Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2025 Apr 1;317(1):668. doi: 10.1007/s00403-025-04176-0

Prevalence of sleep disorders in atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ningxin Zhang 1,#, Huiyan Chi 1,#, Qiubai Jin 2, Meiqi Sun 3, Yuechun Zhao 2, Ping Song 1,
PMCID: PMC11961468  PMID: 40169442

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the prevalence of sleep disorders among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and to explore the association between AD and sleep disorders. This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Systematic Review Registry (PROSPERO) database (registration number: CRD42024498045). Only English-written cross-sectional studies reporting the prevalence of sleep disorders in patients with AD were included in this analysis. We searched four databases: EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed and the Cochrane Library as of 9 February 2025. Studies were screened using EndNote X9.1. Data were analyzed using STATA V15.0 software. Initially, a total of 861 studies were searched from databases. Ultimately, 32 studies including 85,921 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The prevalence of sleep disorders among individuals with AD was estimated using a random-effects model. The degree of heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistic. If significant heterogeneity was detected, the source of heterogeneity was determined by meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were then conducted by sequentially excluding each study to assess the robustness of the findings. This analysis revealed that the combined prevalence of sleep disorders among patients with AD was 43.4% (95% confidence interval: 39.7%-47.1%). Subgroup analyses were conducted according to region, data source, year of publication, severity of AD, sleep disorder assessment scales, classification of sleep problems, nocturnal awakenings, and number of days of sleep disorders experienced per week.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00403-025-04176-0.

Keywords: Atopic dermatitis, Meta-analysis, Sleep disturbances, Prevalence, Pruritus

Introduction

Atopic Dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent inflammatory skin condition characterized by recurrent eczematous lesions and intense pruritus. AD is characterized by a significant genetic predisposition. The typical pathophysiological mechanisms involve dysfunction of the skin barrier and dysbiosis of the microbiota, as well as immune dysregulation and neuroimmune interactions. AD affects individuals across all age groups and ethnicities, exerting substantial psychosocial impacts on patients and their relatives. Furthermore, AD can lead to complications, including food allergies, asthma, allergic rhinitis, psychological health issues, and sleep disturbances [1, 2].

Sleep disturbances are common among the general population [3, 4]. Sleep disturbances encompass insomnia, sleep deprivation due to no sleep opportunities, and daytime somnolence, which are particularly prevalent among younger individuals [5, 6]. The prevalence of sleep disturbances varies across different countries. Research indicates that approximately one-third of the global population is afflicted by sleep disturbances [7]. Sleep disturbances can increase the risk of developing depression, inflammatory diseases, and infectious illnesses [8]. The exact mechanisms linking AD and sleep disturbances are not yet fully understood. However, recent studies have unveiled several potential mechanisms. For instance, pruritus caused by inflammatory mediators or allergens serves as the primary contributor to sleep disturbances in patients with AD. As the frequency of scratching increases, a behavioral cognitive cycle of insomnia combined with scratching is formed, which further exacerbates sleep disturbances. Additionally, tissue damage and the release of inflammatory mediators induced by scratching are also associated with sleep disturbances. Moreover, the disruption of the skin barrier function may lead to sleep disturbances by altering circadian rhythms and increasing sensitivity to environmental triggers. Emerging evidence also suggests that psychological problems such as stress and anxiety are prevalent in AD patients and have been proven to have a negative impact on their sleep quality [914]. However, numerous studies have reported that the prevalence of sleep disturbances in children with AD ranges from 47 to 80%, while in adults with AD, it varies from 33 to 90% [1518].

Thus, there is no consensus on the global prevalence of sleep disturbances in patients with AD. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to ascertain the prevalence of sleep disturbances among individuals with AD and to explore the relationship between AD and sleep disturbances.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines [19]. The study protocol has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (registration number: CRD42024498045). Prior to the registration of our protocol, a thorough search of both PROSPERO and AD sleep disturbance was conducted to verify the existence of similar systematic reviews to avoid duplications.

Search strategy

Up until February 2025, we searched four databases (EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library), so as to mitigate the risk of selection bias. Additional relevant studies were also searched by contacting corresponding authors.

The search strategy was designed by combining the following terms:

  1. Terms related to AD (“atopic dermatitis”, “Dermatitis, Atopic”, “Atopic Dermatiti*”, “Atopic Neurodermatiti*”, “Disseminated Neurodermatiti*”, “Atopic Eczema”, “Infantile Eczema”, “coca sulzberger disease”, “coca sulzberger syndrome”, “eczema endogenous”, and “neurodermatitis constitutionalis”);

  2. Terms associated with relevant sleep disturbance (“Dyssomnia*”, “Sleep Disorder*”, “Nocturnal Eating Drinking Syndrome*”, and “inadequate sleep”);

  3. Related Terms (“Prevalence*”);

  4. Only cross-sectional study designs (“prevalence studies”, “cross-sectional studies”, and “survey”).

The search strategy can be briefly summarized as “atopic dermatitis” AND “dyssomnias” AND “Prevalence.” Detailed search strategies for each database are provided in File S1.

Eligibility criteria

The inclusion and exclusion criteria were established according to the PICOS principle as follows:

  • Population: Studies involving participants diagnosed with AD.

  • Exposure: Studies assessing or reporting sleep disturbances in AD patients.

  • Outcomes: Studies providing quantitative data on the prevalence of sleep disturbances and the sample size.

  • Study design: Cross-sectional studies published in English.

  • No restrictions are placed on the characteristics of the participants. Abstracts, case reports, editorials, infographics, letters, narrative reviews, commentaries, opinions, position statements, and systematic reviews were excluded. File S2 detailing the exclusion of duplicates as well as the 97 studies that were screened for title and abstract but were not ultimately included and the reasons for exclusion (e.g., RCTs, incomplete data, non-English articles, etc.).

Data abstraction and quality appraisal

The prevalence was defined as the number of patients with sleep disturbances among patients with AD divided by the total number of patients with AD. Two researchers (Ningxin Zhang and Ping Song) extracted data from each study using a standardized data extraction form. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion. The collected data included author, publication time, country, total study sample size, sample size of sleep disturbances, prevalence rates, AD severity levels, follow-up durations, study types, sources of data, scales of sleep disorder assessment, classifications of sleep issues, frequency of nocturnal awakenings, and the number of days with sleep disturbances per week. Discrepancies in data or disagreements between two reviewers were addressed through discussion. In cases where a consensus was unattainable, a third reviewer was consulted to make the final decision.

The quality of the included studies was independently assessed by two researchers (Huiyan Chi and Qiubai Jin) using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Quality Checklist [20]. The JBI instrument is a recognized and effective quality tool used to evaluate the overall quality of studies on prevalence from various aspects such as sampling methods, study subjects, data collection, and analysis methods. It is designed to assess the credibility, relevance, and results of studies on prevalence. The checklist consists of nine items, each scored from 1 to 4. A score of 1 denotes “yes,” 2 indicates “no,” 3 represents “unclear,” and 4 stands for “not mentioned.” The total score ranges from 9 to 36. A lower score indicates a higher quality of a study.

Data analysis

STATA V15.0 software was used for data analysis. The prevalence of sleep disturbances in AD patients was estimated using the random-effects DerSimonian-Laird method. All results were presented with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity tests (I2 statistic) were conducted to measure the degree of heterogeneity in the reported prevalence rates of sleep disturbances that could be attributed to differences between the studies, rather than by chance alone. To determine the potential sources of heterogeneity among different studies, meta-regression was performed to evaluate the impact of several covariates on the overall heterogeneity, such as region, source of data, publication year, and classifications of sleep issues. Further subgroup analyses were performed. To assess the robustness of our results, a sensitivity analysis was conducted by separately excluding each study. Traditional methods such as funnel plots and asymmetry tests have been shown to be unsuitable for assessing publication bias in studies on prevalence [21], and thus, we did not assess publication bias in this study. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all analyses.

Results

Study screening and selection

A total of 861 studies were initially identified from databases. Of these, 289 duplicate studies were excluded, leaving 562 records. Following the review of titles and abstracts, 306 studies were eliminated as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Upon full-text review, a further 72 irrelevant studies, 10 randomized controlled trials, six studies with insufficient data, and nine non-English language studies were excluded. Ultimately, 32 studies [2253] were included in our analysis, encompassing a total of 85,921 participants. Figure 1 illustrates the study selection process.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Prisma literature screening process

The present meta-analysis included 32 studies with 85,921 individuals. These studies were conducted in 20 countries, including South Korea (k = 4), Iraq (k = 1), Italy (k = 4), Iran (k = 1), Japan (k = 2), Malaysia (k = 1), Australia (k = 1), the United States (k = 9), Kuwait (k = 1), France (k = 3), Germany (k = 3), Spain (k = 2), the United Kingdom (k = 4), the Netherlands (k = 1), Denmark (k = 1), Greece (k = 1), Indonesia (k = 1), Turkey (k = 1), Egypt (k = 1) and Brazil (k = 1). The sample sizes across these studies ranged from 30 to 42,641 individuals. All 32 studies adopted a cross-sectional design. In addition, all studies employed subjective sleep assessment scales to quantify the quality of sleep in participants. Further information regarding these studies is encapsulated in Table 1. The quality assessment showed that one study scored 9, six studies scored 10, five studies scored 11, six studies scored 12, eleven studies scored 13, one study scored 14, and two studies scored 15. The quality evaluation results of the included studies are provided in Table 2.

Table 1.

Relevant information on the included studies

Author Year Country AD Sleep Disorder Prevalence AD severity Follow-up time Study type
Hye-Jin Ahn 2019 Korea 42,641 938 2.20% NA 156 months Cross-sectional study
Ahang Mohammed Hamid 2020 Iraqi 100 73 73.00% Mild, Moderate, Severe 12 months Cross-sectional study
N. L. Bragazzi 2021 Italy 30 21 70.00% Mild, Moderate, Severe 13 months Cross-sectional study
Najmolsadat Atef 2019 Iran 95 31 32.63% NA 12 months Cross-sectional study
Kazuhiko ARIMA 2018 Japan 634 82 12.93% Mild, Moderate, Severe 12 months Cross-sectional study
Asmaa’ Hazirah Abdullah 2023 Malaysia 64 60 93.75% NA 12 months Cross-sectional study
Danny Camfferman 2010 Australia 77 36 46.75% NA 6 months Cross-sectional study
Sarah L. Chamlin 2005 USA 270 183 67.78% Mild, Moderate, Severe NA Cross-sectional study
Ali H. Ziyab, PhD 2022 Kuwait 724 249 34.39% NA 12 months Cross-sectional study
Vonita Chawla 2016 USA 123 38 30.89% NA 36 months Cross-sectional study
Won Jun Choi 2012 Korea 594 103 17.34% Mild, Moderate, Severe 7 months Cross-sectional study
Laurent Eckert 2017 USA 349 116 33.24% NA 12 months Cross-sectional study
Laurent Eckert 2019 France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Britain 1860 423 22.74% NA 12 months Cross-sectional study
Alexander EGEBERG 2021 France, Italy, Germany, Britain 631 311 49.29% NA 12 months Cross-sectional study
R.M.EMERSON 2000 Britain 290 60 20.69% Mild, Moderate, Severe 12 months Cross-sectional study
Junfen Zhang 2022 Holland 1288 580 45.03% Mild, Severe 96 months Cross-sectional study
Anna B. Fishbein 2021 USA 180 134 74.44% Mild, Moderate, Severe 2 months Cross-sectional study
T. Gerner 2021 Denmark 1234 577 46.76% Mild, Moderate, Severe 60 months Cross-sectional study
Jonathan Ian Silverberg 2021 USA 602 255 42.36% Mild, Moderate, Severe NA Cross-sectional study
Giampiero Girolomoni 2020 France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Britain 1014 625 61.64% Mild/Moderate, Severe/Extremely severe 12 months Cross-sectional study
Stamatis Gregoriou 2022 Greece 67 46 68.66% NA 12 months Cross-sectional study
Stephanie M. Rangel 2022 USA 248 184 74.19% NA Cross-sectional study
Hanifin 2007 USA 6931 67 0.97% NA 12 months Cross-sectional study
Irwanto 2019 Indonesia 35 30 85.71% NA 2 months Cross-sectional study
Bohye Kim 2020 Korea 2393 1177 49.19% NA 17 months Cross-sectional study
Harutaka Yamaguchi 2015 Japan 59 32 54.24% NA 1 month Cross-sectional study
Shawn G. Kwatra 2021 USA 1017 576 56.64% Moderate, Severe 12 months Cross-sectional study
Emine Gulsah Torun 2020 Turkey 80 40 50.00% NA 13 months Cross-sectional study
Mark A. Strom 2016 USA 12,975 1371 10.57% NA 48 months Cross-sectional study
Fadia Sorour 2017 Egypt 110 57 51.82% NA NA Cross-sectional study
Marília Magalhaes Moraes 2024 Brazil 100 23 23.00% Mild, Moderate, Severe 21 months Cross-sectional study
Jae Hyeok Lim 2024 Korea 9106 1869 20.52% NA 36 months Cross-sectional study

Notes: Basic information of included studies encompasses author, year, country, sample size, number of sleep disorders, prevalence of sleep disorders, AD severity, follow-up time, and study type

Table 2.

Quality evaluation results of the included studies

Author I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX Total
Hye-Jin Ahn 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 13
Ahang Mohammed Hamid 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 12
N. L. Bragazzi 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Najmolsadat Atef 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 1 13
Kazuhiko ARIMA 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 13
Asmaa’ Hazirah Abdullah 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Danny Camfferman 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Sarah L. Chamlin 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Ali H. Ziyab, PhD 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 13
Vonita Chawla 1 1 2 1 2 3 3 1 1 15
Won Jun Choi 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 13
Laurent Eckert 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 13
Laurent Eckert 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 13
Alexander EGEBERG 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 11
R.M.EMERSON 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 11
Junfen Zhang 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 12
Anna B. Fishbein 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 10
T. Gerner 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 13
Jonathan Ian Silverberg 1 1 1 3 2 1 3 1 1 14
Giampiero Girolomoni 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 11
Stamatis Gregoriou 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Stephanie M. Rangel 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 11
Hanifin 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 11
Irwanto 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 12
Bohye Kim 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 12
Harutaka Yamaguchi 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 1 1 13
Shawn G. Kwatra 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 15
Emine Gulsah Torun 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Mark A. Strom 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 13
Fadia Sorour 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 12
Marília Magalhaes Moraes 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 12
Jae Hyeok Lim 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 13

Notes: I–IX represent nine items in the JBI

Prevalence of sleep disturbance in AD

Based on all eligible studies, this meta-analysis assessed the prevalence of sleep disturbances in patients with AD. The findings revealed that the prevalence of sleep disturbances among AD patients was 43.4% (95% CI 39.7–47.1%, I2 = 100.00%). The forest plot is shown in Fig. 2. The sensitivity analysis is illustrated in Fig. 3.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Summary forest plot

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Summary sensitivity analysis

Subgroup analysis

There were 32 sets of data for subgroup analysis by regions (11 sets of data in Asia, 9 in Europe, 1 in Oceania, 9 in North America, 1 in Africa and 1 in South America). Among patients with AD in the Asian region, the prevalence of sleep disturbances was found to be 43.5% (95% CI 32.0–55.1%). In Europe, the prevalence of sleep disturbances among AD patients was slightly higher at 47.6% (95% CI 36.3–58.9%). The prevalence of sleep disturbances in AD patients in Oceania was similar, at a rate of 46.8% (95% CI 35.3–58.5%). In the North American region, the prevalence rate was slightly lower at 43.1% (95% CI 34.3–52.0%). The prevalence in Africa was the highest at 51.8% (95% CI 42.1–61.4%). Lastly, in South America, the prevalence was the lowest, at 23.0% (95% CI 15.2–32.5%). The results of subgroup analysis are provided in Table 3. The forest plot is shown in Fig. S1.

Table 3.

Information of subgroups

Subgroup No. of studies No. of sleep disorder Sample size Subgroup analysis Meta-regression
Estimated rate (95% CI) I2 (%) p-value I2 (%) p-value
Study region
Asia 11 4650 56,445 0.435 (0.320, 0.551) 99.83%  < 0.01 100.00% 0.690
Europe 9 2683 6494 0.476 (0.363, 0.589) 98.82%  < 0.01
Oceania 1 36 77 0.468 (0.353, 0.585)
North America 9 2924 22,695 0.431 (0.343, 0.520) 99.82%  < 0.01
Africa 1 57 110 0.518 (0.421, 0.614)
South America 1 23 100 0.230 (0.152, 0.325)
Overall 32 10,373 85,921 0.434 (0.397, 0.471) 99.79%  < 0.01
Study data source
Hospital 16 2485 45,677 0.527 (0.335, 0.718) 99.67%  < 0.01 99.79% 0.066
Non-hospital 16 7888 40,244 0.364 (0.286, 0.441) 99.85%  < 0.01
Overall 32 10,373 85,921 0.434 (0.397, 0.471) 99.79%  < 0.01
Study sleep disorder assessment scale
PSQI 2 52 125 0.419 (0.337, 0.501)
PROMIS 2 318 428 0.743 (0.702, 0.784)
BISQ 2 70 115 0.669 (0.589, 0.748)
Overall 6 440 668 0.645 (0.499, 0.790) 93.92%  < 0.01
Study year
2000–2015 6 487 8221 0.359 (0.164, 0.554) 99.44%  < 0.01 99.99% 0.354
2016–2025 26 9886 77,700 0.463 (0.396, 0.529) 99.82%  < 0.01
Overall 32 10,373 85,291 0.448 (0.410, 0.485) 99.79%  < 0.01
Subgroup No. of studies No. Of sleep disorder Sample size Subgroup analysis
Estimated rate (95% CI) I2 (%) p-value
Study AD severity
Mild 3 106 1414 0.075 (0.062, 0.089) 99.99% 0.846
Moderate 2 311 1414 0.217 (0.196, 0.239)
Severe 2 177 1414 0.103 (0.087, 0.118)
Mild/Moderate 1 12 67 0.179 (0.096, 0.292)
Severe/Extremely severe 1 23 67 0.343 (0.232, 0.469)
Moderate/Severe 1 14 100 0.140 (0.079, 0.224)
Overall 10 710 6606 0.177 (0.127, 0.228) 95.70%  < 0.01
Study sleep problem
Sleep debt 14 4968 20,164 0.517 (0.368, 0.665) 99.70%  < 0.01 99.66% 0.009
Drowsiness 3 56 1400 0.159 (-0.025, 0.343)
Overall 17 5024 21,564 0.454 (0.356, 0.553) 99.71%  < 0.01
Study nocturnal awakening
Sleep–wake transition disorder 1 10 77 0.130 (0.064, 0.226)
Nocturnal awakening 1 249 724 0.344 (0.309, 0.380)
Number of wakings during the night ≥ 3 2 59 115 0.524 (0.437, 0.612)
Nocturnal waking hours ≥ 1 h 2 29 115 0.252 (0.173, 0.332)
Overall 6 347 1031 0.345 (0.225, 0.465) 91.60%  < 0.01
Study number of days per week with sleep disorders
0–3 3 11,884 13,478 0.669 (0.373, 0.964)
4–7 3 1534 13,478 0.250 (0.070, 0.430)
Overall 6 13,418 26,956 0.460 (0.024, 0.896) 99.99%  < 0.01

Notes: The number of included studies, number of patients with sleep disorders, sample size, and estimated I2 and p value of subgroup analysis (95%cl), I2 and p value of meta-regression in 8 subgroups: region, data source, year of publication, AD severity, sleep assessment scales, classification of sleep disorders, nocturnal awakening issues, the number of days with sleep disturbances per week

In the subgroup analysis by source of the data, there were 32 sets of data. Among patients with AD from hospitals, the prevalence of sleep disturbances was notably higher, at 52.7% (95% CI 33.5–71.8%). In contrast, for people with AD whose data were not from hospitals, the prevalence of sleep disturbances was lower, at 36.4% (95% CI 28.6–44.1%). The forest plot for the subgroup analysis by the source of the data is illustrated in Fig. S2.

For subgroup analysis by years of publication, there were 32 sets of data. The prevalence of sleep disorders among patients with AD from 2000 to 2015 was reported to be 35.9% (95% CI 16.4–55.4%). For patients with AD from 2016 to 2025, the reported prevalence was 46.3% (95% CI 39.6–52.9%). The forest plot for subgroup analysis by the years of publication is illustrated in Fig. S3.

In the subgroup analysis by the severity of AD, there were 10 sets of data. The prevalence of sleep disorders among patients with mild AD was 7.5% (95% CI 6.2–8.9%). For those with moderate AD, the prevalence of sleep disorders was 21.7% (95% CI 19.6–23.9%). In patients with severe AD, the prevalence of sleep disorders was 10.3% (95% CI 8.7–11.8%). Among patients with mild to moderate AD, the prevalence of sleep disorders was 17.9% (95% CI 9.6–29.2%). In patients with moderate to severe AD, the prevalence of sleep disorders was higher, at 14.0% (95% CI 7.9–2.4%). For patients with severe to very severe AD, the prevalence of sleep disorders was higher, at 34.3% (95% CI 23.2–46.9%). The forest plot for subgroup analysis by the severity of AD is shown in Fig. S4.

In the subgroup analysis by assessment scales for sleep disorders, six sets of data were used. The prevalence of sleep disorders in AD patients assessed by the PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) scale was 41.9% (95% CI 33.7–50.1%). When the PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) scale was used to evaluate sleep disorders in AD patients, the prevalence was 74.3% (95% CI 70.2–78.4%). Additionally, the prevalence of sleep disorders in AD patients assessed by the BISQ (Brief Insomnia Screening Questionnaire) scale was 66.9% (95% CI 58.9–74.8%). The forest plot for subgroup analysis by assessment scales is provided in Fig. S5.

For subgroup analysis by the classification of sleep disturbances, there were 17 sets of data, including 14 on insomnia and 3 on somnolence. The prevalence of insomnia among patients with AD was 51.7% (95% CI 36.8–66.5%). The prevalence of somnolence among AD patients was 15.9% (95% CI – 2.5 to 34.3%). The forest plot for subgroup analysis by the classification of sleep disturbances is provided in Fig. S6.

The subgroup analysis by nocturnal awakening issues was performed based on 6 sets of data. The prevalence of sleep–wake transition disorders among patients with AD was 13.0% (95% CI 6.4–22.6%). The prevalence of nocturnal awakenings in AD patients was 34.4% (95% CI 30.9–38.0%). The prevalence of awakenings at night three or more times in AD patients was 52.4% (95% CI 43.7–61.2%). The prevalence of AD patients who spent a total of one hour or more awake during the night was 25.2% (95% CI 17.3–33.2%). The forest plot for subgroup analysis by nocturnal awakening issues is provided in Fig. S7.

For subgroup analysis by on the number of days with sleep disturbances per week, 6 sets of data were used. The prevalence rate of sleep disturbances from 0 to 3 days per week in patients with AD was 66.9% (95% CI 37.3–96.4%). The prevalence rate for sleep disturbances on 4 to 7 days per week in AD patients was 25.0% (95% CI 7.0–43.0%). The forest plot for subgroup analysis by the number of days with sleep disturbances per week is depicted in Fig. S8.

Subgroups with more than ten studies were region, source of data, publication year, and sleep disorder classification. Meta-regression was employed to assess the sources of heterogeneity across different studies. For region (p = 0.866), data source (p = 0.067), publication year (p = 0.092), and severity of AD (p = 0.846), no significant heterogeneity was found. However, the classification of sleep disturbance (p = 0.009) might be a source of heterogeneity.

To assess the robustness of the results, a sensitivity analysis was also conducted by sequentially excluding each study. The specific results of the sensitivity analysis are presented in Fig. 3.

Discussion

This is the first meta-analysis to investigate the prevalence of sleep disturbances in patients with AD. The meta-analysis, encompassing 32 datasets, reveals a high prevalence of sleep disturbances among patients with AD, at 43.4% (95% CI 39.7–47.1%). Further subgroup analysis unravels that the highest incidence of sleep disturbances was observed in patients from the African region, those from hospitals, studies published between 2016 to 2025, patients with severe- to very severe AD, patients assessed by PROMIS scales, individuals with a nighttime wake-up frequency of three times or more, and those with sleep disturbances for 0 to 3 days per week.

There are few previous meta-analyses of sleep disorders in AD. A meta-analysis evaluating the sleep quality of AD patients (Miaolan Guo) [54] included seven case–control or cohort studies involving 173 AD patients and 122 controls. Their analysis revealed that the sleep quality was poor in AD patients, particularly those with severe AD, men, and adults. This observation aligns with the findings presented in the current study. Another meta-analysis of the risk of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents with AD (Qian-Wen Xie) [55] showed that children and adolescents with AD were at higher risk of psychiatric disorders, including sleep disorders, which is consistent with the findings of the current study. However, it only included children and adolescents with AD compared to our study, and did not cover a wider range of people of different ages.

The relationship between AD and sleep disorders may be attributed to three potential mechanisms [9], including itching as a direct result of allergens or inflammatory mediators, conditioned reflex due to prolonged scratching, and changes in the circadian rhythm of multiple substances. Firstly, AD patients often experience increased nocturnal scratching during disease flares, which can disrupt sleep. Secondly, prolonged nocturnal scratching may gradually become a conditioned reflex, leading to insomnia and cognitive behavioral problems. The itch-scratch cycle leads to impaired sleep and transforms acute insomnia into long-term chronic insomnia. Nocturnal scratching also leads to tissue damage, the release of inflammatory mediators, and pruritus [8, 10]. Released mediators and substances can exacerbate sleep disturbances, as they can induce hyperalgesia to sensory pain. Finally, this association may be related to changes in the circadian rhythms of cytokines and melatonin production [11]. In general, cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ show increased performance at night and facilitate sleep. Conversely, cytokines such as IL-4, IL-10 and IL-13 rise in the early morning and promote wakefulness. One study showed that a lower IFN-γ/ IL-4 ratio in AD patients was associated with reduced sleep efficiency [56]. In addition, another study showed that IL-6 levels were higher in AD patients in the morning [57]. This increase may lead to difficulties in waking up in the morning, daytime drowsiness, and thus disruption of nocturnal sleep. Changes in the expression levels of these cytokines in AD may disrupt normal circadian rhythms and constitute an important mechanism for the development of sleep disorders in AD patients [5860].

According to subgroup analysis, the prevalence of sleep disturbance in AD varies slightly across geographic locations. The highest prevalence is observed in Africa, possibly due to the increased prevalence of AD in Africans in recent years [61]. Patients in Africa are at higher risk of developing loss of encoding filaggrin (FLG) than patients from other regions [62, 63]. FLG is the main structural protein of the epidermis and plays a key role in supporting the skin barrier. As a result, FLG loss can lead to damage to the skin barrier, and promote inflammation and T-cell infiltration, leading to AD, which in turn increases the risk of sleep disorders. Patients with hospital-derived AD show a notably higher prevalence of sleep disturbances compared to non-hospital-derived patients. This could be ascribed to the fact that AD patients seeking hospital care often present with more severe conditions, thereby increasing their likelihood of experiencing sleep disturbances. Furthermore, the prevalence of sleep disturbances among AD patients is the highest in studies published between 2016 and 2025. This might be attributable to the enhanced accuracy in diagnosing the related clinical manifestations of AD over the past few years, which in turn, has elevated the detection rate of both AD and sleep disturbances. Previous research has indicated that for well over a century, no consensus on AD has been reached, where the pathophysiological mechanism of AD remains equivocally defined. The nomenclature utilized in the clinical diagnosis of AD worldwide remains inconsistent. In fact, earlier articles have employed the term "atopic eczema" and even "eczema" to delineate AD [64]. Patients with severe to very severe AD exhibit the highest prevalence of sleep disturbances, which may be associated with certain AD severity scoring scales like the SCORAD [65] and POEM [66]. These scales include sleep disturbances as a parameter in assessing the severity of AD, thus correlating higher severity grades with an increased prevalence of sleep disorders. Among the various sleep disturbance assessment scales, AD patients evaluated with the PROMIS tool are found to have the highest prevalence of sleep disturbances, possibly because PROMIS primarily focuses on assessing various aspects of sleep quality, sleep depth, and the restoration associated with sleep. Additionally, it considers difficulties and concerns related to falling asleep or maintaining it. The scale also extends its scope to aspects of alertness during waking hours, somnolence, and feelings of fatigue. The PROMIS scale offers a more nuanced assessment of sleep disturbances compared to other scales like the PSQI or the BISQ. Consequently, the number of individuals identified with sleep disturbances tends to be higher in those assessed by PROMIS, which might explain the elevated prevalence of sleep disturbances reported in AD patients using this tool. In a narrow sense, sleep disturbances are often equated with insomnia. Thus, most articles simply classify sleep issues into insomnia, which may contribute to the observed higher prevalence rates of insomnia compared to somnolence. Additionally, physiologically, there exists a circadian variation in skin blood flow [10], which could potentially disrupt the circadian rhythms in AD patients [5860]. This disruption might be another significant contributor to the increased prevalence of nocturnal insomnia in AD patients. According to our subgroup analysis based on the frequency of sleep disturbances per week, the prevalence rate of sleep disturbances from 0 to 3 days per week was the highest in AD patients. This result might be attributable to a higher proportion of patients with mild to moderate AD in the research cohort.

This systematic review has several limitations. Firstly, only four major databases were searched, and studies published in journals not included in the four databases may have provided more insights or different perspectives on this research topic. Hence, some existing evidence may be omitted. Omitting these studies may introduce selection bias, which could affect the overall findings or conclusions of our review. Secondly, during the data organization process, we found that most studies lacked data on the prevalence of sleep disorders across different age groups. Therefore, it is impossible to conduct relevant analyses. In fact, the existing AD literature primarily focuses on the pediatric population, with a lack of research on adults. Further studies are needed to explore the impact of age as a confounding variable on the prevalence of AD sleep disorders. Finally, among the 32 articles, only three had data on the comorbidity of AD and the prevalence of sleep disorders, and their comorbidities were different. It is recommended that future research pay more attention to these variables.

Conclusions

In conclusion, patients with AD have significantly higher rates of sleep disturbances compared to the general population, and a greater number of AD patients in Africa suffer from sleep disorders. The prevalence of sleep disorders was significantly higher in the last decade compared with previous years. Furthermore, sleep disorders were positively correlated with the severity of AD. Sleep disturbances are more commonly observed in the following populations: those from African regions, subjects recruited from hospital settings, studies published between 2016 and 2025, individuals with severe to very severe AD, those assessed using the PROMIS scales, those who awaken at least three times during the night, and those with sleep disturbances for 0 to 3 days a week. The relationship between AD and sleep disturbances is not yet fully understood, and further research should be dedicated to exploring the link and the underlying mechanisms between the two conditions.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

403_2025_4176_MOESM1_ESM.tif (500.8KB, tif)

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 25 KB) File S1 Search strategy

403_2025_4176_MOESM2_ESM.tif (1,018.1KB, tif)

Supplementary file2 (TIF 1868 KB) Fig. S1 Forest plot for regions

403_2025_4176_MOESM3_ESM.tif (554.1KB, tif)

Supplementary file3 (TIF 2172 KB) Fig. S2 Forest plot for the source of the data

403_2025_4176_MOESM4_ESM.tif (401.6KB, tif)

Supplementary file4 (TIF 2174 KB) Fig. S3 Forest plot for the years of publication

403_2025_4176_MOESM5_ESM.docx (17.6KB, docx)

Supplementary file5 (TIF 852 KB) Fig. S4 Forest plot for the severity of AD

403_2025_4176_MOESM6_ESM.docx (24.6KB, docx)

Supplementary file6 (TIF 501 KB) Fig. S5 Forest plot for the assessment scales of sleep disturbances

403_2025_4176_MOESM7_ESM.tif (1.8MB, tif)

Supplementary file7 (TIF 1018 KB) Fig. S6 Forest plot for the classification of sleep disturbances

403_2025_4176_MOESM8_ESM.tif (2.1MB, tif)

Supplementary file8 (TIF 554 KB) Fig. S7 Forest plot for nocturnal awakening issues

403_2025_4176_MOESM9_ESM.tif (2.1MB, tif)

Supplementary file9 (TIF 402 KB) Fig. S8 Forest plot for the number of days with sleep disturbances per week

403_2025_4176_MOESM10_ESM.tif (851.6KB, tif)

Supplementary file10 (DOCX 18 KB) File S2. The details of excluded articles

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Writing—original draft preparation: Ningxin Zhang; Writing—review and editing: Huiyan Chi; Conceptualization: Ningxin Zhang, Ping Song; Methodology: Ningxin Zhang, Qiubai Jin; Formal analysis and investigation: Ningxin Zhang, Huiyan Chi, Qiubai Jin, Ping Song; Funding acquisition: Huiyan Chi; Resources: Ping Song; Supervision: Meiqi Sun, Yuechun Zhao, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Research on Enhancing the Evidence Level of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Clinical Evidence-Based Studies at Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences [grant number XYZX0201-01]. The funder had no role in the design, data collection, data analysis, andss reporting of this study.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Ningxin Zhang and Huiyan Chi have contributed equally to this work and should be considered as co-first authors.

References

  • 1.Langan SM, Irvine AD, Weidinger S (2020) Atopic dermatitis. Lancet 396(10247):345–360. 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31286-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jeremian R, Malinowski A, Oh ES, Gooderham M, Sibbald C, Yeung J et al (2024) Epigenetic and biological age acceleration in children with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob 3(3):100275. 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cao XL, Wang SB, Zhong BL, Zhang L, Ungvari GS, Ng CH et al (2017) The prevalence of insomnia in the general population in china: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 12(2):e0170772. 10.1371/journal.pone.0170772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Institute of Medicine Committee on Sleep M, Research (2006) The national academies collection: Reports funded by national institutes of health. In: Colten HR, Altevogt BM, editors. Sleep disorders and sleep deprivation: An unmet public health problem. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). Copyright © 2006, National Academy of Sciences [PubMed]
  • 5.Buysse DJ (2013) Insomnia Jama 309(7):706–716. 10.1001/jama.2013.193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kushida CA, Chang A, Gadkary C, Guilleminault C, Carrillo O, Dement WC (2001) Comparison of actigraphic, polysomnographic, and subjective assessment of sleep parameters in sleep-disordered patients. Sleep Med 2(5):389–396. 10.1016/s1389-9457(00)00098-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ohayon MM (2002) Epidemiology of insomnia: What we know and what we still need to learn. Sleep Med Rev 6(2):97–111. 10.1053/smrv.2002.0186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Irwin MR (2019) Sleep and inflammation: Partners in sickness and in health. Nat Rev Immunol 19(11):702–715. 10.1038/s41577-019-0190-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bawany F, Northcott CA, Beck LA, Pigeon WR (2021) Sleep disturbances and atopic dermatitis: relationships, methods for assessment, and therapies. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 9(4):1488–1500. 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.12.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Patel T, Ishiuji Y, Yosipovitch G (2007) Nocturnal itch: Why do we itch at night? Acta Derm Venereol 87(4):295–298. 10.2340/00015555-0280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chang YS, Chiang BL (2016) Mechanism of sleep disturbance in children with atopic dermatitis and the role of the circadian rhythm and melatonin. Int J Mol Sci 17(4):462. 10.3390/ijms17040462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jeon C, Yan D, Nakamura M, Sekhon S, Bhutani T, Berger T et al (2017) Frequency and management of sleep disturbance in adults with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 7(3):349–364. 10.1007/s13555-017-0192-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Salfi F, Amicucci G, Ferrara M, Tempesta D, De Berardinis A, Chiricozzi A et al (2023) The role of insomnia in the vulnerability to depressive and anxiety symptoms in atopic dermatitis adult patients. Arch Dermatol Res 315(6):1577–1582. 10.1007/s00403-023-02538-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xerfan EMS, Tomimori J, Andersen ML, Tufik S, Facina AS (2020) Sleep disturbance and atopic dermatitis: a bidirectional relationship? Med Hypotheses 140:109637. 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chang YS, Chiang BL (2018) Sleep disorders and atopic dermatitis: a 2-way street? J Allergy Clin Immunol 142(4):1033–1040. 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sánchez-Pérez J, Daudén-Tello E, Mora AM, Lara SN (2013) Impact of atopic dermatitis on health-related quality of life in spanish children and adults: the pseda study. Actas Dermosifiliogr 104(1):44–52. 10.1016/j.ad.2012.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Simpson EL, Bieber T, Eckert L, Wu R, Ardeleanu M, Graham NM et al (2016) Patient burden of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (ad): Insights from a phase 2b clinical trial of dupilumab in adults. J Am Acad Dermatol 74(3):491–498. 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.10.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lei D, Yousaf M, Janmohamed SR, Vakharia PP, Chopra R, Chavda R et al (2020) Validation of four single-item patient-reported assessments of sleep in adult atopic dermatitis patients. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 124(3):261–266. 10.1016/j.anai.2019.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The prisma 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. 10.1136/bmj.n71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Munn Z, Moola S, Lisy K, Riitano D, Tufanaru C (2015) Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. Int J Evid Based Healthc 13(3):147–153. 10.1097/xeb.0000000000000054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hunter JP, Saratzis A, Sutton AJ, Boucher RH, Sayers RD, Bown MJ (2014) In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 67(8):897–903. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ahn HJ, Shin MK, Seo JK, Jeong SJ, Cho AR, Choi SH et al (2019) Cross-sectional study of psychiatric comorbidities in patients with atopic dermatitis and nonatopic eczema, urticaria, and psoriasis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 15:1469–1478. 10.2147/ndt.S191509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hamid AM, Qurtas DS (2020) Growth parameters in children with atopic dermatitis in erbil city, kurdistan region-iraq. Bali Med J 9:745. 10.15562/BMJ.V9I3.1949
  • 24.Bragazzi N, Garbarino S, Chattu VK, Pacifico A, Malagoli P, Pigatto P et al. (2021) Sleep quality in parents with children affected by psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis or atopic dermatitis: A multicenter cross-sectional study. J Biol Regul Homeostatic Agents 10.23812/21-288-A
  • 25.Atefi N, Rohaninasab M, Shooshtari M, Behrangi E, Mehran G, Goodarzi A et al (2019) The association between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and atopic dermatitis: a study among iranian children. Indian J Dermatol 64(6):451–455. 10.4103/ijd.IJD_458_18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Arima K, Gupta S, Gadkari A, Hiragun T, Kono T, Katayama I et al (2018) Burden of atopic dermatitis in japanese adults: analysis of data from the 2013 national health and wellness survey. J Dermatol 45(4):390–396. 10.1111/1346-8138.14218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Abdullah AH, Nathan AM, Jayanath S, Kwan Z, Azanan MS, Hng SY et al (2023) Poor sleep quality in children with atopic dermatitis and its effects on behavior: a multicenter cross-sectional study from a low-middle-income country. Pediatr Int 65(1):e15473. 10.1111/ped.15473 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Camfferman D, Kennedy JD, Gold M, Martin AJ, Winwood P, Lushington K (2010) Eczema, sleep, and behavior in children. J Clin Sleep Med 6(6):581–588 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chamlin SL, Mattson CL, Frieden IJ, Williams ML, Mancini AJ, Cella D et al (2005) The price of pruritus: Sleep disturbance and cosleeping in atopic dermatitis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 159(8):745–750. 10.1001/archpedi.159.8.745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ziyab AH, Holloway JW, Ali YM, Zhang H, Karmaus W (2023) Eczema among adolescents in kuwait: Prevalence, severity, sleep disturbance, antihistamine use, and risk factors. World Allergy Organ J 16(1):100731. 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chawla V, Hogan MB, Moonie S, Fenwick GL, Hooft A, Wilson NW (2016) Parental perception of efficacy of antihistamines for pruritus in pediatric atopic dermatitis. Allergy Asthma Proc 37(2):157–163. 10.2500/aap.2016.37.3927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Choi WJ, Ko JY, Kim JW, Lee KH, Park CW, Kim KH et al (2012) Prevalence and risk factors for atopic dermatitis: a cross-sectional study of 6,453 korean preschool children. Acta Derm Venereol 92(5):467–471. 10.2340/00015555-1252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Eckert L, Gupta S, Amand C, Gadkari A, Mahajan P, Gelfand JM (2017) Impact of atopic dermatitis on health-related quality of life and productivity in adults in the united states: an analysis using the national health and wellness survey. J Am Acad Dermatol 77(2):274-279.e273. 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.04.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Eckert L, Gupta S, Gadkari A, Mahajan P, Gelfand JM (2019) Burden of illness in adults with atopic dermatitis: analysis of national health and wellness survey data from france, germany, italy, spain, and the united kingdom. J Am Acad Dermatol 81(1):187–195. 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.03.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Egeberg A, Anderson P, Piercy J, Massey L, Cappelleri JC, Encinas GA et al (2021) Symptom burden of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol 31(6):752–758. 10.1684/ejd.2021.4166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Emerson RM, Charman CR, Williams HC (2000) The nottingham eczema severity score: preliminary refinement of the rajka and langeland grading. Br J Dermatol 142(2):288–297. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03300.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang J, Loman L, Oldhoff M, Schuttelaar MLA (2022) Association between moderate to severe atopic dermatitis and lifestyle factors in the dutch general population. Clin Exp Dermatol 47(8):1523–1535. 10.1111/ced.15212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fishbein AB, Cheng BT, Tilley CC, Begolka WS, Carle AC, Forrest CB et al (2021) Sleep disturbance in school-aged children with atopic dermatitis: prevalence and severity in a cross-sectional sample. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 9(8):3120-3129.e3123. 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.04.064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gerner T, Haugaard JH, Vestergaard C, Deleuran M, Jemec GB, Mortz CG et al (2021) Disease severity and trigger factors in danish children with atopic dermatitis: a Nationwide Study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 35(4):948–957. 10.1111/jdv.17007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Silverberg JI, Chiesa-Fuxench Z, Margolis D, Boguniewicz M, Fonacier L, Grayson M et al (2022) Epidemiology and burden of sleep disturbances in atopic dermatitis in us adults. Dermatitis 33(6s):S104-s113. 10.1097/der.0000000000000731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Girolomoni G, Luger T, Nosbaum A, Gruben D, Romero W, Llamado LJ et al (2021) The economic and psychosocial comorbidity burden among adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in europe: Analysis of a cross-sectional survey. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 11(1):117–130. 10.1007/s13555-020-00459-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gregoriou S, Stefanou G, Kontodimas S, Sfaelos K, Zavali M, Vakirlis E et al. (2022) Burden of atopic dermatitis in adults in greece: results from a Nationwide Survey. J Clin Med 10.3390/jcm11164777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 43.Rangel SM, Kim T, Sheth A, Blumstein A, Lai JS, Cella D et al (2023) Prevalence and associations of fatigue in childhood atopic dermatitis: a cross-sectional study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 37(4):763–771. 10.1111/jdv.18819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hanifin JM, Reed ML (2007) A population-based survey of eczema prevalence in the united states. Dermatitis 18(2):82–91. 10.2310/6620.2007.06034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Irwanto I, Ningtiar H, Hidayat T, Putera A, Hikmah Z, Endaryanto A (2019) Sleep problems in 0–36 months old indonesian children with atopic dermatitis. Dermatol Rep. 10.4081/dr.2019.8039 [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kim B, Jung H, Kim J, Lee J, Kim O (2020) Depressive symptoms and sleep disturbance in female nurses with atopic dermatitis: The korea nurses’ health study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 10.3390/ijerph17082743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yamaguchi H, Tada S, Nakanishi Y, Kawaminami S, Shin T, Tabata R et al (2015) Association between mouth breathing and atopic dermatitis in japanese children 2–6 years old: a population-based cross-sectional study. PLoS One 10(4):e0125916. 10.1371/journal.pone.0125916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kwatra SG, Gruben D, Fung S, DiBonaventura M (2021) Psychosocial comorbidities and health status among adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a 2017 us national health and wellness survey analysis. Adv Ther 38(3):1627–1637. 10.1007/s12325-021-01630-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Torun EG, Ertugrul A, Tekguc DC, Bostanci I (2020) Sleep patterns and development of children with atopic dermatitis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 181(11):871–878. 10.1159/000509402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Strom MA, Silverberg JI (2016) Associations of physical activity and sedentary behavior with atopic disease in united states children. J Pediatr 174:247-253.e243. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.03.063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sorour FA, Abdelmoaty AA, Bahary MH, El Birqdar B (2017) Psychiatric disorders associated with some chronic dermatologic diseases among a group of egyptian dermatology outpatient clinic attendants. J Egypt Women’s Dermatol Soc 14:31–36 [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Moraes MM, Vaz FPC, Roque R, Mallozi MC, Solé D, Wandalsen GF (2024) Behavioral disorders in children and adolescents with atopic dermatitis. J Pediatr (Rio J) 100(1):93–99. 10.1016/j.jped.2023.08.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lim JH, Jang YS, Kim DB, Jang SY, Park EC (2024) Association between body mass index and atopic dermatitis among adolescents: Findings from a national cross-sectional study in korea. PLoS One 19(7):e0307140. 10.1371/journal.pone.0307140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Guo M, Su J, Zheng S, Chen B (2023) Objective sleep in atopic dermatitis: a meta-analysis. Dermatitis 34(2):145–150. 10.1089/derm.2022.29005.mgu [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Xie QW, Dai X, Tang X, Chan CHY, Chan CLW (2019) Risk of mental disorders in children and adolescents with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychol 10:1773. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chang YS, Chou YT, Lee JH, Lee PL, Dai YS, Sun C et al (2014) Atopic dermatitis, melatonin, and sleep disturbance. Pediatrics 134(2):e397-405. 10.1542/peds.2014-0376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bender BG, Ballard R, Canono B, Murphy JR, Leung DY (2008) Disease severity, scratching, and sleep quality in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 58(3):415–420. 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.10.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Geiger SS, Fagundes CT, Siegel RM (2015) Chrono-immunology: Progress and challenges in understanding links between the circadian and immune systems. Immunology 146(3):349–358. 10.1111/imm.12525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Opp MR (2005) Cytokines and sleep. Sleep Med Rev 9(5):355–364. 10.1016/j.smrv.2005.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Krueger JM, Obál FJ, Fang J, Kubota T, Taishi P (2001) The role of cytokines in physiological sleep regulation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 933:211–221. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05826.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Deckers IA, McLean S, Linssen S, Mommers M, van Schayck CP, Sheikh A (2012) Investigating international time trends in the incidence and prevalence of atopic eczema 1990–2010: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. PLoS One 7(7):e39803. 10.1371/journal.pone.0039803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sandilands A, Terron-Kwiatkowski A, Hull PR, O’Regan GM, Clayton TH, Watson RM et al (2007) Comprehensive analysis of the gene encoding filaggrin uncovers prevalent and rare mutations in ichthyosis vulgaris and atopic eczema. Nat Genet 39(5):650–654. 10.1038/ng2020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.McAleer MA, Irvine AD (2013) The multifunctional role of filaggrin in allergic skin disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 131(2):280–291. 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.12.668 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bieber T (2016) Why we need a harmonized name for atopic dermatitis/atopic eczema/eczema! Allergy 71(10):1379–1380. 10.1111/all.12984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: The scorad index (1993) Consensus report of the european task force on atopic dermatitis. Dermatology 186(1):23–31. 10.1159/000247298 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 66.Charman CR, Venn AJ, Williams HC (2004) The patient-oriented eczema measure: Development and initial validation of a new tool for measuring atopic eczema severity from the patients’ perspective. Arch Dermatol 140(12):1513–1519. 10.1001/archderm.140.12.1513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

403_2025_4176_MOESM1_ESM.tif (500.8KB, tif)

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 25 KB) File S1 Search strategy

403_2025_4176_MOESM2_ESM.tif (1,018.1KB, tif)

Supplementary file2 (TIF 1868 KB) Fig. S1 Forest plot for regions

403_2025_4176_MOESM3_ESM.tif (554.1KB, tif)

Supplementary file3 (TIF 2172 KB) Fig. S2 Forest plot for the source of the data

403_2025_4176_MOESM4_ESM.tif (401.6KB, tif)

Supplementary file4 (TIF 2174 KB) Fig. S3 Forest plot for the years of publication

403_2025_4176_MOESM5_ESM.docx (17.6KB, docx)

Supplementary file5 (TIF 852 KB) Fig. S4 Forest plot for the severity of AD

403_2025_4176_MOESM6_ESM.docx (24.6KB, docx)

Supplementary file6 (TIF 501 KB) Fig. S5 Forest plot for the assessment scales of sleep disturbances

403_2025_4176_MOESM7_ESM.tif (1.8MB, tif)

Supplementary file7 (TIF 1018 KB) Fig. S6 Forest plot for the classification of sleep disturbances

403_2025_4176_MOESM8_ESM.tif (2.1MB, tif)

Supplementary file8 (TIF 554 KB) Fig. S7 Forest plot for nocturnal awakening issues

403_2025_4176_MOESM9_ESM.tif (2.1MB, tif)

Supplementary file9 (TIF 402 KB) Fig. S8 Forest plot for the number of days with sleep disturbances per week

403_2025_4176_MOESM10_ESM.tif (851.6KB, tif)

Supplementary file10 (DOCX 18 KB) File S2. The details of excluded articles

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Archives of Dermatological Research are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES