Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 17;33(3):1264–1281. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.01.030

Table 1.

Population-level changes in visual response properties for ON BC and RGC optogenetic targeting

Visual response property ReaChR in RGCs compared with ON BC (population-level)
Retina dLGN
Photosensitivity similar in both
Maximum firing rate lower in RGC similar in both
Response reproducibility lower in RGC lower in RGC
Sensitivity normalization present and similar in both
Response onset latency shorter in RGC shorter in RGC
Response polarity more ON-biased in RGC (missing OFF/biphasic units) more ON-biased in RGC
Response transience more sustained in RGC (missing highly transient units) similar in both
Contrast sensitivity less sensitive in RGC (missing units with high contrast sensitivity) less sensitive in RGC
Temporal frequency tuning more stereotyped in RGC (missing units with low- or high-pass tuning) more stereotyped and biased to higher frequencies in RGC
Diversity of visual responses reduced in RGC similar in both
Visual code compared with WT less WT-like in RGC less WT-like in RGC