Abstract
Bhastrika Pranayama, a vigorous yoga breathing technique, impacts both the autonomic nervous system and brain function. This prospective interventional study examined the acute effects of Bhastrika on heart rate variability (HRV) and electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns in 20 regular yoga practitioners. Significant increases in heart rate and sympathetic activity, as well as alterations in brain wave spectra, were observed during and after the practice indicated by a rise in low-frequency (LF) power and the LF/HF ratio, along with a decrease in high-frequency (HF) power and a substantial decrease in beta, theta, alpha and gamma waves while delta waves increased. The findings suggest Bhastrika enhances sympathetic activity and modifies cognitive states. Further research is necessary to understand its long-term benefits and therapeutic potential.
Keywords: Bhastrika Pranayama, heart rate variability, electroencephalography, sympathetic nervous system, yoga, brain waves, autonomic nervous system physiology
Background:
The ancient Indian practice of Yoga is widely recognized as a scientific approach to achieving a more complete and meaningful life [1]. In recent years, the benefits of Yoga have been increasingly studied, with research exploring its health advantages for both healthy individuals and those with various medical conditions [2]. Yoga's positive effects are relevant to people of all ages and genders, including young children at formative stages in their lives [3]. "pranayama", a term for breathing exercises, is derived from the Sanskrit words "prana" (life force) and "ayama" (control) [4]. It refers to a series of controlled breathing exercises that influence various respiratory parameters, including breathing frequency, inhalation (puraka), retention (kumbhaka), exhalation (rechaka) and body locks (bandhas) [5]. Different types of pranayama have distinct effects on the body, depending on the nature and duration of the practice [6]. Some of the common pranayamas include Nadishuddhi, Kapalbhati, Bhastrika and Bhramari have been shown to impact a wide range of physiological parameters [7]. Evidence suggests that slow, deep breathing positively affects the cardiorespiratory system by lowering blood pressure and heart rate, whereas fast breathing results in a continuous but mild increase in heart rate [8]. A recent study demonstrated that practicing Bhastrika Pranayama at a low respiratory rate (RR) reduces heart rate as well as systolic and diastolic blood pressure [9]. This is further evidence that pranayama enhances cardiac sympatho-vagal balance and respiratory functions, both of which are crucial for managing psychophysiological stress [10].
Moreover, pranayama has been found to positively influence heart rate variability (HRV) by increasing parasympathetic activity, reducing the synthesis of stress hormones and enhancing Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) inhibition from the prefrontal cortex and insula to the amygdala, thereby mitigating the psychological and physical effects of stress [11]. The vagus nerve, which connects the solitary nucleus, thalamus, limbic regions and prefrontal cortex, is believed to be the psychobiological pathway through which pranayama exerts its effects [12]. A recent study examined the impact of a thirty-day Bhastrika Pranayama training course on a brain network associated with emotion processing, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and self-report questionnaires to assess changes in affect and anxiety [13]. The findings revealed that practicing Bhastrika Pranayama for four weeks could reduce anxiety and enhance positive emotions. These changes were correlated with the activity and connectivity of a brain network involved in emotion processing, including the amygdala, anterior cingulate, anterior insula and prefrontal cortex [14]. Therefore, it is of interest to scientifically study and report the acute effects of Bhastrika Pranayama on heart rate variability (HRV) and electroencephalogram (EEG) brain spectrum, aiming to observe findings related to the "autonomic-brain axis" or "neurocardiac axis", given the encouraging reports on Bhastrika's impact on HRV.
Methodology:
Study setting:
This study was conducted in the Department of Physiology and AYUSH at a tertiary care center in Central India. Prior to commencing the research, ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Human Ethics Committee, with the reference IHEC No. IM079.
Study design:
This was a prospective interventional study.
Study duration:
Two months.
Sample size:
The sample size for the repeated measures ANOVA analysis was set at 20, assuming an error rate of 0.05, a power of 80% and a medium effect size of 0.3 based on prior studies. This calculation was performed using G*Power software. Twenty healthy, regular yoga practitioners with an average age of 47 years and a normal BMI, who consented to participate, were randomly selected from the Yoga Unit of the AYUSH Department at AIIMS Bhopal.
Exclusion criteria:
Individuals with compromised pulmonary function, heart conditions, a history of smoking, walking-related dyspnea, pedal edema or high blood pressure were excluded from the study.
Intervention/procedure:
The Bhastrika Pranayama was performed under the supervision of a certified yoga practitioner. Participants were seated comfortably with a straight back and a relaxed posture. They were instructed to sit with their chin parallel to the floor, spine straight, abdomen tucked in and shoulder blades together. The participants were guided through the following steps:
[1] Inhalation: Take a deep breath in through the nose, fully expanding the lungs. The inhalation should be forceful yet not strained, with the abdomen expanding as the breath is taken in.
[2] Exhalation: Exhale forcefully and completely through the nose, contracting the abdominal muscles to push the air out rapidly. A sense of release and a rush of breath leaving the body should be felt.
[3] Rhythm: Continue this forceful inhalation and exhalation in a rhythmic pattern, ensuring the breaths are equal in duration and intensity. Maintain a steady pace without pauses between breaths.
[4] Completion: After completing five minutes of Bhastrikriya, participants returned to normal breathing and were asked to sit quietly for about five minutes, observing the effects on their body and mind.
Precautions:
Participants were advised to avoid excessive practice of this pranayama and to perform it only under professional guidance, limiting the duration to five minutes. If any participant reported dizziness, light-headedness, or discomfort during the practice, it was immediately stopped and the participant was instructed to resume normal breathing.
Measurement of parameters:
Heart rate variability (HRV) was measured using the HRV Brain Tap Dinamika Machine-NEURALCHEK (Braintap INC, New Bern, NC, USA), a cutting-edge digital analyser that evaluates HRV through neurodynamic analysis [15]. This system records an ECG while simultaneously tracking functional state indices in real-time, analyzing a broad range of frequency bands in the human heart rate signal. Both the hardware and software of Dinamika-NEURALCHEK meet the standards for measuring and interpreting cardiac intervalometry indices in clinical practice, as defined by the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Association of Electrophysiology. HRV parameters were assessed after five minutes. The equipment used included two wrist electrodes and a laptop running the mobile HRV NEURALCHEK unit, called "Dinamika". The electrodes were applied to the wrist using jelly or water. Baseline data were collected over five minutes and the parameters were recorded again during and immediately after the five-minute Bhastrikriya session while the participant remained in the same position. The brain wave spectrum was also measured during these three intervals.
Statistical analysis:
Data were tested for normality and found to be parametric, so they are presented as Mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed to compare and analyze the heart rate variability, EEG and resting measurements using SPSS for Windows, Version 28 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). Repeated measures analysis of variance was conducted. If the p-value for the ANOVA, compared to the F-statistic, was less than 0.05, it was concluded that at least one group was statistically different. Mauchly's test was used to assess the assumption of sphericity and Greenhouse-Geisser or Huynh-Feldt corrections were applied as needed.
Results:
The study on the acute effects of Bhastrika Pranayama reveals significant changes in heart rate variability (HRV) and electroencephalogram (EEG) parameters before, during and after the practice. The heart rate (HR) increased significantly post-Bhastrika, indicating heightened cardiovascular activity. Similarly, the SDNN (standard deviation of NN intervals) showed a significant increase during and after Bhastrika, reflecting improved autonomic regulation. However, pNN50 and RMSSD, both indicators of parasympathetic activity, decreased significantly post-Bhastrika, suggesting a reduction in parasympathetic influence. Interestingly, while the HF (High Frequency) component of HRV, associated with parasympathetic activity, decreased significantly, the VLF (Very Low Frequency) component increased, indicating changes in autonomic regulation. The LF/HF ratio, a marker of sympathovagal balance, increased significantly during Bhastrika, suggesting a shift towards sympathetic dominance (Table 1).
Table 1. Heart Rate Variability parameters before, during and after Bhastrikriya Pranayama.
| Parameter | Pre Bhastrika | During Bhastrika | Post Bhastrika | Repeated ANNOVA | Post Hoc Tests Green House Gelsser/ Huynh Feldt | ||
| A-B Pre/during | B-C During/post | A-C Pre/post | |||||
| HR | 72.6 | 72.85 | 75.8 | F (2, 38) 0.001* | 1 | 0.002* | 0.006* |
| SDNN | 39.15 | 45.19 | 45.63 | F (2, 38) 0.011* | 0.028* | 0.024* | 1 |
| pNN50 | 17.1 | 20.36 | 9.65 | F (2, 38) <.001* | 0.562 | 0.012* | <0.001* |
| RMSSD | 35.43 | 37.73 | 29.98 | F (2, 38) <0.001* | 0.278 | <.001* | <.001* |
| Total Power | 1482.25 | 1815.6 | 1752.65 | F (2, 38) 0.179 | 0.247 | 1 | 0.467 |
| HF | 524.2 | 372.7 | 367.85 | F (2,38) <.001* | 0.001* | 1 | <.001* |
| LF | 422.2 | 615.65 | 430.7 | F (2,38) 0.141 | 0.241 | 1.717 | 1 |
| VLF Frequency | 508.35 | 827.35 | 982.25 | F (1.45, 27.555) .001**; €=0.725 | 0.014* | 0.458 | <.001* |
| LF% | 27.73 | 28.26 | 26.68 | F (2,38) 0.934 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| HF% | 39.263 | 23.368 | 18.31 | F (2, 36) < 0.001***; €=0.797 | <.001* | 0.217 | <.001* |
| VLF% | 32.68 | 48.42 | 55.05 | F (2, 26) < .001*** | <.001* | 0.275 | <.001* |
| LF/HF Ratio | 0.914 | 1.817 | 1.335 | F (2,38) 0.012* | 0.010* | 0.304 | 0.454 |
| *Significance p<0.05; ** Test of sphericity; Greenhouse-Geisser test € *** Huynh-Feldt test € | |||||||
| HR-Heart Rate; SDNN-Standard deviation of the NN (R-R) intervals; pNN50-The proportion of NN50 divided by the total number of NN | |||||||
| (R-R) intervals; RMSSD: Root mean square of the successive differences; HF- High Frequency; LF- Low Frequency; VLF: Very Low Frequency. |
In terms of EEG parameters, Bhastrika Pranayama led to a significant decrease in theta, alpha, beta and gamma waves, all of which are associated with various states of relaxation, alertness and cognitive processing (Table 2). The most notable decrease was observed in alpha waves post-Bhastrika, indicating reduced relaxation or heightened arousal. Conversely, delta waves, typically associated with deep sleep and rest, increased significantly during and after Bhastrika, suggesting a shift towards deeper states of relaxation or altered consciousness. Bhastrika Pranayama exerts a profound influence on both autonomic nervous system activity and brain function. The practice appears to induce a state of increased sympathetic activity and reduced parasympathetic influence, coupled with significant changes in brain wave patterns that suggest altered states of consciousness. These findings highlight the potential of Bhastrika Pranayama as a powerful tool for modulating physiological and neurological states, with implications for both health and wellness.
Table 2. Comparison of EEG parameters before, during and after Bhastrika.
| Parameter | Pre Bhastrika | During Bhastrika | Post Bhastrika | Repeated ANNOVA | Post Hoc Tests Green House Gelsser/ Huynh Feldt | ||
| A-B Pre/during | B-C During/post | A-C Pre/post | |||||
| Theta waves | 20.47 | 14.89 | 13.84 | F (2, 36) 0.002* | 0.016* | 1 | 0.003* |
| Alpha waves | 15.78 | 13.84 | 6.78 | F (1.36, 24.502) 0.002** €=0.681** | 1 | 0.005* | <.001 |
| Beta waves | 12 | 8.47 | 5.57 | F (1.305, 23.49) 0.020** €=0.653** | 0.232 | 0.432 | 0.006* |
| Gamma waves | 6.684 | 4.579 | 4 | F (2, 36) <.001* | 0.007 | 1 | <.001* |
| Delta waves | 45.105 | 58.474 | 69.895 | F (1.535, 27.625) <.001 ** €=0.767** | 0.014* | 0.042* | <.001* |
| *Significance p<0.05; ** Test of sphericity; Greenhouse-Geisser test € |
Discussion:
Bhastrika Pranayama is a yoga breathing technique characterized by forceful and rapid inhalation and exhalation and it is believed to enhance heart rate variability (HRV) [16]. In our study, we observed an increase in both SDNN and total power during Bhastrika practice (Table 1), indicating an overall improvement in Heart rate variability (HRV). Higher HRV is generally associated with better cardiovascular health and overall well-being [17]. Bhastrika Pranayama has been shown to enhance HRV, suggesting a more flexible and responsive autonomic nervous system [18]. During slow Bhastrika Pranayama (fewer than seven breaths per minute), deep and controlled breathing activates the parasympathetic nervous system, which promotes relaxation and rest [19]. However, in the fast and dynamic Bhastrika Pranayama practiced in our study (more than seven breaths per minute), there was an increase in sympathetic activity. This was reflected in the rise in mean heart rate, LF power (nu %), LF/HF ratio, LF and LF% during Bhastrika practice, indicating the activation of the sympathetic nervous system. The LF/HF ratio increase was highly statistically significant during the manoeuver, while HF and HF% decreased significantly (p<0.001), showing parasympathetic withdrawal. Literature suggests that fast-paced Bhastrika (>60 breaths/minute) increases heart rate, rate pressure product and double product, indicating an increased load on the heart and a subsequent reduction in HRV [20]. In contrast, slow-paced Bhastrika (6 breaths/minute) leads to reductions in blood pressure and heart rate, indicative of parasympathetic activation [21]. Therefore, the cardiovascular impact of rapid Bhastrika observed in our study may be linked to the increased burden on the heart and decreased HRV due to heightened sympathetic activity and reduced parasympathetic response. The changes in HRV during rapid Bhastrika are similar to those observed during physical exercise, making it a potential alternative for individuals who are unwilling or unable to engage in traditional exercise [22].
In our study, the increase in heart rate observed during Bhastrikriya was sustained and did not return to normal resting levels even after five minutes. This may be attributed to the increased breath rate during Bhastrika, sympathetic stimulation and parasympathetic withdrawal. These values remained higher than baseline even five minutes post-practice. Bhastrika Pranayama, characterized by vigorous inhalation and exhalation, has also been associated with increases in blood pressure and heart rate, decreased CO2 levels, vasoconstriction and reduced cerebral blood flow (CBF) in intracranial arteries. Supporting this theory, research has shown that different pranayamas have opposing effects on cerebral hemodynamics when examined using continuous transcranial Doppler (TCD) [23]. Specifically, Bhastrika Pranayama has been found to lower CBF while raising heart rate and blood pressure, leading to hypocapnia. Comparing Bhastrika Pranayama with Kapalbhati (KB), which involves single active inhalations followed by strong expirations, KB has been shown to increase mental activity. Both Bhastrika and KB share similarities in cerebral hemo-dynamics and EEG signals, as both can increase sympathetic activity.
EEG and Bhastrika:
Spectrum of brain activity:
During Bhastrika, the delta wave increased and continued to raise post-pranayama, indicating a sustained effect of the practice. In contrast, beta, theta, alpha and gamma waves decreased significantly during Bhastrika (Table 2). A similar study on Satyananda Yogis found that after four years of practice, theta and alpha (low-frequency oscillations) increased in the right superior frontal, right inferior frontal and right anterior temporal lobes. After 30 years, beta and gamma (high-frequency oscillations) increased in the same regions [24]. Our previous research has focused on yoga practitioners who have engaged in slow, deep breathing exercises and meditation for 10 to 16 years. These practices have been shown to enhance beta and gamma activity, with gamma oscillations linked to the brain's frontal default mode network, reflecting improved coherence observed in long-term mindfulness meditators [25, 26]. Other studies have shown that regular meditation practice leads to high-amplitude gamma synchronization across the frontal and parieto-temporal lobes in EEG recordings [27]. However, in our study, beta, theta, alpha and gamma waves decreased during Bhastrika. This may be due to the short duration of the pranayama in this acute study. Further research is needed to understand the long term effects of Bhastrika on the brain's EEG wave spectrum.
This study has some limitations, including (i) a limited sample size and (ii) the need for additional tests, such as baroreflex sensitivity. Therefore, further research with a larger sample size and objective criteria is needed for a clearer understanding. (iii) As this was an acute study, the effects of chronic Bhastrika practice need to be determined. Understanding the long-term impacts of Bhastrika on the brain's EEG wave spectrum and HRV requires more research. The HRV variations observed during fast-paced Bhastrika are comparable to those seen during physical exercise. Bhastrika Pranayama may offer benefits similar to those of physical exercise for individuals who are unwilling or unable to exercise. Regular practice of Bhastrika Pranayama can help manage anxiety by calming the body and mind, potentially improving heart and lung function, blood flow and cardiovascular health. Bhastrika strengthens the respiratory system, increases oxygen intake and detoxifies the lungs, making it beneficial for respiratory ailments like asthma and bronchitis.
Conclusion:
The study demonstrates that Bhastrika Pranayama significantly affects autonomic nervous system function by increasing sympathetic activity and decreasing parasympathetic influence, as shown by changes in heart rate variability. Additionally, it alters EEG brain wave patterns, indicating shifts in cognitive processing and states of consciousness. These findings suggest that Bhastrika Pranayama may offer therapeutic benefits for stress management and mental clarity, but further research is needed to assess its long-term effects.
Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Ethical statement:
This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institute. Before the start of the research, the Institutional Human Ethics Committee provided its ethical permission through a letter with IHEC No. IM079 as the reference. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Priyanka Patel, Storekeeper cum- clerk for her help in entering the data and are indebted to Dr Patrick Porter for donating us the HRV- NeuralChek (Braintap INC, New Bern, NC, USA)
Nil
Edited by P Kangueane
Citation: Malhotra et al. Bioinformation 20(11):1549-1554(2024)
Declaration on Publication Ethics: The author's state that they adhere with COPE guidelines on publishing ethics as described elsewhere at https://publicationethics.org/. The authors also undertake that they are not associated with any other third party (governmental or non-governmental agencies) linking with any form of unethical issues connecting to this publication. The authors also declare that they are not withholding any information that is misleading to the publisher in regard to this article.
Declaration on official E-mail: The corresponding author declares that official e-mail from their institution is not available for all authors.
License statement: This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
Comments from readers: Articles published in BIOINFORMATION are open for relevant post publication comments and criticisms, which will be published immediately linking to the original article without open access charges. Comments should be concise, coherent and critical in less than 1000 words.
Bioinformation Impact Factor:Impact Factor (Clarivate Inc 2023 release) for BIOINFORMATION is 1.9 with 2,198 citations from 2020 to 2022 taken for IF calculations.
Disclaimer:The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the views or opinions of Bioinformation and (or) its publisher Biomedical Informatics. Biomedical Informatics remains neutral and allows authors to specify their address and affiliation details including territory where required. Bioinformation provides a platform for scholarly communication of data and information to create knowledge in the Biological/Biomedical domain.
References
- 1.Woodyard C. Int J Yoga. . 2011;4:49. doi: 10.4103/0973-6131.85485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yatham P, et al. Cureus. . 2023;15:e43466. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hagen I, Nayar US. Front Psychiatry. . 2014;5:35. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tobe M, Saito S. J Anesth. 2020;34:944. doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02840-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Saoji A.A, et al. J Ayurveda Integr Med. . 2019;10:50. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2017.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mondal S. J Ayurveda Integr Med. . 2024;15:100877. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2023.100877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sengupta P. Int J Prev Med. . 2012;3:444. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Goyal R, et al. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. . 2014;4:67. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.136776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Budhi R.B, et al. Int J Yoga. . 2019;12:233. doi: 10.4103/ijoy.IJOY_43_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Saoji A.A, et al. J Ayurveda Integr Med. . 2019;10:50. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2017.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Guimarães A.P, et al. J Diet Suppl. . 2024;21:512. doi: 10.1080/19390211.2024.2308262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Breit S. Front Psychiatry. . 2018;9:44. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Novaes M.M, et al. Front Psychiatry. . 2020;11:467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lavretsky H, Feldman JL. Glob Adv Health Med. . 2021;10:2164956120986129.. doi: 10.1177/2164956120986129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Malhotra V, et al. J Family Med Prim Care. . 2022;11:720. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1662_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Noble D.J, Hochman S. Front Physiol. . 2019;10:1176. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tiwari R, et al. CurrCardiol Rev. . 2021;17:e160721189770. doi: 10.2174/1573403X16999201231203854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Campanelli S, et al. Int J Yoga. . 2020;13:183. doi: 10.4103/ijoy.IJOY_91_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pramanik T, et al. J Altern Complement Med. . 2009;15:293. doi: 10.1089/acm.2008.0440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Garg P, et al. Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. . 2023;20:200232. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2023.200232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sharma V.K, et al. Int J Yoga. . 2013;6:104. doi: 10.4103/0973-6131.113400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nivethitha L, et al. Int J Yoga. . 2017;10:99. doi: 10.4103/0973-6131.205518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nivethitha L, et al. J Neurosci Rural Pract. . 2017;8:60. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.193532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Thomas J, et al. Front Hum Neurosci. . 2014;8:197. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Malhotra V, et al. Mymensingh Med J. . 2021;30:1163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Malhotra V, et al. J Educ Health Promot. . 2022;11:280. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_343_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kaur C, Singh P. AdvPrev Med. . 2015;15:614723. doi: 10.1155/2015/614723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
