Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Mar 31;20(3):e0320538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320538

Exposure to circadian disrupting environment and high-fat diet during pregnancy and lactation alter reproductive competence and lipid profiles of liver, mammary, plasma and milk of ICR mice

Leriana Garcia Reis 1, Kelsey Teeple 1, Michayla Dinn 1, Jenna Schoonmaker 1, Sara Brook Scinto 1, Christina Ramires Ferreira 2, Theresa Casey 1,*
Editor: Henrik Oster3
PMCID: PMC11957368  PMID: 40163509

Abstract

This study’s objective was to determine the effects of pre-pregnancy obesity induced by a high-fat diet and exposure to circadian-disrupting light-dark phase shifts on birth littler size, pup survival to 24h and growth to lactation day 12, and their relationship to maternal feeding patterns, fecal corticosterone levels, milk composition, and lipid profiles of liver, plasma, mammary gland, and milk. A 2 by 2 factorial designed experiment of female ICR mice assigned to control (CON; 10% fat) or high-fat (HF; 60% fat) and either a 12-hour light-dark (LD) cycle or a chronic jet lag model of 6-hour phase-shifts (PS) in light-dark cycle every 3 days throughout pregnancy and lactation, resulted in 4 treatment groups: CON-LD, CON-PS, HF-LD and HF-PS. HF diet increased maternal pre-pregnancy body weight and elevated milk lactose. Whereas PS reduced milk lactose within the CON diet group, and increased maternal feed intake and fecal corticosterone levels. PS exposure also affected the time of day of birth. Neither PS nor HF affected birth litter size or pup survival. Only diet impacted final litter weight, with HF greater than CON. Among the 1204 lipids detected by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)-profiling, diet altered 67.1% in milk, 58.1% in mammary gland, 27.2% in the liver, and 10.9% in plasma, with HF increasing the carbon length of diacylglycerols in the liver and milk, and carbon length of triacylglycerols in plasma, mammary gland and milk. Although exposure to PS had no overall impact on maternal lipid profiles, interactions (P < 0.05) were found between PS and diets in the phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolanine class of lipids. Findings support that high fat diet and exposure to circadian disrupting environments impact maternal feeding behavior and stress responses as well as lipid profiles, which may relate to their negative association with maternal health and offspring development.

Introduction

Obesity and circadian disrupting environments such rotating shift work, transmeridian travel, and behaviors that cause social jetlag are common in modern societies [1]. Epidemiological evidence links obesity and circadian disruption to the development of chronic non-communicable diseases like metabolic syndrome and cancer [2,3]. Obesity and exposure to circadian disrupting environments are also linked to reproductive dysfunction, subfertility, and poorer breastfeeding outcomes in women [46]. The integrated and reciprocal regulation of the circadian and metabolic systems likely confound the influence of obesity and circadian disruption on the reproductive competence of women. Both are related to development of insulin resistance and dyslipidemia and alter hormonal milieu, all of which are linked to decreased fertility and poorer lactation outcomes in humans [5].

Circadian rhythms are 24 h cycles of behavior and physiology that function to synchronize physiological processes across the body and with the external environment. Circadian clocks that generate these rhythms play a central role in maintaining metabolic homeostasis and coordinating the timing of reproductive processes like ovulation and parturition [710]. The 24 h rhythms generated by circadian clocks are integrated into homeostatic feedback loops and repair pathways. Responsiveness of the master clock in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) to light and peripheral clocks to feeding time enables synchronization and adaptation to seasonal changes in day length and food availability. However, exogenous and endogenous factors that function as inputs to the circadian clocks disrupt their timing and the order of physiologic functions when applied at unusual and inappropriate times and are referred to as chronodisruptors [11]. Changes in the natural light-dark cycle perturb the circadian system. Other chronodisrupters include inappropriately timed food intake and physical activity and biological stress [911]. Nutritional quality and obesity also play a role in maintaining robustness of the circadian system.

Orchestrated changes occur in maternal behavior and physiology to support the growth and development of the fetus during gestation and the nutritional demands of neonates during lactation. Maternal nutritional state and the external environment can impact these adaptions to pregnancy and lactation [12]. Since maternal environment governs offspring environment during pregnancy and lactation, these alterations can have profound and long-term effects on offspring development and health. For example, exposure of pregnant ewes to a changing shift work model altered maternal metabolism and increased gestation length and decreased birth weight of offspring [13]. Studies of rats found maternal exposure to chronic light-phase shifts during gestation and the first week postnatal resulted in rat offspring displaying age and gender dependent hyperleptinemia, hyperinsulinemia, poor glucose tolerance, insulin resistance and increased adiposity [14]. Exposure of offspring to maternal circadian disruption during lactation alone reduced adult body mass, increased social avoidance and hyperactivity. Whereas exclusive in utero exposure to maternal circadian disruption was associated with social avoidance and hyperactivity [15]. Epidemiologic data and controlled animal studies demonstrate that early exposure to maternal high-fat diet (HFD) during pregnancy and lactation also has long-term effects on offspring health, which include development of metabolic syndrome, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular dysfunction and alterations in neurological development [1620].

Our overall goal is to determine if and how circadian disruption and obesity interact to affect maternal reproductive competence and the consequence to offspring. Our previous studies found that feeding a high-fat diet for 4 weeks prior to mating significantly increased body weight and percent body fat of female mice as well as altered their circadian feeding patterns, attenuated corticosterone circadian rhythms and significantly increased hair corticosterone levels, independent of final body weight [21]. Here we describe a 2 by 2 factorial designed study to analyze the effect of circadian disruption through exposure to continuous 6h light-dark phase shifts, which affect circadian behavior, hormonal release and clock gene rhythms across multiple organs [2225], and high-fat diet induced obesity during gestation and lactation on birth litter size and postnatal weight to lactation day 12. These findings were related to the effect of treatment and diet on maternal diurnal and nocturnal feed intake and fecal corticosterone output across pregnancy and lactation, circulating prolactin, triacylglycerol (TG) and Hb1Ac levels, an indicator of glycemic control, and milk macronutrient composition. In addition, our previous study found that high-fat diet increased the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) in milk. MDA is a marker if oxidative damage of lipids via peroxidation. Nutrition affects lipid metabolism, and circadian clocks regulate lipid metabolism in the liver and mammary gland [2629]. High-fat diet and circadian disruption increase oxidative stress and dyslipidemia [30,31], and thus we conducted exploratory lipidome analysis using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) to determine if treatment and diet affected liver, plasma, mammary gland and milk lipid profiles.

Materials and methods

Animals and experimental design

Animal use protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC; protocol # 2104002135) of Purdue University prior to beginning studies. Three-week-old female ICR mice (n = 40) were obtained from Evigno (CD1, Indianapolis, IN, USA), ear tagged, acclimated for two weeks, and then randomly assigned into one of two dietary treatments: control (CON, n = 20) and high-fat (HF, n = 20). Prior to mating, the females were housed in groups of 5 based on treatment for 4 weeks and fed either a control diet (Research Diets D12450J, 10% of total kcal energy is fat and 7% of total kcal is sucrose; 3.85 kcal/g) or high-fat diet (Research Diets D12492, 60% of kcal energy is fat and 7% of kcal energy is sucrose; 5.24 kcal/g), as we have described [21]. During acclimation and the following four-week period all mice were exposed to 12 h light-12 h dark cycles.

After the 4-weeks on experimental diets, females were weighed (pre-pregnancy weight) and mated with males at a 2 to 1 ratio. Females were checked twice daily at 12 h intervals for the presence of a vaginal plug, indicating successful mating and considered gestation day 1. Upon observation of vaginal plug or after 5 days with males, females were moved into one of the experimental light rooms where they were singularly housed and remained until 12 days postpartum. The experimental lighting was control (LD), or phase shifted (PS). The LD mice were exposed to regular 12 h light (L) - 12 h dark (D) cycles, with the light phase averaging 114 lux at mouse eye level. The PS mice were exposed to the same lux of light for 12 h each day, and 12 h of darkness, but every three days the start of the light cycle was shifted forward 6 h (Fig 1). Although mice were checked twice daily for vaginal plugs after placement with males for mating, the presence was only observed in 18 of the 40 mice and there were not enough animals in each treatment group to analyze the effect of diet and light on length of gestation. The 2 X 2 factorial study design resulted in 4 treatments of CON-LD (n = 8), CON-PS (n = 9), HF-LD (n = 8) and HF-PS (n = 7). The conception rate was 85% for CON and 75% for HF.

Fig 1. Experimental design and data collection overview of the 2 x 2 factorial study.

Fig 1

The study investigated the combined effects of diet, high fat (60% fat, HF) or control (10% fat, CON), and light exposures that maintain homeostasis, regular 24 h cycles of 12 h of light and 12 h of dark (LD), or disrupt the circadian timing system, 6 h light phase shifts every 3 days (PS), on birth littler size, pup survival to 24 h and growth to lactation day 12, and their relationship to maternal feeding patterns, fecal corticosterone levels, milk composition, and lipid profiles of liver, plasma, mammary gland, and milk. Female ICR mice began experimental diets 4 weeks (CON or HF) prior to mating to males at a 2:1 ratio to achieve differential body weight prior to pregnancy. After mating, females remained on respective diets and were housed individually under experimental lighting conditions until 12 days postpartum. Lighting conditions included a control (LD) 12 h light (114 lux at mouse eye level) - 12 h dark cycle (LD) or a chronic 6 h light phase-shift (PS), where the light phase was advanced by 6 h every three days. This resulted in 4 treatment groups: CON-LD, CON-PS, HF-LD, and HF-PS, with final group sizes of n = 8, n = 9, n = 8, and n = 7, respectively (A). Feed intake was measured twice daily to capture ‘day’ (0600-1800) and ‘night’ (1800-0600) feeding patterns. Feces were also collected twice daily from the cages to capture day (0600-1800) and night (1800-0600) output in early pregnancy (d5-d7), late pregnancy (d14 to parturition (~d18), and lactation (d4 to d6 of lactation). Females were allowed to birth naturally, time of day of birth was recorded and at 24 h postnatal, litters were standardized to n = 8 neonates/dam. Birth litter size, and pup survival to 24 h were recorded. Litter weight was taken every 2 days from day 0 to day 12 of lactation (L12). On L12, dams and pups were separated at 0600. Pups were weighed and then immediately euthanized. After 3 h of separation from pups, dams were milked, euthanized and blood and tissues collected (B).

Females were allowed to birth naturally, time of day of birth was recorded and at 24 h postnatal, litters were standardized to n = 8 neonates/dam. Birth litter size, and pup survival to 24 h were recorded. Litter weight was taken every 2 days from day 0 to day 12 of lactation, dams and pups were separated at 0600. Pups were weighed, and then euthanized by decapitation. After 3 h of separation from pups, dams were milked. Immediately after milking, dams were euthanized via slow fill CO2 inhalation, followed by cervical dislocation as a secondary method. Blood was collected from the dam via cardiac punction and placed in an 7.5% EDTA K3 plasma separating tube (Covidien, Dublin, Ireland). Dams were then weighed.

Note, time is expressed in a 24-hour format (e.g., 0600 indicates 6:00 AM). In this study, “day” refers to the period from 0600 to 1800, and “night” refers to 1800 to 0600, regardless of the light pattern in the PS group.

Weigh-suckle-weigh to estimate milk production and litter parameters

On lactation d10, dam was removed from cage for 2 h between 0800-1000. Time is expressed in a 24-hour format (e.g., 0800 indicates 8:00 AM). The cage was placed on a heating pad to keep pups warm. At the end of 2 h separation, pups were weighed and then dam was returned to the cage and pups were observed suckling and then weighed. The difference in weight from prior to and then after suckling was used to estimate milk production. Suckling duration was not timed but was observed until completion of suckling bout to ensure that all pups had adequate access to nursing. Birth litter size, litter weight, time of day of birth and pup survival to 24 h were also evaluated.

Milk composition analysis

On lactation day 12, dams and pups were separated for ~ 3 hours prior to milking the dams. Milk collection was performed using a method modified from DePeters and Hovey [32], under light anesthesia using 3% isoflurane gas at a rate of 1.0 L/minute oxygen. To facilitate milk let down, dams were administered an intraperitoneal injection 0.2 mL of oxytocin (IP 20 Units/mL, Vet One, Boise, ID USA). The nipple area was dampened with 18-ohm water. A rubber stopper was placed in a 2 mL microcentrifuge tube, through which two 21 G X 1.5 in needles were inserted: one for suction to collect milk, and the other connected to tygon tubing linked to an electric pump (Swing Breast Pump, Medela, Baar, Switzerland). Following collection, milk was place in -80ºC until analysis.

Milk was thawed overnight at 4˚C under constant rotation to homogenize. Milk was diluted 1:100 with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for analysis of protein content using a Bradford assay (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 1:500 with PBS to measure lactose using a commercial kit (MAK017, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Milk TG was measured by preparing a 1:5 dilution using the Cayman Chemical kit (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). TG, which comprise approximately 98% of milk fat, were measured as a representation of total fat content.

Blood and plasma analyses

Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a validated marker of glycemic control in mice [3335]. Whole blood HbA1c was measured in undiluted whole blood collected in EDTA tubes using a commercial assay kit (Crystal Chem, Elk Grove Village, IL, USA). Plasma triacylglycerol (TG) was measured following 1:5 dilution with PBS using the Cayman Chemical kit. Plasma prolactin was measured in a 1:20 dilution of plasma using an ELISA kit (ab100736, Abcam, Waltham, MA, USA). All assays were performed following the manufacturers’ instructions.

Total feed intake

Feed intake was measured for the period of the day (0600–1800) and night (1800–0600). Intake was determined by weighing feed at 0600 and 1800 daily. To calculate the amount of food consumed during the day, the amount (grams) of food the mice had at 1800 was subtracted from the amount of food they started with at 0600 (0600 - 1800). For the night value, day weight was subtracted from the night weight (1800 - 0600). Values were recorded then assigned to physiological state, with early pregnancy encompassing d1-6, mid pregnancy d7-13 and late pregnancy d14-parturition, day of parturition, and then early lactation d1-4, mid lactation d5-8 and late lactation d9-12. Kcal of intake was determined by multiplying grams consumed by 3.85 kcal/g for CON, or 5.24 kcal/g for HF.

Fecal collection, extraction and analysis of corticosterone content

Feces were collected twice daily from the cages to capture day (0600-1800) and night (1800-0600) output in early pregnancy (EP) d5-d7, mid pregnancy d7-d13, late pregnancy d14 to parturition (~d16), and lactation from day 4 to day 6. Mice were transferred to a new cage with fresh corn cob bedding and fecal material was separated from the bedding, collected, and stored at −20˚C.

To extract corticosterone (pg.mL-1), feces were aliquoted to ~ 0.2g and then ground using a Precellys 24 Lysis & Homogenization (Bertin Technologies, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France). After grinding, 2 mL/0.2 g of ethanol was added, and the sample was centrifuged. Approximately 1.3mL of the supernatant was pipetted into 2 separate tubes and dried in the speed vac for an hour. Once samples were dried, they were stored at -20˚C. Samples were reconstituted in 32.5 µ L of absolute ethanol and analyzed using the corticosterone Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) from Arbor Assays (catalog no. K014, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) following manufacturer’s protocol. Absorbance was read at 450 nm on the Spark 10M multimode microplate reader (Tecan Trading AG, Switzerland).

Lipid profiling analysis

Lipid extraction was performed according to the Bligh & Dyer protocol [36]. Briefly, 10 μL of milk and 100 μL of plasma were used for extraction, and deionized water (DI H2O) was added in a microtube to bring the final volume to 200 μL. Tissue samples were individually weighed and ~ 126 mg of liver and ~ 156 mg of mammary gland was homogenized in 2 mL vials with 1.4 mm ceramic (zirconium oxide) beads with 500 μL of water using the Precellys24 tissue homogenizer (Bertin Technologies, Rockville, MD, USA). Part of the homogenate (200 μL) was transferred to a microtube. Then, for all the matrices (liver, mammary gland, milk and plasma), 550 μL of methanol and 250 μL of chloroform (CHCl3 +  0.01% BHT) were added and vortexed for 10 seconds to form a one-phase solution. The samples were incubated for 15 min at 4 °C. Next, another 250 μL of ultrapure H2O and 250 μL of CHCl3 +  0.01% BHT were added. Samples were then centrifuged at 15,000 g for 10 min to enhance polar from nonpolar phase separation (two-phase solution). The organic phase was transferred to a new tube. Additionally, an aliquot of the lipid extract of each sample was mixed by treatment to produce pooled samples. All tubes were dried in a centrifugal evaporator (Savant SpeedVac AES2010, ThermoFisher Scientific, San Jose, CA). Dried lipid extracts were stored at − 80 °C until mass spectrometry analysis.

MRM profiling analysis was conducted in two phases, discovery and screening. For the discovery phase, samples pooled by treatment and tissue-matrix (16 pools) were profiled for a list of MRMs related to lipid species generated by combining the m/z for the molecular ion based on the LIPID MAPS® online database and a class- or fatty acyl loss-specific product ion [37]. To prepare such list, constitutional isomers were combined into one single entry in which only the lipid class, number of total carbons across fatty acyl residues and unsaturation number is listed. This strategy allowed compaction of the large number of entries (16,257) by one order of magnitude (3,437 MRMs in the final list) due to the large number of isobaric lipids. The 3,437 MRMs were profiled in the discovery step for the pooled samples of each experimental group by tissue-matrix. Of the 3,437 MRM profiled in the discovery phase, 1,491 were found to be at least 1.3-fold higher than the blank in at least one pooled sample. These 1,491 MRM were then used to interrogate individual samples in the screening phase of the MRM profiling analysis.

Due to the limited time of signal provided by the sample at flow injection, the 1,491 MRMs profiled in the screening phase, were organized into 10 methods (Supplementary S1 File), each one involving 2 minutes of data acquisition for a maximum of 250 MRM transitions. Dried lipid extracts were reconstituted in acetronitrile (ACN) +  methanol (MeOH) +  300 mM ammonium acetate (NH4Ac) 3:6.65:0.35 (v/v), with the same volume dried, which was 300 μL for pools, and 200 μL for each sample, composing the stock solution. The reconstituted extracts were individually diluted 100X for milk, 400X for mammary, 600X for liver and 250X for plasma, with injection solvent ACN +  MeOH +  300 mM NH4Ac 3:6.65:0.35 (v/v). The screening phase of the MRM profiling was conducted by injecting 8 µ L of the diluted lipid extract to the ESI source of an Agilent 6410 QQQ mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using a micro-autosampler (G1377A). The precursor ion selection window was 0.7 Th. The capillary pump connected to the autosampler operated with a flow of 10 μL/min and a pressure of 150 bar. Capillary voltage on the instrument was 3.5-5 kV and the gas flow was 5.1 L/min at 300°C.

The ion intensities of all MRMs were recovered, and each lipid ion was normalized by the total ion intensity of each sample (normalization by SUM) within each lipid class (phosphatidylcholines (PC), phosphatidylethanolamines (PE), phosphatidylserines (PS), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), diacylglycerols (DG), triacylglycerols (TG), ceramides (Cer), sphingomyelins (SM), cholesteryl ester (CE), acyl-carnitines (AC), and free fatty acids (FFA), to acquire relative amounts. Subsequently, all data were consolidated into a unified file for each matrix (liver, mammary, milk, and plasma). Data analysis was performed using MetaboAnalyst 6.0 [38]. Following upload, data were normalized by auto-scaling and checked for normal distribution. Multivariate statistical tests included principal component analysis (PCA), and linear model, and univariate tests included T-test, were used to identify lipids significantly influenced by diet and PS treatment.

Data and statistical analysis

Statistical analyses, other than lipidome data, were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). The data were analyzed in a completely randomized design, and the animal was considered an experimental unit. The animals were randomly distributed in 1 of 2 dietary treatments and subsequently females were moved into one of the two experimental light rooms. The normality of the residues was verified by the Shapiro-Wilk test (UNIVARIATE procedure of SAS), and the Levene test compared the homogeneity of the variances. Variables with a continuous distribution such as feed intake, dam weight, birth litter size, weigh suckle weigh, TG, protein, lactose, prolactin and corticosterone concentration were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. When the time factor was not present, the statistical model included treatments (diet and light), stage (pregnancy and lactation), period of the day (day or night) as fixed effects, and mice as random effects. When the time factor was present (dam weight and litter weight), repeated measures models were fitted by multiple mixed linear models using the MIXED procedure of SAS, in which the statistical model included: the fixed effects of treatments (diet and light), period/day and their interaction, and the random effect of the animal. The experimental unit was the mice. The SLICE option using the LSMEANS/PDIFF command was used to explore the interactions of data collection. The Kenward-Roger method was used to correct the degree of freedom of the denominator for the F test. The time of day of birth and pup death were evaluated by Chi-Square Test. The covariance structure was determined based on the lowest Akaike (AIC) information criteria value. Significance level was set at P <  0.05 and tendency towards significance at 0.05 <  P <  0.10.

Results

Feed intake and energy intake

The impact of HF diet and PS exposure on feed intake (amount in grams consumed) and energy intake (kcal consumed) by physiological stage (early, middle and late pregnancy and lactation) and period of the day (day: 0600-1800 or night: 1800-0600) were analyzed. Changes in amount of feed intake, particularly by time of day and physiological stage (i.e., early mid and late pregnancy and lactation) reflect changes in patterns of feeding behavior that may relate to dam diet, light treatment and the demands of physiological stage. Whereas changes in energy intake reflects the number of kilocalories consumed, which may reflect alterations in behavior in response to treatments or diets, as well as the metabolic needs based on the kilocalorie density of the diet.

Analysis of the number of grams consumed by mouse dams, found it significantly influenced by maternal diet and light exposure as well as period of the day (day or night), and physiological stage (P < 0.05, Table 1 in Supplementary S2 File). Energy intake was also significantly affected by PS exposure, time of day, physiological stage, and the interactions between PS exposure and period of the day, as well as the three-way interaction between stage, PS, and period of the day (P < 0.05, Table 1 in Supplementary S2 File). Overall, HF diet reduced grams of feed intake by dams relative to CON. Whereas PS exposure had an overall effect of increasing grams of feed intake and kilocalories of energy intake compared to the LD group (Table 1 in Supplementary S2 File). Analysis of the overall effect of physiological stage on feed intake founddams consumed more grams and kilocalories during lactation, with mid and late lactation showing higher levels of intake (P < 0.01) than all stages of gestation and early lactation. Overall, mice also consumed more food during the night period (1800-0600) compared to the day (0600-1800) for both grams and kcal of food intake (Table 1 in Supplementary S2 File), although notably, the amount consumed during both the day and night increased progressively from early gestation to mid-lactation and intake.

There was also a significant interaction (P < 0.01, Table 1 in Supplementary S2 File) between chronic jet lag exposure and time of day for diet consumed in grams (Fig 2A) and kcal (Fig 2B). Post-hoc analysis revealed that both LD and PS mice consumed the most food during the night period. However, within the daytime period, PS mice had a higher feed and energy intake compared to LD mice (Fig 2A and 2B).

Fig 2. Impact of light/dark (LD) exposure and phase shifts (PS) on diurnal feed and energy intake (A, B) and effect of light exposure, physiological stage, and time of day on feed and energy intake in mice (C, D).

Fig 2

LD, regular cycles of 12 hours of light and 12 hours of dark, and PS, mice exposed to 6-hour shifts in light-dark cycles every three days. Values are LS means ±  SEM. Fig A and B: different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.001, with uppercase indicating a difference between treatments during the day, and lowercase indicating a difference between treatments during the night. Fig C and D: different letters indicate a tendency (P =  0.05) for feed intake and a significant difference (P < 0.05) for energy intake, with uppercase indicating a difference between day and night for LD, and lowercase indicating a difference between day and night for PS treatment.

There was also a tendency for a three-way interaction between stage, light, and period of the day to influence feed intake (P =  0.05, Table 1 in Supplementary S2 File). In particular, PS mice consumed more feed during both the night and day in mid and late lactation compared to day or night in early, mid and late pregnancy (Fig 2C and 2D). Additionally, in the late stages of pregnancy and late lactation PS mice had a tendency for higher feed intake in the daytime hours(Fig 2C and 2D). Interestingly, mice exposed to PS had their second highest food intake during two specific periods: the nighttime period of early lactation and the daytime period of late lactation. The food intake was the same in both periods (Fig 2C and 2D).

Fecal corticosterone levels and fecal weight

Measuring fecal corticosterone provides a non-invasive means of evaluating changes of this stress related hormone in mice [21,39,40]. To assess the potential impact of HF diet and PS light exposure on fecal corticosterone levels by period of the day and physiological stage, feces were collected twice daily at 0600 and 1800 to represent night and day output in early pregnancy (EP) d5-d7, late pregnancy d14 to parturition (~d18), and day 4-6 of lactation. Although physiological stage had an overall effect on fecal corticosterone levels in mice (P =  0.0003, Table 2 in Supplementary S2 File), there was a significant interaction between light treatment exposure and physiological stage for corticosterone levels (P =  0.004, Fig 3A). Mice exposed to PS exhibited similar corticosterone levels across all physiological stages. This was in contrast to the LD group. In LD mice maternal corticosterone levels were highest in late pregnancy, followed by early pregnancy, and lowest during lactation (Fig 3A).

Fig 3. Interaction between light and stage on fecal corticosterone levels (A), interaction between light exposure and diet on fecal weight (B) and interaction between light and day on corticosterone output in feces (C).

Fig 3

LD, regular cycles of 12 hours of light and 12 hours of dark, and PS, mice exposed to 6-hour shifts in light-dark cycles every three days. Control (CON) mice were fed a diet of 10% fat, and high-fat (HF) diet were fed a diet of 60% fat. Values are LS means ±  SEM. Early pregnancy (EP) was from d5-d7, late pregnancy (LP) was from d14-d16, and lactation was d4-d6. Fig A: This interaction was significant, with a P-value of 0.004. Uppercase indicates a significant difference between stages within LD light, and lowercase indicates a significant difference between stages within PS light. Fig B: This interaction was significant, with a P-value of 0.008. Bracket indicates a significant difference (P < 0.002) between diets within lights. Uppercase indicates a significant difference between CON diet, and lowercase indicates a significant difference between HF diet across the lights. Fig C: This interaction tended to be significant, with a P-value of 0.068. Uppercase indicates a tendency to be a significant difference between day, and lowercase indicates a tendency to be a significant difference between night across the lights.

Total fecal weight produced over a 24 h period was greater in the PS group compared to those in the LD group (P =  0.001, Table 2 in Supplementary S2 File). Additionally, a significant interaction between diet and light exposure was observed (P =  0.008, Fig 3B), with mice exposed to PS and fed a HF diet producing the greatest amount of feces by weight. The differences in fecal weight contributed to differences in corticosterone output levels, which were significantly affected by both light exposure and physiological stage (P < 0.05, Table 2 in Supplementary S2 File). Overall, corticosterone output levels were higher in the PS group compared to the LD group. Furthermore, there was a tendency (P =  0.068, Fig 3C) for an interaction between light exposure and period of the day, with PS treatment showing a near-significant increase in corticosterone levels at night compared to the day. Additionally, this trend suggests that corticosterone levels were higher at night under PS treatment compared to the LD treatment during the same period (Fig 3C).

Dam weight, circulating prolactin, TG and HbA1c

The impact of HF diet on dam weight was assessed at the end of the prepregnancy period and on lactation day 12. Although overall dam weight was significantly increased by the HF diet (P =  0.041, Table 3 in Supplementary S2 File), post-hoc analysis indicated that this was more stage specific. Dams were heavier on lactation d12 compared to the pre-pregnancy period (P <  0.001, Table 3 in Supplementary S2 File), and a significant interaction between diet and stage was observed (P =  0.026, Fig 4). After 4 weeks of pre-pregnancy diet feeding, mice on the HF diet weighed more than those on a CON. However, by lactation d12 there was no difference in weight between dams on HF and CON diets.

Fig 4. Interaction of diet and physiological stage (pre-pregnancy and lactation d12) on dam’s weight.

Fig 4

Control (CON) mice were fed a diet of 10% fat, and high-fat (HF) diet were fed a diet of 60% fat. Values are LS means ±  SEM. Mice were fed respective diets ad libitum 4 weeks before mating. Neonates were euthanized on lactation day 12. Interaction diet*physiological stage had a P-value of 0.026. Brackets indicate significant difference at P < 0.001 between diets within pre-pregnancy. Uppercase indicates a difference between CON diet, and lowercase indicating a difference between HF diet across the stages.

PS treatment, which began with mating confirmation, had no effect on final maternal weight. Neither PS treatment, nor diet impacted circulating levels of prolactin, TG or HbA1c in dam’s plasma on lactation day 12 (P > 0.05, Table 3 in Supplementary S2 File).

Nutritional composition of milk

Dams were milked on lactation day 12 to determine the impact of HF diet and PS treatment on milk lactose, protein and TG content. Neither diet nor PS treatment impacted levels of TG and protein in milk (P > 0.05, Table 4 in Supplementary S2 File). Diet had an overall effect on lactose level, with the HF fed animals having greater milk lactose content (P =  0.007, Table 4 in Supplementary S2 File). A significant interaction between diet and light was observed for milk lactose levels (P =  0.037, Fig 5). In the CON diet group, mice treated with PS light had lower milk lactose levels compared to those in the LD treatment. However, in the HF diet group, chronic jet lag exposure had no effect on milk lactose levels. Across diets, there was no difference in milk lactose concentration for mice exposed to LD light. However, mice exposed to PS light had higher milk lactose levels when fed the HF diet than CON diet.

Fig 5. Impact of diet and light on milk lactose.

Fig 5

LD, regular cycles of 12 hours of light and 12 hours of dark, and PS, mice exposed to 6-hour shifts in light-dark cycles every three days. Control (CON) mice were fed a diet of 10% fat, and high-fat (HF) diet were fed a diet of 60% fat. Values are LS means ±  SEM. Interaction diet*light had a P-value of 0.037. Different letters indicate significant difference at P < 0.001, with uppercase indicating a difference between LD, and lowercase indicating a difference between PS.

Litter weight, birth litter size, weight suckle weight, time of day of birth and pup survival to 24 h

The impact of HF diet and PS treatment on birth litter size and time of day of birth was assessed by checking cages twice daily at 0600 and 1800 to determine if parturition occurred during the night (1800-0600) or day (1800-0600) and number of neonates born. Neonates were counted 24 h later, to determine survival, and then litters were standardized to 8 neonates per dam. Neither HF diet nor PS treatment affected birth litter size. Pup survival to 24 h was also not affected by diet nor chronic jet lag exposure (P > 0.05, Table 5 in Supplementary S2 File). There was a tendency (P =  0.056, Fig 6A) for chronic jet lag exposure to influence the time of day of birth, but diet had no effect on time of day of birth (P =  0.41, Fig 6B). In the LD group, 70.6% of births occurred during the day, whereas in the PS group, only 37.5% of births occurred during the day. The impact of HF diet and PS treatment on milk production levels was measured using weigh-suckle-weigh (WSW) on lactation day 10. There was no effect by maternal diet nor PS exposure on weight of milk produced (P > 0.05, Table 5 in Supplementary S2 File).

Fig 6. Interaction between light and time of day (TOD) of birth (A) and interaction between diet and time of day (TOD) of birth (B).

Fig 6

LD, regular cycles of 12 hours of light and 12 hours of dark, and PS, mice exposed to 6-hour shifts in light-dark cycles every three days. Control (CON) mice were fed a diet of 10% fat, and high-fat (HF) diet were fed a diet of 60% fat. Values are LS means ±  SEM. Significance was determined using a Chi-square test at a P < 0.05. Interaction light*time of day of birth had a P-value of 0.056 and diet*time had a P-value of 0.407. “Day” refers to the period from 0600 to 1800, and “night” refers to 1800 to 0600, regardless of the light pattern in the PS group.

To assess the impact of diet and PS exposure on litter weight, litter weight was measured every 2 days. Litter weight was significantly affected by diet (P < 0.001, Table 5 in Supplementary S2 File). By lactation d12, the mean litter weight across all treatments was 74.25 g, compared to 13.81 g on the day of birth (0d) (P < 0.0001). This resulted in a significant interaction (P < 0.0001) between diet and day with HF diet markedly increasing litter weight from day 8 to day 12 (Fig 7).

Fig 7. Impact of phase shift (PS) and high-fat (HF) diet on litter weight.

Fig 7

LD, regular cycles of 12 hours of light and 12 hours of dark, and PS, mice exposed to 6-hour shifts in light-dark cycles every three days. Control (CON) mice were fed a diet of 10% fat, and high-fat (HF) diet were fed a diet of 60% fat. Values are LS means ±  SEM.

Lipid profiles of liver, mammary, milk and plasma

Scores plots of principal component analysis (PCA) demonstrate that diet, but not chronic jet lag exposure, had a profound effect on lipid profiles of the liver, mammary gland, milk and plasma (Fig 8).

Fig 8. PCA of lipid profiles in liver, mammary gland, milk, and plasma affected by diet but not by light.

Fig 8

Red and green represent CON and HF diet, respectively, while triangles and circles represent the PS and LD treatment, respectively.

Linear model analysis of the overall effect of diet revealed that among 1204 lipids detected in the screening phase, diet altered 67.1% in milk, 58.1% in mammary gland, 27.2% in the liver, and 10.9% in plasma at P-adj < 0.05 (Table 1).

Table 1. Percentage of lipids affected by diet in liver, mammary gland, milk, and plasma based on linear model analysis.

Liver Mammary Milk Plasma
n % n % n % n %
Different at P-adj < 0.05 328 27.2 700 58.1 808 67.1 131 10.9
Not different 876 72.8 504 41.9 396 32.9 1073 89.1
Total 1204 100 1204 100 1204 100 1204 100

Linear model analysis of the overall effect of diet showed that diet significantly altered 67.1% of lipids in milk, 58.1% in mammary gland, 27.2% in liver, and 10.9% in plasma (P-adj <  0.05). The color/gray shades represent the highest to the lowest percentage of differentially expressed lipids, indicating their proportion relative to the total lipids analyzed.

Across all tissues-matrices HF diet had the greatest impact on TG class of lipids, both increasing and decreasing abundance of individual species (Table 2). In liver, mammary and milk HF diet increased a relatively large proportion diacylglycerol (DG), whereas in the plasma the distribution of this class of lipids was relatively unchanged. In the liver the relative distribution of 15.05% of PC, 9.22% of PE and 7.28% PI lipids were decreased by HF diet. In the mammary gland 20.45% of PC lipids were decreased by HF, and 16.96% of PC and 15.90% of PE were decreased in milk. In plasma, 32.47% of PC lipid species were decreased (Table 2).

Table 2. Distribution of lipid classes affected by diet in liver, mammary gland, milk, and plasma of mice fed with HF or CON diet according to linear model analysis.

Liver Mammary gland Milk Plasma
HF>CON CON>HF HF>CON CON>HF HF>CON CON>HF HF>CON CON>HF
n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n %
TG 51 41.80 109 52.91 243 50.63 83 37.73 283 53.90 107 37.81 26 48.15 13 16.88
CE 3 2.46 2 0.97 2 0.42 2 0.91 2 0.38 17 6.01 0 0.00 4 5.19
Cer 4 3.28 1 0.49 4 0.83 2 0.91 1 0.19 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.30
SM 8 6.56 11 5.34 3 0.63 12 5.45 1 0.19 15 5.30 9 16.67 9 11.69
DG 39 31.97 12 5.83 165 34.38 22 10.00 181 34.48 14 4.95 0 0.00 4 5.19
PC 7 5.74 31 15.05 9 1.88 45 20.45 5 0.95 48 16.96 8 14.81 25 32.47
PE 5 4.10 19 9.22 6 1.25 17 7.73 2 0.38 45 15.90 8 14.81 6 7.79
PI 1 0.82 15 7.28 4 0.83 9 4.09 4 0.76 10 3.53 2 3.70 15 19.48
PS 2 1.64 5 2.43 1 0.21 13 5.91 3 0.57 14 4.95 1 1.85 0 0.00
PG 0 0.00 0 0.00 42 8.75 10 4.55 42 8.00 9 3.18 0 0.00 0 0.00
AC 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.21 2 0.91 1 0.19 3 1.06 0 0.00 0 0.00
FFA 2 1.64 1 0.49 0 0.00 3 1.36 0 0.00 1 0.35 0 0.00 0 0.00
Total 122 100 206 100 480 100 220 100 525 100 283 100 54 100 77 100

% Calculation: The percentage of lipids in each class was calculated by multiplying the number of lipids identified in each class by 100, then dividing by the total number of lipids detected. Bold percentages highlight the most affected lipid classes in each matrix. Full names of lipid categories include triacylglycerols (TG), ceramides (Cer), cholesteryl ester (CE), sphingomyelins (SM), diacylglycerols (DG), phosphatidylcholines (PC), phosphatidylethanolamines (PE), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylserines (PS), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), acyl-carnitines (AC), and free fatty acids (FFA). “HF>CON” indicates that lipids are increased in the HF group compared to the CON group. “CON>HF” indicates that lipids are increased in the CON group compared to the HF group.

The impact of diet on total carbon length and number of unsaturated bonds across the fatty acyl groups within each lipid class and by tissue/matrix were analyzed to gain an understanding of how dams on a HF versus CON diet vary in these lipid characteristics. HF diet increased the percentage of DG in liver with total carbons across the two-fatty acyl ≤  31 and between 37 to 40. HF diet also increased the percent of DG with higher degree of unsaturation compared to those in the CON group (Fig 9). Whereas dams on CON diets had a greater distribution of DG with 32 and 34 carbons and one unsaturated bond across the two fatty acyl groups.

Fig 9. Effects of HF diet on distribution of lipid classes in the liver, mammary gland, milk and plasma by total carbon chain length and degree of unsaturation.

Fig 9

In the mammary gland, mice fed HF diet exhibited a higher proportion of TG lipid class with longer carbon chains, ranging from 50 to 59, whereas those on a CON diet had a higher proportion of TG with ≤ 48 carbons. Additionally, HF diet increased the degree of unsaturation of TG lipids compared to mice on CON diets (Fig 9). HF diet also shifted distribution of DG in the mammary gland, with a greater proportion of 34 to 40 carbons, in contrast to the 37 to 44 carbon range observed in the CON diet group (Fig 9). Despite this alteration, the pattern of unsaturation of DG lipids in the mammary gland, remained largely similar to CON diet, although with a reduction in proportion and a slight increase noted for unsaturation of 3 to 5, 10, and 11.

Diet influenced milk TG total carbon number length across fatty acyl groups. Chains primarily ranged from 42 to 48 carbons in milk of mice fed CON diet, and in milk of mice on HF diet total carbon length were primarily greater than 50 (Fig 9). Diet also altered the distribution of milk TG by total number of unsaturated bonds, transitioning from a predominance of 0 to 4 unsaturation in the CON diet to 6 to 8 in milk of mice fed HF diet. Diacylglycerols comprised 34.48% of the total lipids altered in milk by HF diet (Table 2). Analysis revealed a U-shape distribution of DGs with a greater relative abundance in the HF group, with predominant degrees of unsaturation being 1, 2, 3, 8, and 9, and chain lengths ranging from 24 to 40 carbons (Fig 9). In contrast, DGs in CON groups displayed a different profile, characterized by a mix of saturated and unsaturated forms, with unsaturation levels primarily at 0, 1, 7, and 8, and longer chain lengths of 41 to 44 carbons.

Diet significantly impacted the TG composition in the plasma of mice, with those on the HF diet exhibiting longer carbon chains, ranging from 53 to 57 carbons across the three fatty acyl groups, and a higher prevalence of unsaturated bonds, with 6 to 8 double bonds (Fig 9). In contrast, TG of CON fed mice had shorter carbon chains, ranging from 48 to 53 carbons, and a different unsaturation profile, predominantly featuring 1, 2, and 9 double bonds. In plasma from mice fed the HF diet, a greater number of the total PC species profiled were significantly reduced compared to CON group. The PC species more abundant in plasma of HF mice had carbon chains ranging from 35 to 38 carbons and number of unsaturated bonds were 1, 2, and 4 across the two acyl molecules (Fig 9). In contrast, PC species more abundant in the CON group had carbon chains of 20 and 38 carbons, with 0 and 1 unsaturated bonds.

Linear regression analysis indicated no significant effect of chronic jet lag exposure on lipid profiles across all samples. Therefore, we tested whether within each diet lipid profiles differed between LD and PS treated mice using t-test. Differences in relative abundance of lipids between LD and PS mice became apparent only after reducing the stringency to raw P-value <  0.05 (Table 3). Within CON diet, PS treatment significantly altered the abundance of 6.5%, 3.2%, 2.9%, and 0.6% of lipids profiled in plasma, mammary gland, liver and milk (Table 3). Within the HF diet, 11.7%, 1.9%, 0.9%, and 0.9% in mammary gland, plasma, liver and milk, respectively.

Table 3. Comparison of significant lipid changes in various matrices under different LD and PS within HF and CON diets.

CON LD-PS HF LD-PS
Liver Mammary Milk Plasma Liver Mammary Milk Plasma
FDR P < 0.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Raw P < 0.05 35 (2.9%) 33 (3.2%) 6 (0.6%) 67 (6.5%) 11 (0.9%) 120 (11.7%) 9 (0.9%) 19 (1.9%)
Total 1204 (100%) 1204 (100%) 1204 (100%) 1204 (100%) 1204 (100%) 1204 (100%) 1204 (100%) 1204 (100%)

One-factor analysis, T-test with raw P-value 0 < 0.05. Significant lipid species are described in supplementary S3 File.

No patterns in lipids modified by chronic jet lag exposure within the CON diet group were observed for any tissue-matrices (Supplementary S4 File). PS treatment in the HF diet group altered the relative distribution of 120 lipids in mammary gland, of which 95% were decreased in abundance, whereas, in the CON diet group, PS treatment affected 33 lipids, with 78.8% showing increased abundance. Of the lipids reduced by PS treatment within HF diet, 45 were PC and 32 PE (Fig 10A). In contrast, these same lipid classes were increased by PS with CON diet, which 7 were PC and 12 were PE (Fig 10B).

Fig 10. Distribution of downregulated and upregulated lipids in mammary gland under PS within the HF or CON diet (A, B) and lipid classes downregulated in HF-PS and upregulated in CON-PS highlight the consistent effect of PS treatment across diets (C, D).

Fig 10

The response to PS treatment was clearly influenced by the HF diet, as different lipid classes were downregulated in one diet but upregulated in the other, demonstrating light-diet interactions based on relative amount. To identify the consistent impact of PS treatment regardless of the diet, we analyzed lipids, from the most abundant classes, that were downregulated in the HF-PS group and upregulated in the CON-PS group within the PC and PE classes using the Venny 2.1 tool [41]. This comparison explicitly shows the diet by light interaction (Fig 10C and 10D). For the PC class, we found four lipid species and their isobars that were consistently affected by PS treatment, regardless of the diet (Fig 10C and Table 4). Similarly, for the PE class, we identified eight lipids and their isobars that were similar under both diets (Fig 10D and Table 4).

Table 4. Impact of PS treatment on lipid species and their isobars in the PC and PE classes across different diets.

Tentative attribution Parent ion (m/z) Product ion (m/z)
PC(14:0), LPC(15:0), LPC(O-16:0) 482.4 184.1
PC(33:3), PC(O-34:3), PC(P-34:2) 742.6 184.1
PC(42:4) 866.7 184.1
PC(44:5) 892.7 184.1
PE(33:2), PE(O-34:2), PE(P-34:1) 702.5 561.5
PE(37:3), PE(O-38:3), PE(P-38:2) 756.6 615.6
PE(39:6), PE(O-40:6), PE(P-40:5) 778.6 637.6
PE(41:6), PE(O-42:6) 806.6 665.6
PE(42:10), PE(41:3), PE(P-42:2) 812.6 671.6
PE(42:5) 822.6 681.6
PE(42:8), PE(41:1), PE(O-42:1), PE(P-42:0) 816.7 675.7
PE(44:4) 852.6 711.6

Lipids shown in this table were downregulated in the HF-PS group and upregulated in the CON-PS group, with a focus on the PC and PE classes. These trends were identified using the Venny 2.1 tool and are also depicted in Fig 10.

Discussion

Maternal adaptations to pregnancy and lactation can be modified by the female’s environment and nutrition, impacting the development of their offspring. Herein we described the impact of a circadian disrupting environment and high-fat diet on maternal physiology-lipidome, milk composition and neonate outcomes. Our primary findings include alteration in maternal feed intake, fecal corticosterone and milk lactose levels by both diet and circadian disrupting environments. Within the CON diet group, milk lactose levels of PS mice decreased, while mice on a HF diet produced milk with greater lactose content than those on a CON diet. Additionally, corticosterone levels were elevated for PS group across all physiological periods—early pregnancy, late pregnancy and lactation. HF diet increased litter weight during lactation and profoundly impacted the distribution of lipid profiles in dams’ liver, plasma, mammary and milk, increasing abundance of both longer and shorter chains and altering levels of double bonds. The shifts in lipid profiles induced by HF diet likely reflect the greater dependence on lipids from diet to support energetic needs of dam and milk fat production. Whereas although PS treatment had no overall effect on lipid profiles, there was diet by chronic jet lag exposure interaction on the PC and PE lipids in the mammary gland. The PS treatment tended to increase the number of births during the night hours. Moreover, HF diet consumption significantly decreased overall feed intake and increased fecal weight.

The reduction in feed intake by the HF diet was expected and agrees with our previous study that found the same changes in eating behavior [42], indicating less of a need of mice to eat to support pregnancy and lactation when given an energy dense diet. The HF diet increased lactose levels in the milk of dams. This finding is consistent with our previous report [43] and may reflect a more concentrated milk (lower percent of water). However, lack of an effect of diet on milk protein or TG concentration does not support this interpretation. Alternatively, the HF diet may have provided greater substrates for lactose synthesis. The HF diet supplies more glycerol, a primary substrate for gluconeogenesis. In the mammary gland, glucose derived from gluconeogenesis is converted to galactose, which is then used for lactose synthesis [4346]. Glycerol may have also been sourced from the greater energy stores of the HF mice, which weighed more than CON mice at the onset of pregnancy. These HF mice appeared to mobilize their fat stores to support energetic needs throughout the experiment, as evident by the lack of weight difference between the diet groups at the end of the study [42].

In addition to the overall effect of HF diet on elevating milk lactose, the significant diet by light interaction indicated that within the CON group the PS treatment significantly reduced milk lactose concentration. Circadian rhythms play a role in regulating milk production, and our group has previously shown that continuous light exposure, which disrupts circadian clocks, decreased lactose synthesis [42]. Our previous studies also showed a circadian rhythm of LALBA expression, a key component of the lactose synthase enzyme [47]. Work of others demonstrated circadian rhythms of lactose synthesis [4850]. Therefore, circadian disrupting environments may depress milk lactose content. If these findings translate to humans, decreased lactose content of breast milk may negatively impact infants, as the lactose content of milk functions to promote neurological development of neonates and establishment of a healthy microbiome [51].

The higher fecal weight observed in the interaction of the HF diet and PS treatment may be due to the increased feed intake caused by circadian disruption. Mice in the PS group exhibited higher feed intake during the daytime, indicating a shift in feeding patterns due to circadian rhythm disruption. Although weight gain due to disrupted feeding patterns in the PS group was anticipated, it was only observed in the HF group. Similar to our previous study [42], the dams on the HF diet gained more weight, in the pre-pregnancy phase. The high caloric density of the HF diet led to increased body weight and fat accumulation. Additionally, hormonal changes involving corticosterone, leptin and insulin can influence energy balance and promote weight gain [52,53]. Obesity in females can negatively impact fertility by disrupting hormonal balance, impairing ovulation, and altering reproductive function leading to suboptimal outcomes [5456]. Although, there was no effect of diet on fecal corticosterone concentration or total output, our previous studies found the HF diet increased fecal corticosterone output and hair corticosterone levels, both at the end of the pre-pregnancy period and on lactation day 12 [31,57].

While we did not observe changes in milk production levels at the single weigh-suckle-weigh experiment on lactation day 10, the increased lactose concentration in milk of the HF group may have contributed to the higher litter weight, as lactose serves as a vital energy source for neonates supplying a substantial portion of the calories required for growth and development [58]. Although not different in this study, our previous study found a higher percent fat in milk of HF fed dams [43]. The HF milk as a calorie-dense food has the potential to increase growth rate of litters as well as provide bioactive lipids that support and optimize litter development [59].

The PS treatment disrupted the normal corticosterone fluctuations associated with the physiological transitions of the dam from early to late pregnancy and into lactation. Mice exposed to a 12-hour LD cycle showed changes in fecal corticosterone concentration between these stages, reflecting the hormonal adjustments necessary for impending parturition [60]. During pregnancy, elevated levels of estrogen and progesterone influence the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, resulting in an increase of corticosterone production [6062]. Typically, there is a suppression of the HPA axis during lactation period to mitigate stress responses that could interfere with maternal behaviors, thereby protecting the offspring from elevated stress hormone levels in the milk and leading to lower corticosterone levels [6367]. Such changes are essential for the healthy development of the offspring [68]. However, dams exposed to constant shifts in the photoperiod due to PS treatment exhibited persistently high corticosterone concentrations, which remained unchanged across the reproductive phases. This pattern potentially indicates a chronic stress response, as constant circadian or ultradian rhythm disruption can dysregulate the HPA axis. Consequently, this dysregulation results in sustained elevated corticosterone levels, through elevated glucocorticoids, which can impair the negative feedback mechanisms that typically regulate the HPA axis or increase adrenal sensitivity to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) [6971]. Such alterations in corticosterone rhythms may disrupt metabolic processes, increase the risk of metabolic disorders, suppress immune function, and negatively impact various aspects of reproduction and maternal care [69,70,72]. Additionally, these disruptions can have long-term effects on offspring development and behavior [31,42,72]. A study of mice found antenatal treatment of exogenous glucocorticoids out-of-phase with maternal endogenous circadian rhythm increased their offspring anxiety as well as impaired their stress coping stress-axis regulation [73]. In humans, preterm infants born to women who received antenatal glucocorticoids in the evening had lower stress compensatory capacity at 5 years of age than those born to women who received treatments within the endogenous circadian rhythm of glucocorticoids [73].

Exploratory analysis of organ (liver and mammary) and matrix (plasma and milk) lipid profiles indicated that HF diet significantly altered lipid content. Maternal intake of HF diet increased the number of carbons in TG found in the plasma, mammary gland, and milk, as well as in the DG of the liver and PC of the plasma. In contrast, animals on CON diet had a greater prevalence of DG with a higher number of carbons across fatty acyl group in the mammary gland and milk. These results suggest that the HF diet suppress de novo lipogenesis, while simultaneously increasing desaturation, which alter the lipid profile by enhancing the incorporation of fatty acids into different types of lipids in the body, thereby influencing the overall lipid composition and metabolism [74]. Although the expected outcome is the suppression of both de novo lipogenesis and desaturation, and maintains or even increases the elongation of fatty acids [75], the observed increase in desaturation may occur in response to the abundance of dietary fat, which provides more substrates for desaturation enzymes.

Relative to animals on CON diet, HF diet increased fatty acid (FA) length in the TG lipid class but decreased length in the DG lipid class in the mammary gland and milk. The mammary gland primarily synthesizes fatty acids de novo that are less than or equal to 16 carbons, resulting in shorter FA chains incorporated into TG due to the high affinity of diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) for these substrates [76,77]. DG are intermediates to TG and phospholipid synthesis [78], with the metabolic channeling in the mammary gland primarily directing longer-chain DGs toward phospholipid synthesis, essential for the milk fat globule membrane structure [76]. HF diet can lead to lipid remodeling in mammary gland, including elongation and desaturation of fatty acids (FA) through enzymes such as stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD1) and elongases [79,80]. The elongation of C16 fatty acids to very long-chain fatty acids (C18 or longer) occurs through ELOVL-mediated chain elongation [81,82]. Other studies have shown that the HF diet induces ELOVL expression [82] or enhances the elongation flux from C16 to C18:1 [83]. These changes in FA distribution in TG and DG in response to HF diet, as indicated by total carbon length and unsaturation, likely reflects the metabolic intermediates and final products.

Changing the FA chain lengths in TG and DG in milk can have significant consequences for neonates, potentially predisposing them to metabolic disorders or obesity later in life [84]. Longer-chain FA in TG increase the energy density of milk, leading to higher caloric intake, faster weight gain, and potentially long-term effects on body composition and metabolic health [85,86]. In contrast, shorter-chain FA in DG are more easily digested, whereas longer-chain FA in TG reduce fat absorption efficiency, potentially causing gastrointestinal discomfort or malabsorption issues [87]. Neonates, especially those with fatty acid oxidation disorders, might experience an increased risk of metabolic decompensation and accumulation of toxic metabolites in mitochondria [88,89]. Additionally, longer-chain FA in TG reduce the availability of medium-chain FA for rapid ketogenesis, which can impact brain development, as ketones are vital for neonatal brains [90]. Alterations in FA chain lengths can also affect milk fat globule membrane structure, changing the bioavailability of membrane-associated nutrients and the stability of milk fat globules, which in turn affects digestion and absorption [9193].

Circadian disruption as imposed by the chronic jet-lag model [94], impacts the molecular and physiological processes across the body causing a misalignment in the timing of biological functions that are usually synchronized with the light-dark cycle and profoundly affect metabolic homeostasis to include lipid and glucose metabolism [9597]. In addition, disrupting the normal feeding-fasting cycle also affects lipid metabolism [98]. Our study revealed that lipid class PC and PE were impacted by the PS treatment, in a diet specific manner, reducing several species under HF diet and increasing under CON diet across all matrices. PC and PE are the major phospholipids in the membrane, comprising 45–55% and 15–25%, respectively. While PC is primarily associated with maintaining the integrity and functionality of the plasma membrane, PE plays a critical role within cytoplasmic lipid droplets and contributes to various metabolic processes [99]. Hepatic phospholipids, including PC and PE, decrease under HF diet conditions in mice with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), a condition associated with high oxidative stress and liver damage [99]. In the mammary gland, the biosynthesis of PC and PE involves the CDP-choline (Kennedy) pathway and the phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEMT) pathway [76,100]. Enzymes such as diacylglycerol choline/ethanolamine phosphotransferase (CEPT) and choline kinase α (CKα), all crucial in the Kennedy pathway, are influenced by diet, and hormonal changes during lactation, and possibly circadian rhythms [76,100,101]. Disruptions in these pathways, by circadian disrupting environments like the PS treatment, may influence the nutrient composition of milk, and impact pup growth and development [91,101,102].

Chronic jet-lag exposure affected four lipids in the PC class and eight in the PE class, regardless of the diet. Notably, some lipids contained odd-chain fatty acids (OCFA) and ether lipids. OCFA are less common in mammals and form through processes like the use of propionyl-CoA, or obtained through dietary sources [102] or alpha-oxidation of even-chain fatty acids [103]. The observed reduction in ether lipids, particularly those with longer carbon chains, suggests an increase in oxidative stress, as ether lipids play a crucial role in resisting lipid peroxidation and scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) [104,105]. Heightened oxidative stress can damage cells, negatively impacting milk production and quality, and potentially leading to impaired pup growth, weakened immune systems, and hindered cognitive development [106109]. These findings imply that PS exposure might exacerbate oxidative stress in the mammary gland under HF diet conditions, highlighting the importance of lipid composition in maternal and neonatal health that may influence long-term health outcomes.

A limitation of this study is that the dams were weighed after the cardiac puncture, following the collection of approximately 1 mL of blood. This may have introduced variability in the recorded weights, as differences in blood volume collected could contribute to differences in the measurements. While the impact of this variability is likely small, it should be considered when interpreting the data. Also, while circadian disruption was induced through the chronic jet lag model, which is a well-established method for altering circadian rhythms [31,42,47], we did not directly measure the impact on circadian rhythms (e.g., clock gene expression or locomotor activity) in this study. This represents a limitation, as direct assessments of circadian function would provide stronger evidence of disruption.

Conclusion

Our investigation explored the complex interaction between high-fat diet and exposure to circadian-disrupting light-dark phase shifts on various physiological parameters in pregnant and lactating mice that may contribute to the negative observations in offspring development in response to their exposure. High-fat diet and circadian disrupting PS treatment both altered feeding behavior. Dams subjected to HF showed reduced feed intake compared to CON group, while gaining more weight pre-pregnancy and showing no significant difference in weight at the end of lactation. PS increased feed intake without changes in dam or litter weight, suggests a decrease in metabolic efficiency. Maternal fecal corticosterone levels varied across early and late pregnancy and into lactation, however when dams were exposed to PS, corticosterone levels did not vary across physiological stage, remaining relatively elevated and indicating a greater exposure to stress throughout pregnancy and lactation. Lactose content of milk increased in response to HF diet, however in the CON group PS exposure decreased lactose content. Although birth litter size and pup survival were not affected by chronic jet lag exposure, there was a tendency for PS births to occur at night, supporting circadian system influences on the timing of parturition. HF diet profoundly impacted lipid profiles, with alterations supporting evidence for a greater dependence on dietary fats and their elongation and desaturation as well as oxidative damage across all tissues and matrices. Lipidome profiles also indicated PS exposure may increase oxidative stress damage due to reducing PC and PE lipid classes levels as well as potentially reducing their ether lipids. The changes in maternal variables likely reflect her health and metabolic status and affect the nutritional and developmental environment of offspring, and findings here may provide insight into the impact of maternal nutrition and environment on fetal and neonate development.

Supporting information

S1 File. MRMs profiled in the screening phase.

(XLSX)

pone.0320538.s001.xlsx (134.1KB, xlsx)
S2 File. Supplementary tables.

(DOCX)

pone.0320538.s002.docx (28KB, docx)
S3 File. Description of significant lipids changes in each matrix under LD and PS within HF and CON diets.

(XLSX)

pone.0320538.s003.xlsx (27.4KB, xlsx)
S4 File. Lipids modified by chronic jet lag exposure within the CON diet group.

(DOCX)

pone.0320538.s004.docx (30KB, docx)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors would like to thank the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) by the financial support given to Leriana Garcia Reis (Grant nº 2021/12819-0). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. https://fapesp.br/en.

References

  • 1.Lunn RM, Blask DE, Coogan AN, Figueiro MG, Gorman MR, Hall JE, et al. Health consequences of electric lighting practices in the modern world: A report on the National Toxicology Program’s workshop on shift work at night, artificial light at night, and circadian disruption. Sci Total Environ. 2017;607–608:1073–84. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Smolensky MH, Hermida RC, Reinberg A, Sackett-Lundeen L, Portaluppi F. Circadian disruption: New clinical perspective of disease pathology and basis for chronotherapeutic intervention. Chronobiol Int. 2016;33(8):1101–19. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2016.1184678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gangwisch JE. Epidemiological evidence for the links between sleep, circadian rhythms and metabolism. Obes Rev. 2009;10 Suppl 2(0 2):37–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00663.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sen A, Sellix MT. The Circadian Timing System and Environmental Circadian Disruption: From Follicles to Fertility. Endocrinology. 2016;157(9):3366–73. doi: 10.1210/en.2016-1450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rasmussen KM, Kjolhede CL. Maternal obesity: a problem for both mother and child. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(5):929–31. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Casey T, Sun H, Burgess HJ, Crodian J, Dowden S, Cummings S, et al. Delayed Lactogenesis II is Associated With Lower Sleep Efficiency and Greater Variation in Nightly Sleep Duration in the Third Trimester. J Hum Lact. 2019;35(4):713–24. doi: 10.1177/0890334419830991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Casey TM, Plaut K, Boerman J. Circadian clocks and their role in lactation competence. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2022;78:106680. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2021.106680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Casey TM, Plaut K. Circadian clocks and their integration with metabolic and reproductive systems: our current understanding and its application to the management of dairy cows. J Anim Sci. 2022;100(10):skac233. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Evans MC, Anderson GM. Integration of Circadian and Metabolic Control of Reproductive Function. Endocrinology. 2018;159(11):3661–73. doi: 10.1210/en.2018-00691 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sen A, Hoffmann HM. Role of core circadian clock genes in hormone release and target tissue sensitivity in the reproductive axis. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2020;501:110655. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2019.110655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Erren TC, Reiter RJ. Defining chronodisruption. Journal of Pineal Research. 2009;46(3):245–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-079x.2009.00665.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Varcoe TJ, Boden MJ, Voultsios A, Salkeld MD, Rattanatray L, Kennaway DJ. Characterisation of the maternal response to chronic phase shifts during gestation in the rat: implications for fetal metabolic programming. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gatford KL, Kennaway DJ, Liu H, Kleemann DO, Kuchel TR, Varcoe TJ. Simulated shift work disrupts maternal circadian rhythms and metabolism, and increases gestation length in sheep. J Physiol. 2019;597(7):1889–904. doi: 10.1113/JP277186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Varcoe TJ, Wight N, Voultsios A, Salkeld MD, Kennaway DJ. Chronic phase shifts of the photoperiod throughout pregnancy programs glucose intolerance and insulin resistance in the rat. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e18504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Smarr BL, Grant AD, Perez L, Zucker I, Kriegsfeld LJ. Maternal and Early-Life Circadian Disruption Have Long-Lasting Negative Consequences on Offspring Development and Adult Behavior in Mice. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):3326. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03406-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Young BE, Johnson SL, Krebs NF. Biological determinants linking infant weight gain and child obesity: current knowledge and future directions. Adv Nutr. 2012;3(5):675–86. doi: 10.3945/an.112.002238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sun B, Purcell RH, Terrillion CE, Yan J, Moran TH, Tamashiro KLK. Maternal high-fat diet during gestation or suckling differentially affects offspring leptin sensitivity and obesity. Diabetes. 2012;61(11):2833–41. doi: 10.2337/db11-0957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Samuelsson A-M, Matthews PA, Argenton M, Christie MR, McConnell JM, Jansen EHJM, et al. Diet-induced obesity in female mice leads to offspring hyperphagia, adiposity, hypertension, and insulin resistance: a novel murine model of developmental programming. Hypertension. 2008;51(2):383–92. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.101477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Elahi MM, Cagampang FR, Mukhtar D, Anthony FW, Ohri SK, Hanson MA. Long-term maternal high-fat feeding from weaning through pregnancy and lactation predisposes offspring to hypertension, raised plasma lipids and fatty liver in mice. Br J Nutr. 2009;102(4):514–9. doi: 10.1017/S000711450820749X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.de Paula Simino LA, de Fante T, Figueiredo Fontana M, Oliveira Borges F, Torsoni MA, Milanski M, et al. Lipid overload during gestation and lactation can independently alter lipid homeostasis in offspring and promote metabolic impairment after new challenge to high-fat diet. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2017;14:16. doi: 10.1186/s12986-017-0168-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Teeple K, Rajput P, Gonzalez M, Han-Hallett Y, Fernández-Juricic E, Casey T. High fat diet induces obesity, alters eating pattern and disrupts corticosterone circadian rhythms in female ICR mice. PLoS One. 2023;18(1):e0279209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reddy AB, Field MD, Maywood ES, Hastings MH. Differential resynchronisation of circadian clock gene expression within the suprachiasmatic nuclei of mice subjected to experimental jet lag. J Neurosci. 2002;22(17):7326–30. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-17-07326.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schwartz PB, Walcheck MT, Berres M, Nukaya M, Wu G, Carrillo ND, et al. Chronic jetlag-induced alterations in pancreatic diurnal gene expression. Physiol Genomics. 2021;53(8):319–35. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00022.2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Horsey EA, Maletta T, Turner H, Cole C, Lehmann H, Fournier NM. Chronic Jet Lag Simulation Decreases Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Enhances Depressive Behaviors and Cognitive Deficits in Adult Male Rats. Front Behav Neurosci. 2020;13:272. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bano-Otalora B, Madrid JA, Rol MA. Melatonin alleviates circadian system disruption induced by chronic shifts of the light-dark cycle in Octodon degus. J Pineal Res. 2020;68(1):e12619. doi: 10.1111/jpi.12619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gooley JJ. Circadian regulation of lipid metabolism. Proc Nutr Soc. 2016;75(4):440–50. doi: 10.1017/S0029665116000288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liu M, Zhang Z, Chen Y, Feng T, Zhou Q, Tian X. Circadian clock and lipid metabolism disorders: a potential therapeutic strategy for cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1292011. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1292011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sundaram S, Johnson LK, Yan L. High-Fat Diet Alters Circadian Rhythms in Mammary Glands of Pubertal Mice. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:349. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sato T, Sassone-Corsi P. Nutrition, metabolism, and epigenetics: pathways of circadian reprogramming. EMBO Rep. 2022;23(5):e52412. doi: 10.15252/embr.202152412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li X, Liu X, Meng Q, Wu X, Bing X, Guo N, et al. Circadian clock disruptions link oxidative stress and systemic inflammation to metabolic syndrome in obstructive sleep apnea patients. Front Physiol. 2022;13:932596. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.932596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.LLabre JE, Trujillo R, Sroga GE, Figueiro MG, Vashishth D. Circadian rhythm disruption with high-fat diet impairs glycemic control and bone quality. FASEB J. 2021;35(9):e21786. doi: 10.1096/fj.202100610RR [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tortoriello DV, McMinn J, Chua SC. Dietary-induced obesity and hypothalamic infertility in female DBA/2J mice. Endocrinology. 2004;145(3):1238–47. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-1406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.DePeters EJ, Hovey RC. Methods for collecting milk from mice. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2009;14(4):397–400. doi: 10.1007/s10911-009-9158-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Leary SL, Underwood W, Anthony R, Cartner S, Grandin T, Greenacre C, et al. AVMA guidelines for the euthanasia of animals: 2020 edition. American Veterinary Medical Association; 2020. Available: https://www.avma.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/Guidelines-on-Euthanasia-2020.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Feng W, Liu S, Zhang C, Xia Q, Yu T, Zhu D. Comparison of cerebral and cutaneous microvascular dysfunction with the development of type 1 diabetes. Theranostics. 2019;9(20):5854–68. doi: 10.7150/thno.33738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Han BG, Hao C-M, Tchekneva EE, Wang Y-Y, Lee CA, Ebrahim B, et al. Markers of glycemic control in the mouse: comparisons of 6-h- and overnight-fasted blood glucoses to Hb A1c. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008;295(4):E981-6. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90283.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dan K, Fujita H, Seto Y, Kato R. Relation between stable glycated hemoglobin A1C and plasma glucose levels in diabetes-model mice. Exp Anim. 1997;46(2):135–40. doi: 10.1538/expanim.46.135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.BLIGH EG, DYER WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959;37(8):911–7. doi: 10.1139/o59-099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Conroy MJ, Andrews RM, Andrews S, Cockayne L, Dennis EA, Fahy E, et al. LIPID MAPS: update to databases and tools for the lipidomics community. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(D1):D1677–82. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pang Z, Lu Y, Zhou G, Hui F, Xu L, Viau C, et al. MetaboAnalyst 6.0: towards a unified platform for metabolomics data processing, analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(W1):W398–406. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Touma C, Palme R, Sachser N. Analyzing corticosterone metabolites in fecal samples of mice: a noninvasive technique to monitor stress hormones. Horm Behav. 2004;45(1):10–22. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2003.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Touma C, Sachser N, Möstl E, Palme R. Effects of sex and time of day on metabolism and excretion of corticosterone in urine and feces of mice. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2003;130(3):267–78. doi: 10.1016/s0016-6480(02)00620-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bioinformatics Group. Venny 2.1.0. n.d.
  • 44.Teeple K, Rajput P, Scinto S, Schoonmaker J, Davis C, Dinn M, et al. Impact of high-fat diet and exposure to constant light on reproductive competence of female ICR mice. Biol Open. 2023;12(10):bio060088. doi: 10.1242/bio.060088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen Y, Wang J, Yang S, Utturkar S, Crodian J, Cummings S, et al. Effect of high-fat diet on secreted milk transcriptome in midlactation mice. Physiol Genomics. 2017;49(12):747–62. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00080.2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sadovnikova A, Garcia SC, Hovey RC. A Comparative Review of the Cell Biology, Biochemistry, and Genetics of Lactose Synthesis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2021;26(2):181–96. doi: 10.1007/s10911-021-09490-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Shah AM, Wondisford FE. Tracking the carbons supplying gluconeogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(42):14419–29. doi: 10.1074/jbc.REV120.012758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.BARRY JM. Conversion of glucose to galactose in the mammary gland. Nature. 1952;169(4308):878–9. doi: 10.1038/169878a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Casey TM, Crodian J, Erickson E, Kuropatwinski KK, Gleiberman AS, Antoch MP. Tissue-specific changes in molecular clocks during the transition from pregnancy to lactation in mice. Biol Reprod. 2014;90(6):127. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.113.116137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Barkova EN, Nazarenko EV, Zhdanova EV. Diurnal variations in qualitative composition of breast milk in women with iron deficiency. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2005;140(4):394–6. doi: 10.1007/s10517-005-0500-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lubetzky R, Mimouni FB, Dollberg S, Salomon M, Mandel D. Consistent circadian variations in creamatocrit over the first 7 weeks of lactation: a longitudinal study. Breastfeed Med. 2007;2(1):15–8. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2006.0013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Villalpando S, del Prado-Manríquez M, Stafford J, Delgado G. Diurnal variations in the fatty acid composition of milk fat from marginally nourished women. Arch Med Res. 1995;26 Spec No:S139–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Grenov B, Briend A, Sangild PT, Thymann T, Rytter MH, Hother A-L, et al. Undernourished Children and Milk Lactose. Food Nutr Bull. 2016;37(1):85–99. doi: 10.1177/0379572116629024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Myers MG Jr, Leibel RL, Seeley RJ, Schwartz MW. Obesity and leptin resistance: distinguishing cause from effect. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21(11):643–51. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2010.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dallman MF, Pecoraro N, Akana SF, La Fleur SE, Gomez F, Houshyar H, et al. Chronic stress and obesity: a new view of “comfort food”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(20):11696–701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1934666100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Silvestris E, Lovero D, Palmirotta R. Nutrition and Female Fertility: An Interdependent Correlation. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:346. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dağ ZÖ, Dilbaz B. Impact of obesity on infertility in women. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2015;16(2):111–7. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2015.15232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zheng L, Yang L, Guo Z, Yao N, Zhang S, Pu P. Obesity and its impact on female reproductive health: unraveling the connections. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024;14:1326546. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1326546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Reis LG, Teeple K, Schoonmaker JL, Davis C, Scinto S, Schinckel A, et al. Constant light and high fat diet alter daily patterns of activity, feed intake and fecal corticosterone levels in pregnant and lactating female ICR mice. PLoS One. 2024;19(11):e0312419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Romero-Velarde E, Delgado-Franco D, García-Gutiérrez M, Gurrola-Díaz C, Larrosa-Haro A, Montijo-Barrios E, et al. The Importance of Lactose in the Human Diet: Outcomes of a Mexican Consensus Meeting. Nutrients. 2019;11(11):2737. doi: 10.3390/nu11112737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Pimentel L, Gomes A, Pintado M, Rodríguez-Alcalá LM. Isolation and Analysis of Phospholipids in Dairy Foods. J Anal Methods Chem. 2016;2016:9827369. doi: 10.1155/2016/9827369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.McMullin TS, Lowe ER, Bartels MJ, Marty MS. Dynamic changes in lipids and proteins of maternal, fetal, and pup blood and milk during perinatal development in CD and Wistar rats. Toxicol Sci. 2008;105(2):260–74. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfn124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sheng JA, Bales NJ, Myers SA, Bautista AI, Roueinfar M, Hale TM, et al. The Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis: Development, Programming Actions of Hormones, and Maternal-Fetal Interactions. Front Behav Neurosci. 2021;14:601939. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.601939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Brunton PJ, Russell JA, Douglas AJ. Adaptive responses of the maternal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis during pregnancy and lactation. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008;20(6):764–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01735.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Stern JM, Goldman L, Levine S. Pituitary-adrenal responsiveness during lactation in rats. Neuroendocrinology. 1973;12(3):179–91. doi: 10.1159/000122167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Neumann ID, Wigger A, Liebsch G, Holsboer F, Landgraf R. Increased basal activity of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis during pregnancy in rats bred for high anxiety-related behaviour. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1998;23(5):449–63. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4530(98)00023-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lightman SL, Windle RJ, Wood SA, Kershaw YM, Shanks N, Ingram CD. Peripartum plasticity within the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. Prog Brain Res. 2001;133:111–29. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(01)33009-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kammerer M, Adams D, Castelberg Bv B von, Glover V. Pregnant women become insensitive to cold stress. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2002;2(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-2-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.de Weerth C, Buitelaar JK. Physiological stress reactivity in human pregnancy--a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29(2):295–312. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Slattery DA, Neumann ID. No stress please! Mechanisms of stress hyporesponsiveness of the maternal brain. J Physiol. 2008;586(2):377–85. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.145896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Mohd Azmi NAS, Juliana N, Azmani S, Mohd Effendy N, Abu IF, Mohd Fahmi Teng NI, et al. Cortisol on Circadian Rhythm and Its Effect on Cardiovascular System. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2):676. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.O’Byrne NA, Yuen F, Butt WZ, Liu PY. Sleep and Circadian Regulation of Cortisol: A Short Review. Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res. 2021;18:178–86. doi: 10.1016/j.coemr.2021.03.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.den Boon FS, de Vries T, Baelde M, Joëls M, Karst H. Circadian and Ultradian Variations in Corticosterone Level Influence Functioning of the Male Mouse Basolateral Amygdala. Endocrinology. 2019;160(4):791–802. doi: 10.1210/en.2018-00767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wright KP Jr, Drake AL, Frey DJ, Fleshner M, Desouza CA, Gronfier C, et al. Influence of sleep deprivation and circadian misalignment on cortisol, inflammatory markers, and cytokine balance. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;47:24–34. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.01.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Ottestad I, Hassani S, Borge GI, Kohler A, Vogt G, Hyötyläinen T, et al. Fish oil supplementation alters the plasma lipidomic profile and increases long-chain PUFAs of phospholipids and triglycerides in healthy subjects. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Duarte JAG, Carvalho F, Pearson M, Horton JD, Browning JD, Jones JG, et al. A high-fat diet suppresses de novo lipogenesis and desaturation but not elongation and triglyceride synthesis in mice. J Lipid Res. 2014;55(12):2541–53. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M052308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Walter L, Narayana VK, Fry R, Logan A, Tull D, Leury B. Milk fat globule size development in the mammary epithelial cell: a potential role for ether phosphatidylethanolamine. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):12299. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69036-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Mohammad MA, Haymond MW. Regulation of lipid synthesis genes and milk fat production in human mammary epithelial cells during secretory activation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013;305(6):E700-16. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00052.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Yen C-LE, Stone SJ, Koliwad S, Harris C, Farese RV Jr. Thematic review series: glycerolipids. DGAT enzymes and triacylglycerol biosynthesis. J Lipid Res. 2008;49(11):2283–301. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R800018-JLR200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Flowers MT, Ntambi JM. Role of stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase in regulating lipid metabolism. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2008;19(3):248–56. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3282f9b54d [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Wang X, Yu H, Gao R, Liu M, Xie W. A comprehensive review of the family of very-long-chain fatty acid elongases: structure, function, and implications in physiology and pathology. Eur J Med Res. 2023;28(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01523-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Deák F, Anderson RE, Fessler JL, Sherry DM. Novel Cellular Functions of Very Long Chain-Fatty Acids: Insight From ELOVL4 Mutations. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:428. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kozawa S, Honda A, Kajiwara N, Takemoto Y, Nagase T, Nikami H, et al. Induction of peroxisomal lipid metabolism in mice fed a high-fat diet. Mol Med Rep. 2011;4(6):1157–62. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2011.560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Oosterveer MH, van Dijk TH, Tietge UJF, Boer T, Havinga R, Stellaard F, et al. High fat feeding induces hepatic fatty acid elongation in mice. PLoS One. 2009;4(6):e6066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Lean SC, Candia AA, Gulacsi E, Lee GCL, Sferruzzi-Perri AN. Obesogenic diet in mice compromises maternal metabolic physiology and lactation ability leading to reductions in neonatal viability. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2022;236(2):e13861. doi: 10.1111/apha.13861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Hanuš O, Samková E, Křížová L, Hasoňová L, Kala R. Role of Fatty Acids in Milk Fat and the Influence of Selected Factors on Their Variability-A Review. Molecules. 2018;23(7):1636. doi: 10.3390/molecules23071636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hua M-C, Su H-M, Yao T-C, Liao S-L, Tsai M-H, Su K-W, et al. The association between human milk fatty acid composition in mothers with an elevated body mass index and infant growth changes. Clin Nutr. 2024;43(1):203–10. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2023.11.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.den Besten G, van Eunen K, Groen AK, Venema K, Reijngoud D-J, Bakker BM. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J Lipid Res. 2013;54(9):2325–40. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R036012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Merritt JL 2nd, Norris M, Kanungo S. Fatty acid oxidation disorders. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(24):473. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.10.57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Marsden D, Bedrosian CL, Vockley J. Impact of newborn screening on the reported incidence and clinical outcomes associated with medium- and long-chain fatty acid oxidation disorders. Genet Med. 2021;23(5):816–29. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-01070-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Jadhav HB, Annapure US. Triglycerides of medium-chain fatty acids: a concise review. J Food Sci Technol. 2023;60(8):2143–52. doi: 10.1007/s13197-022-05499-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Chai C, Oh S, Imm J-Y. Roles of Milk Fat Globule Membrane on Fat Digestion and Infant Nutrition. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2022;42(3):351–71. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2022.e11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Thum C, Roy NC, Everett DW, McNabb WC. Variation in milk fat globule size and composition: A source of bioactives for human health. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023;63(1):87–113. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1944049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Maheshwari A, Mantry H, Bagga N, Frydrysiak-Brzozowska A, Badarch J, Rahman MM. Milk Fat Globules: 2024 Updates. Newborn (Clarksville). 2024;3(1):19–37. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-11002-0085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Suarez-Trujillo A, Wernert G, Sun H, Steckler TS, Huff K, Cummings S, et al. Exposure to chronic light-dark phase shifts during the prepartum nonlactating period attenuates circadian rhythms, decreases blood glucose, and increases milk yield in the subsequent lactation. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103(3):2784–99. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Casey T, Suarez-Trujillo AM, McCabe C, Beckett L, Klopp R, Brito L, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals disruption of circadian rhythms in late gestation dairy cows may increase risk for fatty liver and reduced mammary remodeling. Physiol Genomics. 2021;53(11):441–55. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00028.2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Klopp RN, Ferreira CR, Casey TM, Boerman JP. Relationship of cow and calf circulating lipidomes with colostrum lipid composition and metabolic status of the cow. Journal of Dairy Science. 2022;105(2):1768–87. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Beckett LM, Donkin SS, Casey T. Circadian disruption decreases gluconeogenic flux in late-gestation, nonlactating dairy cows. JDS Commun. 2023;4(5):412–6. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2022-0353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Chaix A, Zarrinpar A. The effects of time-restricted feeding on lipid metabolism and adiposity. Adipocyte. 2015;4(4):319–24. doi: 10.1080/21623945.2015.1025184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Cockcroft S. Mammalian lipids: structure, synthesis and function. Essays Biochem. 2021;65(5):813–45. doi: 10.1042/EBC20200067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Mouskeftara T, Deda O, Papadopoulos G, Chatzigeorgiou A, Gika H. Lipidomic Analysis of Liver and Adipose Tissue in a High-Fat Diet-Induced Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Mice Model Reveals Alterations in Lipid Metabolism by Weight Loss and Aerobic Exercise. Molecules. 2024;29(7):1494. doi: 10.3390/molecules29071494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Li Z, Vance DE. Phosphatidylcholine and choline homeostasis. J Lipid Res. 2008;49(6):1187–94. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R700019-JLR200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Monjes NM, Wagner PM, Guido ME. “Disruption of the molecular clock severely affects lipid metabolism in a hepatocellular carcinoma cell model”. J Biol Chem. 2022;298(11):102551. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Rodwell V. Harper’s illustrated biochemistry. n.d.
  • 105.Pradas I, Jové M, Huynh K, Puig J, Ingles M, Borras C, et al. Exceptional human longevity is associated with a specific plasma phenotype of ether lipids. Redox Biol. 2019;21:101127. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Dean JM, Lodhi IJ. Structural and functional roles of ether lipids. Protein Cell. 2018;9(2):196–206. doi: 10.1007/s13238-017-0423-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Tufarelli V, Colonna MA, Losacco C, Puvača N. Biological Health Markers Associated with Oxidative Stress in Dairy Cows during Lactation Period. Metabolites. 2023;13(3):405. doi: 10.3390/metabo13030405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Safa S, Kargar S, Moghaddam GA, Ciliberti MG, Caroprese M. Heat stress abatement during the postpartum period: effects on whole lactation milk yield, indicators of metabolic status, inflammatory cytokines, and biomarkers of the oxidative stress. J Anim Sci. 2019;97(1):122–32. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Rödel HG, Jardim V, Rangassamy M, Jaravel L, Jacquet D, Monclús R, et al. Early life parameters and personality affect oxidative status during adulthood in an altricial rodent. Physiol Rep. 2022;10(19):e15427. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Henrik Oster

26 Nov 2024

PONE-D-24-38949The impact of circadian disruption and high-fat diet on ICR mice reproductive competence, fecal corticosterone and lipid profiles in mid-lactation: implications for maternal-neonate healthPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Casey,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 10 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Henrik Oster, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear authors,

your manuscriüt has been seen by two reviewers and while both acknowledge the relevance of the topic, they both also raise serious concerns regarding the conceptualization of the paper and the presentation of the data. I agree with their views. In a potential revision, please specifically address all issues regarding circadian disruption and oxidative state measures. Also consider revising the abstract and introduction, and carefully check logic and flow in the presentation of the results.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dear authors,

I have carefully reviewed the manuscript entitled "The impact of circadian disruption and high-fat diet on ICR mice reproductive competence, fecal corticosterone and lipid profiles in mid-lactation: implications for maternal-neonate health." The study addresses an interesting and important question—whether a high-fat diet (HFD) affects offspring development and milk production quality. However, several critical issues need to be addressed before the manuscript can be considered for publication in PLOS ONE.

While the topic is of significant interest, the complexity of the experimental design presents challenges in terms of presenting the findings clearly and comprehensively. A well-structured and concise presentation of the results and discussion sections is essential to effectively highlight the key findings. Unfortunately, the manuscript in its current form falls short of these expectations.

Major issues to address:

Abstract: The abstract is too long and reads more like a detailed list of experimental procedures and results, rather than a concise summary of the study's key objectives, findings, and conclusions. It should be revised to offer a clearer snapshot of the study’s main points. Additionally, the title is unnecessarily lengthy and should be shortened to better reflect the focus of the manuscript.

Introduction: The introduction places significant emphasis on circadian clock disruption, yet this aspect is not directly investigated in the study. For example, there are no measurements of clock gene expression or locomotor activity, which would provide evidence of circadian disruption. While the researchers induced internal clock disruption through chronic jetlag during gestation and lactation, this is not introduced or explained in the results section. If circadian disruption is not a core focus of the experimental work, I recommend revising the introduction to better align with the data presented in the manuscript.

Hypothesis on oxidative stress: The hypothesis regarding increased oxidative stress in chronically phase-shifted mice is not directly addressed in the experiments. If oxidative stress cannot be measured, the authors may need to reframe the hypothesis to more accurately reflect the collected data.

Experimental procedures: The experimental procedures, particularly the milking of the dams, require further clarification. While a sketch of the experimental setup was provided, the figures are blurry and difficult to interpret. Additionally, the text lacks clarity regarding how lactating females were selected for milking, when they were euthanised for blood collection, and how the timing of these procedures was managed. Further explanation is also needed for how the separate group of mice, milked regularly during the light phase, was handled. Clear and detailed descriptions of these procedures are crucial for the reader to understand the study design.

Pup handling and milk collection: The manuscript does not specify what happened to the pups after the dams were culled post-milking, nor does it indicate how much milk was collected from each female. If the dams were returned to their cages after milking, this could potentially reduce the amount of milk available to the pups, affecting their development. These details are important and should be addressed.

Results and discussion: Both the results and discussion sections require significant revision. The results are presented in isolated subchapters, lacking context for why specific experiments were conducted. This results in a disjointed presentation, making it difficult for the reader to follow the study’s overall narrative or draw coherent conclusions. A more integrated and cohesive structure is necessary. Furthermore, as previously mentioned, all the figures are blurry and difficult to interpret. Additionally, the discussion section needs to be significantly condensed.

Phrasing and terminology: Some phrasing in the manuscript is imprecise and requires revision for clarity. For example:

Instead of stating that "mice were treated with PS light" or "light treatment," it would be more accurate to describe the light manipulation as a "chronic jetlag protocol," where the mice were phase-shifted by 6 hours every 3 days during gestation and lactation.

Similarly, instead of stating "HF reduces food intake," it should be clarified that the diet "may lead to reduced food intake," as diets do not directly reduce food consumption but may influence it.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript is scientifically sound and of high interest. I believe the use of the PS treatment is a very interesting approach to circadian disruption. I have provided some comments in the manuscript and attach them to the review. I want to emphasize the importance of defining the terms day and night, since are not terms that adapt well to the PS treatment because it does not adapt to the natural 24-hour light/dark cycle.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Aridany Suarez-Trujillo

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-24-38949_reviewer-2.pdf

pone.0320538.s005.pdf (1.1MB, pdf)
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 31;20(3):e0320538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320538.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 1


18 Jan 2025

Response to Manuscript Reviewers: The impact of circadian disruption and high-fat diet on ICR mice reproductive competence, fecal corticosterone and lipid profiles in mid-lactation: implications for maternal-neonate health

We would like to thank you for the suggestions made, and the answers are listed below. In addition, the manuscript has been redrafted to make it clarifying, taking into account the suggestions made by the reviewers.

Reviewer #1:

1) I would just say "circadian disruption"

Response: The text was edited accordingly.

2) High-fat

Response: The text was edited accordingly.

3) Material and Methods: You used 20 and 20 in each group, but in the following sentence, you comment that the HF group had more animals to count with lower conception rates due to treatment.

Response: Apologies for oversight, yes this study assigned the same number of animals to each diet group.

4) Material and Methods: Could you add the conception rate for each group? I am assuming that you had 20 and 20 in CON and HD and 17 conceived in CON and 15 conceived in HF. Is that right?

Response: Yes, we have edited to correct, and give the pregnancy rates.

5) Material and Methods: I believe you should make this figure a Fig1A that is the colored boxes that explain the application of the treatments and Fig1B that contains the timeline. In addition, I think you should further develop the narrative in the figure caption.

Response: We have amended the figure, now A and B, with changes to the caption.

6) Material and Methods: This is not needed. The international agreement for time formatting is the 24-hour format, so you do not need to explain time formating.

Response: Thank you for your observation regarding the explanation of time formatting. We understand that the 24-hour format is internationally recognized. However, as this detail raised doubts for some of the co-authors during manuscript preparation, we chose to include the explanation to ensure clarity and avoid potential misunderstandings for all readers.

7) Material and methods: Did you weigh the dams after the cardiac puncture? how did you address the differences in weight due to variable amounts of blood collected in each animal. Please provide justification why the dams were weighed after blood collection.

Response: Thank you for bringing up this important point. We acknowledge that weighing the dams after blood collection introduces variability in the recorded weights due to the approximately 1 mL of blood collected during the cardiac puncture. This is a recognized limitation of our study. In future studies, we aim to address this limitation by standardizing the timing of weight measurements to occur prior to blood collection, ensuring more accurate and consistent data.

We added the information: “A limitation of this study is that the dams were weighed after the cardiac puncture, following the collection of approximately 1 mL of blood. This may have introduced variability in the recorded weights, as the blood volume collected could contribute to minor differences in the measurements. While the impact of this variability is likely small, it should be considered when interpreting the data. Future studies should address this limitation by standardizing the timing of weight measurements to occur prior to blood collection, ensuring more accurate and consistent data.”

8) Material and Methods: please explain how long were they allowed to suckle.

Response: Thank you for your question. We did not time the suckling events but instead observed until the completion of suckling. We added to a manuscript: “Suckling duration was not timed but was observed until completion to ensure that all pups had adequate access to nursing.”

9) Material and Methods: How were the milk samples preserved prior to the analyses?

Response: Milk samples were preserved at -80°C prior to analyses. We added to the manuscript: “Milk samples were stored at -80°C until analysis.”

10) Material and Methods: Please explain why did you measure TG and not total fat. I am aware that to measure total fat, the most common method is the crematocrit, which uses a large amount of sample compared with how much can be milked from a dam. However, the amount the milk fat is not entirely made up by TG. There is a small portion of other lipids.

Response: Thank you for your question. We measured TG because they account for approximately 98% of milk fat, providing a reliable representation of total fat content. We added to the manuscript: “TG, which comprise approximately 98% of milk fat, were measured as a representation of total fat content.”

11) Material and Methods: I does not matter where the homogenizer is located. I recommend removing it.

Response: The authors removed it.

12) Material and Methods: Explain what you mean by the variable stage. I am assuming that it is pregnancy vs lactation.

Response: Thank you for your comment. By "variable stage," we refer to the stages of pregnancy and lactation. The authors corrected the sentence: “When the time factor was not present, the statistical model included treatments (diet and light), stage (pregnancy and lactation), period of the day (day or night) as fixed effects, and mice as random effects.”

13) Results: Feed intake is measured in grams. What you are trying to refer here by saying "measured in kilocalories" is generally called Energy intake. I recommend you to switch to those two terms, feed intake when you refer at the amount of weight consumed and energy intake to the amount of energy consumed. Please, change throughout the manuscript, tables and figures.

Response: The authors verified the information and the terms were replaced throughout the manuscript, tables and figures.

14) Results: I think this sentence could be improved by switching the order. It is hard to follow since it has the "after 4 weeks of diet feeding pre-pregnancy"

Response: Thank you for the suggestion. We revised the sentence for clarity by reordering the phrasing: “Post hoc analysis indicated that after 4 weeks of pre-pregnancy diet feeding, mice fed a HF diet gained more weight than those on a CON diet.”

15) Results: Do you think "4 weeks of diet exposure during the pre-pregnancy period"

Response: We believe this was an incomplete thought, and the reviewer may be questioning whether 4 weeks of diet exposure was sufficient. While 4 weeks is a short period, we acknowledge that excessive obesity can reduce fertility, and the weight changes observed in this timeframe were sufficient to assess its potential impact on reproductive outcomes.

16) Results: Since the PS group had a constant shift of the lights, what do you mean by day? do you mean the interval 0600 to 1800? I recommend throughout the manuscript either explain that the time period 0600-1800 will be referred as "day" and the time period 1800-0600 will be referred as night, independently of the treatment and the actual light pattern happening for PS group.

Response: Thank you for the suggestion. We will clarify that "day" refers to the time period from 0600 to 1800 and "night" from 1800 to 0600, regardless of the light pattern in the PS group. We added to the manuscript: “In this study, "day" refers to the period from 0600 to 1800, and "night" refers to 1800 to 0600, regardless of the light pattern in the PS group.”

17) I would refer as litter weight. The term growth refers to the changes in weight by time, for example average daily gains used in livestock research.

Response: Thank you for the suggestion. We agree and changed to use "litter weight" instead of "growth" to more accurately reflect the measurement.

18) What does the color/gray shades on the differentially expressed lipids mean? I recommend to add an explanation on what the percentage mean. I understand they refer to the % of differentially expressed or not of the total.

Response: Thank you for the suggestion. The color/gray shades represent the highest to the lowest percentage of differentially expressed lipids, indicating their proportion relative to the total lipids analyzed. We added an explanation for clarity: “Linear model analysis of the overall effect of diet showed that diet significantly altered 67.1% of lipids in milk, 58.1% in mammary gland, 27.2% in liver, and 10.9% in plasma (P-adj < 0.05). The color/gray shades represent the highest to the lowest percentage of differentially expressed lipids, indicating their proportion relative to the total lipids analyzed.”

19) I am sorry for this comment because it is going to make this table even larger. I believe that the table has to stand by itself and be self-explanatory. I would add a legend with:

- how the % were calculated.

- What do the bold font on certain percentages mean?

- Full names for the lipid categories.

- What does HF>CON and others mean.

Response: Thank you for the helpful comments. We added a legend to the table to ensure it is more self-explanatory while keeping it concise: “% Calculation: The percentage of lipids in each class was calculated by multiplying the number of lipids identified in each class by 100, then dividing by the total number of lipids detected. Bold percentages highlight the most affected lipid classes in each matrix. Full names of lipid categories include triacylglycerols (TG), ceramides (Cer), cholesteryl ester (CE), sphingomyelins (SM), diacylglycerols (DG), phosphatidylcholines (PC), phosphatidylethanolamines (PE), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylserines (PS), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), acyl-carnitines (AC), and free fatty acids (FFA). "HF>CON" indicates that lipids are increased in the HF group compared to the CON group. "CON>HF" indicates that lipids are increased in the CON group compared to the HF group.”

20) Results: Were these lipids over-expressed of under-expressed in PS versus LD?

Response: Thank you for the question. The lipids in the PS group were downregulated in the HF-PS group and upregulated in the CON-PS group, particularly in the PC and PE classes. This is reflected in Table 4 and Figure 10. We added as legend for table 4: “Lipids shown in this table were downregulated in the HF-PS group and upregulated in the CON-PS group, with a focus on the PC and PE classes. These trends were identified using the Venny 2.1 tool and are also depicted in Figure 10.”

21) Discussion: Mouse has a very marked nocturnal activity, do you think that the reason why the PS group had greater feed intake during 0600-1800 period than the LD group is simply because a larger percentage of the 0600-1800 periods matched with a dark phase in the holding facility, then the mice tended to consume more feed. What I am trying to grasp is if the mice consumed more because a direct effect of the PS trt on the mice physiology or because whatever the time in the day, the mice will always consume more feed in the dark phase.

Response: That's a potential explanation; however, mice need to eat when they are hungry. The increased feed intake during the 0600-1800 period in the PS group could reflect a direct physiological response to the phase-shifted lighting, rather than just a shift in the dark phase coinciding with the feed intake.

22) Discussion: This is what I was afraid when you measured TG in milk and not total fat. Cheng's article with HF vs CON diets, milk fat was measured with the crematocrit method instead of measuring TG. That can be the reason why you do not see differences in TG between treatments. Do you have any previous work that proves the correlation between milk TG and total fat %. I would recommend you to add it as a caveat or pitfall of the method used.

Response: Thank you for the suggestion. We acknowledge that TG represents only a component of total milk fat, accounting for 98%. We have added this as a weakness in the manuscript, noting that while TG is a reliable measure, it may not capture the full fat profile, which could explain the lack of differences between treatments.

23) Discussion: There's something wrong in the grammar of this sentence: "Elongation of FA (C16) to very-long-chain FA (C18 or longer) occurs via elongation of very long chain fatty acids (ELOVL)-mediated chain elongation [76,77].""

Response: Thank you for pointing that out. We corrected the grammar in the sentence: “The elongation of C16 fatty acids to very long-chain fatty acids (C18 or longer) occurs through ELOVL-mediated chain elongation [76,77].”

24) Discussion: Any cellular membrane?

Response: Thank you for pointing that out. We have clarified this in the manuscript with the following sentence: "While PC is primarily associated with maintaining the integrity and functionality of the plasma membrane, PE plays a critical role within cytoplasmic lipid droplets and contributes to various metabolic processes."

25) Discussion: I think the term night and day should be defined in here, the figure caption and the manuscript. What does night/day mean? is it based on the 0600-1800 and 1800-0600 periods or the dark or light phase that was happening in the LD or PS rooms at the time the births were observed. Same for feed/energy intake

Response: The information was added.

26) Figure 6: If this is a percentage, I so not think you should have 120%.

Response: The figure was corrected.

27) Figure 7: Is it there a light trt, diet or light trt*diet effect that is worth adding as p-values on one side of the figure. I would make these thicker, so it is easier to see.

Response: The information was added, and the changes were made to the figure.

Reviewer #2:

28) Abstract: The abstract is too long and reads more like a detailed list of experimental procedures and results, rather than a concise summary of the study's key objectives, findings, and conclusions. It should be revised to offer a clearer snapshot of the study’s main points. Additionally, the title is unnecessarily lengthy and should be shortened to better reflect the focus of the manuscript.

Response: The abstract was extensively edited, and titled changed.

29) The introduction places significant emphasis on circadian clock disruption, yet this aspect is not directly investigated in the study. For example, there are no measurements of clock gene expression or locomotor activity, which would provide evidence of circadian disruption. While the researchers induced internal clock disruption through chronic jetlag during gestation and lactation, this is not introduced or explained in the results section. If circadian disruption is not a core focus of the experimental work, I recommend revising the introduction to better align with the data presented in the manuscript.

Response: Thank you for your valuable comment. We acknowledge that the lack of direct measurements of circadian behavior, such as clock gene expression or locomotor activity, is a limitation of our study. However, the chronic jet lag model used in this study is a well-established method for inducing circadian disruption, and prior research supports its effectiveness in altering circadian rhythms, from the molecular to the behavioral level. We have added references to support use of this model for studying impacts of circadian disruption and added lack of measures on behavior and ‘rhythms’ themselves (although fecal output and feed intake may give some insight) as a limitation to the study in the discussion section.

That acknowledged and manuscript amended accordingly, measuring the impact of circadian disrupting environment on study outcomes was a major thrust of this work. In this 2X2 factor study, we report PS significantly impacted birthing time of day, lactose content of milk, corticosterone levels in feces, and levels of fecal corticosterone across the physiological-reproductive states. The fact it had minimal effects on lipidomes, surprised us, as we hypothesized it would, based on work of others, which demonstrated a central role of clocks in lipid metabolism in both liver and mammary, with plasma and milk lipid content regulated by these respective organs.

30) Hypothesis on oxidative stress: The hypothesis regarding increased oxidative stress in chronically phase-shifted mice is not directly addressed in the experiments. If oxidative stress cannot be measured, the authors may need to reframe the hypothesis to more accurately reflect the collected data."

Response: Thank you for your comment. You a

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_01_08_2025.docx

pone.0320538.s006.docx (29.3KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Henrik Oster

6 Feb 2025

PONE-D-24-38949R1Exposure to circadian disrupting environment and high-fat diet during pregnancy and lactation alter reproductive competence and lipid profiles of liver, mammary, plasma and milk of ICR micePLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Casey,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================- revise the abstract- avoid long sentences- revise results section with regard to readability and considering usability for a general audience==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 23 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Henrik Oster, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear authors,

while both reviewers acknowledge the effort you made in improving the manuscript, still concerns were raised regarding the presentation of data in the text. Please carefully address the comments of reviewer 1 regarding the abstract and the presentation of results, keeping in ind the general audience of this journal.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors conducted a substantial revision on their manuscript, however, the complexity of the project makes it still difficult to extract the main outcome of the project.

The abstract contains more methodological and result details than typically recommended for PLOS ONE. According to the journal's guidelines, it should provide a concise summary of the research objectives, methods, key findings, and conclusions. The study’s complex experimental procedures make conciseness challenging, the abstract currently includes excessive detail on diet types, pup survival and growth metrics, and various physiological measures (e.g., fecal corticosterone levels, milk composition, and lipid profiles). This reduces clarity and readability. Additionally, it exceeds the 300-word limit and includes statistical p-values, which should be omitted. Refining the abstract to focus on the study’s core findings while adhering to journal guidelines would improve its clarity and impact.

Results:

Lines 257–260 do not clearly indicate whether the peak kcal intake is from the PS group or the HFD group. The text should explicitly specify this, as it seems to refer to the PS group, but clarification is needed.

Although the authors have attempted to improve the structure in the results section, the text remains difficult to follow as the main thread is still unclear. The authors present interesting data, but they combine different life stages, such as pregnancy and lactation, along with various treatments, including chronic jetlag, HFD, and LD cycles, all at once. This makes the section challenging to read and follow.

I still believe that restructuring the results section would enhance clarity, particularly given the complexity of the experimental procedures. I suggest that the authors take a systematic approach, starting with food intake data during pregnancy (e.g., early vs. late stages) and comparing these between the PS and HF diets to determine whether these conditions affect energy intake. They could then proceed with food intake data specifically during lactation, highlighting that PS significantly impacts food intake, particularly in late lactation, whereas the HF diet did not result in increased food intake.

Also the text of glucocorticoid subchapter is difficult to follow because it contains long, complex sentences that present multiple ideas at once, making it hard to track the main case. The logical connections between different variables, such as physiological stage, light exposure, and diet, are not always clearly established, which can make it confusing to understand why specific comparisons are being made. The text also does not explicitly justify why certain conditions are being compared, which could leave the reader wondering about the reasoning behind the study design. A clearer structure with more concise sentences, explicit explanations of the rationale for comparisons, and a stronger emphasis on the main takeaways would significantly improve readability.

Minor changes:

Introduction:

74 change if oxidative change to of oxidative change

171 Feces" is a plural noun: feces were collected

Discussion:

Please include the study of Astiz et al. (doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17429-5) in your discussion. This study demonstrates that maternal glucocorticoids influence offspring behavioral outcomes, which would be valuable to consider in the context of your findings on diet and chronic jetlag.

Reviewer #2: Thank you for addressing all the comments. I have reviewed your responses to the comments and the modifications in the manuscript and I believe the manuscript is now ready for publication.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Mar 31;20(3):e0320538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320538.r005

Author response to Decision Letter 2


17 Feb 2025

Response to review-2 PONE

We would like to thank reviewer 1 for their additional comments, and concerted efforts to improve the readability and clarity of our manuscript. We believe the changes made in the second revision have done so.

Reviewer #1: The authors conducted a substantial revision on their manuscript, however, the complexity of the project makes it still difficult to extract the main outcome of the project.

The abstract contains more methodological and result details than typically recommended for PLOS ONE. According to the journal's guidelines, it should provide a concise summary of the research objectives, methods, key findings, and conclusions. The study’s complex experimental procedures make conciseness challenging, the abstract currently includes excessive detail on diet types, pup survival and growth metrics, and various physiological measures (e.g., fecal corticosterone levels, milk composition, and lipid profiles). This reduces clarity and readability. Additionally, it exceeds the 300-word limit and includes statistical p-values, which should be omitted. Refining the abstract to focus on the study’s core findings while adhering to journal guidelines would improve its clarity and impact.

RE: abstract was shortened to 296 words, and better focused

Results:

Lines 257–260 do not clearly indicate whether the peak kcal intake is from the PS group or the HFD group. The text should explicitly specify this, as it seems to refer to the PS group, but clarification is needed.

RE: We thank you for encouraging us to address the readability-understandability of these data—and believe the changes made to this section do this. The same goes for comment below.

Although the authors have attempted to improve the structure in the results section, the text remains difficult to follow as the main thread is still unclear. The authors present interesting data, but they combine different life stages, such as pregnancy and lactation, along with various treatments, including chronic jetlag, HFD, and LD cycles, all at once. This makes the section challenging to read and follow.

RE: see above, we believe changes made to this section help better clarify outcomes.

I still believe that restructuring the results section would enhance clarity, particularly given the complexity of the experimental procedures. I suggest that the authors take a systematic approach, starting with food intake data during pregnancy (e.g., early vs. late stages) and comparing these between the PS and HF diets to determine whether these conditions affect energy intake. They could then proceed with food intake data specifically during lactation, highlighting that PS significantly impacts food intake, particularly in late lactation, whereas the HF diet did not result in increased food intake.

RE: as above

Also the text of glucocorticoid subchapter is difficult to follow because it contains long, complex sentences that present multiple ideas at once, making it hard to track the main case. The logical connections between different variables, such as physiological stage, light exposure, and diet, are not always clearly established, which can make it confusing to understand why specific comparisons are being made. The text also does not explicitly justify why certain conditions are being compared, which could leave the reader wondering about the reasoning behind the study design. A clearer structure with more concise sentences, explicit explanations of the rationale for comparisons, and a stronger emphasis on the main takeaways would significantly improve readability.

RE: Changes were made to this section to help clarify and highlight important outcomes.

Minor changes:

Introduction:

74 change if oxidative change to of oxidative change

RE: edited

171 Feces" is a plural noun: feces were collected

RE: edited

Discussion:

Please include the study of Astiz et al. (doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17429-5) in your discussion. This study demonstrates that maternal glucocorticoids influence offspring behavioral outcomes, which would be valuable to consider in the context of your findings on diet and chronic jetlag.

RE: added reference and relevant findings to discussion

Decision Letter 2

Henrik Oster

21 Feb 2025

Exposure to circadian disrupting environment and high-fat diet during pregnancy and lactation alter reproductive competence and lipid profiles of liver, mammary, plasma and milk of ICR mice

PONE-D-24-38949R2

Dear Dr. Casey,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Henrik Oster, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Congrats on this nice story.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Henrik Oster

PONE-D-24-38949R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Casey,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Henrik Oster

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Attachment

Submitted filename: pone.0320538.docx

pone.0320538.s007.docx (3.5MB, docx)

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. MRMs profiled in the screening phase.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0320538.s001.xlsx (134.1KB, xlsx)
    S2 File. Supplementary tables.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0320538.s002.docx (28KB, docx)
    S3 File. Description of significant lipids changes in each matrix under LD and PS within HF and CON diets.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0320538.s003.xlsx (27.4KB, xlsx)
    S4 File. Lipids modified by chronic jet lag exposure within the CON diet group.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0320538.s004.docx (30KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-24-38949_reviewer-2.pdf

    pone.0320538.s005.pdf (1.1MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_01_08_2025.docx

    pone.0320538.s006.docx (29.3KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: pone.0320538.docx

    pone.0320538.s007.docx (3.5MB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES