Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 22;77(3):1401–1409. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05351-5

Table 8.

Correlation as per Cernea classification with other studies

Study Type 1 (%) Type 2a (%) Type 2b (%) Not seen (%)
Cernea et al. 1992 [1] 63.0 17.0 20.0 0
Cernea et al. 1995 [3] 23.0 15.0 54.0 8.0
Aina et al. 2001 [4] 16.1 51.8 24.8 7.3
Bellantone et al. 2001 [5] 58.6 19.6 10.2 11.6
Ozlugedik et al. 2007 [6] 22.5 60.0 17.5 0
Mishra et al. 2007 [7] 28.2 53.8 10.3 7.7
Chuang et al. 2010 [8] 16.2 39.5 38.3 6.0
Pradeep et al. 2012 [9] 71.5 16.8 7.2 4.5
Athvale et al. 2013 [10] 38.2 60.0 1.8 0
Ravikumar et al. 2016 [11] 17.1 57.2 18.8 6.9
Menon et al. 2017 [12] 29 61 10 0
Ekhar et al. 2017 [13] 34.88 52.33 12.79 0
Present study 27.5 25 42.5 5