Table 8.
Correlation as per Cernea classification with other studies
| Study | Type 1 (%) | Type 2a (%) | Type 2b (%) | Not seen (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cernea et al. 1992 [1] | 63.0 | 17.0 | 20.0 | 0 |
| Cernea et al. 1995 [3] | 23.0 | 15.0 | 54.0 | 8.0 |
| Aina et al. 2001 [4] | 16.1 | 51.8 | 24.8 | 7.3 |
| Bellantone et al. 2001 [5] | 58.6 | 19.6 | 10.2 | 11.6 |
| Ozlugedik et al. 2007 [6] | 22.5 | 60.0 | 17.5 | 0 |
| Mishra et al. 2007 [7] | 28.2 | 53.8 | 10.3 | 7.7 |
| Chuang et al. 2010 [8] | 16.2 | 39.5 | 38.3 | 6.0 |
| Pradeep et al. 2012 [9] | 71.5 | 16.8 | 7.2 | 4.5 |
| Athvale et al. 2013 [10] | 38.2 | 60.0 | 1.8 | 0 |
| Ravikumar et al. 2016 [11] | 17.1 | 57.2 | 18.8 | 6.9 |
| Menon et al. 2017 [12] | 29 | 61 | 10 | 0 |
| Ekhar et al. 2017 [13] | 34.88 | 52.33 | 12.79 | 0 |
| Present study | 27.5 | 25 | 42.5 | 5 |