Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 20;25:78. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02520-6

Table 1.

Simulating scenarios

S Congruence Hypothesis Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic M
1 yes H0 Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic+ m δ m
2 yes H1 Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic δ m
3 no H0 Inline graphic Inline graphic- δ (Inline graphic- δ) + m δ m
4 no H1 Inline graphic Inline graphic- δ Inline graphic- δ δ m
5 no H0 Inline graphic Inline graphic- δ*3/2 (Inline graphic- δ*3/2) + m δ m
6 no H1 Inline graphic Inline graphic- δ*3/2 Inline graphic- δ*3/2 δ m
7 no H0 Inline graphic Inline graphic- δ*2 (Inline graphic- δ*2) + m δ m
8 no H1 Inline graphic Inline graphic- δ*2 Inline graphic- δ*2 δ m

S: Scenario; Inline graphic: estimated proportion of events in the historical controls; Inline graphic: Expected proportion of events in the current controls; Inline graphic: Expected proportion of events in test arm; Inline graphic: clinically significant difference between historical and current control parameters; M: the noninferiority margin