Skip to main content
. 2005 Aug;187(15):5203–5213. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.15.5203-5213.2005

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Representative examples of GASP competition phenotypes which appeared during the cocultivation of aged and nonaged subpopulations of P. putida. For simplification, the competing subpopulations are marked as population 1 and population 2. Different expression levels of the GASP phenotype are shown for population 1, which consists of cells derived from a 1-day-old (nonaged) culture, and for population 2, derived from an 8-day-old (aged) culture. Population 2 was able to out-compete population 1 either completely (strong GASP phenotype, panel A) or partially (mild GASP phenotype, panel B) or displayed an equal fitness to that of population 1 (equal GASP phenotype, panel C). In some cases, population 2 was either partially or completely out-competed by population 1 (no GASP phenotype, panel D).