Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 9;39(5):584–596. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000004104

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis.

Study: first author (year) [ref] Country Country income statusa Cohort study design Recruitment period Number of women analysed Population characteristics Method to correct for confounders Method to estimate gestational age Quality assessment
Adam (2016) [20] Sudan Middle income Retrospective January 2009 to December 2013 78 Women recruited from maternity hospital, urban and rural setting Risk factor analysis Unspecified Average
Bailey (2013) [21] Ukraine Middle income Retrospective 2008 to 2010 3535 First born twin included, all hospital deliveries, 14.7% history of IDU None LNMP and ultrasound (unspecified) Poor
Bengtson (2020) [22] South Africa Middle income Prospective March 2013 to August 2015 1116 Twins excluded, women recruited from antenatal care clinics in Gugulethu Cape Town, urban setting, 17.2% alcohol use None Ultrasound (unspecified), LMP or fundal height Poor
Chen (2012) [23] Botswana Middle income Retrospective 1 May 2009 to 30 April 2011 33 148 First born twin included, all hospital deliveries, 5.3% alcohol use, 1.7% smoking Regression analysis, risk factor analysis LNMP, SFH or ultrasound (unspecified) Average
Dadabhai (2019) [24] Malawi Low income Prospective January 2016 to September 2017 1299 Twins excluded, 96% of deliveries occurred in healthcare facilities, urban setting Regression analysis Ballard score and LMP Average
Djeha (2019) [25] Canada High income Prospective January 2003 to December 2016 159 Urban setting, 9.4% smoking None First trimester ultrasound or LMP Average
Ekouevi (2008) [26] Cote d’Ivoire Low income Prospective March 2001 to July 2003 and August 2003 to August 2007 358 Twins excluded, recruited from antenatal clinics, urban setting Regression analysis Unspecified Average
Goetghebuer (2019) [27] Belgium High income Prospective December 2010 to November 2013 255 Women recruited from hospital antenatal clinic, urban setting, 9.2% smoking, 10.1% alcohol Risk factor analysis Ballard score Average
Hu (2019) [28] China Middle income Prospective October 2009 to May 2018 585 Twins excluded, recruited through integrated prevention of MTCT programme, urban setting Regression, risk factor analysis First or second trimester ultrasound, if unable to assess ultrasound LMP used Average
Kowalska (2003) [29] Poland Middle income Prospective January 1995 to February 2003 102 Twins included, recruited from an outpatient HIV clinic, 47.1% IDU Risk factor analysis Unspecified Poor
Li (2016) [30] Tanzania Low income Prospective November 2004 to September 2011 3314 Recruited from hospitals, health centres and dispensaries, urban setting Risk factor analysis LNMP and SFH Poor
Li (2020) [31] China Middle income Prospective October 2014 to September 2017 1449 Twins excluded, women enrolled from midwifery hospitals Regression, risk factor analysis LMP or ultrasound (unspecified) Average
Malaba (2017) [32] South Africa Middle income Prospective April 2013 to August 2015 1793 Twins excluded, large community-based public sector primary care facility Regression, risk factor analysis LNMP and SFH Average
Malaba (2021) [33] South Africa Middle income Prospective April 2015 to October 2016 3952 Twins excluded, enrolled at first antenatal clinic in Cape town Regression analysis LMP, SFH and/or ultrasound (unspecified) Average
Marazzi (2011) [34] Malawi and Mozambique Low income Retrospective July 2005 to June 2009 3273 Twins included, women recruited from DREAM centres Regression analysis LNMP and clinical exam (unspecified) Average
Moodley (2016) [35] South Africa Middle income Retrospective July 2011 to December 2011 and January 2014 to June 2014 9847 Twins excluded, data abstracted from maternity registers of a regional hospital in Durban, South Africa Regression analysis, risk factor analysis LNMP and/or ultrasound (unspecified) Average
Olagbuji (2010) [36] Nigeria Middle income Prospective January 2007 to December 2008 406 Twins excluded, recruited from a tertiary referral centre, all women delivered in a healthcare facility Risk factor analysis Unspecified Poor
Ramokolo (2017) [37] South Africa Middle income Retrospective October 2012 to May 2013 8778 Twins excluded, recruited from primary health facilities Risk factor analysis LNMP Average
Rempis (2017) [38] Uganda Low income Retrospective February 2013 to December 2013 412 Twins excluded, all delivered in a private referral hospital Risk factor analysis Unspecified Poor
Rubin (2011) [39] Switzerland High income Prospective 1984 to 2007 1040 Twins excluded, 22% smoking, 26% IDU None Unspecified Poor
Santosa (2019) [40] South Africa Middle income Prospective 28 May 2013 to 20 July 2016 633 Twins excluded, women recruited from hospital in urban setting, 98.7% hospital deliveries, 6.4% smoking, 8.2% alcohol Regression, risk factor analysis Ultrasound <14 weeks Good
Saums (2019) [41] USA High income Retrospective 2011 to 2018 3729 Women recruited from hospital, urban setting, all hospital deliveries, 11.5% smoking, 2.9% alcohol, 13.4% IDU Risk factor analysis Unspecified Average
Sebitloane (2017) [42] South Africa Middle income Retrospective 1 April 2011 to 30 April 2014 1461 Twins excluded, women recruited and delivered at a regional hospital, urban setting None Unspecified Poor
Short (2014) [43] United Kingdom High income Retrospective 1996 to 2010 331 Twins included, 13.0% smoking, recruited from an HIV antenatal clinic, all women delivered in a tertiary hospital, urban setting None Unspecified Poor
Silverman (2010) [44] Zambia Low income Retrospective Unspecified 1238 Twins included Risk factor analysis Unspecified Poor
Snijdewind (2018) [45] Netherlands High income Retrospective January 1997 to February 2015 10 795 Twins excluded, women recruited from 26 nationwide sites, 10.8% smoking, 11.7% alcohol use, 0.6% IDU, Regression, risk factor analysis LNMP and/or ultrasound (unspecified) Average
Tan (2023) [46] China Middle income Retrospective January 2004 to December 2021 1010 Twins excluded Regression analysis Unspecified Average
Tiam (2019) [47] Lesotho Middle income Prospective June 2014 to February 2016 1594 91.6% delivered in a health facility, enrolment in 14 mixed setting study centres across 3 districts None LMP Poor
Yu (2012) [48] China Middle income Retrospective June 2006 to July 2010 194 Twins excluded, 8.8% IDU Risk factor analysis Unspecified Poor
Zash (2017) [49] Botswana Middle income Retrospective 15 August 2014 to 15 August 2016 46 267 Twins excluded, 6.3% alcohol consumption or smoking, obstetric records extracted at 8 national government hospitals Regression analysis LNMP and/or ultrasound (unspecified) or fundal height Average
Zash (2018) [50] Botswana Middle income Retrospective 15 August 2014 to 15 August 2016 57 005 Twins excluded, women recruited from 8 government hospitals, all hospital deliveries, 8.3% alcohol or smoking in pregnancy Regression analysis LNMP Average

Details on the inclusion of twins, recruitment centre, urban/rural setting, deliveries at home/hospital, smoking, alcohol use, and IDU were sought and reported here if provided by each study. IDU, illicit drug use; LMP, last menstrual period; LNMP, last normal menstrual period; MTCT, mother-to-child transmission; SFH, symphysio-fundal height.

a

Based on the World Bank country income classification at the time of the study.