Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2024 Nov 28;45(4):e16186. doi: 10.1111/liv.16186

Targeting PNPLA3 to Treat MASH and MASH Related Fibrosis and Cirrhosis

Daniel Lindén 1,2,, Gregory Tesz 3, Rohit Loomba 4
PMCID: PMC11907219  NIHMSID: NIHMS2037556  PMID: 39605307

ABSTRACT

Metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is caused by metabolic triggers and genetic predisposition. Among the genetic MASLD risk variants identified today, the common PNPLA3 148M variant exerts the largest effect size of MASLD heritability. The PNPLA3 148M protein is causatively linked to the development of liver steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis in experimental studies and is therefore an appealing target for therapeutic approaches to treat this disease. Several PNPLA3 targeted approaches are currently being evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatohepatitis (MASH), the most severe form of MASLD and promising proof of principle data with reduced liver fat content in homozygous PNPLA3 148M risk allele carriers has been reported from phase 1 trials following hepatic silencing of PNPLA3. Thus, targeting PNPLA3, the strongest genetic determinant of MASH may hold promise as the first precision medicine for the treatment of this disease. A histological endpoint‐based phase 2b study has been initiated and several more are expected to be initiated to evaluate treatment effects on histological MASH and liver fibrosis in participants being homozygous for the PNPLA3 148M risk allele variant. The scope of this mini‐review is to briefly describe the PNPLA3 148M genetics, function and preclinical experimental evidence with therapeutic approaches targeting PNPLA3 as well as to summarise the PNPLA3 based therapies currently in clinical development.

Keywords: MASH, MASLD, metALD, NAFLD, NASH, PNPLA3, precision medicine, SLD, steatotic liver disease


Summary.

  • PNPLA3 rs738409, 148M, is the strongest genetic risk allele variant for MASLD, MASH and metALD related fibrosis and cirrhosis.

  • PNPLA3 148M induces liver steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis in preclinical experimental studies.

  • Silencing of PNPLA3 148M improves MASH and liver fibrosis in liver cellular systems and humanised transgenic mouse models.

  • Several PNPLA3 targeted therapies are being investigated in clinical trials and proof of principle with reduction in liver fat content has been demonstrated.

  • Further research and histology and non‐invasive test‐based phase IIb studies are needed to assess treatment effects on histological MASH and liver fibrosis to develop novel precision medicine approaches targeting PNPLA3.

1. Introduction

Metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD, previously NAFLD) is now a leading aetiology of chronic liver disease worldwide [1, 2, 3]. It encompasses a spectrum of conditions from benign hepatic steatosis to the more aggressive variant metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatohepatitis (MASH, previously NASH) characterised by inflammation and fibrosis which can progress to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and end‐stage liver disease, and is also a leading indication for liver transplantation [4, 5]. The prevalence of MASLD and MASH is highly dependent on individual risk factors such as obesity and type 2 diabetes but there are also ethnic differences with a higher risk occurring in the Hispanic population compared to people of European Caucasian background [5, 6, 7, 8].

In 2008, Romeo and Hobbs discovered in a genome‐wide association study (GWAS) that a single nucleotide polymorphism in the patatin‐like phospholipase domain‐containing 3 (PNPLA3) gene (rs738409, encoding an isoleucine to a methionine amino acid switch in the PNPLA3 protein, 148M), was strongly associated with increased liver fat content and inflammation. Interestingly, the risk allele variant was most common in Hispanics, the group most susceptible to developing MASLD, MASLD‐related advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis [9, 10]. Since then, several genetic allele variants have been associated with protection against or increased risk of MASLD and some of these including PNPLA3 are pursued as potential therapeutic targets to treat the disease [11, 12]. In this mini‐review we will summarise the recent progress in targeting PNPLA3 as a potential precision medicine to treat MASH in patients carrying the PNPLA3 148M risk allele.

2. PNPLA3 Genetics in Liver Disease

Since the initial discovery of the genetic link between PNPLA3 148M with steatohepatitis [9], this variant has been found to be associated with a broad spectrum of liver diseases including MASH, liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and HCC [13, 14, 15, 16]. In a recent large MASLD longitudinal cohort study from Japan, all of the 80 individuals who developed HCC were carriers of the PNPLA3 148M risk allele variant [17]. The 148M variant is also associated with early disease diagnosis and increased liver‐related mortality [18, 19]. In recent large GWAS on liver cirrhosis, the risk conferred by PNPLA3 148M was markedly amplified by obesity, diabetes, and alcoholic intake for liver‐related outcomes, relationships that were among the strongest gene–environment interactions detected in man [14, 20]. In addition, homozygous 148M individuals with portal hypertension had double the risk of hepatic decompensation and liver‐related mortality [21]. When it comes to chronic hepatitis C, almost all persons can today achieve a sustained virological response upon treatment with antivirals. However, the PNPLA3 148M genotype was independently associated with newly diagnosis of HCC in chronic hepatitis C individuals who achieved a sustained virological response [22]. Thus, a therapy targeting hepatic PNPLA3 might have a broader usage beyond the treatment of MASH.

There is also human genetics evidence supporting the concept of targeting PNPLA3 for the treatment of MASH in that another PNPLA3 genetic variant, p.E434K (rs2294918), is associated with reduced liver PNPLA3 mRNA levels and protection from MASLD [23].

The PNPLA3 148M variant has also been reported to be associated with marginal protection from coronary artery disease (CAD) using a recessive but not an additive genetic model [24], a finding that was not replicated in another study using the same Coronary Artery Disease Genome‐wide Replication and Meta‐analysis plus the CAD (CARDIoGRAMplusC4D, www.CARDIOGRAMPLUSC4D.org) database or in an extended database from Denmark [25]. The discrepancy between these studies likely relates to the very small effect size of the 148M variant. The PNPLA3 148M variant has also been associated with a slightly decreased risk for acne, gout and gallstones [26]. When it comes to potential side effects with a PNPLA3 targeted therapy it is important to keep in mind that current strategies are liver‐specific and that silencing or modulation of the 148M protein will not restore endogenous PNPLA3 148I enzymatic function. However, it will be important to monitor potential side effects in the ongoing clinical trials.

3. PNPLA3 148M Mechanisms in Liver Disease Pathophysiology

PNPLA3 is a membrane protein that is located on hepatic lipid droplets where it hydrolyses triglycerides and retinol esters in hepatocytes and stellate cells, respectively, and the PNPLA3 148M variant has reduced hydrolase activity [27, 28]. Furthermore, PNPLA3 also has a weak acyltransferase activity which is lost in the 148M variant [29]. In humans, the 148M variant is associated with increased hepatic retention of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) due to impaired transacylation of PUFAs from diacylglycerol to phosphatidylcholine synthesis [30]. In line, PNPLA3 was recently shown under lipogenic conditions to exert its lipolytic function preferentially on triglycerides‐enriched PUFAs, a fatty acid that is important for phospholipid desaturation in the process of secretion of triglyceride‐rich lipoproteins and the 148M variant was claimed to be a loss of function with regards to this activity [31]. Silencing or modulation of PNPLA3 in homozygous 148M risk allele carriers would likely not affect this process since endogenous wildtype PNPLA3 enzymatic function will not be restored. However, if the 148M enzyme has a partial loss of function when it comes to lipolysis of PUFA‐enriched triglycerides, either directly or indirectly through an inhibitory action of other lipases, one could expect a further increase in PUFAs in triglycerides following PNPLA3 silencing or modulation in homozygous 148M risk allele carriers. Carriers of the 148M variant have hepatic mitochondrial dysfunction leading to decreased de novo lipogenesis and channelling of carbons to ketogenesis which also characterise the progression of MASLD [32]. Furthermore, PNPLA3 148M was also recently suggested to induce morphological changes in the Golgi apparatus such as enhanced lipid droplet‐Golgi contact sites [33].

Importantly, overexpression of human PNPLA3 148M (in contrast to overexpression of 148I) specifically in hepatocytes causes MASH and liver fibrosis in mice fed a Western diet supplemented with sugar water [34]. This finding demonstrates that the risk allele variant in hepatocytes can influence the full disease spectrum and thus be the target cell for PNPLA3 silencing or modulation as a potential therapy. Furthermore, normal 148M expression levels, achieved by introducing the 148M variant into the mouse Pnpla3 gene led to hepatic steatosis in mice fed with a high sucrose‐containing diet [35, 36]. Helen Hobbs's lab has elegantly demonstrated that the PNPLA3 148M protein can escape ubiquitination‐assisted proteasomal degradation [37], a process recently reported to specifically involve a membrane‐bound E3 ubiquitin ligase named bifunctional apoptosis regulator (BFAR) [38]. This will lead to the accumulation of PNPLA3 148M protein levels on hepatocyte lipid droplets in mice and humans [37, 38, 39]. However, the 148M protein can still bind to a joint co‐activator with adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL, or PNPLA2) named 1‐acylglycerol‐3‐phosphate O‐acyltransferase (ABHD5, or comparative gene identification‐58, CGI‐58), leading to reduced lipid remodelling on lipid droplets in hepatocytes [40]. Thus, the 148M variant behaves both as a loss of function in terms of enzymatic activity and as a gain of new function with negative transactivation activity due to accumulation of the inactive protein on lipid droplets overall causing a toxic hepatic environment.

In addition to promoting hepatic lipid accumulation, overexpression of PNPLA3 148M in hepatocytes of mice fed a Western diet supplemented with sugar water increases oxidative stress, ceramide levels and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) activation promoting liver inflammation and fibrosis [34]. Interestingly, in human pluripotent stem cell‐derived multicellular liver cultures of hepatocytes, stellate cells and macrophages cultured under lipotoxic MASLD‐inducing conditions, the 148M variant elevated interleukin‐6 (IL‐6)/STAT3 and NF‐κB activity thereby accelerating the MASLD phenotype [41]. These findings support that PNPLA3 148M is not just associated with MASLD, but is causatively linked to the disease, suggesting that targeting the PNPLA3 148M protein could be a viable therapeutic strategy as a precision medicine for MASH in individuals who are carriers of the risk allele variant.

4. Preclinical Proof of Concept Targeting PNPLA3 148M

Several independent groups have presented preclinical proof of concept studies in MASH by silencing PNPLA3/Pnpla3 using different modalities (Table 1). Silencing hepatic Pnpla3 using an N‐acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc)‐conjugated antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) improved MASH and liver fibrosis in homozygous Pnpla3 148M knock‐in mice fed with a MASH‐inducing diet [35]. Ablation of hepatic Pnpla3 in homozygous Pnpla3 148M knock‐in mice using virally expressed short hairpin RNA improved hepatic steatosis [42]. Furthermore, silencing of human PNPLA3 in mice with overexpression of human PNPLA3 148M in hepatocytes and fed a Western diet supplemented with sugar water, alleviated MASH (including ballooned hepatocytes) and liver fibrosis [34].

TABLE 1.

Preclinical proof of concept targeting PNPLA3 148M in vivo in mice for the treatment of MASH and liver fibrosis.

Mouse model Treatment modality Results References
Pnpla3 I148M knock‐in mice on high fructose diet Virally expressed short hairpin RNA Reduced liver steatosis BasuRay et al. [42]
Pnpla3 I148M knock‐in mice on high sucrose diet GalNac‐ASO Reduced liver steatosis Lindén et al. [35]
Mice with AAV overexpression of Halo‐tagged human PNPLA3 148M on high sucrose diet PROTAC targeting of Halo‐tagged PNPLA3 protein Reduced liver steatosis BasuRay et al. [42]
Pnpla3 I148M knock‐in mice on MASH‐inducing diet GalNac‐ASO Reduced liver steatosis, inflammation, NAS, and fibrosis Lindén et al. [35]
Mice with AAV overexpression of human PNPLA3 148M on high fat Western diet and sugar in drinking water (WDSW) siRNA in lipid nanoparticles Reduced liver steatosis, ballooning, inflammation, NAS, and fibrosis Banini et al. [34]

Abbreviations: AAV, adeno‐associated virus; GalNAc, N‐acetylgalactosamine; Halo, modified bacterial dehalogenase; MASH, metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatohepatitis; NAS, NAFLD activity score; Pnpla3, patatin‐like phospholipase domain‐containing protein 3; PROTAC, proteolysis‐targeting chimera.

It has been challenging to develop small molecule degraders or modulators of PNPLA3 partly due to the intracellular location on lipid droplet membranes. However, proof of concept has been demonstrated with a proteolysis‐targeting chimera (PROTAC) approach improving hepatic steatosis. In this study, a modified bacterial dehalogenase (Halo) tag was expressed as a fusion protein with PNPLA3 which was then recognised by the PROTAC machinery to promote ubiquitylation and degradation of the Halo‐PNPLA3 protein [42]. To develop a PROTAC based therapy to reduce endogenous PNPLA3 protein levels, a specific binder to PNPLA3 needs first to be identified. When it comes to small molecule modulators of PNPLA3, momelotinib was identified in a screen of clinical stage compounds to reduce PNPLA3 expression levels and intracellular lipid content in a human multilineage 3D spheroid model of MASH [43]. Momelotinib is a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor that was recently approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis [44]. Momelotinib however also inhibits non‐JAK kinases and the reduction in PNPLA3 gene expression was largely attributed to inhibition of bone morphogenic protein (BMP) signalling rather than via the JAK pathway [43]. Adverse events observed with momelotinib include thrombocytopenia, diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting, dizziness, peripheral neuropathy, and increases in liver function tests [44], which may preclude development as a therapy for MASH. However, it would be interesting to further explore the signalling pathways affected by momelotinib treatment in relation to modulation of PNPLA3 activity.

Importantly, the expression levels of PNPLA3 are highly regulated by fasting and refeeding via the sterol regulatory element binding protein‐1c (SREBP‐1c) transcription factor which is induced by insulin and liver X receptor (LXR) agonists [45]. It is therefore critical to determine direct effects on PNPLA3 expression levels versus indirect effects mediated by the nutritional status. Recently, small molecule inhibition of diacylglycerol acyltransferase 2 (DGAT2) was found to direct diacylglycerol into phospholipid synthesis leading to increased amounts of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) resulting in reduced hepatic SREBP‐1 cleavage, fatty acid synthesis as well as decreased accumulation and secretion of triglycerides from the liver. DGAT2 inhibition was also associated with reduced hepatic PNPLA3 mRNA expression levels [46]. Thus, therapeutic approaches that lower SREBP‐1c mediated lipogenesis could indirectly lower PNPLA3 activity at least to some extent, and combined inhibition of DGAT2 and acetyl‐coenzyme A carboxylase (ACC) is currently being pursued as a potential treatment for MASH [47, 48].

5. PNPLA3 Therapies in Clinical Development

There are today several ASO and siRNA‐based PNPLA3 targeting approaches being evaluated in clinical trials (Table 2 and Figure 1). AZD2693 is a GalNAc‐conjugated ASO targeting hepatic PNPLA3 mRNA and subsequently protein production. The results from randomised single‐blind, placebo‐controlled single ascending dose (SAD) and double‐blind, placebo‐controlled multiple ascending dose (MAD) trials were recently presented (https://www.journal‐of‐hepatology.eu/article/S0168‐8278(24)00598‐1/abstract). In the SAD trial, up to 110 mg was evaluated in obese but otherwise healthy volunteers while in the MAD trial, three monthly doses of 25, 50, and 80 mg were evaluated in participants with presumed MASH and homozygous for the PNPLA3 148M risk allele. These phase 1 studies evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of AZD2693. The 80 mg MAD cohort was included to assess target engagement measured as PNPLA3 mRNA knock‐down in liver biopsies at baseline and 1 week after the third dose. AZD2693 was well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events that lead to discontinuations in any of the studies. The PK profile was in line with other ASOs with a rapid absorption and distribution and a half‐life ranging from 14 to 22 days. In MAD, AZD2693 treatment led to a reduction in placebo‐corrected liver fat content of up to 15% (50 mg). In the 80 mg target engagement MAD study cohort, a mean knockdown of liver PNPLA3 mRNA by close to 90% from baseline was observed. Interestingly, there was a dose‐dependent increase of PUFAs in serum triglycerides indicating that homozygosity for 148M does not result in a complete loss of lipolytic function on PUFAs in triglycerides [30, 31]. In addition, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP) levels were reduced upon treatment, indicating a decreased inflammatory activity. AZD2693 has been progressed into the FORTUNA phase IIb trial in participants with histologically confirmed MASH and homozygote for the PNPLA3 148M risk allele (NCT05809934). The primary outcome will be to assess histological resolution of MASH with improvement in fibrosis as a secondary measure.

TABLE 2.

PNPLA3 therapies in clinical development.

Drug name (company) Modality Clinical stage Clinical trial IDs Main results presented from phase I trials in homozygous 148M carriers
AZD2693 (AstraZeneca) GalNac‐ASO Phase IIb NCT05107336 a , NCT04142424 a , NCT04483947 a , NCT05919069 c , NCT05809934 c
  • Well tolerated

  • PK profile increased proportionally with increasing doses compatible with a rapid liver uptake

  • Dose‐dependent reduction in placebo‐corrected liver fat content of up to 15% (50 mg)

  • Mean knockdown of liver PNPLA3 mRNA by close to 90% from baseline (80 mg)

  • Dose‐dependent increase in polyunsaturated fatty acids in circulating triglycerides

  • Decreased serum high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein levels

ARO‐PNPLA3 (previously JNJ‐75220795) (Arrowhead) GalNAc‐siRNA Phase I NCT04844450 a , NCT05039710 d
  • Well tolerated

  • PK profile increased approximately proportionally with increasing doses compatible with a rapid liver uptake

  • Dose‐dependent reduction in placebo‐corrected liver fat content of up to 39% (400 mg)

LY3849891 (Eli Lilly/ Dicerna) GalNAc‐siRNA Phase I NCT05395481 b Data not available
ALN‐PNP (Alnylam/Regeneron) GalNAc‐siRNA Phase I NCT05648214 b , NCT06024408 b Data not available
PF‐07853578 (Pfizer) SM modulator Phase I NCT05890105 a Data not available

Note: Data from www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Abbreviations: ASO, antisense oligonucleotide; GalNAc, N‐acetylgalactosamine; PK, pharmacokinetic; PNPLA3, patatin‐like phospholipase domain‐containing protein 3; siRNA, small interfering RNA; SM, small molecule.

a

Completed.

b

Recruiting.

c

Active, not recruiting.

d

Terminated.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

PNPLA3 targeting strategies in clinical development and proposed hepatocyte mechanisms in MASH. Silencing or modulation of PNPLA3 in PNPLA3 148M risk allele carriers lead to: (1) increased availability of the joint co‐activator ABHD5 for ATGL activation leading to an increased lipid remodelling in lipid droplets, (2) increased PUFAs in VLDL triglycerides, (3) decreased STAT3 and NF‐κB activation leading to (4) decreased levels of IL6 and hsCRP, inflammation and fibrosis. ABHD5, 1‐acylglycerol‐3‐phosphate O‐acyltransferase; ASGPR1, asialoglycoprotein receptor 1; ASO, antisense oligonucleotide; GalNAc, N‐acetylgalactosamine; hsCRP, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein; IL6, interleukin 6; MASH, metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatohepatitis; NF‐κB, nuclear factor kappa‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells; PNPLA3, patatin‐like phospholipase domain‐containing protein 3; PUFA‐TG, polyunsaturated fatty acids in triglycerides; RNaseH1, Ribonuclease H1; RISC, RNA‐induced silencing complex; siRNA, small interfering RNA; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; VLDL, very low‐density lipoprotein. Created with BioRender.com.

ARO‐PNPLA3 (formerly JNJ‐75220795) is a PNPLA3 GalNAc‐siRNA that has been studied in randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase 1 trials in homozygous and heterozygous carriers of the PNPLA3 148M risk allele with liver steatosis (https://ir.arrowheadpharma.com/news‐releases/news‐release‐details/arrowhead‐pharmaceuticals‐gains‐full‐rights‐nash‐candidate‐aro) and the results were recently published [49]. ARO‐PNPLA3/JNJ‐75220795 was administered as a single injection at escalating doses from 10 to 400 mg or at a single dose level of 75 mg and the participants were followed for 24 weeks. The PK profile increased approximately proportionally with increasing doses and was compatible with a rapid liver uptake. Treatment of participants being homozygous for the PNPLA3 148M risk allele with ARO‐PNPLA3/JNJ‐75220795 reduced liver fat content of up to 39% from baseline placebo‐corrected (46% non‐placebo corrected) at the highest dose level (400 mg) with no clinically meaningful changes in any safety parameters, no serious or severe AEs or discontinuations, and mostly mild AEs reported. Interestingly, there was no effect on liver fat content in heterozygous PNPLA3 148M risk allele carriers at any of the doses studied [49]. No target engagement with knockdown of liver PNPLA3 mRNA or protein levels or effects on fatty acid composition in circulating lipids were reported from these clinical trials.

LY3849891 is a PNPLA3 GalNac‐siRNAs in SAD/MAD trials in carriers of the PNPLA3 148M risk allele with liver steatosis. ALN‐PNP, another GalNac siRNA, is in a SAD trial in healthy volunteers. AMG 609 is a PNPLA3 148M allele selective GalNac siRNA [50] that has been evaluated in a SAD trial in patients with MASLD. However, AMG 609 is no longer listed on the Amgen pipeline webpage so the project may not be active at this point.

PF‐07853578, an orally available PNPLA3 modulator has been assessed in phase 1 trials evaluating safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics in healthy adult participants. We are expecting to see these results in the near future.

6. Future Perspectives and Summary

Following the recent FDA approval of resmetirom (https://www.fda.gov/news‐events/press‐announcements/fda‐approves‐first‐treatment‐patients‐liver‐scarring‐due‐fatty‐liver‐disease), there is now a treatment option for MASH [51]. In addition, there are several late‐stage clinical trials evaluating for instance various incretin‐like therapies for the treatment of MASH targeting different metabolic drivers of the disease [5]. Since PNPLA3 148M is the strongest genetic driver for MASH, it will be important for future studies to explore the efficacy of emerging MASH therapies in the different PNPLA3 genetic segments in order to identify opportunities for combination or add‐on therapies. Furthermore, a liver‐targeted PNPLA3‐based therapy will likely not affect the body weight or systemic metabolic drivers of MASH. Therefore, targeting PNPLA3, the main genetic risk factor for MASH will hopefully have at least an additive effect when given on top of future standard of care. Recently, a functional interaction between the female sex through the oestrogen receptor‐α and the PNPLA3 148M genetic variant was demonstrated that may contribute to the increased prevalence of MASLD in women post menopause [52]. It will therefore also be interesting to explore potential sex differences in response to a PNPLA3‐targeted therapy. In addition, targeting PNLA3 might have a broader usage beyond MASH, including cirrhosis, preventing hepatic decompensation, MASLD with increased alcoholic intake (MetALD), alcoholic‐associated liver disease (ALD) and following antiviral treatment of hepatitis C [14, 21, 22], that could be explored in dedicated clinical trials. In addition, there is an association between the PNPLA3 148M genetic variant and chronic kidney disease. PNPLA3 is expressed in renal podocytes, pericytes, and proximal tubule cells so the association could either be due to a direct role of PNPLA3 in the kidney and/ or indirectly via the progression of MASLD [53]. More research is needed to better understand the role of PNPLA3 in the kidney and if the current PNPLA3 silencing/modulatory strategies could add benefits also in kidney disease. To identify individuals carrying the PNPLA3 148M genetic risk factor it will be important to develop a companion diagnostics test, and this could also be important for other genetic variants in MASH for potential polygenic risk score stratification. For instance, the protective genetic variant in the gene HSD17β13 (rs72613567, T to TA insertion) has been shown to partially mitigate the genetic risk of PNPLA3 148M in liver disease [54]. Thus, combined silencing or modulation of both PNPLA3 and HSD17β13 could in principle be explored in individuals with MASH carrying both the risk allele in PNPLA3 and the non‐protective allele in HSD17β13. However, when considering potential combination therapies, both entities need to contribute to the beneficial effects with an acceptable side effect profile.

In summary, since the discovery of the genetic link between PNPLA3 and MASLD, great progress has been made in exploring PNPLA3 as a drug discovery target to treat the disease. There are now both promising preclinical data and emerging clinical data supporting the concept of targeting hepatic PNPLA3 as a future precision medicine opportunity for the treatment of MASH which holds great promise for individuals with MASH carrying the strongest genetic risk factor for this disease.

Author Contributions

D.L. wrote the manuscript. G.T. and R.L. revised the manuscript with intellectual input. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

D.L. is employed by AstraZeneca and may own company stock or possess stock options. G.T. is employed by Pfizer and may own company stock or possess stock options. R.L. serves as a consultant to Aardvark Therapeutics, Altimmune, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Cascade Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Glympse bio, Inipharma, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen Inc., Lipidio, Madrigal, Neurobo, Novo Nordisk, Merck, Pfizer, Sagimet, 89 bio, Takeda, Terns Pharmaceuticals and Viking Therapeutics. R.L. has stock options in Sagimet biosciences. In addition, his institution received research grants from Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Astrazeneca, Boehringer‐Ingelheim, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galectin Therapeutics, Gilead, Intercept, Hanmi, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sonic Incytes and Terns Pharmaceuticals. Co‐founder of LipoNexus Inc.

Handling Editor: Luca Valenti

Funding: This work was supported by NCATS (5UL1TR001442), NIDDK (U01DK061734, U01DK130190, R01DK106419, R01DK121378, R01DK124318, P30DK120515), NHLBI (P01HL147835), John C Martin Foundation (RP124) and NIAAA (U01AA029019).

References

  • 1. Kanwal F., Neuschwander‐Tetri B. A., Loomba R., and Rinella M. E., “Metabolic Dysfunction‐Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Update and Impact of New Nomenclature on the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Practice Guidance on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease,” Hepatology 79 (2024): 1212–1219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Loomba R., Friedman S. L., and Shulman G. I., “Mechanisms and Disease Consequences of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease,” Cell 184 (2021): 2537–2564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Younossi Z. M., Wong G., Anstee Q. M., and Henry L., “The Global Burden of Liver Disease,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 21 (2023): 1978–1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Rinella M. E., Neuschwander‐Tetri B. A., Siddiqui M. S., et al., “AASLD Practice Guidance on the Clinical Assessment and Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease,” Hepatology 77 (2023): 1797–1835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Tincopa M. A., Anstee Q. M., and Loomba R., “New and Emerging Treatments for Metabolic Dysfunction‐Associated Steatohepatitis,” Cell Metabolism 36 (2024): 912–926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ajmera V., Liu A., Bettencourt R., Dhar D., Richards L., and Loomba R., “The Impact of Genetic Risk on Liver Fibrosis in Non‐alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Elastography,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 54 (2021): 68–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bridi L., Agrawal S., Tesfai K., et al., “The Impact of Genetic Risk on the Prevalence of Advanced Fibrosis and Cirrhosis in Prospectively Assessed Patients With Type 2 Diabetes,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 60 (2024): 369–377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Rich N. E., Oji S., Mufti A. R., et al., “Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Prevalence, Severity, and Outcomes in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 16 (2018): 198–210 e192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Romeo S., Kozlitina J., Xing C., et al., “Genetic Variation in PNPLA3 Confers Susceptibility to Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease,” Nature Genetics 40 (2008): 1461–1465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Tamaki N., Ahlholm N., Luukkonen P. K., et al., “Risk of Advanced Fibrosis in First‐Degree Relatives of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 132, no. 21 (2022): 1–8, 10.1172/JCI162513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Carlsson B., Lindén D., Brolén G., et al., “Review Article: The Emerging Role of Genetics in Precision Medicine for Patients With Non‐alcoholic Steatohepatitis,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 51 (2020): 1305–1320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Linden D. and Romeo S., “Therapeutic Opportunities for the Treatment of NASH With Genetically Validated Targets,” Journal of Hepatology 79 (2023): 1056–1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Anstee Q. M., Darlay R., Cockell S., et al., “Genome‐Wide Association Study of Non‐alcoholic Fatty Liver and Steatohepatitis in a Histologically Characterised Cohort(☆),” Journal of Hepatology 73 (2020): 505–515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ghouse J., Sveinbjörnsson G., Vujkovic M., et al., “Integrative Common and Rare Variant Analyses Provide Insights Into the Genetic Architecture of Liver Cirrhosis,” Nature Genetics 56 (2024): 827–837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Liu Y. L., Patman G. L., Leathart J. B. S., et al., “Carriage of the PNPLA3 rs738409 C >G Polymorphism Confers an Increased Risk of Non‐alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma,” Journal of Hepatology 61 (2014): 75–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Valenti L., al‐Serri A., Daly A. K., et al., “Homozygosity for the Patatin‐Like Phospholipase‐3/Adiponutrin I148M Polymorphism Influences Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease,” Hepatology 51 (2010): 1209–1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Seko Y., Yamaguchi K., Shima T., et al., “The Greater Impact of PNPLA3 Polymorphism on Liver‐Related Events in Japanese Non‐alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients: A Multicentre Cohort Study,” Liver International 43 (2023): 2210–2219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Unalp‐Arida A. and Ruhl C. E., “Patatin‐Like Phospholipase Domain‐Containing Protein 3 I148M and Liver Fat and Fibrosis Scores Predict Liver Disease Mortality in the U.S. Population,” Hepatology 71 (2020): 820–834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Walker R. W., Belbin G. M., Sorokin E. P., et al., “A Common Variant in PNPLA3 Is Associated With Age at Diagnosis of NAFLD in Patients From a Multi‐Ethnic Biobank,” Journal of Hepatology 72 (2020): 1070–1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Emdin C. A., Haas M., Ajmera V., et al., “Association of Genetic Variation With Cirrhosis: A Multi‐Trait Genome‐Wide Association and Gene‐Environment Interaction Study,” Gastroenterology 160 (2021): 1620–1633.e1613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Mandorfer M., Scheiner B., Stättermayer A. F., et al., “Impact of Patatin‐Like Phospholipase Domain Containing 3 rs738409 G/G Genotype on Hepatic Decompensation and Mortality in Patients With Portal Hypertension,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 48 (2018): 451–459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ohta A., Ogawa E., Murata M., et al., “Impact of the PNPLA3 Genotype on the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatitis C Virus Eradication,” Journal of Medical Virology 94 (2022): 5007–5014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Donati B., Motta B. M., Pingitore P., et al., “The rs2294918 E434K Variant Modulates Patatin‐Like Phospholipase Domain‐Containing 3 Expression and Liver Damage,” Hepatology 63 (2016): 787–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Simons N., Isaacs A., Koek G. H., Kuč S., Schaper N. C., and Brouwers M. C. G. J., “PNPLA3, TM6SF2, and MBOAT7 Genotypes and Coronary Artery Disease,” Gastroenterology 152 (2017): 912–913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Lauridsen B. K., Stender S., Kristensen T. S., et al., “Liver Fat Content, Non‐alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, and Ischaemic Heart Disease: Mendelian Randomization and Meta‐Analysis of 279 013 Individuals,” European Heart Journal 39 (2018): 385–393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Diogo D., Tian C., Franklin C. S., et al., “Phenome‐Wide Association Studies Across Large Population Cohorts Support Drug Target Validation,” Nature Communications 9 (2018): 4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. He S., McPhaul C., Li J. Z., et al., “A Sequence Variation (I148M) in PNPLA3 Associated With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Disrupts Triglyceride Hydrolysis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 285 (2010): 6706–6715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Pirazzi C., Valenti L., Motta B. M., et al., “PNPLA3 Has Retinyl‐Palmitate Lipase Activity in Human Hepatic Stellate Cells,” Human Molecular Genetics 23 (2014): 4077–4085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Pingitore P., Pirazzi C., Mancina R. M., et al., “Recombinant PNPLA3 Protein Shows Triglyceride Hydrolase Activity and Its I148M Mutation Results in Loss of Function,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1841 (2014): 574–580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Luukkonen P. K., Nick A., Hölttä‐Vuori M., et al., “Human PNPLA3‐I148M Variant Increases Hepatic Retention of Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids,” JCI Insight 4, no. 16 (2019): 1–13, 10.1172/jci.insight.127902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Johnson S. M., Bao H., McMahon C. E., et al., “PNPLA3 Is a Triglyceride Lipase That Mobilizes Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids to Facilitate Hepatic Secretion of Large‐Sized Very Low‐Density Lipoprotein,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 4847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Luukkonen P. K., Porthan K., Ahlholm N., et al., “The PNPLA3 I148M Variant Increases Ketogenesis and Decreases Hepatic de Novo Lipogenesis and Mitochondrial Function in Humans,” Cell Metabolism 35 (2023): 1887–1896. e1885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Sherman D. J., Liu L., Mamrosh J. L., et al., “The Fatty Liver Disease‐Causing Protein PNPLA3‐I148M Alters Lipid Droplet‐Golgi Dynamics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 121 (2024): e2318619121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Banini B. A., Kumar D. P., Cazanave S., et al., “Identification of a Metabolic, Transcriptomic, and Molecular Signature of Patatin‐Like Phospholipase Domain Containing 3‐Mediated Acceleration of Steatohepatitis,” Hepatology 73 (2021): 1290–1306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Linden D., Ahnmark A., Pingitore P., et al., “Pnpla3 Silencing With Antisense Oligonucleotides Ameliorates Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Fibrosis in Pnpla3 I148M Knock‐In Mice,” Molecular Metabolism 22 (2019): 49–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Smagris E., BasuRay S., Li J., et al., “Pnpla3I148M Knockin Mice Accumulate PNPLA3 on Lipid Droplets and Develop Hepatic Steatosis,” Hepatology 61 (2015): 108–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. BasuRay S., Smagris E., Cohen J. C., and Hobbs H. H., “The PNPLA3 Variant Associated With Fatty Liver Disease (I148M) Accumulates on Lipid Droplets by Evading Ubiquitylation,” Hepatology 66 (2017): 1111–1124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Das A., Cheng H., Wang Y., et al., “The Ubiquitin E3 Ligase BFAR Promotes Degradation of PNPLA3,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 121 (2024): e2312291121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Ericson E., Bergenholm L., Andréasson A. C., et al., “Hepatic Patatin‐Like Phospholipase Domain‐Containing 3 Levels Are Increased in I148M Risk Allele Carriers and Correlate With NAFLD in Humans,” Hepatology Communications 6 (2022): 2689–2701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Wang Y., Kory N., BasuRay S., Cohen J. C., and Hobbs H. H., “PNPLA3, CGI‐58, and Inhibition of Hepatic Triglyceride Hydrolysis in Mice,” Hepatology 69 (2019): 2427–2441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Park J., Zhao Y., Zhang F., et al., “IL‐6/STAT3 Axis Dictates the PNPLA3‐Mediated Susceptibility to Non‐Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease,” Journal of Hepatology 78 (2023): 45–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. BasuRay S., Wang Y., Smagris E., Cohen J. C., and Hobbs H. H., “Accumulation of PNPLA3 on Lipid Droplets Is the Basis of Associated Hepatic Steatosis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116 (2019): 9521–9526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Schwartz B. E., Rajagopal V., Smith C., et al., “Discovery and Targeting of the Signaling Controls of PNPLA3 to Effectively Reduce Transcription, Expression, and Function in Pre‐Clinical NAFLD/NASH Settings,” Cells 9, no. 10 (2020): 1–17, 10.3390/cells9102247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Tefferi A. and Pardanani A., “Momelotinib for Myelofibrosis: Our 14 Years of Experience With 100 Clinical Trial Patients and Recent FDA Approval,” Blood Cancer Journal 14 (2024): 47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Huang Y., He S., Li J. Z., et al., “A Feed‐Forward Loop Amplifies Nutritional Regulation of PNPLA3,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (2010): 7892–7897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Rong S., Xia M., Vale G., et al., “DGAT2 Inhibition Blocks SREBP‐1 Cleavage and Improves Hepatic Steatosis by Increasing Phosphatidylethanolamine in the ER,” Cell Metabolism 36 (2024): 617–629.e617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Amin N. B., Carvajal‐Gonzalez S., Purkal J., et al., “Targeting Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase 2 for the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis,” Science Translational Medicine 11, no. 520 (2019): 1–13, https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/scitranslmed.aav9701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Calle R. A., Amin N. B., Carvajal‐Gonzalez S., et al., “ACC Inhibitor Alone or Co‐Administered With a DGAT2 Inhibitor in Patients With Non‐alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Two Parallel, Placebo‐Controlled, Randomized Phase 2a Trials,” Nature Medicine 27 (2021): 1836–1848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Fabbrini E., Rady B., Koshkina A., et al., “Phase 1 Trials of PNPLA3 siRNA in I148M Homozygous Patients With MAFLD,” New England Journal of Medicine 391 (2024): 475–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Murray J. K., Long J., Liu L., et al., “Identification and Optimization of a Minor Allele‐Specific siRNA to Prevent PNPLA3 I148M‐Driven Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease,” Nucleic Acid Therapeutics 31 (2021): 324–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Noureddin M., Charlton M. R., Harrison S. A., et al., “Expert Panel Recommendations: Practical Clinical Applications for Initiating and Monitoring Resmetirom in Patients With MASH/NASH and Moderate to Noncirrhotic Advanced Fibrosis,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 22, no. 12 (2024): 2367, 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Cherubini A., Ostadreza M., Jamialahmadi O., et al., “Interaction Between Estrogen Receptor‐Alpha and PNPLA3 p.I148M Variant Drives Fatty Liver Disease Susceptibility in Women,” Nature Medicine 29 (2023): 2643–2655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Mantovani A. and Targher G., “PNPLA3 Variation and Kidney Disease,” Liver International, Published ahead of print, June 14 (2024): 1–7, 10.1111/liv.16010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Abul‐Husn N. S., Cheng X., Li A. H., et al., “A Protein‐Truncating HSD17B13 Variant and Protection From Chronic Liver Disease,” New England Journal of Medicine 378 (2018): 1096–1106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Liver International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES