Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 9;12:100667. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100667

Table 1.

Comparison of demographic data of the two groups of patients.

Items Control group (n = 47) Intervention group (n = 48) t/χ2/z P
Age (years), Mean ± SD 53.47 ​± ​11.34 52.90 ​± ​8.13 −0.283a 0.778
BMI (kg/m2), Mean ± SD 23.83 ​± ​3.04 24.00 ​± ​3.03 −0.179a 0.858
Marriage Married 46 (97.9%) 47 (97.9%) −0.015b 0.988
Divorced 1 (2.1%) 1 (2.1%)
Occupational status Unemployed 13 (27.7%) 24 (50.0%) 5.001b 0.082
Employed 15 (31.9%) 11 (22.9%)
Retired 19 (40.4%) 13 (27.1%)
Education level Elementary and below 7 (14.9%) 6 (12.5%) 1.921b 0.589
Junior high school 25 (53.2%) 30 (62.5%)
High school/Middle school 7 (14.9%) 8 (16.7%)
College and above 8 (17.0%) 4 (8.3%)
TNM stage I 2 (4.3%) 0 (0.0%) 2.992b 0.224
II 26 (55.3%) 23 (47.9%)
III 19 (40.4%) 25 (52.1%)
IV 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
Lymphatic node transfer With 30 (63.8%) 33 (68.8%) −0.505c 0.614
Without 17 (36.2%) 15 (31.3%)
Chemotherapy Yes 46 (97.9%) 47 (97.9%) −0.015b 0.988
No 1 (2.1%) 1 (2.1%)
Surgical location Left 21 (44.7%) 28 (58.3%) −1.3245c 0.185
Right 26 (55.3%) 20 (41.7%)

BMI, body mass index; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis. a. two independent samples t test; b. chi-square test; c. Mann–Whitney U rank sum test.