Abstract
The incidence of melanoma is rising steadily around the world, with varying mortality trends among different populations. Particularly, incidence rates among young adults, below age 40 years, have increased dramatically in the past decades. In young adults, the gender predominance is switched, with the highest incidence occurring in young women. Multiple risk factors are associated with higher risk of developing melanoma. Intermittent sunlight exposure and use of tanning beds early in life increase significantly the risk of melanoma. The prevalence of tanning bed use among young women and adolescents is increasing continuously. This trend may be associated with the increase in melanoma incidence among young women. Efforts to implement new active interventions that will increase public awareness of melanoma and the risks of tanning bed use are crucial; regulations on tanning bed use especially among those underage should be implemented.
Keywords: epidemiology, incidence, melanoma, tanning, tanning beds, young adults
Although overall cancer incidence in the USA has annually declined for the past decades, the incidence of melanoma among men and women has increased rapidly and steadily [1–3]. According to estimates from the WHO, 208,251 new melanoma cases were diagnosed around the world in 2010 and with current trends, 233,648 new cases will be expected in 2015 [201]. In the USA, melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in men and the seventh most common cancer among women [1]. The American Cancer Society estimates that 76,690 new melanoma cases will be diagnosed in this country during 2013 (Table 1) [1]. In developed countries, the incidence of melanoma has increased faster than any other cancer in the last 50 years [4–10]. Melanoma has become a worldwide health concern due to the poor prognosis of advanced disease, with one person dying every hour and 9480 deaths estimated for 2013 in the USA [1,11]. In 1935, the lifetime risk of an individual in the USA developing melanoma was 1 in 1500; by 1980, the lifetime risk had increased to 1 in 250 [12]. With the steady increase in rates, currently 1 in 35 men and 1 in 54 women in the USA are diagnosed with melanoma during their lifetime [1].
Table 1.
Melanoma in the USA during 2013.
| New cases | 76,690 |
| Men | 45,060 |
| Women | 31,630 |
| Deaths | 9480 |
| Lifetime risk | |
| Men | 1:35 |
| Women | 1:54 |
American Cancer Society estimate statistics for melanoma in the USA during 2013.
Data taken from [1].
Overall, melanoma risk increases with age and is greater in men and white populations [11]; however, recent reports have shown dramatic increases in incidence of melanoma among young adults with higher incidence in women among this age group [13–15]. When compared to all-cancer incidence rates by age group, the proportion of melanoma peaks between 20 and 40 years of age and then decreases [16]. In adults under 40 years old (hereinafter called young adults), melanoma accounts for over 11% of diagnosed cancers and is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer after breast cancer [13,14]. This increased incidence may be attributable to several causes, including enhanced public awareness, earlier detection and changes in natural and/or artificial UV radiation exposure. This article reviews current knowledge of the epidemiology of melanoma, with particular emphasis on the young adult population from the USA.
Incidence
The dramatic increase in melanoma incidence throughout the world during the last six decades has been well established [17], with incidence rates varying greatly between countries. Currently, Australia has the highest incidence rates in the world with 49.8/100,000 melanoma cases reported annually and a 1 in 17 risk of developing melanoma by the age of 85 years [18]. In the USA, it is estimated that 45,060 men and 31,630 women will be newly diagnosed with melanoma in 2013 [1]. Based on current data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program, the annual age-adjusted incidence rate of melanoma in the USA is 21.1/100,000 [202], increasing from previously reported rates of 19.2/100,000 in 2006 [19]. In the USA, melanoma incidence rates have increased steadily over the last decades increasing by 270% from 1973 to 2002 [11], far surpassing the rise in the incidence rates for most other cancers [6]. Current reports estimate a 2.6% annual increase in incidence from 1975 to 2010 [202], comparable to the 2.3% average annual change observed in Australia [18] and suggesting a worldwide phenomenon. Among young adults, similar trends are observed. In England, the incidence of melanoma among 15–24-year-olds doubled from 10.0 to 20.2 cases per million during the period of 1979 to 1997 [20]. Reports from Northern England show similar trends in incidence rates, particularly among young adult women in which the incidence of melanoma increased at an average annual rate of 5%, rising from 8.3 to 30.8 cases per million during the period of 1968–2005 [21]. However, melanoma incidence, mortality rates and data availability vary significantly between European countries [22]; but consistently across the world white populations have 10-times the risk of developing melanoma than Asian, black or Hispanic populations [11].
Published data from the SEER program show that the age-adjusted annual incidence rate for young adult women under 40 years old in the USA has more than doubled from 5.5/100,000 in 1973 to 13.9/100,000 in 2004 [23]. In young men, annual incidence rates increased from 4.7 cases/100,000 persons in 1973 to 7.7/100,000 in 2004 [23]. Recent reports from our group showed even higher rates with a more than sixfold increase in melanoma incidence among young adults in Olmsted County, Minnesota during the past 40 years [15]. In the young adult population of Minnesota, the overall age- and sex-adjusted melanoma incidence was 16.9 cases/100,000 person-years with incidence rates significantly increasing with age and year of diagnosis for both young women and men [15]. Consistent with SEER data that report increases of at least sevenfold in the relative risk of being given a diagnosis of melanoma among young adults between the ages of 15–19 years and 35–39 years [24]; being the fifth most frequent cancer in the 15–19-year age groups and becoming the most frequent in the 25–29-year age groups, when gender is not considered [25]. Similar marked rises in incidence with increasing age and year of diagnosis among young adults have been reported worldwide [13,18,20]. In Australia, incidence rates increase from 11.9/100,000 in the 20–29-year age groups to 28.0/100,000 in the 30–39-year age groups [18]. Overall, the incidence of melanoma increases linearly with age from 20 to 80 years; however, a switch in gender dominance occurs around the age of 40 years [16].
Mortality & survival
Overall, cancer death rates have decreased consistently since 2001 by 1.8% per year in men and by 1.5% per year in women in the USA [1]. Melanoma is one of the few cancers with an increasing mortality rate. Melanoma-related mortality continues to increase consistently with its increasing incidence though at a lower rate [1]. The US melanoma mortality significantly increased annually from 1975 to 1990 by 1.5% and has remained stable from 2005 to 2009 by increasing only 0.4% annually in men and decreasing 0.5% annually in women [202]. Similar mortality trends have been reported in Nordic European countries, Australia, England and Canada, with annual increase rates of 2–4% and stabilization of rising trends in recent birth cohorts [26,27]. However, data from the WHO Cancer Mortality Data Bank suggest great variability in mortality among populations on the melanoma mortality epidemic curve, with some countries having stabilization of the rising trends and others a steep increase [28].
Melanoma represents <5% of skin cancer cases diagnosed in the USA, but it accounts for the vast majority of skin cancer deaths, with approximately one person dying every hour from metastatic melanoma [11,29]. It is estimated that 46,372 melanoma-related deaths occurred worldwide in 2008 and according to WHO estimates, 54,913 deaths will be expected in 2015 [201]. In the USA, 9480 melanoma-related deaths are expected in 2013 and the age-adjusted death rate is estimated to be 2.7/100,000 individuals per year [1,202]. However, survival rates in melanoma patients of all age groups have improved during the past decades [16]; in the USA, 5-year survival rates increased from 81.9% in 1975 to 93.1% in 2009 [202]. Current 5-year survival rates range from 98% for localized melanoma to 62 and 15% for regional and distant stage disease, respectively [29,202].
Contrary to the overall increase in melanoma-related mortality, the death rate among young adults has decreased steadily since the 1970s [15,16,23]; with the greatest reduction in mortality seen in the 20- to 29-year-olds from 1975 to 2000 and the 30- to 44-year-olds from 1990 to 2000 [16]. It is estimated that death rates among young adults decreased by 2.8% per year in men and by 2.0% per year in women from 2005 to 2009 [29]. Likewise, data from the Minnesota young adult population show that each 1-year increase in calendar year of diagnosis is associated with a significantly lower risk of melanoma-related death [15].
It is well known that survival and age of melanoma patients are inversely correlated, with <8% of the melanoma-related deaths occurring in patients younger than 45 years old [202]. Age has been identified in several studies as an independent prognostic predictor of disease-free and overall survival [30–32]. Hence, among young adults, the 5-year survival rate is 94.6% higher than the overall rate [202]. Mortality rates are also lower among young adults, ranging from 0.2/100,000 in the 20–24 age groups, 0.3/100,000 in the 25–29 age groups, 0.6/100,000 in the 30–34 age groups and 0.8/100,000 in 35–39 age groups [202]. These low mortality and high survival rates among young patients have been attributed to the high proportion of thin melanomas and localized disease within this age group. Hence, those with regional involvement and metastatic disease have poorer prognosis and inferior 5-year survival rates similar to those observed overall for all age groups [33].
Gender differences
Gender-related differences in incidence and mortality of cancer are well established and consistent worldwide. It has been well documented that among melanoma patients, women have superior survival over men [34–36]. Overall, the incidence and mortality of melanoma are greater in men than women; men are approximately 1.5-times more likely to develop melanoma than women [1,11,37]. These higher incidence rates in men have been consistent throughout the years; in 1975, incidence rates were 8.54/100,000 for men and 7.4/100,000 for women, increasing to 27.45/100,000 for men and 16.81/100,000 for women in 2010 [202]. Similarly, the annual percent increase in melanoma for all ages is greater in men than women, 6.1 versus 2.8% [202].
However, among young adults, the incidence rate of melanoma in women is twice that in men [19,29]; approximately at the age of 40 years, a switch in gender dominance occurs leading to higher rates in older men as seen in Figure 1 [16,38]. This opposite gender predominance among young melanoma cases has been observed in populations around the world [13,21,38–40]. In the USA, SEER data from 2006 showed age-specific incidence rates greater among women than men prior to the age of 40 years; 6.9 versus 4.6/100,000 person years, respectively [41]. In 2010, incidence rates in adults younger than 44 years old had achieved 8.2/100,000 for women versus 5.3/100,000 per men [202]. This higher incidence among young women is preserved in all racial and ethnic groups [42]
Figure 1. Age-specific melanoma incidence rates in the USA.

Age-specific melanoma incidence rates from 18 SEER areas in 2006–2010. Rates are per 100,000 and are age-adjusted to the 2000 US Standard Population.
Data taken from [202].
According to SEER data, the increase in melanoma incidence among young adults in the last decades may be attributable to the increase in incidence in young women; age-adjusted incidence rates of melanoma among 15–39-year-old women have increased from 5.5 to 13.9 cases/100,000 person-years from 1973 to 2004, with a 2.7% annual increase since 1992, whereas rates among young men of the same age group stabilized after 1980 with an annual percentage change of only 0.4% [23,24]. Within this young adult patient group, age-adjusted incidence rates were superior in women in every race group, ethnicity, age and year of diagnosis [24]. However, in Olmsted County, Minnesota, increasing incidence trends were observed for both men and women from 1970 to 2009 [15]. Over the 30-year period, melanoma incidence increased four-fold in young men and, prominently, during the same period incidence rates rose eightfold among young women; rising from 4.3 to 18.6/100,000 and from 5.4 to 43.5/100,000, respectively [15].
In the past decades, survival rates averaged 90% among young adults diagnosed with melanoma. In all age groups, men have lower survival rates than women; this difference is observed even in young adults with differences in 5-year survival up to 88% versus 96% for men and women, respectively [16]. This significant advantage in survival among younger women is observed in populations around the world [36,43] and is independent of stage of disease, histologic type and decreases in mortality within this age group [23,43].
Tumor characteristics
Pathologic features
Histogenic subtype, tumor thickness, ulceration, level of invasion, mitotic rate, vascular invasion, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and lymph node involvement are some of the prognostic factors associated with different outcomes among melanoma patients [31]. In general, younger melanoma patients have a more favorable clinicopathologic profile than older patients, contributing to their increased survival [44,45].
Melanomas are classified according to their gross clinical and pathological features under four main histogenic subtypes: superficial spreading, nodular, lentigo maligna and acral lentiginous [46]. Superficial spreading melanoma is the most common subtype of melanoma, accounting for ~70% of cases followed by nodular melanoma [46,47]. Superficial spreading melanoma is often seen in younger patients and on areas of intermittent sun exposure including the trunk, back and extremities [46]. On the contrary, nodular melanomas are more common in older patients, near the seventh decade of life [46]. As expected, the same distribution of histogenic subtype is maintained among young adults; superficial spreading melanoma is the most common melanoma reported among young men and women followed by nodular subtype, representing 70 and 5% of the cases, respectively [15,24].
Increased tumor thickness is associated with decreased survival; data from the young adult population in Minnesota show that patients with Breslow thickness greater than 2.0 mm were more than nine-times more likely to die of melanoma [15]. However, recent reports have shown increasing incidence rates mainly for thin tumors in young men and women during the past decades [19]. Currently, the higher incidence and superior survival of young women with melanoma are believed to result generally from the increased proportion of thin nonulcerated lesions [19,32], which are associated with better prognosis and could be attributable to earlier detection [48,49]. However, analysis from SEER data has shown that since 1990 the incidence of melanoma among young women increased for both thinner and thicker tumors [23], suggesting that this increasing trend in young women is not only caused by earlier detection but other genetic, environmental and behavioral factors may be involved.
Anatomic distribution
The differential anatomical distribution of melanoma is gender dependent and is mainly attributed to differences in gender-specific patterns of sun exposure, independent of histogenic subtype [50,51]. In general, the most common areas affected by melanoma are the trunk for men and the lower extremity for women [43,50,52–57], and these differences are preserved in countries with widely varying latitudes [58].
Among young adults, differences in the anatomical location of melanoma between sexes are also observed. Between melanomas of the head and neck, young men have higher incidence rates, with proportionately double the number of cases diagnosed in men [24,38]. Though, the head and neck is the least commonly affected site in young adults compared with older individuals in which it is the most common [16,24,43].
Among young adults from Minnesota, the most common location of melanomas in young women is the lower extremity, followed by the upper extremity; on the contrary, young men from the Minnesota population were more likely to have melanomas on the back also followed by the upper extremity [15]. Similar trends are observed in national statistics from 1975 to 2006 [41], although with the increasing incidences, the distribution of melanomas changed over time by anatomic site and gender. The higher shifts are seen in melanoma of the trunk among women younger than 40 years [24,41,59]. Within this age group, truncal lesions increased at a superior rate than any other sites in women, becoming the most common anatomical site among young women from 1999 to 2006, followed by the lower extremities [24,41]. Nonetheless, the extremities are still more likely to be affected in women than in men, with predilection for the lower extremities among this gender [16]. Changes in the anatomical distribution of melanoma in young women over the last decade are believed to be secondary to changes in sun exposure patterns, increased tanning behavior or changes in clothing patterns derived from various environmental, behavioral or cultural factors.
Risk factors
Risk factors for melanoma are well established and include host and environmental factors; these are summarized in Box 1. Phenotypic characteristics, family history, socioeconomic status, exposure to sunlight and several other factors are discussed sub-sequently, with particular emphasis on artificial UV radiation and tanning beds.
Box 1.
Melanoma risk factors.
| Fitzpatrick skin types I and II |
| Red or blond hair |
| Blue or green eyes |
| Number of nevi |
| Dysplastic nevi |
| Family history of melanoma |
| Personal history of melanoma or nonmelanoma skin cancers |
| Inability to tan |
| Sunlight exposure |
| Tanning bed use |
| History of sunburns |
| Higher socioeconomic status |
Phenotypic characteristics
Worldwide, the highest rates of melanoma are seen in white populations, accounting for >90% of the melanoma cases among young adults [16,202]. The risk of developing melanoma is inversely related to the degree of skin pigmentation [60]. Therefore, non-Hispanic white individuals have higher sensitivity to sun exposure and approximately 10-times greater risk of developing melanoma compared with Hispanic, Asian or black populations [11,61]. Also, presence of freckles, blue or green eyes, red or blond hair, increased sun sensitivity and the inability to tan have been associated with twice the risk of melanoma [9,62–66]. These phenotypic characteristics have been associated with genetic variations in melanocortin-1 receptor, an independent risk factor for developing melanoma [67].
The presence of melanocytic nevi is also known to be risk factor for melanoma, with ~25% of melanomas occurring in conjunction with a preexisting nevus [68]. However, the risk of developing melanoma fluctuates according to the size, number, histologic type and anatomic location of nevi. A high count of melanocytic nevi is associated with increased risk of developing melanoma; the risk is 1.5-times higher among those with more than 10 nevi and increases with higher nevi counts [69–73]. Likewise, nevi larger than 5 mm and dysplastic nevi are associated with a higher risk of melanoma [64,71,72,74–76]. Notably, melanomas that develop with an associated nevus are more likely to occur in younger patients, to be located in the trunk and to be of the superficial spreading subtype [68,77].
Family history
Family history of melanoma is a strong risk factor for developing this tumor. Having a first-degree relative with history of melanoma doubles the risk of developing this cancer when compared with those individuals without family history [78–80]; the risk is highest among patients with a parent with history of multiple melanomas [81]. Personal history of melanoma or nonmelanoma skin cancer has also been associated with higher risk of developing this tumor [82,83].
Up to 10% of all melanoma cases are attributed to familial melanoma syndrome [84]. This syndrome should be suspected in patients with family history who present with melanoma before the age of 40 years, multiple primary melanomas and history of dysplastic nevi [85–87]. Mutations in CDKN2A and CDK4 are the most common genetic abnormalities found in these families [85,86]. However, patients with genetic predisposition are more likely to have a better prognosis and superficially invasive melanomas [82,88].
Socioeconomic status
Melanoma has been identified as a tumor affecting those of higher socioeconomic class in contrast to squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that is associated with lower socioeconomic status. Studies from around the world show a positive association between higher socioeconomic status and increased melanoma incidence [89–92]. Data from national SEER program have shown that the risk of melanoma almost doubles in those with a college education compared with those with less than high school education [93], independent of age or gender [94]. An income gradient was also observed; those with family incomes <$12,500 have almost half the risk than those with a family income of $50,000 or more [93]. However, these associations may result from differences in a variety of factors, including knowledge of melanoma prevention, access to health care, sunbathing attitudes and practices, leisure and vacation time and recreational sun exposure [5,90,94,95].
Sunlight exposure
Exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) has been identified as the most important environmental risk factor for the development of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers. It is evident that exposure to sunlight and the skin damage caused by it [96,97], particularly at younger ages, play a crucial role in the development of melanoma with >80% of cases being attributed to sun exposure [98]. Evidence supports that average annual amounts of natural UVR exposure correlate with the incidence of melanoma [17]. Furthermore, areas of higher altitudes and/or lower latitudes, where natural UVR is more intense, have the highest incidence of melanoma [37,99].
The amounts of acute and chronic sun exposure that a person has received in their lifetime are determinants of the risk of melanoma. Particularly, intermittent sun exposure, measured by history of sunburns, seems to have a major causal effect on the risk of developing melanoma when compared with chronic sun exposure [100]. The risk of developing melanoma doubles in those with history of sunburn and is higher among those with history of sunburns in childhood, adolescence and young adulthood [9,66,100–102]. Moreover, the risk of melanoma increases parallel to the number of sunburns; history of more than 10 severe painful sunburns is associated with higher risk of developing melanoma in all body sites, with the highest increment in the upper extremity by up to 6.8-fold [78].
Artificial UVR exposure
Since the 1970s artificial UVR sources, in the form of tanning beds, have gained enormous popularity around the world, with the prevalence of its use varying greatly among different countries [103]. By the end of the 1990s, 50% of men and 60% of women aged 18- to 50-years old in Northern Europe reported using tanning beds at least once during their lifetime [104]. In the USA, the average number of tanning salons per city exceeds the average number of Starbucks or McDonald’s [105], with more than 1 million users per day [106]. By 2005, almost 30 million people in the USA tanned indoors [106], with the highest prevalence among those younger than 35 years old [103]. Over 2.3 million adolescents in the USA use tanning beds [106]; according to the 2011 Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, 13% of all high school students and 21% of high school girls reported indoor tanning [107]. Even though tanning bed use is more common in young individuals, it is prevalent among all age groups, including 8% of men and women over 65 years old [108].
The 2010 National Health Interview Survey also reported higher prevalence indoor tanning among women; use of tanning beds were most common in young non-Hispanic white women [109]. Among young white women, those aged 18–21 years had the higher prevalence with 32% reporting use of tanning beds at an average of 28 sessions per year [109]. The highest national indoor tanning rates are seen among residents of the Midwest [109]. Studies from the population of Minnesota, USA have shown that most tanning bed users report first use as adolescents [110]. Also, they report that tanning bed users are more likely to have higher education level or income [110], factors known to be associated with higher risk of developing melanoma.
The UVR emission of a modern tanning appliance is equivalent to the UVR of midday tropical sun [103]; high-pressure tanning units produce UVR levels up to 15-times higher than the radiation emitted by the sun at midday, an exposure this intense is not naturally found in the environment [111,112]. The annual dose of UV-A radiation received by frequent tanning bed users is up to 4.7-times higher than the average UV-A radiation an individual will receive from sunlight, in addition to the radiation received from sun exposure [104]. Hence, these artificial UVR-emitting tanning devices have been included by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, an affiliate of the WHO as a Group 1 carcinogen; classifying them in the same category as well-known carcinogens like plutonium, γ-radiation, asbestos, cigarettes and solar UVR [113]. With the high radiation doses received, 18–55% of tanning bed users in Europe and North America report skin erythema or burns after artificial UVR exposure [114]; these tanning bed-induced burns confer an increased risk of melanoma similar to that of natural sunburns [115].
The skin damage caused by cumulative annual sunlight exposure is augmented by exposure to artificial sources of UVR, like tanning beds, positioning users at a higher risk of developing melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers [116]. Multiple reports and metanalysis have shown a higher risk of melanoma among tanning bed users [103,117]. Notably, using a tanning bed just once increases the risk of developing melanoma by 15–22% [104,112,116–119]. A dose–response relationship between hours, sessions or years of tanning bed use and risk of melanoma are observed [115], with the risk of melanoma significantly increasing among those that use tanning beds more than once a month [9]. Tanning bed use is associated with melanomas arising from the trunk [115,120]; the increase in truncal melanoma rates among young women in the last decade correlates with the increasing trends of indoor tanning among this population [24,41].
Several studies have suggested a higher vulnerability to the oncogenic effects of artificial UVR in young individuals. Having a first exposure to artificial UVR before the age of 35 years increases the risk of melanoma by at least 75% and is associated with earlier tumor development [104,112,119,121]. The higher susceptibility to artificial UVR among young adults and the increasing use of tanning beds play an important role in the current increasing trends in melanoma incidence among younger women [23,104,122]. Despite the multiple attempts to increase public awareness of the harms of UVR exposure, young women appear oblivious of the risks related to tanning bed use and uninformed about the specific risk factors, signs and seriousness of melanoma [123]. Hence, further active interventions are needed to increase awareness and decrease risk factors associated with melanoma in young individuals.
Expert commentary
Melanoma incidence rates continue increasing at alarming rates around the world. Particularly, among young women who are at higher risk than young men. This population of young women also has higher practice of risky behaviors associated with increased risk of melanoma, like indoor tanning. In the past decades, tanning bed use has spread throughout the world becoming a common practice among the young in countries of North America, Europe and even sunny regions like Australia. The highest prevalence of indoor tanning practices is seen among women, particularly young women who are also responsible for the rising incidence of melanoma in this age group. Even though tanning devices have been classified as carcinogenic, and multiple studies have attributed the higher incidence of melanoma to their widespread use, there still are very few to nonexistent laws regulating their use, which makes the future of melanoma worrisome. This issue is particularly critical among adolescents who have unrestricted access to tanning beds in most states and countries. For example, currently in the USA, only a few states ban or regulate the use of tanning beds among those under 18 years old and those that do possess regulations can still use them with parental consent [124]. Worldwide regulations are also limited with only 11 countries having laws that restrict indoor tanning in those younger than 18 years old and only one country, Brazil, banning indoor tanning for all age groups [125]. The parallel increasing trends in melanoma incidence and tanning bed use emphasize the necessity of new active interventions and laws that can be implemented in our communities to eradicate modifiable melanoma risk factors like indoor tanning. In addition, primary care providers and the public should be aware of the increasing trends of skin cancer among young individuals so screening exams and education campaigns on sun protection techniques can be reinforced.
Five-year view
Although many have argued that the increase in incidence of melanoma among young adults is the result of increased surveillance and the identification of thin tumors, with inherent good prognosis, recent data showed increases in both thick and thin melanomas suggesting a real increase in incidence [23]. Natural and, most importantly, artificial UVR exposures play a critical role in the increasing incidence trend observed among young adults, particularly young women. If the current trends continue the number of incidence, then cases will increase around the world. However, with the current advances in therapy and the stabilization of mortality rates among this age group, the prevalence of melanoma survivors will also increase. Hence, efforts to improve the public awareness regarding the harms of indoor tanning and unprotected sunlight exposure should be enhanced. Since skin checks are more prevalent among older adults, particular focus should be given to increase the awareness of primary physicians who can identify patients with risk factors, educate them and refer them to a dermatologist when necessary. Regulations on tanning bed use should also improve and expand worldwide. Current media support and advertisement promoting tanning practices and their widespread availability at homes, spas, gyms and tanning salons make age regulations and parental consents insufficient. Hence, countries around the world should follow Brazil’s example and should create tighter laws that will prohibit indoor tanning in all age groups. More education also needs to be provided to the general population educating them about the harms of this activity and unsafe sun exposure.
Key issues.
The incidence of melanoma continues to increase worldwide.
Young women, under 40 years of age, are at increased risk of developing melanoma compared with men. However, higher survival is observed among women in this age group.
Tanning bed use is associated with higher UVR exposures and higher risk of developing skin cancer; even one use of a tanning bed increases the risk of melanoma.
Sunburns caused by natural sunlight or artificial UVR are both associated with higher risk of melanoma, particularly if those occurred before the age of 35 years.
Knowledge of the risks associated with indoor tanning and unprotected sunbathing, may decrease the prevalence of its use and may decrease the incidence of melanoma.
Financial & competing interests disclosure
This publication is supported in part by Mayo CTSA (grant number UL1TR000135) from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. This review’s contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NIH.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
References
Papers of special note have been highlighted as:
• of interest
•• of considerable interest
- 1.Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J. Clin 63(1) 11–30 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Erickson C, Driscoll MS. Melanoma epidemic: Facts and controversies. Clin. Dermatol 28(3) 281–286 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Linos E, Swetter SM, Cockburn MG, Colditz GA, Clarke CA. Increasing burden of melanoma in the United States. J. Invest. Dermatol 129(7) 1666–1674 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Erdei E, Torres SM. A new understanding in the epidemiology of melanoma. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther 10(11) 1811–1823 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.De Vries E, Bray FI, Coebergh JW, Parkin DM. Changing epidemiology of malignant cutaneous melanoma in Europe 1953–1997: rising trends in incidence and mortality but recent stabilizations in western Europe and decreases in Scandinavia. Int. J. Cancer 107(1) 119–126 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jemal A, Devesa SS, Hartge P, Tucker MA. Recent trends in cutaneous melanoma incidence among whites in the United States. J. Natl Cancer Inst 93(9) 678–683 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E. et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J. Clin 56(2) 106–130 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marks R Epidemiology of melanoma. Clin. Exp. Dermatol 25(6) 459–463 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Veierod MB, Weiderpass E, Thorn M et al. A prospective study of pigmentation, sun exposure, and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in women. J. Natl Cancer Inst 95(20) 1530–1538 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Geller AC, Swetter SM, Brooks K, Demierre MF, Yaroch AL. Screening, early detection, and trends for melanoma: current status (2000–2006) and future directions. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol 57(4) 555–572; quiz 573–556 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ries LA, Wingo PA, Miller DS et al. The annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer. Cancer 88(10) 2398–2424 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rigel DS. Epidemiology and prognostic factors in malignant melanoma. Ann. Plast. Surg 28(1) 7–8 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Aben KK, Van Gaal C, Van Gils NA, Van Der Graaf WT, Zielhuis GA. Cancer in adolescents and young adults (15–29 years): a population-based study in the Netherlands 1989–2009. Acta Oncol 51(7) 922–933 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bleyer A, Barr R. Cancer in young adults 20 to 39 years of age: overview. Semin. Oncol 36(3) 194–206 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Provides a summary highlighting the prevalence of melanoma among other cancers in the young adult population.
- 15.Reed KB, Brewer JD, Lohse CM, Bringe KE, Pruitt CN, Gibson LE. Increasing incidence of melanoma among young adults: an epidemiological study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Mayo Clin. Proc 87(4) 328–334 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Study showing the increasing trends of melanoma among young adults.
- 16.Bleyer A, O’leary M, Barr R, Ries LE. Cancer Epidemiology in Older Adolescents and Young Adults 15 to 29 Years of Age, Including SEER Incidence and Survival: 1975–2000 National Cancer Institute, NIH Pub. No. 06-5767, Bethesda, MD: (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Armstrong BK, Kricker A. The epidemiology of UV induced skin cancer. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 63(1–3), 8–18 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). ACIM (Australian Cancer Incidence and Mortality) Books AIHW, Canberra: (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jemal A, Saraiya M, Patel P et al. Recent trends in cutaneous melanoma incidence and death rates in the United States, 1992–2006. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol 65(5 Suppl. 1), S17–25 e11–13 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Birch JM, Alston RD, Kelsey AM, Quinn MJ, Babb P, Mcnally RJ. Classification and incidence of cancers in adolescents and young adults in England 1979–1997. Br. J. Cancer 87(11) 1267–1274 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Magnanti BL, Dorak MT, Parker L, Craft AW, James PW, Mcnally RJ. Sex-specific incidence and temporal trends in solid tumours in young people from Northern England, 1968–2005. BMC Cancer 8, 89 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Forsea AM, Del Marmol V, De Vries E, Bailey EE, Geller AC. Melanoma incidence and mortality in Europe: new estimates, persistent disparities. Br. J. Dermatol 167(5) 1124–1130 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Purdue MP, Freeman LE, Anderson WF, Tucker MA. Recent trends in incidence of cutaneous melanoma among US Caucasian young adults. J. Invest. Dermatol 128(12) 2905–2908 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Study showing the increasing trends of melanoma among young adults.
- 24.Weir HK, Marrett LD, Cokkinides V et al. Melanoma in adolescents and young adults (ages 15–39 years): United States, 1999–2006. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol 65(5 Suppl. 1), S38–49 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bleyer A, Viny A, Barr R. Cancer in 15- to 29-year-olds by primary site. Oncologist 11(6) 590–601 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.La Vecchia C, Lucchini F, Negri E, Levi F. Recent declines in worldwide mortality from cutaneous melanoma in youth and middle age. Int. J. Cancer 81(1) 62–66 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lens MB, Dawes M. Global perspectives of contemporary epidemiological trends of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Br. J. Dermatol 150(2) 179–185 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Severi G, Giles GG, Robertson C, Boyle P, Autier P. Mortality from cutaneous melanoma: evidence for contrasting trends between populations. Br. J. Cancer 82(11) 1887–1891 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.American Cancer Society (ACS). Cancer Facts & Figures 2013 American Cancer Society, Atlanta: (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Austin PF, Cruse CW, Lyman G, Schroer K, Glass F, Reintgen DS. Age as a prognostic factor in the malignant melanoma population. Ann. Surg. Oncol 1(6) 487–494 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Balch CM, Soong SJ, Gershenwald JE et al. Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system. J. Clin. Oncol 19(16) 3622–3634 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chagpar RB, Ross MI, Reintgen DS et al. Factors associated with improved survival among young adult melanoma patients despite a greater incidence of sentinel lymph node metastasis. J. Surg. Res 143(1) 164–168 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cinar P, Zell JA, Taylor TH, Sender LS, Anton-Culver H. Pediatric and AYA invasive cutaneous melanoma: population-based study comparing adult melanoma cases. J. Clin. Oncol 2008 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition) 26(15S), 9071 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shaw HM, Milton GW, Farago G, Mccarthy WH. Endocrine influences on survival from malignant melanoma. Cancer 42(2) 669–677 (1978). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stidham KR, Johnson JL, Seigler HF. Survival superiority of females with melanoma. A multivariate analysis of 6383 patients exploring the significance of gender in prognostic outcome. Arch. Surg 129(3) 316–324 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Thorn M, Adami HO, Ringborg U, Bergstrom R, Krusemo UB. Long-term survival in malignant melanoma with special reference to age and sex as prognostic factors. J. Natl Cancer Inst 79(5) 969–974 (1987). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lee JA, Strickland D. Malignant melanoma: social status and outdoor work. Br. J. Cancer 41(5) 757–763 (1980). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liu F, Bessonova L, Taylor TH, Ziogas A, Meyskens FL Jr., Anton-Culver H. A unique gender difference in early onset melanoma implies that in addition to ultraviolet light exposure other causative factors are important. Pigment Cell Melanoma. Res 26(1) 128–135 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Desandes E, Lacour B, Belot A et al. Cancer Incidence and Survival in Adolescents and Young Adults in France, 2000–2008. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wu X, Groves FD, Mclaughlin CC, Jemal A, Martin J, Chen VW. Cancer incidence patterns among adolescents and young adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 16(3) 309–320 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bradford PT, Anderson WF, Purdue MP, Goldstein AM, Tucker MA. Rising melanoma incidence rates of the trunk among younger women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev 19(9) 2401–2406 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wu XC, Eide MJ, King J et al. Racial and ethnic variations in incidence and survival of cutaneous melanoma in the United States, 1999–2006. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol 65(5 Suppl. 1), S26–S37 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kemeny MM, Busch E, Stewart AK, Menck HR. Superior survival of young women with malignant melanoma. Am. J. Surg 175(6) 437–444; discussion 444–435 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chao C, Martin RC 2nd, Ross MI et al. Correlation between prognostic factors and increasing age in melanoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol 11(3) 259–264 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mcmasters KM, Noyes RD, Reintgen DS et al. Lessons learned from the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial. J. Surg. Oncol 86(4) 212–223 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Scolyer RA, Long GV, Thompson JF. Evolving concepts in melanoma classification and their relevance to multidisciplinary melanoma patient care. Mol. Oncol 5(2) 124–136 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Markovic SN, Erickson LA, Rao RD et al. Malignant melanoma in the 21st century, part 1: epidemiology, risk factors, screening, prevention, and diagnosis. Mayo Clin. Proc 82(3) 364–380 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cho YR, Chiang MP. Epidemiology, staging (new system), and prognosis of cutaneous melanoma. Clin. Plast. Surg 37(1) 47–53 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC Melanoma Staging and Classification. J. Clin. Oncol 27(36) 6199–6206 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Elwood JM, Gallagher RP. Body site distribution of cutaneous malignant melanoma in relationship to patterns of sun exposure. Int. J. Cancer 78(3) 276–280 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Curtin JA, Fridlyand J, Kageshita T et al. Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med 353(20) 2135–2147 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Clark LN, Shin DB, Troxel AB, Khan S, Sober AJ, Ming ME. Association between the anatomic distribution of melanoma and sex. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol 56(5) 768–773 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Great study showing the anatomic distribution differences of melanoma based on gender.
- 53.Elwood JM, Gallagher RP, Hill GB, Pearson JC. Cutaneous melanoma in relation to intermittent and constant sun exposure–the Western Canada Melanoma Study. Int. J. Cancer 35(4) 427–433 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Elwood JM, Lee JA. Recent data on the epidemiology of malignant melanoma. Semin. Oncol 2(2) 149–154 (1975). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Green A, Maclennan R, Youl P, Martin N. Site distribution of cutaneous melanoma in Queensland. Int. J. Cancer 53(2) 232–236 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Houghton A, Flannery J, Viola MV. Malignant melanoma in Connecticut and Denmark. Int. J. Cancer 25(1) 95–104 (1980). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kojo K, Jansen CT, Nybom P et al. Population exposure to ultraviolet radiation in Finland 1920–1995: Exposure trends and a time-series analysis of exposure and cutaneous melanoma incidence. Environ. Res 101(1) 123–131 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Armstrong BK, Kricker A. Cutaneous melanoma. Cancer Surv 19–20, 219–240 (1994). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Perez-Gomez B, Aragones N, Gustavsson P, Lope V, Lopez-Abente G, Pollan M. Do sex and site matter? Different age distribution in melanoma of the trunk among Swedish men and women. Br. J. Dermatol 158(4) 766–772 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS et al. Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: III. Family history, actinic damage and phenotypic factors. Eur. J. Cancer 41(14) 2040–2059 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tadokoro T, Yamaguchi Y, Batzer J et al. Mechanisms of skin tanning in different racial/ethnic groups in response to ultraviolet radiation. J. Invest. Dermatol 124(6) 1326–1332 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lin JY, Fisher DE. Melanocyte biology and skin pigmentation. Nature 445(7130) 843–850 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Naldi L, Altieri A, Imberti GL, Giordano L, Gallus S, La Vecchia C. Cutaneous malignant melanoma in women. Phenotypic characteristics, sun exposure, and hormonal factors: a case-control study from Italy. Ann. Epidemiol 15(7) 545–550 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Titus-Ernstoff L, Perry AE, Spencer SK, Gibson JJ, Cole BF, Ernstoff MS. Pigmentary characteristics and moles in relation to melanoma risk. Int. J. Cancer 116(1) 144–149 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Holly EA, Aston DA, Cress RD, Ahn DK, Kristiansen JJ. Cutaneous melanoma in women. II. Phenotypic characteristics and other host-related factors. Am. J. Epidemiol 141(10) 934–942 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Holly EA, Aston DA, Cress RD, Ahn DK, Kristiansen JJ. Cutaneous melanoma in women. I. Exposure to sunlight, ability to tan, and other risk factors related to ultraviolet light. Am. J. Epidemiol 141(10) 923–933 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Rees JL. The genetics of sun sensitivity in humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet 75(5) 739–751 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bevona C, Goggins W, Quinn T, Fullerton J, Tsao H. Cutaneous melanomas associated with nevi. Arch. Dermatol 139(12) 1620–1624; discussion 1624 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Goldstein AM, Tucker MA. Etiology, epidemiology, risk factors, and public health issues of melanoma. Curr. Opin. Oncol 5(2) 358–363 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Holly EA, Kelly JW, Shpall SN, Chiu SH. Number of melanocytic nevi as a major risk factor for malignant melanoma. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol 17(3) 459–468 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Garbe C, Buttner P, Weiss J et al. Associated factors in the prevalence of more than 50 common melanocytic nevi, atypical melanocytic nevi, and actinic lentigines: multicenter case-control study of the Central Malignant Melanoma Registry of the German Dermatological Society. J. Invest. Dermatol 102(5) 700–705 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Tucker MA, Halpern A, Holly EA et al. Clinically recognized dysplastic nevi. A central risk factor for cutaneous melanoma. JAMA 277(18) 1439–1444 (1997). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Swerdlow AJ, English J, Mackie RM et al. Benign melanocytic naevi as a risk factor for malignant melanoma. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 292(6535) 1555–1559 (1986). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Garbe C, Buttner P, Weiss J et al. Risk factors for developing cutaneous melanoma and criteria for identifying persons at risk: multicenter case-control study of the Central Malignant Melanoma Registry of the German Dermatological Society. J. Invest. Dermatol 102(5) 695–699 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Naldi L, Lorenzo Imberti G, Parazzini F, Gallus S, La Vecchia C. Pigmentary traits, modalities of sun reaction, history of sunburns, and melanocytic nevi as risk factors for cutaneous malignant melanoma in the Italian population: results of a collaborative case-control study. Cancer 88(12) 2703–2710 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Watt AJ, Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Risk of melanoma arising in large congenital melanocytic nevi: a systematic review. Plast. Reconstr. Surg 113(7) 1968–1974 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Purdue MP, From L, Armstrong BK et al. Etiologic and other factors predicting nevus-associated cutaneous malignant melanoma. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev 14(8) 2015–2022 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Cho E, Rosner BA, Colditz GA. Risk factors for melanoma by body site. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev 14(5) 1241–1244 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Cho E, Rosner BA, Feskanich D, Colditz GA. Risk factors and individual probabilities of melanoma for whites. J. Clin. Oncol 23(12) 2669–2675 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ford D, Bliss JM, Swerdlow AJ et al. Risk of cutaneous melanoma associated with a family history of the disease. The International Melanoma Analysis Group (IMAGE). Int. J. Cancer 62(4) 377–381 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Hemminki K, Zhang H, Czene K. Familial and attributable risks in cutaneous melanoma: effects of proband and age. J. Invest. Dermatol 120(2) 217–223 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ferrone CR, Ben Porat L, Panageas KS et al. Clinicopathological features of and risk factors for multiple primary melanomas. JAMA 294(13) 1647–1654 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Marghoob AA, Slade J, Salopek TG, Kopf AW, Bart RS, Rigel DS. Basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas are important risk factors for cutaneous malignant melanoma. Screening implications. Cancer 75(2 Suppl.), 707–714 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Meyer LJ, Zone JH. Genetics of cutaneous melanoma. J. Invest. Dermatol 103(5 Suppl.), 112S–116S (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Bishop DT, Demenais F, Goldstein AM et al. Geographical variation in the penetrance of CDKN2A mutations for melanoma. J. Natl Cancer Inst 94(12) 894–903 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Tsao H, Niendorf K. Genetic testing in hereditary melanoma. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol 51(5) 803–808 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Newton Bishop JA, Harland M, Bishop DT. The genetics of melanoma: the UK experience. Clin. Exp. Dermatol 23(4) 158–161 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Titus-Ernstoff L, Perry AE, Spencer SK et al. Multiple primary melanoma: two-year results from a population-based study. Arch. Dermatol 142(4) 433–438 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Reyes-Ortiz CA, Goodwin JS, Freeman JL. The effect of socioeconomic factors on incidence, stage at diagnosis and survival of cutaneous melanoma. Med. Sci. Monit 11(5) RA163–172 (2005). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Kirkpatrick CS, Lee JA, White E. Melanoma risk by age and socio-economic status. Int. J. Cancer 46(1) 1–4 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Mackie RM, Bray CA. Hormone replacement therapy after surgery for stage 1 or 2 cutaneous melanoma. Br. J. Cancer 90(4) 770–772 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Krieger N, Quesenberry C Jr, Peng T et al. Social class, race/ethnicity, and incidence of breast, cervix, colon, lung, and prostate cancer among Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White residents of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1988–92 (United States). Cancer Causes Control 10(6) 525–537 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Cancer Causes Control 20(4) 417–435 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Harrison RA, Haque AU, Roseman JM, Soong SJ. Socioeconomic characteristics and melanoma incidence. Annals of Epidemiology 8(5) 327–333 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Elwood JM, Whitehead SM, Davison J, Stewart M, Galt M. Malignant melanoma in England: risks associated with naevi, freckles, socialclass, hair colour, and sunburn. Int. J. Epidemiol 19(4) 801–810 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Gilchrest BA, Eller MS, Geller AC, Yaar M. The pathogenesis of melanoma induced by ultraviolet radiation. N. Engl. J. Med 340(17) 1341–1348 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Katsambas A, Nicolaidou E. Cutaneous malignant melanoma and sun exposure. Recent developments in epidemiology. Arch. Dermatol 132(4) 444–450 (1996). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Armstrong BK, Kricker A. How much melanoma is caused by sun exposure? Melanoma Res 3(6) 395–401 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Berwick M, Halpern A. Melanoma epidemiology. Curr. Opin. Oncol 9(2) 178–182 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Elwood JM, Jopson J. Melanoma and sun exposure: an overview of published studies. Int. J. Cancer 73(2) 198–203 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Lew RA, Sober AJ, Cook N, Marvell R, Fitzpatrick TB. Sun exposure habits in patients with cutaneous melanoma: a case control study. J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol 9(12) 981–986 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Westerdahl J, Olsson H, Ingvar C. At what age do sunburn episodes play a crucial role for the development of malignant melanoma. Eur. J. Cancer 30A(11), 1647–1654 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC Working Group Reports - Exposure to artificial UV radiation and skin cancer. IARC Working Group Reports - Exposure to artificial UV radiation and skin cancer (2006a). [Google Scholar]
- 104.International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). The association of use of sunbeds with cutaneous malignant melanoma and other skin cancers: A systematic review. Int. J. Cancer 120(5) 1116–1122 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Hoerster KD, Garrow RL, Mayer JA et al. Density of indoor tanning facilities in 116 large U.S. cities. Am. J. Prev. Med 36(3) 243–246 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Levine JA, Sorace M, Spencer J, Siegel DM. The indoor UV tanning industry: a review of skin cancer risk, health benefit claims, and regulation. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol 53(6) 1038–1044 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Eaton DK, Kann L, Kinchen S et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States, 2011. MMWR Surveill. Summ 61(4) 1–162 (2012). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Mackie RM, Hauschild A, Eggermont AM. Epidemiology of invasive cutaneous melanoma. Ann. Oncol 20 (Suppl. 6), vi1–7 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of indoor tanning devices by adults–United States, 2010. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep 61(18) 323–326 (2012). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Lazovich D, Sweeney C, Forster J. Prevalence of indoor tanning use in Minnesota, 2002. Arch. Dermatol 141(4) 523–524 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Autier P Perspectives in melanoma prevention: the case of sunbeds. European Journal of Cancer 40(16) 2367–2376 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Boniol M, Autier P, Boyle P, Gandini S. Cutaneous melanoma attributable to sunbed use: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 345, e4757 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Great metanalysis summarizing current evidence on tanning beds and the development of melanoma.
- 113.El Ghissassi F, Baan R, Straif K et al. A review of human carcinogens–part D: radiation. Lancet Oncol 10(8) 751–752. (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Autier P, Boniol M, Severi G, Pedeux R, Grivegnee AR, Dore JF. Sex differences in numbers of nevi on body sites of young European children: implications for the etiology of cutaneous melanoma. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev 13(12) 2003–2005 (2004). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Lazovich D, Vogel RI, Berwick M, Weinstock MA, Anderson KE, Warshaw EM. Indoor tanning and risk of melanoma: a case-control study in a highly exposed population. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev 19(6) 1557–1568 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Radiation. IARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. Risks Hum 100(Pt D), 7–303 (2012).23189752 [Google Scholar]
- 117.Hirst N, Gordon L, Gies P, Green AC. Estimation of avoidable skin cancers and cost-savings to government associated with regulation of the solarium industry in Australia. Health Policy 89(3) 303–311 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Gordon LG, Hirst NG, Gies PH, Green AC. What impact would effective solarium regulation have in Australia? Med. J. Aust 189(7) 375–378 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Gallagher RP, Spinelli JJ, Lee TK. Tanning beds, sunlamps, and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev 14(3) 562–566 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Hery C, Tryggvadottir L, Sigurdsson T et al. A melanoma epidemic in Iceland: possible influence of sunbed use. Am. J. Epidemiol 172(7) 762–767 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Cust AE, Armstrong BK, Goumas C et al. Sunbed use during adolescence and early adulthood is associated with increased risk of early-onset melanoma. Int. J. Cancer 128(10) 2425–2435 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Study highlighting the relationship between tanning bed use at early ages and the increased risk of early-onset melanoma.
- 122.Hausauer AK, Swetter SM, Cockburn MG, Clarke CA. Increases in melanoma among adolescent girls and young women in California: trends by socioeconomic status and UV radiation exposure. Arch. Dermatol 147(7) 783–789 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Boynton A, Oxlad M. Melanoma and its relationship with solarium use: health knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of young women. J. Health Psychol 16(6) 969–979 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Gosis B, Sampson BP, Seidenberg AB, Balk SJ, Gottlieb M, Geller AC. Comprehensive evaluation of indoor tanning regulations: a 50-state analysis, 2012. j. invest. dermatol doi: 10.1038/jid.2013.357 (2013) (Epub ahead of print). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Pawlak MT, Bui M, Amir M, Burkhardt DL, Chen AK, Dellavalle RP. Legislation restricting access to indoor tanning throughout the world. Arch. Dermatol 148(9) 1006–1012 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Websites
- 201.Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C and Parkin DM. GLOBOCAN 2008 v2.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; (2010). http://globocan.iarc.fr (Accessed on 3 May 2013) [Google Scholar]
- 202.Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M (Eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2010, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, USA: (based on November 2012 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER website in April 2013). http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2010/ [Google Scholar]
