Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 26;29(4):207. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06187-7

Table 2.

Paired sample t test of best fit alignment and manual n-point + global registration in the mandible (n = 12)

mean (M ± SD) Paired difference
(M ± SD)
Best fit alignment Manual + Global Registration t df Sig.(two-side)
RMS(mm) 0.727 ± 0.253 0.549 ± 0.147 0.178 ± 0.337 1.179 11 0.304
Avg. positive deviation(mm) 0.384 ± 0.102 0.356 ± 0.115 0.028 ± 0.112 0.566 11 0.602
Avg. negative deviation(mm) -0.189 ± 0.042 -0.164 ± 0.260 0.025 ± 0.295 0.190 11 0.859
Nominal value (mm) ±(0.183 ± 0.012)
Nominal value proportion (%) 44.16 ± 13.07 66.27 ± 5.81 -22.11 ± 11.93 -4.144 11 0.014*

Note: * P < 0.05. In the nominal value threshold proportion, there was a statistically significant difference between the two registration methods