean age Outcome Adverse effects (vitamins)
Jadidi 2023 [69] Iran Randomized, single-blind placebo-controlled Primary RLS Vitamin B6 (40 mg, pill, daily) 8 weeks VitaminB6 + Pramipexole vs. Magnesium oxide (250mg) + Pramipexole vs.Placebo+pramipexole 25 vs 25 vs 25 68% 40.07 IRLS score; PSQI score NR
Rafie 2016 [70] Iran Randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled Hemodialysis Vitamin C (250 mg, tablet, daily) 8 weeks Vitamin C vs. Placebo vs. Pramipexole (0.18 mg) 15 vs 15 vs 14 54.5% 56.07 IRLS score No
Sagheb 2012 [71] Iran Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Hemodialysis Vitamin C (200 mg,tablet,daily);Vitamin E(400mg,capsule,daily);Vitamin C+E 8 weeks Vitamins C +  E vs. Vitamin C + placebo vs. Vitamin E +  placebo vs. Double placebo 15 vs 15 vs 15 vs 15 58.3% 52.7 IRLS score Nausea, dyspepsia
Wali 2019 [68] Saudi Arabia Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Primary RLS Vitamin D (50,000 IU, caplets,weekly) 12 weeks Vitamin D vs. Placebo 17 vs 18 31.4% 42.55 IRLS score Abdominal pain,worsening of RLS symptoms

Abbreviations: RLS, restless leg syndrome; IRLS, International Restless Legs Scale; PSQI, Petersburg Sleep Quality Index.

Relationship between vitamins and RLS

Fifty-seven papers focused on the relationship between vitamins and RLS. These vitamins included vitamin D (n =  32), folate (n =  30), vitamin B12 (n =  24), vitamin B1 (n =  1), vitamin E (n =  1) and vitamin C (n =  1). Twenty-seven studies focused on primary RLS (mainly) and 30 studies focused on secondary RLS. Among the studies on secondary RLS, there were 12 studies on pregnancy with RLS and 8 studies on dialysis-related RLS.

Vitamin D.

Thirty-two studies have investigated the relationship between restless leg syndrome and vitamin D [1142], including four on dialysis RLS [13,26,30,34] and four on pregnancy-related RLS [18,19,35,38]. The pooled analyses showed that RLS patients had significantly lower levels of vitamin D than controls (MD =  -3.43; 95% CI =  -5.29 to -1.57, P =  0.0003; heterogeneity, I2 =  92%; P <  0.00001), whether primary (MD =  -5.41; 95% CI =  -9.48 to -1.34, P =  0.009; heterogeneity, I2 =  96%; P <  0.00001) or secondary RLS (MD = -1.98; 95% CI = -3.29 to -0.66, P =  0.003; heterogeneity, I2 =  65%; P =  0.0007) (Fig 2a), or in controlled (MD =  -5.00; 95% CI =  -8.77 to -1.23, P =  0.009; heterogeneity, I2 =  95%; P <  0.00001) or cross-sectional studies (MD =  -2.01; 95% CI =  -3.41 to -0.61, P =  0.005; heterogeneity, I2 =  68%; P =  0.0004) (Supplement Fig 1a); vitamin D deficiency/insufficient was detected in patients with RLS at a significantly higher rate than in controls without RLS (OR =  2.58; 95% CI =  1.87 to 3.56, P < 0.00001; heterogeneity, I2 =  62%; P =  0.002), whether primary (OR =  4.49; 95% CI =  2.12 to 9.52, P < 0.0001; heterogeneity, I2 =  78%; P =  0.0001) or secondary RLS (OR =  1.99; 95% CI =  1.61 to 2.46, P < 0.00001; heterogeneity, I2 =  0%; P =  0.91) (Fig 2b), or in controlled (OR =  4.90; 95% CI =  2.09 to 11.49, P =  0.003; heterogeneity, I2 =  74%; P =  0.0007) or cross-sectional studies (OR =  2.04; 95% CI =  1.72 to 2.42, P <  0.00001; heterogeneity, I2 =  0%; P =  0.90) (Supplement Fig 1b); and patients with severe RLS had lower vitamin D levels than those with mild-moderate RLS (MD =  -3.63; 95% CI =  -6.19 to -1.07, P =  0.005; heterogeneity, I2 =  0%; P =  0.42) (Fig 2c); RLS patients with deficient vitamin D levels (<20 ng/mL) had significantly higher IRLSSG scores than those with normal vitamin D levels (MD =  5.95; 95% CI =  0.75 to 11.14, P =  0.02; heterogeneity, I2 =  96%; P < 0.00001) (Fig 2d); participants with vitamin D deficiency had a higher proportion of RLS detected than participants with normal vitamin D levels (OR =  2.81; 95% CI = 1.87 to 4.24, P < 0.00001; heterogeneity, I2 =  27%; P =  0.25) (Fig 2e).

Fig 2. a. RLS patients had significantly lower levels of serum vitamin D than controls.

Fig 2

; b. The rate of serum vitamin D deficiency/insufficient in RLS patients was significantly higher than that in controls; c. Patients with severe RLS had lower vitamin D levels than those with mild-moderate RLS; d. RLS patients with deficient vitamin D levels had significantly higher IRLSSG scores than those with normal vitamin D levels; e. Participants with vitamin D deficiency had a higher proportion of RLS detected than participants with normal vitamin D levels; f. Dialysis patients with RLS had significantly lower levels of serum vitamin D than those without RLS.

For dialysis-related RLS, there was significant difference in vitamin D levels between dialysis patients with RLS and those without RLS (MD =  -4.88; 95% CI =  -9.13 to -0.64, P =  0.02; heterogeneity, I2 =  73%; P =  0.01) (Fig 2f); no significant difference in vitamin D levels between patients with severe/very severe RLS and mild/moderate RLS (MD =  -6.40; 95% CI =  -13.55 to 0.75, P =  0.08); no statistic difference in the detection rate of vitamin D deficiency ( < 30 ng/mL) between dialysis patients with RLS and those without RLS (OR =  2.29; 95% CI =  0.95 to 5.55, P =  0.07). For pregnant women, the serum 25(OH)D level in the RLS group was lower than that in the non-RLS group (MD =  -2.60; 95% CI =  -4.26 to -0.94, P =  0.002); pregnant women with vitamin D deficiency had a higher proportion of RLS detected than those with normal vitamin D levels (OR =  1.96; 95% CI =  1.45 to 2.65, P < 0.0001); and RLS patients with vitamin D deficiency had significantly higher IRLSSG scores than those with normal vitamin D levels (MD =  6.40; 95% CI =  2.40 to 10.40, P =  0.002). However, there were also results showing no difference in vitamin D deficiency rates between pregnant women with and without RLS (OR =  4.70; 95% CI =  0.27 to 82.15, P =  0.29). However, except for the results of changes in vitamin D levels in dialysis patients from four studies, the other results above are from the conclusions of only one study.

Folate.

Thirty articles examined the relationship between folate and RLS in patients [12,18,25,27,28,31,32,38,4364], and nine articles focused on pregnancy-related RLS [18,38,43,44,46,47,49,62,64]. Of these articles, twenty-five looked at folate levels in patients with RLS (6 articles focused on pregnancy-related RLS) [12,18,25,27,28,31,32,38,44,45,4754,5658,6062,64], four looked at the incidence of low folate in patients with RLS [18,5557], and two looked at the incidence of RLS in patients taking folate [43,46]. The overall pooled analysis of the 25 studies showed that folate levels were significantly lower in pregnancy RLS women than in healthy pregnancy controls (MD =  -5.30; 95% CI =  -9.11 to -1.48, P =  0.007; heterogeneity,I2 =  94%; P < 0.00001), while folate levels in non-pregnant RLS patients were not significantly different from controls (MD =  0.07; 95% CI =  -0.24 to 0.38, P =  0.65; heterogeneity, I 2 =  4%; P =  0.41) (Fig 3a). Subgroup analysis based on the type of study showed that folate levels were lower in RLS patients in the cross-sectional trial than in the control group (MD =  -2.15; 95% CI =  -3.75 to -0.55, P =  0.009; heterogeneity, I2 =  94%; P <  0.00001), but not in the case-control trial (MD =  0.15; 95% CI =  -0.56 to 0.86, P =  0.009; heterogeneity, I2 =  16%; P = 0.31) (Supplement Fig 1c). The rate of folate deficiency in pregnant (OR =  0.16; 95% CI =  0.02 to 1.26, P =  0.08; heterogeneity, I2 =  0%; P =  0.72) or non-pregnant (OR =  0.60; 95% CI =  0.11 to 3.31, P =  0.56; heterogeneity, I2 =  0%; P =  0.58) RLS patients was not different from that in the non-RLS controls (OR =  0.31; 95% CI =  0.09 to 1.12, P =  0.07; heterogeneity, I2 =  0%; P =  0.67) (Fig 3b). And pregnant participants with no (OR =  0.03; 95% CI =  0.00 to 0.33, P =  0.005) or insufficient folic acid intake (<400 mcg/ day) (OR =  0.55; 95% CI =  0.31 to 0.98, P =  0.04) had a higher incidence of RLS than those with adequate folic acid intake ( ≥ 400 mcg/ day). No difference in folate levels was found between sporadic and familial RLS (P =  0.48). Excluding articles that could not explicitly exclude women with a history of RLS prior to pregnancy, results from the three included studies showed no significant difference in the proportion (one study intake 0.5g/d folic acid, another one intake folic acid 0.8 mg/d +  vitaminB12 4 ug/d) (OR =  0.99; 95% CI =  0.49 to 2.00, P =  0.98) and duration (MD =  0.00; 95% CI =  -0.58 to 0.58, P =  1.00) of vitamin use before RLS occurred in pregnancy-related RLS patients compared with pregnant women without RLS.

Fig 3. a. Serum folate levels were significantly lower in pregnancy woman with RLS than those without RLS, while folate levels in non-pregnant RLS patients were not significantly different from controls.

Fig 3

; b. The rate of folate deficiency in pregnant or non-pregnant RLS patients was not different from that in the non-RLS controls; c. No statistical difference in serum vitamin B12 levels between patients with primary/secondary RLS and controls; d. No difference in the incidence of vitamin B12 deficiency between RLS patients and controls.

Vitamin B.

Twenty-one studies, including 1298 patients with RLS and 3629 controls, examined vitamin B12 levels and showed no statistical difference in vitamin B12 levels between patients with RLS and controls (MD =  -10.08; 95% CI =  -46.85 to 26.69, P =  0.59; heterogeneity, I2 =  89%; P < 0.00001), whether primary (MD =  -25.68; 95% CI =  -90.03 to 38.67, P =  0.43; heterogeneity, I2 =  95%; P < 0.00001) or secondary RLS (MD =  11.81; 95% CI =  -34.03 to 57.65, P =  0.61; heterogeneity, I2 =  89%; P < 0.00001) (Fig 3c), or in controlled (MD = -54.26; 95% CI =  -140.37 to 31.85, P =  0.22; heterogeneity, I2 =  96%; P < 0.00001) or cross-sectional studies(MD =  14.52; 95% CI =  -22.60 to 51.65, P =  0.44; heterogeneity, I2 =  87%; P < 0.00001) (Supplement Fig 1d) [25,27,28,31,35,39,42,45,48,49,51,53,5557,6266,74]. In addition, there was no difference in the incidence of low vitamin B12 levels between the RLS and control groups from the three studies [12,55,59] (OR =  1.35; 95% CI =  0.85 to 2.16, P =  0.20; heterogeneity, I2 =  0%; P =  0.71) (Fig 3d). One study involving vitamin B1 showed no difference in serum vitamin B1 levels between RLS patients and controls (P =  0.362) [62].

Vitamin C/E.

A conference paper described the relationship between vitamin C and the prevalence of RLS in dialysis patients [67]. The study included 77 adults who underwent hemodialysis for more than 6 months, 21 of whom had symptoms of RLS. It found that the incidence of RLS in dialysis patients was inversely proportional to vitamin C levels, but not related to vitamin E. Among them, the prevalence of RLS was zero in patients with high vitamin C level, 36.3% in patients with moderate vitamin C level, and 91.6% in patients with low vitamin C level (p =  0.041). This article was unable to obtain the definition of high or low vitamin C levels and the data related to vitamin E analysis.

Sensitivity analysis

After excluding trials with NOS score as unclear (Stefani 2017 D, Botez 1977 Folate, Aksu 2009 Folate), Pooled estimates of effect sizes confirmed that the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency/deficiency was higher in patients with primary RLS than in controls without RLS (OR =  4.20; 95% CI =  1.91 to9.22, P =  0.0004; heterogeneity, I2 =  81%; P < 0.0001) (Supplement Fig 2a), and that there was no difference in folate levels between non-pregnant RLS patients and controls (MD =  0.10; 95% CI =  -0.20 to 0.39, P =  0.52; heterogeneity, I2 =  0%; P =  0.46). The difference, however, was that folate levels in pregnant RLS women were lower than those in healthy pregnancy controls, but did not reach statistical significance (MD = -4.23; 95% CI =  -8.57 to 0.11, P =  0.06; heterogeneity, I2 =  94%; P < 0.00001) (Supplement Fig 2b).

Vitamin treatment for RLS

Four papers on vitamin therapy for RLS have been published so far [7073]. These vitamins include vitamin D, vitamin B6, vitamin C, vitamin E, and vitamin C +  vitamin E. Two studies were conducted in patients with primary RLS and two studies in patients with hemodialysis-associated RLS.

Vitamin D.

Although several articles have been published examining the relationship between vitamin D and RLS, only one RCT has examined the effect of vitamin D on RLS [70]. In this trial, 35 individuals with primary mild to moderate RLS were randomized to receive either vitamin D or placebo, but only 22 participants completed the 12-week study. Compared with placebo, vitamin D did not reduce patients’ RLS severity score (MD =  5.71; 95% CI =  0.12 to 11.30, P =  0.05) (Supplement Fig 3a) and remained true after data analysis was limited to RLS patients with vitamin D deficiency (MD =  7.99; 95% CI =  -0.48 to 16.46, P =  0.06) (Supplement Fig 3b). The article also examined changes in vitamin D levels during treatment, and found that patients’ restless leg symptoms did not decrease with significant increases in vitamin D levels. The study included a relatively small number of participants and did not provide information on whether patients were taking drugs such as pramipexole to treat RLS, as differences in these drugs between the two groups could have affected the trial results.

Vitamin B6.

A study published in 2023 explored the effect of vitamin B6 in alleviating the symptoms of restless legs syndrome [71]. The study showed that vitamin B6 significantly reduced IRLS scores and PSQI scores in RLS patients compared to placebo (IRLS scores: MD =  -7.48; 95% CI =  -11.19 to -3.77, P < 0.0001; PSQI scores: MD =  -5.28; 95% CI =  -6.91 to -3.65, P < 0.00001) (Supplement Fig 3c-d), comparable to magnesium oxide (IRLS scores: MD =  0.60; 95% CI =  -3.11 to 4.31, P =  0.75; PSQI scores: MD =  1.00; 95% CI =  -0.51 to 2.51, P =  0.20) (Supplement Fig 3e-f).

Vitamin C.

Two studies have explored the role of vitamin C in the treatment of RLS [72,73]. The pooled analyses showed that daily of vitamin C could significantly reduce IRLS scores in hemodialysis associated RLS patients compared to placebo (MD =  -7.60; 95% CI =  -9.70 to -5.50, P < 0.00001) (Supplement Fig 3g), comparable to pramipexole (0.18 mg) (MD =  0.59; 95% CI =  -4.18 to 5.36, P =  0.81) (Supplement Fig 3h).

Vitamin E.

Only one trial has examined the effect of vitamin E on RLS [73]. The trial showed that a daily vitamin E tablet significantly reduce symptoms in patients with hemodialysis associated RLS compared to a placebo (MD =  -7.00; 95% CI =  -10.39 to -3.61, P < 0.0001) (Supplement Fig 3i), and was equivalent to vitamin C (MD =  -0.10; 95% CI =  -3.62 to 3.42, P =  0.96) (Supplement Fig 3j).

Vitamin C + E.

In the study conducted by Sagheb et.al [73], hemodialysis patients with RLS were randomly allocated to receive vitamin C and placebo, vitamin E and placebo, vitamin C +  E, and double placebo for eight weeks. Compared with double placebo, vitamin C +  E significantly reduced IRLS scores in patients (MD =  -6.90; 95% CI =  -9.23 to -4.57, P < 0.00001) (Supplement Fig 3k), but was not better than vitamin E +  placebo(MD =  -0.20; 95% CI =  -4.25 to 3.85, P =  0.92) (Supplement Fig 3l) or vitamin C +  placebo(MD =  -0.30; 95% CI =  -3.51 to 2.91, P =  0.85) (Supplement Fig 3m).

Acceptability.

There was no statistical difference in discontinuation rates for any reason (p =  0.26) or for adverse events alone (p =  0.46) between the vitamin and control groups. Common adverse effects in the vitamin groups included nausea [73], dyspepsia [73], abdominal pain [70].

Quality assessment and publication bias

The majority of the studies were ranked as moderate quality based on the NOS (Supplemental Table 2), and most treatment trials were at low risk of bias according to the Cochrane risk bias methods (supplement Fig 4a.4b). We evaluated studies on vitamin D levels (Egger’s test P = 0.225), vitamin D deficiency/insufficient rate (Egger’s test P = 0.078), folate levels (Egger’s test P = 0.230), and vitamin B12 levels (Egger’s test P = 0.063) for publication bias and found that the inverted funnel plots of the outcome data in these studies were basically symmetric(supplement Fig 5a-d), and Egger’s test also confirms this.

Discussion

This meta-analysis provided an overview of the role of vitamins in RLS. Current research on vitamins related to RLS includes vitamins C, D, E, B1, B6, B12, and folate. Compared with non-RLS patients, serum vitamin D levels were significantly lower in both primary (P =  0.009) and secondary (P =  0.003) RLS patients, and appeared to be positively correlated with disease severity, with significantly higher rate of vitamin D deficiency/insufficient in RLS patients (P < 0.00001). Serum folate levels were lower in pregnant RLS patients than in pregnant non-RLS patients (P =  0.007), but this phenomenon was not seen in non-pregnant RLS patients (P =  0.65). Vitamin B12 (P =  0.59) and B1 (P =  0.362) deficiencies were not found in RLS patients. The incidence of RLS was inversely proportional to serum vitamin C and vitamin D levels and folate intake, but not to vitamin E levels. Oral vitamin B6 significantly improved primary RLS, while vitamin D did not. Oral vitamin C, E, and vitamin C +  E all significantly improved hemodialysis-associated RLS with equal efficacy. Vitamin C is equivalent to 0.18 mg of pramipexole for the treatment of RLS. But it should be noted that to date, only single studies assessing the effect of vitamin supplementation on RLS have been conducted, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about their effectiveness.

The dysfunction of dopamine system is a key factor in the pathogenesis of RLS, which may increase the output of sympathetic neurons by impairing the descending modulation of the spinal circuit, thus altering the afferent input activity from muscle fibers, resulting in limb discomfort in patients [14]. Typical symptoms of RLS occur at night, which may be related to dopamine’s circadian rhythm, which decreases at night and increases in the morning [68]. At the same time, serum iron levels have also been reported to drop by 50% during the night [44]. Iron is an essential element for the synthesis of dopamine, and reduced iron content in the thalamus, putamen, pallidum, and substantia nigra have been reported in RLS patients using magnetic resonance imaging phase analysis technology [21]. Therefore, the prevailing hypothesis is that RLS episodes may be the result of a variety of causes that impair iron homeostasis in the brain and thus interfere with dopamine synthesis [44,69].

Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin and its action is mediated by the vitamin D receptor (VDR) [12,75]. Expression of vitamin D3 receptor protein has been demonstrated in midbrain dopamine neurons and their striatal target neurons [12]. Our statistical results showed that low serum vitamin D levels were significantly associated with RLS, both primary and secondary, suggesting a likely causal relationship between vitamin D and the occurrence of RLS. It has previously been reported that a decrease in dopamine levels in neonatal rats deficient in vitamin D, which subsequently affected the animals’ behavior as adults, leading to increased locomotion [76]. Vitamin D has been found in vitro studies to increase the expression of tyrosine hydroxylase, a rate-limiting enzyme in dopamine synthesis, increasing the number of dopaminergic neurons [70,77], and increasing dopamine levels in the substantia nigra [70]. Previous studies have found that patients with iron deficiency anemia have low serum vitamin D levels [78], and patients with low ferritin concentration have low serum vitamin D concentration [22]. These associations may suggest that the interaction between low vitamin D and iron deficiency induces dysfunction of the dopaminergic system, thus inducing RLS. As can be seen, a decrease in vitamin D and the presence of iron deficiency anemia are often observed in women during pregnancy. The link between low vitamin D levels and RLS is well established, but the 12-week RCT of vitamin D for RLS did not show a positive result [70]. The possibility cannot be ruled out that the reasons are insufficient sample size included, the relatively short duration of treatment, and the dose and duration of vitamin D supplementation did not reach a level affecting the concentration of vitamin D in the brain. The role of vitamin D supplementation in the treatment of patients with RLS needs to be further clarified.

In patients with chronic renal insufficiency, antioxidant substances such as vitamin C and vitamin E decrease, while pro-oxidant activity increases, leading to increased oxidative stress. Hemodialysis may induce repeated oxidative stress responses mainly through membrane bioincompatibility and endotoxin challenge, aggravating the imbalance between pro-oxidation and antioxidant capacity [74]. Oxidative stress is thought to affect iron deposition, dopamine production, and thus promote RLS symptoms [4]. The results of the included literature found that the occurrence of RLS in dialysis patients may be related to the decrease of the antioxidant vitamin C level, but no association with vitamin E was found. Decreases in plasma vitamin C levels have been reported to be associated with short sleep [79], and it cannot be ruled out that further decreases in vitamin C levels are due to sleep loss associated with RLS. The role of vitamin C and vitamin E in reducing RLS symptoms may be due to their antioxidant properties, but the current findings do not suggest that combined supplementation of vitamins C and E is superior to taking them alone, although vitamin C may enhance the antioxidant function of vitamin E by regenerating a-tocopherol [73]. Previous in vitro studies have suggested that vitamin C and E can induce the production of tyrosine hydroxylase in neural cell lines and increase dopamine synthesis, and vitamin C can increase the absorption and utilization of iron, which may be other mechanisms by which these supplements are used to treat uremic RLS [73]. Anyway, the current results suggest that vitamin C and E as antioxidants are safe and effective for the treatment of dialysis-associated RLS in the short term.

The average prevalence of RLS in pregnant women is 21%, about 2-3 times that of non-pregnant women [48,80,81]. In our study, thirteen articles have explored the relationship between vitamins and pregnancy-related restless leg syndrome, nine of which involved folate and four involved vitamin D. The results showed that the folate level of pregnancy-related RLS women was significantly lower than that of healthy pregnancy control group, but it was not found in non-pregnancy patients. The incidence of RLS in pregnant women with no folic acid intake or insufficient folic acid intake was higher than that in pregnant women with adequate folic acid intake ( ≥ 400 mcg/ day). Tetrahydrobiopterin is involved in dopamine synthesis as a cofactor of enzyme tyrosine hydroxylase, while folate plays a vital role in the regeneration of tetrahydrobiopterin [81]. If folate is reduced, dopamine synthesis may be restricted, contributing to the development of RLS. During pregnancy, levels of folate, iron, and ferritin often decrease due to the dilution of blood components, but not all pregnant women develop RLS during pregnancy, so it appears that susceptibility to RLS may be influenced or even determined by genetic background [81]. Studies have shown that familial RLS is more common in pregnant women with RLS than those without RLS, as well as other secondary RLS [80]. Our study showed that folate levels were significantly lower in patients with pregnancy-associated RLS compared to healthy pregnancy controls, but were not found to reach statistical significance after sensitivity analysis. Further large sample studies may be needed to verify this, and whether further declines in folate levels in pregnant women may be related to familial RLS requires further research.

The B vitamins are water-soluble vitamins that play an important role in cell metabolism. The RLS related B vitamins in this article include vitamin B1, B6 and B12. The results showed that vitamin B1 (P =  0.362) or B12 (P =  0.59) levels in RLS patients were not statistically different from those in the control group, and there were no controlled trials of vitamin B1 and B12 treatment for RLS; vitamin B6 significantly reduced IRLS score (P <  0.00001) and PSQI score (P =  0.20) in patients with RLS, but there is no literature to detect its change in RLS patients. For the effects of vitamin B6 in RLS, there is evidence that in addition to reducing plasma homocysteine, which is toxic to dopaminergic neurons, vitamin B6 has an antioxidant effect and thus a neuroprotective effect. Vitamin B6, on the other hand, is a cofactor of dopa carboxylase, an enzyme required for the conversion of levodopa into dopamine, which plays a key role in the synthesis of dopamine [82]. Previous studies also confirmed that the level of dopamine in the striatum corpus striatum of vitamin B6 deficient rats was significantly reduced [83] and the release time of dopamine into synapses was prolonged [84]. Therefore, vitamin B6 supplementation may improve the symptoms of RLS by improving dopamine, reducing homocysteine and antioxidant effects. Given the limited literature included in the study, the role of B vitamins in RLS remains to be defined.

Our article has several limitations. First, in the analysis of the association between vitamins and RLS, the existing studies included case-control and cross-sectional studies, but no cohort studies were found. Therefore, this analysis can only provide a possible correlation between vitamins and restless leg syndrome, and cannot determine a causal relationship between risk factors and restless leg syndrome, which is the inevitable limitation of conducting a meta-analysis based on the current research status. Second, due to the diversity of samples and sampling methods, differences in age and sex of participants, diversity of specimen testing methods, and various potential confounding factors, we obtained results with a high degree of heterogeneity, although subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses have been performed to look for or reduce heterogeneity. Third, there are generally few articles on vitamin treatment of RLS, each vitamin may involve only one or two studies, and the sample size of the included studies is small, and the follow-up time is relatively short. Based on the limited overall data available, the effectiveness and long-term effects of vitamins for the treatment of RLS cannot be well evaluated and determined.

Conclusion

In this meta-analysis, low vitamin D levels were consistently found in patients with RLS, while low folate levels were observed specifically in pregnant women with RLS. In addition, based on limited data, vitamins C, E, and B6 may improved symptoms in patients with RLS. These results suggest that vitamin deficiency or insufficiency, particularly in vitamin D and folate, may be related to the pathogenesis of RLS. Considering that vitamin deficiency is a preventable and treatable disease, prospective cohort studies are warranted to determine the causal relationship with the onset of RLS and to further elucidate the mechanism of vitamins in RLS. The current preliminary data on vitamin therapy for RLS are promising, but further robust randomized controlled trials may be needed to validate their efficacy for RLS before these approaches can be routinely used for RLS.

Supporting Information

Supplement Fig 1. Subgroup analysis based on the study type. a. Vitamin D levels.

b. Rate of vitamin D deficiency/insufficient. c. Folate levels. d. Vitamin B12.

(TIF)

pone.0313571.s001.tif (1.6MB, tif)
Supplement Fig 2. Sensitivity analyses after excluding trials with NOS score as unclear. a.

Rate of vitamin D deficiency/insufficient. b. Folate levels.

(TIF)

pone.0313571.s002.tif (1.2MB, tif)
Supplement Fig 3. a-b.

Vitamin D did not reduce patients’ RLS severity score compared to placebo, regardless of vitamin D deficiency; c-f. Vitamin B6 significantly reduced RLS patients’ IRLS scores and PSQI scores compared to placebo, and was comparable to magnesium oxide; g-h. Oral vitamin C could significantly reduce IRLS scores in hemodialysis associated RLS patients compared to placebo, and was comparable to pramipexole; i-j. Oral vitamin E could significantly reduce IRLS scores in hemodialysis associated RLS patients compared to placebo, and was equivalent to vitamin C; k-m. Oral vitamin C +  E significantly reduced IRLS scores in hemodialysis associated patient compared with double placebo, but was not better than vitamin E +  placebo or vitamin C +  placebo.

(TIF)

pone.0313571.s003.tif (734.3KB, tif)
Supplement Fig 4a. ‘Risk of bias’ summary: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trials.

b.‘Risk of bias’ graph: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included trials, with the majority of treatment trials having a low risk of bias.

(TIF)

pone.0313571.s004.tif (51.2KB, tif)
Supplemental Table 1. Results of the systematic search strategy.

(DOCX)

pone.0313571.s005.docx (14.8KB, docx)
Supplemental Table 2. Results of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale assessment.

(DOCX)

pone.0313571.s006.docx (34.9KB, docx)
Supplemental Table 3. Details of the information and data extracted from each study.

(XLSX)

pone.0313571.s007.xlsx (41KB, xlsx)
Supplemental Table 4. Numbering table of all 1391 studies identified in the literature search and reasons for inclusion and exclusion.

(DOCX)

pone.0313571.s008.docx (294.9KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

Xiu Chen and Xiao-min Xu are co-corresponding authors.

Abbreviations

RLS

Restless leg syndrome

RCTs

Randomized controlled trials

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings

NOS

Newcastle Ottawa scale

MDs

Mean differences

CIs

Confidence intervals

ORs

Odds ratios

IRLS

International Restless Legs Scale

PSQI

Petersburg Sleep Quality Index.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.de Biase S, Pellitteri G, Gigli GL, Valente M. Advancing synthetic therapies for the treatment of restless legs syndrome. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019;20(16):1971–80. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1654997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Amir A, Masterson RM, Halim A, Nava A. Restless leg syndrome: pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, and treatment. Pain Med. 2022;23(5):1032–5. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Marshall NS, Serinel Y, Killick R, Child JM, Raisin I, Berry CM, et al. Magnesium supplementation for the treatment of restless legs syndrome and periodic limb movement disorder: A systematic review. Sleep Med Rev. 2019;48:101218. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.101218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mansourian M, Rafie N, Khorvash F, Hadi A, Arab A. Are serum vitamin D, calcium and phosphorous associated with restless leg syndrome? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med. 2020;75:326–34. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2020.08.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.DelRosso L, Bruni O. Treatment of pediatric restless legs syndrome. Adv Pharmacol. 2019;84:237–53. doi: 10.1016/bs.apha.2018.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tang M, Ge J, Sun K-X, Cui B, Guan Y, Wang J-W. A network meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of drugs for restless legs syndrome in dialysis patients. Semin Dial. 2022;35(4):293–306. doi: 10.1111/sdi.13021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhou X, Du J, Liang Y, Dai C, Zhao L, Liu X, et al. The efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for restless legs syndrome: Systemic review and network meta-analysis. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:751643. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.751643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xu X-M, Liu Y, Jia S-Y, Dong M-X, Cao D, Wei Y-D. Complementary and alternative therapies for restless legs syndrome: An evidence-based systematic review. Sleep Med Rev. 2018;38:158–67. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2017.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. 2011.
  • 10.Wells G, Shea B, O’connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2000.
  • 11.Liu HM, Chu M, Liu CF, Zhang T, Gu P. Analysis of serum vitamin D Level and related factors in patients with restless legs syndrome. Front Neurol. 2021;12:782565. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.782565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wali S, Alsafadi S, Abaalkhail B, Ramadan I, Abulhamail B, Kousa M, et al. The Association between vitamin D level and restless legs syndrome: A population-based case-control study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2018;14(4):557–64. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Neves PDMM, Graciolli FG, Oliveira IB, Bridi RA, Moysés RMA, Elias RM. Effect of mineral and bone metabolism on restless legs syndrome in hemodialysis patients. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13(1):89–94. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Balaban H, Yıldız ÖK, Çil G, Şentürk İA, Erselcan T, Bolayır E, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in restless legs syndrome patients. Sleep Med. 2012;13(7):953–7. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2012.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jiménez-Jiménez FJ, Amo G, Alonso-Navarro H, Calleja M, Díez-Fairén M, Álvarez-Fernández I, et al. Serum vitamin D, vitamin D receptor and binding protein genes polymorphisms in restless legs syndrome. J Neurol. 2021;268(4):1461–72. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10312-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stefani A, Mitterling T, Weiss G, et al. Vitamin D in a large sample of patients with restless legs syndrome: A case control study. European Journal of Neurology. 2017;24:77. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sun S, Liu C, Jia Y, Wu J, Li H, Li X, et al. Association Between migraine complicated with restless legs syndrome and vitamin D. Front Neurol. 2021;12:777721. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.777721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Miyazaki A, Takahashi M, Shuo T, Eto H, Kondo H. Determination of optimal 25-hydroxyvitamin D cutoff values for the evaluation of restless legs syndrome among pregnant women. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(1):73–83. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sağlam G, Pektaş G, Karakullukçu S, Pektaş BA, Sağlam Aykut D. The relationship between vitamin D deficiency and restless legs syndrome in pregnancy. jtsm. 2020;7(2):44–8. doi: 10.4274/jtsm.galenos.2020.14633 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Çakır T, Doğan G, Subaşı V, Filiz MB, Ülker N, Doğan ŞK, et al. An evaluation of sleep quality and the prevalence of restless leg syndrome in vitamin D deficiency. Acta Neurol Belg. 2015;115(4):623–7. doi: 10.1007/s13760-015-0474-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Oran M, Unsal C, Albayrak Y, Tulubas F, Oguz K, Avci O, et al. Possible association between vitamin D deficiency and restless legs syndrome. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:953–8. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S63599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Çimen Atalar A. The relationship between 25 (OH) Vitamin D level and the severity of disease and sleep quality in restless legs syndrome. tnd. 2019;25(2):87–91. doi: 10.4274/tnd.2019.25478 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Atar M, Demirel S, Baran R. Assessment of restless legs syndrome development and poor sleep quality in non-anemic children with vitamin D deficiency. Hormone Research in Paediatrics. 2017;88:95. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tutuncu M, Tutuncu M. The effect of vitamin D on restless legs syndrome: prospective self-controlled case study. Sleep Breath. 2020;24(3):1101–6. doi: 10.1007/s11325-019-01984-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cikrikcioglu MA, Sekin Y, Halac G, Kilic E, Kesgin S, Aydin S, et al. Reduced bone resorption and increased bone mineral density in women with restless legs syndrome. Neurology. 2016;86(13):1235–41. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hüzmeli C, Candan F, Timucin M. The relationship between restless leg syndrome and 25-hydroxy D vitamin in hemodialysis patients. J Clin Anal Med. 2018;9(1):65–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Demirci S, Demirci K, Doğru A, İnal EE, Koyuncuoğlu HR, Şahin M. Restless legs syndrome is associated with poor sleep quality and quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a questionnaire-based study. Acta Neurol Belg. 2016;116(3):329–36. doi: 10.1007/s13760-015-0564-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Işıkay S, Işıkay N, Per H, Çarman KB, Kocamaz H. Restless leg syndrome in children with celiac disease. Turk J Pediatr. 2018;60(1):70–5. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2018.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bener A, Al-Hamaq AOAA, Ağan AF, Öztürk M, Ömer A. The prevalence of restless legs syndrome and comorbid condition among patient with type 2 diabetic mellitus visiting primary healthcare. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(12):3814–20. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_463_19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Santos RSS, Coelho FMS, da Silva BC, Graciolli FG, Dominguez WV, de Menezes Montenegro FL, et al. Parathyroidectomy improves restless leg syndrome in patients on hemodialysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Calviño J, Cigarrán S, Gonzalez-Tabares L, Guijarro M, Millán B, Cobelo C, et al. Restless legs syndrome: an unresolved uremic disorder after renal transplantation. Nephron. 2018;139(1):23–9. doi: 10.1159/000486401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Minár M, Petrleničová D, Valkovič P. Higher prevalence of restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease in multiple sclerosis patients is related to spinal cord lesions. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017;12:54–8. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.12.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Marano M, Pozzilli V, Magliozzi A, Tabacco G, Naciu AM, Palermo A, et al. Leg restlessness and hyperparathyroidism in Parkinson’s disease, a further clue to RLS pathogenesis?. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1113913. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1113913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Das S, Chatterjee N, Mandal A. A study on restless legs syndrome in patients with chronic kidney disease in a tertiary care hospital. J Indian Med Assoc. 2023;121(12):37–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Alnaaim S, Alghirash F, Alenzi A, Owaidh Abu Zahirah M, Tashari T, Hakami F, et al. The prevalence of restless legs syndrome among pregnant women in Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e42883. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Evans AM, Berde T, Karimi L, Ranade P, Shah N, Khubchandani R. Correlates and predictors of paediatric leg pain: A case-control study. Rheumatol Int. 2018;38(7):1251–8. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4056-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Almeneessier AS, Alzahrani M, Alsafi A, Alotaibi R, Olaish AH, BaHammam AS. Prevalence and predictors of restless legs syndrome in non-pregnant Saudi women of childbearing age. Sleep Breath. 2020;24(3):1107–13. doi: 10.1007/s11325-020-02054-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Almeneessie AS, Alyousefi N, Alzahrani M, Alsafi A, Alotaibi R, Olaish AH, et al. Prevalence of restless legs syndrome among pregnant women: A case-control study. Ann Thorac Med. 2020;15(1):9–14. doi: 10.4103/atm.ATM_206_19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Saricam G, Saricam O. Restless leg syndrome and migraine: Is there a common etiology?. NeuroAsia. 2021;26(4):743–9. doi: 10.54029/2021esm [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yalcinkaya BC, Amirov CB, Saltik S, Senel GB. Restless legs syndrome in pediatric onset multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021;56:103295. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stefani A, Mitterling T, Weiss G, et al. Does vitamin D play a role in restless legs syndrome/Willis Ekbom disease?. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23:51. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.SÜnter G, KilinÇ Ö, Berk A, AkÇabey S, SaldÜz E, ÖztÜrkÇÜ H, et al. Restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease in multiple sclerosis patients with spinal cord lesions. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2019;57(4):299–302. doi: 10.29399/npa.23351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Botez MI, Lambert B. Folate deficiency and restless-legs syndrome in pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1977;297(12):670. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197709222971220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee KA, Zaffke ME, Baratte-Beebe K. Restless legs syndrome and sleep disturbance during pregnancy: The role of folate and iron. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001;10(4):335–41. doi: 10.1089/152460901750269652 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Geng C, Yang Z, Xu P, Zhang H. Possible association between vitamin B12 deficiency and restless legs syndrome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022;223:107477. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Aynaci G, Guksu Z. The effects of dietary folate and iron supplementation on restless legs and preeclampsia in pregnancy. Progress in Nutrition. 2019;21(2):398–405. doi: 10.23751/pn.v21i2.8215 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Morker M, Gossett D, McKnight T. Serum folic acid level and its relationship to gestational willis ekbom disease (Restless legs syndrome): A pilot study. J Reprod Med. 2017;62(6):593–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Turan H, Aşkın Turan S, Butun Z, Kayapınar M. The prevalence, severity, and predictive factors of restless legs syndrome in pregnancy. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e44884. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.O’Keeffe ST, Gavin K, Lavan JN. Iron status and restless legs syndrome in the elderly. Age Ageing. 1994;23(3):200–3. doi: 10.1093/ageing/23.3.200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kemlink D, Sonka K, Pretl M, Benakova H. Suggestive evidence of erythropoietin level abnormality in patients with sporadic and familial cases of the restless legs syndrome. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2007;28(5):643–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Italian REMS Study Group, Manconi M, Ferini-Strambi L, Filippi M, Bonanni E, Iudice A, et al. Multicenter case-control study on restless legs syndrome in multiple sclerosis: the REMS study. Sleep. 2008;31(7):944–52. doi: 10.5665/sleep/31.7.944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Aksu M, Ismailogullari S, Korkmaz B, Korkmaz S, Kocyigit M. P3.200 Restless legs syndrome in chronic renal failure patients under continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 2009;15:S199. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8020(09)70764-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Naini A, Masoumi M, Mortazavi M. Restless legs syndrome in patients on maintenance hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Res Sci. 2012;17(SUPPL.2):S264–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gade K, Blaschke S, Rodenbeck A, Becker A, Anderson-Schmidt H, Cohrs S. Uremic restless legs syndrome (RLS) and sleep quality in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis: potential role of homocysteine and parathyroid hormone. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2013;37(4–5):458–63. doi: 10.1159/000355727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Altunayoglu Cakmak V, Koc B, Nuhoglu I, Topbas M, Ucuncu SY, Deger O, et al. Prevalence of restless legs syndrome in Trabzon in the northeast Black Sea Region of Turkey: Co-morbidities, socioeconomic factors and biochemical parameters. Neurol Res. 2015;37(9):751–62. doi: 10.1179/1743132815Y.0000000058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Halac G, Kilic E, Cikrikcioglu MA, Celik K, Toprak-Erek A, Keskin S, et al. Serum soluble lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 levels in patients with restless legs syndrome. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2016;117(6):316–20. doi: 10.4149/bll_2016_063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Varım C, Acar BA, Uyanık MS, Acar T, Alagoz N, Nalbant A, et al. Association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, a new marker of systemic inflammation, and restless legs syndrome. Singapore Med J. 2016;57(9):514–6. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Becker J, Berger F, Schindlbeck KA, Poddubnyy D, Koch PM, Preiß JC, et al. Restless legs syndrome is a relevant comorbidity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33(7):955–62. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3032-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Civi S, Kutlu R, Tokgoz S. Frequency, severity and risk factors for restless legs syndrome in healthcare personnel. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2012;17(3):230–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Andréasson M, Lagali N, Badian RA, Utheim TP, Scarpa F, Colonna A, et al. Parkinson’s disease with restless legs syndrome-an in vivo corneal confocal microscopy study. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2021;7(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s41531-020-00148-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Manconi M, Govoni V, De Vito A, Economou NT, Cesnik E, Casetta I, et al. Restless legs syndrome and pregnancy. Neurology. 2004;63(6):1065–9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000138427.83574.a6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Suzuki S, Suzuki K, Miyamoto M, Miyamoto T, Watanabe Y, Takashima R, et al. Evaluation of contributing factors to restless legs syndrome in migraine patients. J Neurol. 2011;258(11):2026–35. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6064-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Högl B, Kiechl S, Willeit J, Saletu M, Frauscher B, Seppi K, et al. Restless legs syndrome: A community-based study of prevalence, severity, and risk factors. Neurology. 2005;64(11):1920–4. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000163996.64461.A3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tunç T, Karadağ YS, Doğulu F, Inan LE. Predisposing factors of restless legs syndrome in pregnancy. Mov Disord. 2007;22(5):627–31. doi: 10.1002/mds.21291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kim KW, Yoon I-Y, Chung S, Shin Y-K, Lee SB, Choi EA, et al. Prevalence, comorbidities and risk factors of restless legs syndrome in the Korean elderly population - results from the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging. J Sleep Res. 2010;19(1 Pt 1):87–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2009.00739.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Çam M, Kutluana U. Evaluation of upper endoscopic findings in patients with restless legs syndrome and gastric complaints. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2020;78(4):217–23. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20190192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Helou J, Sarkis E, Khneisser E. Clinico-biological characteristics in restless legs syndrome in a population of haemodialysis patients-role of vitamin C deficiency. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23:744.26782789 [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Allen RP. Restless leg syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease pathophysiology. Sleep Med Clin. 2015;10(3):207–14, xi. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2015.05.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Buratti L, Luconi MP, Viticchi G, Provinciali L, Silvestrini M. Vitamin D supplementation: a useful strategy for restless legs syndrome exacerbation in a patient with Turner syndrome. Neurol Sci. 2017;38(6):1135–6. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-2870-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wali SO, Abaalkhail B, Alhejaili F, Pandi-Perumal SR. Efficacy of vitamin D replacement therapy in restless legs syndrome: a randomized control trial. Sleep Breath. 2019;23(2):595–601. doi: 10.1007/s11325-018-1751-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Jadidi A, Rezaei Ashtiani A, Khanmohamadi Hezaveh A, Aghaepour SM. Therapeutic effects of magnesium and vitamin B6 in alleviating the symptoms of restless legs syndrome: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022;23(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12906-022-03814-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Rafie S, Jafari M. A comparative study on the effects of vitamin C and Pramipexole on restless legs syndrome treatment in hemodialysis patients: A randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Allied Sciences. 2016;5(2):128–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sagheb MM, Dormanesh B, Fallahzadeh MK, Akbari H, Sohrabi Nazari S, Heydari ST, et al. Efficacy of vitamins C, E, and their combination for treatment of restless legs syndrome in hemodialysis patients: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Sleep Med. 2012;13(5):542–5. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2011.11.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Locatelli F, Canaud B, Eckardt K-U, Stenvinkel P, Wanner C, Zoccali C. Oxidative stress in end-stage renal disease: An emerging threat to patient outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003;18(7):1272–80. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfg074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Prono F, Bernardi K, Ferri R, Bruni O. The role of vitamin D in sleep disorders of children and adolescents: A systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3):1430. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Cederberg KLJ, Silvestri R, Walters AS. Vitamin D and restless legs syndrome: A review of current literature. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2023;13:12. doi: 10.5334/tohm.741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Jiménez-Jiménez FJ, García-Martín E, Alonso-Navarro H, Martínez C, Zurdo M, Turpín-Fenoll L, et al. Association between vitamin D receptor rs731236 (Taq1) polymorphism and risk for restless legs syndrome in the Spanish Caucasian population. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(47):e2125. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Heldenberg D, Tenenbaum G, Weisman Y. Effect of iron on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;56(3):533–6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/56.3.533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Otocka-Kmiecik A, Król A. The role of vitamin C in two distinct physiological states: Physical activity and sleep. Nutrients. 2020;12(12):3908. doi: 10.3390/nu12123908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Garbazza C, Manconi M. Management strategies for restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease during pregnancy. Sleep Med Clin. 2018;13(3):335–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2018.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mendes A, Silva V. Possible etiologies of restless legs syndrome in pregnancy: a narrative review. Sleep Sci. 2022;15(4):471–9. doi: 10.5935/1984-0063.20220080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.de Lau LML, Koudstaal PJ, Witteman JCM, Hofman A, Breteler MMB. Dietary folate, vitamin B12, and vitamin B6 and the risk of Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2006;67(2):315–8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000225050.57553.6d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Guilarte TR. Effect of vitamin B-6 nutrition on the levels of dopamine, dopamine metabolites, dopa decarboxylase activity, tyrosine, and GABA in the developing rat corpus striatum. Neurochem Res. 1989;14(6):571–8. doi: 10.1007/BF00964920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Tang F-I, Wei I-L. Vitamin B-6 deficiency prolongs the time course of evoked dopamine release from rat striatum. J Nutr. 2004;134(12):3350–4. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.12.3350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Dragan Hrncic

13 Aug 2024

PONE-D-24-27764Role of vitamin in the pathogenesis and treatment of restless leg syndrome: A meta-analysisPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Xu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: - as you will see from the comments of our expert reviewers, your manuscript is of interest focusing important question. However, reviewers identified several aspects that should be improved. Please apply all the standards for this type of the submission as advised by the reviewers. Please do follow very constructive directions of the reviewers. 

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 27 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Prof. Dr. Dragan Hrncic, MD, PhD 

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for the opportunity to review the paper entitled "Role of vitamin in the pathogenesis and treatment of restless leg syndrome: A meta-analysis". Please find below my comments on the submitted manuscript:

All abbreviations used in the abstract require an explanation upon their first occurrence.

Gene names should be written in italics.

The search strategy should be provided separately for each database.

In the inclusion criteria, please clarify whether it refers to the relationship between RLS and vitamin concentrations in blood or intake from the diet.

Were no additional criteria applied regarding the age of the study population, ethnic origin, or duration of the intervention (related to RCT)? Should studies in which patients received co-supplementation of other nutrients be included in the analysis? Should articles published only in the form of conference reports also be included in this systematic review?

Please also conduct a sensitivity analysis.

Please provide the results for the Q and I² statistics. Were funnel plots generated and were results for Begg’s and Egger’s tests calculated?

Was the study protocol registered in any database? If not, this information should be included in the manuscript.

Please present Figure 1 using the PRISMA flowchart.

Figures presenting meta-analysis results are of very poor quality and are illegible.

In the case of vitamin D, please specify which form of this vitamin was assessed. Was it 25(OH)D3?

Please provide information in a table on the material (serum or plasma) in which the concentration of individual vitamins was measured and the technique/method used for the measurement of vitamin levels in each study.

The description of RCT study results is too broad. It is not necessary to describe them in detail in the text since their characteristics are presented in the table.

Is the vitamin dose given in Table 2 a daily dose? Please add information to the table on the form in which the vitamins were administered (tablets, capsules, drops).

Results for all outcomes from RCT studies and vitamin concentrations obtained in individual studies should be presented in a supplementary table.

Please add the overall risk of bias to Supplementary Figure 1. In addition to the traffic-light plot of the risk of bias, please also include a summary plot of the risk of bias.

Please present the results of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale assessment in a table.

In the first paragraph of the discussion, it should be noted that to date, only single studies assessing the effect of vitamin supplementation on RLS have been conducted, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about their effectiveness.

The conclusions also need to be revised: Which results indicate the role of vitamins in the pathogenesis of RLS? No causal relationship was assessed in this study. Similarly, in my opinion, the title of the publication requires correction.

Reviewer #2: I appreciate the submission of your manuscript. I want to express my gratitude to the authors for their significant contributions to this study. However, there are still some issues that need to be addressed in the manuscript, as follows:

1. Please provide detailed search strategies for each database.

2. Lack of grading quality of evidence. Please supplement the GRADE assessment. You can appraise the level of certainty of evidence using the GRADE framework.

3. Please supplement the sensitivity analysis.

4. Please supplement the Assessment of publication biases.

5. Retrieving literature only in English may lead to language bias.

6. Statistical analysis of multiple studies (clinical case-control trials and cross-sectional study and report) may lead to increased heterogeneity. Heterogeneity can have a substantial influence on the credibility of meta-analysis findings and necessitates thorough evaluation and adjustment through suitable statistical techniques.

7. Kindly furnish a comprehensive Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) score for all case-control studies and cross-sectional studies.

8. Please provide the forest map of Vitamin treatment for RLS.

9. Please supplement the limitations of this study.

Reviewer #3: The subject is of great importance, original and little addressed yet the role of vitamins in restless leg syndrome.

Here are some suggestions for improving the article.

Insert the term systematic review and meta-analysis in the title, and not just meta-analysis.

Since the article covers several vitamins, the title should be "Role of vitamins..."

The study was not registered in prospero and puts it in PRISMA that it does not apply. You need to explain the reason why it does not apply. The meta-analysis was performed based on a systematic review.

Wouldn't it be interesting to register in prospero and update the searches?

Page 7 - Vitamin C/E – presents a conference paper. I suggest deleting conference paper, as issues could not be clarified.

Page 9 – Vitamin C+E – Put the 1st line of the AL of et al with lowercase letters.

The publication presents important data on restless leg syndrome, showing the role of vitamins in this syndrome.

Plos One uses Vancouver-style references. The article needs to correct the references, as they are not formatted in this style. Journal names are not abbreviated, authors with wrong abbreviations, etc

1. Title and Abstract:

- Is the title clear and descriptive? Partial

- Does the abstract adequately summarize the content of the article? Yes

2. Originality and Significance:

- Is the work original and innovative? Yes

- Does research contribute significantly to the field of study? Yes

3. Methodology:

- Is the methodology adequate and well described? Partial

- Are the methods used appropriate to answer the research questions? Partial

* See suggestions

4. Results:

- Are the results presented in a clear and logical manner? Yes

- Do the data support the conclusions presented? Yes, see suggestion*

5. Discussion and Conclusions:

- Is the discussion balanced and does it consider the implications of the results? Yes

- Are the conclusions justified by the results? Yes

The discussion is balanced, presenting both the positive findings and limitations of the studies, and exploring possible mechanisms underlying the observed effects of vitamins.

The conclusions are well founded by the results presented. There is a clear link between the data obtained and the suggested implications, with a careful approach to the limitations and the need for further research to confirm the findings.

6. References:

- Are the references current and relevant? Yes

- Does the manuscript adequately cite previous work? Yes

7. Writing and Organization

- Is the manuscript well-written and organized? Yes

- Is the language clear and free of grammatical errors? Yes

8. Ethical Compliance:

- Does the research comply with all applicable ethical standards? Yes

- Have the necessary ethical approvals been obtained, where applicable? Not applicable

9. Data and Reproducibility:

- Are the data available and sufficient to allow the results to be reproduced? Partial � include combinations of terms and Boolean operators used

- Does the article follow the PLOS ONE open data guidelines? Yes

GENERAL RECOMMENDATION:

1. It should be made clear in the conclusion of the abstract that low folate levels were only associated with the syndrome in the case of pregnant women.

2. In the methodology:

- Detail the combinations of terms used in the search

- Include the exact period in which the search was performed.

3. Clearly specify the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Clearly define "correlational studies" and "treatment studies"

4. Detail the data extraction process, including how the outliers were resolved and the role of the third reviewer.

5. Explain how the vitamin values were converted to standard units.

6. Briefly describe the bias risk assessment tools and how they were applied.

7. Describe the approach to dealing with heterogeneity and the type of statistical models used (e.g., fixed-effects or random-effects models).

8. Include a mention of the registration of the meta-analysis protocol in an appropriate database, such as PROSPERO;

9. Include a section on assessing publication bias, such as using the funnel plot.

Results:

The results presented are comprehensive and detailed, but some improvements in clarity and structure are needed

1. Explain what the manual search was in the methodology and what criteria were used

2. Include the use of the EndNote tool in the methods and what were the criteria for article exclusion

3. Starting the results section with a brief summary of the key findings can provide readers with an overview before they dive into the details.

4. Present separately the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for each type of vitamin.

5. Present the results of the evaluation of quality and publication bias separately and highlight any significant implications.

Conclusion Suggestion:

In this meta-analysis, low vitamin D levels were consistently found in patients with RLS, while low folate levels were observed specifically in pregnant women with RLS. In addition, vitamins C, E, and B6 improved symptoms in patients with RLS. These results suggest that vitamin deficiency or insufficiency, particularly in vitamin D and folate, may be related to the pathogenesis of RLS, and that supplementation with vitamins C, E, and B6 may be beneficial in managing RLS symptoms.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Mar 10;20(3):e0313571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313571.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 1


30 Aug 2024

Dear Editor and Reviewers,

Thank you for your letter and reviewers’ comments about our manuscript entitled “Role of vitamin in the pathogenesis and treatment of restless leg syndrome: A meta-analysis”. We have read the comments carefully and made correction accordingly.

Reviewer #1:

Answer:

Thank you for your reminder and suggestion.

All abbreviations used in the abstract require an explanation upon their first occurrence.

Gene names should be written in italics.

We have modified the abbreviations in the abstract and gene name formats in the article.

The search strategy should be provided separately for each database.

The search strategies of four databases are presented separately in the Supplemental Table.

In the inclusion criteria, please clarify whether it refers to the relationship between RLS and vitamin concentrations in blood or intake from the diet.

Our study intended to include all the relationships between vitamins and RLS in existing studies, and actually included the relationships between RLS and blood vitamin concentration, RLS incidence and vitamin intake, so there was no special limitation in the statement. We have further refined and supplemented the inclusion criteria: (iii) reported the association between vitamins and RLS, such as changes in vitamin levels in patients with RLS, or the relationship between vitamin intake and the onset of RLS.

Were no additional criteria applied regarding the age of the study population, ethnic origin, or duration of the intervention (related to RCT)? Should studies in which patients received co-supplementation of other nutrients be included in the analysis? Should articles published only in the form of conference reports also be included in this systematic review?

No additional criteria applied regarding the age of the study population, ethnic origin, or duration of the intervention (related to RCT). In the search, we did not exclude studies in which patients received other nutrient combination supplements, but we found no relevant controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria.

We supplemented the inclusion criteria for treatment studies: (ii) patients diagnosed with primary or secondary RLS, with no specific age or ethnic origin limit; (iii) vitamins taken as a treatment for RLS; if patients were also receiving a combination supplement of other nutrients and there was a control group in the study receiving the same other nutrients alone, we included them in the study as well. ”

Whether to include conference paper is a controversial issue. In order to avoid missing data, we chose to include the conference papers and note in our papers which data is from the conference reports to remind readers to look at the results objectively. Meanwhile, we deleted the conference paper that might affect the results for sensitivity analysis. If you need us to make further adjustments, please inform us, thank you!

Please also conduct a sensitivity analysis.

We supplemented the sensitivity analysis.

Please provide the results for the Q and I² statistics. Were funnel plots generated and were results for Begg’s and Egger’s tests calculated?

We supplemented the heterogeneity results, inverted funnel plots and Egger’s tests.

Was the study protocol registered in any database? If not, this information should be included in the manuscript.

We did not register the protocol in any database, we supplemented this information in the methods.

Please present Figure 1 using the PRISMA flowchart.

We have modified Figure 1 to PRISMA flowchart as suggested.

Figures presenting meta-analysis results are of very poor quality and are illegible.

The quality of the chart showing the results of the meta-analysis in the manuscript draft is really difficult to identify, we have done our best to provide the original, if there is a better way, we are willing to actively cooperate.

In the case of vitamin D, please specify which form of this vitamin was assessed. Was it 25(OH)D3?

Specific descriptions of vitamin D in the included literature include vitamin D,25(OH)D, and 25(OH)D3. We have shown the specific expressions of each literature in the table.

Please provide information in a table on the material (serum or plasma) in which the concentration of individual vitamins was measured and the technique/method used for the measurement of vitamin levels in each study.

Specific descriptions of vitamin D in the included literature include vitamin D,25(OH)D, and 25(OH)D3. We have shown the specific expressions of each literature in the table.

The description of RCT study results is too broad. It is not necessary to describe them in detail in the text since their characteristics are presented in the table.

We have deleted part of the description of RCT study results in the manuscript.

Is the vitamin dose given in Table 2 a daily dose? Please add information to the table on the form in which the vitamins were administered (tablets, capsules, drops).

We have added information about vitamin intake in Table 2.

Results for all outcomes from RCT studies and vitamin concentrations obtained in individual studies should be presented in a supplementary table.

All results of the RCT study have been reflected in the paper and Table 2. At the same time, the specific statistical results are reflected in the new supplemental figure (Supplement Fig 2). In correlation studies, the specific values of vitamin concentration are shown in Figures 2 and 3.

Please add the overall risk of bias to Supplementary Figure 1. In addition to the traffic-light plot of the risk of bias, please also include a summary plot of the risk of bias.

We have added the bias risk summary diagram in Supplement Fig 2b

Please present the results of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale assessment in a table.

We have added the results of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale assessment in the Supplemental Table 2.

In the first paragraph of the discussion, it should be noted that to date, only single studies assessing the effect of vitamin supplementation on RLS have been conducted, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about their effectiveness.

We have added your suggested statement to the first paragraph of the discussion:But it should be noted that to date, only single studies assessing the effect of vitamin supplementation on RLS have been conducted, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about their effectiveness.

The conclusions also need to be revised: Which results indicate the role of vitamins in the pathogenesis of RLS? No causal relationship was assessed in this study. Similarly, in my opinion, the title of the publication requires correction.

We have revised the title and conclusion. Please let us know if further revision is necessary.

Thank you!

Reviewer #2:

Answer:

Thank you for your suggestion.

1.Please provide detailed search strategies for each database.

The search strategies of four databases are presented separately in the Supplemental Table.

2.Lack of grading quality of evidence. Please supplement the GRADE assessment. You can appraise the level of certainty of evidence using the GRADE framework.

There are generally few articles on vitamin treatment of RLS, only 1-2 studies were involved for each vitamin, and the included studies had small sample sizes and short follow-up times, so we did not further evaluate the quality of evidence (such as GRADE review). If you insist, please let us know and we can further discuss and add, thank you.

3.Please supplement the sensitivity analysis.

We supplemented the sensitivity analysis.

4.Please supplement the Assessment of publication biases.

We supplemented the inverted funnel plots and Egger’s tests.

5.Retrieving literature only in English may lead to language bias.

We agree with you that searching only English literature can lead to linguistic bias. Due to the diversity of languages, it is difficult to obtain all relevant articles published in all languages, so we selected the English literature used in most meta-analyses.

6.Statistical analysis of multiple studies (clinical case-control trials and cross-sectional study and report) may lead to increased heterogeneity. Heterogeneity can have a substantial influence on the credibility of meta-analysis findings and necessitates thorough evaluation and adjustment through suitable statistical techniques.

We supplemented the study type in table1, and make sub-analysis based on the study type.

7. Kindly furnish a comprehensive Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) score for all case-control studies and cross-sectional studies.

We have added the results of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale assessment in the Supplemental Table 2.

8.Please provide the forest map of Vitamin treatment for RLS.

We have added the forest map of Vitamin treatment for RLS in Supplement Fig 1.

9.Please supplement the limitations of this study.

We supplemented the limitations of this study.

Thank you!

Reviewer #3: 

Answer:

Thank you for your suggestion.

Insert the term systematic review and meta-analysis in the title, and not just meta-analysis.

Since the article covers several vitamins, the title should be "Role of vitamins..."

According to your suggestion, we have changed the title to "Role of vitamins in the pathogenesis and treatment of restless leg syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis ".

The study was not registered in prospero and puts it in PRISMA that it does not apply. You need to explain the reason why it does not apply. The meta-analysis was performed based on a systematic review. Wouldn't it be interesting to register in prospero and update the searches?

Sorry about that. This systematic review is eligible for registration on prospero, and our research topic has not yet been registered by anyone else. However, as this article has been completed, we are no longer eligible to register for PROSPERO, for which we are very sorry. In any case, we believe that this meta-analysis has certain reference value and important significance for the follow-up research direction. I hope this paper is fit for publication.

Page 7 - Vitamin C/E – presents a conference paper. I suggest deleting conference paper, as issues could not be clarified.

Whether to include conference paper is a controversial issue. In order to avoid missing data, we chose to include the conference papers and note in our papers which data is from the conference reports to remind readers to look at the results objectively. Meanwhile, we deleted the conference paper that might affect the results for sensitivity analysis. If you need us to make further adjustments, please inform us, thank you!

Page 9 – Vitamin C+E – Put the 1st line of the AL of et al with lowercase letters.

Page 9 – Vitamin C+E – we have corrected the “AL” to “al”.

Thank you!

Plos One uses Vancouver-style references. The article needs to correct the references, as they are not formatted in this style. Journal names are not abbreviated, authors with wrong abbreviations, etc

We have corrected the references.

GENERAL RECOMMENDATION:

1. It should be made clear in the conclusion of the abstract that low folate levels were only associated with the syndrome in the case of pregnant women.

We have added this sentence in the conclusion of the abstract.

2. In the methodology:

- Detail the combinations of terms used in the search

We have added this information to the text.

- Include the exact period in which the search was performed.

We have added this information to the text.

3.Clearly specify the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Clearly define "correlational studies" and "treatment studies"

We have amended it as suggested.

4.Detail the data extraction process, including how the outliers were resolved and the role of the third reviewer.

We have amended it as suggested.

5.Explain how the vitamin values were converted to standard units.

“when the serum vitamin value is reported as nmol/L (pmol/L), we convert it to ng/mL (pg/ml), divided by the factor of 2.494 for 25-OH-VitD, 2.27 for folate, and 0.739 for vitamin B12”.

We think this expression can explain how we convert the data. If there is any need for further modification, please suggest, thank you!

6.Briefly describe the bias risk assessment tools and how they were applied.

We have amended it as suggested.

7. Describe the approach to dealing with heterogeneity and the type of statistical models used (e.g., fixed-effects or random-effects models).

We have added this information to the text.

8. Include a mention of the registration of the meta-analysis protocol in an appropriate database, such as PROSPERO;

I'm sorry we didn't register in advance. This systematic review is eligible for registration on prospero, and our research topic has not yet been registered by anyone else. However, as this article has been completed, we are no longer eligible to register for PROSPERO, for which we are very sorry. In any case, we believe that this meta-analysis has certain reference value and important significance for the follow-up research direction. I hope this paper is fit for publication.

9. Include a section on assessing publication bias, such as using the funnel plot.

We supplemented the inverted funnel plots.

Results:

The results presented are comprehensive and detailed, but some improvements in clarity and structure are needed

1.Explain what the manual search was in the methodology and what criteria were used

We have corrected it in the “Data sources and search strategy”

2. Include the use of the EndNote tool in the methods and what were the criteria for article exclusion

We have added this information to the text. And the exclusion criteria are presented in the “Selection criteria”.

3. Starting the results section with a brief summary of the key findings can provide readers with an overview before they dive into the details.

We have an overview of the included literature at the beginning of the results section (including sub-results). Please let me know if there is any need for further modification, thank you.

4. Present separately the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for each type of vitamin.

We have added a forest map of vitamin therapy RLS to supplement Figure 1, where specific data can be seen for each study's results.

5. Present the results of the evaluation of quality and publication bias separately and highlight any significant implications.

We supplemented the limitations of this study.

Conclusion Suggestion:

In this meta-analysis, low vitamin D levels were consistently found in patients with RLS, while low folate levels were observed specifically in pregnant women with RLS. In addition, vitamins C, E, and B6 improved symptoms in patients with RLS. These results suggest that vitamin deficiency or insufficiency, particularly in vitamin D and folate, may be related to the pathogenesis of RLS, and that supplementation with vitamins C, E, and B6 may be beneficial in managing RLS symptoms.

Thank you very much for your suggestions on the conclusion of the article,We have added these sentences in the conclusion. Thank you very much!

If we have something wrong, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Thank you !

Kind regards,

Xiao-min Xu

Xiu Chen

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0313571.s011.docx (32.7KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Dragan Hrncic

30 Sep 2024

PONE-D-24-27764R1Role of vitamins in the pathogenesis and treatment of restless leg syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysisPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Xu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

ACADEMIC EDITOR:- please do make required minor improvements.  

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 14 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Prof. Dr. Dragan Hrncic, MD, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1:  The authors did not address this question in their response to the reviewers' comments:

"Please provide information in a table on the material (serum or plasma) in which the concentration of individual vitamins was measured and the technique/method used for the measurement of vitamin levels in each study."

However, the information about the material and technique was added to Table 1.

The conclusions still need to be rewritten. Due to the limited number of studies regarding vitamins B6, C, and E, the authors should be cautious when drawing conclusions about these vitamins.

The authors should consider whether subgroup analysis makes sense when only one study is classified into each group (see Supplementary Figure 3).

Reviewer #2:  The manuscript has undergone thorough revision and exhibits a high overall quality. However, there are several spelling errors that require correction. For further details, please consult the attached document.

Reviewer #3:  Observations follow

Methodological Corrections

1. The search strategies were separated and detailed for the four databases, inserting this information in the Supplementary Table, as requested.

2. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were explained more clearly, especially the inclusion of relationships between blood concentration of vitamins and dietary intake, which were adjusted in the methodology. The authors also defined correlational studies and treatment studies, as well as detailing the issue of combined nutrient supplementation and the inclusion of studies from conference reports.

3. The data extraction process has been detailed, including the role of the third reviewer and the process of resolving outliers.

4. The conversion of vitamin units was explained with the formula used to convert the values into standard units (ng/mL), which clarifies the homogeneity of the data.

5. The bias risk assessment tools have been described and their application has been explained as requested.

6. Additional information about the fixed and random effects models, as well as the approach to dealing with heterogeneity, was inserted in the text.

7. Registration in PROSPERO, although not done, was acknowledged by the authors, who explained the impossibility of retroactive registration due to the conclusion of the study. This was mentioned in the manuscript.

8. Publication bias analysis was included, with inverted funnel plots and Egger tests, at the request of the reviewers.

About the presentation of the Results

1. The authors added a summary of the main findings at the beginning of the results section, improving the fluidity and comprehension of the text.

2. The presentation of the results of the RCTs was done separately for each vitamin, with the inclusion of forest plots, providing a clearer view of the individual results.

3. The evaluation of quality and publication bias was presented separately, with the inclusion of the risk of bias diagram in the Supplement.

4. Detailed information on how vitamins are administered (tablets, capsules, etc.) and daily doses have been added to Table 2 as requested.

About the discussion and conclusion

The authors incorporated the recommendations to adjust the discussion, including mentioning that only a limited number of studies have evaluated the impact of vitamin supplementation on Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions.

The conclusion was revised to include the association of low folate levels with RLS only in pregnant women as suggested, as well as highlighting that vitamins C, E and B6 showed improvement in symptoms in patients with RLS.

Other improvements observed:

1. The title has been adjusted to include the term "systematic review and meta-analysis"

2. References have been corrected to the Vancouver format, as required by PLOS One magazine.

The authors made all the requested recommendations. Only the registration in Prospero was not carried out, but it was justified.

Recommendation: Accept for publication.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Revised Manuscript.pdf

pone.0313571.s010.pdf (1.8MB, pdf)
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 10;20(3):e0313571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313571.r005

Author response to Decision Letter 2


8 Oct 2024

Dear Editor and Reviewers,

Thank you for your letter and reviewers’ comments about our manuscript entitled “Role of vitamins in the pathogenesis and treatment of restless leg syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis”. We have read the comments carefully and made correction accordingly.

Reviewer #1:

Answer:

The authors did not address this question in their response to the reviewers' comments:

"Please provide information in a table on the material (serum or plasma) in which the concentration of individual vitamins was measured and the technique/method used for the measurement of vitamin levels in each study."

However, the information about the material and technique was added to Table 1.

I'm sorry. It's our oversight and omission. We did add material and technology information to Table 1. Thank you very much for your meticulous, thank you!

The conclusions still need to be rewritten. Due to the limited number of studies regarding vitamins B6, C, and E, the authors should be cautious when drawing conclusions about these vitamins.

We have made the following modifications according to your suggestion. If there is still any deficiency, please inform us in time. Thank you for your reminding.

Abstract

In this meta-analysis, low vitamin D levels were found in patients with RLS, low folate levels were associated with RLS only in pregnant women, and vitamin C/E/B6 may improved symptoms in patients with RLS.

Conclusion

In this meta-analysis, low vitamin D levels were consistently found in patients with RLS, while low folate levels were observed specifically in pregnant women with RLS. In addition, based on limited data, vitamins C, E, and B6 may improved symptoms in patients with RLS. These results suggest that vitamin deficiency or insufficiency, particularly in vitamin D and folate, may be related to the pathogenesis of RLS.

The authors should consider whether subgroup analysis makes sense when only one study is classified into each group (see Supplementary Figure 3).

It is true that subgroup analysis does not make much sense when there is only one study per group, so we included it as additional material. As a systematic review, we just want to present the existing data completely, so that readers can have a comprehensive understanding of the existing research status, I hope you can understand.

If we have something wrong, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you!

Reviewer #2:

The manuscript has undergone thorough revision and exhibits a high overall quality. However, there are several spelling errors that require correction. For further details, please consult the attached document.

Thank you for your revision of our manuscript. We have made corresponding modifications according to your revision.

Thank you !

Kind regards,

Xiao-min Xu

Xiu Chen

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_2.docx

pone.0313571.s012.docx (32.7KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Dragan Hrncic

28 Oct 2024

Role of vitamins in the pathogenesis and treatment of restless leg syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PONE-D-24-27764R2

Dear Dr. Xu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Dragan Hrncic

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: I would like to acknowledge the submission of your manuscript and extend my sincere appreciation to the authors for their substantial contributions to this research. The article has been revised well and I recommend it for publication.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Dragan Hrncic

PONE-D-24-27764R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Xu,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Dragan Hrncic

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Supplement Fig 1. Subgroup analysis based on the study type. a. Vitamin D levels.

    b. Rate of vitamin D deficiency/insufficient. c. Folate levels. d. Vitamin B12.

    (TIF)

    pone.0313571.s001.tif (1.6MB, tif)
    Supplement Fig 2. Sensitivity analyses after excluding trials with NOS score as unclear. a.

    Rate of vitamin D deficiency/insufficient. b. Folate levels.

    (TIF)

    pone.0313571.s002.tif (1.2MB, tif)
    Supplement Fig 3. a-b.

    Vitamin D did not reduce patients’ RLS severity score compared to placebo, regardless of vitamin D deficiency; c-f. Vitamin B6 significantly reduced RLS patients’ IRLS scores and PSQI scores compared to placebo, and was comparable to magnesium oxide; g-h. Oral vitamin C could significantly reduce IRLS scores in hemodialysis associated RLS patients compared to placebo, and was comparable to pramipexole; i-j. Oral vitamin E could significantly reduce IRLS scores in hemodialysis associated RLS patients compared to placebo, and was equivalent to vitamin C; k-m. Oral vitamin C +  E significantly reduced IRLS scores in hemodialysis associated patient compared with double placebo, but was not better than vitamin E +  placebo or vitamin C +  placebo.

    (TIF)

    pone.0313571.s003.tif (734.3KB, tif)
    Supplement Fig 4a. ‘Risk of bias’ summary: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trials.

    b.‘Risk of bias’ graph: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included trials, with the majority of treatment trials having a low risk of bias.

    (TIF)

    pone.0313571.s004.tif (51.2KB, tif)
    Supplemental Table 1. Results of the systematic search strategy.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0313571.s005.docx (14.8KB, docx)
    Supplemental Table 2. Results of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale assessment.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0313571.s006.docx (34.9KB, docx)
    Supplemental Table 3. Details of the information and data extracted from each study.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0313571.s007.xlsx (41KB, xlsx)
    Supplemental Table 4. Numbering table of all 1391 studies identified in the literature search and reasons for inclusion and exclusion.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0313571.s008.docx (294.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0313571.s011.docx (32.7KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Revised Manuscript.pdf

    pone.0313571.s010.pdf (1.8MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_2.docx

    pone.0313571.s012.docx (32.7KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES