Skip to main content
. 2005 Jul 22;5:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-5-12

Table 4.

Analysis of timing and site of swabs.

Timing (36 v 32 weeks) Site (Either Lower Vaginal or Perianal vs Lower Vaginal Swab alone)
Difference (36 – 32) 95% Confidence Interval p-value Difference (Either vs LVS) 95% Confidence Interval p-value

Sensitivity 8.8% (1.2%, 16.3%) 0.023* 8.2% (4.6%, 11.7%) <0.001†
Specificity 0.6% (-1.2%, 2.5%) 0.493 -1.8% (-2.6%, -0.9%) <0.001§/P >
Negative Predictive Value 2.3% (0.3%, 4.3%) 0.026* 2.0% (1.0%, 3.0%) <0.001†
Positive Predictive Value 3.6% (-2.8%, 9.9%) 0.269 -3.1% (-5.8%, -0.5%) 0.019§/P >
Likelihood Ratio + 1.62 (-2.69, 5.92) 0.462 -1.59 (-3.68, 0.49) 0.134
Likelihood Ratio - -0.09 (-0.18, -0.01) 0.021* -0.08 (-0.12, -0.04) <0.001†
Diagnostic Odds Ratio 14.3 (-8.06, 36.8) 0.210 3.63 (-4.99, 12.2) 0.409

* favours swabs taken at 36 weeks over 32 weeks

† favours either site over LVS only

§favours LVS only over either site