Abstract
First isolated by Brazeau et al. in 1972, somatostatin (SST) is a neuropeptide known for regulating various signaling pathways through its specific cell surface receptors. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) comprise a family of five G protein‐coupled receptors that are widely distributed across the human body and are expressed by various tumor types. The growing understanding of their clinical potential led to the introduction of both cold and radiolabeled somatostatin analogs (SSAs), which have revolutionized the management of several cancers, especially neuroendocrine tumors. As a direct consequence, advances in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) over the last 30 years led to the approval of 177Lu‐DOTATATE for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs). Theoretically, any cancer patients whose tumors express SSTR, as demonstrated in vivo through SSTR‐based molecular imaging, could be candidates for PRRT, especially those with limited treatment options. However, evidence on the efficacy of PRRT in non‐GEPNET SSTR‐expressing tumors is limited, and mainly derived from small retrospective studies. Given the limited therapeutic options for advanced/metastatic patients, there is a clear need for randomized trials to formally approve PRRT with SSAs for patients who may benefit from this treatment, particularly in certain types of neuroendocrine neoplasms such as lung carcinoids, paragangliomas, and meningiomas, where high rates of disease control (up to 80%) can be achieved. In addition, emerging evidence supports the potential of combination therapies, alpha emitters, and non‐SSTR‐based radionuclide therapy in tumors beyond GEPNET. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of PRRT's role in cancers beyond GEPNET, exploring new possibilities and future directions for most SSTR highly expressing tumors.
Keywords: neuroendocrine tumor, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, SSTR
The thera(g)nostic approach with somatostatin analog‐based agents extends beyond gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Understanding tumor biological mechanisms is essential for optimizing treatment strategies.

1. INTRODUCTION
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a molecular radionuclide treatment involving the systemic administration of a radiolabeled peptide designed to target with high affinity and specificity cellular proteins, commonly cell surface receptors, such as somatostatin receptor (SSTR). 1 Somatostatin (SST), a small cyclic neuropeptide first isolated by Brazeau et al. in 1972, 2 is known for regulating a wide range of specific targets in the endocrine, gastrointestinal, and nervous systems, where it inhibits the release of hormones, growth factors, and cytokines. 3 SST exerts its effects through five subtypes of cell surface receptors (SSTR1, SSTR2A and SSTR2B, SSTR3, SSTR4, and SSTR5), which belong to the G protein‐coupled receptor family. 4 These receptors are widely distributed throughout the human body and are expressed by various tumors, 5 particularly those derived from the neural crest.
The development of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs (SSAs) has significantly transformed both the diagnostic and therapeutic management of SSTR‐expressing tumors, particularly neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), a heterogeneous group of tumors arising from cells of neuroendocrine (NE) origin in many different organs. The landmark NETTER‐1 trial 6 has led to the formal approval of 177Lu‐DOTATATE (Lutathera; Advanced Accelerator Applications USA, Inc., Millburn, NJ) by both the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a second‐line treatment in patients who progressed after cold SSAs. However, this study included only patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) that account for only 30% of all NENs. In principle, all cancer patients with a tumor known to express high levels of SSTRs are eligible for high‐dose PRRT, especially those with limited or no alternative treatment options. Though, even if more than 20 years have passed since the Multicenter Analysis of a Universal Receptor Imaging and Treatment Initiative (MAURITIUS trial), 7 evidence for the use of PRRT in NENs of other origins (non‐GEPNET) remains limited, primarily based on retrospective analyses involving small sample sizes. Understanding the biological mechanisms underlying GEPNET and non‐GEPNET tumors is essential for optimizing treatment strategies. Differences in frequently mutated genes have been observed between these tumor types, contributing to the identification of several molecular markers for predicting PRRT response, such as specific mutations, DNA methylation patterns, chromosomal abnormalities, and transcriptional alterations. 8 , 9 Furthermore, tumor immunogenicity and microenvironment are key determinants of response to therapy. Significant intratumoral heterogeneity has been documented in NENs, characterized by diverse immune cell populations, including conventional T cells, CD8+ T cells, NK cells, B cells, and plasma cells. 10 Additionally, increased expression of IFNγ‐associated genes and heightened intratumoral T‐cell infiltration have been correlated with greater tumor aggressiveness. 11 In the context of PRRT, a key factor influencing therapeutic efficacy is the heterogeneity of SSTR expression across various tumor types. Moreover, resistance mechanisms, such as receptor downregulation and tumor dedifferentiation, may develop differently across tumor entities, further impacting treatment outcomes. 12 From a radiobiological perspective, additional factors, including the absorbed radiation dose, radiation type, and intrinsic tumor radiosensitivity, must also be carefully considered when evaluating different cancer types. 9 , 13
The aim of the present review was to summarize the evidence on the application of PRRT using SSAs in tumors beyond GEPNETs. In addition, future perspectives and new treatment approaches were also discussed.
1.1. Imaging of neuroendocrine tumors
The incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has been rising over the past 30 years, 1 largely due to advancements in diagnostic tools such as specific immunohistochemical methods and the progress of molecular imaging. Historically, scintigraphy with radiolabeled SSAs, first with 123I‐labeled analogs and later with 111In‐ and 99mTc‐labeled analogs, was commonly used for imaging of NENs, owing to their high affinity for SSTR2. However, due to some limitations (i.e., high physiological uptake such as in the liver, lack of detection of smaller lesions, low resolution of gammacameras) that may decrease the diagnostic efficacy, positron emission tomography (PET) with 68Ga‐1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane1,4,7,10‐tetraacetic acid (DOTA)‐conjugated peptides has largely replaced conventional scintigraphy, offering higher resolution, greater diagnostic accuracy, reduced radiation exposure, and improved patient compliance. 14 The most commonly used 68Ga‐DOTA‐conjugated peptides are [68Ga‐DOTA0‐Tyr3] octreotide (68Ga‐DOTATOC), [68Ga‐DOTA0‐1NaI3]octreotide (68Ga‐DOTANOC) and [68Ga‐DOTA0‐Tyr3]octreotate (68Ga‐DOTATATE). These radiopharmaceuticals exhibit high affinity not only for SSTR2A, but also for SSTR5 (68Ga‐DOTATOC) and SSTR3/SSTR5 (68Ga‐DOTANOC). 15 , 16 In addition, 64Cu‐DOTATATE has also been used in NEN patients. 17 Although these above‐mentioned radiopeptides function as receptor agonists for SSTR, some other radiopeptides with antagonist activity on SSTR have recently been proposed. In preliminary studies, these radiolabeled antagonists show a higher tumor uptake due to higher affinity binding to SSTR2 as compared to the agonists. 18 , 19
Along with SSTR, NENs can be imaged by targeting other molecular and metabolic pathways due to their NE functional features. In this scenario, catecholaminergic tracers (both gamma and beta emitters) such as 123I/124I‐metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I/124I‐mIBG), 18F‐3,4‐dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F‐DOPA), meta‐hydroxyephedrine (11C‐HED), and meta‐[18F]fluorobenzylguanidine ([18F]mFBG) can be used in tumors with low/variable SSTR expression and exploit their function in medullary thyroid cancer, midgut NEN, neuroblastoma (NB), or paraganglioma (PGL), and in patients with doubt for synchrone/metachrone metastatic malignancy (e.g., breast cancer). 16
In addition, a number of other molecular imaging probes are in development, including radiolabeled glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor ligands, which show particular promise in imaging insulinoma 20 ; radiolabeled agonists interacting with the chemokine receptor, CXCR4, which is frequently overexpressed in high‐proliferating/advanced tumors, including small cell lung cancer (SCLC) 21 ; 68Ga‐DOTA‐labeled cholecystokinin (CCK) 2 receptor ligands for imaging medullary thyroid cancer and SCLC 22 , 23 ; radiolabeled bombesin receptor (also known as gastrin‐releasing peptide receptor [GRPR ligands, agonists/antagonists]; BB1, BB2, and BB3 receptors) which can image a large range of tumors (prostate, colon, breast, central nervous system tumors, NETs) 24 ; and radiolabeled ligands that interact with vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase‐activating polypeptide (PACAP) receptors (VPAC1, VPAC2, PAC) and with the glucose‐dependent insulinotropic‐polypeptide receptor. 25 In this scenario, fibroblast activation protein inhibitor used for PET imaging and targeting tumor microenvironment has also been investigated in NEN patients.
Finally, 18F‐2‐fluorodeoxyglucose (18F‐FDG) PET/CT plays a key role in the NENs scenario. In addition to its proven role as a prognostic marker, 18F‐FDG PET could provide important information on tumor heterogeneity, guide treatment decisions (i.e., combination/alternative treatment), and provide information on disease progression, thereby impacting patient management.
1.2. From imaging to treatment of NENs through different radioisotopes
PRRT with SSAs was first introduced into clinical practice in 1992 by the Rotterdam group, employing high activities of 111In‐pentetreotide. 26 However, the therapeutic efficacy of this radiopharmaceutical was limited by the very low energy (<1 keV) released by the Auger‐emitter indium‐111 in a sphere of just a few cubic nanometers (with a range of about 80–200 nm). As a result, isotopes with higher energy and longer penetration range, such as Yttrium‐90, were introduced. The beta particles emitted by 90Y (maximum energy 2.27 MeV, maximum penetration range in soft tissue 11 mm, half‐life 64 h) enable the direct killing of SSTR‐positive cells while also producing a cross‐fire effect, targeting nearby receptor‐negative tumor cells. Additionally, since 2000, the chelate analog [DOTA0,Tyr3]‐octreotate (DOTA‐TATE), with sixfold‐ to ninefold higher affinity for SSTR2, was introduced. It can be labeled with the β‐γ emitter Lutetium‐177 (maximum energy β‐0.49 MeV, maximum penetration range β‐particle penetration depths in soft tissue 1.7 mm, half‐life 6.7 days), providing similar efficacy to 90Y‐labeled radiopharmaceuticals but with presumably lower toxicity, particularly to the kidneys. 1 In recent years, the need to enhance PRRT outcomes has led to the development of targeted alpha therapy (TAT). These new radiopharmaceuticals emit high‐energy (5–9 MeV) but short‐range (40–100 μm) alpha particles, inducing cell death by double‐stranded DNA breaks, thereby minimizing systemic side effects. Various therapeutic radionuclides have been investigated, such as Bismuth‐213 (213Bi), Actinium‐225 (225Ac), Terbium‐149 (149Tb), and Lead‐212 (212Pb). This emerging therapeutic approach holds promise in overcoming the limitations of β‐emitting radiopharmaceuticals. 27
2. SEARCH STRATEGY
A PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar search of the published literature was performed using a combination of the search terms “peptide receptor radionuclide therapy,” “PRRT,” “neuroendocrine neoplasm,” “NEN,” “neuroendocrine tumor,” “177Lu‐DOTATATE,” “90Y‐DOTATOC,” “alpha emitters,” “pulmonary carcinoid,” “lung neuroendocrine,” “paraganglioma,” “pheochromocitoma,” “medullary thyroid cancer,” “meningioma,” “thyroid carcinoid,” “pulmonary neuroendocrine,” “medullary thyroid cancer,” “neuroblastoma,” “medulloblastoma,” “pituitary,” “Merkel cell carcinoma,” “SSTR‐targeted therapy,” until August 2024. Additional literature was retrieved from the reference lists of all identified articles. After screening titles and abstracts and reading full texts, only articles with more than 10 patients and with homogeneous treated cohort (per tumor type) were included. However, for tumors with less evidence available, smaller sample studies and case reports were also considered.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Lung NENs
Lung NENs are a heterogeneous group of pulmonary neoplasms showing NE morphology and immunophenotype. According to the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, lung NENs were divided into four entities: typical carcinoid (TC), atypical carcinoid (AC), small‐cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and large‐cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). 36 In addition, combined NE and non‐NE carcinomas also exist. 37 Carcinoids correspond to well‐differentiated NENs and include low‐grade (i.e., TC) and intermediate‐grade tumors (i.e., AC), while NECs correspond to high‐grade carcinomas and include SCLC and LCNEC. 36 Many efforts have been made to unify the lung NENs terminology with the WHO terminology for GEPNENs. 37 Namely, despite the differences in the anatomical sites, these tumor entities belong to the same family and should theoretically follow the same management used for NENs.
It was reported that SSTR2A is the SSTR subtype most frequently expressed immunohistochemically in lung NENs (72%), followed by SSTR1 (63%), SSTR5 (40%), and SSTR3 (20%). 38
The current guideline 39 recommends cold SSAs as the first‐line treatment for lung carcinoids. Everolimus is advised as first‐line therapy for AC or as second‐line therapy for TC and progressive lung carcinoids following SSAs. In the RADIANT‐4 trial, 40 81% of patients receiving everolimus achieved disease stabilization according to RECIST 1.1, compared to 64% in the placebo group, with improved progression‐free survival (PFS) (11.0 months vs. 3.9 months). Alternative treatments include temozolomide ± capecitabine, IFN‐α, PRRT, and platinum‐based chemotherapy, though no clear consensus exists due to the lack of clinical trials. 39
Lung NENs are often included in cohorts of patients treated with PRRT along with other GEPNENs, 41 and only a few studies have focused exclusively on the role of PRRT in lung NENs (Table 1). In 2016, Mariniello et al. retrospectively studied one of the largest cohorts of 118 patients with unresectable/metastatic bronchopulmonary carcinoid who received 177Lu‐DOTATATE (n = 48), 90Y‐DOTATOC (n = 45), or a combination thereof (n = 21). Median progression‐free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 28.0 and 58.8 months, respectively. Morphologic responses (partial responses + minor responses) were reached in 26.5% of patients and were associated with longer OS and PFS, with the combination of 90Y‐DOTATOC plus 177Lu‐DOTATATE protocol achieving the highest overall response rate (ORR, 38.1%). 28 The study is, however, affected by a selection bias due to the inclusion of patients with different disease aggressiveness, along with the heterogeneity of the treatment scheme adopted. In addition, full biochemical data were not consistently available after PRRT, potentially missing toxicity assessment. 28 In the same year, Ianniello and colleagues reported on 34 patients who received four/five cycles of 177Lu‐DOTATATE. The overall disease control rate (DCR) was 62%, the mPFS was 18.5 months (95% CI, 12.9–26.4 months) and the mOS was 48.6 months (95% CI, 26.4–68.9 months), resulting in a better mPFS (20.1 months vs. 15.7 months) and mOS (48.6 months vs. 37 months) in patients with TC compared to AC. No significant acute or delayed toxicities (CTCAE Grade 3 or 4) were reported. 29 Conversely, in the study by Sabet et al. investigating 22 patients with metastatic, unresectable pulmonary NET who underwent PRRT with 177Lu‐DOTATATE (mean activity of 7.8 ± 0.68 GBq), relevant hematotoxicity (Grade 3) was observed in 3 patients (13.6%) at 3–10 weeks after at least one of the administrations, although no significant nephrotoxicity (≥ Grade 3) was observed during the follow‐up. Similar DCR (68.1%), mPFS (27 months, 95% CI, 9–45) and mOS (42 months, 95% CI, 25–59) were reported. 30
TABLE 1.
Characteristics of the included studies on lung neuroendocrine neoplasms.
| Author, year (ref) | n | RF | Response (%) | Outcome (months) | Toxicity (G3/G4), n | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORR | DCR | mPFS | mOS | ||||
| Mariniello et al., 2016 28 | 118 |
177Lu‐DOTATATE 90Y‐DOTATOC |
26.5 | 67.3 | 28.0 | 58.8 |
2 G3 anemia 3 G3 leucopenia 2 G3 thrombocytopenia |
| Ianniello et al., 2016 29 | 34 | 177Lu‐DOTATATE | 15 | 62 | 18.5 | 48.6 | No |
| Sabet et al., 2017 30 | 22 | 177Lu‐DOTATATE | 27.3 | 68.2 | 27.0 | 42.0 | 3 G3 hematotoxicity (NS) |
| Mirvis et al., 2020 31 | 25 |
177Lu‐DOTATATE 90Y‐DOTATOC |
40 | 88 | 17.0 | 42.0 |
1 G3 thrombocytopenia 1 G3 pericarditis |
| Minutoli et al., 2021 32 | 14 |
177Lu‐DOTATATE 90Y‐DOTATOC/TATE 111In‐Pentetreotide |
21 | 71 | — | — | No |
| Parghane et al., 2017 33 | 22 | 177Lu‐DOTATATE |
31 (RECIST 1.1) 37 (18F‐FDG + 68Ga‐DOTATOC) |
68 (RECIST 1.1) 53 (18F‐FDG + 68Ga‐DOTATOC) |
— | 40.0 | No hematotoxicity |
| Lim et al., 2020 34 | 48 | 177Lu‐DOTATATE | 33 | 83 | — | 49.0 |
2 G3‐5 hematotoxicity (NS) 1 G3 nausea 1 AML 1 acute kidney injury 1 superior vena cava obstruction |
| Zidan et al., 2022 35 | 48 | 177Lu‐DOTATATE |
20 (RECIST 1.1) 44 (68Ga‐DOTATOC) |
88 (RECIST 1.1) 88 (68Ga‐DOTATOC) |
23.0 | 59.0 |
1 G3 leucopenia 6 G3 lymphopenia |
Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; DCR, disease control rate; mOS, median overall survival; mPFS, median progression‐free survival; NS, not specified; ORR, overall response rate.
Regarding the clinical response profile, single‐center 31 , 32 , 33 or multicenter 34 studies reported significant improvement of symptoms in more than half of treated patients. Specifically, in the Australian multicenter study, the authors showed a significant benefit when considering both patients with secretory symptoms, such as flushing and diarrhea, and those with non‐secretory symptoms, including pain and dyspnea. 33 Similarly, Parghane et al. retrospectively analyzed 22 patients with symptomatic disease prior to PRRT. They reported symptomatic response in up to 79% of patients. In addition, a biochemical response was also demonstrated in 53% of cases. 33 However, symptom evaluation was based on retrospective review of medical records, and quality of life (QOL) questionnaires were not used, limiting the generalizability of results.
Response assessment in NEN is currently controversial due to the lack of standardized methods for assessing response to PRRT, 42 leading to significant differences in the criteria used between studies. Several authors observed a discrepancy between morphological (i.e., computed tomography [CT]) and metabolic (i.e., 68Ga‐DOTATOC and/or 18F‐FDG PET/CT) imaging when assessing response in the same group of patients. 33 , 35
The reliability of the conclusions is limited by the small sample size and the retrospective design of most of the included studies. Moreover, the variability in disease aggressiveness, differences in treatment approaches (90Y‐ and/or 177Lu‐based PRRT), and previous and/or simultaneous treatments varied greatly with regard to type, modality, and timing across study cohorts. In addition, comparisons within studies should be approached with caution, as treatment protocols, dosages, and fractionation strategies were largely empirical and varied not only between studies but also within each patient cohort.
3.2. Metastatic PGL
PGL belongs to non‐epithelial NEN characterized by a strong genetic predisposition, involving mutations in more than 20 different genes, either germline or sporadic. 54 , 55 Among these, germline mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase enzyme complex (SDHx) genes are among the most common causes of PGL, occurring in up to 25% of cases. 56 , 57 In 2022, the WHO classification designated pheochromocytoma (PCC) as a subtype of intra‐adrenal PGL, originating from chromaffin cells in the adrenal medulla, accounting for 80%–85% of neural crest‐derived tumors. The remaining 15%–20% includes sympathetic abdominal PGL, sympathetic head and neck PGL, and parasympathetic PGL. 58
The therapeutic strategy for metastatic PGL is primarily aimed at controlling excessive catecholamine secretion and tumor burden, as there are no curative treatment options. Therapeutic alternatives include watch‐and‐wait (including alpha‐blockers to manage hypertension), locoregional therapies, radionuclide treatment, systemic chemotherapy, and molecular targeted therapies. 59 Historically, the treatment of metastatic PGL with radionuclide therapy has primarily involved the 123I‐MIBG/131I‐MIBG thera(g)nostic pair, with clinical trials reporting objective responses in 23% of cases according to the RECIST. 60 , 61
However, it has also been demonstrated that PGLs commonly overexpress SSTRs, predominantly SSTR2, 4 , 55 particularly those pseudohypoxic subtypes related to tricarboxylic acid cycle mutations, 62 supporting the thera(g)nostic use of SSA (Table 2 and Figure 1). Comparisons between different radionuclide therapies, including 90Y‐DOTATATE, 177Lu‐DOTATATE, and 131I‐MIBG, did not show a clear advantage of one radiopharmaceutical over the others. 44 , 52 However, receptor expression varies between patients, and up to 50% of patients have been shown to be ineligible for both therapies. 52 Thus, the treatment strategy in PGL (as well as for other NEN tumors) should always be guided by the extent and intensity of disease defined through pre‐therapeutic 123I‐MIBG and SSTR imaging.
TABLE 2.
PGL and PRRT (177Lu‐/90Y‐DOTA‐TATE/TOC).
| Author, year (ref) | Patients | Disease control | Treatment cycles | Median PFS (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forrer et al., 2008 43 | 28 | 20/28 (71%) | 1–4 | ‐ |
| Nastos et al., 2017 44 | 13 | 13/13 (100%) | 1–4 | 38.5 |
| Kong et al., 2017 45 | 20 | 15/17 (88%) | 1–4 | 39.0 |
| Zandee et al., 2019 46 | 30 | 27/30 (90%) | 4 | 30.0 |
| Vyakaranam et al., 2019 47 | 22 | 2/22 (100%) | 3–11 | 21.6 |
| Kolasinska‐Cwikla et al., 2019 48 | 13 | 10/12 (83%) | 2–5 | 35.0 |
| Jaiswal et al., 2020 49 | 15 | 12/15 (80%) | 1–6 | Not reached |
| Severi et al., 2021 50 | 47 | 37/46 (80%) | 5 | Not reached |
| Nilica et al., 2021 51 | 19 | 8/16 (50%) | 2–5 | 96.0 |
| Prado‐Wohlwend et al., 2022 52 | 17 | 9/10 (88%) | 1–4 | 29.0 |
| Rubino et al., 2024 53 | 30 | 26/30 (87%) | 2–8 | 5‐y PFS: 68% (95% CI, 48–82) |
Abbreviations: PFS, progression‐free survival; PGL, paraganglioma; PRRT, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.
FIGURE 1.

A 52‐year‐old female patient with metastatic pheochromocytoma treated with 177Lu‐DOTATATE. 68Ga‐DOTATOC PET/CT study prior to (A) and after (B) three cycles of 177Lu‐DOTATATE treatment (cumulated activity 21.30 GBq). The post‐treatment 18F‐FDG PET/CT (C) confirmed the sites of the disease and showed an overall partial response to treatment. The patient progressed 14 months after the end of PRRT and died 20 months after the end of treatment. PET, positron emission tomography; PRRT, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.
As regards PRRT alone, in 2008 Forrer et al. reported on 28 patients with inoperable PGL, including 9 with PCC and 19 with non‐surgically curable PGL, treated with up to 4 cycles of 90Y/177Lu‐DOTATOC. Among the 26 patients who completed treatment, 2 showed PR, 5 had minor response (MR), and 13 achieved SD, resulting in a DCR of 77%. The treatment was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported. 43 Concerning symptomatic and biochemical responses to treatment, a bicentric study from Australia reviewed 20 patients with unresectable PGL treated with 177Lu‐DOTATATE, receiving a median cumulative activity of 22 GBq (1–4 cycles). Nine patients also received radiosensitizing chemotherapy. After treatment, 62% of patients could de‐escalate medications for symptom management, and 86% showed a reduction in CgA levels, with 58% experiencing a reduction of more than 50%. A decrease in plasma metadrenaline and normetadrenaline levels occurred in most patients with secondary hypertension. Although the biochemical marker CgA was assessed in most patients, serum or urine catecholamine levels were not routinely measured in one of the two centers involved, so these results should be taken with caution. In the same study, the authors reported Grade 2 lymphopenia as the most common toxicity, while four patients developed Grade 3 lymphopenia and two had Grade 3 thrombocytopenia. One patient with pre‐existing renal impairment experienced further deterioration, though no dialysis was required, and another patient with chronic renal failure had a decline in renal function due to systemic amyloidosis rather than PRRT. No additional toxicities were seen in patients who received radiosensitizing chemotherapy; however, any additional effectiveness of the combined treatment was difficult to prove due to the limited number of patients. 45 In a separate 2019 study by the Rotterdam group involving 30 patients (17 parasympathetic PGL, 10 sympathetic PGL, 3 metastatic PCC), Grades 3–4 subacute hematotoxicity occurred in 20% of patients, and 1 developed myelodysplastic syndrome after 6 cycles of 177Lu‐DOTATATE. 46 Conversely, Vyakaranam et al. in 22 patients (13 PCCs, 9 PGLs) treated with 177Lu‐DOTATATE (median activity 29.6 GBq) showed that, though common (73%), hematological side effects were generally mild (Grades 1–2); however, with the limitation of a short follow‐up (up to 3 months after the last treatment). The authors also reported a mOS of 49.6 months, and mPFS of 21.6 months, with 2 patients achieving PR, while 20 achieved SD. Biochemical responses were >50% catecholamine reduction in 25% and >50% CgA reduction in 40% of patients, respectively. Longer OS and PFS were observed in patients with Ki‐67 <15% and in those receiving PRRT as first‐line therapy. 47 Among other predictive factors of PRRT response, germline mutations in SDHD or SDHB genes were also studied. 48 To note, there are five PGL–PCC syndromes associated with heterozygous germline mutations in genes encoding the subunits of the succinate dehydrogenase enzyme complex. 63 In a prospective, single‐institution open‐label, Phase II study on 13 PGL patients treated with 90Y‐DOTATATE, the authors reported significant differences in terms of mOS and mPFS between patients with PGL1–SDHD gene mutation compared to subjects with PGL4–SDHB gene mutation (p = 0.05 and p = 0.014, respectively). 48 In addition, the baseline 68Ga‐DOTATOC SUVmax also showed to be significantly associated with response with the area under the curve of 0.939 (p = 0.024). Namely, a SUVmax of >21 had a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.80–1.00) and specificity of 1.0 (95% CI, 0.29–1.00) to predict response to PRRT. 49
In 2021, Severi et al. prospectively enrolled 47 patients with metastatic PGLs, treated with 90Y‐DOTATOC (n = 12, median cumulative activity 9.2 GBq) or with 177Lu‐DOTATATE (n = 34, median cumulative activity 24.42 GBq). The authors demonstrated a better mOS with 177Lu‐DOTATATE compared to 90Y‐DOTATOC (143 months vs. 92 months), probably due to the higher affinity of tyr3‐octreotate for SSTR2 receptors, with a consequent longer tumor residence time of 177Lu‐DOTATATE. The DCR was higher in patients without risk factors (overall DCR ~80%) compared to those treated with reduced cumulative activity who presented risk factors for bone marrow and/or renal toxicity (i.e., DCR 33.3% and 55% for patients treated with 90Y‐DOTATOC and 177Lu‐DOTATATE, respectively). 50 In a dosimetry‐based study, Nilica et al. showed that from 19 patients with PGL, 13 patients received 90Y‐DOTATOC PRRT in 1–4 cycles. The estimated tumor dose ranged between 4.6 and 152.8 Gy (mean 51.1 Gy, median 38.3 Gy) resulting in a stabilization of the disease in most patients after three therapy cycles with approximately 3.7 GBq 90Y‐DOTATOC each. 51 Recently, Rubino et al. published retrospective data on 22 PGL and 8 PCC patients followed up for 8.9 years. The 5‐year and 10‐year PFS was 68% (95% CI, 48–82) and 53% (95% CI, 33–69), respectively. The 5‐year and 10‐year OS was 75% (95% CI, 54–87) and 59% (95% CI, 38–75), respectively. Persistent late toxicity occurred in one patient (G3 anemia; G2 leucopenia). Only 3 patients developed persistent mild chronic kidney disease after treatment. 53 At the time of writing, the National Cancer Institute is sponsoring an open‐label, single‐arm, multicenter Phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of 177Lu‐DOTATATE in SSTR‐positive PGL/PCC (NCT03206060). Results of the study are expected in 2027.
3.3. Medullary thyroid carcinoma
Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a NE/endocrine tumor originating from the neural crest and arising from the parafollicular C‐cells. About 80% of cases are sporadic, while the rest are divided into three familial forms: multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) Type 2A, MEN Type 2B, and familial MTC not associated with MEN. 69
Currently, the treatment of advanced or metastatic MTC primarily consists of cabozantinib and vandetanib, two antiangiogenic multikinase inhibitors (MKIs). 70 These therapies offer an objective response rate of up to 45% and have been demonstrated to improve PFS and OS compared to placebo. 71 There is limited evidence supporting the use of chemotherapy or radionuclide therapy in MTC patients; however, these options may be considered when MKIs are contraindicated. 70
In vitro data demonstrated SSTR expression by MTC cells in more than 75% of cases (SSTR2 91.6%, SSTR5 75%, SSTR3 41.6%, and SSTR1 33.3%), 72 later confirmed by in vivo analysis using SSTR‐based imaging. 73 Since the early 2000s, some clinical experience with Auger emitters has been reported, though it remains limited to case studies. 74 , 75 Most available evidence is based on beta emitters, but studies involving more than 10 patients are still scarce (Table 3). A meta‐analysis published in 2020 evaluating a total of 98 patients with MTC treated with various PRRT schemes showed an ORR of 8.5% (95% CI, 1.9%–19.2%), while a DCR of 60% (95% CI, 49.6%–69.8%), with a 2.8% rate of serious adverse events. 76 The therapeutic efficacy of 90Y‐DOTATOC was retrospectively evaluated by Bodei et al. in 21 metastatic MTC treated with a median cumulative activity of 10.4 GBq (range, 7.5–19.2) given in 4 cycles (range, 2–8). Most of these patients had previously been treated only with cold SSAs; however, the cohort also included patients treated with multiple lines of therapy prior to 90Y‐DOTATOC. The treatment was well tolerated, with only one case of Grade 3 hematological toxicity. Morphological CR was documented only in two patients, and no PR was observed. Biochemical evaluation (i.e., calcitonin and CEA) confirmed progression in 57% of patients. 64 The Basel group in a Phase II, single‐center, open‐label trial investigated the response, survival, and safety profile of 90Y‐DOTATOC in 31 progressive metastatic MTC. A post‐therapeutic prolongation of calcitonin doubling time of at least 100% was found in 18 of 31 participants (58.1%). Among these, decreasing calcitonin levels were found in nine patients (29.0%) following treatment. In responders, the median reduction of serum calcitonin was 45.2% (range, 0.4%–96.3%). The mOS was 91 months (range, 2.2–373.1 months) from the time of diagnosis and 15.7 months (range, 1.4–107.0 months) from the time of the first 90Y‐DOTATOC treatment, with responders showing a significantly longer mOS as compared with nonresponders. In addition, higher cumulative activities of 90Y‐DOTATOC were associated with a nonsignificant trend toward longer survival outcomes. Only one case (3.2%) of Grade 3 acute, transient thrombocytopenia was observed. However, six patients (19.4%) experienced renal toxicity of any grade, with one case of Grade 4 renal toxicity occurring 25.8 months after therapy. These results, though promising, were derived from a single study cohort. In addition, the authors were not able to define pretherapeutic markers of post‐therapeutic response. 65 As regards prognostication of response to therapy, another study found high uptake on the 111In‐DTPA‐octreotide scans (uptake grade ≥3) and moderate‐to‐positive SSTR2A receptor expression on histological examination to be associated with DCR after treatment. 66
TABLE 3.
177Lu‐/90Y‐DOTA‐TATE/TOC in medullary thyroid cancer.
| Author, year (ref) | n | RF | Response (%) | Outcome (months) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORR | DCR | mPFS | mOS | |||
| Bodei et al., 2004 64 | 21 | 90Y‐DOTATOC | 10 | 67 | n.a. | n.a. |
| Iten et al., 2007 65 | 31 | 90Y‐DOTATOC | ‐ | n.a. | n.a. | 91.0 |
| Beukhof et al., 2019 66 | 10 | 177Lu‐DOTATATE | / | 40 | 8.4 | 26.0 |
| Parghane et al., 2020 67 | 43 | 177Lu‐DOTATATE |
4 (RECIST 1.1) 10 (18F‐FDG + 68Ga‐DOTATOC) |
58 (RECIST 1.1) 61 (18F‐FDG + 68Ga‐DOTATOC) |
24.0 | 26.0 |
| Liu et al., 2023 68 | 28 |
177Lu‐DOTATATE 90Y‐DOTATOC |
12 | 56 | 10.1 | 63.7 |
Abbreviations: DCR:disease control rate; mOS, median overall survival; mPFS, median progression‐free survival; n.a., not assessed; ORR, overall response rate.
Most recently, Parghane et al. investigated 43 patients with SSTR‐positive metastatic MTC, who received PRRT with 177Lu‐DOTATATE. Out of 43 patients, two had a positive family history of MTC and were diagnosed with MEN2A. Of those patients with MEN2A, one had undergone surgical excision of PCC and parathyroid glands, and 12/43 had received EBRT before PRRT. All patients were symptomatic before the start of PRRT. The mPFS was 24 months (95% CI, 15.1–32.9 months) from the time of the first 177Lu‐DOTATATE treatment. A significantly longer PFS from the time of the first 177Lu‐DOTATATE treatment was found in patients with a calcitonin doubling time (CtnDT) of more than 24 months as compared to patients with less than 24 months CtnDT (mPFS not reached vs. 10 months, p < 0.001). The mOS was 26 months (95% CI, 16.6–35.3 months) from the time of the first 177Lu‐DOTATATE treatment. Similarly, patients having more than 24 months CtnDT had a significantly longer OS as compared to patients with less than 24 months CtnDT (mOS 60 months vs. 20 months, p < 0.001). Based on symptomatic and biochemical response evaluation criteria, 22/43 patients were responders (51%) and 21/43 were nonresponders (49%) to PRRT. Based on RECIST 1.1 criteria, 2/43 (4%) patients had PR, 25/43 (58%) patients had SD, and 16/43 (38%) patients had PD. However, differences in tumor burden prior to PRRT and inter‐ and intra‐patient variation in FDG uptake may reflect differences in tumor aggressiveness among the patients included in the study. 67 In 2023, Liu et al. reported on 28 patients with progressive, SSTR‐positive advanced MTC who received PRRT with 177Lu‐ or 90Y‐labeled SSAs. The authors also identified the presence of bone metastases as a significant prognostic factor associated with poor OS and PFS. 68
3.4. Progressive/metastatic meningioma
Meningiomas originate from the arachnoid cells located on the inner surface of the dura, with the latter originating from meningeal precursor cells derived from mesoderm and neural crest. 83 , 84 The WHO classification distinguishes meningiomas into three grades, according to different histological patterns: low‐grade meningioma (WHO‐I) and high‐grade meningioma (WHO‐II and WHO‐III). 85
Inoperable or recurrent tumors can be treated with radiosurgery or with fractionated radiotherapy. 86 Because of their limited efficacy, systemic therapies are chosen on an individual basis once surgical and radiation possibilities have been exhausted. 86 , 87
Based on the high density of SSTR (especially Type 2) in more than ~90% of meningiomas, diagnostics and therapy (thera(g)nostics) of this tumor entity can be obtained with radiolabeled SSAs. 88 , 89 , 90 Also in this setting, most of the available literature is based on beta emitters (Table 4) 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 although some groups have also used the auger emitter In‐111. 91 In a meta‐analysis of 111 patients, DCR was achieved in 63% of cases. The 6‐month PFS rates were 94%, 48%, and 0% for Grades I, II, and III, respectively. The 1‐year OS rates were 88%, 71%, and 52% for Grades I, II, and III, respectively. 92 In 2009, Bartolomei et al. evaluated 29 meningioma patients who underwent 90Y‐DOTATOC for 2–6 cycles for a cumulative activity of 5–15 GBq. Post‐treatment MRI performed 3 months after completion of treatment showed disease stabilization in 19 of 29 patients (66%) and progressive disease in the remaining 10 (34%). Better results were obtained in patients with Grade I meningiomas than in those with Grades II–III, with a median time to progression of 61 months in the low‐grade group and 13 months in the high‐grade group. 77 Similarly, Marincek et al. reported on 34 patients treated with 90Y‐ and/or 177Lu‐DOTATOC. A total of 74 treatment cycles (1–4 cycles per patient) were performed, including 66 cycles of 90Y‐DOTATOC (range, 1.5–18.3 GBq) and 8 cycles of 177Lu‐DOTATOC (range, 7.4–22.2 GBq). Disease stabilization was achieved in 23 treated patients (66%), who also experienced prolonged survival compared to PD patients. However, severe hematotoxicity (three patients) and severe renal toxicity (one patient) were also reported. 79 A higher rate of disease control (86.7%) was shown by Gerster‐Gilliéron et al. in 15 patients with recurrent or progressive meningiomas treated with systemic 90Y‐DOTATOC (7.4 MBq/m2 in 2 fractions) with no Grade 4 toxicities reported. However, the study included 60% of patients with low‐grade meningiomas. 80 The main side effects reported by other authors are related to transient hematotoxicity, such as anemia (22%), leukopenia (13%), lymphocytopenia (24%), and thrombocytopenia (17%). 92 In this regard, Minczeles et al. in 15 meningioma patients treated with 177Lu‐DOTATATE (administered activity of 7.4 GBq/cycle up to 4 cycles) reported at least one type of subacute hepatic or hematologic toxicity in 13/15 (87%) patients: Grade 1 in 10 (67%) patients, Grade 2 in 4 (27%) patients, Grade 3 in 8 (53%) patients, and Grade 4 in 1 (7%) patient. Severe Grade 3 or 4 toxicity consisted only of lymphocytopenia. 81 Lymphocytopenia was also confirmed by other authors as the most common adverse event. 82 Considering that absorbed dose estimations at the organs at risk were largely within safety limits, 93 , 94 , 95 it is expected that treatment schedules could be significantly optimized based on dosimetry. 96
TABLE 4.
Meningioma (177Lu‐/90Y‐DOTATATE/TOC).
| Author, year (ref) | Patients | Disease control | Treatment cycles | Median PFS (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bartolomei et al., 2009 77 | 29 | 19/29 (66%) | 2–6 | 6.0 |
| Gerster‐Gilliéron et al., 2015 78 | 15 | 13/15 (86.7%) | 2 | 24.0 |
| Marincek et al., 2015 79 | 34 | 23/34 (65.6%) | 1–4 | ‐ |
| Seystahl et al., 2016 80 | 20 | 10/20 (50%) | 3 | 5.4 |
| Minczeles et al., 2023 81 | 15 | 6/15 (40%) | 1–4 | 7.8 |
| Kurz et al., 2024 82 | 14 | 9/14 (64%) | 1–4 | 8.2 |
In the current evolving scenario, it is important to interpret existing data cautiously, as significant changes in tumor grading and classification over recent decades limit the applicability of previous findings to the current molecular diagnostic framework. 97 Moreover, response assessment has been highly heterogeneous across published studies. The typically slow growth rate of meningiomas further complicates response evaluation, especially considering the short follow‐up periods in many studies. 97 Recently, the RANO working group proposed standardized MRI‐based response criteria. 98 In addition, although a framework for PET‐based response assessment is not yet available, the joint EANM/EANO/RANO/SNMMI practice guideline recommends using SSTR‐based imaging alongside MRI. 88
The first randomized clinical trial comparing 177Lu‐DOTATATE with standard of care (LUMEN, NCT06326190) has recently begun recruitment, and results are eagerly awaited. Figure 2 shows a case example of a patient with multiple meningiomas treated with PRRT.
FIGURE 2.

A 29‐year‐old patient suffering from neurofibromatosis Type II with multiple meningiomas and vestibular schwannoma. The patient underwent four cycles of 177Lu‐DOTATATE with a total administered activity of 29.97 GBq until April 2023. Pre‐treatment MRI and 68Ga‐DOTATOC PET/CT (A) showed multiple meningiomas, mostly supratentorial. Post‐treatment images (B) showed a minor response to PRRT. Fourteen months after the last course of therapy, the patient is still stable on imaging evaluation. PET, positron emission tomography; PRRT, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.
3.5. Radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma
Radioiodine therapy is one of the cornerstones in the management of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) following surgery; however, 5%–15% of patients become refractory to RAI, with a poor prognosis. 70 Based on SELECT 99 and DECISION 100 trials, lenvatinib and sorafenib (i.e., MKIs drugs) are considered the standard first‐line systemic therapy for radioiodine refractory DTC (RAIR‐DTC). 99
From the early 1990s, SSTR2 and SSTR5 expression was demonstrated in DTC, as well as in normal thyroid tissue. 101 , 102 SSTR2 is the predominant subtype in thyroid epithelial tumors with a high expression pattern, in particular, in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). 103 Compared to MTC and other neural crest‐derived carcinomas, limited data exist on the use of PRRT in RAIR‐DTC. In 2005, Gabriel et al. reported on five patients with recurrent/persistent DTC who received three/four cycles (1850 MBq/cycle) of 90Y‐DOTATOC. All patients presented with metastatic disease with more than one site affected, and stabilization of the disease was achieved for at least 5 months in all patients. 104 Furthermore, in 2018, Roll et al. evaluated five patients with RAIR‐DTC who underwent 177Lu‐DOTATATE therapy (mean injected activity: 7.0 ± 0.7 GBq). After 2–4 therapy cycles, only one patient showed PR, whereas the remaining four progressed. 105 A previous study by Czepczyński et al. reported on 90Y‐DOTATOC (total activity of 14.8 GBq in 4 therapy cycles) administered to six patients with RAIR‐DTC. Morphological response evaluated 3 months after the last treatment using RECIST criteria showed PR in one patient, SD in two patients, and PD in three patients. Biochemical response based on Tg measurements showed PR in one patient in agreement with imaging results, SD in four patients, and PD in one patient. However, most patients progressed within 1 year following PRRT. The mOS was 21 months from the first course of PRRT. No high‐grade hematological or renal toxicities were reported. 106 Versari et al. prospectively enrolled 41 patients with progressive RAIR‐DTC, 11 of whom were also treated with PRRT receiving a fractionated injection of 1.5–3.7 GBq 90Y‐DOTATOC/administration. The response assessed by 68Ga‐DOTATOC PET/CT performed 3 months after the end of treatment was PR in 2/11 patients, SD in 5/11, while PD was observed in 4 cases. 107 In a clinical Phase II, single‐center, open‐label trial, Iten et al. investigated response, survival, and the safety profile of 90Y‐DOTATOC treatment in 24 progressive RAIR‐DTC patients. A total of 58 cycles of 90Y‐DOTATOC (1–4 cycles per patient) were performed with a median cumulative activity of 13.0 GBq (range, 5.6–30.3 GBq). Decreasing Tg levels upon treatment with 90Y‐DOTATOC were found in seven (29.2%) patients. In these responders, the median reduction of serum Tg was 48.9% (range, 0.3%–54.5%), whereas in the nonresponders, the median increase of serum thyroglobulin was 36.8% (range, 2.6%–4912.8%). The mOS was 33.4 months (range, 3.6–126.8 months) from the time of diagnosis and 16.8 months (range, 1.8–99.1 months) from the time of the first 90Y‐DOTATOC treatment. Regarding the safety profile, eight (33.3%) patients developed hematologic toxicity: two (8.3%) patients developed acute transient leucopenia (one Grade 1 and one Grade 2), three (12.5%) patients developed acute transient thrombocytopenia (one Grade 1 and two Grade 3) and three (12.5%) patients developed anemia Grade 1. Four (16.7%) patients experienced permanent renal toxicity (two Grade 1, one Grade 2, and one Grade 4) at 3, 6, 7, and 11 months after therapy. 108 To the best of our knowledge, neither the subsequent Phase III study has been published nor are there any clinical trials actively recruiting patients with RAIR‐DTC to undergo PRRT. Overall, in the systematic review by Lee et al., the authors reported a pooled proportion of patients with ORR of 15.61% (95% CI, 7.80%–26.74%) and DCR of 53.95% (95% CI, 41.13%–66.39%), with a pooled proportion of serious adverse events of 2.82% (95% CI, 0.03%–17.61%). 76
In summary, the published studies are insufficient to establish the efficacy of PRRT in patients with RAIR‐DTC due to the small and heterogeneous patient cohorts. Based on available evidence, the efficacy of PRRT in these patients is limited and referral of patients to MKIs drugs has been favored. It should also be noted that most patients did not complete all treatment cycles, so it is possible that the dose to the tumor was not sufficient to ensure response.
3.6. Pediatric tumors: NB/medulloblastoma
NB is a neural crest‐derived malignancy of the peripheral nervous system and the third most common childhood tumor after leukemia and brain tumors. 109 , 110 The use of PRRT has been investigated in the treatment of NB, which often expresses SSTR. 111 , 112 Namely, various studies based on immunohistochemistry demonstrated the expression of all SSTR1 to SSTR5 on primary NB and, specifically, the overexpression of SSTR2 in the majority of NBs, even in recurrent/refractory tumor disease. 113 , 114 In 2011, Grains et al. first published results on six children with advanced (Stages 3–4) NB treated with two to three cycles of 177Lu‐DOTATATE therapy (4.04–7.5 GBq/kg, 8–10 weeks apart). According to RECIST, five patients obtained SD and one PD. Thrombocytopenia was the most frequent adverse event (n = 3 Grade 3, n = 1 Grade 4). 115 Kong and colleagues in 2015 investigated four patients (3–9 years old) who received PRRT (111In‐DOTATATE, 177Lu‐DOTATATE, 90Y‐DOTATATE or combined). Toxicities were mainly hematological (i.e., thrombocytopenia, n = 1 Grade 4; anemia, n = 1 Grade 4 and n = 1 pancytopenia) occurring in patients heavily pretreated. One patient experienced an early clinical response to 111In‐DOTATATE treatment at the 3‐month assessment, followed by bone progression. In the absence of other therapeutic options, further PRRT was given (one cycle of combined 111In/177Lu‐DOTATATE, plus one cycle of 177Lu‐DOTATATE with oral temozolomide). The other patient had a favorable PR 3 months after the induction of 111In‐DOTATATE therapy, with sustained stability on 68Ga‐DOTATATE PET/CT, and remained clinically stable for 14 months after the first treatment. At progression, further PRRT was administered, including two cycles of 177Lu‐DOTATATE (second cycle with oral etoposide) with almost complete normalization of PET/CT at 3 months. This patient again had imaging relapse and received further 177Lu‐DOTATATE with temozolomide, resulting in a favorable partial response. However, there was evidence of bone marrow progression 2 months later with right thigh pain, and the augmentation of PRRT with further cycles of 177Lu‐DOTATATE (4 GBq) with 90Y‐DOTATATE (1 GBq) was selected rather than combining with chemotherapy. Two patients died due to progressive disease. The authors estimated a median best PFS for PRRT of approximately 10.5 months (2–20 months). 116 Ten years after the study by Grains et al., the results of the LuDo phase IIa trial were then published by the same group. 117 Twenty‐one patients with histologically confirmed relapsed or refractory metastatic high‐risk NB were included. Of the 21 registered, 20 received at least one course of 177Lu‐DOTATATE treatment, with only 8 patients undergoing the full 4 courses of 177Lu‐DOTATATE. There was no treatment‐related mortality; however, 10 serious adverse events were reported in 6 patients, and 1 case of dose‐limiting hematological toxicity was recorded. The median whole‐body radiation absorbed dose was 0.24 Gy (range, 0.14–0.42 Gy) following the first course when the administered activity was 75 MBq/kg, and 0.33 Gy (range, 0.16–0.61 Gy) following subsequent courses when the administered activity was 100 MBq/kg. The median cumulative whole‐body absorbed dose in those patients who received all four courses for whom complete data were available was 1.26 Gy (range, 0.97–1.48 Gy). The median cumulative mean renal radiation dose in the six patients who received four courses of treatment and for whom full dosimetric data were recorded was 16.5 Gy (range, 9.5–21.5 Gy). In 24 measurable lesions, the median tumor dose per course was 2.43 Gy (range, 0.04–13.50 Gy). Of the 20 treated patients, 6 died before response assessment, and none of the remaining 14 evaluable patients showed a response to treatment either by the original or by the revised International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria at 1 month after completion of treatment. In view of this, the trial was closed prematurely. The PFS at 6 months was 38% (95% CI, 18%–58%) and PFS at 12 months was 5% (95% CI, 0%–20%). The OS at 6 months was 62% (95% CI, 38%–79%) and OS at 12 months was 52% (95% CI, 30%–71%). Figure 3 shows a case example of a NB patient treated with PRRT.
FIGURE 3.

Pretreatment 123I‐MIBG (A) and 68Ga‐DOTATOC (B) before treatment with 177Lu‐DOTATATE (C) in a patient with neuroblastoma. A 9‐year‐old female patient with left paravertebral neuroblastoma was diagnosed in 2004. The patient underwent multiple lines of chemotherapy, tumor resection, antibody, angiogenesis inhibitor therapy, and external beam radiotherapy. Following tumor recurrence, she received an HLA bone marrow transplant and a total of 4 cycles of 177Lu‐DOTA‐TATE therapy with a total administered activity of 6.96 GBq. However, the patient progressed and died 6 months after the end of treatment.
Despite the low efficacy provided by the LuDo trial, three new trials are still recruiting. The LuDO‐N trial (NCT04903899, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04903899) is planned to establish whether 177Lu‐DOTATATE can be effective as a single agent in the treatment of relapsed or primary refractory high‐risk NB when the administration schedule is intensified to two infusions delivered 2 weeks apart and the administered activity is personalized by dosimetry. The NEUROBLU 02 (NCT03966651, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03966651) trial uses a dose escalation design to assess the effective dose and the highest dose of 177Lu‐DOTATATE that can be given safely without the need for stem cell re‐infusion. In order to make results from the NEUROBLU 2 and LuDO‐N trials comparable, the dosimetry and response evaluation protocols of these two trials have been harmonized. Another similar multi‐center trial in the United States is already recruiting (NCT04023331). Differently from the previous one, the latter will use the SARTATE, which binds to the SSTR‐2 labeled with 67Cu (β‐emitters).
In addition to NB, the expression of SSTR was also documented in medulloblastoma, the most common malignant intracranial tumor in children. 5 However, clinical experience on the use of PRRT is only anecdotal. 118
3.7. Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors
First identified as pituitary adenoma, the 2021 WHO classifications categorized this entity as a NET and proposed the name to be revised to pituitary NET (PitNET). 119 Pituitary NET originates from the adenohypophysis cells and accounts for about 15% of all intracranial neoplasms. They are divided into clinically functioning and non‐functioning. Functioning tumors are characterized by hormonal hypersecretion and related signs and symptoms such as acromegaly due to elevated plasma growth hormone (GH) and/or insulin growth factor 1, amenorrhea–galactorrhea or hypogonadism due to hyperprolactinemia, or Cushing's disease due to hypercortisolism. Non‐functioning tumors do not cause signs and symptoms of hypersecretion, except for hyperprolactinemia due to hypothalamic disconnection. 120
Generally, the normal pituitary, as well as PitNET tissues, express all five SSTRs; however, it has been demonstrated that the expression of the different SSTR subtypes varies according to the subtype of PitNET. 121 , 122 , 123 Specifically, GH‐ and TSH‐secreting PitNETs express SSTR2 in 90% of cases and SSTR5 to a lesser extent. Conversely, the predominant subtype in ACTH‐secreting PitNETs is SSTR5; however, expression of SSTR2 is also present. Gonadotroph tumors mainly express SSTR3 while in prolactinomas, SSTR1 and SSTR5 are the most representative subtypes. 5 , 121 , 124 Despite the wide evidence of SSTRs expression in PitNETs, PRRT has been rarely used in the management of patients with aggressive or metastatic PitNETs. In fact, to date, only clinical case reports have been published. In 2023, Marques P. reported that of the 27 published cases with available information on response, PRRT resulted in 5 (18%) patients with PR, 8 (30%) demonstrated SD, and 14 patients (52%) had PD. 125 Notably, some responses to PRRT are remarkable and long‐lasting. However, more than 50% of the published cases had PD after PRRT, probably due to the few PRRT cycles (one or two) that are likely insufficient to stabilize the disease or induce an objective response. 126
3.8. Merkel cell carcinoma
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy of the skin, also known as NE carcinoma of the skin, with high rates of recurrence and distant metastasis. 127 It was reported that at least one third of MCCs express high levels of SSTRs, 128 thus allowing for SSA‐based treatments. Experience on the use of PRRT is limited to case reports only. In a recent systematic review, a total of 28 patients from different centers treated with PRRT were collected and analyzed. Radiologic response was available for 19 of 28 patients who received PRRT alone. Six (31.6%) of 19 patients showed objective responses, from partial to complete, and no severe adverse events were reported. The mOS from the start of PRRT was 5 and 8 months in patients receiving PRRT alone or in combination with other active treatments, respectively. mOS from diagnosis was 22 months. 129
3.9. Miscellaneous
As Reubi et al. demonstrated more than 20 years ago, 5 the expression of SSTR is reported by many different cancer types. Thus, PRRT was used in several tumors with confirmation of SSTR expression, including thymic carcinoid, breast cancer, prostate cancer (Figure 4), colon–rectal cancer, and glioblastoma. 39 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 There are ongoing clinical trials in the recruitment phase that include all SSTR‐positive tumors without distinction of origin (NCT061271, NCT06045260).
FIGURE 4.

Multi‐tracer imaging with 68Ga‐PSMA‐11, 18F‐FDG, and 68Ga‐DOTATOC in a patient with prostate cancer. The patient was diagnosed with metastatic primary neuroendocrine prostate cancer in 2020 (PSMA PET‐negative, FDG PET‐positive, SSTR PET‐positive). After progression under taxane, the patient was treated with 3 cycles of 177Lu‐DOTATATE (cumulated activity 22.8 GBq). The patient progressed during PRRT and died 4 months after the end of treatment. PET, positron emission tomography; PRRT, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.
4. ADVANCEMENTS AND PERSPECTIVES
4.1. Combination therapies
Combination treatments have recently gained interest as alternative treatment approaches to enhance PRRT response. Combination treatments have a synergistic effect and potentially upregulate SSTR expression also in non‐GEPNET tumors. 135 , 136 Radiosensitizing low‐dose chemotherapy may enhance its effects by inhibiting DNA repair, arresting cell proliferation, increasing DNA damage, or inducing apoptosis. Notably, radiosensitivity varies throughout the cell cycle; it is highest during mitosis and lowest during the S‐phase. Chemotherapeutic agents can arrest cells in mitosis, thereby acting as potent radiation sensitizers. 137 , 138
The efficacy of concomitant 177Lu‐DOTATATE and capecitabine was evaluated by Yadav et al. in 25 malignant PGLs. Specifically, capecitabine (1250 mg/m2) was prescribed for 15 consecutive days commencing on the date of 177Lu‐DOTATATE therapy. Twenty‐one of the 24 patients showed a decrease in the CgA level; however, only 7 patients showed a significant decrease in the CgA levels >50%. According to RECIST 1.1, PR was observed in 7 patients (28%), SD in 14 patients (56%), reaching a DCR of about 84%. In the group with PR, the Karnofsky Performance Status showed nearly significant improvement from 62.5 ± 17 to 80 ± 8 (p < 0.068), as well as in patients with SD, where a significant improvement in the Karnofsky Performance Status from 66.9 ± 10.4 to 78.5 ± 9.4 (p < 0.002) was shown. The predicted mPFS based on RECIST 1.1 criteria was 32 months, and the mOS in the total population was not reached. Considering toxicity profiles, three patients developed Grade 1 lymphocytopenia with no other hematological, renal, or hepatic adverse events reported, 139 demonstrating no additional toxicity compared to PRRT alone. The safety and efficacy of 177Lu‐DOTATATE in combination with carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab vs. chemotherapy alone are under investigation in a Phase I/II clinical trial (NCT05142696) on newly diagnosed extensive‐stage SCLC (ES‐SCLC).
In addition to chemotherapy, the combination of PRRT with immune checkpoint inhibitors has also been explored. The PD‐1/PD‐L1 expression in NETs is a matter of debate. It was suggested that PD‐L1 expression increases with tumor grade in both tumor cells and immune‐infiltrating cells, indicating a complex interaction between tumor aggressiveness and mechanisms of immune escape. 140 A study conducted by Rösner et al. revealed that PD‐L1 expression in lung NENs is positively correlated with tumor grade, higher Ki‐67 index, and enhanced CXCR4 expression. In contrast, it showed an inverse association with SSTR1 and chromogranin, suggesting that PD‐L1 might be linked to inferior responses to PRRT. 141 In a preliminary Phase I study on nine extensive‐stage small cell lung cancer (ES‐SCLC) patients treated with PRRT plus Nivolumab, following a standard 3 + 3 design, two activity levels were assessed (Dose level 1: Lutathera 3.7 GBq every 8 weeks for four administrations with nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks; activity level 2: Lutathera 7.4 GBq every 8 weeks for four administrations with nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks). The authors showed no limiting toxicities at activity level 1, while at activity level 2, one patient developed Grade 3 rash. 142 Of note, at the time of writing, two trials (i.e., NCT04261855 and NCT05583708) for the evaluation of combined PRRT with immunotherapy (Avelumab and Pembrolizumab, respectively) in patients with MCC are still recruiting.
Inhibiting the DNA repair mechanisms that counteract radiation‐induced damage from PRRT could be an innovative treatment approach. The DNA damage consists of double‐ and/or single‐strand breaks that are repaired by poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase‐1 (PARP1). 143 Hence, inhibitors of PARP1 (PARP1i) have become important tools, especially in BRCA1/2mut patients. Promising preclinical data have been published on the combination of 177Lu‐DOTATOC with PARP1i in SCLC, 144 but clinical translation is still awaited.
Future treatment options may also include combining PRRT with EBRT. In 2020, Hartrampf et al. provided long‐term data on a cohort of 10 patients with unresectable meningioma (6 × WHO Grade I, 2 × WHO Grade II, 2 × WHO grading not available) treated with 1 cycle of PRRT followed by EBRT, originally published by Kreiss et al. in 2012. 93 For the single cycle of PRRT, a mean activity of 7.4 ± 0.3 GBq of 177Lu‐DOTATOC/−TATE (DOTATOC, n = 6; DOTATATE, n = 4) was intravenously injected, resulting in highly heterogeneous tumor doses between 0.2 and 30.7 Gy (median, 7.2 Gy). A median dose of 53.0 Gy (range, 41.8–60.0 Gy) was administered by EBRT. After follow‐up of more than 8 years, no relevant chronic side effects or adverse events >CTC Grade 2 were reported. The combination of PRRT and EBRT resulted in disease stabilization in 7 of the 10 patients. The mPFS was 91.1 months (range, 13.8–111.4) for the entire cohort, with 107.7 months (range, 47.2–111.4) for the patients with controlled disease and 26.2 months (range, 13.8–75.9) for the patients with meningioma progression. The mOS was 105.0 months (range, 38.2–111.4). 94 In this scenario, the combination of various radiopharmaceuticals, such as 131I‐MIBG and 177Lu‐DOTATATE, can be used to target simultaneously different pathways in selected tumors. 145
4.2. New alpha isotopes
Alpha‐labeled SSTR‐based analogs have recently gained interest also in NETs. In general, alpha particles generate a high ionization density, resulting in greater double‐strand DNA damage compared to beta particles, which are largely independent of the oxygen levels. 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150
The application of TAT, which has been tested preclinically in lung NE models 151 , 152 and clinically in patients with NENs of various origins, 153 could offer an alternative approach to enhance PRRT efficacy. In 2022, a pilot study on nine advanced‐stage PGLs treated with 225Ac‐DOTATATE was published: six patients presented with parasympathetic, and three had sympathetic PGL. The mean cumulative activity injected was 42.4 ± 27 (15.54–86.6) MBq, and the median number of cycles administered was 3 (range, 2–9). Among the seven/nine patients evaluated by RECIST 1.1, the best response was PR in four (50%) and SD in three (37.5%) patients. One patient with sympathetic PGL also refractory to the previous 177Lu‐PRRT experienced morphological disease progression. The Karnofsky Performance Status showed remarkable improvement in patients with partial tumor regression (60 ± 7 to 85 ± 5, p = 0.0050). The intake of analgesics significantly decreased (p = 0.0068). No side effects were observed due to concomitant capecitabine treatment. Pre‐existing Grades 1 and 2 anemia was present in four and three patients, respectively, but no worsening was noted during the course of treatment. No Grade 3/4 hematological, kidney, and liver toxicities were reported. 154
TAT has also been tested in clinical trials. The phase I trial (NCT03466216) of a 212Pb‐DOTAMTATE compound called Alphamedix, which was completed in 2021, showed no dose‐limiting toxicity in a group of NEN patients with various primary sites (including lung carcinoid), so a Phase II trial (NCT05153772) of this compound in PRRT‐naive patients is ongoing. Further Phase I/IIa dose escalation studies (NCT05636618; NCT06427798; NCT06479811) of 212Pb‐VMT‐α‐NET have expanded the indication to all advanced SSTR2‐positive NETs. In addition, several Phase I studies are evaluating 225Ac‐DOTATATE in patients with advanced, SSTR+, well‐differentiated GEP‐NETs who are PRRT‐naïve (NCT06732505) or in progression after 177Lu‐based treatment (NCT06732505; NCT05477576). In the past, combinations of 90Y‐ and 177Lu‐labeled analogs have been studied, but recent advances may shift toward the integration of alpha‐emitting isotopes due to their higher energy transfer and reduced penetration range, which may improve treatment outcomes.
In this context, it is also important to mention the limitations associated with TAT. Firstly, problems of availability and production, half‐life, cost, and the ability to incorporate them chemically and stably into a suitable vector have limited the number of alpha‐radionuclides available for potential clinical use. 155 In addition, the lack of dosimetry studies, both in vitro and in vivo, in most cases has led to uncertainty in the calculation of the tumor absorbed dose, a key element for further therapy implementation. 156 Impressive preclinical responses suggest that TAT has a high potential for anti‐tumor efficacy in SSTR2‐overexpressing cancers. However, it is well known that NEN patients often have heterogeneous positive receptor expression. Given the short range of the alpha‐particle, cells with lower receptor expression than neighboring high‐expressing cells are less likely to be irradiated due to the limited crossfire effect. 157
4.3. New pathways
New treatment strategies are emerging for the treatment of NENs based on different targeted receptors. The LUMED trial evaluated the CCK2R antagonist 177Lu‐PP‐F11N. In the phase0 study on advanced MTC, the authors first demonstrated that 177Lu‐PP‐F11N median absorbed doses for tumors, stomach, kidneys, and bone marrow were 0.88 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.85–1.04), 0.42 (IQR, 0.25–1.01), 0.11 (IQR, 0.07–0.13), and 0.028 (IQR, 0.026–0.034) Gy/GBq, respectively. The median tumor‐to‐stomach dose ratio was 3.34 (IQR, 1.14–4.70), confirming the stomach as the dose‐limiting organ. Adverse reactions (mainly hypotension, flushing, and hypokalemia) were self‐limiting and not higher than Grade 1. 158 In the context of meningiomas, the PROMENADE Phase 0 study proved the therapeutic efficacy of 177Lu‐DOTA‐JR11 in seven progressive treatment‐refractory meningioma patients. Among the total cohort, six patients received one cycle of 177Lu‐DOTATOC at an activity of 6.9–7.3 GBq followed by one cycle of 177Lu‐DOTA‐JR11 at an activity of 3.3–4.9 GBq. Afterwards, additional 177Lu‐DOTA‐JR11 treatment cycles were performed according to clinical needs. The authors observed a median tumor‐to‐bone marrow absorbed dose ratio of 1.4 (range, 0.9–1.9) times higher with 177Lu‐DOTA‐JR11. Only 1 of 6 patients showed a slightly lower tumor‐to‐bone marrow absorbed dose ratio with 177Lu‐DOTAJR11 than with 177Lu‐DOTATOC. In correlation with the dosimetry results, quantitative posttreatment SPECT scans showed more pronounced accumulation in meningioma lesions and in the bone marrow with 177Lu‐DOTA‐JR11 than with 177Lu‐DOTATOC. Because of the favorable dosimetry results for the SST2 antagonist, one to two additional treatment cycles were performed with 177Lu‐DOTA‐JR11, resulting in a DCR of 83% (95% CI, 53%–100%) at least 12 months after inclusion. In all patients, the reported adverse events resolved after a few weeks and there were no Grade 4 or 5 adverse events. Up to 13 months after the first therapy cycle with 177Lu‐DOTA‐JR11, there was no worsening of kidney function and no evidence for myelodysplastic syndrome or other neoplasms. 159 In this scenario, also the NeoRay study (NCT03872778, http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03872778), a Phase I/IIa Open‐label, Multi‐center Study is ongoing to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and dosimetry of 177Lu‐NeoB in patients with advanced solid tumors known to overexpress GRPR, including NENs.
In addition to the new treatment options mentioned above, the use of different routes of administration (locoregional vs. systemic) or their combination (e.g., PRRT plus locoregional treatment for liver metastases NCT04544098), as well as the possibility of using PRRT as an alternative strategy for downstaging tumors (e.g., neoadjuvant treatment before surgery, NCT04609592) is currently being investigated in clinical trials and may be promising approaches to improve the outcome of PRRT also in tumors beyond GEPNET.
5. CONCLUSIONS
The present review was designed to collect data on the use of PRRT with SSAs in tumors beyond GEPNET. Although limited by the heterogeneity and paucity of the available data, the present paper shows that many SSTR‐expressing tumors have been treated with PRRT.
In certain types of tumors, such as lung carcinoids, PGLs, and meningiomas, high rates of disease control (up to 80%) have been achieved. Given the limited therapeutic alternatives available for advanced or metastatic stages of these diseases, there is a clear need for results from randomized trials to formally approve PRRT with SSAs for patients who could benefit from this treatment. For other less extensively studied SSTR‐expressing tumors, data are insufficient to draw clear conclusions. In this context, PRRT treatment regimens could be significantly optimized through dosimetry, as empirical fixed‐activity administrations may lead to significant undertreatment.
In the currently evolving scenario, the combination of PRRT with other treatments (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy), the transition to alpha emitters, as well as the use of alternative approaches (e.g., non‐SSTR‐based radionuclide treatment, different routes of administration) may also find a way in NENs beyond GEPNET. Results of ongoing clinical trials are awaited to confirm the efficacy of these innovative approaches and hopefully pave the way to new avenues for thera(g)nostic.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Giulia Santo: Conceptualization; data curation; writing – original draft. Gianpaolo di Santo: Visualization; writing – review and editing. Francesco Cicone: Visualization; writing – review and editing. Irene Virgolini: Writing – review and editing; supervision; conceptualization.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
PEER REVIEW
The peer review history for this article is available at https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1111/jne.70013.
PATIENT CONSENT
Informed consent for the publication of images was received from all patients who appear in the manuscript.
Santo G, di Santo G, Cicone F, Virgolini I. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with somatostatin analogs beyond gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Neuroendocrinol. 2025;37(3):e70013. doi: 10.1111/jne.70013
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
REFERENCES
- 1. Bodei L, Mueller‐Brand J, Baum RP, et al. The joint IAEA, EANM, and SNMMI practical guidance on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRNT) in neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(5):800‐816. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2330-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Brazeau P, Vale W, Burgus R, et al. Hypothalamic polypeptide that inhibits the secretion of immunoreactive pituitary growth hormone. Science. 1973;179(4068):77‐79. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4068.77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Van Op den Bosch J, Adriaensen D, Van Nassauw L, Timmermans JP. The role(s) of somatostatin, structurally related peptides and somatostatin receptors in the gastrointestinal tract: a review. Regul Pept. 2009;156(1–3):1‐8. doi: 10.1016/j.regpep.2009.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Theodoropoulou M, Stalla GK. Somatostatin receptors: from signaling to clinical practice. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2013;34(3):228‐252. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2013.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Reubi JC, Waser B, Schaer JC, Laissue JA. Somatostatin receptor sst1‐sst5 expression in normal and neoplastic human tissues using receptor autoradiography with subtype‐selective ligands. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28(7):836‐846. doi: 10.1007/s002590100541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Strosberg J, El‐Haddad G, Wolin E, et al. Phase 3 trial of 177Lu‐dotatate for midgut neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(2):125‐135. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Virgolini I, Britton K, Buscombe J, Moncayo R, Paganelli G, Riva P. In‐ and Y‐DOTA‐lanreotide: results and implications of the MAURITIUS trial. Semin Nucl Med. 2002;32(2):148‐155. doi: 10.1053/snuc.2002.31565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Evangelou G, Vamvakaris I, Papafili A, Anagnostakis M, Peppa M. Lung NETs and GEPNETs: one cancer with different origins or two distinct cancers? Cancers Basel. 2024;16(6):1177. doi: 10.3390/cancers16061177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bodei L, Schöder H, Baum RP, et al. Molecular profiling of neuroendocrine tumours to predict response and toxicity to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(9):e431‐e443. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30323-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Bischoff P, Trinks A, Wiederspahn J, et al. The single‐cell transcriptional landscape of lung carcinoid tumors. Int J Cancer. 2022;150(12):2058‐2071. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Chmiel P, Rychcik‐Pazyrska P, Stec R. Defining tumor microenvironment as a possible target for effective GEP‐NENs immunotherapy—a systematic review. Cancers Basel. 2023;15(21):5232. doi: 10.3390/cancers15215232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Shi C, Morse MA. Mechanisms of resistance in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cancers Basel. 2022;14(24):6114. doi: 10.3390/cancers14246114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Parliament MB, Murray D. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of DNA repair genes as predictors of radioresponse. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2010;20(4):232‐240. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2010.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Deppen SA, Blume J, Bobbey AJ, et al. 68Ga‐DOTATATE compared with 111In‐DTPA‐octreotide and conventional imaging for pulmonary and Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(6):872‐878. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.165803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Pauwels E, Cleeren F, Bormans G, Deroose CM. Somatostatin receptor PET ligands—the next generation for clinical practice. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;8(5):311‐331. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bozkurt MF, Virgolini I, Balogova S, et al. Guideline for PET/CT imaging of neuroendocrine neoplasms with 68Ga‐DOTA‐conjugated somatostatin receptor targeting peptides and 18F‐DOPA. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(9):1588‐1601. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3728-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Pfeifer A, Knigge U, Mortensen J, et al. Clinical PET of neuroendocrine tumors using 64CuDOTATATE: first‐in‐humans study. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1207‐1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Santo G, Di Santo G, Virgolini I. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors: agonist, antagonist and alternatives. Semin Nucl Med. 2024;54(4):557‐569. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2024.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Wild D, Fani M, Fischer R, et al. Comparison of somatostatin receptor agonist and antagonist for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: a pilot study. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1248‐1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wild D, Antwi K, Fani M, Christ ER. Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor as emerging target: will it make it to the clinic? J Nucl Med. 2021;62(suppl. 2):44S‐50S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.246009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Lapa C, Lückerath K, Rudelius M, et al. [68Ga]Pentixafor‐PET/CT for imaging of chemokine receptor 4 expression in small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(8):9288‐9295. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. von Guggenberg E, Uprimny C, Klinger M, et al. Preliminary clinical experience with cholecystokinin‐2 receptor PET/CT using the 68Ga‐labeled minigastrin analog DOTA‐MGS5 in patients with medullary thyroid cancer. J Nucl Med. 2023;64(6):859‐862. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264977 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Di Santo G, Santo G, Martinovic V, et al. Cholecystokinin‐2 receptor targeting by [68Ga]Ga‐DOTA‐MGS5 PET/CT in a patient with extensive disease small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024;51(9):2848‐2849. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06749-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Moreno P, Ramos‐Álvarez I, Moody TW, Jensen RT. Bombesin related peptides/receptors and their promising therapeutic roles in cancer imaging, targeting and treatment. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2016;20(9):1055‐1073. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2016.1164694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Ito T, Jensen RT. Molecular imaging in neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances, controversies, unresolved issues, and roles in management. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2017;24(1):15‐24. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Krenning EP, Kooij PP, Bakker WH, et al. Radiotherapy with a radiolabeled somatostatin analogue, [111In‐DTPA‐D‐Phe1]‐octreotide. A case history. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994;733:496‐506. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb17300.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Targeted Alpha Therapy Working Group , Parker C, Lewington V, et al. Targeted alpha therapy, an emerging class of cancer agents: a review. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(12):1765‐1772. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Mariniello A, Bodei L, Tinelli C, et al. Long‐term results of PRRT in advanced bronchopulmonary carcinoid. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(3):441‐452. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3190-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ianniello A, Sansovini M, Severi S, et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with (177)Lu‐DOTATATE in advanced bronchial carcinoids: prognostic role of thyroid transcription factor 1 and (18)F‐FDG PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(6):1040‐1046. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3262-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Sabet A, Haug AR, Eiden C, et al. Efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu‐octreotate in metastatic pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors: a dual‐centre analysis. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;7(2):74‐83. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Mirvis E, Toumpanakis C, Mandair D, Gnanasegaran G, Caplin M, Navalkissoor S. Efficacy and tolerability of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in advanced metastatic bronchial neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Lung Cancer. 2020;150:70‐75. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Minutoli F, Cardile D, Laudicella R, Vento A, Pagano B, Baldari S. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms: a single‐Centre experience. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;55(1):38‐45. doi: 10.1007/s13139-020-00679-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Parghane RV, Talole S, Prabhash K, Basu S. Clinical response profile of metastatic/advanced pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu‐DOTATATE. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(6):428‐435. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Lim LE, Chan DL, Thomas D, et al. Australian experience of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in lung neuroendocrine tumours. Oncotarget. 2020;11(27):2636‐2646. Published 2020 Jul 7. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Zidan L, Iravani A, Oleinikov K, et al. Efficacy and safety of 177Lu‐DOTATATE in lung neuroendocrine tumors: a bicenter study. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(2):218‐225. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.260760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Thoracic Tumours . WHO Classification of Tumours. Vol 5. 5th ed. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board; 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Vocino Trucco G, Righi L, Volante M, Papotti M. Updates on lung neuroendocrine neoplasm classification. Histopathology. 2024;84(1):67‐85. doi: 10.1111/his.15058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Kanakis G, Grimelius L, Spathis A, et al. Expression of somatostatin receptors 1–5 and dopamine receptor 2 in lung carcinoids: implications for a therapeutic role. Neuroendocrinology. 2015;101(3):211‐222. doi: 10.1159/000381061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Baudin E, Caplin M, Garcia‐Carbonero R, et al. Lung and thymic carcinoids: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(11):1453‐1455. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.2150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Yao JC, Fazio N, Singh S, et al. Everolimus for the treatment of advanced, non‐functional neuroendocrine tumours of the lung or gastrointestinal tract (RADIANT‐4): a randomised, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2016;387(10022):968‐977. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00817-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kwekkeboom DJ, de Herder WW, Kam BL, et al. Treatment with the radiolabeled somatostatin analog [177 Lu‐DOTA 0,Tyr3]octreotate: toxicity, efficacy, and survival. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(13):2124‐2130. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Jayaprakasam VS, Bodei L. Neuroendocrine tumor therapy response assessment. PET Clin. 2023;18(2):267‐286. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2022.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Forrer F, Riedweg I, Maecke HR, Mueller‐Brand J. Radiolabeled DOTATOC in patients with advanced paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;52(4):334‐340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Nastos K, Cheung VTF, Toumpanakis C, et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide treatment and (131)I‐MIBG in the management of patients with metastatic/progressive phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115(4):425‐434. doi: 10.1002/jso.24553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Kong G, Grozinsky‐Glasberg S, Hofman MS, et al. Efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for functional metastatic paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(9):3278‐3287. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-00816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Zandee WT, Feelders RA, Smit Duijzentkunst DA, et al. Treatment of inoperable or metastatic paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using 177Lu‐DOTATATE. Eur J Endocrinol. 2019;181(1):45‐53. doi: 10.1530/EJE-18-0901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Vyakaranam AR, Crona J, Norlén O, et al. Favorable outcome in patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma treated with 177Lu‐DOTATATE. Cancers Basel. 2019;11(7):909. doi: 10.3390/cancers11070909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Kolasinska‐Ćwikła A, Pęczkowska M, Ćwikła JB, et al. A clinical efficacy of PRRT in patients with advanced, nonresectable, paraganglioma–pheochromocytoma, related to SDHx gene mutation. J Clin Med. 2019;8(7):952. doi: 10.3390/jcm8070952 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Jaiswal SK, Sarathi V, Memon SS, et al. 177Lu‐DOTATATE therapy in metastatic/inoperable pheochromocytoma–paraganglioma. Endocr Connect. 2020;9(9):864‐873. doi: 10.1530/EC-20-0292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Severi S, Bongiovanni A, Ferrara M, et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with metastatic progressive pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: long‐term toxicity, efficacy and prognostic biomarker data of phase II clinical trials. ESMO Open. 2021;6(4):100171. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Nilica B, Svirydenka H, Mair C, Stephan Kroiss A, Gabriel M, Virgolini I. Personalized thera(g)nostic approach in patients with paraganglioma: peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Clin Oncol. 2021;6:1824. [Google Scholar]
- 52. Prado‐Wohlwend S, Del Olmo‐García MI, Bello‐Arques P, Merino‐Torres JF. [177Lu]Lu‐DOTA‐TATE and [131I]MIBG phenotypic imaging‐based therapy in metastatic/inoperable pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: comparative results in a single center. Front Endocrinol Lausanne. 2022;13:778322. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.778322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Rubino M, Di Stasio GD, Bodei L, et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu‐ or 90Y‐SSTR peptides in malignant pheochromocytomas (PCCs) and paragangliomas (PGLs): results from a single institutional retrospective analysis. Endocrine. 2024;84(2):704‐710. doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-03707-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Mete O, Asa SL, Gill AJ, Kimura N, de Krijger RR, Tischler A. Overview of the 2022 WHO classification of paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas. Endocr Pathol. 2022;33(1):90‐114. doi: 10.1007/s12022-022-09704-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Flynn A, Benn D, Clifton‐Bligh R, et al. The genomic landscape of phaeochromocytoma. J Pathol. 2015;236(1):78‐89. doi: 10.1002/path.4503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Neumann HP, Pawlu C, Peczkowska M, et al. Distinct clinical features of paraganglioma syndromes associated with SDHB and SDHD gene mutations. JAMA. 2004;292(8):943‐951. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.8.943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Pasini B, McWhinney SR, Bei T, et al. Clinical and molecular genetics of patients with the Carney–Stratakis syndrome and germline mutations of the genes coding for the succinate dehydrogenase subunits SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008;16(1):79‐88. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Fassnacht M, Assie G, Baudin E, et al. Adrenocortical carcinomas and malignant phaeochromocytomas: ESMO‐EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(11):1476‐1490. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Gonias S, Goldsby R, Matthay KK, et al. Phase II study of high‐dose [131I]metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy for patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4162‐4168. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.3496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Pryma DA, Chin BB, Noto RB, et al. Efficacy and safety of high‐specific‐activity 131I‐MIBG therapy in patients with advanced pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(5):623‐630. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.217463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Reubi JC, Waser B, Khosla S, et al. In vitro and in vivo detection of somatostatin receptors in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;74(5):1082‐1089. doi: 10.1210/jcem.74.5.1349024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Elston MS, Meyer‐Rochow GY, Conaglen HM, et al. Increased SSTR2A and SSTR3 expression in succinate dehydrogenase‐deficient pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Hum Pathol. 2015;46(3):390‐396. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.11.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Benn DE, Robinson BG, Clifton‐Bligh RJ. 15 Years of paraganglioma: clinical manifestations of paraganglioma syndromes types 1–5. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22(4):T91‐T103. doi: 10.1530/ERC-15-0268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Bodei L, Handkiewicz‐Junak D, Grana C, et al. Receptor radionuclide therapy with 90Y‐DOTATOC in patients with medullary thyroid carcinomas. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2004;19(1):65‐71. doi: 10.1089/108497804773391694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Iten F, Müller B, Schindler C, et al. Response to [90Yttrium‐DOTA]‐TOC treatment is associated with long‐term survival benefit in metastasized medullary thyroid cancer: a phase II clinical trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(22 Pt 1):6696‐6702. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Beukhof CM, Brabander T, van Nederveen FH, et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma: predictors and pitfalls. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5540-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Parghane RV, Naik C, Talole S, et al. Clinical utility of 177Lu‐DOTATATE PRRT in somatostatin receptor‐positive metastatic medullary carcinoma of thyroid patients with assessment of efficacy, survival analysis, prognostic variables, and toxicity. Head Neck. 2020;42(3):401‐416. doi: 10.1002/hed.26024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Liu Q, Kulkarni HR, Zhao T, et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with advanced progressive medullary thyroid cancer: efficacy, safety, and survival predictors. Clin Nucl Med. 2023;48(3):221‐227. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Wells SA Jr, Asa SL, Dralle H, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2015;25(6):567‐610. doi: 10.1089/thy.2014.0335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Filetti S, Durante C, Hartl D, et al. Thyroid cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(12):1856‐1883. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Wells SA Jr, Robinson BG, Gagel RF, et al. Vandetanib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer: a randomized, double‐blind phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(2):134‐141. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.5040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Zatelli MC, Piccin D, Tagliati F, et al. Selective activation of somatostatin receptor subtypes differentially modulates secretion and viability in human medullary thyroid carcinoma primary cultures: potential clinical perspectives. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(6):2218‐2224. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Kwekkeboom DJ, Reubi JC, Lamberts SW, et al. In vivo somatostatin receptor imaging in medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;76(6):1413‐1417. doi: 10.1210/jcem.76.6.8501144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Caplin ME, Mielcarek W, Buscombe JR, et al. Toxicity of high‐activity 111In‐octreotide therapy in patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumours. Nucl Med Commun. 2000;21(1):97‐102. doi: 10.1097/00006231-200001000-00016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Buscombe JR, Caplin ME, Hilson AJ. Long‐term efficacy of high‐activity 111in‐pentetreotide therapy in patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(1):1‐6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Lee DY, Kim YI. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: a meta‐analysis. Clin Nucl Med. 2020;45(8):604‐610. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000003110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Bartolomei M, Bodei L, De Cicco C, et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with (90)Y‐DOTATOC in recurrent meningioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36(9):1407‐1416. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1115-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Gerster‐Gilliéron K, Forrer F, Maecke H, Mueller‐Brand J, Merlo A, Cordier D. 90Y‐DOTATOC as a therapeutic option for complex recurrent or progressive meningiomas. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(11):1748‐1751. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.155853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Marincek N, Radojewski P, Dumont RA, et al. Somatostatin receptor‐targeted radiopeptide therapy with 90Y‐DOTATOC and 177Lu‐DOTATOC in progressive meningioma: long‐term results of a phase II clinical trial. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(2):171‐176. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.147256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Seystahl K, Stoecklein V, Schüller U, et al. Somatostatin receptor‐targeted radionuclide therapy for progressive meningioma: benefit linked to 68Ga‐DOTATATE/‐TOC uptake. Neuro Oncol. 2016;18(11):1538‐1547. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Minczeles NS, Bos EM, de Leeuw RC, et al. Efficacy and safety of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [177Lu]Lu‐DOTA‐TATE in 15 patients with progressive treatment‐refractory meningioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50(4):1195‐1204. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-06044-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Kurz SC, Zan E, Cordova C, et al. Evaluation of the SSTR2‐targeted radiopharmaceutical 177Lu‐DOTATATE and SSTR2‐specific 68Ga‐DOTATATE PET as imaging biomarker in patients with intracranial meningioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2024;30(4):680‐686. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-2533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Gittleman HR, Ostrom QT, Rouse CD, et al. Trends in central nervous system tumor incidence relative to other common cancers in adults, adolescents, and children in the United States, 2000 to 2010. Cancer. 2015;121(1):102‐112. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Maggio I, Franceschi E, Tosoni A, et al. Meningioma: not always a benign tumor. A review of advances in the treatment of meningiomas. CNS Oncol. 2021;10(2):CNS72. doi: 10.2217/cns-2021-0003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Torp SH, Solheim O, Skjulsvik AJ. The WHO 2021 classification of central nervous system tumours: a practical update on what neurosurgeons need to know‐a minireview. Acta Neurochir. 2022;164(9):2453‐2464. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05301-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Goldbrunner R, Stavrinou P, Jenkinson MD, et al. EANO guideline on the diagnosis and management of meningiomas. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(11):1821‐1834. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Apra C, Peyre M, Kalamarides M. Current treatment options for meningioma. Expert Rev Neurother. 2018;18(3):241‐249. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2018.1429920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Albert NL, Preusser M, Traub‐Weidinger T, et al. Joint EANM/EANO/RANO/SNMMI practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024;51(12):3662‐3679. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06783-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Arena S, Barbieri F, Thellung S, et al. Expression of somatostatin receptor mRNA in human meningiomas and their implication in in vitro antiproliferative activity. J Neurooncol. 2004;66(1–2):155‐166. doi: 10.1023/b:neon.0000013498.19981.55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Dutour A, Kumar U, Panetta R, et al. Expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes in human brain tumors. Int J Cancer. 1998;76(5):620‐627. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980529)76:5<620::aid-ijc2>3.0.co;2-s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Minutoli F, Amato E, Sindoni A, et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with inoperable meningiomas: our experience and review of the literature. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2014;29(5):193‐199. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2013.1599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Mirian C, Duun‐Henriksen AK, Maier A, et al. Somatostatin receptor‐targeted radiopeptide therapy in treatment‐refractory meningioma: individual patient data meta‐analysis. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(4):507‐513. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.249607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Kreissl MC, Hänscheid H, Löhr M, et al. Combination of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with fractionated external beam radiotherapy for treatment of advanced symptomatic meningioma. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:99. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-99 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Hartrampf PE, Hänscheid H, Kertels O, et al. Long‐term results of multimodal peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and fractionated external beam radiotherapy for treatment of advanced symptomatic meningioma. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2020;22:29‐32. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.03.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Boursier C, Zaragori T, Bros M, et al. Semi‐automated segmentation methods of SSTR PET for dosimetry prediction in refractory meningioma patients treated by SSTR‐targeted peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Eur Radiol. 2023;33(10):7089‐7098. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09697-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Cicone F, Gnesin S, Santo G, et al. Do we need dosimetry for the optimization of theranostics in CNS tumors? Neuro Oncol. 2024;26(suppl):S242‐S258. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Mair MJ, Tabouret E, Johnson DR, et al. Radioligand therapies in meningioma: evidence and future directions. Neuro Oncol. 2024;26(suppl):S215‐S228. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Huang RY, Bi WL, Weller M, et al. Proposed response assessment and endpoints for meningioma clinical trials: report from the Response Assessment in Neuro‐Oncology Working Group. Neuro Oncol. 2019;21(1):26‐36. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Schlumberger M, Tahara M, Wirth LJ, et al. Lenvatinib versus placebo in radioiodine‐refractory thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(7):621‐630. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Brose MS, Nutting CM, Jarzab B, et al. Sorafenib in radioactive iodine‐refractory, locally advanced or metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer: a randomised, double‐blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9940):319‐328. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60421-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Reubi JC, Laissue J, Krenning E, Lamberts SW. Somatostatin receptors in human cancer: incidence, characteristics, functional correlates and clinical implications. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1992;43(1–3):27‐35. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(92)90184-k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Ain KB, Taylor KD, Tofiq S, Venkataraman G. Somatostatin receptor subtype expression in human thyroid and thyroid carcinoma cell lines. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(6):1857‐1862. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.6.4013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Klagge A, Krause K, Schierle K, Steinert F, Dralle H, Fuhrer D. Somatostatin receptor subtype expression in human thyroid tumours. Horm Metab Res. 2010;42(4):237‐240. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Gabriel M, Froehlich F, Decristoforo C, et al. 99mTc‐EDDA/HYNIC‐TOC and 18F‐FDG in thyroid cancer patients with negative 131I whole‐body scans. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31(3):330‐341. doi: 10.1007/s00259-003-1376-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Roll W, Riemann B, Schäfers M, Stegger L, Vrachimis A. 177Lu‐DOTATATE therapy in radioiodine‐refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: a single center experience. Clin Nucl Med. 2018;43(10):346‐351. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Czepczyński R, Matysiak‐Grześ M, Gryczyńska M, et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer: efficacy and toxicity. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2015;63(2):147‐154. doi: 10.1007/s00005-014-0318-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Versari A, Sollini M, Frasoldati A, et al. Differentiated thyroid cancer: a new perspective with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues for imaging and treatment of patients. Thyroid. 2014;24(4):715‐726. doi: 10.1089/thy.2013.0225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Iten F, Muller B, Schindler C, et al. [90Yttrium‐DOTA]‐TOC response is associated with survival benefit in iodine‐refractory thyroid cancer: long‐term results of a phase 2 clinical trial. Cancer. 2009;115(10):2052‐2062. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Johnsen JI, Dyberg C, Wickström M. Neuroblastoma‐a neural crest derived embryonal malignancy. Front Mol Neurosci. 2019;12:9. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Cheung NK, Dyer MA. Neuroblastoma: developmental biology, cancer genomics and immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(6):397‐411. doi: 10.1038/nrc3526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Alexander N, Vali R, Ahmadzadehfar H, Shammas A, Baruchel S. Review: the role of radiolabeled DOTA‐conjugated peptides for imaging and treatment of childhood Neuroblastoma. Curr Radiopharm. 2018;11(1):14‐21. doi: 10.2174/1874471011666171215093112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Gains JE, Sebire NJ, Moroz V, Wheatley K, Gaze MN. Immunohistochemical evaluation of molecular radiotherapy target expression in neuroblastoma tissue. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(3):402‐411. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3856-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Georgantzi K, Tsolakis AV, Stridsberg M, Jakobson A, Christofferson R, Janson ET. Differentiated expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes in experimental models and clinical neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56(4):584‐589. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Alexander N, Marrano P, Thorner P, et al. Prevalence and clinical correlations of somatostatin receptor‐2 (SSTR2) expression in Neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2019;41(3):222‐227. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Gains JE, Bomanji JB, Fersht NL, et al. 177Lu‐DOTATATE molecular radiotherapy for childhood neuroblastoma. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(7):1041‐1047. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.085100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Kong G, Hofman MS, Murray WK, et al. Initial experience with gallium‐68 DOTA‐octreotate PET/CT and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for pediatric patients with refractory metastatic neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2016;38(2):87‐96. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Gains JE, Moroz V, Aldridge MD, et al. A phase IIa trial of molecular radiotherapy with 177‐lutetium DOTATATE in children with primary refractory or relapsed high‐risk neuroblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(10):2348‐2357. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04741-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Pizzoferro M, Cassano B, Altini C, et al. Imaging post‐177Lu‐peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in a child with advanced progressive somatostatin‐receptor‐positive medulloblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(3):937‐939. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04966-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Tsukamoto T, Miki Y. Imaging of pituitary tumors: an update with the 5th WHO classifications‐part 1. Pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET)/pituitary adenoma. Jpn J Radiol. 2023;41(8):789‐806. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01400-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Trouillas J, Jaffrain‐Rea ML, Vasiljevic A, Raverot G, Roncaroli F, Villa C. How to classify the pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET)s in 2020. Cancers Basel. 2020;12(2):514. doi: 10.3390/cancers12020514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Cuevas‐Ramos D, Fleseriu M. Somatostatin receptor ligands and resistance to treatment in pituitary adenomas. J Mol Endocrinol. 2014;52(3):R223‐R240. doi: 10.1530/JME-14-0011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Behling F, Honegger J, Skardelly M, et al. High expression of somatostatin receptors 2A, 3, and 5 in corticotroph pituitary adenoma. Int J Endocrinol. 2018;2018:1763735. doi: 10.1155/2018/1763735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Chinezu L, Vasiljevic A, Jouanneau E, et al. Expression of somatostatin receptors, SSTR2A and SSTR5, in 108 endocrine pituitary tumors using immunohistochemical detection with new specific monoclonal antibodies. Hum Pathol. 2014;45(1):71‐77. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Hofland LJ, Lamberts SW. The pathophysiological consequences of somatostatin receptor internalization and resistance. Endocr Rev. 2003;24(1):28‐47. doi: 10.1210/er.2000-0001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Marques P. The effects of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy on the neoplastic and normal pituitary. Cancers Basel. 2023;15(10):2710. doi: 10.3390/cancers15102710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Burman P, Casar‐Borota O, Perez‐Rivas LG, Dekkers OM. Aggressive pituitary tumors and pituitary carcinomas: from pathology to treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023;108(10):1585‐1601. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Lugowska I, Becker JC, Ascierto PA, et al. Merkel‐cell carcinoma: ESMO‐EURACAN clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. ESMO Open. 2024;9(5):102977. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Akaike T, Qazi J, Anderson A, et al. High somatostatin receptor expression and efficacy of somatostatin analogues in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(2):319‐327. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Askari E, Moghadam SZ, Wild D, et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in Merkel cell carcinoma: a comprehensive review. J Nucl Med Technol. 2023;51(1):22‐25. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.122.264904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Savelli G, Zaniboni A, Bertagna F, et al. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in a patient affected by metastatic breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation. Breast Care. 2012;7(5):408‐410. doi: 10.1159/000343612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Yasukawa R, Kawamoto B, Muraoka K, Nakamura K, Honda M, Takenaka A. Excellent response to 177Lu‐DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in a patient with treatment‐related neuroendocrine prostate cancer with urinary retention and rectal obstruction: a case report. Yonago Acta Med. 2024;67(3):266‐269. doi: 10.33160/yam.2024.08.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Zhang J, Kulkarni HR, Singh A, Baum RP. Twelve‐year survival of a patient with lymph node, pulmonary, bone, cardiac and Intraspinal metastases of a rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy‐the value of salvage peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Clin Nucl Med. 2020;45(4):198‐200. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Weller M, Albert NL, Galldiks N, et al. Targeted radionuclide therapy for gliomas: emerging clinical trial landscape. Neuro Oncol. 2024;26(suppl):S208‐S214. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Heute D, Kostron H, von Guggenberg E, et al. Response of recurrent high‐grade glioma to treatment with (90)Y‐DOTATOC. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(3):397‐400. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.072819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. di Santo G, Santo G, Sviridenko A, Virgolini I. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy combinations for neuroendocrine tumours in ongoing clinical trials: status 2023. Theranostics. 2024;14(3):940‐953. doi: 10.7150/thno.91268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Oddstig J, Bernhardt P, Nilsson O, Ahlman H, Forssell‐Aronsson E. Radiation induces up‐regulation of somatostatin receptors 1, 2, and 5 in small cell lung cancer in vitro also at low absorbed doses. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2011;26(6):759‐765. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2010.0921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Pawlik TM, Keyomarsi K. Role of cell cycle in mediating sensitivity to radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59(4):928‐942. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Gong L, Zhang Y, Liu C, Zhang M, Han S. Application of Radiosensitizers in cancer radiotherapy. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:1083‐1102. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S290438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Yadav MP, Ballal S, Bal C. Concomitant 177Lu‐DOTATATE and capecitabine therapy in malignant paragangliomas. EJNMMI Res. 2019;9(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13550-019-0484-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Cavalcanti E, Armentano R, Valentini AM, Chieppa M, Caruso ML. Role of PD‐L1 expression as a biomarker for GEP neuroendocrine neoplasm grading. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(8):e3004. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Rösner E, Kaemmerer D, Neubauer E, Sänger J, Lupp A. Prognostic value of PD‐L1 expression in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumours. Endocr Connect. 2021;10(2):180‐190. doi: 10.1530/EC-20-0540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Kim C, Liu SV, Subramaniam DS, et al. Phase I study of the 177Lu‐DOTA0‐Tyr3‐Octreotate (lutathera) in combination with nivolumab in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the lung. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(2):e000980. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Ray Chaudhuri A, Nussenzweig A. The multifaceted roles of PARP1 in DNA repair and chromatin remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(10):610‐621. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.53 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Rauch H, Kitzberger C, Janghu K, et al. Combining [177Lu]Lu‐DOTA‐TOC PRRT with PARP inhibitors to enhance treatment efficacy in small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024;51:4099‐4110. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06844-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Bushnell DL, Bodeker KL, O'Dorisio TM, et al. Addition of 131I‐MIBG to PRRT (90Y‐DOTATOC) for personalized treatment of selected patients with neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(9):1274‐1277. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.254987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Goodhead DT, Thacker J, Cox R. Weiss lecture. Effects of radiations of different qualities on cells: molecular mechanisms of damage and repair. Int J Radiat Biol. 1993;63(5):543‐556. doi: 10.1080/09553009314450721 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Goodhead DT. Mechanisms for the biological effectiveness of high‐LET radiations. J Radiat Res. 1999;40:1‐13. doi: 10.1269/jrr.40.s1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Kassis AI. Therapeutic radionuclides: biophysical and radiobiologic principles. Semin Nucl Med. 2008;38(5):358‐366. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2008.05.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Narayanan PK, Goodwin EH, Lehnert BE. Alpha particles initiate biological production of superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide in human cells. Cancer Res. 1997;57(18):3963‐3971. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Navalkissoor S, Grossman A. Targeted alpha particle therapy for neuroendocrine tumours: the next generation of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Neuroendocrinology. 2019;108(3):256‐264. doi: 10.1159/000494760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Han G, Hwang E, Lin F, et al. RYZ101 (Ac‐225 DOTATATE) opportunity beyond gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: preclinical efficacy in small‐cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2023;22(12):1434‐1443. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-23-0029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Tafreshi NK, Pandya DN, Tichacek CJ, et al. Preclinical evaluation of [225Ac]Ac‐DOTA‐TATE for treatment of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(11):3408‐3421. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05315-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Demirci E, Alan Selçuk N, Beydağı G, et al. Initial findings on the use of [225Ac]Ac‐DOTATATE therapy as a theranostic application in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2023;32(3):226‐232. doi: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2023.38258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Yadav MP, Ballal S, Sahoo RK, Bal C. Efficacy and safety of 225Ac‐DOTATATE targeted alpha therapy in metastatic paragangliomas: a pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(5):1595‐1606. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05632-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Kunikowska J, Królicki L. Targeted α‐emitter therapy of neuroendocrine tumors. Semin Nucl Med. 2020;50(2):171‐176. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2019.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Gape PMD, Schultz MK, Stasiuk GJ, Terry SYA. Towards effective targeted alpha therapy for neuroendocrine tumours: a review. Pharmaceuticals Basel. 2024;17(3):334. doi: 10.3390/ph17030334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Reubi JC, Maecke HR. Approaches to multireceptor targeting: hybrid radioligands, radioligand cocktails, and sequential radioligand applications. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(suppl. 2):10‐16. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Rottenburger C, Nicolas GP, McDougall L, et al. Cholecystokinin 2 receptor agonist 177Lu‐PP‐F11N for radionuclide therapy of medullary thyroid carcinoma: results of the Lumed phase 0a study. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(4):520‐526. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.233031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Eigler C, McDougall L, Bauman A, et al. Radiolabeled somatostatin receptor antagonist versus agonist for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with therapy‐resistant meningioma: Promenade phase 0 study. J Nucl Med. 2024;65(4):573‐579. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
