Table 4.
. Regulations for the use of silver nanoparticles/nanomaterials in the food and agriculture industry.
| Country/Region | Regulatory Body | Food Industry Regulations | Agriculture Regulations | Key Applications | Notes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FDA, EPA | It requires safety assessments for food contact materials; nanosilver is allowed in antimicrobial packaging. | Regulated under pesticide laws; nanosilver-based fertilizers require EPA approval. | Food packaging, pest control | Emphasis on environmental safety and human health. | (Kumari et al., 2023) |
| European Union | EFSA, ECHA | Strict limits on nanoparticle size (<10 nm) and concentrations; mandates product labeling. | Controlled under EU pesticide laws; approval is needed for specific uses. | Pesticides, biodegradable coatings | Focus on consumer safety and reducing environmental impact. | (Nielsen et al., 2023; Singh et al., 2024) |
| Japan | Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare | Requires safety evaluations for novel food additives containing nanoparticles. | Strict pre-approval for agricultural chemicals with nanosilver. | Advanced nanotechnology research | Strong emphasis on innovation and public safety. | Peters et al., 2016) |
| China | CFSA, Ministry of Agriculture | Mandates detailed safety evaluations; growing interest in regulating nanosilver applications. | Regulated under agricultural safety laws; environmental impact assessments are needed. | Food storage, fertilizers | Rapidly evolving regulations to meet international standards. | (“China Notifies for Safety Evaluation Materials for “Three New Foods” [WWW Document, 2024) |
| Australia | FSANZ, APVMA | Requires pre-market approval for food products with nanomaterials. | Nanosilver fertilizers are regulated as agricultural chemicals; safety data is required. | Veterinary products, food coatings | Strong focus on consumer and environmental protection. | (“Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority, 2010) |