Table 2.
Differences between intervention arms in health-related quality of life at posttest.
Comparison | Mean difference | 95% CI | Hedges g | |||||
Health-related quality of life | ||||||||
|
Physical functioning | |||||||
|
|
IP100a vs IP50b | 5.28 | –4.24 to 14.81 | 0.34 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs IP25c | 2.50 | –8.06 to 13.06 | 0.21 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs controls | 3.46 | –6.85 to 13.78 | 0.31 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs IP25 | 2.78 | –13.35 to 7.77 | –0.16 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs controls | 1.82 | –12.14 to 8.49 | –0.11 | |||
|
|
IP25 vs controls | 0.96 | –10.32 to 12.24 | 0.07 | |||
|
Role limitations due to physical health | |||||||
|
|
IP100 vs IP50 | 0.007 | –19.93 to 19.92 | 0.00 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs IP25 | 6.44 | –15.64 to 28.53 | 0.21 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs controls | 2.58 | –18.99 to 24.17 | 0.09 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs IP25 | 6.45 | –15.64 to 28.54 | 0.20 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs controls | 2.59 | –18.99 to 24.17 | 0.08 | |||
|
|
IP25 vs controls | 3.85 | –27.45 to 19.73 | –0.12 | |||
|
Role limitations due to emotional problems | |||||||
|
|
IP100 vs IP50 | 1.90 | –26.81 to 23.00 | –0.05 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs IP25 | 5.91 | –33.53 to 21.70 | –0.15 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs controls | 7.72 | –34.71 to 19.25 | –0.20 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs IP25 | 4.00 | –31.62 to 23.61 | –0.10 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs controls | 5.82 | –32.80 to 21.15 | –0.15 | |||
|
|
IP25 vs controls | 1.81 | –27.68 to 31.31 | –0.05 | |||
|
Energy/fatigue | |||||||
|
|
IP100 vs IP50 | 5.71 | –2.98 to 14.41 | 0.39 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs IP25 | 4.93 | –4.71 to 14.58 | 0.36 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs controls | 4.12 | –5.30 to 13.55 | 0.37 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs IP25 | 0.77 | –10.42 to 8.87 | –0.05 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs controls | 1.58 | –11.01 to 7.83 | –0.10 | |||
|
|
IP25 vs controls | 0.81 | –11.11 to 9.49 | –0.07 | |||
|
Emotional well-being | |||||||
|
|
IP100 vs IP50 | 3.54 | –5.03 to 12.12 | 0.24 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs IP25 | 2.41 | –11.93 to 7.09 | –0.23 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs controls | 1.08 | –10.37 to 8.20 | –0.09 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs IP25 | 5.96 | –15.47 to 3.54 | –0.40 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs controls | 4.62 | –13.92 to 4.66 | –0.30 | |||
|
|
IP25 vs controls | 1.33 | –8.82 to 11.49 | 0.12 | |||
|
Social functioning | |||||||
|
|
IP100 vs IP50 | 2.14 | –18.26 to 22.54 | 0.07 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs IP25 | 0.34 | –22.96 to 22.28 | –0.01 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs controls | 1.62 | –20.47 to 23.72 | 0.05 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs IP25 | 2.48 | –25.10 to 20.13 | –0.08 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs controls | 0.52 | –22.62 to 21.57 | –0.02 | |||
|
|
IP25 vs controls | 1.96 | –22.19 to 26.12 | 0.06 | |||
|
Pain | |||||||
|
|
IP100 vs IP50 | 3.35 | –15.18 to 21.89 | 0.11 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs IP25 | 9.11 | –11.43 to 29.67 | 0.31 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs controls | 1.53 | –21.61 to 18.54 | –0.05 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs IP25 | 5.75 | –14.79 to 26.31 | 0.20 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs controls | 4.89 | –24.97 to 15.19 | –0.17 | |||
|
|
IP25 vs controls | 10.64 | –32.60 to 11.30 | –0.39 | |||
|
General health | |||||||
|
|
IP100 vs IP50 | 9.09 | –1.34 to 19.52 | 0.53 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs IP25 | 7.24 | –4.32 to 18.81 | 0.52 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs controls | 8.32 | –2.97 to 19.62 | 0.58 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs IP25 | 1.84 | –13.41 to 9.72 | –0.10 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs controls | 0.76 | –12.06 to 10.53 | –0.04 | |||
|
|
IP25 vs controls | 1.07 | –11.27 to 13.43 | 0.07 | |||
|
Change in health from 1 year ago | |||||||
|
|
IP100 vs IP50 | 0.54 | –10.10 to 11.19 | 0.03 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs IP25 | 2.94 | –14.67 to 8.77 | –0.19 | |||
|
|
IP100 vs controls | 14.12 | 2.66 to 25.57 | 0.82 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs IP25 | 3.49 | –15.28 to 8.30 | –0.22 | |||
|
|
IP50 vs controls | 13.57 | 2.04 to 25.10 | 0.79 | |||
|
|
IP25 vs controls | 17.06 | 4.54 to 29.59 | 1.14 |
aIP100: in-person exercise coaching 100%.
bIP50: in-person exercise coaching 50%.
cIP25: in-person exercise coaching 25%.