Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 25;20:25. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00584-9

Table 1.

Main features of the included RCTS

Study Study design Participants Outcomes Diagnostic method
Sajjad [4] RCT, single center, 180 patients All children between 5 and15 years of age of both genders admitted in the pediatric surgery emergency and having pediatric appendicitis score (PAS ≥ 7) Primary outcome: Failure of NOM PAS greater than or equal to 7
Perez Otereo [22] RCT, single center, 39 patients Patients between the ages of 6–17 years presenting with their first episode of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Inclusion criteria for uncomplicated appendicitis consisted of < 48 h of symptoms, WBC < l8,000 µL, temperature < 103• Fahrenheit, appendix diameter < 11 mm, and radiographic absence of perforation or abscess on ultrasound and/or computed tomography (CT). Presence of an appendicolith did not exclude patients from eligibility Primary outcomes: one–year success rate of antibiotics-alone and QOL measures assessed 1 month post discharge. Secondary outcome: length of stay and readmission rate Abdominal US in 31 patients, while 5 patients were diagnosed solely by CT scan, and 3 were evaluated by both Imaging modalities when ultrasound was inconclusive
Svensson [21] RCT, single center, 50 patients All children between 5 and15 years of age of both genders admitted in the pediatric surgery emergency Primary outcome: proportion of children in each group achieving •resolution of symptoms without significant complications”; Secondary outcomes: time from randomization to discharge, complications (wound infection, wound dehiscence, diarrhea, etc.), and recurrent appendicitis within 1 year of randomization The diagnosis was made with the combination of clinical findings and imaging. All children underwent abdominal ultrasound scan, and a computed tomographic (CT) scan was performed when there was diagnostic: uncertainty
Study Intervention Surgical approach Age OM Age NOM CRP OM (mg/L) CRP NOM (mg/L) Follow-up
Sajjad [4] Intravenous meropenem (10 mg/kg/dose intravenous infusion 8 hourly) and metronidazole (20 mg/kg/day intravenous divided doses 8 hourly) for at least 48 h. Once the child started tolerating oral intake and clinically improved, the treatment was changed to oral ciprofloxacin (10 mg/kg/dose twice daily) and metronidazole (20 mg/"q./day two divided doses) for another 8 days Not specified 10.11 ± 1.83 9.56 ± 1.82 7.79 ± 1.76 7.77 ± 1.8 1 Year
Perez Otero [22] Intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam for 24–48 h followed by 10 days of oral ciprofloxacin and metronidazole Laparoscopic 9.7 (7.3–14.4) 10.2 (8.5–11.1) 12.5 (5.0–41) 9.6 (3.3–22) 1 Year
Svensson [21]

Days 1–2: IV meropenem (10 mg/kg × 3 per 24 h) plus metronidazole {20 mg/kg × 1 per 24 h)

Days 3–10: PO ciprofloxacin (20 mg/kg × 2 per 24 h) and metronidazole (20 mg/kg × 1 per 24 h)

Laparoscopic 11.1 (6.2–14.8) 12.2 (5.9–15.0) 27.0 (1.0–175.0) 30.5 (1.0–185.0) 1 Year