Skip to main content
FEMS Microbes logoLink to FEMS Microbes
. 2025 Mar 3;6:xtaf003. doi: 10.1093/femsmc/xtaf003

The importance of translational research in the study of ocular toxoplasmosis: insights from the 17th International Congress on Toxoplasmosis 2024

Alejandra de-la-Torre 1,2,, Germán Mejía-Salgado 3,4,5, Gereon Schares 6,
PMCID: PMC11951098  PMID: 40160412

Abstract

Toxoplasmosis is a parasitic infection with significant implications for human health, particularly in its ocular form, which can lead to severe visual impairment. While both basic and clinical research have made considerable strides in understanding the biology and treatment of this parasite, challenges remain. Recent advancements in diagnostics, mainly through multimodal imaging, have improved the identification of active disease and predicting outcomes. Experimental therapies are also emerging, offering new hope for more effective treatments. However, the most critical insight from recent research, particularly emphasized at the 17th International Congress on Toxoplasmosis, is the necessity of a collaborative approach. Integrating basic and clinical research is essential for translating molecular and pathophysiological findings into effective clinical practices. This synergy is crucial for advancing treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes in ocular toxoplasmosis.

Keywords: Toxoplasma gondii, virulence, population structure, clinical research, ocular immune privilege, recurrent toxoplasmosis


Toxoplasmosis is a parasitic infection with significant impacts on human health, particularly in its ocular form and advances in the diagnosis and treatment of ocular toxoplasmosis are urgently needed.

Introduction

Toxoplasmosis is a parasitic infection affecting humans and other animal vertebrate species. It is estimated that one-third of the world's human population is chronically infected, with up to 80% of these individuals remaining asymptomatic (Park and Nam 2013). Infection occurs congenitally or through ingesting undercooked, infected meat, contaminated vegetables, or water (Goh et al. 2023). Ocular involvement is a notable consequence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in 2%–18% of cases, resulting in irreversible retinochoroidal scars, often recurrent episodes, and complications that can threaten vision (Jones and Holland 2010). These complications include vitreous opacities, epiretinal membranes, choroidal neovascularization, and retinal detachment, among others (Park and Nam 2013, Goh et al. 2023). Notably, T. gondii is recognized as the leading cause of posterior uveitis worldwide. Since its discovery in tissue cysts in 1908 within the gundi (a hamster-like rodent), extensive research has positioned T. gondii among the most thoroughly studied parasites (Dubey 2008).

Advances in understanding T. gondii population structure and virulence factors as base for new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in ocular toxoplasmosis

The biological study of T. gondii has progressed significantly, starting from basic morphological knowledge to an advanced understanding of its life cycle and genotypic variations. Initial studies focused on the morphology of different stages of the parasite. First identified by Nicolle and Manceaux (1908) in the gundi, tachyzoites are lunate and proliferative forms multiplying by endodyogeny (Goldman et al. 1958). In the retina, tachyzoites produce the active form of ocular toxoplasmosis, “retinochoroiditis,” observed as yellowish creamy lesions (Goh et al. 2023).

In contrast, bradyzoites, the encysted stage in tissues, were later characterized by their resistance to gastric digestion and their crucial role in the parasite's life cycle, allowing hosts to become infected through ingesting infected meat (Dubey and Frenkel 1976). In the retina, bradyzoites remain encysted in the retinal cells upon active lesion resolution. They can be the source of further reactivation when they change to their active form, the tachyzoite (Goh et al. 2023). These findings established that retinal cysts are integral to the life cycle of T. gondii, independent of host immunity (Ferguson and Hutchison 1987, Dubey et al. 1998).

Over the past decades, advancements have led to the identification of different T. gondii genotypes and partially also their associated infection profiles. In Northern America and Europe, the parasite classically comprises three major clonal lineages based on virulence in mouse experimental models: type I, II, III, and atypical (Howe and Sibley 1995, Fernández-Escobar et al. 2022). Type I strains are highly virulent and often associated with laboratory mouse death. In contrast, type II strains are less virulent and represent the most common cause of human infections in these regions. Type III strains were regarded as the least virulent, frequently found in domesticated and wild animals but less commonly in humans (Howe and Sibley 1995, Grigg et al. 2001, Fernández-Escobar et al. 2022). However, more recent studies suggested only marginal differences in the prevalence of particular genotypes in various compartments (i.e. humans, domestic animals, wild animals, and environment) for Europe (Fernández-Escobar et al. 2022). Moreover, previous and more recent studies have observed exceptions from the initial virulence characteristics of clonal types, especially for type III strains (Khan et al. 2009, Taniguchi et al. 2018, Fernández-Escobar et al. 2022).

The worldwide T. gondii population structure is very complex, and the phylogenetic analysis of several hundreds of typed isolates worldwide revealed 15 well-defined haplogroups (Su et al. 2012). More recent whole genome sequencing analyses identified 16 haplogroups assorted into six major clades (Lorenzi et al. 2016). The highest genetic diversity in T. gondii is observed in South America, suggesting that T. gondii may have evolved on this continent and has spread worldwide (Bertranpetit et al. 2017). Several evolutionary bottlenecks, including the predominance of domestic cats as the definitive host (Galal et al. 2022) and commensal rodent species as intermediate hosts (Shwab et al. 2018, Galal et al. 2022), most likely led to the clonal population structure observed in Europe and North America.

Differences in the expression of various virulence factors, which are at least partially the effect of the above-mentioned genotypic differences, may result in differences in the severity of disease manifestations in mice and probably also humans and other intermediate hosts (Sanchez and Besteiro 2021). It was hypothesized that the genotype of an infecting T. gondii strain is one of the factors influencing the disease outcome, including ocular toxoplasmosis (Xiao and Yolken 2015). This strain hypothesis is one of the possible explanations for why T. gondii is the most frequent cause of posterior uveitis in Latin America because of the highly diverse population structure of the parasite in this region. However, direct typing of T. gondii in the case of ocular toxoplasmosis appears challenging due to the usually very limited sample volume of aqueous or vitreous humor and the low T. gondii DNA concentrations in these analytes (Fekkar et al. 2008, 2011).

Further research is necessary to improve the direct typing of T. gondii in cases of ocular toxoplasmosis to better understand the parasite genotype's effect on the severity of ocular toxoplasmosis. Recent advances to standardize T. gondii genotyping represent important prerequisites for reliable direct typing (Joeres et al. 2023, 2024). Indirect typing of T. gondii causing ocular infection, i.e. serotyping, appears to be an alternative tool (Mantilla-Muriel et al. 2020), and recent attempts to improve this methodology presented at the 17th International Congress on Toxoplasmosis 2024 appear promising if a translation to human toxoplasmosis is possible (Arranz-Solís et al. 2024).

The rhoptry proteins ROP16 and ROP18, secreted by the parasite upon infection, seem to play pivotal roles in modulating the host immune response. ROP16 phosphorylates host STAT3 and STAT6 transcription factors, altering cytokine profiles and repressing interleukin (IL) 12 signaling necessary for interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production, which is crucial for the host's survival during infection (Yamamoto et al. 2009, Ong et al. 2010, Hernández-de-los-Ríos et al. 2019). Conversely, ROP18 interferes with host immunity-related GTPases, preventing their interaction with the parasitophorous vacuole membrane, thus aiding the parasite in evading the host's immune system (Steinfeldt et al. 2010). These virulence factors significantly impact the clinical outcomes of T. gondii infections, particularly regarding cytokine production and the host's ability to control the infection, as shown in rodent models (Rochet et al. 2019). Which role the rhoptry proteins ROP18 and ROP16 play in ocular toxoplasmosis is not entirely clear. In a cohort of Colombian patients with ocular toxoplasmosis, a higher inflammatory reaction on the eye was associated with the lack of the upstream region of ROP18 which is in line with a mouse virulent ROP18 allele (Sánchez et al. 2014). However, in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from individuals with chronic infection (predominantly ocular toxoplasmosis patients), the production of proinflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ and IL-1b did not seem to be influenced by ROP16 or ROP18 proteins, but by the host's polymorphisms in cytokine genes (Hernández-de-los-Ríos et al. 2019). This indicates that the genetic susceptibility of humans as intermediate hosts may play an important role for the development of ocular toxoplasmosis (Fernández et al. 2016).

In addition to ROP16 and ROP18, T. gondii contains and secretes many more rhoptry proteins which are most likely essential in mediating invasion of host cells and host-pathogen interactions (Fernández et al. 2016), as also illustrated by the results of a BioID approach presented at the 17th International Congress on Toxoplasmosis by Stevens et al. (Seeber et al. 2024a, 2024b). Other approaches like CRISPR screens identified further genes essential for invasion, replication, egress, host-parasite interactions, and virulence of T. gondii (Butterworth et al. 2023, Tachibana et al. 2023, 2024, Tachibana and Yamamoto 2025), notably further rhoptry but also dense granule (GRA) and microneme (MIC) genes as illustrated by presentations given by Torelli et al. and Tachibana et al. at the 17th International Congress on Toxoplasmosis, respectively (Seeber et al. 2024a, 2024b). Despite these advances, the specific roles of these newly identified proteins and those previously characterized in the pathogenesis of ocular toxoplasmosis remain largely unexplored. Addressing these questions in future translational studies is crucial for advancing our understanding of the disease.

A deeper understanding of T. gondii infection has advanced therapeutic approaches beyond the conventional regimen of pyrimethamine and sulfonamides with or without systemic glucocorticoids (Goh et al. 2023). Experimental therapies, such as exosomes and TgMyoA-targeted treatments, show promise. Exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells have demonstrated potential in reducing leukocyte infiltration and alleviating uveitis by modulating Th1/Th17 immune responses in T. gondii-induced uveitis (Sauer et al. 2012, Bai et al. 2017). Additionally, targeting the MyoA motility complex of T. gondii, crucial for parasite movement and invasion, has shown potential, with compounds like KNX-002 inhibiting TgMyoA ATPase activity (Trivedi et al. 2020). While still under investigation, these advanced therapies offer promising avenues for treating ocular toxoplasmosis.

Clinical research advances

Clinical studies have complemented molecular research by providing crucial epidemiological diagnostics and therapeutic insights. A higher prevalence of T. gondii infection, recurrence, and more extensive lesions with greater vision impairment due to macular involvement (Fig. 1) have been observed in South American patients (Cifuentes-González et al. 2023a, Karami et al. 2024). This is attributed to the higher prevalence of type I and atypical strains in the Southern Hemisphere compared to Northern countries (Pfaff et al. 2014). Additionally, studies have identified key infection sources specific to different populations. In Colombia, water has been identified as the most contaminated source (Triviño-Valencia et al. 2016), whereas pork is the primary-contaminated meat (Medina Hernández et al. 2022). In contrast, in Australia, lamb is the most contaminated meat (Dawson et al. 2020). Differentiating infection sources for each population is essential for prioritizing governmental measures, such as improving water supply systems, enforcing stricter food safety regulations, and implementing rigorous screening programs for at-risk populations, including pregnant women, who should ideally undergo monthly serological testing (Gómez-Marín et al. 2007).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Macular retinochoroidal scar. Fundus photography shows the retina, the optic disc (circle at the left side), and an extensive retinochoroidal scar (circle in the centre) secondary to Toxoplasma gondii infection in the macula, the area responsible for detailed and color vision.

For diagnosis, the application of multimodal imaging techniques such as color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (AF), fluorescein angiography (FFA), and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) has advanced the ability to assess and monitor ocular toxoplasmosis (Brandão-de-Resende et al. 2020). In SD-OCT, signs like hyperreflective vitreous dots (80%), thickened (65%) and hyperreflective (61%) retina, choroidal thickening (55%) and hyporeflectivity (61%), and deposits (36%), and posterior hyaloid thickening (35%) indicate active disease and the consequent need for treatment (Oliver et al. 2022). In addition, some imaging findings could predict visual prognosis. For instance, retinal hyporeflective spaces, indicative of liquefactive necrosis, were significantly associated with poorer visual acuity outcomes (20/200 or worse) upon lesion resolution​ (Oliver et al. 2022).

For treatment, clinical research has enabled us to identify at least 24 treatment protocols with no statistically significant differences in outcomes. This diversity in treatment strategies (systemic or intravitreal) has allowed clinicians to tailor therapy based on specific patient factors, allergies to sulfa drugs, adverse reactions, and whether the infection is bilateral or unilateral, among others (Feliciano-Alfonso et al. 2021). A significant advancement in recent decades has been the discovery of the efficacy of prophylactic therapy, which has shown a reduction in recurrence rates by 83% during the first year and 87% during the second year compared to placebo (Cifuentes-González et al. 2023a). Additionally, economic analyses have identified trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as the most cost-effective therapy for managing ocular toxoplasmosis. Notably, there is still more to investigate (Álvarez-García et al. 2021). At the 17th International Congress on Toxoplasmosis, Braun et al. proposed the integration of phenotypic screening with forward genetic approaches as a promising and powerful workflow in the search for effective antiparasitic drugs (Seeber et al. 2024b). In addition, further potential drug targets were reported, e.g. by using genomic approaches to identify Toxoplasma-specific targets (Seeber et al. 2024a). Knowledge of putative drugs or drug targets may lead to the development of novel chemotherapeutic approaches for managing ocular toxoplasmosis.

Summary of key findings on ocular toxoplasmosis reported at the 17th International Congress on Toxoplasmosis

Recent studies presented at the 17th International Congress on Toxoplasmosis provided significant insights into the pathophysiology and clinical management of ocular toxoplasmosis, particularly emphasizing novel mechanisms and clinical correlations.

Taghavi Eraghi et al. highlighted the role of immunosenescence and inflammaging in ocular toxoplasmosis. A retrospective analysis of 290 patients revealed that older age was associated with poorer baseline visual acuity, larger retinal lesions, and increased inflammatory activity (Eraghi et al. 2024). These findings underline the declining local humoral immune response (antibody index) with age, aligning with age-related immune modulation concepts. Moreover, in 24.3% of cases, macular involvement was linked to severe complications such as retinal detachment and poor visual outcomes (Eraghi et al. 2024). This study emphasizes the need to consider age and lesion location in diagnosing and managing ocular toxoplasmosis (Eraghi et al. 2024).

Geiller et al. demonstrated the pivotal role of PD-L1 in maintaining ocular immune privilege. In vitro and murine models showed that T. gondii infection alters PD-L1 expression in retinal epithelial cells, potentially modulating T-cell activity and inflammation. These findings suggest a dynamic interplay between the parasite and host immune checkpoints, providing a basis for targeted immunomodulatory therapies in ocular toxoplasmosis (Seeber et al. 2024a, 2024b).

Donizete da Silva et al. identified miR-511–5p as a potential biomarker for ocular toxoplasmosis. Elevated levels of this microRNA were associated with higher intraocular pressure in patients with active ocular toxoplasmosis lesions, suggesting its involvement in the pathogenesis of ocular toxoplasmosis. These findings could pave the way for novel prognostic tools and therapeutic strategies targeting microRNA pathways (Seeber et al. 2024a, 2024b).

Lijeskić et al. reported cases of recurrent ocular toxoplasmosis following SARS-CoV-2 infection, suggesting that the altered cytokine milieu during COVID-19 may trigger reactivation of T. gondii cysts. Their findings stress the importance of ophthalmologic evaluation in patients with a history of ocular toxoplasmosis and recent SARS-CoV-2 exposure, irrespective of COVID-19 symptomatology (Seeber et al. 2024a, 2024b).

One of the plenary lectures at the congress, delivered by de-la-Torre, focused on the topic “Ocular Toxoplasmosis: Myths and Realities.” De-la-Torre emphasized the significance of varying clinical presentations of ocular toxoplasmosis based on geographic origin. She highlighted that these differences are likely linked to the virulence of specific T. gondii strains (de-la-Torre et al. 2013) and genetic polymorphisms in the host (Naranjo-Galvis et al. 2018, 2023), which elicit distinct intraocular and peripheral immune responses. Notably, parasite and host factors cannot be considered separately since they are interdependent (Kalogeropoulos et al. 2022).

The lecture also underscored the importance of prophylactic treatment in preventing recurrences of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis (Silveira et al. 2002; Cifuentes-González et al. 2023b) and using intravitreal antibiotics as adjuvant therapy for refractory cases with vision-threatening central lesions (Feliciano-Alfonso et al. 2019). Furthermore, de-la-Torre detailed the critical role of advanced imaging modalities, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography (OCT-A), FFA, and AF, in the diagnostic workup of atypical cases of ocular toxoplasmosis (Invernizzi et al. 2018, Brandão-de-Resende et al. 2020).

Conclusion

Although significant knowledge has been gained since the discovery of T. gondii, much remains to be done. Future research should address the disruption of IFN-γ-signaling by South American strains and explore the possibility of therapies, e.g. to boost IFN-γ production, such as CD4+ memory T-cell stimulation. Developing immune-based interventions and chemotherapeutics capable of penetrating tissue cysts in intraocular tissues is critical, alongside identifying drugs specifically designed to eliminate these cysts. Additionally, personalized medicine approaches should evaluate differential therapeutic responses based on host susceptibility and the genetic diversity of T. gondii strains. These strategies require integrated basic and clinical research to advance effective treatments for ocular toxoplasmosis, as neither group can accomplish this alone. Strengthening translational research is essential, so clinical findings can inform basic research, and insights into molecular and pathophysiological pathways can become relevant for clinicians.

This was one of the central themes of the 17th International Congress on Toxoplasmosis 2024 (Seeber et al. 2024a, 2024b), where specific examples highlighted the necessity of integrative efforts. For instance, geographic variations in clinical presentations of ocular toxoplasmosis linked to strain virulence and host genetic polymorphisms were emphasized. The importance of prophylactic treatment and advanced imaging modalities for diagnosis were underscored. Additionally, studies on age-related immune changes highlighted the impact of immunosenescence and inflammaging on disease severity. An altered cytokine milieu as the underlying cause for the reactivation of T. gondii cysts causing recurrent ocular toxoplasmosis following SARS-CoV-2 infection may also apply for other virus infections and needs further investigation. The identification of microRNA 511–5p as a potential biomarker for disease activity in ocular toxoplasmosis may trigger research on further microRNAs as useful diagnostic or prognostic markers. The identification of new drug targets and the establishment of novel workflow in the search for effective antiparasitic drugs may lead to the identification of novel chemotherapeutics, potentially suitable for treatment in ocular toxoplasmosis. These examples illustrate how multidisciplinary research and clinical collaborations are essential to advancing our understanding and improving patient outcomes in ocular toxoplasmosis.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the organizers of the 17th International Congress on Toxoplasmosis for their outstanding efforts in bringing together experts from around the world. Their dedication to fostering collaboration and advancing research in this critical field has been invaluable. This congress provided the necessary platform for the exchange of ideas and the promotion of translational research, which is essential for improving outcomes in ocular toxoplasmosis.

Contributor Information

Alejandra de-la-Torre, Neuroscience Research Group (NEUROS), Neurovitae Center for Neuroscience, Institute of Translational Medicine (IMT), Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá 110321, Colombia; Ophthalmology Interest Group Universidad del Rosario (OIG UR), Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota 110321, Colombia.

Germán Mejía-Salgado, Neuroscience Research Group (NEUROS), Neurovitae Center for Neuroscience, Institute of Translational Medicine (IMT), Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá 110321, Colombia; Ophthalmology Interest Group Universidad del Rosario (OIG UR), Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota 110321, Colombia; Health Sciences Faculty, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB, Bucaramanga 680003, Colombia.

Gereon Schares, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Institute of Epidemiology, National Reference Laboratory for Toxoplasmosis, 17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from public, commercial, or not-for-profit funding agencies.

References

  1. Álvarez-García  V, Rubio-Romero  L, Maldonado  MA  et al.  Ocular toxoplasmosis in immunocompetent adults: current cost-effectiveness of four treatment regimens in Colombia. Heliyon. 2021;7:e08265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arranz-Solís  D, Tana  LR, Tejerina-de-Uribe  E  et al.  A combination of GRA3, GRA6 and GRA7 peptides offer a useful tool for serotyping type II and III Toxoplasma gondii infections in sheep and pigs. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024;14:1384393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bai  L, Shao  H, Wang  H  et al.  Effects of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes on experimental autoimmune uveitis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:4323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertranpetit  E, Jombart  T, Paradis  E  et al.  Phylogeography of Toxoplasma gondii points to a South American origin. Infect Genet Evol. 2017;48:150–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brandão-de-Resende  C, Balasundaram  MB, Narain  S  et al.  Multimodal imaging in ocular toxoplasmosis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2020;28:1196–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Butterworth  S, Kordova  K, Chandrasekaran  S  et al.  High-throughput identification of Toxoplasma gondii effector proteins that target host cell transcription. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31:1748–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cifuentes-González  C, Rojas-Carabali  W, Pérez  ÁO  et al.  Risk factors for recurrences and visual impairment in patients with ocular toxoplasmosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hwang  D-K (ed.), PLoS One. 2023a;18:e0283845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cifuentes-González  C, Rojas-Carabali  W, Pérez  ÁO  et al.  Risk factors for recurrences and visual impairment in patients with ocular toxoplasmosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hwang  D-K (ed.), PLoS One. 2023b;18:e0283845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dawson  AC, Ashander  LM, Appukuttan  B  et al.  Lamb as a potential source of Toxoplasma gondii infection for Australians. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2020;44:49–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. de-la-Torre  A, Sauer  A, Pfaff  AW  et al.  Severe South American ocular toxoplasmosis is associated with decreased Ifn-γ/Il-17a and increased Il-6/Il-13 intraocular levels. Jardim  A (ed.), PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dubey  JP, Frenkel  JK. Feline toxoplasmosis from acutely infected mice and the development of toxoplasma cysts*. J Protozool. 1976;23:537–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dubey  JP, Lindsay  DS, Speer  CA. Structures of Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites, bradyzoites, and sporozoites and biology and development of tissue cysts. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:267–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dubey  JP. The history of Toxoplasma gondii—the first 100 years. J Eukaryotic Microbiology. 2008;55:467–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eraghi  AT, Garweg  JG, Pleyer  U. The role of age in ocular toxoplasmosis: clinical signs of immunosenescence and inflammaging. Front Med. 2024;11:1311145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fekkar  A, Ajzenberg  D, Bodaghi  B  et al.  Direct genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii in ocular fluid samples from 20 patients with ocular toxoplasmosis: predominance of type II in France. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:1513–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fekkar  A, Bodaghi  B, Touafek  F  et al.  Comparison of immunoblotting, calculation of the Goldmann-Witmer coefficient, and real-time PCR using aqueous humor samples for diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1965–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Feliciano-Alfonso  JE, Muñoz-Ortiz  J, Marín-Noriega  MA  et al.  Safety and efficacy of different antibiotic regimens in patients with ocular toxoplasmosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2021;10:206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Feliciano-Alfonso  JE, Vargas-Villanueva  A, Marín  MA  et al.  Antibiotic treatment for ocular toxoplasmosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis: study protocol. Syst Rev. 2019;8:146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ferguson  DJP, Hutchison  WM. An ultrastructural study of the early development and tissue cyst formation of Toxoplasma gondii in the brains of mice. Parasitol Res. 1987;73:483–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fernández  C, Jaimes  J, Ortiz  MC  et al.  Host and Toxoplasma gondii genetic and non-genetic factors influencing the development of ocular toxoplasmosis: a systematic review. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;44:199–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fernández-Escobar  M, Schares  G, Maksimov  P  et al.  Toxoplasma gondii genotyping: a closer look into Europe. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:842595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Galal  L, Ariey  F, Gouilh  MA  et al.  A unique Toxoplasma gondii haplotype accompanied the global expansion of cats. Nat Commun. 2022;13:5778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Goh  EJH, Putera  I, La Distia Nora  R  et al.  Ocular toxoplasmosis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2023;31:1342–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Goldman  M, Carver  RK, Sulzer  AJ. Reproduction of Toxoplasma gondii by internal budding. J Parasitol. 1958;44:161–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gómez-Marín  J, Ruiz  B, Pedro  S  et al.  Guía de práctica clínica para toxoplasmosisdurante el embarazo y toxoplasmosis congénitaen Colombia. 2007.
  26. Grigg  ME, Ganatra  J, Boothroyd  JC  et al.  Unusual abundance of atypical strains associated with human ocular toxoplasmosis. J INFECT DIS. 2001;184:633–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hernández-de-los-Ríos  A, Murillo-Leon  M, Mantilla-Muriel  LE  et al.  Influence of two major Toxoplasma gondii virulence factors (ROP16 and ROP18) on the immune response of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to human toxoplasmosis infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Howe  DK, Sibley  LD. Toxoplasma gondii comprises three clonal lineages: correlation of parasite genotype with human disease. J Infect Dis. 1995;172:1561–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Invernizzi  A, Agarwal  AK, Ravera  V  et al.  Comparing optical coherence tomography findings in different aetiologies of infectious necrotising retinitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102:433–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Joeres  M, Cardron  G, Passebosc-Faure  K  et al.  A ring trial to harmonize Toxoplasma gondii microsatellite typing: comparative analysis of results and recommendations for optimization. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023;42:803–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Joeres  M, Maksimov  P, Höper  D  et al.  Genotyping of European Toxoplasma gondii strains by a new high-resolution next-generation sequencing-based method. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024;43:355–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jones  JL, Holland  GN. Annual burden of ocular toxoplasmosis in the US. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;82:464–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kalogeropoulos  D, Kalogeropoulos  C, Sakkas  H  et al.  Pathophysiological aspects of ocular toxoplasmosis: host-parasite interactions. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2022;30:560–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Karami  M, Gorgani-Firouzjaee  T, Rostami-Mansour  S  et al.  Prevalence of ocular toxoplasmosis in the general population and uveitis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2024;32:1003–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Khan  A, Taylor  S, Ajioka  JW  et al.  Selection at a single locus leads to widespread expansion of Toxoplasma gondii lineages that are virulent in mice. Gojobori  T (ed.), PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lorenzi  H, Khan  A, Behnke  MS  et al.  Local admixture of amplified and diversified secreted pathogenesis determinants shapes mosaic Toxoplasma gondii genomes. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mantilla-Muriel  LE, Hernández-de-los-Ríos  A, Rincón  M  et al.  Serotyping, host genes and cytokines response in human ocular toxoplasmosis. Microb Pathog. 2020;148:104465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Medina Hernández  JD, Osorio Delgado  LA, Zabala Gonzalez  D  et al.  Detección molecular de Toxoplasma gondii en carnes para consumo humano en Ibagué, Colombia. Biomedica. 2022;42:136–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Naranjo-Galvis  CA, de-la-Torre  A, Mantilla-Muriel  LE  et al.  Genetic polymorphisms in cytokine genes in Colombian patients with ocular toxoplasmosis. Adams  JH (ed.), Infect Immun. 2018;86:e00597–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Naranjo-Galvis  CA, McLeod  R, Gómez-Marín  JE  et al.  Genetic variations in the purinergic P2×7 receptor are associated with the immune response to ocular toxoplasmosis in Colombia. Microorganisms. 2023;11:2508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nicolle  C, Manceaux  L. Sur une infection à corps de Leishman (ou organismes voisins) du gundi. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences. 1908;147:763–766. [Google Scholar]
  42. Oliver  GF, Ferreira  LB, Vieira  BR  et al.  Posterior segment findings by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and clinical associations in active toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis. Sci Rep. 2022;12:1156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ong  Y-C, Reese  ML, Boothroyd  JC. Toxoplasma Rhoptry Protein 16 (ROP16) subverts host function by direct tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT6. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:28731–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Park  Y-H, Nam  H-W. Clinical features and treatment of ocular toxoplasmosis. Korean J Parasitol. 2013;51:393–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pfaff  AW, de-la-Torre  A, Rochet  E  et al.  New clinical and experimental insights into Old World and neotropical ocular toxoplasmosis. Int J Parasitol. 2014;44:99–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rochet  E, Argy  N, Greigert  V  et al.  Type I ROP16 regulates retinal inflammatory responses during ocular toxoplasmosis. Hakimi  MA (ed.), PLoS One. 2019;14:e0214310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sanchez  SG, Besteiro  S. The pathogenicity and virulence of Toxoplasma gondii. Virulence. 2021;12:3095–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sánchez  V, de-la-Torre  A, Gómez-Marín  JE. Characterization of ROP18 alleles in human toxoplasmosis. Parasitol Int. 2014;63:463–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sauer  A, Pfaff  AW, Villard  O  et al.  Interleukin 17A as an effective target for anti-inflammatory and antiparasitic treatment of toxoplasmic uveitis. J Infect Dis. 2012;206:1319–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Seeber  F, Blume  M, Dunay  IR  et al. (eds.) 17th International Congress on Toxoplasmosis (ToxoXVII) Berlin, Germany, May 26th–29th 2024. EuJMI. 2024a;14:1–108. [Google Scholar]
  51. Seeber  F, Blume  M, Dunay  IR  et al.  Toxo XVII in the heart of Germany. Trends Parasitol. 2024b:40:769–74. [Google Scholar]
  52. Shwab  EK, Saraf  P, Zhu  X-Q  et al.  Human impact on the diversity and virulence of the ubiquitous zoonotic parasite Toxoplasma gondii. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115: E6956–E6963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Silveira  C, Belfort  R, Muccioli  C  et al.  The effect of long-term intermittent trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole treatment on recurrences of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:41–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Steinfeldt  T, Könen-Waisman  S, Tong  L  et al.  Phosphorylation of mouse immunity-related GTPase (IRG) resistance proteins is an evasion strategy for virulent Toxoplasma gondii. Ward  GE (ed.), PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Su  C, Khan  A, Zhou  P  et al.  Globally diverse Toxoplasma gondii isolates comprise six major clades originating from a small number of distinct ancestral lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:5844–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Tachibana  Y, Hashizaki  E, Sasai  M  et al.  Host genetics highlights IFN-γ-dependent Toxoplasma genes encoding secreted and non-secreted virulence factors in in vivo CRISPR screens. Cell Rep. 2023;42:112592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tachibana  Y, Sasai  M, Yamamoto  M. CRISPR screens identify genes essential for in vivo virulence among proteins of hyperLOPIT-unassigned subcellular localization in Toxoplasma. Boothroyd  JC (ed.), mBio. 2024;15:e01728–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tachibana  Y, Yamamoto  M. Recent advances in identifying and characterizing secretory proteins of Toxoplasma gondii by CRISPR-based screening. Parasitol Int. 2025;105:102997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Taniguchi  Y, Appiah-Kwarteng  C, Murakami  M  et al.  Atypical virulence in a type III Toxoplasma gondii strain isolated in Japan. Parasitol Int. 2018;67:587–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Trivedi  DV, Nag  S, Spudich  A  et al.  The myosin family of mechanoenzymes: from mechanisms to therapeutic approaches. Annu Rev Biochem. 2020;89:667–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Triviño-Valencia  J, Lora  F, Zuluaga  JD  et al.  Detection by PCR of pathogenic protozoa in raw and drinkable water samples in Colombia. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:1789–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Xiao  J, Yolken  RH. Strain hypothesis of Toxoplasma gondii infection on the outcome of human diseases. Acta Physiologica. 2015;213:828–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Yamamoto  M, Standley  DM, Takashima  S  et al.  A single polymorphic amino acid on Toxoplasma gondii kinase ROP16 determines the direct and strain-specific activation of Stat3. J Exp Med. 2009;206:2747–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from FEMS Microbes are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES