Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 11;11:e53539. doi: 10.2196/53539

Table 1.

Breast cancer trial cost-utility analysis.


Intervention group (n=74) Control group (n=75)



Mean (SD) Mean (SD) P value t test (df)a 95% CI
Health utility





QALYsb,c –0.004 (0.002) –0.012 (0.002) <.001 80 (1998) 0.0074-0.0078

Incremental QALYsb 0.0076 (0.003) N/Ad N/A N/A N/A
Costs (€e)





Intervention costs 92 (2) N/A N/A N/A N/A
All health care costs (€)





Outpatient 27,571 (6392) 26,348 (5800) N/A N/A N/A

Inpatient 9207 (5254) 9093 (5460) N/A N/A N/A

Total 36,882 (1032) 35,427 (959) <.001 33 (1987) 33,530-37,351

Incrementalb 1454 (1386) N/A N/A N/A N/A
Acute health care costs (€)





Outpatient 554 (597) 562 (606) N/A N/A N/A

Inpatient 2932 (4023) 2665 (3992) N/A N/A N/A

Total 3585 (480) 3235 (494) <.001 16 (1998) 2242-4214

Incrementalb 353 (676) N/A N/A N/A N/A
ICERab,f 202,368 (811,136) N/A N/A N/A 152,008-252,728
ICERbb 49,903 (207,042) N/A N/A N/A 37,049-62,758
ICERcb 13,213 (33,327) N/A N/A N/A 11,145-15,281

aIndependent unpaired samples Student t test (2-tailed).

bBased on bootstrap.

cQALY: quality-adjusted life year.

dN/A: not applicable.

e€1=US $1.03.

fICER: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.