Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 2;15(13):10049–10073. doi: 10.1039/d4ra07932a

Table 12. Comparison of thermal properties between the prepared cell-4/CF/PEG SS-PCM and similar SS-PCMs.

SS-PCM T m a (°C) ΔHm (J g−1) T c a (°C) ΔHc (J g−1) T SC (°C) k (W m−1 °C−1) Leakageb Reference
60 wt% paraffin + 40 wt% cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) 55.4 173.6 48.1 171.9 7.3 0.037 Low 60
80 wt% paraffin + 20 wt% cellulose foam 49.0 148.5 54.7 150.4 5.7 0.077 Low 61
89.2 wt% PEG 6000 + 5.5 wt% cellulose aerogel + 5.3 wt% graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) 63.0 156.1 44.3 148.9 18.7 1.60 Low 20
96.97 wt% PEG 6000 + 1.52 wt% microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) aerogel + 1.51 wt% graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) 61.1 182.6 37.0 177.7 24.1 1.03 Low 62
50 wt% PEG 6000 + 25 wt% cellulose nanocrystalline (CNC) + 25 wt% reduced graphene oxide (rGO) 64.9 183.2 35.0 165.9 29.9 0.44 Low 63
80.1 wt% PEG 4000 + 19.9 wt% expanded graphite aerogel (EGA) 53.4 148.9 36.6 128.5 16.8 3.74 Low 64
95.3 wt% PEG 2000 + 2.87 wt% Fe3O4 + 1.83 wt% cellulose hydrogel 56.7 172.6 28.8 163.7 27.9 0.41 Low 65
64.21 wt% PEG 2000 + 0.75 wt% CF + 1.79 wt% cell-4 51.28 163.32 27.45 135.92 23.83 0.027 Low Present work
a

These values refer to the peak temperatures.

b

Leakage range: <5% = low, 5% ≪ 10% = medium, >10% = high.