Skip to main content
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1997 Apr;225(4):422–431. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199704000-00012

Mechanisms of hernia recurrence after preperitoneal mesh repair. Traditional and laparoscopic.

A S Lowham 1, C J Filipi 1, R J Fitzgibbons Jr 1, R Stoppa 1, G E Wantz 1, E L Felix 1, W B Crafton 1
PMCID: PMC1190751  PMID: 9114802

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors provide an assessment of mechanisms leading to hernia recurrence after laparoscopic and traditional preperitoneal herniorrhaphy to allow surgeons using either technique to achieve better results. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The laparoscopic and traditional preperitoneal approaches to hernia repair are analogous in principle and outcome and have experienced a similar evolution over different time frames. The recurrence rate after preperitoneal herniorrhaphy should be low (< 2%) to be considered a viable alternative to the most successful methods of conventional herniorrhaphy. METHODS: Experienced surgeons supply specifics regarding the mechanisms of recurrence and technical measures to avoid hernia recurrence when using the preperitoneal prosthetic repair. Videotapes of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in 13 patients who subsequently experienced a recurrence also are used to determine technical causes of recurrence. RESULTS: Factors leading to recurrence include surgeon inexperience, inadequate dissection, insufficient prosthesis size, insufficient prosthesis overlap of hernia defects, improper fixation, prosthesis folding or twisting, missed hernias, or mesh lifting secondary to hematoma formation. CONCLUSIONS: The predominant factor in successful preperitoneal hernia repair is adequate dissection with complete exposure and coverage of all potential groin hernia sites. Hematoma mesh lifting and inadequate lateral inferior and medial inferior mesh fixation represent the most common causes of recurrence for surgeons experienced in traditional or laparoscopic preperitoneal hernia repair.

Full text

PDF
422

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dion Y. M., Laplante R., Charara J., Marois M. The influence of the number of endoclips and of mesh incorporation on the strength of an experimental hernia patch repair. Surg Endosc. 1994 Nov;8(11):1324–1328. doi: 10.1007/BF00188292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dyson W. L., Pierce W. S. Changing concept of inguinal herniorrhaphy; experience with preperitoneal approach. Arch Surg. 1965 Dec;91(6):971–975. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1965.01320180105023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ekberg O., Lasson A., Kesek P., van Westen D. Ipsilateral multiple groin hernias. Surgery. 1994 May;115(5):557–562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Felix E. L., Michas C. A., Gonzalez M. H., Jr Laparoscopic hernioplasty. TAPP vs TEP. Surg Endosc. 1995 Sep;9(9):984–989. doi: 10.1007/BF00188456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferzli G., Kiel T. Evolving techniques in endoscopic extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc. 1995 Aug;9(8):928–930. doi: 10.1007/BF00768897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fitzgibbons R. J., Jr, Camps J., Cornet D. A., Nguyen N. X., Litke B. S., Annibali R., Salerno G. M. Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Results of a multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 1995 Jan;221(1):3–13. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199501000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Geis W. P., Crafton W. B., Novak M. J., Malago M. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: results and technical aspects in 450 consecutive procedures. Surgery. 1993 Oct;114(4):765–774. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ger R., Monroe K., Duvivier R., Mishrick A. Management of indirect inguinal hernias by laparoscopic closure of the neck of the sac. Am J Surg. 1990 Apr;159(4):370–373. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)81273-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Himpens J. M. Laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty. Repair with a conventional vs a new self-expandable mesh. Surg Endosc. 1993 Jul-Aug;7(4):315–318. doi: 10.1007/BF00725948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoffman H. C., Traverso A. L. Preperitoneal prosthetic herniorrhaphy. One surgeon's successful technique. Arch Surg. 1993 Sep;128(9):964–970. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420210024003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kavic M. S. Laparoscopic hernia repair. Three-year experience. Surg Endosc. 1995 Jan;9(1):12–15. doi: 10.1007/BF00187877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kieturakis M. J., Nguyen D. T., Vargas H., Fogarty T. J., Klein S. R. Balloon dissection facilitated laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1994 Dec;168(6):603–608. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80130-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Margoles J. S., Braun R. A. Preperitoneal versus classical hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1971 Jun;121(6):641–643. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(71)90036-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McKernan J. B., Laws H. L. Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias using a totally extraperitoneal prosthetic approach. Surg Endosc. 1993 Jan-Feb;7(1):26–28. doi: 10.1007/BF00591232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. NYHUS L. M., CONDON R. E., HARKINS H. N. Clinical experiences with preperitoneal hernial repair for all types of hernia of the groin, with particular reference to the importance of transversalis fascia analogues. Am J Surg. 1960 Aug;100:234–244. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(60)90296-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Panton O. N., Panton R. J. Laparoscopic hernia repair. Am J Surg. 1994 May;167(5):535–537. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(94)90252-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Peacock E. E., Jr, Madden J. W. Studies on the biology and treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia. II. Morphological changes. Ann Surg. 1974 May;179(5):567–571. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197405000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Phillips E. H., Arregui M., Carroll B. J., Corbitt J., Crafton W. B., Fallas M. J., Filipi C., Fitzgibbons R. J., Franklin M. J., McKernan B. Incidence of complications following laparoscopic hernioplasty. Surg Endosc. 1995 Jan;9(1):16–21. doi: 10.1007/BF00187878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Phillips E. H., Carroll B. J., Fallas M. J. Laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair without peritoneal incision. Technique and early clinical results. Surg Endosc. 1993 May-Jun;7(3):159–162. doi: 10.1007/BF00594098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Popp L. W. Endoscopic patch repair of inguinal hernia in a female patient. Surg Endosc. 1990;4(1):10–12. doi: 10.1007/BF00591403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Postlethwait R. W. Causes of recurrence after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Surgery. 1971 May;69(5):772–775. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Powell J. J., Murray G. D., O'Dwyer P. J. Evaluation of staples and prostheses for use in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994 Apr;4(2):109–112. doi: 10.1089/lps.1994.4.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. RYAN E. A. Recurrent hernias; an analysis of 369 consecutive cases of recurrent inguinal and femoral hernias. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1953 Mar;96(3):343–354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Read R. C. Preperitoneal prosthetic inguinal herniorrhaphy without a relaxing incision. Am J Surg. 1976 Dec;132(6):749–752. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(76)90450-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Read R. C. Recurrence after preperitoneal herniorrhaphy in the adult. Arch Surg. 1975 May;110(5):666–671. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360110212037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rignault D. P. Properitoneal prosthetic inguinal hernioplasty through a Pfannenstiel approach. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Nov;163(5):465–468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rosenthal D., Walters M. J. Preperitoneal synthetic mesh placement for recurrent hernias of the groin. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Sep;163(3):285–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rosser J. The anatomical basis for laparoscopic hernia repair revisited. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994 Feb;4(1):36–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rutkow I. M., Robbins A. W. Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States. Surg Clin North Am. 1993 Jun;73(3):413–426. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)46027-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schaap H. M., van de Pavoordt H. D., Bast T. J. The preperitoneal approach in the repair of recurrent inguinal hernias. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Jun;174(6):460–464. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schultz L., Graber J., Pietrafitta J., Hickok D. Laser laparoscopic herniorraphy: a clinical trial preliminary results. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1990;1(1):41–45. doi: 10.1089/lps.1990.1.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Spaw A. T., Ennis B. W., Spaw L. P. Laparoscopic hernia repair: the anatomic basis. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991 Oct;1(5):269–277. doi: 10.1089/lps.1991.1.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stoppa R. E. The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias. World J Surg. 1989 Sep-Oct;13(5):545–554. doi: 10.1007/BF01658869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stoppa R., Petit J., Henry X. Unsutured Dacron prosthesis in groin hernias. Int Surg. 1975 Aug;60(8):411–412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tetik C., Arregui M. E., Dulucq J. L., Fitzgibbons R. J., Franklin M. E., McKernan J. B., Rosin R. D., Schultz L. S., Toy F. K. Complications and recurrences associated with laparoscopic repair of groin hernias. A multi-institutional retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc. 1994 Nov;8(11):1316–1323. doi: 10.1007/BF00188291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vogt D. M., Curet M. J., Pitcher D. E., Martin D. T., Zucker K. A. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic onlay versus conventional inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg. 1995 Jan;169(1):84–90. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80114-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wantz G. E. Giant prosthetic reinforcement of the visceral sac. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989 Nov;169(5):408–417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Welsh D. R., Alexander M. A. The Shouldice repair. Surg Clin North Am. 1993 Jun;73(3):451–469. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)46030-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES