Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 1;197(4):497. doi: 10.1007/s10661-025-13917-7

Table 1.

Description of the 20 study watersheds. Physiographic provinces are based on Fenneman (1938)

USGS station ID Short name Station type Watershed area, km2 Impervious cover, % Monitoring period, yrs Dominant physiographic province
01646305 DEAD Intensive 5.3 35.7 14 Piedmont
01645704 DIFF Intensive 14.2 32.2 15 Piedmont
01656903 FLAT Intensive 10.9 33.4 15 Triassic
01654500 LONG Intensive 9.6 29.1 10 Piedmont
01645762 SFLIL Intensive 7.0 15.8 15 Piedmont
0165694286 BRR Trend 8.8 48.3 15 Piedmont
01645940 CAPT Trend 3.6 14.8 15 Piedmont
01657394 CASTLE Trend 5.7 7.2 15 Piedmont
01653844 DOGUE Trend 1.1 34.1 10 Coastal Plain
0165690673 FROG Trend 2.6 35.7 15 Triassic
0164425950 HPEN Trend 3.1 28.2 10 Triassic
01652789 INDIAN Trend 6.3 38.1 15 Piedmont
01645745 LIL DIFF Trend 7.7 13.9 15 Piedmont
01645844 OCSB Trend 3.8 52.5 15 Piedmont
01657322 PHCT Trend 2.5 21.5 15 Piedmont
01653717 PSB Trend 4.9 32.4 15 Coastal Plain
01655305 RABT Trend 1.5 33.9 10 Piedmont
01644343 SUGAR Trend 1.7 21.1 10 Triassic
01652860 TURKEY Trend 6.7 34.8 15 Coastal Plain
01657100 WSB Trend 2.5 25.4 10 Piedmont