Table 4.
Estimate (95% CI) for |
||
Type of Analysis and ARP | τ | λ |
Subsetsa: | ||
Full siblings | 73.0 (63.3–82.7) | 1.4 (1.1–2.0) |
First cousins: | ||
Solution 1 | 24.1 (9.8–38.5) | 1.4 (.8–2.3) |
Solution 2 | 92.3 (77.2–107.3) | 1.4 (.9–2.0) |
Avuncular pairs | 58.1 (25.0–91.2) | 1.3 (.6–3.4) |
Model Cb: | ||
Full siblings | 1.4 (1.1–2.0) | |
First cousins | 1.3 (.8–1.9) | |
Avuncular pairs | 1.2 (.8–2.1) | |
Common τ | 72.9 (64.1–81.7) | |
Model λc | 72.7 (64.2–81.1) | 1.4 (1.1–1.7) |
Separate τ and C were fit for each different ARP subset.
A common τ with different C coefficients for the different ARP types.
The C coefficients were modeled as dependent on a single common λ, simultaneously with a single τ.