Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 24;10(3):e01032-24. doi: 10.1128/msphere.01032-24

TABLE 2.

Effect of administration of LP202195 with or without FOS on the absolute abundance of LP202195 in stool samples collected post-intervention (days 14 to 60), relative to placebo or LP7 + FOS, and relative risk of high abundancea

Parameter Intervention group
Placebo LP1 LP1 + FOS LP7 LP7 + FOS
Number of samples, N 278 267 280 296 272
AAPost(14-60) of LP202195 (log10 cells/µg DNA), mean ± SE 1.86 ± 0.03 2.38 ± 0.05 2.58 ± 0.07 3.09 ± 0.07 3.15 ± 0.06
Mean difference, relative to placebo, in AA of LP202195 (log10 cells/µg DNA), (95% CI) Ref 0.53 (0.41, 0.65) 0.73 (0.59, 0.88) 1.24 (1.09, 1.38) 1.30 (1.16, 1.43)
Mean difference, relative to LP7 + FOS, in AA of LP202195 (log10 cells/µg DNA), (95% CI) NA −0.77 (−0.93, –0.60) −0.56 (−0.74, –0.38) −0.06 (−0.24, 0.12) Ref
Samples in low abundance group (i.e., AA < 3 log10 cells/µg DNA), n (%) 269 (97) 204 (76) 203 (72) 167 (56) 139 (51)
Samples in high abundance group (i.e., AA ≥ 3 log10 cells/
µg DNA), n (%)
9 (3.2) 63 (24) 77 (28) 129 (44) 133 (49)
Relative risk (RR) of high (vs low) abundance, relative to placebo (95% CI) Ref 7.1 (4.3, 11.9) 8.3 (5.0, 13.7) 13.4 (8.2, 22.0) 14.2 (8.7, 23.3)
a

AA, absolute abundance; NA, not applicable.