Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 20;25:223. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05570-3

Table 3.

Association between polymorphisms FTO and NOS3 with obesity in childrens and adolescents

SNPs Genotype Total, N (%) Unadjusted OR (CI95%) p-valueb Model adjusted 1a OR (CI95%) p-valueb Model adjusted 2a OR (CI95%) p-valueb
FTO (rs1121980) GG 289 (31.4) 1.00 1.00 1.00
AG 483 (52.4) 1.52 (0.85–2.73) 0.157 1.56 (0.87–2.81) 0.149 1.53 (0.85–2.75) 0.156
AA 149 (16.2) 2.06 (1.02–4.16) 0.044 2.12 (1.05–4.32) 0.041 2.07 (1.02–4.20) 0.044
NOS3 (rs1799983) GG 528 (57.3) 1.00 1.00 1.00
TG 342 (37.1) 1.31 (0.80–2.16) 0.287 1.29 (0.78–2.13) 0.313 1.34 (0.81–2.22) 0.252
TT 51 (5.6) 2.51 (1.10–5.73) 0.029 2.61 (1.13–5.98) 0.024 2.49 (1.08–5.73) 0.032
Risk allele score (0–4) 1.33 (1.27–1.39)* 1.45 (1.13–1.89) 0.004 1.46 (1.13–1.88) 0.004 1.46 (1.13–1.89) 0.004

Legend: OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval

aThe directed acyclic graph (DAG) was used to support the theoretical model for the adjusted analysis between FTO and NOS3 polymorphism genotypes (exposure) and obesity (outcome). Analysis adjusted for the following minimum and sufficient variables, according to two possible suggested models. Model 1: adjusted for skin color. Model 2: adjusted for age, birth weight, breastfeeding, family income, glycemic and lipid profile

Collinearity among variables in the adjusted model 2 evaluated by variance inflance factor (VIF) with the maximum remaining VIF = 1.2179

bp-value corresponding to the Wald test

*Data are presented as a mean and 95% confidence interval

Risk allele score was created to evaluate the combined influence of polymorphisms in the FTO (rs1121980) and NOS3 (rs1799983) genes on obesity. This score ranges from 0 (no risk alleles) to 4 (maximum risk alleles), based on the presence of protective or risk alleles. For FTO, allele G is protective and allele A is a risk allele. For NOS3, allele G is protective and allele T is a risk allele. Although the APOB (rs693) gene was analyzed, it was not included in the genetic risk score as it did not remain significant in the univariate analysis