Skip to main content
letter
. 2025 Mar 10;21:533–540. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.21.41

Table 1.

Optimization of the reaction conditions.a

graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-21-533-i001.jpg

Entry Solvent Cat. (5 mol %) T (°C) t (h) Yield 3aa (%)b drc

1 CH2Cl2 rt 96 52 5:1
2 toluene rt 120 48 6:1
3 ClCH2CH2Cl rt 96 51 6:1
4 toluene 50 72 50 5:1
5 ClCH2CH2Cl 50 48 55 5:1
6 toluene 70 24 66 7:1
7 ClCH2CH2Cl 70 24 59 7:1
8 CHCl3 70 24 46 6:1
9 EtOAc 70 24 26 6:1
10 THF 70 24 65 3.5:1
11 acetone 70 24 n. d.
12 CH3CN 70 24 58 3:1
13d toluene 70 24 64 7:1
14d toluene SQ-1 70 24 61 7:1
15d toluene SQ-1 50 24 73 7:1
16d toluene THIO-1 50 24 55 4:1
17d,e toluene 70 24 44 7:1
18d,e toluene SQ-1 50 24 61 7:1

aReaction conditions: 3aa (0.1 mmol) and 4a (0.3 mmol) in 1 mL of solvent at T (°C); bisolated yield after column chromatography; cdetermined by 1H NMR of the crude reaction mixture; dreaction conditions: 3aa (0.2 mmol) and 4a (0.6 mmol) in 1 mL of solvent at T (°C); e50 mg of molecular sieves 4 Å were used.