Table 3.
Sensitivity analysis
| Study | Parameter | Before exclusion | After exclusion | Statistical significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tang et al. [22] | OT | SMD = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.50, I² = 64% | SMD = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.53, I² = 40% | Difference |
| Sun et al. [21] | BL | SMD = -0.29, 95% CI = -0.54 to -0.04, I² = 57% | SMD = -0.17, 95% CI = -0.34 to 0.00, I² = 0% | Difference |
| Guo et al. [19] | IS ratio | WMD = 0.05, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.11, I² = 91% | I² > 50% | No difference |
| Huang et al. [20] | ||||
| Jenkins et al. [24] | ||||
| Reid et al. [27] | ||||
| Su et al. [11] | ||||
| Tang et al. [22] | ||||
| Tang et al. [22] | VAS-1 M | WMD = -0.58, 95% CI = -1.13 to -0.02, I² = 96% | WMD = -0.29, 95% CI = -0.42 to -0.16, I² = 0% | Difference |
| Reid et al. [27] | VAS-3 M | WMD = -0.36, 95% CI = -0.64 to -0.08, I² = 83% | WMD = -0.20, 95% CI = -0.32 to -0.08, I² = 0% | Difference |
| Zan et al. [26] | VAS-1Y | WMD = -0.07, 95% CI = -0.21 to 0.06, I² = 66% | WMD = -0.13, 95% CI = -0.23 to -0.03, I² = 26% | Difference |
| Dalury et al. [29] | ROM-3 M | SMD = 0.48, 95% CI = -0.00 to 0.96, I² = 85% | I² > 50% | No difference |
| Guo et al. [19] | ||||
| Huang et al. [20] | ||||
| Reid et al. [27] | ||||
| Sun et al. [21] | ||||
| Zan et al. [26] | ||||
| Su et al. [11] | HSS | SMD = 0.58, 95% CI = -0.08 to 1.25, I² = 87% | SMD = 0.20, 95% CI = -0.03 to 0.42, I² = 0% | Difference |
SMD, standard mean difference; WMD, weighted mean difference; CI, confidence interval; OT, operation time (min); BL, blood loss (ml); ROM, knee range of motion (˚); VAS, visual analogue scale score; HSS, Hospital for Special Surgery score; IS, Insall-Salvati ratio