ABSTRACT
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) represent two extremes of a neurodegenerative disease spectrum characterised by overlapping genetic, clinical, and neuropathological features. This review covers the intricate relationship between both ALS and FTD and defects in the autophagy and endolysosomal pathway as recent evidence has pointed towards alterations in these pathways as being a root cause of disease pathogenesis. Here, we review the current knowledge on the interplay between ALS/FTD and lysosomebased proteostasis pathways and carefully asses the steps of the autophagy and endolysosomal pathways that are impaired by ALS or FTDcausing variants. Finally, we present a comprehensive overview of therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring autophagic and lysosomal function as potential avenues for mitigating the impact of these devastating diseases. Through this review, we aim to enhance the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms involving autophagy and/or the endolysosomal system that underlie the ALS-FTD spectrum and underscore the necessity for specific therapeutic approaches that target these shared vulnerabilities.
KEYWORDS: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), autophagy, frontotemporal dementia (FTD), lysosome, autophagosome, endosome, endolysosome, neurodegeneration
Introduction
The ALS-FTD disease spectrum
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are both fatal and progressive adult-onset neurodegenerative diseases [1,2]. The genetic, clinical and neuropathological overlap of ALS and FTD is in line with anALS/FTD disease spectrum with pure ALS and FTD at the extremes, and intermediate phenotypes distributed throughout the spectrum [3-5]. Multiple gene variants are reported to be causal for both ALS and FTD. Examples of these genes include VCP (valosin containing protein), TBK1 (TANK binding kinase 1), FUS (FUS DNA binding protein), TARDBP/TDP-43 (TAR DNA binding protein) and most commonly C9orf72 (chromosome 9 open reading frame 72) [3,4]. While in ALS, loss of both upper and lower motor neurons (MNs) located in the motor cortex, brainstem and spinal cord results in progressive paralysis and muscle wasting, FTD, is characterised by degeneration of frontal and/or anterior temporal lobes of the brain resulting in multiple deficits in language, personality or behaviour [1,2,4,6-8]. In approximately 35-40% of FTD patients and in about 5-10% of ALS patients, a familial history of the disease, usually inherited with an autosomal dominant Mendelian pattern, is present. These familial forms of the disease (fALS and fFTD) cannot be clinically distinguished from their sporadic variants (sALS and sFTD respectively) [2,4,5,7-12]. Disease onset in ALS and FTD typically starts in late midlife although both neurodegenerative disorders are characterised by a high degree of heterogeneity and variability in the disease manifestation, heritability and disease duration, the latter ranging on average from two to five years after symptom onset in ALS and three to eleven years after onset in FTD [7,8,13,14].
Both disorders are also linked at the neuropathological level by the presence of glial and neuronal proteinaceous inclusions with similar composition. In the large majority of ALS patients (~97%) and in roughly 50% of patients with FTD these aggregates stain positive for TDP-43 while aggregates containing FUS are also detected in a subset of both ALS and FTD patients [3,4,15]. About 50% of FTD patients have tau pathology, this subtype is distinct from the TDP-43 related ALS-FTD spectrum and not covered in this review. Apart from TDP-43 pathology, patients with C9orf72 ALS/FTD also present with additional aggregates containing the toxic dipeptide repeat proteins (DPRs) produced from the hexanucleotide repeat expansion (HRE) in the C9orf72 gene. These TDP-43 inclusions, as well as DPR aggregates, commonly stain positive for SQSTM1/p62, which is an autophagy receptor protein [7,16]. Moreover, while these inclusions immunopositive for TDP-43 and p62 also stained positive for ubiquitin in most ALS cases [17], ubiquitin-negative inclusions have also been reported, especially in white matter lesions of FTD and ALS/FTD patients [18-20]. While at the neuropathological level, both ALS and FTD are well characterised, the disease mechanisms underlying ALS/FTD remain incompletely understood, even despite decades of dedicated research. Moreover, treatment options for patients with ALS and FTD are limited and although more than 60 different drugs covering multiple affected pathways have been tested in clinical trials, only two of them have been approved for clinical use by the FDA and EMA: riluzole for ALS [21-24] and QALSODY® (Tofersen) for the treatment of patients with ALS due to mutations in the SOD1 gene [21,24,25]. Although Tofersen has a significant impact on the disease progression, its use is limited to patients with a SOD1 mutations. As such, multidisciplinary care focused on symptom management,quality of life and respiratory and nutritional support, remains the cornerstone in ALS/FTD clinical care [8,21,26,27].
The intricate relationship between autophagy, the endolysosomal pathway and neurodegeneration
Protein misfolding, resulting in pathological protein inclusions in glia and neurons, such as α-synuclein in PD, amyloid-β plaques and tau tangles in AD, huntingtin in HD, Tau, TDP-43 and FUS in FTD, and TDP-43, SOD1, and FUS in ALS, is considered a hallmark of neurodegenerative diseases (NDs), including ALS and FTD [28-31]. Hence, NDs are also commonly referred to as proteinopathies. These aggregates likely arise from increased wild-type or mutant protein levels due to disrupted autoregulation, protein misfolding, or impaired degradation via cellular proteostasis pathways [30,31]. Proteostasis, a contraction of the words protein and homoeostasis, is essential for maintaining neuronal health and denotes the finely tuned balance of protein concentrations within cells, mainly regulated through the proteasome, autophagy, and endolysosomal pathways [30,31]. Recent genetic, biochemical, and pathological insights across a broad spectrum of these NDs suggest that disturbances in cellular proteostasis may be the primary underlying factor driving disease onset and progression [28-33]. Moreover, the role of proteostasis dysfunction in these diseases extends beyond merely the turnover of aggregation-prone proteins or proteinaceous inclusions, profoundly impacting cellular processes such as inflammation, protein translation, energy metabolism, and various signalling cascades [34-36]. Due to the widespread accumulation of protein aggregates in ALS/FTD and related NDs, multiple groups have studied the potential of compounds that promote the clearance of these neurotoxic protein by enhancing proteostasis in the treatment of these diseases with varying degrees of success [37,38]. Among the various factors that increase the risk of NDs, ageing has by far the most significant impact, as reviewed by [39] and [40]. This is particularly important because, with ageing, the capacity of the cell to sustain proteostasis gradually collapses. Especially in neurons, the progressive decline of both autophagosome biogenesis and maturation, and the concomitant reduction of basal autophagic capacity with ageing, inherently leads to the build-up of immature and morphologically abnormal autophagic vesicles [41-44]. As a result, even healthy ageing is correlated with the widespread aggregation of non-disease proteins [40,45]. Diving deeper into this idea, and despite the general consensus on the toxicity of protein aggregation, the formation of larger protein aggregates might help mitigate cellular damage caused by toxic species of the mutated protein and/or promote their clearance through processes such as aggrephagy [46-48]. In addition, liquid-liquid phase separation of RNA-bindings proteins (RBPs) such as TDP-43, but also FUS, is actually an essential physiological process implicated in the formation of biomolecular condensates with various functional roles in cells [49]. This process can increase the local concentration of certain proteins which may either increase or inhibit their activity. Moreover, phase separation may also impact mesoscale organisation of cellular activity as seen in nucleoli involved in DNA damage repair, stress granules involved in the cellular stress response and transport granules that facilitate the transport and consequent local translation of mRNA (reviewed in [49]). However, aberrant phase transition of TDP-43, FUS, but also other ALS/FTD-related RBPs such as hnRNPA1/2, and TIA1 leads to protein aggregation and disrupts their regular cell function [49,50]. Taken together, phase separation is crucial for several cellular processes, yet when this phase separation process goes awry, it could lead to protein aggregation, a pathological hallmark in both ALS and FTD as well as other NDs [50,51].
Although an age-related decline in proteostasis seems to be present in every cell type, neurons appear to be especially susceptible to this kind of cellular stress. This is not surprising since neurons are non-dividing postmitotic cells that are particularly vulnerable to DNA damage and proteotoxic stress, as they cannot use cell division coupled with programmed cell death to effectively dilute or remove toxic protein aggregates [28,52].
Additionally, neurons are incredibly large cells with a highly polarised morphology due to their extremely long axons. Besides defects in the nucleus and cell body of neurons, axonopathies (i.e. detrimental changes in the axon) have routinely been described in ALS and FTD. More so, axonal degeneration has been proposed to precede the degeneration of neuronal cell bodies, a paradigm put forward as the “dying-back hypothesis” [53,54]. This hypothesis suggests that neuronal pathology starts at the distal ends of the neurons, a process characterised by synaptic dysfunction after which it propagates (“dies-back”) to the MN cell body. During this process, the neurons gradually lose their connection to the muscle (i.e. neuromuscular junction (NMJ)), retract their axons and degenerate [53,54]. This unique neuronal morphology does not only result in a high metabolic demand, but also implies a distinct and characteristic cell-type-specific regulation of the neuronal autophagy-lysosome system [55-60]. For a detailed description of the particularities of axon-specific regulation of the autophagic and endolysosomal pathways we refer the reader to the following reviews [55-60]. The final, and perhaps most convincing, piece of evidence directly linking autophagy dysfunction to neurodegeneration comes from genetics. Deletion of either Atg5, Atg7 or FIP200, three essential autophagic proteins, in mouse neurons results in a neurodegenerative phenotype accompanied by inclusion bodies containing polyubiquitinated proteins and mutations in several proteins involved in autophagy have been associated with ALS-FTD [61-63].
Evidence for a role of autophagy disruption in the pathogenesis of ALS and FTD
Although we will provide a brief and comprehensive explanation of autophagy and the endolysosomal system in the upcoming section, extensive overviews of these pathways lie beyond the scope of this review and are already described in detail elsewhere [43,64-69]. Autophagy, which in this review is referring to macroautophagy, is an essential and highly evolutionary conserved cellular homoeostasis pathway that is responsible for both the bulk and non-selective or selective degradation of organelles and proteins [43,64]. In the simplest sense, autophagy is a lysosome-dependent multi-step process where autophagosomes are formed that engulf and sequester cytoplasmic cargo targeted for degradation (Figure 1) [69,70]. Acidification of these autophagosomes matures them into autolysosomes where their content gets degraded and recycled. Activation of autophagy initiation canonically happens via either activation of the AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase) or inhibition of the mTORC1 (mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase complex 1) which results in dephosphorylation and the concomitant activation of the ULK1 (unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1) protein complex [69,71,72]. Subsequently, the ULK1 complex phosphorylates and activates Beclin1 [73] and Atg14L [74], two key proteins in the PtdIns3K (class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase) complex which, in turn, promotes the nucleation of a pre-autophagosomal structure also known as omegasome. This structure then further matures into a phagophore by insertion of LC3-II, the mature and lapidated isoform of MAP1LC3/LC3 (microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3) and fusion of membranous domains derived from either the plasma membrane, ER, endosomes or Golgi network a process guided by several ATG (autophagy-related) proteins [64,70,75-77]. Finally, autophagosome formation ends when the phagophore closes upon itself thereby sequestering and essentially trapping a part of the cytoplasm and the proteins/organelles it contains [43,70,76,78]. While it was previously thought that this cargo sequestration process was a passive and non-selective process, it is now recognised that autophagy can also be selective by using selective autophagy receptors (i.e. SQSTM1/p62 (sequestome1), OPTN (optineurin), NBR1 (neighbour of BRCA1) that can recognise and deliver specific cargoes (i.e. aggregates, mitochondria, lysosomes) to the phagophore [79-82]. Transport of these autophagosomes along the microtubular network then orchestrates fusion with lysosomes or (late) endosomes thereby respectively forming autophagolysomes or intermediate amphisomes that further mature into autolysosomes by additional fusion events with lysosomes [69,70]. These fusion events are mediated by multiple endolysosomal proteins such as the HOPS (homotypic fusion and protein sorting) complex, LAMP1, Rab7 and a plethora of SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive-factor attachment protein receptor) proteins. For further details on the cellular autophagosome-lysosome fusion machinery [83,84] and the transcriptional regulation of autophagy and lysosomal homoeostasis [85-87] we refer to following detailed reviews. Finally, upon maturation, the original autophagosomal membrane along with its content gets degraded by lysosomal hydrolase enzymes which are then actively exported to the cytoplasm and recycled [43,78,88].
Figure 1.

Schematic overview of the various signs that link ALS and FTD to defects in the autophagy and endolysosomal pathways. Abbreviations: ALS: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; FTD: frontotemporal dementia; TDP-43: TAR DNA binding protein; TMEM106B: transmembrane protein 106B.
While autophagy and the endolysosomal pathway are intricately intertwined by the fusion of endosomes/lysosomes with autophagosomes, the latter also stands on its own [67,76,89,90]. In brief, the endolysosomal system is an intracellular trafficking pathway that internalises material present at the plasma membrane via early endosomes. Subsequently, these vesicles either turn into recycling endosomes that transport cargo back to the plasma membrane or into endosomes that further mature into late endosomes and eventually endolysosomes (Figure 1). Upon degradation of its content, the endolysosomes condense down and reform lysosomes [67,89,91]. This maturation process is orchestrated by multiple Rab GTPases that act in a cascade fashion whereby each previous Rab catalyzes conversion to the next GTPase (reviewed by [92]). As a result, each endosomal subpopulation has its characteristic Rab GTPase population i.e. early endosomes contain Rab5, late endosomes contain Rab7, and recycling endosomes contain either Rab11 or Rab4. In order for endosomes to mature into endolysosomes, they must internalise vesicles derived from the Golgi network containing hydrolytic enzymes. Targeting of these vesicles to the endosomal network uses M6PRs (mannose-6-phosphate receptors) and after an internalisation process mediated by the ESCRT (endosomal sorting complex required for transport) complex, M6PR-containing vesicles are recycled back to the Golgi network by Rab9 and the retromer complex [91-93].
As mentioned previously, TDP-43 inclusions are a key pathological feature in ALS and FTD pathogenesis. While the exact mechanisms that drive TDP-43 aggregation are still under investigation, more and more evidence is pointing towards disruptions of endolysosomal and autophagy pathways and the concomitant reduced clearance of misfolded and/or cytoplasmic TDP-43 species as causal or at least contributing factors in this process [67,90,94-99]. First, both lysosome-dependent pathways are able and needed to regulate basal levels of TDP43 [94,100-102]. In fact, a recent study even showed TDP-43 accumulations specifically in massively enlarged multivesicular bodies (MVBs) [103]. Second, despite not being able to induce TDP-43 aggregation from scratch, inhibition of autophagy has been shown to aggravate TDP-43 aggregation in cells already containing small inclusions [104,105]. Interestingly, genetic or pharmacological disruption of endosomal maturation on the other hand was sufficient to induce TDP-43 aggregation in mice, underscoring the importance of not only autophagy, but also endolysosomal pathway disruptions to drive pathogenesis in TDP-43 proteinopathies [106]. Third, in the same mouse model that harboured mutations in two ALS/FTD genes C9orf72 and TBK1, both gene mutants acted in concert to impair endosome maturation and drive neuronal TDP-43 pathology which coincided with the presence of enlarged endosomes [106,107]. Fourth, targeting the lysosome directly by disrupting its fusion and acidification in iPSC-derived MNs also proved to induce TDP-43 inclusions [108].
In addition to the indirect evidence involving TDP-43 aggregation as stated above, careful analysis of post-mortem samples from ALS/FTD patients revealed dysregulation across different stages of the endolysosomal and autophagy pathways. A clear indicator of autophagic defects underlying disease pathogenesis is the autophagosome accumulation found in spinal cord MNs from ALS patients [109]. Evidence for defects in the endosomal recycling pathway are also present as both the endosomal recycling factor Rab11 [110] and components of the retromer complex [111] were found to be reduced in spinal cord tissue of sALS patients. Moreover, abnormal and swollen endolysosomal species are detected in tissue from patients harbouring either ALS, FTD or ALS/FTD-causing mutations [106,112-114]. Intracellular amyloid fibrils containing the lysosomal protein TMEM106B (transmembrane protein 106B), an important regulator of lysosome function, have recently been found in various NDs including ALS and FTD [115-117]. Finally, the identification of several pathogenic gene variants underlying ALS and FTD in the last decades are found to be implicated in multiple aspects of the autophagy and endolysosomal pathways (summarised in Table 1) [67,68,118-120]. Mutations in some of these genes such as on the one hand SQSTM/p62 (sequestome 1), OPTN (optineurin), UBQLN2 (ubiquilin 2), TBK1 and on the other hand GRN (granulin), VCP, CHMP2B (charged multivesicular body protein 2b), TMEM106B have a clear link to the lysosomal network causing endolysosomal and selective autophagy defects respectively. Others such as C9orf72, TARDBP, KIF5A (kinesin heavy chain isoform 5A), DCTN1 (dynactin 1), TUBA4A (Tubulin α4A chain) and FUS seem to have a more complex and indirect relationship with lysosomal pathways impacting processes such as axonal transport and RNA homoeostasis. In the following sections of this review, we will provide an update on the current evidence that links ALS/FTD-associated genes to disruptions in the endolysosomal and autophagy systems and discuss the ongoing therapeutic strategies that target these pathways in ALS and FTD (Table 1).
Table 1.
Overview of genes classified as causative or risk factors for ALS and/or FTD.
| Gene | Encoded protein | Locus | Disease phenotype | Function in autophagy and influence of pathogenic variant | Refs (still import via endnote) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBK1 | TANK-binding kinase 1 | 12q14.2 | ALS | Autophagy | [130,131] |
| C9orf72 | Chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 | 9p21.2 | ALS, ALS/FTD, FTD | Autophagy; protein aggregation; axonal transport defects; proteasome impairment | [248,249] |
| ALS2 | Alsin | 2q33.1 | ALS | Intracellular trafficking | [271,272] |
| SQSTM1/p62 | Sequestome-1 | 5q35.3 | ALS, ALS/FTD | Autophagy; proteasome impairment; protein aggregation | [178] |
| FUS | Fused in sarcoma | 16p11.2 | ALS, ALS/FTD | RNA processing; Protein aggregation | [297,298] |
| TARDBP | TDP-43 | 1p36.22 | ALS, ALS/FTD | RNA processing; Protein aggregation | [121,122] |
| SIGMAR1 | Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1 | 9p13.3 | ALS, ALS/FTD, FTD | Intracellular trafficking; proteasome impairment | [321,322] |
| OPTN | Optineurin | 10p13 | ALS | Autophagy; protein aggregation; Vesicular trafficking | [191] |
| FIG4 | Polyphosphoinositide phosphatase | 6q21 | ALS | Intracellular trafficking | [112] |
| UBQLN2 | Ubiquilin 2 | Xp11.21 | ALS, ALS/FTD | Autophagy; protein aggregation; proteasome impairment | [202] |
| VCP/p97 | Valosin-containing protein | 9p13.3 | ALS, ALS/FTD, FTD | Autophagy; proteasome impairment; ER dysfunction; Vesicular trafficking; | [149] |
| DCTN1 | Dynactin 1 | 2p13 | ALS, ALS/FTD | axonal transport defects | [458] |
| VAPB | Vesicle-associated membrane protein | 20q13.32 | ALS | Intracellular trafficking; proteasome impairment | [343] |
| TUBA4A | Tubulin α4A chain | 2q35 | ALS, ALS/FTD | axonal transport defects | [473,474] |
| SOD1 | Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase | 21q22.11 | ALS | Protein aggregation; proteasome impairment; axonal transport defects | [305] |
| KIF5A | Kinesin heavy chain isoform 5A | 12q13.3 | ALS | Intracellular trafficking; axonal transport defects | [446,447] |
| GRN | Granulin | 17q21.31 | FTD | Lysosomal function | [374,375] |
| CHMP2B | Charged multivesicular body protein 2b | 3p11.2 | ALS, ALS/FTD, FTD | Protein aggregation; autophagy | [364,366] |
| TMEM106B | Transmembrane protein 106B | 7p21.3 | FTD | Lysosomal function; axonal transport | [401] |
| CCNF | Cyclin F | 16p13.3 | ALS, ALS/FTD, FTD | Autophagy; protein aggregation | [355] |
| SPG11 | Spatacsin | 15q21.1 | ALS | Vesicular trafficking | [478] |
| PFN1 | Profilin 1 | 17p13.2 | ALS, ALS/FTD, FTD | Membrane trafficking | [213,418-420] |
aWhile more pathways can be/are affected by the ALS/FTD-related gene variants, only those directly linked to the autophagic or proteostasis pathways are mentioned.
The impact of ALS/FTD-linked gene mutations on the autophagy and endolysosomal pathway
TBK1
TBK1 (TANK binding kinase 1) is a serine/threonine kinase highly expressed in neuronal cells known to phosphorylate and thereby enhance the binding affinity of several (selective) autophagy receptors including OPTN, NDP52 (nuclear domain 10 protein 52) and p62/SQSTM1 to both LC3-II and their respective autophagic cargoes [123-129]. As a result, TBK1 is not only a key regulator of macroautophagy but also influences the efficiency of several selective autophagy pathways such as mitophagy and xenophagy (selective autophagy of bacterial pathogens) [123-129]. Despite originally associated with neuroinflammatory diseases, nearly 100 distinct mutations in TBK1 were linked to ALS and FTD in 2015 and actually are mostly seen in patients with ALS/FTD [4,130-132]. The pathomechanism underlying TBK1-associated ALS/FTD most likely results from TBK1 loss-of-function as most TBK1 mutations are either deletions that cause haploinsufficiency or nonsense and frameshift mutations that either negatively impact its function and kinase activity or result in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and reduced expression of the kinase [130,131,133-135]. While TBK1 was found to be involved in the autophagosome maturation process [124], ALS/FTD-linked TBK1 mutations seem to have the greatest impact on the OPTN-TBK1 interaction. As such, TBK1 mutants had a clear disruption in their interaction with OPTN, thereby reducing the recruitment of the autophagy receptor and LC3B to damaged mitochondria, impairing the mitophagy process and leading to the accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria [125,128-130,136]. In fact, an elaborate study by Harding and colleagues that investigated the impact of 10 ALS/FTD-linked mutations in TBK1 on mitophagy revealed that mutations that abolish either TBK1 dimerisation or reduce its kinase activity did not have a profound impact on mitophagy, while TBK1 variants that impacted both had a stronger disruptive impact on mitophagy [136]. Moreover, detailed analysis of the ALS/FTD-linked p.E696K TBK1 missense variant that also leads to a selective loss of OPTN binding revealed neuronal autophagolysosomal dysfunction and an accumulation of damaged lysosomes [137]. In addition, TBK1 has been linked to C9orf72 as it was found to phosphorylate SMCR8, the key binding partner of C9orf72, thereby activating the latter protein and promoting autophagy initiation [138]. In fact, TBK1 knockdown in neuronal cells leads to the accumulation of p62 inclusions in a SMCR8-dependent manner as phosphomimetic SMCR8 was able to reverse this phenotype, underscoring the importance of this interaction [138]. Next to its role in (selective) autophagy, TBK1 recently emerged as a key regulator of the endolysosomal pathway as well. To start, TBK1 can phosphorylate Rab7, preventing its endolysosomal translocation and inhibiting late endosomal maturation [139,140]. Moreover, a recent study validated the role of TBK1 in endosome maturation and found that loss of TBK1 activity led to TDP-43 proteinopathy [108]. Next, TBK1 was found to control the trafficking of specific cargo and membrane proteins to MVBs for their degradation [141]. Finally, TBK1 is able to recognise aberrant endolysosomal organelles and target them to the autophagy (lysophagy) pathway which is crucial for long-term integrity of the endolysosomal system [142,143]. The toxic role of TBK1 mutations seems smaller in rodents than in humans where they are rather classified as a risk factor for ALS/FTD as additional hits are needed to induce full-blown ALS/FTD pathology in mice [106,134,135].
VCP
VCP (valosin-containing protein), also known as p97, is an AAA+ ATPase that is able to regulate a diverse range of cellular processes, including DNA damage repair, membrane dynamics, but mainly cellular proteostasis. It does the latter by regulating the autophagy pathway, reticulum–associated protein degradation (ERAD) and proteasomal degradation [144,145]. Disease-associated mutations in the VCP gene occur among the entire length of the protein and are found to cause loss-of-function of the ATPase [146]. VCP mutations are linked to numerous NDs including the multisystem proteinopathy called inclusion body myopathy associated with Paget disease of bone (PDB) and FTD (IBMPDD) [147], Charcot Marie Tooth disease type 2 (CMT2) [148] and ALS/FTD [146,149,150]. Despite presenting with distinct phenotypes, histopathological analyses of VCP patients and transgenic mice show a consistent pathology consisting of inclusions positive for ubiquitin, TDP-43 and p62. This is accompanied by ER-stress, damaged and enlarged (endo)lysosomes and an accumulation of autophagosomes marked by increased levels of p62 and LC3 reinforcing the major role VCP in the regulation of autophagy and proteostasis [147,149,151-155]. Interestingly, either knockdown or pharmacological inactivation of VCP was found to negatively affect MVB formation and autophagosome maturation, leading to a dysfunction of endolysosome-mediated protein degradation [153,155-157]. In addition, VCP interacts with EEA1 and clathrin and is able to regulate endosomal size and is thought to influence endocytosis, although no recent data support the latter [157,158]. Moreover, VCP mutants have been found to disrupt the autophagy-dependent removal of stress granules [159]. In fact, most research report a role for VCP mutations in the disruption of autophagy initiation, autophagosome maturation, autophagosome-lysosome fusion, mitophagy and lysophagy ultimately leading to the accumulation of defective mitochondria, autophagosomes and lysosomes and a disruption of the autophagic flux [153-155,160-162]. Finally, a recent study found that VCP mutations induce pathological accumulation of enlarged endolysosomes, damaged lysosomes and ER stress in iPSC-derived cortical neurons [163]. Interestingly, the researchers showed that this phenotype was, at least in part, caused by a pathogenic increase of 4 R tau isoforms, linking VCP to the tau protein which is the major constituent of aggregates in ~ 50% of FTD patients [2,163].
SQSTM1/p62
SQSTM1/p62 (sequestome 1) is a multifunctional adaptor protein that is abundantly expressed in spinal cord MNs [164,165] and involved in many signalling pathways such as inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, regulation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system and (selective) autophagy (reviewed in [166] and [167]). p62 is the first discovered autophagy adaptor (or receptor) protein that is able to recognise and bind ubiquitinated cargo via its ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain and deliver them to autophagosomes through interaction with LC3 mediated by its LC3‐interacting region (LIR) for subsequent degradation [81,166-168]. In fact, since p62 itself is degraded during this process it is often used an indicator of autophagic flux [169]. Besides its well-studied role as cargo of ubiquitinated proteins, p62 also participates in aggrephagy, xenophagy, mitophagy and the selective autophagy of stress granules [126,170-172]. Activation of p62 occurs upon proteotoxic (or oxidative) stress and involves phosphorylation by ULK1, CK2 (Casein kinase 2) and/or TBK1, a process that increases its affinity for ubiquitinated cargo and enhances their removal [124,126,172-174]. In addition, p62 can also be activated by ubiquitination, which enhances it binding to and hence the removal of polyubiquitinated cargo [175,176]. Post-mortem tissue analysis revealed inclusions immunopositive for p62, that often also stained positive for ubiquitin and/or TDP-43, in both ALS and FTD patients [17-19,177]. Similar to VCP, mutations in p62 can either lead to distinct clinical phenotypes or result in a multisystem proteinopathy with coexisting signs of ALS/FTD [177-179], PDB [180] and inclusion body myositis (IBM) [181]. Most studied ALS/FTD-linked mutations in p62 are located in the promotor region and result in reduced p62 protein expression [182] or impair the recognition of ubiquitin or LC3 by p62 and thus impact cargo delivery to the autophagosome, always leading to a loss-of-function [168,177,183]. Indeed, knockdown of the p62 ortholog in zebrafish results in an ALS-like phenotype with locomotor defects, MN axon pathology and autophagy impairment [184]. Moreover, mTOR inhibition by administration of rapamycin or overexpression of wild-type p62 could ameliorate this phenotype while expression of the ALS/FTD-associated P392L p62 mutant could not [184]. Similarly, overexpression of wild-type p62 could attenuate RNA toxicity in a zebrafish model for C9orf72-ALS/FTD [185]. Moreover, p62 also interacts and exacerbates pathology associated with other ALS/FTD-linked disease proteins including TDP-43 and SOD1 [104,186]. Intriguingly, using the mutant SOD1H46R-expressing ALS mouse model to evaluate the impact of p62 knockout [186] or overexpression [187], interesting and seemingly conflicting results were obtained. Knockout of SQSTM1/p62 intuitively exacerbated disease progression by increasing the levels of insoluble SOD1 and accelerating the neuronal accumulation of ubiquitin-positive aggregates [186]. However, overexpression of SQSTM1/p62 also accelerated disease onset and shortened lifespan in this SOD1H46R ALS mouse model. Interestingly, while insoluble p62 aggregates and polyubiquitinated protein where also significantly increased in the spinal cord of SOD1H46R mice overexpressing SQSTM1/p62, these protein inclusions were mainly present in glial cells (astrocytes and/or microglia) rather than in neuronal cells [187]. These studies underscore the complexity of autophagy-associated genes in the pathogenesis of ALS and FTD and might even imply some time and context-dependent roles of autophagy during disease progression. In fact, using the established SOD1G93A ALS mouse model, in combination with a MN-specific conditional knockout of Atg7, an important autophagy gene, distinct roles for neuronal autophagy were highlighted during disease progression [165]. Inhibition of autophagy in MNs initially accelerated neuromuscular junction loss and the onset of motor symptoms, but surprisingly, extended lifespan. Detailed analysis of these mice revealed that inhibition of autophagy did not rescue MN degeneration, but rather acts in a non-cell-autonomous manner as it silenced the overall glia-mediated inflammatory response and reduced activation of the c-Jun transcription factor in interneurons [165]. This study in particular highlights the importance of taking into account disease progression when targeting autophagy as it may play distinct roles, and its modulation may have drastically different results, depending on the relative disease progression status.
OPTN
Although mutations in the OPTN (optineurin) gene were originally found to cause a specific type of glaucoma [188,189], they were later identified as a rare cause of both FTD [190] as well as ALS [189,191]. Similar to p62, OPTN is a multifunctional scaffolding protein abundantly expressed in the brain [188] and involved in various cellular function, including NF-κB activation and immune signalling, exocytosis, vesicular trafficking and autophagy [192,193]. However, OPTN is best known for its role as an autophagy (mitophagy) receptor that links ubiquitinated cargo, especially mitochondria, but also aggregates and pathogens, to LC3-positive autophagosomes via its UBA and LIR domains respectively [79,81,82,123,125,194,195] or in an ubiquitin-independent manner [195,196]. Moreover, OPTN interacts with myosin IV promoting autophagosome maturation and their fusion with lysosomes [197,198]. OPTN mutations are though to act in a loss-of-function manner as most disease-associated variants result in decreased OPTN protein levels or impair the function of the UBA domain of OPTN [190,191]. In line with this, OPTN deletion led to the accumulation of aggregates [196] and expression of various OPTN mutants causes a motor phenotype that was also characterised by a disruption in the autophagic flux [199], defects in autophagosome maturation [198] mitophagy, xenophagy and aggrephagy [123,196] and impaired phagophore formation [199,200]. Finally, an interactome study comparing wild-type to ALS-associated E478G OPTN protein revealed a dramatic reduction in the amount of interaction partner of OPTN, especially with protein involved in ER transport and proteostasis [201].
UBQLN2
UBQLN2 (ubiquilin-2) is one of four mammalian ubiquilin proteins and functions as a proteasomal adaptor protein capable of binding ubiquitinated cargoes through its UBA domain and, in concert with HSP70, shuttling them to the proteasome for degradation [202-205]. UBQLN2 is also implicated in the autophagy pathway although its role there is less well characterised and thought to be more complex [206,207]. First, UBQLN2 may act as an autophagy receptor and target ubiquitinated targets to LC3-positive autophagosomes [208,209]. Second, UBQLN2 interacts with LC3 and OPTN to promote autophagy induction and autophagosome formation [208-210]. Third, UBQLN2 was found to regulate mTORC1 activity with loss of UBQLN2 levels or activity resulting in increased autophagy induction [211]. Fourth, UBQLN2 negatively regulates CMA [206]. Last, ubiquilins, including UBQLN2, were recently found to be involved in the regulation of vacuolar ATPase levels as two independent groups uncovered two non-mutually exclusive mechanisms by which UBQLN2 interacts with the v-ATPase complex and promotes its assembly and function [211,212]. It was therefore not surprising that disruption of UBQLN2 function lead to impairment of lysosomal acidification and a reduction of the autophagic flux. Variants in UBQLN2 were found to be causative for X-linked forms of ALS and ALS/FTD [202,203,213,214], and results in the presence of UBQLN2 in neuronal cytoplasmic aggregates positive for ubiquitin, p62 and TDP-43 [202,215]. Interestingly, UBQLN2 directly interacts with TDP-43 and it known to regulate its levels through the autophagic pathway [216]. In fact, UBQLN2 overexpression is able to reduce TDP-43 aggregation providing additional evidence for a causative role for autophagy dysfunction in the development of TDP-43 proteinopathies [216]. Coinciding with its role in lysosomal function, both rodent and iPSC-derived neuronal models of UBQLN2-ALS reported enlarged LAMP1-positive vesicles that colocalized with UBQLN2 aggregates and the endosomal protein Rab5 was found to be a modifier of this pathology [217,218]. Surprisingly, UBQLN2 knockout models in mice or rats only induced mild age-dependent motor defects [219], while either increased expression of WT UBQLN2 protein or transgenic expression of ALS/FTD mutant UBQLN2 resulted in varying levels of neurodegeneration and motor defects together with the accumulation of ubiquitinated aggregates positive for p62, LC3, TDP-43 and UBQLN2 itself [215,217,220-223]. Of note, transgenic mice expressing intermediate levels of P506T-UBQLN2, which causes an aggressive early-onset form of ALS/FTD, did present with alterations in ubiquitin-dependent protein homoeostasis and the formation of widespread neuronal inclusions but lacked clear signs of neurodegeneration [224]. Indeed, a recent cellular study that compared 5 UBQLN2 mutations found a huge difference in aggregation propensity and neurotoxicity between all pathogenic variants [225]. Neuronal expression of the ALS-linked P497H UBQLN2 variant was found to exacerbate TDP-43 pathology in a TDP-43 mutant mouse model [226], suggesting that additional hits might be needed to induce ALS/FTD and that both loss- and gain-of-function mechanisms are at play in UBQLN2-ALS/FTD [224].
C9orf72
C9orf72 transcripts and protein are found in most tissues, but the highest levels are found in the CNS (brain and spinal cord) and in the immune system [227-231]. Interestingly, several studies revealed co-localisation of C9orf72 with components of the endolysosomal pathway including early/late endosomes, lysosomes, autophagosomes and phagolysosomes [138,232-240]. In neuronal cells, co-localisation with synapse-specific markers was shown and proteome analysis of the synaptosome confirmed the apparent synaptic localisation of C9orf72 [232,234,241,242]. This is consistent with the proposed physiological role of C9orf72 which is found to be involved in multiple pathways including stress granule homoeostasis, actin dynamics and axonal growth, nucleocytoplasmic transport and membrane trafficking events crucial for the autophagic and endolysosomal systems [66]. In fact, the C9orf72 protein is part of a bigger complex consisting C9orf72, SMCR8 (SMCR8-C9orf72 complex subunit), and WDR41 (WD repeat domain 41) that interacts with a variety of Rab GTPases and, although it is predicted to function as a GEF (guanine exchange factor) for these Rab proteins, recent evidence rather supports a function as GAP (GTPase-activating protein) for the C9orf72 complex [138,239,243-247]. Hence, by activating RAB GTPases, C9orf72 is implicated in the regulation of membrane trafficking events, including endocytosis, phagocytosis and multiple parts of the autophagy and endolysome pathway. In 2011, independent research groups made a groundbreaking discovery and were able to ascribe over 30-55% of fALS, 20-25% of fFTD and actually the majority of familial ALS/FTD cases to “GGGGCC” hexanucleotide repeat expansions (HREs) in the 5’ non-coding sequence of the C9orf72 gene, making it the most common genetic cause of ALS/FTD [248-250]. Healthy, unaffected individuals carry between 2-30 of these repeats, while affected C9orf72 patients present with hundreds up to thousands of repeats [248,249,251]. Three distinct but not mutually exclusive disease mechanisms have been proposed to underlie C9orf72 HRE-associated pathology [252,253]. These include C9orf72 protein haploinsufficiency triggered by reduced transcription of the C9orf72 gene alongside two toxic gain-of-function mechanisms being RNA-binding protein sequestration by C9orf72 HRE RNA-containing RNA foci and the production of five different dipeptide repeat proteins (DPRs) produced by repeat-associated non-AUG (RAN) translation of the HRE [252-254]. Multiple groups found that, when expressed in cells, flies or mice, the HRE results in the accumulation and enlargement of endolysosomes and a decreased nuclear TFEB signal [255,256]. Intriguingly, poly(GA), one of the five DPRs produced from the HRE was found to drive pathological enlargement of endosomes, TDP-43 pathology, autophagic defects and neuronal loss in mice through sequestration of TBK1, a process that is even worsened if additional mutations in TBK1 were introduced [106,257]. In addition, a recent study confirmed the detrimental effects of the C9orf72 HRE mutation on endolysosomal health and TBK1 function in iPSC-derived MNs [258]. In fact, this study revealed lysosomal transport defects, disrupted lysosomal homoeostasis, inhibition of the autophagic flux and accumulation of p62 in C9orf72-ALS patient neurons [258]. However, while C9orf72 loss-of-function did not impact endolysosomal morphology or function, an impairment in the maturation of early endosomes upon C9orf72 loss was seen [258]. Moreover, interactome screening of all five DPRs revealed sequestration and functional impairment of VCP by poly(GA), similar to TBK1, linking yet another endolysosome-related protein to C9orf72 ALS/FTD [259]. Several groups have reported defects in autophagic flux, increased sensitivity to autophagy inhibitors and (glutamate-induced) MN degeneration in C9orf72 iPSC-MNs [235,258,260-262]. Although toxic gain-of-function mechanisms clearly impact autophagy as mentioned above, most research so far has focused on the physiological role of C9orf72 in autophagy and its dysregulation in ALS. This uncovered a role for the C9orf72 protein complex in the regulation of ULK1 [119,138,263] and mTORC1 [237,264,265] reviewed in detail elsewhere [66]. Moreover, dysregulation of the interaction between C9orf72 and its several Rab-interactors not only causes defects in autophagosome biogenesis, but also impact axonal transport of autophagic vesicles and autophagosome-lysosome fusion events [138,233,235,238,239,243-246,263,266].
While the majority of the field attributes a major role for toxic gain-of-function mechanisms in C9orf72 ALS/FTD pathogenesis, mouse models revealed that C9orf72 deficiency exacerbates disease [267,268]. However, C9orf72 knockout mice presented with immune system dysregulations marked by splenomegaly, glial dysregulation and overproduction of inflammatory cytokines rather than neurodegeneration [229-231]. This discrepancy can be explained by the fact that C9orf72 mRNA levels vary a lot between the different cell populations present in the brain and spinal cord and C9orf72 is predominantly expressed in myeloid cells such as microglia and macrophages [227,228]. A recent single nuclei profiling study showed that C9orf72 was reduced mainly in microglia rather that in neurons [227]. In addition, C9orf72 knockout iPSC-derived MNs failed to show overt signs of neurodegeneration or autophagy dysfunction pointing towards a minor role of C9orf72 in neurons [258]. These results are further supported by both patient iPSC-derived microglia with C9orf72 haploinsufficiency [269] and C9orf72 knockout iPSC-derived microglia cells [270] which showed impairments of phagocytosis and a hyper-active immune response.
ALS2
Recessive homozygous missense mutations in the ALS2 gene, which encodes for Alsin, cause a rare juvenile form of ALS characterised by loss-of-function of the native protein [271,272]. Similar to C9orf72, alsin is associated with the endosomal network and the autophagy pathway by its role as a GEF interacting with Rab proteins, especially the small GTPase Rab5 [273,274]. Rab5 is a key player in endosome dynamics and autophagosome formation and ALS-linked mutations in ALS2 were indeed found to impair endosomal maturation, negatively impact the formation of autophagosomes and amphisomes and decrease the autophagic flux [273-277]. Concordantly, loss of alsin in primary neurons resulted in decreased motility and impaired maturation of Rab5-positive endosomes and a defect in the Rab5-dependent early endosome fusion process resulting in the accumulation of pathologically enlarged EEA1-positive early endosomes [278-280]. Although ALS2 has no GEF-activity towards Rab17, their physical interaction promotes Rab11-mediated recycling endosomes to transform into EEA1-positive early endosomes, a process that is probably also impacted by ALS mutations in ALS2 [281]. Simultaneous deletion of ALS2 and SQSTM1 in a model for SOD1-ALS revealed distinct but additive effects of both genes on the disease phenotype and pathology, further highlighting the role of autophagy and the endolysosomal system in ALS [186].
TARDBP
TARDBP encodes for TDP-43, a RNA/DNA-binding protein which is mislocalized from nucleus to cytoplasm where it aggregates in approximately 97% and 40% of ALS and FTD cases respectively [3,4,282]. Interestingly, the link between TDP-43 and autophagy is threefold. First, autophagy is crucial in maintaining TDP-43 protein homoeostasis as aggregated and misfolded TDP-43 as well as toxic aggregation-prone C-terminal fragments of the protein are degraded by the autophagic pathway, while soluble TDP-43 species are primarily degraded by the UPS and chaperone mediated autophagy (CMA) [94,283-285]. Second, activation or restoration of the autophagy-lysosome pathway by multiple different methods in a variety of model systems has proven to ameliorate TDP-43-related neurodegeneration [94,286-289]. Third, both toxic gain-of-function mechanisms by aggregated, misfolded or C-terminal fragments of TDP-43 and loss-of-function mechanisms of TDP-43 result in dysregulation of the autophagic pathway [100,290-293]. In fact, TDP-43 transcriptionally regulates ATG7 and ATG4B mRNAs and its aggregation results in reduced mRNA levels of ATG7 which impairs autophagy initiation [292,294]. Similarly, TDP-43 also regulates RPTOR (Regulatory‐Associated Protein of mTOR) and DCTN1 (Dynactin 1) and while loss-of-function of TDP-43 was shown to result in increased autophagosome and lysosome biogenesis in a TFEB-dependent manner by inhibiting mTOR activity, it also reduced dynactin levels, a crucial component of the autophagosome-lysosome fusion machinery [290,293]. This inevitability leads to the build-up of autophagosomes and disruption of the autophagic flux [295]. On another note, TDP-43 loss-of-function was also found to influence endosomal trafficking as knockdown of TDP-43 decreases the number and mobility of (Rab11-positive) recycling endosomes by upregulation of VPS4B, a key component of the ESCRT complex [296]. These observations underscore the multifaceted role of TDP-43 in the endolysosomal pathway and has led to the hypothesis of a negative regulatory feedback loop underlying ALS/FTD as TDP-43 sequestration into aggregates leads to reduced functional TDP-43 levels, in turn leading to defective lysosomal degradation pathways, which in turn will aggravate the TDP-43 aggregation, eventually culminating in neurodegeneration [295].
FUS
Similar to TDP-43, FUS is another RNA/DNA-binding protein which is mislocalized and aggregated in both familial ALS (1%) and FTD (5-10%) cases [3,4,297-299]. Adding to this similarity, the endolysosomal system is pivotal for the clearance of aggregated and misfolded FUS species and activation of the autophagy pathway by a variety of methods successfully lowered FUS inclusions and mitigated neurotoxicity [300-302]. Moreover, both loss-of-function of FUS and toxic gain-of-function by mutants FUS are able to directly influence autophagy. Upon depletion of FUS in neuronal like N2A cells, mRNA levels of several key factors in the autophagy initiation process are lowered including RB1CC, FIP200, ATG12 and ATG16L1 [303]. Expression of mutant FUS in neuronal cell lines negatively affected autophagosome formation and lead to the accumulation of p62 and a decrease in autophagic flux [301]. Intriguingly, these defects could be reversed by overexpression of Rab1, suggesting a potential interaction between mutant FUS and Rab1 function [301]. Finally, general overexpression of wild-type FUS in mice or N2A cells was not only associated with dysregulation of RNA metabolism, but also impaired autophagosome formation ad maturation [304].
SOD1
Mutations in the SOD1 (Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase 1) gene that encodes for an antioxidant enzyme were the first to be found causative for ALS [305]. Numerous studies have reported that stimulating autophagy or mitophagy can degrade mutant and/or aggregated SOD1 and slow down disease progression [306-312] while inhibition of autophagy aggravates neurodegeneration in SOD1-ALS models [165]. Moreover, SOD1 transgenic mice heterozygous for the autophagy regulator BECN1 showed an increase in survival while having increased p62 and reduced LC3-II levels, which is found to be mediated by an abnormal interaction of mutant SOD1 with the BECN1-BCL2L1 complex that may impact autophagy stimulation [313]. However, caution is warranted when evaluating these results in the context of SOD1-ALS as treatment of mutant SOD1 mice with the autophagy inducing drug rilmenidine effectively promoted the autophagy-dependent removal of mutant SOD1 protein but worsened MN degeneration, SOD1 aggregation and disease progression [314]. Moreover, while treatment of SOD1-ALS mice with rapamycin successfully delayed symptom onset, overall disease progression was worsened, and survival of rapamycin-treated mice was shortened when compared to untreated SOD1-ALS mice [315]. This can be explained by the possible off-target and non-cell autonomous effects of autophagy activation or inhibition [165]. Overall, the impact of SOD1 mutations on autophagy is complicated as on the one hand both mRNA and protein levels of the autophagy regulating protein TFEB were decreased in SOD1 mice [316] and mutant SOD1 (aggregates) are able to sequester essential components of the autophagy pathway such as BECN1 [313] and optineurin [317] while on the other hand, an increase of autophagy was found in SOD1-ALS mice [318,319]. Finally, researchers recently discovered that SOD1 is actively being secreted from cells by a process called secretory autophagy where autophagosomal organelles containing SOD1 protein fuse with secretory lysosomal-related organelles and undergo exocytosis [320]. Deletion of Plekhg5, an important player in this pathway, in SOD1-ALS mice led to a reduced secretion of toxic SOD1 protein species, accelerated disease onset but prolonged survival due to an attenuation of microglial activation [320]. This again highlights the importance of other cell types, especially glial cells, in neurodegenerative diseases and their treatment.
SIGMAR1
Recessive mutations in the SIGMAR1 gene encoding the sigma receptor 1 (SigR1) protein are a rare cause of (juvenile) ALS/FTD [321,322]. SigR1 is an ER chaperone protein involved in a variety of biological processes (reviewed in [323]) but expression of ALS/FTD-linked SIGMAR1 in cellular and mouse models negatively affects autophagy most likely due to a loss-of-function mechanism as SigR1 activation or overexpression can rescue these defects [324,325].Recent studies revealed that either expression of ALSD/FTD SigR1 mutants or ablation of endogenous SigR1 caused impaired endosomal trafficking and autophagic flux defects mediated by impairments in the autophagosome-lysosome fusion process [326-328]. Moreover, a recent study unveiled a novel function for SigR1 in the regulation of autophagy as the molecular chaperone was found to interact with POM121 (an important nucleoporin linked to C9orf72 ALS/FTD [329]) and regulate TFEB nucleocytoplasmic transport [330].
FIG4
Although mutations in the gene encoding FIG4 (Factor-induced gene 4) were first identified as a cause of Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT), a peripheral neuropathy, they were later also found to be a rare (1-3%) cause of ALS, especially in central European cohorts [112,331,332]. FIG4 is a phosphoinositide phosphatase crucial for the regulation of PI [3,5] P2 (phosphatidylinositol-3,5-bisphosphate) levels, a key signalling lipid in the autophagy and endolysosomal pathway, by mediating its conversion to PI [3] P (phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate) [333,334]. In fact, PI [3,5] P2 is important for retrograde endosomal trafficking, endolysosomal protein degradation and endosomal maturation [333-336]. Regulation of PI [3,5] P2 levels is a complex issue since the kinase PIKfyve, which has a function opposite to FIG4 (thus converting PI3P to PI [3,5]P2), is part of a bigger complex together with FIG4 present mainly on late endosomes where they can regulate each other activity [333,337,338]. Thus, given the known interaction with PIKfyve, FIG4 mutations could in theory either increase or decrease PI [3,5] P2 levels. Indeed, while knockdown of FIG4 dramatically increased cellular levels of PI [3,5] P2 [333], expression of FIG4 mutants in mice actually led to a reduction of PI [3,5] P2 and had negative effects on survival [331]. More specifically, both the neuron-specific and constitutive knockout of FIG4 in mice led to a neurodegenerative phenotype and the accumulation of p62, LC3-II and LAMP1/2 in astrocytes and neurons [334,339]. Interestingly, both Fig4 null flies [340] and Fig4 null mice [341] display endosomal and lysosomal phenotypes that can be rescued by the expression of either wild-type, catalytically inactive or ALS-linked FIG4 transgenes with mutations predicted to inactivate the kinase function of FIG4. Therefore, the general consensus on the mechanistic basis underlying FIG4-ALS is independent of the phosphatase activity of FIG4 but rather based on loss-of-function and the inability of FIG4 mutants to stabilise the PIKfyve complex.
VAPB
VAPB (vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein B) is an ER protein that acts as a tether between the ER and other organelles including the Golgi complex and vesicles of the endolysosomal system [342]. Mutations in VAPB represent a rare cause of ALS [343,344] and are mainly thought to achieve this toxicity through loss of VAPB’s endogenous function [345-347]. In fact, reduced levels of VAPB have been observed fibroblasts and iPSC-derived motor neurons from VAPB-ALS patients when compared to their non-carrier siblings [345] and in spinal cord MNs of sALS patients when compared to healthy controls [348,349]. VAPB interacts with many proteins that modulate autophagosome biogenesis (reviewed in [350]) but can also trigger the activation of mitophagy [351] and ER-phagy [352] by interacting with the mitochondrial PTPIP51 (tyrosine phosphatase interacting protein 51) protein or the ER-phagy receptor CALCOCO1 (calcium binding and coiled-coil domain 1) respectively. In line with this, analysis of spinal cord tissue from a mutant VAPB-ALS mouse model revealed elevated p62 and LC3 levels and an alteration of the autophagic flux [346,353]. More detailed analysis of the autophagic flux in VAPB-ALS patient fibroblasts revealed defects in both the initiation of autophagy and the autophagosome-lysosome fusion process resulting in an accumulation of autophagosomes [353]. VAPB also regulates PI4P (phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate) formation on endosomes and loss of VAPB results elevated PI4P levels in the Golgi complex and an accumulation of endosomes derived from this organelle. When an excess of these Golgi-derived endosomes fuse with lysosomes, they lead to dysfunctional lysosomes with an aberrant acidity, shape and content and hence influence both the endolysosomal and autophagy pathway [354].
CCNF
Mutations in the CCNF gene, which encodes for Cyclin F, a component of the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase complex, are a rare cause of familial and sporadic ALS and FTD [355,356]. Interestingly, cyclin F has a plethora of ALS/FTD-relevant interaction partners including VCP, TDP-43, FUS, p62, OPTN, SOD and TBK1 [357,358]. While the exact pathological mechanism of CCNF mutations in ALS/FTD remains debated, overexpression of the specific ALS/FTD-linked S621G CCNF mutation increased the interaction and led to the aberrant ubiquitylation of the autophagy receptor p62 and resulted in the impairment of autophagosome-lysosome fusion [359]. Recently, the mechanism behind the dysregulation of the cyclin F-p62 axis was uncovered as cyclin F-dependent ubiquitylation of p62 was found to regulate its ability to aggregate and form cytoplasmic foci and that expression of the ALS and FTD-lined S621G CCNF mutant causes aberrant ubiquitylation and increased aggregation of p62 [360].
CHMP2B
CHMP2B (charged multivesicular body protein 2B) is part of the ESCRT-III complex which functions in membrane deformation and regulates MVB formation and maturation, autophagosome formation, autophagosome-lysosome fusion, endosomal sorting and endolysosomal trafficking [361-363]. Although missense mutations in CHMP2B were initially associated with FTD [364,365], they were later also found in a specific ALS subgroup with lower motor neuron predominance [366,367]. Transgenic mouse models expressing mutant CHMP2B develop pathology reminiscent of ALS and FTD that coincide with the enlargement of late endosomes, an accumulation of autophagosomes, defects in autophagy and a lysosomal storage pathology [114,368,369]. Interestingly, CHMP2B knockout mice did not present with neurodegenerative phenotypes implicating a predominant toxic gain-of-function mechanism in CHMP2B-associated ALS and FTD [368]. ALS or FTD-linked CHMP2B mutants have aberrant autoregulation which results in the prolonged engagement of the ESCRT-III complex with the MVB membrane causing defects in endosome/MVB-lysosome fusion events and general endolysosomal function that coincide with autophagosome accumulation and a reduction in the autophagic flux [363,365,367,370-372]. In addition, a recent screen in mutant CHMP2B Drosophila models discovered TBK1 and dynein, two factors involved in early endosome trafficking as modifiers of mutant CHMP2B toxicity [373], adding another layer of evidence for the involvement of both endolysosomal and autophagy dysregulation in the pathology of CHMP2B-ALS/FTD.
GRN
Loss-of-function mutations in the GRN (granulin) gene cause neurodegeneration in a dose-dependent manner. Heterozygous GRN mutations result in haploinsufficiency of the PGRN (progranulin) protein and are associated with up to 10% of all FTD cases and around 25% of familial FTD worldwide [374-376]. Homozygous loss of PGRN on the other hand results in an even more severe ND and is associated with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (NCL), a type of lysosomal storage disorder which directly links PGRN to lysosomal biology [377]. PGRN is a secreted glycoprotein and neurotrophic factor that can promote neuronal survival and enhance their outgrowth [378] and which, besides its role in the regulation of lysosomal function [379,380], has a plethora of other cellular functions ranging from angiogenesis, inflammation, phagocytosis, apoptosis, cell migration and metabolic regulation (reviewed in [381] and [382]). Downstream processing of progranulin in its effector granulin fragments mainly takes place in lysosomes and requires effective lysosome acidification [383]. Defects in PGRN processing could therefore be a sign of dysregulated endolysosomal acidification and function, but since PGRN itself can also mediate lysosome acidification and homoeostasis itself, for example by aiding the maturation cathepsin D, a lysosomal protease, it not known whether this is a cause or consequence of PGRN haploinsufficiency [384-386]. In fact, reduction in PGRN levels resulted in increased lysosomal biogenesis as marked by elevated levels of lysosomal gene expression and protein levels and both cellular models of GRN-FTD as well as heterozygous or homozygous GRN knockout mice present with an accumulation of lysosomes that are unable to mature or fuse properly and have an aberrant proteome [387-392]. The relation between PGRN deficiency and autophagy is more complex as the levels of PGRN itself are controlled by the autophagic pathway [393]. Consequently, complete loss or haploinsufficiency as well as overexpression of PGRN and has been found to impair autophagic flux, implying a complex interplay and tightly regulated balance between PGRN and the autophagy-lysosome system [393-395].
TMEM106B
Although not being a direct genetic cause of ALS or FTD, genetic variants in the gene encoding TMEM106B (transmembrane protein 106B), a membrane protein especially present in neuronal and glial cells on (endo)lysosomes positive for Rab7, Rab9 and LAMP1 [396-400] and interactor of PGRN, are identified as risk factors for GRN-FTD and C9orf72-FTD [401-405]. These SNPs can either increase or decrease mRNA and protein levels of TMEM106, both of which affect lysosomal homoeostasis [399-402,405,406]. Overexpression of TMEM106B resulted in the activation of TFEB-dependent lysosomal biogenesis and these cells accumulated improperly acidified and enlarged (endo)lysosomes and autophagosomes, showed defects in MPR trafficking and an increase in the retrograde axonal transport of lysosomes [397-399,407-409]. Loss of TMEM106B in GRN or C9orf72 mouse models on the other hand yielded fewer and smaller lysosomes and caused autophagic stress, mainly due to problems with lysosomal acidification [408,410-413]. Interestingly, reducing C9orf72 protein levels was able to alleviate the lysosomal defects caused by TMEM106B overexpression in cells [409], while a reduction of TMEM106B could only partially rescue neuronal loss in a C9orf72 ALS/FTD mouse model [414] adding another layer to the complex relationship between GRN, C9orf72 and TMEM106B in lysosomal health and neurodegeneration. Finally, as mentioned before, intracellular amyloid fibrils containing a C-terminal fragment of TMEM106B have recently been found in various NDs including ALS and FTD suggesting that TMEM106B dysregulation may be a common feature associated with neurodegeneration [115-117]. However, given the fact that these fibrils are also found in the brain of aged (non-demented) individuals they could also be linked to the general proteostasis decline that is inevitably associated with the process of ageing itself [415,416]. Therefore, more research is needed to understand the formation and (pathogenic) role of native TMEM106B protein and its fibrillar counterpart in health and disease.
PFN1
PFN1 (profilin 1) is a nucleotide exchange factor that binds actin monomers and is vital for its polymerisation into actin filaments [417]. Mutations in PFN have been linked to rare familial forms of ALS and FTD [213,418-420]. Interestingly, PFN1 also binds to VCP [421], another ALS-related protein and regulator of autophagosome maturation, and PTEN [422] (phosphatase and tensin homolog), a phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase that dephosphorylates PIP3 tot PIP2 thereby also influencing the autophagy pathway. This involvement with autophagy is strengthened by the fact that mutant PFN1 protein was found to form ubiquitin -and p62-positive aggregates in the cytoplasm of cells and mouse neurons expressing ALS-linked PFN1 mutants [418,423]. Moreover, these aggregates were found to sequester both LC3 and TDP-43 [418,423]. Although these studies suggest a toxic role for PFN1 aggregates, transgenic C71G-PFN1 mice developed a fast progressive ALS phenotype and presented with elevated ubiquitin and p62 levels that eventually formed aggregates but only after disease onset was already triggered [424]. Recently, two independent groups discovered a role for PFN1 in mitochondrial homoeostasis as knockout of the actin binding protein was found critical for mitochondrial function as resulted in the activation of mitophagy [425] while expression of the M114T PFN1 mutant deregulated Rab9-dependent mitophagy [426]. Moreover, iPSC-derived microglia harbouring C71G and M114T PFN1 mutants impaired vesicular degradation pathways and phagocytosis, at least in part due to increased binding with PI3P [427].
As mentioned previously, neurons have a specialised cell-type-specific regulation of the autophagy-lysosome pathway owing to their highly polarised nature [55-60]. Axonal transport is of specific importance as its dysfunction is observed in several NDs including ALS and FTD and is considered an early pathogenic feature [428-430]. Neuronal axonal transport is crucial for the proper functioning of the autophagy system as autophagosomes are formed distally at the synapses and require retrograde trafficking to the soma in combination with anterograde trafficking of (endo)lysosomes in order to fuse and mature [60,430]. Preclinical data obtained in murine or iPSC models of the major familial ALS subtypes revealed axonal transport defects due to pathogenic variants in the genes encoding for FUS [431-433], SOD1 [434-436], TARDBP [437-439] and C9orf72 [440-443]. Moreover, mutations in components of the axonal transport machinery including KIF5A, DCTN1, TUBA4A and SPG11 have been directly linked to ALS/FTD.
KIF5A
Mutations in the gene encoding KIF5A (kinesin 5A), a neuron-specific anterograde molecular motor protein, are causative for hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) [444], Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 (CMT2) [445] and ALS [446,447]. Interestingly, while pathogenic variants associated with ALS are located in the tail (cargo-binding)- domain of the molecular motor, CMT and SPG-linked mutations mainly reside in the motor (microtubule-binding) domain of KIF5A [448]. Lysosomes and mitochondria are among the most common cargos of KIF5A, linking it to general autophagy and mitophagy respectively [449,450]. Indeed, deficiency of KIF5A results in axonal transport defects that impair the autophagic flux and provide evidence for a loss-of-function toxicity mechanism in KIF5A-ALS [449]. However, the recently discovered KIF5A variants that cause exon 27 skipping (KIF5A ΔExon27) also suggest a toxic gain-of-function role as these mutations result in KIF5A proteins with altered C-terminal domains that are prone to form neurotoxic aggregates, while also having an increased microtubule processivity resulting in dysregulated axonal transport [450-452].
DCTN1
DCTN1 (Dynactin subunit 1) is the largest component of the dynactin protein complex that interacts with the retrograde motor protein dynein in order to initiate and stimulate retrograde transport [453,454]. This is achieved by enhancing the processivity of its transport and by functioning as an adaptor protein to tether organelles (including endosomes, lysosomes and autophagosomes), RNA granules and other specific cargos to dynein [455,456]. Mutations in DCTN1 have been linked to various TDP-43 proteinopathies such as Perry syndrome [457], lower motor neuron disease [458], ALS [459,460] and ALS/FTD [461]. Interestingly, all these DCTN1-linked NDs are characterised by TDP-43 pathology hinting towards a direct link between axonal transport and TDP-43 proteinopathies [462]. Although some ALS-causing DCTN1 mutations did not significantly alter DCTN1 protein structure, most DCTN1 mutants disrupt the interaction of the protein with either dynein or microtubules resulting in toxic aggregates containing mutant DCTN1, its cargo and TDP-43 [463,464]. Furthermore, while heterozygous germline knock-out [465] or complete neuron-specific ablation [466] of DCTN1 in mice only resulted in no or very mild MN degeneration, heterozygous knock-in of the G59S mutation lead to halving of DCTN1 protein levels accompanied with MN degeneration, astrogliosis, defective vesicular transport and the accumulation of LC3-II-positive DCTN1 aggregates [463,465,467]. Although the evidence stated above mainly points towards a gain-of-function mechanism in DCTN1-ALS, multiple studies reported that reducing or ablating the levels of the DCTN1 orthologues in either C.elegans [468], Drosophila [469] or zebrafish [470] results in motor deficits and axonal pathology independent of DCTN1 aggregation. Finally, analysis of post-mortem tissue from sALS patients identified reduced levels of DCTN1 mRNA in MNs [471] and lower DCTN1 protein levels in the motor cortex [472]. Thus, while the involvement of DCTN1 mutations in ALS/FTD pathogenesis is clear, the question whether these mutations cause disease through gain -or loss-of-function remains a source of debate and requires further investigation.
TUBA4A
TUBA4A (α-tubulin isoform 4a) encodes one of nine eukaryotic α-tubulin isotypes which heterodimerize with β-tubulin to form the microtubule network. Despite being ubiquitously expressed, TUBA4A is particularly enriched in the nervous system [473] and albeit rare, mutations in TUBA4A were found to be causal for familial cases of ALS and ALS/FTD [473,474]. Moreover, additional mutations in the TUBA4A gene were observed in sporadic patients [475] and a general decrease of TUBA4A protein levels have been described in ALS-affected brain regions [476,477]. Although inclusions containing mutant TUBA4A can be formed, these data mainly support a loss-of-function mechanism. Indeed, a recent study reported that knockdown of the TUBA4A orthologue in zebrafish induced an ALS phenotype with MN abnormalities and defects in motor behaviour [477]. The gross majority of TUBA4A mutations reside in the interaction domains with either β-tubulin and affect tubulin dimerisation, microtubule stability and dynamics or with the molecular motor proteins dynein and kinesin thereby impairing microtubule-based axonal transport [473-475]. In conclusion, most evidence linking autophagy to TUBA4A mutations involve the disruption of dynein-based retrograde transport of autophagosomes and concomitant impairment of autolysosome formation through a loss-of-function mechanism.
SPG11
SPG11 (spastic paraplegia 11) encodes for the spatacsin protein and although its function not being completely understood, is thought to control gene regulation, vesicular trafficking and axonal maintenance. Mutations in SPG11 are linked to both hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) and juvenile ALS [478-480]. Loss of spatacsin function results in autophagy defects marked by a reduction in lysosome number and accumulation of autophagosomes and has an overall detrimental effect on lysosomal pathways due to reduced lysosomal reformation and biogenesis [481-483], dysfunctional anterograde axonal trafficking [484,485] and impaired clearance and hence the accumulation of cholesterol in lysosomes [486].
Therapeutic strategies targeting autophagy for the treatment of ALS and FTD: challenges and limitations
While recent overviews of the clinical trial landscape [23] and antisense therapies [487] in ALS have been published recently, we will use the following sections to discuss the promising pipeline of clinical trials and preclinical methods that involve modulation of the autophagy and/or endolysosomal pathways and the inherent challenges that are associated with modulation of the ALP (Figure 2). The overview given in Figure 3 exemplifies the immense complexity of the autophagy and endolysosomal pathways and mutations that impact different stages of those pathways even within the ALS-FTD spectrum. At this stage, it is difficult to envision how to best modulate autophagy as we don’t know enough about how the ALP is altered in different subtypes of ALS and FTD. Therefore, it is not only crucial to further identify the specific stage(s) of the pathways that are defective in each ALS/FTD subtype, but also indispensable to stratify patients by genotype in future clinical trials. For example, enhancing autophagosome formation may have therapeutic potential when patients present with defects early in the autophagy pathway, but no effect when defects in later stages of the pathway are present. In case of defects in later stages of the autophagy pathway (i.e. autophagosome-lysosome fusion, lysosomal clearance, etc.), boosting autophagosome formation may not be suitable and could even aggravate the problems as this would lead to toxicity by the accumulation of autophagosomes that may serve as a platform for the intracellular death-inducing signalling complex (iDISC) that recruits caspase-8 to initiate apoptosis [488]. Since most ALS/FTD-linked mutations impact various stages of the ALP, combinatorial approaches that combine drugs working at different stages of the pathway may be needed to restore autophagic flux as each drug may have an additive beneficial effect. However, the use of combinatorial approaches has the downside of inducing more potential adverse side effects which has already been a major problem in the past when modulating the ALP since most drugs target important signalling nodes (i.e. mTORC1, ULK1, etc.) that also affect other cellular pathways. In addition, timing of ALP treatments should also be considered as some drugs may be beneficial at early disease stages but toxic at later stages and vice versa. An example that perfectly illustrates this complexity is the treatment of SOD1G93A mice with trehalose which promotes autophagy in a TFEB-dependent manner [489,490]. While treatment with this natural disaccharide delayed disease onset, initially alleviated motor deficiency and concomitantly reduced mutant SOD1 and p62 levels, trehalose treatment failed to delay further disease progression after reaching a certain threshold and was ultimately not able to improve survival in these mice [490]. In MN, autophagy is essential for NMJ maintenance in the early stages of the disease, but may eventually aggravate disease progression through non-cell-autonomous disease mechanisms in later disease stages [165]. For example, mouse models for SOD1-ALS that have an additional TBK1 mutation showed increased autophagy dysfunction and faster muscle denervation at early stages of the disease, but managed to reduce neuroinflammation and improve survival at later stages [134,135]. Overexpression of SQSTM1/p62 in SOD1H46R ALS mice accelerated disease onset, but slowed down disease progression and had little to no impact on neuronal survival, but had a more profound effect on the surrounding glial cells [187]. Although BECN downregulation had a positive effect on survival in the aggressive SOD1G86R transgenic ALS mice, a similar study that investigated the effects of heterozygous BECN1 deletion in two other, less aggressive SOD1 ALS mouse models (SOD1G127X and SOD1G93A), conversely reported an exacerbation of the disease upon BECN reduction marked by an increase in disease onset, disease progression, MN degeneration and a significant decrease in survival [491]. This suggests that even within one genetic subtype of ALS, different levels of manipulation of the ALP at the same level can have a differential impact. The efficacy of some treatments may attenuate with disease progression (reviewed in [492]). Therefore, we may need to consider clinical trial designs and genetic testing strategies that allow the administration of therapies to prevent or slow down initial disease manifestations. In recent years, substantial progress has been made in our understanding of autophagic and endolysosomal defects in NDs including ALS and FTD. However, the amount of drugs moving to clinical trials and the translational success rates remain low (Table 2) [493]. This may be in part caused by a lack of understanding the dynamics of the ALP, especially during disease progression and hence the inability to correctly define a specific treatment window for specific ALP targets. Moreover, we are also in dire need of effective methods to measure (cell-type specific) target engagement and track autophagic flux in vivo. Therefore, novel imaging techniques in combination with suitable biomarkers of ALP dysfunction are indispensable for the translational success of such treatments.
Figure 3.

Therapies currently being tested in clinical trials for ALS and/or FTD. Abbreviations: AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; ATF4: activating transcription factor 4; eIF2B: eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2B; GADD34: growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible protein; GSK-3β: glycogen synthase kinase-3β; MAP2K/MEK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; mTORC1: mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase complex 1; TFEB: transcription factor EB; ULK1: unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1.
Figure 2.

Comprehensive overview of the endolysosomal and autophagy pathways and the specific parts of these pathways that are affected by ALS -or FTD-related genes and risk factors. Various gene variants causative for ALS and/or FTD (depicted in red) have an impact on the endolysosomal and autophagy pathway at different levels (depicted in purple). Abbreviations: AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; ATG: autophagy-related; LAMP1/2: lysosomal associated membrane protein 1/2; MAP1LC3-II/LC3-II: microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3 (lipid modified); M6PR: mannose-6-phosphate receptor; mTORC1: mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase complex 1; NBR1: NBR1 Autophagy Cargo Receptor; OPTN: optineurin; PI3KC3: phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 3; SQSTM1/p62: sequestome 1; TFEB: transcription factor EB; ULK1: unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1.
Table 2.
Overview of drugs currently in clinical trials for ALS and/or FTD that target the ALP.
| Drug | Company | Mechanisms of action | ALS/FTD subtype | Development stage | Trial identifier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trametinib | GENUV | Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK/MAP2K) inhibitor that should activate the autophagy-lysosome pathway | ALS | Phase 1/2a | NCT04326283 |
| Trehalose | Seelos Therapeutics | Dissacharadi with neuroprotective properties that acts by clearing protein aggregates, possibly through activation of autophagy. | ALS | Phase 2/3 (completed) | NCT04297683 + NCT 05136885 |
| Apilimod dimesylate | OrphAI Therapeutics | PIKfyve inhibitor | C9orf72-ALS | Phase 2a | NCT05163886 |
| Monepantel | PharmAust | Repurposed veterinary drug, found to have off-target activity, inhibiting an mTORC1 signalling system and thereby reducing protein accumulation. | ALS | Phase 1 | NCT04894240 |
| Rapamycin | Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena | Inhibitor of mTORC1 that aims to enhance autophagy | ALS | Phase 2 (completed) | NCT03359538 + EUDRACT 2016-002399-28 |
| Bosutinib | Pfizer Japan Inc./Kyoto University | Repurposed chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML) drug functioning as a selective inhibitor of Src/c-Abl tyrosine kinase, promoting autophagy | ALS | Phase 2 (completed) | NCT04744532 |
| DNL-343 | Denali Therapeutics | eIF2B activator that inhibits the integrated stress response pathway and influences autophagy progression | ALS | Phase 1b | NCT05006352 |
| ABBV-CLS-7262 | Calico/AbbVie | eIF2B activator that inhibits the integrated stress response pathway and influences autophagy progression | ALS | Phase 1 | NCT04948645 |
| IFB-088 | InFlectis BioScience | Inhibition of GADD34, a protein involved in the integrated stress response (ISR) and an important TFEB target, needed to sustain lysosomal biogenesis and enhance autophagic flux during starvation. | ALS | Phase 2 | EudraCT 2021-003875-32 |
| AL001 | Alector | monoclonal antibody designed to elevate progranulin levels and increase lysosomal health | C9orf72-FTD | Phase 3 (completed) | NCT04374136 + NCT03987295 |
| DNL593 | Denali Therapeutics | replacement therapy consisting of progranulin protein fused to an antibody fragment that facilitates the receptor-mediated transcytosis of progranulin into the brain. | GRN-FTD | Phase 1/2 | NCT05262023 |
| FRM-0334 | FORUM Pharmaceuticals | histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that aims to increase expression of progranulin | GRN-FTD | Phase 2 | NCT02149160 |
| PBFT02 | Passage Bio | AAV1 vector gene therapy designed to deliver a copy of the human progranulin gene to the brain. | GRN-FTD | Phase 1b | NCT04747431 + EUDRACT 2020-004499-17 |
| LY3884963 | Eli Lilly & Co | AAV9 vector gene therapy designed to deliver a copy of the human progranulin gene to the brain. | GRN-FTD | Phase 1/2 | NCT04408625 |
| AVB-101 | AviadoBio | AAV9 vector gene therapy designed to deliver a copy of the human progranulin gene under control of a neuron-specific promoter to the brain. | GRN-FTD | Phase ½ | NCT06064890 |
Small molecule modulators of the ALP
As mentioned earlier, targeting upstream signalling hubs and regulators of the ALP such as mTORC1 may cause adverse and unwanted effects due to the intricate intertwinement with other signalling cascades, mainly pathways involved in regulation of the immune system [494]. However, multiple compounds have been found to activate autophagy and show promising results in preclinical studies, especially with regards to TDP-43 pathology [288,489,495]. These small molecule modulators include mTORC1 inhibitors such as rapamycin, spermidine and berberine but also compounds that modulate lysosomal function including tamoxifen, fluphenazine, methotrimeprazine and promethazine and mTORC1-independent autophagy activators such as trehalose, carbamazepine, lithium carbonate and trametinib that work by altering TFEB and AMPK signalling, inositol signalling or modulation of the GSK-3β (glycogen synthase kinase-3β) or mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP2K/MEK) pathways respectively [288,489,495-497]. We would like to highlight the use of TFEB modulators which have the potential to simultaneously induce autophagosome synthesis and improve lysosomal function [85,86,498]. As such, several groups have and are currently pursuing this therapeutic avenue and are evaluating the efficacy of (natural) small-molecule TFEB activators in preclinical models of ALS/FTD and other NDs [489,499-502]. Moreover, another intriguing strategy that could increase nuclear TFEB levels and hence its activity is the use of selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINEs) which was able to activate autophagy and significantly increase lifespan in C. elegans [503]. Moreover, recent studies have identified altered signalling of the Src/c-Abl tyrosine kinase in several NDs, including ALS. Overactivation of Src/c-Abl was found to reduce autophagic flux and negatively affect the lysosomal pathway mediated, at least in part, through reduced TFEB signalling [504,505]. Bosutinib, a selective inhibitor of this kinase was found to promote autophagy and restore the autophagic flux in preclinical models [505]. Just recently, an open-label phase 2 clinical trial on bosutinib sponsored by Pfizer Japan (NCT04744532) was successfully completed with acceptable safety and tolerability [506]. Finally, PIKfyve inhibitors show promise in preclinical studies in multiple forms of ALS/FTD is currently being tested in a phase 2a clinical trial [235,507-509], but also here caution is warranted. As mentioned earlier, PIKfyve is a kinase that catalyzes the conversion of PI3P to PI [3,5]P2 which is present on endolysosomal and autophagosomal membranes and thereby acts as a regulator of vesicle fusion [333,335-337,510]. PIKfyve inhibitors such as Apilimod were found to not only enhance autophagosome and lysosome formation and increase early endosome numbers, but also activate an alternative proteostasis mechanism that involves the exocytosis of aggregated proteins in models of sporadic, FUS-, TDP43- and C9orf72-ALS [235,507,508,510-512]. However, by increasing PI3P levels in the cell, PIKfyve inhibitors prevent Rab5 to Rab7 conversion and hence early endosome maturation [235,507,508]. Moreover, PIKfyve inhibition might negatively affect autophagosome-lysosome fusion, driving cells to pursue other methods such as secretory autophagy to eliminate protein aggregates [511,512]. While this approach protects the cell from the neurotoxic effects of the protein aggregates, it might actually worsen disease progression if these exosomes get taken up by healthy cells. In addition, prolonged treatment with PIKfyve inhibitors could lead to the accumulation of enlarged early endosomes, a trigger known to induce TDP-43 proteinopathy and cause neurodegeneration [106,335]. Therefore, it is unclear whether the initial neuroprotective effect of PIKfyve inhibition is persistent or rather short-lived as it could eventually be counteracted by its detrimental effects on neurotoxic protein propagation and endosomal maturation [67,106,511].
Another emerging therapeutic approach are the so called “synthetic molecular glues and protein degraders” [513,514]. These molecular glues are small molecules that stabilise (specific) protein-protein interactions and could therefore by used to specifically increase the affinity of neurotoxic proteins with components of the proteostasis network such as LC3, p62, or components of the UPS. Protein degraders work by targeting specific proteins for degradation by the proteasome or autophagolysosome. Focusing on the latter pathway, this can be achieved by either therapeutic antibodies, AuTophagosome-TEthering Compounds (ATTECs) or AUtophagy TArgeting Chimeras (AUTACs). While ATTECs work by directly tethering specific target protein to the autophagosome membrane which are then delivered to the lysosome for degradation, AUTACs indirectly mark specific target proteins with a tag that serves as a degradation signal, mimicking endogenous autophagy signalling pathways [513,514].
With respect to FTD, the translation of ALP-targeting small molecules into the clinic remains rather sparse. Similar to the genetic therapies tested for FTD (see below), several therapeutic strategies for FTD try to restore or increase PGRN levels and hence ameliorate lysosomal health (Table 2). Clinical trials sponsored by Alector, Denali Therapeutics and FORUM Pharmaceuticals aim to achieve this by using a monoclonal antibody designed to elevate progranulin levels, a replacement therapy consisting of progranulin protein fused to an antibody fragment that facilitates the receptor-mediated transcytosis of progranulin into the brain or the use of an histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor in order to increase expression of progranulin, respectively.
Genetic therapies to target ALP dysfunction in ALS/FTD
Genetic therapies are further classified into gene silencing therapies that aim to inhibit the expression of toxic genes by targeting their mRNAs with RNA interference (RNAi) or antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), gene editing therapies that utilise the CRISPR–Cas9 gene editing machinery or other programmable nucleases to either correct or introduce pathogenic gene mutations and lastly gene replacement therapies that comprise the use of (viral) vectors to deliver functional copies of mutant genes [515-517]. ASOs are chemically modified single-stranded oligonucleotides designed to specifically target certain mRNAs. By doing so, they can either attract RNAse H and degrade the target mRNA which holds promise for conditions where a toxic gain-of-function is primarily involved. Depending on the modifications of the ASO, binding to its target can alter processing of the mRNA and hence modulate translation, localisation or alternative splicing of its target, a strategy suitable to tackle some loss-of-function mechanisms (reviewed in Van Daele et al. 2023) [487]. We previously mentioned the unprecedented success of QALSODY® (Tofersen) for the treatment of SOD1-ALS patients and a FUS-targeting ALSO seems to hold promise as well [487,518,519]. The first attempts to target sense repeat containing transcripts in ALS-FTD patients with a C9orf72 repeat expansion were not successful, although the production of several DPRs was clearly reduced [520]. Nevertheless, ASOs are also being designed to target specific molecular pathways affected in ALS/FTD. One such example is PIKfyve ASO-mediated silencing by AS-202. Similar to the results obtained with small-molecule inhibitors of the kinase, PIKfyve silencing rescues neurodegeneration in iPSC-derived MNs [511]. CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing are the most recent addition to the pool of gene therapies and although they have opened up a whole new window of therapeutic opportunities, substantial progress in terms of safety and efficacy is still needed to optimise this kind of therapy for clinical use. Nevertheless, preclinical studies on C9orf72 ALS/FTD patient iPSC-MNs underscored the therapeutic potential of CRISPR-mediated gene alterations as a recent study could successfully delete part of the C9orf72 promotor region and hence reduce the production of toxic DPR proteins and rescue neurodegeneration [521]. Alternatively, a promising study explored the use of the RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas13 system for the treatment of C9orf72 ALS/FTD [522]. Using this approach, multiple RNA transcripts can be successfully targeted using an adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector. While this therapy holds tremendous promise for its use in C9orf72 ALS/FTD and possibly other diseases characterised by toxic RNA gain-of-function mechanisms, further research on its long-term efficiency, off-target effects and safety are needed. Finally, gene replacement therapies hold great potential for ALS/FTD subtypes mainly caused by pathogenic loss-of-function mechanisms. While several ALS-associated genes could potentially benefit from such treatment (reviewed in detail by Giovannelli et al., 2023), there are no ongoing clinical trials for ALS [515]. In contrast, three separate and promising clinical trials for GRN-FTD are underway to explore the use of AAV-mediated delivery of human progranulin genes to the brain in order to restore progranulin expression. Interim results from one of those studies revealed that treatment with the investigational gene therapy showed good efficacy in preclinical cellular and rodent models of GRN-FTD and was found to be generally safe and relatively well-tolerated in non-human primates and patients suffering from GRN-FTD [523]. However, whether it can also boost lysosomal function and the outcome of patients requires further study.
Concluding remarks and future prospectives
Decades of research have established a profound link between alterations of the autophagy and endolysosomal pathways and ALS/FTD pathogenesis. The known role of autophagy in aggregate removal has been known for a long time, but the insights into the role of endolysosomal dysfunctions are emerging more recently and have often been overlooked in the past. Several recent studies underscoring the inherent relationship between endolysosomal system dysfunctions and the development of TDP-43 proteinopathy, highlight the importance of this pathway, which will hopefully provide novel therapeutic targets in the upcoming years. A better and more profound understanding of each part of the autophagic pathway (in neurons, but also in different supporting glial cells) in the different genetic subtypes of ALS/FTD is required for the development of effective therapies. The advent of molecular strategies to combat ALS and FTD has really been a beacon of hope for many patients suffering from these devastating diseases. New therapeutic approaches intervening with autophagy and the endolysosomal pathways will ultimately bring clarity about the importance of these pathways for ALS/FTD.
Disclosure statement
JB has nothing to disclose. PVD has served in advisory board meeting (paid to institution) for Biogen, CSL Behring, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Ferrer, QurAlis, Cytokinetics, Argenx, UCB, Muna Therapeutics, Alector, Augustine Therapeutics, VectorY, Sapreme Technologies, Novartis, Prilenia Therapeutics, Trace Neuroscience, NRG Therapeutics.
Funding
PVD is supported by grants from KU Leuven (C1 - C14/22/132), Opening the Future Fund (KU Leuven), the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO Vlaanderen n° G026125N, G073222N), Target ALS (FS-2024-ESC-S1), the ALS Liga België and the KU Leuven funds “Een Hart voor ALS” and “Laeversfonds voor ALS Onderzoek”. PVD holds a fundamental clinical investigatorship of KU Leuven.
Abbreviations
AD: Alzheimer’s Disease; ALS: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; ALS2: Alsin; ALP: Autophagy-Lysosome Pathway; AMPK: AMP-Activated Protein Kinase; ASO: Antisense Oligonucleotide; ATG: Autophagy-Related; ATTEC: AuTophagosome-TEthering Compound; AUTAC: AUtophagy TArgeting Chimera; AAV: Adeno-Associated Virus; C9orf72: Chromosome 9 Open Reading Frame 72; CCNF: Cyclin F; CHMP2B: Charged Multivesicular Body Protein 2B; CMT: Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease; DCTN1: Dynactin 1; DPR: Dipeptide Repeat Protein; EEA1: Early Endosome Antigen 1; ERAD: Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Degradation; ER-phagy: Endoplasmic Reticulum Autophagy; ESCRT: Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport; FIP200: Focal Adhesion Kinase Family Interacting Protein of 200 kDa; FTD: Frontotemporal Dementia; FUS: FUS DNA Binding Protein; GAP: GTPase-Activating Protein; GEF: Guanine Exchange Factor; GRN: Granulin; GSK-3β: Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 Beta; HD: Huntington’s Disease; HDAC: Histone Deacetylase; HOPS: Homotypic Fusion and Protein Sorting; HRE: Hexanucleotide Repeat Expansion; HSP: Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia; HSP70: Heat Shock Protein 70; IBMPDD: Inclusion Body Myopathy Associated with Paget Disease of Bone and Frontotemporal Dementia; iDISC: Intracellular Death-Inducing Signaling Complex; iPSC: Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells; KIF5A: Kinesin Heavy Chain Isoform 5A; LAMP1: Lysosomal-Associated Membrane Protein 1; LC3: Microtubule-Associated Protein 1 Light Chain 3; LIR: LC3-Interacting Region; MAP2K/MEK: Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase; MN: Motor Neuron; MPR: Mannose-6-Phosphate Receptor; MVB: Multivesicular Body; mTORC1: Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Kinase Complex 1; NBR1: Neighbor of BRCA1; NCL: Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis; ND: Neurodegenerative Disease; NDP52: Nuclear Domain 10 Protein 52; OPTN: Optineurin; PDB: Paget’s Disease of Bone; PGRN: Progranulin; PI(3,5)P2: Phosphatidylinositol 3,5-Bisphosphate; PI(3)P: Phosphatidylinositol 3-Phosphate; PI4P: Phosphatidylinositol 4-Phosphate; PtdIns3K: Class III Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase; PTEN: Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog; RAN: Repeat-Associated Non-AUG; RNAi: RNA Interference; SINEs: Selective Inhibitors of Nuclear Export; SigR1: Sigma Receptor 1; SMCR8: Smith-Magenis Syndrome Chromosome Region Candidate Gene 8; SNARE: Soluble N-Ethylmaleimide-Sensitive Factor Attachment Protein Receptor; SOD1: Superoxide Dismutase 1; SPG11: Spastic Paraplegia 11; SQSTM1/p62: Sequestosome 1/p62; TANK: TANK Binding Kinase 1; TARDBP/TDP-43: TAR DNA Binding Protein 43; TBK1: TANK Binding Kinase 1; TFEB: Transcription Factor EB; TMEM106B: Transmembrane Protein 106B; TUBA4A: Tubulin α4A Chain; ULK1: Unc-51 Like Autophagy Activating Kinase 1; UPS: Ubiquitin-Proteasome System; VAPB: Vesicle-Associated Membrane Protein-Associated Protein B; VCP/p97: Valosin Containing Protein.
References
- [1].van Es MA, Hardiman O, Chio A, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet. 2017;390(10107):351–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Bang J, Spina S, Miller BL.. Frontotemporal dementia. Lancet. 2015;386(10004):1672–1682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Burrell JR, Halliday GM, Kril JJ, et al. The frontotemporal dementia-motor neuron disease continuum. Lancet. 2016;388(10047):919–931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Abramzon YA, Fratta P, Traynor BJ, et al. The overlapping genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Nijs M, Van Damme P. The genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2024;37(5):560–569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Brown RH, Al-Chalabi A, Longo DL. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(2):162–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Masrori P, Van Damme P. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a clinical review. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27(10):1918–1929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Olney NT, Salvatore S, Miller BL. Frontotemporal dementia. Dementia, Fifth Edition. 2017;35:749–758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Taylor JP, Brown RH, Cleveland DW. Decoding ALS: from genes to mechanism. Nature. 2016;539(7628):197–206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Suzuki N, Nishiyama A, Warita H, et al. Genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: seeking therapeutic targets in the era of gene therapy. J Hum Genet. 2023;68(3):131–152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Shatunov A, Al-Chalabi A. The genetic architecture of ALS. Neurobiol Dis. 2021;147:105156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Greaves CV, Rohrer JD. An update on genetic frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol. 2019;266(8):2075–2086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Swinnen B, Robberecht W. The phenotypic variability of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(11):661–670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Coyle-Gilchrist ITS, Dick KM, Patterson K, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and survival of frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes. Neurology. 2016;86(18):1736–1743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Neumann M, Sampathu DM, Kwong LK, et al. Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science. 2006;314(5796):130–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Donde A, Sun M, Ling JP, et al. Splicing repression is a major function of TDP-43 in motor neurons. Acta Neuropathol. 2019;138(5):813–826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Arai T, Nonaka T, Hasegawa M, et al. Neuronal and glial inclusions in frontotemporal dementia with or without motor neuron disease are immunopositive for p62. Neurosci Lett. 2003;342(1–2):41–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Hiji M, Takahashi T, Fukuba H, et al. White matter lesions in the brain with frontotemporal lobar degeneration with motor neuron disease: TDP-43-immunopositive inclusions co-localize with p62, but not ubiquitin. Acta Neuropathol. 2008;116(2):183–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Nakano T, Nakaso K, Ohama E, et al. Expression of ubiquitin-binding protein p62 in ubiquitin-immunoreactive intraneuronal inclusions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with dementia: analysis of five autopsy cases with broad clinicopathological spectrum. Acta Neuropathol. 2004;107(4):359–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Mizuno Y, Amari M, Takatama M, et al. Immunoreactivities of p62, an ubiqutin-binding protein, in the spinal anterior horn cells of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2006;249(1):13–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Gazzina S, Manes MA, Padovani A, et al. Clinical and biological phenotypes of frontotemporal dementia: perspectives for disease modifying therapies. Eur J Pharmacol. 2017;817:76–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Petrov D, Mansfield C, Moussy A, et al. ALS clinical trials review: 20 years of failure. are we any closer to registering a new treatment? Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Mead RJ, Shan N, Reiser HJ, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a neurodegenerative disorder poised for successful therapeutic translation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023;22(3):185–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Van Damme P, Al‐Chalabi A, Andersen PM, et al. European Academy of Neurology (EAN) guideline on the management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in collaboration with European Reference Network for Neuromuscular Diseases (ERN EURO-NMD). Eur J Neurol. 2024;31(6):e16264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Miller TM, Cudkowicz ME, Genge A, et al. Trial of antisense oligonucleotide tofersen for SOD1 ALS. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(12):1099–1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Hobin F, De Vocht J, Lamaire N, et al. Specialized multidisciplinary care improves ALS survival in Belgium: a population-based retrospective study. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2024;25(3–4):282–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Dorst J, Ludolph AC, Huebers A. Disease-modifying and symptomatic treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2018;11:1756285617734734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Wyss-Coray T. Ageing, neurodegeneration and brain rejuvenation. Nature. 2016;539(7628):180–186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Soto C, Pritzkow S. Protein misfolding, aggregation, and conformational strains in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21(10):1332–1340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Kurtishi A, Rosen B, Patil KS, et al. Cellular Proteostasis in Neurodegeneration. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56(5):3676–3689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Kinger S, Jagtap YA, Kumar P, et al. Proteostasis in neurodegenerative diseases. Adv Clin Chem. 2024;121:270–333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Meng T, Lin S, Zhuang H, et al. Recent progress in the role of autophagy in neurological diseases. Cell Stress. 2019;3(5):141–161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Menzies FM, Fleming A, Rubinsztein DC. Compromised autophagy and neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16(6):345–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Laplante M, Sabatini D. Sabatini, mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell. 2012;149(2):274–293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Hipp MS, Park S-H, Hartl FU. Proteostasis impairment in protein-misfolding and -aggregation diseases. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24(9):506–514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Deretic V, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy and inflammation: a special review issue. Autophagy. 2018;14(2):179–180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Boland B, Yu WH, Corti O, et al. Promoting the clearance of neurotoxic proteins in neurodegenerative disorders of ageing. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17(9):660–688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Menzies FM, Fleming A, Caricasole A, et al. Autophagy and neurodegeneration: pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Neuron. 2017;93(5):1015–1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Hou Y, Dan X, Babbar M, et al. Ageing as a risk factor for neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(10):565–581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Azam S, Haque ME, Balakrishnan R, et al. The ageing brain: molecular and cellular basis of neurodegeneration. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:683459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Pandya VA, Patani R. Decoding the relationship between ageing and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a cellular perspective. Brain. 2019. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Corti O, Blomgren K, Poletti A, et al. Autophagy in neurodegeneration: new insights underpinning therapy for neurological diseases. J Neurochem. 2020;154(4):354–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Bingol B. Autophagy and lysosomal pathways in nervous system disorders. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2018;91:167–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Metaxakis A, Ploumi C, Tavernarakis N. Autophagy in age-associated neurodegeneration. Cells. 2018;7(5):37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].David DC. Aging and the aggregating proteome. Front Genet. 2012;3:247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Hergesheimer RC, Chami AA, de Assis DR, et al. The debated toxic role of aggregated TDP-43 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a resolution in sight? Brain. 2019;142(5):1176–1194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Park Y, Park J, Ki Y. Crosstalk between translation and the aggresome – autophagy pathway. Autophagy. 2018;14(6):1079–1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Lamark T, Johansen T. Aggrephagy: selective disposal of protein aggregates by macroautophagy. Int J Cell Biol. 2012;2012:1–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Carey JL, Guo L. Liquid-liquid phase separation of TDP-43 and FUS in physiology and pathology of neurodegenerative diseases. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;9:826719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Baradaran-Heravi Y, Van Broeckhoven C, van der Zee J. Stress granule mediated protein aggregation and underlying gene defects in the FTD-ALS spectrum. Neurobiol Dis. 2020;134:104639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Wolozin B, Ivanov P. Stress granules and neurodegeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019;20:649–666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Madabhushi R, Pan L, Tsai LH. DNA damage and its links to neurodegeneration. Neuron. 2014;83:266–282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Dadon-Nachum M, Melamed E, Offen D. The “dying-back” phenomenon of motor neurons in ALS. J Mol Neurosci. 2011;43(3):470–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Coleman MP. Axon biology in ALS: mechanisms of axon degeneration and prospects for therapy. Neurotherapeutics. 2022;19(4):1133–1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Stavoe AKH, Holzbaur ELF. Axonal autophagy: mini-review for autophagy in the CNS. Neurosci Lett. 2019;697:17–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Stavoe AKH, Holzbaur ELF. Autophagy in Neurons. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2019;35(1):477–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Valencia M, Kim SR, Jang Y, et al. Neuronal autophagy: characteristic features and roles in neuronal pathophysiology. Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2021;29(6):605–614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Lienard C, Pintart A, Bomont P. Neuronal autophagy: regulations and implications in health and disease. Cells. 2024;13(1):103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Kulkarni A, Chen J, Maday S. Neuronal autophagy and intercellular regulation of homeostasis in the brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018;51:29–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Maday S. Mechanisms of neuronal homeostasis: autophagy in the axon. Brain Res. 2016;1649:143–150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Hara T, Nakamura K, Matsui M, et al. Suppression of basal autophagy in neural cells causes neurodegenerative disease in mice. Nature. 2006;441(7095):885–889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Komatsu M, Waguri S, Chiba T, et al. Loss of autophagy in the central nervous system causes neurodegeneration in mice. Nature. 2006;441(7095):880–884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Liang -C-C, Wang C, Peng X, et al. Neural-specific deletion of FIP200 leads to cerebellar degeneration caused by increased neuronal death and axon degeneration. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(5):3499–3509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, et al. Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature. 2008;451(7182):1069–1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Bento CF, Renna M, Ghislat G, et al. Mammalian autophagy: how does it work? Annu Rev Biochem. 2016;85(1):685–713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Beckers J, Tharkeshwar AK, Van Damme P. C9orf72 ALS-FTD: recent evidence for dysregulation of the autophagy-lysosome pathway at multiple levels pathway at multiple levels. Autophagy. 2021;17(11):3306–3322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Todd TW, Shao W, J. Zhang Y, et al. The endolysosomal pathway and ALS/FTD. Trends Neurosci. 2023:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2023.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Chua JP, De Calbiac H, Kabashi E, et al. Autophagy and ALS: mechanistic insights and therapeutic implications. Autophagy. 2022;18(2):254–282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Yu L, Chen Y, Tooze SA. Autophagy pathway: cellular and molecular mechanisms. Autophagy. 2018;14(2):207–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Lamb CA, Yoshimori T, Tooze SA. The autophagosome: origins unknown, biogenesis complex. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14(12):759–774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Shang L, Chen S, Du F, et al. Nutrient starvation elicits an acute autophagic response mediated by Ulk1 dephosphorylation and its subsequent dissociation from AMPK. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(12):4788–4793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Zachari M, Ganley IG, Lane JD. The mammalian ULK1 complex and autophagy initiation. Essays Biochem. 2017;61(6):585–596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Russell RC, Tian Y, Yuan H, et al. ULK1 induces autophagy by phosphorylating Beclin-1 and activating VPS34 lipid kinase. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15(7):741–750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Park JM, Jung CH, Seo M, et al. The ULK1 complex mediates MTORC1 signaling to the autophagy initiation machinery via binding and phosphorylating ATG14. Autophagy. 2016;12(3):547–564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Rubinsztein DC, Shpilka T, Elazar Z. Mechanisms of autophagosome biogenesis. Curr Biol. 2012;22(1):R29–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Zhao YG, Codogno P, Zhang H. Machinery, regulation and pathophysiological implications of autophagosome maturation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(11):733–750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Walker SA, Ktistakis NT. Autophagosome biogenesis machinery. J Mol Biol. 2020;432(8):2449–2461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Mizushima N, Komatsu M. Autophagy: renovation of cells and tissues. Cell. 2011;147(4):728–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Deng Z, Purtell K, Lachance V, et al. Autophagy receptors and neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Cell Biol. 2017;27(7):491–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Vicencio E, Beltrán S, Labrador L, et al. Implications of selective autophagy dysfunction for ALS pathology. Cells. 2020;9(2):381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Johansen T, Lamark T. Selective autophagy mediated by autophagic adapter proteins. Autophagy. 2011;7(3):279–296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Stolz A, Ernst A, Dikic I. Cargo recognition and trafficking in selective autophagy. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16(6):495–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Lorincz P, Juhasz G. Autophagosome-lysosome fusion. J Mol Biol. 2020;432(8):2462–2482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Ke PY. Molecular mechanism of autophagosome-lysosome fusion in mammalian cells. Cells. 2024;13(6):500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Chen H, Gong S, Zhang H, et al. From the regulatory mechanism of TFEB to its therapeutic implications. Cell Death Discov. 2024;10(1):84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Tan A, Prasad R, Lee C, et al. Past, present, and future perspectives of transcription factor EB (TFEB): mechanisms of regulation and association with disease. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29(8):1433–1449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Takla M, Keshri S, Rubinsztein DC. The post-translational regulation of transcription factor EB (TFEB) in health and disease. EMBO Rep. 2023;24(11):e57574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Mahapatra KK, Mishra SR, Behera BP, et al. The lysosome as an imperative regulator of autophagy and cell death. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78(23):7435–7449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].Winckler B, Faundez V, Maday S, et al. The endolysosomal system and proteostasis: from development to degeneration. J Neurosci. 2018;38(44):9364–9374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [90].Giovedì S, Ravanelli MM, Parisi B, et al. Dysfunctional autophagy and endolysosomal system in neurodegenerative diseases: relevance and therapeutic options. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.602116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [91].Scott CC, Vacca F, Gruenberg J. Endosome maturation, transport and functions. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014;31:2–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Zhang J, Jiang Z, Shi A. Rab GTPases: the principal players in crafting the regulatory landscape of endosomal trafficking. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022;20:4464–4472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Bonifacino JS, Rojas R. Retrograde transport from endosomes to the trans-Golgi network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(8):568–579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [94].Keating SS, San Gil R, Swanson MEV, et al. TDP-43 pathology: from noxious assembly to therapeutic removal. Prog Neurobiol. 2022;211:102229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [95].Chen HJ, Mitchell JC. Mechanisms of tdp-43 proteinopathy onset and propagation. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [96].Nilaver BI, Urbanski HF. Mechanisms underlying TDP-43 pathology and neurodegeneration: an updated mini-review. Front Aging Neurosci. 2023;15:1142617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [97].Wallings RL, Humble SW, Ward ME, et al. Lysosomal dysfunction at the centre of parkinson’s disease and frontotemporal dementia/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Trends Neurosci. 2019;42(12):899–912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [98].Root J, Merino P, Nuckols A, et al. Lysosome dysfunction as a cause of neurodegenerative diseases: lessons from frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Dis. 2021;154:105360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [99].Bain HDC, Davidson YS, Robinson AC, et al. The role of lysosomes and autophagosomes in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2019:244–261. doi: 10.1111/nan.12500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [100].Leibiger C, Deisel J, Aufschnaiter A, et al. TDP-43 controls lysosomal pathways thereby determining its own clearance and cytotoxicity. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27(9):1593–1607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [101].Leibiger C, Deisel J, Aufschnaiter A, et al. Endolysosomal pathway activity protects cells from neurotoxic TDP-43. Microb Cell. 2018;27:1593–1607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [102].Liu G, Coyne AN, Pei F, et al. Endocytosis regulates TDP-43 toxicity and turnover. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):2092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [103].Byrd A, Marmorale L, Addison V, et al. Rsp5/NEDD4 and ESCRT regulate TDP-43 toxicity and turnover via an endolysosomal clearance mechanism. bioRxiv. 2022. doi: 10.1101/2022.12.05.519172. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [104].Brady OA, Meng P, Zheng Y, et al. Regulation of TDP-43 aggregation by phosphorylation andp62/SQSTM1. J Neurochem. 2011;116(2):248–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [105].Caccamo A, Majumder S, Deng JJ, et al. Rapamycin rescues TDP-43 mislocalization and the associated low molecular mass neurofilament instability. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(40):27416–27424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [106].Shao W, Todd TW, Wu Y, et al. Two FTD-ALS genes converge on the endosomal pathway to induce TDP-43 pathology and degeneration. Science. 2022;99(6615):94–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [107].Gallo JM, Edbauer D. A perturbed network in neurodegeneration. Science. 2022;378(6615):28–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [108].Hao J, Wells MF, Niu G, et al. Loss of TBK1 activity leads to TDP-43 proteinopathy through lysosomal dysfunction in human motor neurons. bioRxiv. 2021;10.11.464011. [Google Scholar]
- [109].Sasaki S. Autophagy in spinal cord motor neurons in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011;70(5):349–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [110].Mitra J, Hegde PM, Hegde ML. Loss of endosomal recycling factor RAB11 coupled with complex regulation of MAPK/ERK/AKT signaling in postmortem spinal cord specimens of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Mol Brain. 2019;12(1):55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [111].Perez-Torres EJ, Utkina-Sosunova I, Mishra V, et al. Retromer dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(26):e2118755119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [112].Chow CY, Landers JE, Bergren SK, et al. Deleterious variants of FIG4, a phosphoinositide phosphatase, in patients with ALS. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84(1):85–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [113].Palmisano R, Golfi P, Heimann P, et al. Endosomal accumulation of APP in wobbler motor neurons reflects impaired vesicle trafficking: implications for human motor neuron disease. BMC Neurosci. 2011;12(1):24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [114].Clayton EL, Mizielinska S, Edgar JR, et al. Frontotemporal dementia caused by CHMP2B mutation is characterised by neuronal lysosomal storage pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2015;130(4):511–523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [115].Chang A, Xiang X, Wang J, et al. Homotypic fibrillization of TMEM106B across diverse neurodegenerative diseases. Cell. 2022;185(8):1346–1355e1315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [116].Jiang YX, Cao Q, Sawaya MR, et al. Amyloid fibrils in FTLD-TDP are composed of TMEM106B and not TDP-43. Nature. 2022;605(7909):304–309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [117].Jiao HS, Yuan P, Yu JT. TMEM106B aggregation in neurodegenerative diseases: linking genetics to function. Mol Neurodegener. 2023;18(1):54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [118].Cozzi M, Ferrari V. Autophagy dysfunction in ALS: from transport to protein degradation. J Mol Neurosci. 2022. doi: 10.1007/s12031-022-02029-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [119].Sullivan PM, Zhou X, Robins AM, et al. The ALS/FTLD associated protein C9orf72 associates with SMCR8 and WDR41 to regulate the autophagy-lysosome pathway. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016;4(1):51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [120].Malik BR, Maddison DC, Smith GA, et al. Autophagic and endo-lysosomal dysfunction in neurodegenerative disease. Mol Brain. 2019;12(1):100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [121].Sreedharan J, Blair IP, Tripathi VB, et al. TDP-43 mutations in familial and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science. 2008;319(5870):1668–1672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [122].Rutherford NJ, Zhang Y-J, Baker M, et al. Novel mutations in TARDBP (TDP-43) in patients with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(9):e1000193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [123].Wild P, Farhan H, McEwan DG, et al. Phosphorylation of the autophagy receptor optineurin restricts salmonella growth. Science. 2011;333(6039):228–233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [124].Pilli M, Arko-Mensah J, Ponpuak M, et al. TBK-1 promotes autophagy-mediated antimicrobial defense by controlling autophagosome maturation. Immunity. 2012;37(2):223–234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [125].Richter B, Sliter DA, Herhaus L, et al., Phosphorylation of OPTN by TBK1 enhances its binding to Ub chains and promotes selective autophagy of damaged mitochondria. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A, 2016;113:4039–4044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [126].Matsumoto G, Shimogori T, Hattori N, et al. TBK1 controls autophagosomal engulfment of polyubiquitinated mitochondria through p62/SQSTM1 phosphorylation. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(15):4429–4442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [127].Heo JM, Ordureau A, Paulo JA, et al. The PINK1-PARKIN mitochondrial ubiquitylation pathway drives a program of OPTN/NDP52 recruitment and TBK1 activation to promote mitophagy. Mol Cell. 2015;60(1):7–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [128].Moore AS, Holzbaur ELF. Dynamic recruitment and activation of ALS-associated TBK1 with its target optineurin are required for efficient mitophagy. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A, 2016;113:E3349–E3358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [129].Li F, Xu D, Wang Y, et al. Structural insights into the ubiquitin recognition by OPTN (optineurin) and its regulation by TBK1-mediated phosphorylation. Autophagy. 2018;14(1):66–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [130].Freischmidt A, Wieland T, Richter B, et al. Haploinsufficiency of TBK1 causes familial ALS and fronto-temporal dementia. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(5):631–636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [131].Cirulli ET, Lasseigne BN, Petrovski S, et al. Exome sequencing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis identifies risk genes Exome sequencing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis identifies risk genes and pathways lateral sclerosis identifies risk genes and pathways. Science. 2015;347(6229):1436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [132].Gijselinck I, Van Mossevelde S, van der Zee J, et al. Loss of TBK1 is a frequent cause of frontotemporal dementia in a Belgian cohort. Neurology. 2015;85(24):2116–2125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [133].Oakes JA, Davies MC, Collins MO. TBK1: a new player in ALS linking autophagy and neuroinflammation. Mol Brain. 2017;10(1):5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [134].Gerbino V, Kaunga E, Ye J, et al. The loss of TBK1 kinase activity in motor neurons or in all cell types differentially impacts ALS disease progression in SOD1 mice. Neuron. 2020;106(5):789–805e785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [135].Brenner D, Sieverding K, Bruno C, et al. Heterozygous Tbk1 loss has opposing effects in early and late stages of ALS in mice. J Exp Med. 2019;216(2):267–278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [136].Harding O, Evans CS, Ye J, et al. ALS- and FTD-associated missense mutations in TBK1 differentially disrupt mitophagy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(24). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [137].Brenner D, Sieverding K, Srinidhi J, et al. A TBK1 variant causes autophagolysosomal and motoneuron pathology without neuroinflammation in mice. J Exp Med. 2024;221(5). doi: 10.1084/jem.20221190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [138].Sellier C, Campanari M-L, Julie Corbier C, et al. Loss of C9 ORF 72 impairs autophagy and synergizes with polyQ Ataxin-2 to induce motor neuron dysfunction and cell death. EMBO J. 2016;35(12):1276–1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [139].Ritter JL, Zhu Z, Thai TC, et al. Phosphorylation of RAB7 by TBK1/IKKepsilon regulates innate immune signaling in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2020;80(1):44–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [140].Heo JM, Ordureau A, Swarup S, et al. RAB7A phosphorylation by TBK1 promotes mitophagy via the PINK-PARKIN pathway. Sci Adv. 2018;4(11):1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [141].Zhang Y, Varela L, Szigeti-Buck K, et al. Cerebellar Kv3.3 potassium channels activate TANK-binding kinase 1 to regulate trafficking of the cell survival protein Hax-1. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [142].Eapen VV, Swarup S, Hoyer MJ, et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals the selectivity of ubiquitin-binding autophagy receptors in the turnover of damaged lysosomes by lysophagy. Elife. 2021;10. doi: 10.7554/eLife.72328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [143].Fraser J, Simpson J, Fontana R, et al. Targeting of early endosomes by autophagy facilitates EGFR recycling and signalling. EMBO Rep. 2019;20(10):e47734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [144].Kakizuka A. Roles of VCP in human neurodegenerative disorders. Biochem Soc Trans. 2008;36(1):105–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [145].Meyer H, Bug M, Bremer S. Emerging functions of the VCP/p97 AAA-ATPase in the ubiquitin system. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14(2):117–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [146].Scarian E, Fiamingo G, Diamanti L, et al. The role of VCP mutations in the spectrum of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis — frontotemporal dementia. Front Neurol. 2022;13:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [147].Watts GD, Wymer J, Kovach MJ, et al. Inclusion body myopathy associated with paget disease of bone and frontotemporal dementia is caused by mutant valosin-containing protein. Nat Genet. 2004;36(4):377–381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [148].Gonzalez MA, Feely SM, Speziani F, et al. A novel mutation in VCP causes charcot-marie-tooth Type 2 disease. Brain. 2014;137(11):2897–2902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [149].Johnson JO, Mandrioli J, Benatar M, et al. Exome sequencing reveals VCP mutations as a cause of familial ALS. Neuron. 2010;68(5):857–864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [150].Pensato V, Magri S, Dalla Bella E, et al. Sorting rare ALS genetic variants by targeted re-sequencing panel in italian patients: OPTN, VCP, and SQSTM1 variants account for 3% of rare genetic forms. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [151].Nalbandian A, Llewellyn KJ, Kitazawa M, et al. The homozygote VCP(R(1)(5)(5)H/R(1)(5)(5)H) mouse model exhibits accelerated human VCP-associated disease pathology. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e46308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [152].Custer SK, Neumann M, Lu H, et al. Transgenic mice expressing mutant forms VCP/p97 recapitulate the full spectrum of IBMPFD including degeneration in muscle, brain and bone. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(9):1741–1755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [153].Ju JS, Fuentealba RA, Miller SE, et al. Valosin-containing protein (VCP) is required for autophagy and is disrupted in VCP disease. J Cell Biol. 2009;187(6):875–888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [154].Hall CE, Yao Z, Choi M, et al. Progressive motor neuron pathology and the role of astrocytes in a human stem cell model of VCP-related ALS. Cell Rep. 2017;19(9):1739–1749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [155].Tresse E, Salomons FA, Vesa J, et al. VCP/p97 is essential for maturation of ubiquitin-containing autophagosomes and this function is impaired by mutations that cause IBMPFD. Autophagy. 2010;6(2):217–227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [156].Ritz D, Vuk M, Kirchner P, et al. Endolysosomal sorting of ubiquitylated caveolin-1 is regulated by VCP and UBXD1 and impaired by VCP disease mutations. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13(9):1116–1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [157].Ramanathan HN, Ye Y. The p97 ATPase associates with EEA1 to regulate the size of early endosomes. Cell Res. 2012;22(2):346–359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [158].Pleasure IT, Black MM, Keen JH. Valosin-containing protein, VCP, is a ubiquitous clathrin-binding protein. Nature. 1993;365(6445):459–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [159].Buchan JR, Kolaitis RM, Taylor JP, et al. Eukaryotic stress granules are cleared by autophagy and Cdc48/VCP function. Cell. 2013;153(7):1461–1474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [160].Papadopoulos C, Kirchner P, Bug M, et al. VCP /p97 cooperates with YOD 1, UBXD 1 and PLAA to drive clearance of ruptured lysosomes by autophagy. EMBO J. 2017;36(2):135–150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [161].Kim NC, Tresse E, Kolaitis R-M, et al. VCP is essential for mitochondrial quality control by PINK1/parkin and this function is impaired by VCP mutations. Neuron. 2013;78(1):65–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [162].Hill SM, Wrobel L, Ashkenazi A, et al. VCP/p97 regulates Beclin-1-dependent autophagy initiation. Nat Chem Biol. 2021;17(4):448–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [163].Hung C, Patani R. Elevated 4R tau contributes to endolysosomal dysfunction and neurodegeneration in VCP-related frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2023. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [164].Keller BA, Volkening K, Droppelmann CA, et al. Co-aggregation of RNA binding proteins in ALS spinal motor neurons: evidence of a common pathogenic mechanism. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;124(5):733–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [165].Rudnick ND, Griffey CJ, Guarnieri P, et al. Distinct roles for motor neuron autophagy early and late in the SOD1G93A mouse model of ALS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(39):E8294–E8303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [166].Davidson JM, Chung RS, Lee A. The converging roles of sequestosome-1/p62 in the molecular pathways of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Neurobiol Dis. 2022;166:105653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [167].Sanchez-Martin P, Komatsu M. p62/SQSTM1 - steering the cell through health and disease. J Cell Sci. 2018;131(21). doi: 10.1242/jcs.222836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [168].Pankiv S, Clausen TH, Lamark T, et al. p62/SQSTM1 binds directly to Atg8/LC3 to facilitate degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates by autophagy. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(33):24131–24145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [169].Klionsky D, Abdelmohsen K, Abe A, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy. Autophagy. 2016;8:445–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [170].Chitiprolu M, Jagow C, Tremblay V, et al. A complex of C9ORF72 and p62 uses arginine methylation to eliminate stress granules by autophagy. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [171].Geisler S, Holmström KM, Skujat D, et al. PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy is dependent on VDAC1 and p62/SQSTM1. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12(2):119–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [172].Lim J, Lachenmayer ML, Wu S, et al. Proteotoxic stress induces phosphorylation of p62/SQSTM1 by ULK1 to regulate selective autophagic clearance of protein aggregates. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(2):e1004987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [173].Matsumoto G, Wada K, Okuno M, et al. Serine 403 phosphorylation of p62/SQSTM1 regulates selective autophagic clearance of ubiquitinated proteins. Mol Cell. 2011;44(2):279–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [174].Jain A, Lamark T, Sjøttem E, et al. p62/SQSTM1 is a target gene for transcription factor NRF2 and creates a positive feedback loop by inducing antioxidant response element-driven gene transcription. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(29):22576–22591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [175].Lee Y, Chou T-F, Pittman SK, et al. Keap1/Cullin3 modulates p62/SQSTM1 activity via UBA domain ubiquitination. Cell Rep. 2017;19(1):188–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [176].Peng H, Yang J, Li G, et al. Ubiquitylation of p62/sequestosome1 activates its autophagy receptor function and controls selective autophagy upon ubiquitin stress. Cell Res. 2017;27(5):657–674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [177].Teyssou E, Takeda T, Lebon V, et al. Mutations in SQSTM1 encoding p62 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: genetics and neuropathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;125(4):511–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [178].Fecto F, van Blitterswijk MM, Vlam L, et al. Mutations in familial and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 2011;68(11):1440–1446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [179].van der Zee J, Van Langenhove T, Kovacs GG, et al. Rare mutations in SQSTM1 modify susceptibility to frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;128(3):397–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [180].Rea SL, Majcher V, Searle MS, et al. SQSTM1 mutations–bridging paget disease of bone and ALS/FTLD. Exp Cell Res. 2014;325(1):27–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [181].Gang Q, Bettencourt C, Machado PM, et al. Rare variants in SQSTM1 and VCP genes and risk of sporadic inclusion body myositis. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;47:218e211–218e219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [182].Rubino E, Rainero I, Chiò A, et al. SQSTM1 mutations in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 2012;79(15):1556–1562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [183].Goode A, Rea S, Sultana M, et al. ALS-FTLD associated mutations of SQSTM1 impact on Keap1-Nrf2 signalling. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2016;76:52–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [184].Lattante S, de Calbiac H, Le Ber I, et al. Sqstm1 knock-down causes a locomotor phenotype ameliorated by rapamycin in a zebrafish model of ALS/FTLD. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(6):1682–1690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [185].Swinnen B, Bento-Abreu A, Gendron TF, et al. A zebrafish model for C9orf72 ALS reveals RNA toxicity as a pathogenic mechanism. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;135(3):427–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [186].Hadano S, Mitsui S, Pan L, et al. Functional links between SQSTM1 and ALS2 in the pathogenesis of ALS: cumulative impact on the protection against mutant SOD1-mediated motor dysfunction in mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(15):3321–3340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [187].Mitsui S, Otomo A, Nozaki M, et al. Systemic overexpression of SQSTM1/p62 accelerates disease onset in a SOD1H46R-expressing ALS mouse model. Mol Brain. 2018;11(1):1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [188].Rezaie T, Child A, Hitchings R, et al. Adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma caused by mutations in optineurin. Science. 2002;295(5557):1077–1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [189].Toth RP, Atkin JD. Dysfunction of optineurin in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and glaucoma. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [190].Pottier C, Bieniek KF, Finch N, et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals important role for TBK1 and OPTN mutations in frontotemporal lobar degeneration without motor neuron disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2015;130(1):77–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [191].Maruyama H, Morino H, Ito H, et al. Mutations of optineurin in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature. 2010;465(7295):223–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [192].Slowicka K, Vereecke L, van Loo G. Cellular functions of optineurin in health and disease. Trends Immunol. 2016;37(9):621–633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [193].Qiu Y, Wang J, Li H, et al. Emerging views of OPTN (optineurin) function in the autophagic process associated with disease. Autophagy. 2022;18(1):73–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [194].Wong YC, Holzbaur EL. Optineurin is an autophagy receptor for damaged mitochondria in parkin-mediated mitophagy that is disrupted by an ALS-linked mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(42):E4439–4448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [195].Padman BS, Nguyen TN, Uoselis L, et al. LC3/GABARAPs drive ubiquitin-independent recruitment of Optineurin and NDP52 to amplify mitophagy. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [196].Korac J, Schaeffer V, Kovacevic I, et al. Ubiquitin-independent function of optineurin in autophagic clearance of protein aggregates. J Cell Sci. 2013;126(2):580–592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [197].Tumbarello DA, Waxse BJ, Arden SD, et al. Autophagy receptors link myosin VI to autophagosomes to mediate Tom1-dependent autophagosome maturation and fusion with the lysosome. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14(10):1024–1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [198].Sundaramoorthy V, Walker AK, Tan V, et al. Defects in optineurin- and myosin VI-mediated cellular trafficking in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(13):3830–3846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [199].Chalasani ML, Kumari A, Radha V, et al. E50K-OPTN-induced retinal cell death involves the Rab GTPase-activating protein, TBC1D17 mediated block in autophagy. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [200].Shen WC, Li HY, Chen GC, et al. Mutations in the ubiquitin-binding domain of OPTN/optineurin interfere with autophagy- mediated degradation of misfolded proteins by a dominant-negative mechanism. Autophagy. 2015;11(4):685–700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [201].Blokhuis AM, Koppers M, Groen EJN, et al. Comparative interactomics analysis of different ALS-associated proteins identifies converging molecular pathways. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;132(2):175–196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [202].Deng HX, Chen W, Hong S-T, et al. Mutations in UBQLN2 cause dominant X-linked juvenile and adult-onset ALS and ALS/dementia. Nature. 2011;477(7363):211–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [203].Renaud L, Picher-martel V, Codron P, et al. Key role of UBQLN2 in pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019;7(1):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [204].Ko HS, Uehara T, Tsuruma K, et al. Ubiquilin interacts with ubiquitylated proteins and proteasome through its ubiquitin-associated and ubiquitin-like domains. FEBS Lett. 2004;566(1–3):110–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [205].Hjerpe R, Bett JS, Keuss MJ, et al. UBQLN2 mediates autophagy-independent protein aggregate clearance by the proteasome. Cell. 2016;166(4):935–949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [206].Idera A, Sharkey LM, Kurauchi Y, et al. Wild-type and pathogenic forms of ubiquilin 2 differentially modulate components of the autophagy-lysosome pathways. J Pharmacol Sci. 2023;152(3):182–192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [207].Fecto F, Esengul YT, Deng H-X, et al. Autophagy Is Impaired by UBQLN2 mutations linked to ALS/FTD (P05.164). Neurology. 2012;78(1):105–164. [Google Scholar]
- [208].N’Diaye EN, Kajihara KK, Hsieh I, et al. PLIC proteins or ubiquilins regulate autophagy-dependent cell survival during nutrient starvation. EMBO Rep. 2009;10(2):173–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [209].Rothenberg C, Srinivasan D, Mah L, et al. Ubiquilin functions in autophagy and is degraded by chaperone-mediated autophagy. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(16):3219–3232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [210].Osaka M, Ito D, Yagi T, et al. Evidence of a link between ubiquilin 2 and optineurin in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(6):1617–1629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [211].Şentürk M, Lin G, Zuo Z, et al. Ubiquilins regulate autophagic flux through mTOR signalling and lysosomal acidification. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21(3):384–396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [212].Wu JJ, Cai A, Greenslade JE, et al. ALS/FTD mutations in UBQLN2 impede autophagy by reducing autophagosome acidification through loss of function. PNAS. 2020. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917371117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [213].Dillen L, Van Langenhove T, Engelborghs S, et al. Explorative genetic study of UBQLN2 and PFN1 in an extended flanders-belgian cohort of frontotemporal lobar degeneration patients. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34(6):1711e1711–1711e1715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [214].Daoud H, Suhail H, Szuto A, et al. UBQLN2 mutations are rare in French and French-Canadian amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(9):2230e2231–2230e2235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [215].Picher-Martel V, Dutta K, Phaneuf D, et al. Ubiquilin-2 drives NF-κB activity and cytosolic TDP-43 aggregation in neuronal cells. Mol Brain. 2015;8(1). doi: 10.1186/s13041-015-0162-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [216].Cassel JA, Reitz AB. Ubiquilin-2 (UBQLN2) binds with high affinity to the C-terminal region of TDP-43 and modulates TDP-43 levels in H4 cells: characterization of inhibition by nucleic acids and 4-aminoquinolines. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1834(6):964–971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [217].Chen T, Huang B, Shi X, et al. Mutant UBQLN2 P497H in motor neurons leads to ALS-like phenotypes and defective autophagy in rats. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2018;6(1):122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [218].Kim SH, Nichols KD, Anderson EN, et al. Axon guidance genes modulate neurotoxicity of ALS-associated UBQLN2. Elife. 2023;12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [219].Whiteley AM, Prado MA, de Poot SAH, et al. Global proteomics of Ubqln2-based murine models of ALS. J Biol Chem. 2021;296:100153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [220].Wu Q, Liu M, Huang C, et al. Pathogenic Ubqln2 gains toxic properties to induce neuron death. Acta Neuropathol. 2015;129(3):417–428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [221].Ceballos-Diaz C, Rosario AM, Park H-J, et al. Viral expression of ALS-linked ubiquilin-2 mutants causes inclusion pathology and behavioral deficits in mice. Mol Neurodegener. 2015;10(1):25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [222].Huang B, Wu Q, Zhou H, et al. Increased Ubqln2 expression causes neuron death in transgenic rats. J Neurochem. 2016;139(2):285–293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [223].Le NT, Chang L, Kovlyagina I, et al. Motor neuron disease, TDP-43 pathology, and memory deficits in mice expressing ALS–FTD-linked UBQLN2 mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(47):E7580–E7589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [224].Sharkey LM, Sandoval-Pistorius SS, Moore SJ, et al. Modeling UBQLN2-mediated neurodegenerative disease in mice: shared and divergent properties of wild type and mutant UBQLN2 in phase separation, subcellular localization, altered proteostasis pathways, and selective cytotoxicity. Neurobiol Dis. 2020;143:105016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [225].Safren N, Dao TP, Mohan HM, et al. Pathogenic mutations in UBQLN2 exhibit diverse aggregation propensity and neurotoxicity. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):6049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [226].Picher-Martel V, Renaud L, Bareil C, et al. Neuronal expression of UBQLN2 P497H exacerbates TDP-43 pathology in TDP-43 G348C mice through Interaction with ubiquitin. Mol Neurobiol. 2018:4680–4696. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1411-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [227].Masrori P, Bijnens B, Davie K, et al. Hexanucleotide repeat expansions in C9orf72 alter microglial responses and prevent a coordinated glial reaction in ALS. bioRxiv. 2022;10.26.513909. doi: 10.1101/2022.10.26.513909. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [228].Rizzu P, Blauwendraat C, Heetveld S, et al. C9orf72 is differentially expressed in the central nervous system and myeloid cells and consistently reduced in C9orf72, MAPT and GRN mutation carriers. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016;4(1):37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [229].Atanasio A, Decman V, White D, et al. C9orf72 ablation causes immune dysregulation characterized by leukocyte expansion, autoantibody production, and glomerulonephropathy in mice. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):23204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [230].O’Rourke JG, Bogdanik L, Yáñez A, et al. C9orf72 is required for proper macrophage and microglial function in mice. Science. 2016;351(6279):1324–1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [231].Burberry A, Suzuki N, Wang J-Y, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the C9ORF72 mouse ortholog cause fatal autoimmune disease. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(347):347ra393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [232].Atkinson RAK, Fernandez-Martos CM, Atkin JD, et al. C9ORF72 expression and cellular localization over mouse development. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2015;3(1):59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [233].Aoki Y, Manzano R, Lee Y, et al. C9orf72 and RAB7L1 regulate vesicle trafficking in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2017;140(4):887–897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [234].Laflamme C, McKeever PM, Kumar R, et al. Implementation of an antibody validation procedure: application to the major ALS/FTD disease gene C9ORF72. eLife. 2019:499350. doi: 10.1101/499350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [235].Shi Y, Lin S, Staats KA, et al. Haploinsufficiency leads to neurodegeneration in C9ORF72 ALS/FTD human induced motor neurons. Nat Med. 2018;24(3):313–325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [236].Xiao S, McKeever PM, Lau A, et al. Synaptic localization of C9orf72 regulates post-synaptic glutamate receptor 1 levels. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019;7(1):161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [237].Amick J, Roczniak-Ferguson A, Ferguson SM. C9orf72 binds SMCR8, localizes to lysosomes, and regulates mTORC1 signaling. Mol Biol Cell. 2016;27(20):3040–3051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [238].Farg MA, Sundaramoorthy V, Sultana JM, et al. C9ORF72, implicated in amytrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia, regulates endosomal trafficking. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(13):3579–3595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [239].Wang M, Wang H, Tao Z, et al. C9orf72 associates with inactive rag GTPases and regulates mTORC1-mediated autophagosomal and lysosomal biogenesis. Aging Cell. 2020;19(4):e13126–e13126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [240].Amick J, Tharkeshwar AK, Talaia G, et al. PQLC2 signals lysosomal cationic amino acid abundance to the C9orf72 complex. J Cell Biol. 2019;219:670034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [241].Frick P, Sellier C, Mackenzie IRA, et al. Novel antibodies reveal presynaptic localization of C9orf72 protein and reduced protein levels in C9orf72 mutation carriers. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2018;6(1):72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [242].Xiao S, MacNair L, McGoldrick P, et al. Isoform-specific antibodies reveal distinct subcellular localizations of C 9orf72 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2015;78(4):568–583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [243].Tang D, Sheng J, Xu L, et al. The C9orf72-SMCR8-WDR41 complex is a GAP for small GTPases. Autophagy. 2020;16(8):1542–1543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [244].Su M-Y, Hurley J, Hurley J. Structure of the C9orf72 ARF GAP complex that is haploinsufficient in ALS and FTD. Nature. 2020;585(7824):251–255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [245].Diab R, Pilotto F, Saxena S. Autophagy and neurodegeneration: unraveling the role of C9ORF72 in the regulation of autophagy and its relationship to ALS-FTD pathology. Front Cell Neurosci. 2023:1–19. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1086895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [246].Webster CP, Smith EF, Grierson AJ, et al. C9orf72 plays a central role in rab GTPase-dependent regulation of autophagy. Small GTPases. 2018;9(5):399–408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [247].Yang M, Liang C, Swaminathan K, et al. A C9ORF72/SMCR8-containing complex regulates ULK1 and plays a dual role in autophagy. Sci Adv. 2016;2(9):e1601167–e1601167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [248].DeJesus-Hernandez M, Mackenzie I, Boeve B, et al. Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron. 2011;72(2):245–256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [249].Renton AE, Majounie E, Waite A, et al. A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD. Neuron. 2011;72(2):257–268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [250].Gijselinck I, Van Mossevelde S, van der Zee J, et al. The C9orf72 repeat size correlates with onset age of disease, DNA methylation and transcriptional downregulation of the promoter. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21(8):1112–1124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [251].Dols-Icardo O, Garcia-Redondo A, Rojas-Garcia R, et al. Characterization of the repeat expansion size in C9orf72 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(3):749–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [252].Haeusler AR, Donnelly CJ, Rothstein JD. The expanding biology of the C9orf72 nucleotide repeat expansion in neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016;12(6):383–395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [253].Balendra R, Isaacs AM. C9orf72-mediated ALS and FTD: multiple pathways to disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(9):544–558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [254].Haeusler AR, Donnelly CJ, Periz G, et al. C9orf72 nucleotide repeat structures initiate molecular cascades of disease. Nature. 2014;507(7491):195–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [255].Cunningham KM, Maulding K, Ruan K, et al. TFEB/Mitf links impaired nuclear import to autophagolysosomal dysfunction in C9-ALS. Elife. 2020;9. doi: 10.7554/eLife.59419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [256].Ma L, Liang C, Wang J, et al. Reversing lysosome-ribosome circuit dysregulation mitigates C9FTD/ALS neurodegeneration and behaviors. Hum Mol Genet. 2023;32(8):1252–1265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [257].Steffke C, Agarwal S, Kabashi E, et al. Overexpression of toxic poly(glycine-alanine) aggregates in primary neuronal cultures induces time-dependent autophagic and synaptic alterations but subtle activity impairments. Cells. 2024;13(15):1300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [258].Beckers J, Tharkeshwar AK, Fumagalli L, et al. A toxic gain-of-function mechanism in C9orf72 ALS impairs the autophagy-lysosome pathway in neurons. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2023;11(1):151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [259].Bozič J, Motaln H, Janež AP, et al. Interactome screening of C9orf72 dipeptide repeats reveals VCP sequestration and functional impairment by polyGA. Brain. 2022;145(2):684–699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [260].Webster CP, Smith EF, Bauer CS, et al. The C9orf72 protein interacts with Rab1a and the ULK 1 complex to regulate initiation of autophagy. EMBO J. 2016;35(15):1656–1676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [261].Almeida S, Gascon E, Tran H, et al. Modeling key pathological features of frontotemporal dementia with C9ORF72 repeat expansion in iPSC-derived human neurons. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126(3):385–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [262].Selvaraj BT, Livesey MR, Zhao C, et al. C9ORF72 repeat expansion causes vulnerability of motor neurons to Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptor-mediated excitotoxicity. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [263].Yang M, Liang C, Swaminathan K, et al. A C9ORF72/SMCR8-containing complex regulates ULK1 and plays a dual role in autophagy, 2016. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- [264].Ugolino J, Ji YJ, Conchina K, et al. Loss of C9orf72 enhances autophagic activity via deregulated mTOR and TFEB signaling. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(11):e1006443–e1006443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [265].Amick J, Tharkeshwar AK, Talaia G, et al. PQLC2 recruits the C9orf72 complex to lysosomes in response to cationic amino acid starvation. J Cell Biol. 2020;219(1). doi: 10.1083/jcb.201906076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [266].Ao X, Zou L, Wu Y. Regulation of autophagy by the R ab GTPase network. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21(3):348–358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [267].Shao Q, Liang C, Chang Q, et al. C9orf72 deficiency promotes motor deficits of a C9ALS/FTD mouse model in a dose- dependent manner. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019;7(1):9–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [268].Zhu Q, Jiang J, Gendron TF, et al. Reduced C9ORF72 function exacerbates gain of toxicity from ALS/FTD-causing repeat expansion in C9orf72. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23(5):615–624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [269].Vahsen BF, Nalluru S, Morgan GR, et al. C9orf72-ALS human iPSC microglia are pro-inflammatory and toxic to co-cultured motor neurons via MMP9. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):5898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [270].Banerjee P, et al. Cell-autonomous immune dysfunction driven by disrupted autophagy in C9orf72 -ALS iPSC-derived microglia contributes to neurodegeneration. Sci Adv. 2023. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq0651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [271].Hadano S, Hand CK, Osuga H, et al. A gene encoding a putative GTPase regulator is mutated in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 2. Nat Genet. 2001;29(2):166–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [272].Yang Y, Hentati A, Deng H-X, et al. The gene encoding alsin, a protein with three guanine-nucleotide exchange factor domains, is mutated in a form of recessive amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Genet. 2001;29(2):160–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [273].Otomo A, Hadano S, Okada T, et al. ALS2, a novel guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the small GTPase Rab5, is implicated in endosomal dynamics. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12(14):1671–1687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [274].Topp JD, Gray NW, Gerard RD, et al. Alsin is a Rab5 and Rac1 guanine nucleotide exchange factor. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(23):24612–24623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [275].Kunita R, Otomo A, Mizumura H, et al. The Rab5 activator ALS2/alsin acts as a novel Rac1 effector through Rac1-activated endocytosis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(22):16599–16611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [276].Otomo A, Kunita R, Suzuki-Utsunomiya K, et al. Defective relocalization of ALS2/alsin missense mutants to Rac1-induced macropinosomes accounts for loss of their cellular function and leads to disturbed amphisome formation. FEBS Lett. 2011;585(5):730–736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [277].Hadano S, Otomo A, Kunita R, et al. Loss of ALS2/Alsin exacerbates motor dysfunction in a SOD1H46R-expres sing mouse ALS model by disturbing endolysosomal trafficking. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(3):e9805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [278].Lai C, Xie C, Shim H, et al. Regulation of endosomal motility and degradation by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 2/alsin. Mol Brain. 2009;2(1):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [279].Devon RS, Orban PC, Gerrow K, et al. Als2 -deficient mice exhibit disturbances in endosome trafficking associated with motor behavioral abnormalities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(25):9595–9600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [280].Hadano S, Benn SC, Kakuta S, et al. Mice deficient in the Rab5 guanine nucleotide exchange factor ALS2/alsin exhibit age-dependent neurological deficits and altered endosome trafficking. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15(2):233–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [281].Ono S, Otomo A, Murakoshi S, et al. ALS2, the small GTPase Rab17-interacting protein, regulates maturation and sorting of Rab17-associated endosomes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;523(4):908–915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [282].Tziortzouda P, Bosch LVD, Hirth F. Triad of TDP43 control in neurodegeneration: autoregulation, localization and aggregation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021;22(4):197–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [283].Scotter EL, Vance C, Nishimura AL, et al. Differential roles of the ubiquitin proteasome system and autophagy in the clearance of soluble and aggregated TDP-43 species. J Cell Sci. 2014;127(Pt 6):1263–1278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [284].Budini M, Buratti E, Morselli E, et al. Autophagy and its impact on neurodegenerative diseases: new roles for TDP-43 and C9orf72. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017;10:1–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [285].Ormeño F, Hormazabal J, Moreno J, et al. Chaperone mediated autophagy degrades TDP-43 protein and is affected by TDP-43 aggregation. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience. 2020;13:1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [286].Kumar S, Phaneuf D, Cordeau P, et al. Induction of autophagy mitigates TDP-43 pathology and translational repression of neurofilament mRNAs in mouse models of ALS/FTD. Mol Neurodegener. 2021;16(1):1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [287].Tejwani L, Jung Y, Kokubu H, et al. Reduction of Nemo-like kinase increases lysosome biogenesis and ameliorates TDP-43-related neurodegeneration. J Clin Investig. 2023:1–17. doi: 10.1172/jci138207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [288].Barmada SJ, Serio A, Arjun A, et al. Autophagy induction enhances TDP43 turnover and survival in neuronal ALS models. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10(8):677–685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [289].Chu Y-P, Jin L-W, Wang L-C, et al. Transthyretin attenuates TDP-43 proteinopathy by autophagy activation via ATF4 in FTLD-TDP. Brain. 2023;146(5):2089–2106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [290].Xia Q, Wang H, Hao Z, et al. TDP −43 loss of function increases TFEB activity and blocks autophagosome–lysosome fusion. EMBO J. 2016;35(2):121–142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [291].Ying Z, Xia Q, Hao Z, et al. TARDBP/TDP-43 regulates autophagy in both MTORC1-dependent and MTORC1-independent manners. Autophagy. 2016;12(4):707–708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [292].Bose JK, Huang CC, Shen CKJ. Regulation of autophagy by neuropathological protein TDP-43. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(52):44441–44448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [293].Sun L, Zhang K, Zhai W, et al. TAR DNA binding Protein-43 loss of function induced by phosphorylation at S409/410 blocks autophagic flux and participates in secondary brain injury after intracerebral hemorrhage. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [294].Torres P, Ramírez-Núñez O, Romero-Guevara R, et al. Cryptic exon splicing function of TARDBP interacts with autophagy in nervous tissue. Autophagy. 2018;14:1398–1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [295].Skoko N, Baralle M, Baralle FE. Absence of TDP −43 is difficult to digest. EMBO J. 2016;35(2):115–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [296].Schwenk BM, Hartmann H, Serdaroglu A, et al. TDP‐43 loss of function inhibits endosomal trafficking and alters trophic signaling in neurons. EMBO J. 2016;35(21):2350–2370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [297].Kwiatkowski TJ, Bosco DA, LeClerc AL, et al. Mutations in the FUS/TLS gene on chromosome 16 cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science. 2009;323(5918):1205–1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [298].Vance C, Rogelj B, Hortobágyi T, et al. Mutations in FUS, an RNA processing protein, cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 6. Science. 2009;323(5918):1208–1211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [299].Ling S-C, Polymenidou M, Cleveland DW. Converging mechanisms in ALS and FTD: disrupted RNA and protein homeostasis. Neuron. 2013;79(3):416–438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [300].Ryu HH, Jun M-H, Min K-J, et al. Autophagy regulates amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-linked fused in sarcoma-positive stress granules in neurons. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35(12):2822–2831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [301].Soo KY, Sultana J, King AE, et al. ALS-associated mutant FUS inhibits macroautophagy which is restored by overexpression of Rab1. Cell Death Discov. 2015;1(1):15030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [302].Marrone L, Poser I, Casci I, et al. Isogenic FUS-eGFP iPSC reporter lines enable quantification of FUS stress granule pathology that is rescued by drugs inducing autophagy. Stem Cell Reports. 2018;10(2):375–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [303].Arenas A, Kuang L, Zhang J, et al. FUS regulates autophagy by mediating the transcription of genes critical to the autophagosome formation. J Neurochem. 2021;157(3):752–763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [304].Ling S-C, Dastidar SG, Tokunaga S, et al. Overriding FUS autoregulation in mice triggers gain-of-toxic dysfunctions in RNA metabolism and autophagy-lysosome axis. eLife. 2019;8:1–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [305].Rosen DR, Siddique T, Patterson D, et al. Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature. 1993;362(6415):59–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [306].Kabuta T, Suzuki Y, Wada K. Degradation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-linked mutant Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase proteins by macroautophagy and the proteasome. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(41):30524–30533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [307].Li J, Huang KX, Le WD. Establishing a novel C. elegans model to investigate the role of autophagy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2013;34(5):644–650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [308].Sun J, Mu Y, Jiang Y, et al. Inhibition of p70 S6 kinase activity by A77 1726 induces autophagy and enhances the degradation of superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) protein aggregates. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(3):407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [309].Bi Y, Yan X, Yacipi N, et al. Pharmacological modulation of autophagy prevents mutant SOD1G93A induced neurotoxicity in experimental models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). bioRxiv. 2022. doi: 10.1101/2022.11.02.514252. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [310].Xu H, Jia C, Cheng C, et al. Activation of autophagy attenuates motor deficits and extends lifespan in a C. elegans model of ALS. Free Radic Biol Med. 2022;181:52–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [311].Wen D, Ji Y, Li Y, et al. OPTN gene therapy increases autophagy and protects mitochondria in SOD1 -G93A-expressing transgenic mice and cells. FEBS J. 2024;291(4):795–813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [312].Castillo K, Nassif M, Valenzuela V, et al. Trehalose delays the progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by enhancing autophagy in motoneurons. Autophagy. 2013;9(9):1308–1320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [313].Nassif M, Valenzuela V, Rojas-Rivera D, et al. Pathogenic role of BECN1/Beclin 1 in the development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Autophagy. 2014;10(7):1256–1271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [314].Perera ND, Sheean RK, Lau CL, et al. Rilmenidine promotes MTOR-independent autophagy in the mutant SOD1 mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis without slowing disease progression. Autophagy. 2018;14(3):534–551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [315].Ahn HJ. Neuroprotective effect of rapamycin (autophagy enhancer) in transgenic SOD1-G93A mice of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Clini Neurophysiol. 2013;15:53–58 [Google Scholar]
- [316].Chen Y, Liu H, Guan Y, et al., The altered autophagy mediated by TFEB in animal and cell models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am J Transl Res. 2015;7:1574–1587. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [317].Tak YJ, Park JH, Rhim H, et al. ALS-related mutant SOD1 aggregates interfere with mitophagy by sequestering the autophagy receptor optineurin. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(20):7525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [318].Morimoto N, Nagai M, Ohta Y, et al. Increased autophagy in transgenic mice with a G93A mutant SOD1 gene. Brain Res. 2007;1167:112–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [319].Bandyopadhyay U, Nagy M, Fenton WA, et al. Absence of lipofuscin in motor neurons of SOD1-linked ALS mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(30):11055–11060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [320].Hutchings AJ, Hambrecht B, Veh A, et al. Plekhg5 controls the unconventional secretion of Sod1 by presynaptic secretory autophagy. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):8622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [321].Luty AA, Kwok JBJ, Dobson‐Stone C, et al. Sigma nonopioid intracellular receptor 1 mutations cause frontotemporal lobar degeneration-motor neuron disease. Ann Neurol. 2010;68(5):639–649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [322].Al-Saif A, Al-Mohanna F, Bohlega S. A mutation in sigma-1 receptor causes juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2011;70(6):913–919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [323].Aishwarya R, Abdullah CS, Morshed M, et al. Sigmar1ʹs molecular, cellular, and biological functions in regulating cellular pathophysiology. Front Physiol. 2021;12:705575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [324].Christ MG, Clement AM, Behl C. The Sigma-1 receptor at the crossroad of proteostasis, neurodegeneration, and autophagy. Trends Neurosci. 2020;43(2):79–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [325].Christ MG, Huesmann H, Nagel H, et al. Sigma-1 receptor activation induces autophagy and increases proteostasis capacity in vitro and in vivo. Cells. 2019;8(3):211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [326].Vollrath JT, Sechi A, Dreser A, et al. Loss of function of the ALS protein SigR1 leads to ER pathology associated with defective autophagy and lipid raft disturbances. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5(6):e1290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [327].Yang H, Shen H, Li J, et al. SIGMAR1/Sigma-1 receptor ablation impairs autophagosome clearance. Autophagy. 2019;15(9):1539–1557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [328].Lin CY, Wu H-E, Weng EF-J, et al. Fluvoxamine exerts Sigma-1R to rescue autophagy via Pom121-Mediated nucleocytoplasmic transport of TFEB. Mol Neurobiol. 2024;61(8):5282–5294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [329].Coyne AN, Zaepfel BL, Hayes L, et al. G(4)C(2) repeat RNA Initiates a POM121-mediated reduction in specific nucleoporins in C9orf72 ALS/FTD. Neuron. 2020;107(6):1124–1140.e1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [330].Wang SM, Wu H-E, Yasui Y, et al. Nucleoporin POM121 signals TFEB-mediated autophagy via activation of SIGMAR1/sigma-1 receptor chaperone by pridopidine. Autophagy. 2023;19(1):126–151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [331].Chow CY, Zhang Y, Dowling JJ, et al. Mutation of FIG4 causes neurodegeneration in the pale tremor mouse and patients with CMT4J. Nature. 2007;448(7149):68–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [332].Osmanovic A, Rangnau I, Kosfeld A, et al. FIG4 variants in central European patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a whole-exome and targeted sequencing study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017;25(3):324–331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [333].Sbrissa D, Ikonomov OC, Fu Z, et al. Core protein machinery for mammalian phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate synthesis and turnover that regulates the progression of endosomal transport. Novel Sac phosphatase joins the ArPIKfyve-PIKfyve complex. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(33):23878–23891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [334].Ferguson CJ, Lenk GM, Meisler MH. Defective autophagy in neurons and astrocytes from mice deficient in PI(3,5)P2. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(24):4868–4878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [335].Rutherford AC, Traer C, Wassmer T, et al. The mammalian phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate 5-kinase (PIKfyve) regulates endosome-to-TGN retrograde transport. J Cell Sci. 2006;119(19):3944–3957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [336].Marat AL, Haucke V. Phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphates-at the interface between cell signalling and membrane traffic. EMBO J. 2016;35(6):561–579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [337].Lees JA, Li P, Kumar N, et al. Insights into lysosomal PI(3,5)P(2) homeostasis from a structural-biochemical analysis of the PIKfyve lipid kinase complex. Mol Cell. 2020;80(4):736–743e734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [338].Botelho RJ, Efe JA, Teis D, et al. Assembly of a Fab1 phosphoinositide kinase signaling complex requires the Fig4 phosphoinositide phosphatase. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19(10):4273–4286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [339].Ferguson CJ, Nassif M, Valenzuela V, et al. Neuronal expression of Fig4 is both necessary and sufficient to prevent spongiform neurodegeneration. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(16):3525–3534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [340].Bharadwaj R, Cunningham KM, Zhang K, et al. FIG4 regulates lysosome membrane homeostasis independent of phosphatase function. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(4):681–692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [341].Lenk GM, Frei CM, Miller AC, et al. Rescue of neurodegeneration in the FIG4 null mouse by a catalytically inactive FIG4 transgene. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(2):340–347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [342].Kamemura K, Chihara T. Multiple functions of the ER-resident VAP and its extracellular role in neural development and disease. J Biochem. 2019;165(5):391–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [343].Nishimura AL, Mitne-Neto M, Silva HCA, et al. A mutation in the vesicle-trafficking protein VAPB causes late-onset spinal muscular atrophy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75(5):822–831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [344].Lev S, Ben Halevy D, Peretti D, et al. The VAP protein family: from cellular functions to motor neuron disease. Trends Cell Biol. 2008;18(6):282–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [345].Mitne-Neto M, Machado-Costa M, Marchetto MCN, et al. Downregulation of VAPB expression in motor neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells of ALS8 patients. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(18):3642–3652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [346].Larroquette F, Seto L, Gaub PL, et al. Vapb /amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 8 knock-in mice display slowly progressive motor behavior defects accompanying ER stress and autophagic response. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(22):6515–6529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [347].Borgese N, Iacomino N, Colombo SF, et al. The link between VAPB loss of function and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cells. 2021;10(8):1865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [348].Teuling E, Ahmed S, Haasdijk E, et al. Motor neuron disease-associated mutant vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein (VAP) B recruits wild-type VAPs into endoplasmic reticulum-derived tubular aggregates. J Neurosci. 2007;27(36):9801–9815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [349].Anagnostou G, Akbar MT, Paul P, et al. Vesicle associated membrane protein B (VAPB) is decreased in ALS spinal cord. Neurobiol Aging. 2010;31(6):969–985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [350].Zhao YG, Liu N, Miao G, et al. The ER contact proteins VAPA/B interact with multiple autophagy proteins to modulate autophagosome biogenesis. Curr Biol. 2018;28(8):1234–1245e1234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [351].Gomez-Suaga P, Paillusson S, Stoica R, et al. The ER-mitochondria tethering complex VAPB-PTPIP51 regulates autophagy. Curr Biol. 2017;27(3):371–385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [352].Nthiga TM, Kumar Shrestha B, Sjøttem E, et al. CALCOCO 1 acts with VAMP -associated proteins to mediate ER -phagy. EMBO J. 2020;39(15):e103649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [353].Tripathi P, Guo H, Dreser A, et al. Pathomechanisms of ALS8: altered autophagy and defective RNA binding protein (RBP) homeostasis due to the VAPB P56S mutation. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(5):466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [354].Mao D, Lin G, Tepe B, et al. VAMP associated proteins are required for autophagic and lysosomal degradation by promoting a PtdIns4P-mediated endosomal pathway. Autophagy. 2019:15(7):1214–1233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [355].Williams KL, Topp S, Yang S, et al. CCNF mutations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):11253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [356].Rayner SL, Hogan A, Davidson JM, et al. Cyclin F, neurodegeneration, and the pathogenesis of ALS/FTD. Neuroscientist. 2024;30(2):214–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [357].Rayner SL, Yang S, Farrawell NE, et al. TDP-43 is a ubiquitylation substrate of the SCF(cyclin F) complex. Neurobiol Dis. 2022;167:105673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [358].Yu Y, Nakagawa T, Morohoshi A, et al. Pathogenic mutations in the ALS gene CCNF cause cytoplasmic mislocalization of Cyclin F and elevated VCP ATPase activity. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(20):3486–3497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [359].Lee A, Rayner SL, Gwee SSL, et al. Pathogenic mutation in the ALS/FTD gene, CCNF, causes elevated Lys48-linked ubiquitylation and defective autophagy. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75(2):335–354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [360].Davidson JM, Wu SSL, Rayner SL, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase SCF cyclin F promotes Sequestosome-1/p62 insolubility and foci formation and is dysregulated in ALS and FTD pathogenesis. Mol Neurobiol. 2023;60(9):5034–5054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [361].Krasniak CS, Ahmad ST. The role of CHMP2B(Intron5) in autophagy and frontotemporal dementia. Brain Res. 2016;1649:151–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [362].Williams RL, Urbe S. The emerging shape of the ESCRT machinery. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(5):355–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [363].Filimonenko M, Stuffers S, Raiborg C, et al. Functional multivesicular bodies are required for autophagic clearance of protein aggregates associated with neurodegenerative disease. J Cell Biol. 2007;179(3):485–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [364].Skibinski G, Parkinson NJ, Brown JM, et al. Mutations in the endosomal ESCRTIII-complex subunit CHMP2B in frontotemporal dementia. Nat Genet. 2005;37(8):806–808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [365].van der Zee J, Urwin H, Engelborghs S, et al. CHMP2B C-truncating mutations in frontotemporal lobar degeneration are associated with an aberrant endosomal phenotype in vitro. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(2):313–322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [366].Parkinson N, Ince PG, Smith MO, et al. ALS phenotypes with mutations in CHMP2B (charged multivesicular body protein 2B). Neurology. 2006;67(6):1074–1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [367].Cox LE, Ferraiuolo L, Goodall EF, et al. Mutations in CHMP2B in lower motor neuron predominant amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). PLoS One. 2010;5(3):e9872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [368].Ghazi-Noori S, Froud KE, Mizielinska S, et al. Progressive neuronal inclusion formation and axonal degeneration in CHMP2B mutant transgenic mice. Brain. 2012;135(3):819–832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [369].Vernay A, Therreau L, Blot B, et al. A transgenic mouse expressing CHMP2B intron5 mutant in neurons develops histological and behavioural features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(15):3341–3360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [370].Urwin H, Authier A, Nielsen JE, et al. Disruption of endocytic trafficking in frontotemporal dementia with CHMP2B mutations. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(11):2228–2238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [371].Lee JA, Liu L, Gao FB. Autophagy defects contribute to neurodegeneration induced by dysfunctional ESCRT-III. Autophagy. 2009;5(7):1070–1072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [372].Clayton EL, Milioto C, Muralidharan B, et al. Frontotemporal dementia causative CHMP2B impairs neuronal endolysosomal traffic-rescue by TMEM106B knockdown. Brain. 2018;141(12):3428–3442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [373].Lu Y, West RJH, Pons M, et al. Ik2/TBK1 and Hook/Dynein, an adaptor complex for early endosome transport, are genetic modifiers of FTD-associated mutant CHMP2B toxicity in drosophila. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [374].Baker M, Mackenzie IR, Pickering-Brown SM, et al. Mutations in progranulin cause tau-negative frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17. Nature. 2006;442(7105):916–919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [375].Cruts M, Gijselinck I, van der Zee J, et al. Null mutations in progranulin cause ubiquitin-positive frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17q21. Nature. 2006;442(7105):920–924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [376].Mukherjee O, Wang J, Gitcho M, et al. Molecular characterization of novel progranulin (GRN) mutations in frontotemporal dementia. Hum Mutat. 2008;29(4):512–521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [377].Smith KR, Damiano J, Franceschetti S, et al. Strikingly different clinicopathological phenotypes determined by progranulin-mutation dosage. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90(6):1102–1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [378].Van Damme P, Van Hoecke A, Lambrechts D, et al. Progranulin functions as a neurotrophic factor to regulate neurite outgrowth and enhance neuronal survival. J Cell Biol. 2008;181(1):37–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [379].Simon MJ, Logan T, DeVos SL, et al. Lysosomal functions of progranulin and implications for treatment of frontotemporal dementia. Trends Cell Biol. 2023;33(4):324–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [380].Kao AW, McKay A, Singh PP, et al. Progranulin, lysosomal regulation and neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(6):325–333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [381].Terryn J, Verfaillie CM, Van Damme P. Tweaking progranulin expression: therapeutic avenues and opportunities. Front Mol Neurosci. 2021;14:1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [382].Karamysheva ZN, Tikhonova EB, Karamyshev AL. Granulin in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: molecular mechanisms of the disease. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [383].Holler CJ, Taylor G, Deng Q, et al. Intracellular proteolysis of progranulin generates stable, lysosomal granulins that are haploinsufficient in patients with frontotemporal dementia caused by GRN mutations. eNeuro. 2017;4(4):ENEURO.0100–17.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [384].Ward ME, Chen R, Huang H-Y, et al. Individuals with progranulin haploinsufficiency exhibit features of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(385). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aah5642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [385].Valdez C, Wong YC, Schwake M, et al. Progranulin-mediated deficiency of cathepsin D results in FTD and NCL-like phenotypes in neurons derived from FTD patients. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(24):4861–4872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [386].Beel S, Moisse M, Damme M, et al. Progranulin functions as a cathepsin D chaperone to stimulate axonal outgrowth in vivo. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(15):2850–2863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [387].Tanaka Y, Suzuki G, Matsuwaki T, et al. Progranulin regulates lysosomal function and biogenesis through acidification of lysosomes. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(5):969–988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [388].Evers BM, Rodriguez-Navas C, Tesla RJ, et al. Lipidomic and transcriptomic basis of lysosomal dysfunction in progranulin deficiency. Cell Rep. 2017;20(11):2565–2574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [389].Tanaka Y, Matsuwaki T, Yamanouchi K, et al. Increased lysosomal biogenesis in activated microglia and exacerbated neuronal damage after traumatic brain injury in progranulin-deficient mice. Neuroscience. 2013;250:8–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [390].Gotzl JK, Colombo A-V, Fellerer K, et al. Early lysosomal maturation deficits in microglia triggers enhanced lysosomal activity in other brain cells of progranulin knockout mice. Mol Neurodegener. 2018;13(1):48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [391].Tesla R, Guhl C, Werthmann GC, et al. Benzoxazole-derivatives enhance progranulin expression and reverse the aberrant lysosomal proteome caused by GRN haploinsufficiency. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):6125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [392].Hasan S, Fernandopulle MS, Humble SW, et al. Multi-modal proteomic characterization of lysosomal function and proteostasis in progranulin-deficient neurons. bioRxiv. 2023. doi: 10.1101/2023.02.24.529955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [393].Elia LP, Mason AR, Alijagic A, et al. Genetic regulation of neuronal progranulin reveals a critical role for the autophagy-lysosome pathway. J Neurosci. 2019;39(17):3332–3344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [394].Chang MC, Srinivasan K, Friedman BA, et al. Progranulin deficiency causes impairment of autophagy and TDP-43 accumulation. J Exp Med. 2017;214(9):2611–2628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [395].Liu J, Li H, Zhou B, et al. PGRN induces impaired insulin sensitivity and defective autophagy in hepatic insulin resistance. Mol Endocrinol. 2015;29(4):528–541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [396].Lang CM, Fellerer K, Schwenk BM, et al. Membrane orientation and subcellular localization of transmembrane protein 106B (TMEM106B), a major risk factor for frontotemporal lobar degeneration. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(23):19355–19365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [397].Brady OA, Zheng Y, Murphy K, et al. The frontotemporal lobar degeneration risk factor, TMEM106B, regulates lysosomal morphology and function. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22(4):685–695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [398].Schwenk BM, Lang CM, Hogl S, et al. The FTLD risk factor TMEM106B and MAP6 control dendritic trafficking of lysosomes. EMBO J. 2014;33(5):450–467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [399].Chen-Plotkin AS, Unger TL, Gallagher MD, et al. TMEM106B, the risk gene for frontotemporal dementia, is regulated by the microRNA-132/212 cluster and affects progranulin pathways. J Neurosci. 2012;32(33):11213–11227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [400].Nicholson AM, Finch NA, Wojtas A, et al. TMEM 106B p.T185S regulates TMEM 106B protein levels: implications for frontotemporal dementia. J Neurochem. 2013;126(6):781–791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [401].Van Deerlin VM, Sleiman PMA, Martinez-Lage M, et al. Common variants at 7p21 are associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions. Nat Genet. 2010;42(3):234–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [402].Cruchaga C, Graff C, Chiang -H-H, et al. Association of TMEM106B gene polymorphism with age at onset in granulin mutation carriers and plasma granulin protein levels. Arch Neurol. 2011;68(5):581–586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [403].Finch N, Carrasquillo MM, Baker M, et al. TMEM106B regulates progranulin levels and the penetrance of FTLD in GRN mutation carriers. Neurology. 2011;76(5):467–474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [404].Gallagher MD, Suh E, Grossman M, et al. TMEM106B is a genetic modifier of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansions. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;127(3):407–418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [405].van Blitterswijk M, Mullen B, Nicholson AM, et al. TMEM106B protects C9ORF72 expansion carriers against frontotemporal dementia. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;127(3):397–406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [406].Gotzl JK, Mori K, Damme M, et al. Common pathobiochemical hallmarks of progranulin-associated frontotemporal lobar degeneration and neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;127(6):845–860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [407].Lüningschrör P, Werner G, Stroobants S, et al. The FTLD risk factor TMEM106B regulates the transport of lysosomes at the axon initial segment of motoneurons. Cell Rep. 2020;30(10):3506.e3506–3519.e3506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [408].Stagi M, Klein ZA, Gould TJ, et al. Lysosome size, motility and stress response regulated by fronto-temporal dementia modifier TMEM106B. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2014;61:226–240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [409].Busch JI, Unger TL, Jain N, et al. Increased expression of the frontotemporal dementia risk factor TMEM106B causes C9orf72-dependent alterations in lysosomes. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(13):2681–2697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [410].Klein ZA, Takahashi H, Ma M, et al. Loss of TMEM106B ameliorates lysosomal and frontotemporal dementia-related phenotypes in progranulin-deficient mice. Neuron. 2017;95(2):281–296.e286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [411].Feng T, Mai S, Roscoe JM, et al. Loss of TMEM 106B and PGRN leads to severe lysosomal abnormalities and neurodegeneration in mice. EMBO Rep. 2020;21(10):e50219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [412].Werner G, Damme M, Schludi M, et al. Loss of TMEM 106B potentiates lysosomal and FTLD -like pathology in progranulin-deficient mice. EMBO Rep. 2020;21(10):e50241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [413].Bauer CS, et al. Loss of TMEM106B exacerbates C9ALS/FTD DPR pathology by disrupting autophagosome maturation. Fronti. 2022:1–18. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.1061559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [414].Nicholson AM, Zhou X, Perkerson RB, et al. Loss of Tmem106b is unable to ameliorate frontotemporal dementia-like phenotypes in an AAV mouse model of C9ORF72-repeat induced toxicity. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2018;6(1):42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [415].Schweighauser M, Arseni D, Bacioglu M, et al. Age-dependent formation of TMEM106B amyloid filaments in human brains. Nature. 2022;605(7909):310–314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [416].Perneel J, Neumann M, Heeman B, et al. Accumulation of TMEM106B C-terminal fragments in neurodegenerative disease and aging. Acta Neuropathol. 2023;145(3):285–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [417].Schmidt EJ, Funes S, McKeon JE, et al. ALS-linked PFN1 variants exhibit loss and gain of functions in the context of formin-induced actin polymerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(23). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024605118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [418].Wu CH, Fallini C, Ticozzi N, et al. Mutations in the profilin 1 gene cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature. 2012;488(7412):499–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [419].Chen Y, zheng -Z-Z, Huang R, et al. PFN1 mutations are rare in Han Chinese populations with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34(7):1922e1921–1922e1925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [420].Ingre C, Landers JE, Rizik N, et al. A novel phosphorylation site mutation in profilin 1 revealed in a large screen of US, Nordic, and German amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/frontotemporal dementia cohorts. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34(6):1708e1701–1708e1706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [421].Witke W, Damme M, Schludi M, et al. In mouse brain profilin I and profilin II associate with regulators of the endocytic pathway and actin assembly. EMBO J. 1998;17(4):967–976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [422].Zaidi AH, Manna SK. Profilin-PTEN interaction suppresses NF-kappaB activation via inhibition of IKK phosphorylation. Biochem J. 2016;473(7):859–872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [423].Tanaka Y, Nonaka T, Suzuki G, et al. Gain-of-function profilin 1 mutations linked to familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis cause seed-dependent intracellular TDP-43 aggregation. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(7):1420–1433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [424].Yang C, Danielson EW, Qiao T, et al. Mutant PFN1 causes ALS phenotypes and progressive motor neuron degeneration in mice by a gain of toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(41):E6209–E6218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [425].Read TA, Cisterna BA, Skruber K, et al. The actin binding protein profilin 1 is critical for mitochondria function. bioRxiv. 2023. doi: 10.1101/2023.08.07.552354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [426].Teyssou E, Chartier L, Roussel D, et al. The amyotrophic lateral sclerosis M114T PFN1 mutation deregulates alternative autophagy pathways and mitochondrial homeostasis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23(10):5694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [427].Funes S, Jung J, Gadd DH, et al. Expression of ALS-PFN1 impairs vesicular degradation in iPSC-derived microglia. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):2497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [428].Guo W, Stoklund Dittlau K, Van Den Bosch L. Axonal transport defects and neurodegeneration: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019;99:133–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [429].Millecamps S, Julien JP. Axonal transport deficits and neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(3):161–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [430].Berth SH, Lloyd TE. Disruption of axonal transport in neurodegeneration. J Clin Invest. 2023;133(11). doi: 10.1172/JCI168554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [431].Guo W, Naujock M, Fumagalli L, et al. HDAC6 inhibition reverses axonal transport defects in motor neurons derived from FUS-ALS patients. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [432].Baldwin KR, Godena VK, Hewitt VL, et al. Axonal transport defects are a common phenotype in Drosophila models of ALS. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(12):2378–2392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [433].Tziortzouda P, Steyaert J, Scheveneels W, et al. PP2A and GSK3 act as modifiers of FUS-ALS by modulating mitochondrial transport. Acta Neuropathol. 2024;147(1):41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [434].Moller A, Bauer CS, Cohen RN, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-associated mutant SOD1 inhibits anterograde axonal transport of mitochondria by reducing Miro1 levels. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(23):4668–4679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [435].Bilsland LG, Sahai E, Kelly G, et al., Deficits in axonal transport precede ALS symptoms in vivo. Proc Nat Acad Sci, 2010;107:20523–20528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [436].Morfini GA, Burns M, Binder LI, et al. Axonal transport defects in neurodegenerative diseases. J Neurosci. 2009;29(41):12776–12786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [437].Fazal R, Boeynaems S, Swijsen A, et al. HDAC6 inhibition restores TDP-43 pathology and axonal transport defects in human motor neurons with TARDBP mutations. EMBO J. 2021;40(7):e106177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [438].Kreiter N, Pal A, Lojewski X, et al. Age-dependent neurodegeneration and organelle transport deficiencies in mutant TDP43 patient-derived neurons are independent of TDP43 aggregation. Neurobiol Dis. 2018;115:167–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [439].Alami NH, Smith R, Carrasco M, et al. Axonal transport of TDP-43 mRNA granules is impaired by ALS-causing mutations. Neuron. 2014;81(3):536–543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [440].Fumagalli L, Young FL, Boeynaems S, et al. C9orf72 -derived arginine-containing dipeptide repeats associate with axonal transport machinery and impede microtubule-based motility. Sci Adv. 2021;7(15):eabg3013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [441].Abo-Rady M, Kalmbach N, Pal A, et al. Knocking out C9ORF72 exacerbates axonal trafficking defects associated with hexanucleotide repeat expansion and reduces levels of heat shock proteins. Stem Cell Reports. 2020;14(3):390–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [442].Beckers J, Tharkeshwar AK, Fumagalli L, et al. A toxic gain‑of‑function mechanism in C9orf72 ALS impairs the autophagy‑lysosome pathway in neurons. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2023;11(1):151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [443].Scaber J, Thomas-Wright I, Clark AJ, et al. Cellular and axonal transport phenotypes due to the C9ORF72 HRE in iPSC motor and sensory neurons. Stem Cell Reports. 2024;19(7):957–972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [444].Reid E, Kloos M, Ashley-Koch A, et al. A kinesin heavy chain (KIF5A) mutation in hereditary spastic paraplegia (SPG10). Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71(5):1189–1194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [445].Liu YT, Laurá M, Hersheson J, et al. Extended phenotypic spectrum of KIF5A mutations. Neurology. 2014;83(7):612–619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [446].Nicolas A, Kenna KP, Renton AE, et al. Genome-wide analyses identify KIF5A as a novel ALS gene. Neuron. 2018;97(6):1267–1288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [447].Brenner D, Yilmaz R, Müller K, et al. Hot-spot KIF5A mutations cause familial ALS. Brain. 2018;141(3):688–697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [448].Cozzi M, Magri S, Tedesco B, et al. Altered molecular and cellular mechanisms in KIF5A-associated neurodegenerative or neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell Death Dis. 2024;15(9):692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [449].Liu M, Pi H, Xi Y, et al. KIF5A-dependent axonal transport deficiency disrupts autophagic flux in trimethyltin chloride-induced neurotoxicity. Autophagy. 2021;17(4):903–924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [450].Baron DM, Fenton AR, Saez-Atienzar S, et al. ALS-associated KIF5A mutations abolish autoinhibition resulting in a toxic gain of function. Cell Rep. 2022;39(1):110598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [451].Nakano J, Chiba K, Niwa S. An ALS -associated KIF5A mutant forms oligomers and aggregates and induces neuronal toxicity. Genes Cells. 2022;27(6):421–435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [452].Pant DC, Parameswaran J, Rao L, et al. ALS -linked KIF5A ΔExon27 mutant causes neuronal toxicity through gain-of-function. EMBO Rep. 2022;23(8):e54234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [453].Urnavicius L, Zhang K, Diamant AG, et al. The structure of the dynactin complex and its interaction with dynein. Science. 2015;347(6229):1441–1446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [454].Moughamian AJ, Holzbaur EL. Dynactin is required for transport initiation from the distal axon. Neuron. 2012;74(2):331–343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [455].Waterman-Storer CM, Karki SB, Kuznetsov SA, et al. The interaction between cytoplasmic dynein and dynactin is required for fast axonal transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(22):12180–12185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [456].Culver-Hanlon TL, Lex SA, Stephens AD, et al. A microtubule-binding domain in dynactin increases dynein processivity by skating along microtubules. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8(3):264–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [457].Farrer MJ, Hulihan MM, Kachergus JM, et al. DCTN1 mutations in perry syndrome. Nat Genet. 2009;41(2):163–165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [458].Puls I, Jonnakuty C, LaMonte BH, et al. Mutant dynactin in motor neuron disease. Nat Genet. 2003;33(4):455–456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [459].Munch C, Sedlmeier R, Meyer T, et al. Point mutations of the p150 subunit of dynactin (DCTN1) gene in ALS. Neurology. 2004;63(4):724–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [460].Liu X, Yang L, Tang L, et al. DCTN1 gene analysis in Chinese patients with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0182572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [461].Munch C, Rosenbohm A, Sperfeld A-D, et al. Heterozygous R1101K mutation of the DCTN1 gene in a family with ALS and FTD. Ann Neurol. 2005;58(5):777–780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [462].Vilarino-Guell C, Wider C, Soto-Ortolaza AI, et al. Characterization of DCTN1 genetic variability in neurodegeneration. Neurology. 2009;72(23):2024–2028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [463].Levy JR, Sumner CJ, Caviston JP, et al. A motor neuron disease-associated mutation in p150Glued perturbs dynactin function and induces protein aggregation. J Cell Biol. 2006;172(5):733–745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [464].Stockmann M, Meyer-Ohlendorf M, Achberger K, et al. The dynactin p150 subunit: cell biology studies of sequence changes found in ALS/MND and parkinsonian syndromes. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2013;120(5):785–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [465].Lai C, Lin X, Chandran J, et al. The G59S mutation in p150 glued causes dysfunction of dynactin in mice. J Neurosci. 2007;27(51):13982–13990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [466].Yu J, Lai C, Shim H, et al. Genetic ablation of dynactin p150(Glued) in postnatal neurons causes preferential degeneration of spinal motor neurons in aged mice. Mol Neurodegener. 2018;13(1):10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [467].Laird FM, Farah MH, Ackerley S, et al. Motor neuron disease occurring in a mutant dynactin mouse model is characterized by defects in vesicular trafficking. J Neurosci. 2008;28(9):1997–2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [468].Ikenaka K, Kawai K, Katsuno M, et al. dnc-1/dynactin 1 knockdown disrupts transport of autophagosomes and induces motor neuron degeneration. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e54511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [469].Borg R, Herrera P, Purkiss A, et al. Reduced levels of ALS gene DCTN1 induce motor defects in drosophila. Front Neurosci. 2023;17:1164251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [470].Bercier V, Hubbard JM, Fidelin K, et al. Dynactin1 depletion leads to neuromuscular synapse instability and functional abnormalities. Mol Neurodegener. 2019;14(1):27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [471].Jiang YM, Yamamoto M, Tanaka F, et al. Gene expressions specifically detected in motor neurons (dynactin 1, early growth response 3, acetyl-CoA transporter, death receptor 5, and cyclin C) differentially correlate to pathologic markers in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007;66(7):617–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [472].Kuzma-Kozakiewicz M, Chudy A, Kaźmierczak B, et al. Dynactin deficiency in the CNS of humans with sporadic ALS and mice with genetically determined motor neuron degeneration. Neurochem Res. 2013;38(12):2463–2473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [473].Smith BN, Ticozzi N, Fallini C, et al. Exome-wide rare variant analysis identifies TUBA4A mutations associated with familial ALS. Neuron. 2014;84(2):324–331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [474].Perrone F, Nguyen HP, Van Mossevelde S, et al. Investigating the role of ALS genes CHCHD10 and TUBA4A in Belgian FTD-ALS spectrum patients. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;51:177e179–177e116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [475].Pensato V, Tiloca C, Corrado L, et al. TUBA4A gene analysis in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: identification of novel mutations. J Neurol. 2015;262(5):1376–1378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [476].Helferich AM, Brockmann SJ, Reinders J, et al. Dysregulation of a novel miR-1825/TBCB/TUBA4A pathway in sporadic and familial ALS. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75(23):4301–4319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [477].Van Schoor E, Strubbe D, Braems E, et al. TUBA4A downregulation as observed in ALS post-mortem motor cortex causes ALS-related abnormalities in zebrafish. Front Cell Neurosci. 2024;18:1340240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [478].Orlacchio A, Babalini C, Borreca A, et al. SPATACSIN mutations cause autosomal recessive juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain. 2010;133(2):591–598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [479].Daoud H, Zhou S, Noreau A, et al. Exome sequencing reveals SPG11 mutations causing juvenile ALS. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(4):839e835–839e839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [480].Denora PS, Smets K, Zolfanelli F, et al. Motor neuron degeneration in spastic paraplegia 11 mimics amyotrophic lateral sclerosis lesions. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 6):1723–1734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [481].Renvoise B, Chang J, Singh R, et al. Lysosomal abnormalities in hereditary spastic paraplegia types SPG 15 and SPG 11. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2014;1(6):379–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [482].Chang J, Lee S, Blackstone C. Spastic paraplegia proteins spastizin and spatacsin mediate autophagic lysosome reformation. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(12):5249–5262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [483].Varga RE, Khundadze M, Damme M, et al. In vivo evidence for lysosome depletion and impaired autophagic clearance in hereditary spastic paraplegia type SPG11. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(8):e1005454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [484].Perez-Branguli F, Mishra HK, Prots I, et al. Dysfunction of spatacsin leads to axonal pathology in SPG11-linked hereditary spastic paraplegia. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(18):4859–4874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [485].Pierga A, Matusiak R, Cauhapé M, et al. Spatacsin regulates directionality of lysosome trafficking by promoting the degradation of its partner AP5Z1. PLoS Biol. 2023;21(10):e3002337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [486].Boutry M, Pierga A, Matusiak R, et al. Loss of spatacsin impairs cholesterol trafficking and calcium homeostasis. Commun Biol. 2019;2(1):380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [487].Van Daele SH, Masrori P, Van Damme P, et al. The sense of antisense therapies in ALS. Trends Mol Med. 2023;30(3):252–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [488].Young MM, Takahashi Y, Khan O, et al. Autophagosomal membrane serves as platform for intracellular death-inducing signaling complex (iDISC)-mediated caspase-8 activation and apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(15):12455–12468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [489].Rusmini P, Cortese K, Crippa V, et al. Trehalose induces autophagy via lysosomal-mediated TFEB activation in models of motoneuron degeneration. Autophagy. 2019;15(4):631–651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [490].Li Y, Guo Y, Wang X, et al. Trehalose decreases mutant SOD1 expression and alleviates motor deficiency in early but not end-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in a SOD1-G93A mouse model. Neuroscience. 2015;298:12–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [491].Tokuda E, Brannstrom T, Andersen PM, et al. Low autophagy capacity implicated in motor system vulnerability to mutant superoxide dismutase. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016;4(1):6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [492].Rubinsztein DC, Orr HT. Diminishing return for mechanistic therapeutics with neurodegenerative disease duration?: there may be a point in the course of a neurodegenerative condition where therapeutics targeting disease-causing mechanisms are futile. Bioessays. 2016;38(10):977–980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [493].McDermott CJ. Clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2019;32(5):758–763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [494].Levine B, Kroemer G. Biological functions of autophagy genes: a disease perspective. Cell. 2019;176(1–2):11–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [495].Wang IF, Guo B-S, Liu Y-C, et al. Autophagy activators rescue and alleviate pathogenesis of a mouse model with proteinopathies of the TAR DNA-binding protein 43. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(37):15024–15029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [496].Yue W, Deng X, Wang Z, et al. Inhibition of the MEK/ERK pathway suppresses immune overactivation and mitigates TDP-43 toxicity in a Drosophila model of ALS. Immun Ageing. 2023;20(1):27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [497].Caldi Gomes L, Hänzelmann S, Hausmann F, et al. Multiomic ALS signatures highlight subclusters and sex differences suggesting the MAPK pathway as therapeutic target. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):4893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [498].Settembre C, Di Malta C, Polito VA, et al. TFEB links autophagy to lysosomal biogenesis. Science. 2011;332(6036):1429–1433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [499].Song JX, Liu J, Jiang Y, et al. Transcription factor EB: an emerging drug target for neurodegenerative disorders. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26(1):164–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [500].Jiao F, Zhou B, Meng L. The regulatory mechanism and therapeutic potential of transcription factor EB in neurodegenerative diseases. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2023;29(1):37–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [501].Wang Y, Liu F-T, Wang Y-X, et al. Autophagic modulation by trehalose reduces accumulation of TDP-43 in a cell model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis via TFEB activation. Neurotox Res. 2018;34(1):109–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [502].Zhou D, Yan H, Yang S, et al. SC75741, A novel c-Abl inhibitor, promotes the clearance of TDP25 aggregates via ATG5-dependent autophagy pathway. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [503].Silvestrini MJ, Johnson JR, Kumar AV, et al. Nuclear export inhibition enhances HLH-30/TFEB activity, autophagy, and lifespan. Cell Rep. 2018;23(7):1915–1921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [504].Contreras PS, Tapia PJ, González-Hódar L, et al. c-Abl inhibition activates TFEB and promotes cellular clearance in a lysosomal disorder. iScience. 2020;23(11):101691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [505].Imamura K, Izumi Y, Watanabe A, et al. The Src/c-Abl pathway is a potential therapeutic target in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(391). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [506].Imamura K, Izumi Y, Nagai M, et al. Safety and tolerability of bosutinib in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (iDReAM study): a multicentre, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;53:101707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [507].Shi Y, Zlokovic BV, Ichida JK. Identification and therapeutic rescue of autophagosome and glutamate receptor defects in C9ORF72 and sporadic ALS neurons. JCI Insight. 2019;4(15):e127736–e127736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [508].Staats KA, et al. Small molecule inhibition of PIKFYVE kinase rescues gain- and loss-of-function C9orf72 ALS/FTD disease processes in vivo. bioRxiv. 2019:685800. doi: 10.1101/685800. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [509].Babu S, Nicholson KA, Rothstein JD, et al. Apilimod dimesylate in C9orf72 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomized phase 2a clinical trial. Brain. 2024;147(9):2998–3008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [510].Posor Y, Jang W, Haucke V. Phosphoinositides as membrane organizers. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022;23(12):797–816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [511].Hung S-T, Linares GR, Chang WH, et al. PIKFYVE inhibition mitigates disease in models of diverse forms of ALS. Cell. 2023:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [512].Hessvik NP, Øverbye A, Brech A, et al. PIKfyve inhibition increases exosome release and induces secretory autophagy. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(24):4717–4737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [513].Schreiber SL. The rise of molecular glues. Cell. 2021;184(1):3–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [514].Kumar D, Hassan MI. Targeted protein degraders march towards the clinic for neurodegenerative diseases. Ageing Res Rev. 2022;78(37):101616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [515].Giovannelli I, Higginbottom A, Kirby J, et al. Prospects for gene replacement therapies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2023;19(1):39–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [516].Amado DA, Davidson BL. Gene therapy for ALS: a review. Mol Ther. 2021;29(12):3345–3358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [517].Fang T, Je G, Pacut P, et al. Gene therapy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cells. 2022;11(13):2066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [518].Korobeynikov VA, Lyashchenko AK, Blanco-Redondo B, et al. Antisense oligonucleotide silencing of FUS expression as a therapeutic approach in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Med. 2022;28(1):104–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [519].Sattler R, Traynor BJ, Robertson J, et al. Roadmap for C9ORF72 in frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: report on the C9ORF72 FTD/ALS summit. Neurol Ther. 2023;12(6):1821–1843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [520].van den Berg LH, Rothstein JD, Shaw PJ, et al. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of antisense oligonucleotide BIIB078 in adults with C9orf72-associated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a phase 1, randomised, double blinded, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose study. Lancet Neurol. 2024;23(9):901–912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [521].Krishnan G, Zhang Y, Gu Y, et al. CRISPR deletion of the C9ORF72 promoter in ALS/FTD patient motor neurons abolishes production of dipeptide repeat proteins and rescues neurodegeneration. Acta Neuropathol. 2020;140(1):81–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [522].Kempthorne L, Vaizoglu D, Cammack AJ, et al. Dual-targeting CRISPR-CasRx reduces C9orf72 ALS/FTD sense and antisense repeat RNAs in vitro and in vivo. bioRxiv. 2024:577366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [523].Sevigny J, Uspenskaya O, Heckman LD, et al. Progranulin AAV gene therapy for frontotemporal dementia: translational studies and phase 1/2 trial interim results. Nat Med. 2024;30(5):1406–1415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
