Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Mar 11.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Use Addctn J. 2024 Jun 3;45(4):706–715. doi: 10.1177/29767342241254591

Table 3:

Logistic Regression of MOUD as first-choice treatment (versus non-medication treatment), by race/ethnicity

White Black Latino/a

OR (95% CI) Adjusted
p-value
OR (95% CI) Adjusted
p-value
OR (95% CI) Adjusted
p-value
Demographics
Gender (ref=woman) 0.59 (0.33 – 1.05) 0.211 0.89 (0.54 – 1.46) 0.788 0.75 (0.43 – 1.31) 0.668
Age 1.02 (0.86 – 1.20) 0.950 0.96 (0.84 – 1.1) 0.742 1.01 (0.86 – 1.19) 0.918
Income 1.25 (0.91 – 1.72) 0.383 1.34 (1.04 – 1.76) 0.153 1.22 (0.89 – 1.67) 0.595
Treatment Knowledge (ref = none at all + a little knowledge)
MOUD treatment 1.13 (0.48 – 2.72) 0.950 0.80 (0.44 – 1.43) 0.703 1.06 (0.56 – 2.01) 0.918
Non-medication treatment 2.03 (1.03 – 4.17) 0.211 2.41 (1.34 – 4.34) 0.035 1.30 (0.68 – 2.50) 0.671
Treatment Access (ref = not sure + have difficulty in access treatment)
Methadone 0.71 (0.26 – 1.91) 0.783 1.08 (0.53 – 2.2) 0.925 2.08 (0.82 – 5.25) 0.494
Buprenorphine 3.87 (1.04 – 15.02) 0.211 1.73 (0.71 – 4.19) 0.499 1.26 (0.44 – 3.64) 0.903
Naltrexone 0.96 (0.26 – 3.29) 0.950 0.96 (0.38 – 2.37) 0.929 0.51 (0.2 – 1.22) 0.494
Non-medication treatment 0.94 (0.44 – 2.04) 0.950 0.74 (0.4 – 1.35) 0.593 1.31 (0.7 – 2.47) 0.671
Opioid use
Self-reported OUD (lifetime) 1.96 (0.52 – 12.8) 0.710 2.15 (0.72 – 9.28) 0.499 1.21 (0.43 – 4.32) 0.903

Note: OUD, Opioid Use Disorder; OR, Odds Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval

p-values were adjusted to control FDR < 0.05.