Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Mar 19.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet. 2024 Nov 12;405(10474):181–183. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02255-4

Evaluating the benefits of the early use of GLP-1 receptor agonists

Peter-James H Zushin 1, Joseph C Wu 2
PMCID: PMC11921982  NIHMSID: NIHMS2060848  PMID: 39547251

Originally developed to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 receptor agonists have emerged as promising agents for weight management and cardiovascular protection, expanding their therapeutic potential beyond diabetes care.1 Since 2016, clinical trials such as LEADER,2 SELECT,3 and SURPASS4 have demonstrated the cardiovascular benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists, consistently showing a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) across virtually all formulations.5,6 These findings have expanded the therapeutic potential of GLP-1 receptor agonists beyond diabetes management, positioning them as promising agents in the treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Additionally, these new data point to the utility of introducing GLP-1 receptor agonists earlier in the progression of obesity to treat patients who may be at risk of future CVD complications, similar to current statin use as a primary prevention therapeutic, particularly given GLP-1 receptor agonists’ potential to slow disease progression by addressing obesity as the underlying cause of the plethora of other diseases. The effect of this class of medications (table) on weight loss, coupled with their demonstrated cardiovascular benefits, make GLP-1 receptor agonists possible breakthrough solutions in the treatment of obesity and its associated comorbidities. This primary prevention approach would substantially reduce the lifetime burden of chronic diseases on the health-care system and improve patients’ overall health span.

Table:

List of selected currently available and future GLP-1 receptor agonists and their targets

On the market Clinical trial status Route of administration Receptor target

Exenatide Yes Finished Injection GLP-1
Liraglutide Yes Finished Injection GLP-1
Semaglutide Yes Finished Injection or oral GLP-1
Tirzepatide Yes Finished Injection GLP-1, GIP
Dulaglutide Yes Finished Injection GLP-1
Albiglutide Yes Finished Injection GLP-1
Lixisenatide Yes Finished Injection GLP-1
Cagrisema No Phase 3 Injection GLP1, amylin
Survodutide No Phase 3 Injection GLP-1, glucagon
Retatrutide No Phase 2 Injection GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon
NNC0165–1875 + semaglutide No Phase 2 Injection GLP-1, PPY
Efinopegdutide No Phase 2 Injection GLP-1, glucagon
Danuglipron No Phase 2b Oral GLP-1
Orforglipron No Phase 1b Oral GLP-1
Amycretin No Phase 1 Oral GLP-1, amylin

GIP=glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide. PPY=pancreatic polypeptide.

Obesity, marked by a chronic state of low-grade inflammation resulting from caloric overconsumption, stems initially from dysfunctional adipose tissue.7,8 Lifestyle modifications including diet and exercise are always recommended for weight management; however, it is challenging for many individuals to adhere to these changes without substantial outside help,9 as these modifications are predicated on ready access to nutritious foods10 and time committed to a healthier lifestyle.11 Additionally, bodyweight is physiologically regulated through many integrated inputs, with adjustments in energy intake and expenditure working together to maintain a specific set point. In cases when a high body weight persists for a long period of time, weight loss can be challenging as the body tends to maintain the current set-point despite efforts at losing weight. Large-scale GLP-1 receptor agonists trials, have not always explicitly targeted obesity reduction as a primary endpoint. However, several recent trials such as STEP 1 published in 2021, focused on weight loss in individuals who are overweight (with one other CVD risk factor) or obese, and have described significant clinical reductions in body weight and waist circumference, along with improvements in cardiovascular risk biomarkers.12 The growing evidence base suggests a useful role of GLP-1 receptor agonists in primary prevention of obesity; however, more research is needed to assess these medication’s therapeutic potential in individuals at risk for a lifetime of obesity-induced diseases.

The efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists in combating obesity and its associated health risks presents a unique opportunity to improve the health of millions of individuals. Therefore, there is a compelling case for considering the early, primary prevention use of GLP-1 receptor agonists in individuals with obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2), or overweight (BMI >25 kg/m2) with indicators of future CVD risks including dyslipidaemia or hypertension, regardless of their current insulin resistance and diabetic status. This type of treatment regimen is feasible due to GLP-1 receptor agonists’ long-term safety, as shown by participants in the SELECT trial who experienced no substantial side-effects for up to 40 months.13 Currently there is no limit on the treatment period duration, with drug administration generally stopping once a lower BMI is reached. However, there remain questions on the possible side-effects such as decreased lean mass. It remains unclear whether this loss is a direct effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on the muscle or a result of improved body weight leading to the need for less mass in general.14 Taking a primary prevention approach to the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists might reduce the incidence and severity of obesity-initiated diseases including CVD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis, and type 2 diabetes, but if this is at the cost of large scale muscle loss, long-term health might be negatively affected. Another possible important consideration for GLP-1 receptor agonists primary prevention use is the reduced need for other therapies that are typically introduced as chronic weight gain leads to disease presentation, such as statins for cholesterol management or metformin and SGLT2 inhibitors for glycaemic control. Going forward, a cost modelling study should be employed to compare the relative cost of early weight management with the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus the treatment cost of obesity-related diseases that tend to appear later in life for patients who did not undergo effective weight management regimens.

The effects of weight management through GLP-1 receptor agonists extend beyond weight loss. Patients with obesity are at an increased risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and the prevalence of heart failure in this population has been underestimated.15 The use of GLP-1 receptor agonists might also help improve cardiac function through various systemic mechanisms including lipid profile modification, glycaemic control, and insulin sensitivity.16 A 2024 prespecified analysis17 of individuals at risk for ischaemic and heart failure outcomes in the SELECT trial showed improvements across measures, such as hazard ratio, MACE, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death. Additionally, semaglutide treatment improved MACE and all outcomes for people with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. These results illustrate the effectiveness of treating these populations with GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Although GLP-1 receptor agonists hold immense promise as primary prevention therapeutics, several challenges must be addressed before widespread implementation. In 2022, a study by Wilding and colleagues18 found that two-thirds of the weight loss with semaglutide was regained 1 year after treatment discontinuation. This result highlights the importance of implementing treatment in combination with lifestyle modifications to maintain long-term weight loss. These results indicate that GLP-1 receptor agonism alone is not enough to reset a metabolic set-point of a person with overweight, as evidenced by the common weight-gain recidivism described.19 Another hurdle to implementing GLP-1 receptor agonists for the primary prevention of obesity-related diseases including diabetes and CVD is the current cost of these compounds. A monthly prescription without insurance approval in the USA costs more than US$1000, pushing these treatments out of reach for socioeconomic groups that are most affected by the obesity epidemic. Lastly, the long-term effect of GLP-1 receptor agonist use in adolescents, particularly on their growth and development, needs further investigation.13 Despite these challenges, the potential of GLP-1 receptor agonists to reshape cardiometabolic disease management and improve the health span of individuals struggling with health issues stemming from chronic obesity remains promising, and it is important to continue efforts to address the barriers to widespread access to these medications.

Acknowledgments

PjHZ received grants from the US National Institute of Health (5T32EB009035). JCW received grants from the US National Institute of Health (R01 HL146690, P01 HL141084); is funded through California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) UCSF-Stanford Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation; is the immediate Past President of the American Heart Association; is on the board of directors for Keystone Symposia; serves on the FDA Cell, Tissue, and Gene Therapy advisory council; and owns stock options in Greenstone Biosciences, which is using iPSC derivatives for treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Contributor Information

Peter-James H Zushin, Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Joseph C Wu, Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

References

  • 1.Drucker DJ. The GLP-1 journey: from discovery science to therapeutic impact. J Clin Invest 2024; 134: e175634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Álvarez-Villalobos NA, Treviño-Alvarez AM, González-González JG. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 1797–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gajos G SELECT semaglutide to improve outcomes in patients with obesity and cardiovascular disease, also without diabetes. Cardiol J 2024; published online Sept 17. 10.5603/cj.102158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nicholls SJ, Bhatt DL, Buse JB, et al. Comparison of tirzepatide and dulaglutide on major adverse cardiovascular events in participants with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: SURPASS-CVOT design and baseline characteristics. Am Heart J 2024; 267: 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Verma S, Poulter NR, Bhatt DL, et al. Effects of liraglutide on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with or without history of myocardial infarction or stroke. Circulation 2018; 138: 2884–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ussher JR, Drucker DJ. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists: cardiovascular benefits and mechanisms of action. Nat Rev Cardiol 2023; 20: 463–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kawai T, Autieri MV, Scalia R. Adipose tissue inflammation and metabolic dysfunction in obesity. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2021; 320: C375–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Qi L, Groeger M, Sharma A, et al. Adipocyte inflammation is the primary driver of hepatic insulin resistance in a human iPSC-based microphysiological system. Nat Commun 2024; 15: 7991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jacobsen E, Boyers D, Manson P, Avenell A. A systematic review of the evidence for non-surgical weight management for adults with severe obesity: what is cost effective and what are the implications for the design of health services? Curr Obes Rep 2022; 11: 356–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cerceo E, Sharma E, Boguslavsky A, Rachoin JS. Impact of food environments on obesity rates: a state-level analysis. J Obes 2023; 2023: 5052613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cox CE. Role of physical activity for weight loss and weight maintenance. Diabetes Spectr 2017; 30: 157–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stumpf MAM, Cercato C, de Melo ME, Santos RD, Mancini MC. Down the rabbit hole: reviewing the evidence for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in people with obesity. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2023; 30: 1895–905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Müllertz ALO, Sandsdal RM, Jensen SBK, Torekov SS. Potent incretin-based therapy for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of semaglutide and tirzepatide on body weight and waist circumference, and safety. Obes Rev 2024; 25: e13717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Neeland IJ, Linge J, Birkenfeld AL. Changes in lean body mass with glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapies and mitigation strategies. Diabetes Obes Metab 2024; 26 (suppl 4): 16–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Borlaug BA, Jensen MD, Kitzman DW, Lam CSP, Obokata M, Rider OJ. Obesity and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: new insights and pathophysiological targets. Cardiovasc Res 2023; 118: 3434–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Iorga RA, Bacalbasa N, Carsote M, et al. Metabolic and cardiovascular benefits of GLP-1 agonists, besides the hypoglycemic effect (Review). Exp Ther Med 2020; 20: 2396–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Deanfield J, Verma S, Scirica BM, et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with obesity and prevalent heart failure: a prespecified analysis of the SELECT trial. Lancet 2024; 404: 773–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Davies M, et al. Weight regain and cardiometabolic effects after withdrawal of semaglutide: the STEP 1 trial extension. Diabetes Obes Metab 2022; 24: 1553–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fothergill E, Guo J, Howard L, et al. Persistent metabolic adaptation 6 years after “The Biggest Loser” competition. Obesity 2016; 24: 1612–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES