Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 27;21:210. doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04670-7

Table 4.

Morphological traits and relative asymmetry (RA) of bilateral morphological lengts of male broiler chicks exposed to in ovo L- carnitine injection

Chick length Body mass index Head diameter Beak length Face laength Middle toe length Shank length RA of bilateral lengts
cm g/cm2 mm mm mm mm mm Face Middle toe Shank
Day, 0
 C 17.82 ± 0.13 0.15 ± 0.00 17.29 ± 0.32 6.40 ± 0.13a 14.15 ± 0.20a 16.00 ± 0.23a 17.38 ± 0.24 1.47 ± 0.45 1.72 ± 0.05 1.58 ± 0.26a
 IOPW 17.94 ± 0.13 0.14 ± 0.00 16.46 ± 0.31 5.86 ± 0.12b 13.03 ± 0.19b 14.41 ± 0.21b 17.00 ± 0.23 1.22 ± 0.42 2.33 ± 0.47 0.61 ± 0.25b
 IOPW + L-car 17.78 ± 0.13 0.15 ± 0.00 16.72 ± 0.31 5.94 ± 0.14b 12.81 ± 0.19b 13.72 ± 0.21c 16.79 ± 0.22 1.48 ± 0.42 2.23 ± 0.47 0.86 ± 0.25ab
P value 0.683 0.116 0.203 0.012 0.002 0.001 0.212 0.888 647 0.052
Day, 3
 C 22.38 ± 0.35a 0.17 ± 0.01 18.72 ± 0.24 6.73 ± 0.09 13.79 ± 0.18 16.36 ± 0.30a 20.22 ± 0.13 0.96 ± 0.03 0.76 ± 0.02 0.73 ± 0.02
 IOPW 20.62 ± 0.35b 0.17 ± 0.01 18.60 ± 0.34 6.33 ± 0.13 13.78 ± 0.25 15.18 ± 0.42b 19.71 ± 0.18 1.01 ± 0.05 0.64 ± 0.03 0.82 ± 0.02
 IOPW + L-car 21.20 ± 0.35b 0.18 ± 0.01 18.88 ± 0.34 6.62 ± 0.13 14.24 ± 0.25 15.09 ± 0.42b 20.02 ± 0.18 1.39 ± 0.04 0.98 ± 0.03 0.75 ± 0.02
P value 0.011 0.695 0.846 0.085 0.316 0.034 0.109 0.749 0.762 0.964
Day, 7
 C 26.36 ± 0.34 0.26 ± 0.01 20.25 ± 0.38 8.08 ± 0.15 15.19 ± 0.26 20.09 ± 0.29 23.54 ± 0.22 1.08 ± 0.03a 0.68 ± 0.02 0.32 ± 0.02
 IOPW 25.67 ± 0.38 0.24 ± 0.01 20.33 ± 0.42 8.27 ± 0.15 14.51 ± 0.26 19.62 ± 0.33 23.07 ± 0.22 0.83 ± 0.03b 0.77 ± 0.02 0.47 ± 0.02
 IOPW + L-car 26.10 ± 0.34 0.24 ± 0.01 19.78 ± 0.38 8.06 ± 0.15 15.31 ± 0.26 20.45 ± 0.29 23.54 ± 0.22 0.41 ± 0.03c 0.59 ± 0.02 0.74 ± 0.02
P value 0.438 0.413 0.579 0.607 0.147 0.219 0.306 0.032 0.567 0.292

abcDifferent superscript means differ significantly p < 0.05

Control, non—injection group, IOPW In ovo pure water injection group, IOPW + L-car In ovo L-carnitine injection group added pure water