Table 2.
Paired sample t test of best fit alignment and manual n-point + global registration in the mandible (n = 12)
| mean (M ± SD) | Paired difference (M ± SD) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best fit alignment | Manual + Global Registration | t | df | Sig.(two-side) | ||
| RMS(mm) | 0.727 ± 0.253 | 0.549 ± 0.147 | 0.178 ± 0.337 | 1.179 | 11 | 0.304 |
| Avg. positive deviation(mm) | 0.384 ± 0.102 | 0.356 ± 0.115 | 0.028 ± 0.112 | 0.566 | 11 | 0.602 |
| Avg. negative deviation(mm) | -0.189 ± 0.042 | -0.164 ± 0.260 | 0.025 ± 0.295 | 0.190 | 11 | 0.859 |
| Nominal value (mm) | ±(0.183 ± 0.012) | |||||
| Nominal value proportion (%) | 44.16 ± 13.07 | 66.27 ± 5.81 | -22.11 ± 11.93 | -4.144 | 11 | 0.014* |
Note: * P < 0.05. In the nominal value threshold proportion, there was a statistically significant difference between the two registration methods