Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 20;207(4):54. doi: 10.1007/s00442-025-05686-4

Table 4.

Summary of 13 studies that included ecophysiology of succulent or semi-succulent species, with numbers corresponding to number of species assigned to one of four texture classes as defined here

Context of study Orthophyll* Semi-succophyll Succophyll Sclerophyll Reference Notes
Semi-arid shrubland, Spain 4 15 4 5 Grubb et al. 2015 Semi-succulent species dominated the flora
Succulent karoo, Namib Desert, South Africa 1 2 C3 2 C3 + 2 CAM 1 This paper (see Fig. 3) The most succulent flora assessed so far – water loss an inverse function of succulence; CAM spp are the most succulent
Semi-arid woodland, Argentina 27 11 15 29 Vendramini et al. 2002 Greatest texture range of all studies
Roof top candidates from Mediterranean-climate regions, grown in E Australia # 5 1 2 3 Guo et al. 2021 Survival not a function of succulence
Mistletoes and eucalypt hosts, south-eastern Australia # 0 All 4 mistletoes, some eucalypts 0 Most of 17 eucalypts Richards et al. 2021 Only extreme or mean values assessed here as raw data not available
17 ‘succulent’ and 29 ‘non-succulent’ epiphytes, cloud forest, Cost Rica # 0 17 0 29 Gotsch et al. 2022 Only means available
Halophyte, Crambe maritima, under various NaCl concentrations, including control 0 0 1 (all treatments) 0 de Vos et al. 2010 Succulence increased with NaCl concentration
Saline marshland, cool desert, NW China 5 3 6 3 Wang et al. 2015 Halophytes semi-succulent and succulent
9 species of Clusia varying in photosynthetic pathway, cultivated England 0 3 CAM/C3 + 3 C3 3 (CAM) 0 Barrera Zambrano et al. 2014 CAM species most succulent
Roof top candidates from ‘harsh habitats’, grown in cold maritime Halifax, Canada # 12 1 1 6 Lundholm et al. 2015 Plantago maritima, not Sedum, most succulent
Steppe grasslands, Hungary 14 2 1 4 Krasser and Kalapos 2000 Even grasslands may contain succulents
Succulent alpine plants, Italy # 1 4 1 0 Codigdola et al. 1987, 1990 Swollen parenchyma cells illustrated, leaf area corrected to one side rather than two
Eight populations of desert halophyte, Lycium ruthenicum, in NW China # 0 3 5 (mean) 0 Li et al. 2021 SLA values incorrect (multiplied by 104 to give cm2 g−1 as used in rest of this table)
Total 70 75 43 91  = 277

*Excludes sclerophylls, #Fresh mass corrected to saturated mass as required (see Methods)