Skip to main content
Veterinary Medicine and Science logoLink to Veterinary Medicine and Science
. 2025 Apr 2;11(3):e70315. doi: 10.1002/vms3.70315

Applications and Considerations of Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Sciences: A Narrative Review

Hesameddin Akbarein 1, Mohammad Hussein Taaghi 2, Mahyar Mohebbi 3, Parham Soufizadeh 2,4,
PMCID: PMC11964155  PMID: 40173266

ABSTRACT

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has brought about a significant transformation in healthcare, streamlining manual tasks and allowing professionals to focus on critical responsibilities while AI handles complex procedures. This shift is not limited to human healthcare; it extends to veterinary medicine as well, where AI's predictive analytics and diagnostic abilities are improving standards of animal care. Consequently, healthcare systems stand to gain notable advantages, such as enhanced accessibility, treatment efficacy, and optimized resource allocation, owing to the seamless integration of AI. This article presents a comprehensive review of the manifold applications of AI within the domain of veterinary science, categorizing them into four domains: clinical practice, biomedical research, public health, and administration. It also examines the primary machine learning algorithms used in relevant studies, highlighting emerging trends in the field. The research serves as a valuable resource for scholars, offering insights into current trends and serving as a starting point for those new to the field.

Keywords: artificial Intelligence, machine learning, veterinary sciences


Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing veterinary sciences. This review categorizes AI applications into clinical practice, biomedical research, public health, and administration, highlighting the impact of machine learning, deep learning, and natural language processing. Key algorithms such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), support vector machines (SVMs), and random forests (RF) drive advancements in disease prediction, diagnostic imaging, and decision‐making. Emerging trends and challenges are discussed, offering a foundation for future research and innovation in veterinary science.

graphic file with name VMS3-11-e70315-g003.jpg


Abbreviations

ADE

adverse drug event

AGI

artificial general intelligence

AI

artificial intelligence

AIAV

avian influenza A virus

AIV

avian influenza virus

ALA

alimentary lymphoma

ALB

albumin

ANN

artificial neural network

ASI

artificial superintelligence

BOAS

brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome

BT

bluetongue

BW

blood work

CAD

computer‐aided detection

CBC

complete blood count

CE

chronic enteropathy

CHA

canine hypoadrenocorticism

CKD

chronic kidney disease

CNNs

convolutional neural networks

CT‐scan

computed tomography scan

DT

decision tree

ECG

electrocardiogram

EHR

electronic health record

ES

expert system

EWS

early disease warning system

FDA

Food and Drug Administration

FEI

Fédération Équestre Internationale

FMT

faecal microbiota transplantation

GBM

gradient boosting machine

GGT

gamma‐glutamyl transfer

GIS

Geographic Information System

GSA

gas sensor array

HA

hemagglutinin

HGS

horse grimace scale

HR

heart rate

IBD

inflammatory bowel disease

IBK

infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis

IMU

inertial measurement unit

IP

infected premise

IVEP

in vitro embryo production

KELM

kernal extreme learning machine

KNN

k‐nearest neighbour

LDA

linear discriminant analysis

LP

low pathogenic

LPAI

low‐pathogenicity avian influenza

LSTM

long short‐term memory

MAT

microscopic agglutination test

mCT

micro‐CT scan

ML

machine learning

MLM

machine learning prediction model

MLP

multi‐layer perceptron

MMVD

myxomatous mitral valve disease

MRI

magnetic resonance imaging

NA

neuraminidase

NLP

natural language processing

ODH

one digital health

OLS

ordinary least square

PAF

proximal arterial fibrillation

PCM

progressive cardiomyopathy

PFS

progression‐free survival

PH

pulmonary hypertension

PMN

polymorphonuclear leukocyte

PRRS

porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome

PSB

proximal sesamoid bone

RDF

robotic dairy farm

RF

random forest

RIVIMS

reliable and intelligent veterinary information system

RNN

recurrent neural network

RS

respiratory system

SAPS‐3

simplified acute physiology score 3

SC

serum chemistry

sEMG

surface electromyographic

SOM

self‐organizing map

SPAR

symmetric projection attractor reconstruction

STS

soft‐tissue sarcoma

SVM

support vector machine

THI

temperature‐humidity index

TP

total protein

TR

thoracic radiograph

WOA

whale optimization algorithm

1. Introduction

The traditional approach in medicine often involves developing treatments based on general patient needs. This can lead to inaccuracies, such as false positives and negatives, as it may not account for individual differences (Bouchemla et al. 2023). The digitization of medical processes has brought optimism for achieving greater precision in healthcare outcomes (Lekadir et al. 2022). Recently, there has been increased interest in applying artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare (Ismail et al. 2022). AI, which integrates concepts and methods from fields such as software engineering, data science, and statistics, has advanced significantly since the 1950s due to improvements in computational power (Ezanno et al. 2021). Its integration with biomedicine, supported by the availability of large healthcare datasets, has driven much of this progress (Alnasser 2023).

In various fields, AI has automated manual healthcare systems, enabling professionals to concentrate on complex tasks while AI manages data analysis and decision‐making support (Ahmad et al. 2023; Ali et al. 2023). This transformation is also evident in veterinary sciences, where AI enhances animal healthcare through improved predictive analytics and diagnostic accuracy (Bouchemla et al. 2023). AI is expected to not only increase access to healthcare and improve treatment quality but also optimize resource use, thereby boosting the efficiency of healthcare systems (Endo 2024). In veterinary healthcare, AI shows great promise, particularly in enhancing diagnostic precision, with applications ranging from medical imaging and disease prognosis to telemedicine (Shriya 2024).

The COVID‐19 pandemic has further accelerated the adoption of AI technologies in medical and veterinary settings, highlighting its essential role in addressing health challenges for both humans and animals (Lekadir et al. 2022). Despite its potential, integrating AI into veterinary medicine necessitates careful planning to balance its benefits and risks. Regulatory frameworks are vital to address socio‐ethical issues, including clinical safety, fair access to veterinary services, data privacy, responsible use of AI, and regulatory oversight (Lekadir et al. 2022). To manage these complexities, stakeholders advocate for strong frameworks that evaluate risk–benefit profiles and ensure accountability in the application of AI in veterinary sciences.

This narrative review examines the applications of AI in veterinary sciences, categorizing them into clinical practice, biomedical research, public health, and administration. It highlights AI's transformative potential in enhancing diagnostics, optimizing resources, and improving overall animal healthcare. The review focuses on the most prevalent AI algorithms and methods used in the field, such as machine learning, deep learning, and natural language processing, and their applications in tasks such as disease prediction and diagnostic imaging. Through a synthesis of the literature, the review identifies emerging trends, research gaps, and future opportunities for innovation. It also addresses critical challenges, including ethical concerns, data privacy, and the need for effective regulatory frameworks. While this study does not encompass all works in the field, it provides valuable insights into AI's role in veterinary medicine and offers a foundation for future research and development. Furthermore, by focusing on the algorithms and methods, this review provides valuable insights into the practical applications of AI, offering a foundation for future research and development.

2. Methodology

This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the applications of AI in veterinary sciences, with a particular focus on the most commonly used algorithms and methods in this field. A detailed search was conducted across major academic databases, including Wiley, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Google Scholar, using keywords ‘artificial intelligence’, ‘machine learning’, ‘veterinary sciences’, ‘AI applications in veterinary’, ‘AI in medicine’, ‘AI algorithms in medicine’, and ‘AI algorithms in veterinary science’. The search identified a total of 187 relevant articles. The selection process was guided by specific inclusion criteria: studies must focus on AI applications within veterinary medicine, published in English in peer‐reviewed journals, and relevant to the field's applications, methodologies, challenges, or trends. Articles that were primarily theoretical or not directly applicable to veterinary sciences were excluded. Following this, 170 articles, including both original research and review papers, were included in the final analysis.

The articles were categorized into four main domains: clinical practice, biomedical research, public health, and administration. Within each domain, the studies were examined to identify the key AI algorithms and methods used in veterinary applications. Particular attention was paid to the types of algorithms, and how these are applied to tasks such as diagnostic imaging, disease prognosis, and resource optimization.

3. Applications

The application of AI in veterinary sciences has led to significant advancements, particularly in improving diagnostic accuracy, optimizing resource allocation, and enhancing overall healthcare delivery. AI technologies, such as machine learning and deep learning, have proven effective in processing large datasets and identifying complex patterns, making them valuable tools across various domains, including clinical practice, biomedical research, public health, and administration (Figure 1). This section examines the diverse applications of AI within these domains, highlighting their impact on veterinary science. By analyzing current uses and emerging trends, this part provides an overview of AI's transformative potential in the field.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

A synopsis of the classifications utilized in the implementation of artificial intelligence within the realm of veterinary sciences.

3.1. Clinical Practice

Within the clinical practice domain, a total of 89 articles underwent examination and review, with 22 specifically focusing on review articles. AI tools have found utility across various medical fields such as internal medicine, diagnostic imaging, histopathology, clinical pathology, and so forth, among others, in both small and large animal medicine. The original studies in this field are organized and presented in Table 1 based on their application domains.

TABLE 1.

Clinical practice.

Title Subcategory Information/objectives Algorithm Reference
Fish disease diagnosis program—Problems and some solutions Aquatic medicine The exploration of various ES techniques culminates in the development of Fish‐Vet, a hybrid system capable of providing timely and accurate diagnoses.  N.A. (Zeldis and Prescott 2000)
Cognitive intelligence in fog computing‐inspired veterinary healthcare Care and monitoring This research introduces a comprehensive smart home‐based health monitoring framework for veterinary purposes.  N.A. (Bhatia et al. 2021)
Predicting the rectal temperature of dairy cows using infrared thermography and multimodal machine learning Care and monitoring An approach for estimating the rectal temperature of dairy cows is proposed in the study, based on non‐invasive real‐time monitoring of their respiration rates, the temperature‐humidity index (THI) of the environment, and analysis of infrared images.

CNN

ANN

Dense module

(Brezov et al. 2023)
Detection of cutaneous tumors in dogs using deep learning techniques Clinical pathology Cutaneous tumours—A total of 1500 original cytologic images were collected for this study. Preliminary tests were conducted, and a deep learning‐based approach for image analysis and classification using convolutional neural networks (CNN) is proposed. CNN (Zapata et al. 2020)
Evaluation of supervised machine learning algorithms to distinguish between inflammatory bowel disease and alimentary lymphoma in cats Clinical pathology The models underwent training and testing using data derived from complete blood count (CBC) and serum chemistry (SC) analyses conducted on three distinct groups of client‐owned cats: those categorized as normal, diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), or suffering from alimentary lymphoma (ALA).

Naïve bayes

DT

ANN

(Awaysheh et al. 2016)
Exploratory analysis of methods for automated classification of laboratory test orders into syndromic groups in veterinary medicine Clinical pathology The study details the utilization of machine learning algorithms, specifically Naïve Bayes and decision trees, alongside rule‐based methodologies, to extract syndromic data from laboratory test requests received by a veterinary diagnostic facility.

Naïve bayes

DT

(Dórea et al. 2013)
Using convolutional neural networks for determining reticulocyte percentage in cats Clinical pathology Results are presented for a real‐world task in veterinary medicine, typically performed manually: feline reticulocyte percentage. CNN (Vinicki et al. 2018)
e‐Veterinary system for diagnosis of viral infections in poultry Farm management This underscores the requirement for a readily accessible medical health system capable of early diagnosis of these lethal poultry diseases, which possess the potential to decimate entire flocks of poultry birds in a single occurrence. Expert system (Sani et al. 2019)
Detection of necrosis in digitised whole‐slide images for better grading of canine soft‐tissue sarcomas using machine‐learning Histopathology Canine soft‐tissue sarcomas (STSs)—The introduction of digital pathology holds the potential to enhance STS grading by automating the determination of necrosis presence and extent. CNN (Morisi et al. 2023)
Image classification and automated machine learning to classify lung pathologies in deceased feedlot cattle Histopathology The aim of this study was to develop machine learning‐based image classification models to assess the diagnostic accuracy of respiratory system (RS) conditions in right lateral necropsied lungs of feedlot cattle. Automated ML (Bortoluzzi et al. 2023)
OncoPetNet: A deep learning based AI system for mitotic figure counting on H&E stained whole slide digital images in a large veterinary diagnostic lab setting Histopathology This study marks the first successful automated deployment of deep learning systems for achieving real‐time expert‐level performance on significant histopathology tasks at scale within a high‐volume clinical practice. DL (Fitzke, Whitley, et al. 2021)
A method for labelling lesions for machine learning and some new observations on osteochondrosis in computed tomographic scans of four pig joints Diagnostic imaging The objective of this study was to outline a methodology for labelling articular osteochondrosis lesions in CT scans of four pig joints, aimed at guiding the development of forthcoming machine learning algorithms. Additionally, the study aimed to document novel observations identified during the labelling process.  N.A. (Olstad et al. 2022)
A methodological approach for deep learning to distinguish between meningiomas and gliomas on canine MR‐images Diagnostic imaging The present study aims to (1) ascertain the accuracy of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN, GoogleNet) in distinguishing between meningiomas and gliomas in pre‐ and post‐contrast T1 images as well as T2 images and (2) devise an image classifier, utilizing the most accurate MRI sequence and CNN combination, to forecast whether a lesion corresponds to a meningioma or a glioma. CNN (Banzato et al. 2018)
A radiomics platform for computing imaging features from µCT images of Thoroughbred racehorse proximal sesamoid bones: Benchmark performance and evaluation Diagnostic imaging A radiomics platform will be developed to enable the comparison of features extracted from micro‐CT scans (mCT) of proximal sesamoid bones (PSB) in horses that experienced catastrophic fractures with those that did not.  N.A. (Basran et al. 2021)
An AI‐based algorithm for the automatic classification of thoracic radiographs in cats Diagnostic imaging An artificial intelligence (AI)‐based computer‐aided detection (CAD) algorithm was developed and tested to identify some of the most prevalent radiographic findings in the feline thorax. CNN (Banzato et al. 2021)
Deep learning in veterinary medicine, an approach based on CNN to detect pulmonary abnormalities from lateral thoracic radiographs in cats Diagnostic imaging First fine‐tuned on human chest X‐rays and then further fine‐tuned on 500 annotated TR images from the veterinary campus of VetAgro Sup (Lyon, France), a CNN based on ResNet50V2 pre‐trained on ImageNet was employed. CNN (Dumortier et al. 2022)
Development of an artificial intelligence‐based method for the diagnosis of the severity of myxomatous mitral valve disease from canine chest radiographs Diagnostic imaging An artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm was developed and tested to classify various stages of myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD) from canine thoracic radiographs. CNN (Valente et al. 2023)
Equine radiograph classification using deep convolutional neural networks Diagnostic imaging This study evaluates the capability of deep convolutional neural networks to classify anatomical location and projection in 48 standard views of racehorse limbs by training, validating, and testing six deep learning architectures using 9504 equine pre‐import radiographs. CNN (Da Silva et al. 2022)
Improving the classification of veterinary thoracic radiographs through inter‐species and inter‐pathology self‐supervised pre‐training of deep learning models Diagnostic imaging A solution is presented that enables higher classification scores to be obtained through knowledge transfer from inter‐species and inter‐pathology self‐supervised learning methods.  N.A. (Celniak et al. 2023)
Machine learning can appropriately classify the collimation of ventrodorsal and dorsoventral thoracic radiographic images of dogs and cats Diagnostic imaging The feasibility of machine learning algorithms for classifying appropriate collimation of the cranial and caudal borders in ventrodorsal and dorsoventral thoracic radiographs was determined. CNN (Tahghighi et al. 2023)
Pilot study: Application of artificial intelligence for detecting left atrial enlargement on canine thoracic radiographs Diagnostic imaging The goal of this retrospective, pilot project was to apply deep learning artificial intelligence techniques using thoracic radiographs for the detection of canine left atrial enlargement and compare the results with those of veterinary radiologist interpretations. CNN (S. Li et al. 2020)
RapidRead: Global deployment of state‐of‐the‐art radiology AI for a large veterinary teleradiology practice Diagnostic imaging The development and real‐world deployment of a deep learning‐based AI system for evaluating canine and feline radiographs across a broad range of findings and abnormalities are described in this study. Ensembling (Fitzke, Stack, et al. 2021)
Using deep learning to detect spinal cord diseases on thoracolumbar magnetic resonance images of dogs Diagnostic imaging In this study, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained and tested using thoracolumbar MR images obtained from 500 dogs. CNN (Biercher et al. 2021)
Using machine learning to classify image features from canine pelvic radiographs: Evaluation of partial least squares discriminant analysis and artificial neural network models Diagnostic imaging The purpose of this study was to evaluate two machine learning statistical models for automatically identifying image regions containing the canine hip joint on ventrodorsal pelvis radiographs.

PLS‐DA

ANN

(Mcevoy and Amigo 2013)
39 Using artificial intelligence to analyze horse gait parameters for genomics research in musculoskeletal traits Internal medicine Pilot work employed consumer‐level digital video cameras to capture high‐resolution, high‐speed videos of horses trotting during mandatory veterinary inspections for FEI‐level competitions.  N.A. (Smythe et al. 2021)
A machine learning tutorial for veterinarians: Examples using canine atopic dermatitis Internal medicine Binary classification models were trained to predict treatment success in patients with canine atopic dermatitis and to classify a patient's status as either a case or control.  N.A. (Bollig et al.
An artificial neural network‐based model to predict chronic kidney disease in aged cats Internal medicine For kidney disease, a sensitive and specific model will be constructed to predict chronic kidney disease (CKD) in cats early on. This will be achieved by employing artificial neural network (ANN) techniques on routine health screening data. ANN (Biourge et al. 2020)
An equine disease diagnosis expert system based on improved reasoning of evidence credibility Internal medicine In terms of knowledge representation, the structure of equine disease diagnosis knowledge underwent analysis utilizing an ontology system. Expert system (Gao et al. 2019)
Artificial intelligence as a tool to aid in the differentiation of equine ophthalmic diseases with an emphasis on equine uveitis Internal medicine A software tool was developed to assist in diagnosing equine ophthalmic diseases, with a particular focus on uveitis. DL (May et al. 2022)
Automated prediction of mastitis infection patterns in dairy herds using machine learning Internal medicine This study aims to diagnose the predominant route of mastitis transmission in dairy cattle, differentiating between contagious and environmental sources, with further subdivision of environmental transmission into dry and lactating periods. RF (Hyde et al. 2020)
BrachySound: Machine learning based assessment of respiratory sounds in dogs Internal medicine Machine learning models were utilized to objectively analyze 366 audio samples from 69 Pugs and 79 other brachycephalic breeds. These samples were recorded with an electronic stethoscope during a 15‐min standardized exercise test. KNN (Oren et al. 2023)
Cattle disease auxiliary diagnosis and treatment system based on data analysis and mining Internal medicine This study presents the collection of a substantial volume of multi‐source cattle electronic medical record data, which is then utilized for data analysis and mining technology to develop an intelligent diagnosis system for cattle diseases.  N.A. (Niu et al. 2020)
Cerebrospinal fluid and serum proteomic profiles accurately distinguish neuroaxonal dystrophy from cervical vertebral compressive myelopathy in horses Internal medicine Novel proteomic techniques and machine learning algorithms were evaluated to predict biomarkers that could assist in the antemortem diagnosis of noninfectious spinal ataxia in horses. RF (Donnelly et al. 2023)
Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: A seroprevalence study on small ruminants Internal medicine The primary aim of this study is to improve the accuracy of BT risk prediction by leveraging machine learning (ML) approaches, thereby contributing to the fulfilment of this objective.

LR

ANN

RF

DT

(Gouda et al. 2022)
Computer vision model for the detection of canine pododermatitis and neoplasia of the paw Internal medicine The novel object detection model Pawgnosis, a Tiny YOLOv4 image analysis model deployed on a microcomputer with a camera, was tested for the rapid detection of canine pododermatitis and neoplasia. CNN (Smith et al. 2024)
Detecting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation from normal sinus rhythm in equine athletes using Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction and machine learning Internal medicine The aim was to detect PAF subjects from normal sinus rhythm equine electrocardiograms (ECGs) by employing the Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction (SPAR) method to encapsulate waveform morphology and variability, forming the foundation of a machine learning classification.

KNN

SVM

(Huang et al. 2022)
Disease and pharmacologic risk factors for first and subsequent episodes of equine laminitis: A cohort study of free‐text electronic medical records Internal medicine Electronic medical records from first opinion equine veterinary practice were explored as a unique resource for epidemiologic research. The suitability of this resource for risk factor analyses was investigated as part of a study on clinical and pharmacologic risk factors for laminitis. Text mining (Welsh et al. 2017)
E‐nose equipped with artificial intelligence technology for diagnosis of dairy cattle disease in veterinary Internal medicine The primary objective of this project, conducted at Neurofy AB, was to develop an AI recognition algorithm, also referred to as a gas sensing algorithm, based on artificial intelligence (AI) technology. This algorithm aimed to detect or predict dairy cattle diseases using odour signal data collected, measured, and provided by a gas sensor array (GSA), also known as an electronic nose or simply E‐nose, developed by the company.

LR

SVM

LDA

RFC

DL

(Haselzadeh 2021)
Early detection of avian diseases based on thermography and artificial intelligence Internal medicine This study aimed to develop a novel and rapid method for poultry disease diagnosis utilizing thermography for data collection and artificial intelligence for data analytics.

SVM

ANN

(M. Sadeghi et al. 2023)
Early detection of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis with artificial intelligence Internal medicine Artificial intelligence (AI) was developed to distinguish cattle by their muzzle patterns and identify early cases of disease, including infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (IBK). RCNN (Gupta et al. 2023)
ECG restitution analysis and machine learning to detect paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Insight from the equine athlete as a model for human athletes Internal medicine The investigation sought to determine if the arrhythmogenic substrate present between paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) episodes could be detected using restitution analysis of normal sinus‐rhythm ECGs. KNN (Huang et al. 2021)
Equine simplified acute physiology score: Personalised medicine for the equine emergency patient Internal medicine The objectives were (i) to modify the simplified acute physiology score 3 (SAPS‐3) model for equine use, achieving an accuracy margin exceeding 75% in predicting survival or mortality probabilities, and (ii) to develop a decision tree aiding attending veterinarians in evaluating the clinical progression of equine patients. WEKA (de Barros et al. 2021)
Identifying associations between pig pathologies using a multi‐dimensional machine learning methodology Internal medicine The identification of associations between different pathologies aids in enhancing the comprehension of their underlying biological connections and supports veterinarians in promoting control strategies aimed at reducing the prevalence of multiple conditions simultaneously.  N.A. (Sanchez‐Vazquez et al. 2012)
Lameness scoring system for dairy cows using force plates and artificial intelligence Internal medicine The aim of this study is to develop an automated lameness scoring system comparable to conventional subjective lameness scoring through the use of artificial neural networks. ANN (Mokaram Ghotoorlar et al. 2012)
Machine learning algorithm as a diagnostic tool for hypoadrenocorticism in dogs Internal medicine In this study, machine learning methods were employed to aid in the diagnosis of CHA using routinely collected screening diagnostics (complete blood count and serum chemistry panel).  N.A. (Reagan et al. 2020)
Machine learning and canine chronic enteropathies: A new approach to investigate FMT effects Internal medicine The main objective of this study was to report the clinical effects of oral freeze‐dried FMT in CE dogs, comparing the faecal microbiomes of three groups: pre‐FMT CE‐affected dogs, post‐FMT dogs, and healthy dogs. RF (Innocente et al. 2022)
Machine learning for syndromic surveillance using veterinary necropsy reports Internal medicine In this study, machine learning methods for conducting syndromic surveillance using free‐text veterinary necropsy reports were evaluated.

LR

SVM

CART

RF

Bagging trees

Gradient tree boosting

LSTM

(Bollig et al. 2020)
Machine‐learning based prediction of Cushing's syndrome in dogs attending UK primary‐care veterinary practice Internal medicine This article discusses the application of machine learning algorithms to predict Cushing's syndrome in dogs, showing promising results with potential for assisting veterinarians in diagnosis and improving clinical decision‐making.

LASSO

RF

SVM

(Schofield et al. 2021)

New direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy

teaching methodology for veterinary doctors

Internal medicine The utilization of a low‐cost, easy‐to‐implement model that facilitates learning about direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy supports the correct and early diagnosis of diseases that can threaten animals’ vision and life.  N.A. (Dos Santos Martins et al. 2022)
Pig‐vet: A web‐based expert system for pig disease diagnosis Internal medicine When a pig exhibits disease symptoms, making an accurate diagnosis is crucial to support control strategies. Diagnosing diseases in pigs demands substantial expertise, with only a few experts possessing this ability, each within their specific domain. To enhance accessibility and reduce waiting times, an expert system named Pig‐Vet has been developed. Expert system (Zetian et al. 2005)
Predicting dynamic clinical outcomes of the chemotherapy for canine lymphoma patients using a machine learning model Internal medicine The methodology for dynamically determining remission probabilities and prospects of progression‐free survival (PFS) for individual patients is described.  N.A. (Koo et al. 2021)
Predicting early risk of chronic kidney disease in cats using routine clinical laboratory tests and machine learning Internal medicine A model to predict the risk of cats developing chronic kidney disease (CKD) using data from electronic health records (EHRs) collected during routine veterinary practice is derived. RNN (Bradley et al. 2019)
Prediction of immunoglobulin G in lambs with artificial intelligence methods Internal medicine The prediction of serum IgG concentration from gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT) enzyme activity, total protein (TP) concentration, and albumin (ALB) is proposed.

ANN

MARS

SVR

FNN

(Cihan et al. 2021)
The complexity of clinically‐normal sinus‐rhythm ECGs is decreased in equine athletes with a diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Internal medicine The hypothesis posited that the proarrhythmic background existing between fibrillation episodes in paroxysmal AF (PAF) could be discernible through complexity analysis of ostensibly normal sinus‐rhythm ECGs.

Lempel‐Ziv ’76

Lempel‐Ziv ’78

Titchener T‐complexity

(Alexeenko et al. 2020)
Training convolutional neural networks to score pneumonia in slaughtered pigs Internal medicine The present study aims to develop an AI‐based method capable of recognizing and quantifying lesions resembling enzootic pneumonia on digital images obtained from slaughtered pigs in routine abattoir conditions. CNN (Bonicelli et al. 2021)
Use of machine‐learning algorithms to aid in the early detection of leptospirosis in dogs Internal medicine Machine‐learning algorithms were employed to analyze clinical variables from the initial day of hospitalization for the creation of machine‐learning prediction models (MLMs). These models integrated patient signalment and clinicopathologic data, either with or without a MAT titer obtained at patient intake (= BW + MAT model). SVM (Reagan et al. 2022)
Using a gradient boosted model for case ascertainment from free‐text veterinary records Internal medicine This study aimed to achieve precise case recognition for feline upper respiratory tract infections through the application of natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques.

NLP

GBM

(Kennedy et al. 2023)
Using artificial intelligence to detect, classify, and objectively score severity of rodent cardiomyopathy Internal medicine A computer‐assisted image analysis algorithm was developed utilizing a fully convolutional network deep learning technique to detect and quantify microscopic features of PCM (degeneration/necrosis, fibrosis, mononuclear cell infiltration, mineralization) in rat heart histologic sections. CNN (Tokarz et al. 2021)
Using artificial intelligence to predict survivability likelihood and need for surgery in horses presented with acute abdomen (Colic) Internal medicine The machine learning algorithms achieved a 76% accuracy in predicting the need for surgery and an 85% accuracy in estimating the likelihood of survivability for horses presenting with acute abdomen (colic).

DT

Multilayer perceptron

Bayes network

Naïve bayes

(Fraiwan and Abutarbush 2020)
VetTag: Improving automated veterinary diagnosis coding via large‐scale language modeling Internal medicine Here, a large‐scale algorithm is developed to automatically predict all 4577 standard veterinary diagnosis codes from free text. The algorithm is trained on a curated dataset comprising over 100,000 expert‐labelled veterinary notes, along with more than one million unlabelled notes.

SVM

CNN

LSTM

etc.

(Y. Zhang et al. 2019)
Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: Novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non‐lame sheep Internal medicine Twenty‐three datasets (10 non‐lame and 13 lame sheep) were utilized from an accelerometer‐ and gyroscope‐based ear sensor with a sampling frequency of 16 Hz to develop and compare algorithms capable of discerning lameness across three distinct activities (walking, standing, and lying).

RF

ANN

SVM

AdaBoost

KNN

(Kaler et al. 2020)
Can a machine learn to see horse pain? An interdisciplinary approach towards automated decoding of facial expressions of pain in the horse (p159) Pain management Equine facial expressions were prioritized as crucial indicators of pain, forming the primary input metrics for machine learning analysis.  N.A. (Andersen et al. 2018)
Pain assessment in horses using automatic facial expression recognition through deep learning‐based modeling Pain management The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a machine vision algorithm to assess the pain level in horses, using an automatic computational classifier based on the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) and trained by a machine learning method. CNN (Lencioni et al. 2021)
Dynamics are important for the recognition of equine pain in video Pain management A deep recurrent two‐stream architecture is proposed for the task of distinguishing pain from non‐pain in videos of horses.

RNN

LSTM

(Broomé et al. 2019)
Improving gait classification in horses by using inertial measurement unit (IMU) generated data and machine learning Sport medicine In this study, a comprehensive network of wireless, high sampling‐rate sensors combined with machine learning techniques was utilized to achieve fully automated gait classification.

SVM

FCnn

LSTM

(Serra Bragança et al. 2020)
Investigating the performance of deep learning algorithms for muscle activation on/off‐set detection in horse surface electromyography (sEMG) data Sport medicine The application of advanced machine learning techniques, namely convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and long short‐term memory (LSTM) networks, for the segmentation of equine surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals is investigated in this study.

CNN

LSTM

(Andrei 2023)
Using different combinations of body‐mounted IMU sensors to estimate speed of horses—A machine learning approach Sport medicine To address these challenges, we explored the feasibility of estimating horse speed by developing machine learning (ML) models utilizing data from seven body‐mounted inertial measurement units (IMUs).

RF

SVM

GPR

BT

DT

(Darbandi et al. 2021)
Validation of a deep learning‐based image analysis system to diagnose subclinical endometritis in dairy cows Theriogenology A deep learning‐based software was validated for quantifying PMN proportions in endometrial cytology slides, showing substantial repeatability and agreement with traditional methods at higher PMN cut‐offs. This provides a reliable, automated tool for diagnosing subclinical endometritis in dairy cows. Oculyze MUH (H. Sadeghi et al. 2022)
Manual versus deep learning measurements to evaluate cumulus expansion of bovine oocytes and its relationship with embryo development in vitro Theriogenology Cumulus expansion, a key indicator of oocyte maturation, was evaluated using three methods, with area measurement proving most reliable. A deep learning model, AI‐xpansion, was developed based on this method, achieving human‐level performance and accurately predicting embryo development outcomes.  N.A. (Raes et al. 2024)
Can in vitro embryo production be estimated from semen variables in Senepol breed by using artificial intelligence? Theriogenology This study aimed to model in vitro embryo production (IVEP) estimates in Senepol animals by analyzing various sperm attributes. Retrospective data from 290 IVEP routines, utilizing 38 commercial doses of semen from Senepol bulls, were employed for this analysis.  N.A. (Campanholi et al. 2023)

Abbreviation: N.A., not available.

In each of these fields, AI demonstrates common applications. Its integration into veterinary medicine offers numerous advantages, particularly in assisting clinicians and researchers in disease diagnosis and pattern recognition. AI technologies, such as machine learning and deep learning, have shown effectiveness in processing large datasets and identifying complex patterns, which are crucial for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and understanding disease mechanisms (Akinsulie 2024; Bouchemla et al. 2023; Jacob et al. 2022). Without AI, many of these patterns might remain undiscovered, as traditional methods often struggle to analyze the vast amounts of data generated in veterinary practice (Appleby and Basran 2022; Kim et al. 2022). AI's ability to process extensive datasets reveals novel correlations among clinical signs, laboratory results, and diagnostic images, thereby enhancing understanding of diseases and reducing the likelihood of misdiagnosis (Albadrani 2024). This improved understanding of disease–symptom relationships also facilitates the early detection of diseases in animals, helping to prevent or reduce complications before they occur (Lustgarten et al. 2020; Woldemariam et al. 2018). The effective use of AI tools by clinicians contributes to the improvement of medical services, as supported by various research studies.

Based on the previously discussed features, the primary focus will be on using AI for early disease diagnosis, with particular emphasis on internal diseases, as categorized under internal medicine in Table 1. Notably, over 51% of the reviewed articles within the clinical practice domain pertain to this category. These articles cover a broad spectrum of topics, encompassing various animal groups investigated in veterinary medicine. A significant portion of these studies concentrates on the internal medicine of small animals, addressing diverse diseases including chronic conditions, cardiology (such as diagnosing heart enlargement or analyzing electrocardiograms), and spinal cord lesions. For instance, Biourge et al. (2020) developed a model for early prediction of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in aged cats using artificial neural network (ANN) techniques. Additionally, Tokarz et al. (2021) devised a computer‐assisted image analysis algorithm aimed at detecting and quantifying the microscopic features of rodent progressive cardiomyopathy (PCM) in rat and mouse hearts. This algorithm not only identifies pathological findings but also classifies and assigns severity scores to them (Tokarz et al. 2021). Furthermore, some studies extend to the internal medicine of large animals, such as horse, cattle, and sheep, albeit not to the same extent as in small animals. The work conducted by Gouda and colleagues, utilizing ML approaches, provides a compelling example of AI application in large animal internal medicine. Their research focuses on predicting the risk of bluetongue disease, showcasing the potential of AI to address critical issues in veterinary medicine (Gouda et al. 2022).

Table 1 provides several other examples within this domain. Notably absent from the literature search are studies in exotic animal medicine, indicating a gap in research within this niche (unless limited by search keywords). Nevertheless, studies in other fields such as porcine medicine, avian medicine, aquatic animal medicine, and theriogenology are evident. Additionally, regardless of animal type, other areas of study such as oncology, emergency medicine, sports medicine, and patient monitoring are also observed within this domain. The study conducted by Zeldis and Prescott (2000) exemplifies the application of AI in aquatic animal medicine. Despite the challenges inherent in developing a model for aquatic animal medicine due to the absence of an accepted database of cases and the vast array of diseases and species involved, this study presents a noteworthy achievement. It outlines the development of a hybrid system that enables clinicians to obtain timely and reasonable diagnoses (Zeldis and Prescott 2000). Another significant aspect is the utilization of AI across various types of data for this purpose. For instance, Oren et al. (2023) utilized ML techniques to analyze audio samples from dogs, aiming to diagnose brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome (BOAS) early on, which is crucial for effective treatment.

Following the domain of early disease diagnosis, the next most prevalent area of focus is imaging, representing over 20% of the reviewed articles, underscoring its significance in veterinary medicine research and practice. AI demonstrates remarkable proficiency in image detection and pattern recognition, making it efficient in diagnostic imaging. Furthermore, AI's application extends beyond radiography to encompass other diagnostic imaging techniques such as computed tomography scan (CT‐scan) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The efficacy of AI in veterinary medical imaging is supported by numerous studies. Recent studies, such as Joslyn and Alexander (2022), highlight the feasibility of AI‐assisted detection of certain radiographic abnormalities in veterinary radiology, particularly within research settings. However, their work focuses on the development of AI algorithms and automated measurement tools, rather than offering a broad overview of diagnostic imaging (Joslyn and Alexander 2022). Predominantly, research in this area concentrates on small animals and equine medicine. Apart from the specific animal species under scrutiny, studies within this domain delve into various anatomical regions, encompassing the thoracic, abdominal, nervous system, and musculoskeletal systems, each exemplified by multiple instances in Table 1. Notably, thoracic imaging emerges as the primary focus for integrating AI with imaging, as underscored by Pereira et al. (2023).

The studies available in this field extend beyond the previously discussed areas and encompass a diverse range of topics. For instance, research has been conducted in histopathology, clinical pathology, patient management and monitoring, surgery, risk prediction, behavioural sciences, and more. Each of these fields presents different examples, some of which are occasionally provided in Table 1.

3.2. Biomedical Research

Biomedical research in veterinary science is crucial for enhancing animal health, welfare, and productivity, with direct implications for public health, food safety, and ultimately, human health (McConnell 2012; Min 2024; Rexroad et al. 2019). This research drives the development of innovative treatments, vaccines, and diagnostic tools, improving disease prevention and management in domesticated and wild animal populations (Rexroad et al. 2019). Furthermore, the integration of AI into veterinary biomedical research revolutionizes the field by enhancing data analysis, personalizing medical treatments, and optimizing animal care through advanced monitoring systems (Yerlikaya 2024). The application of AI technologies, such as machine learning, allows for the analysis of large datasets, revealing complex patterns that can lead to a better understanding of disease mechanisms and improved diagnostic accuracy (Hennessey et al. 2022). The synergy of biomedical research and AI fosters a more comprehensive understanding of animal health, ultimately contributing to improved outcomes for both animals and humans (Basran 2024). Among the studies reviewed, 25 focus on various aspects of biomedical research. The reviewed articles encompass various categories, with a selection of these articles presented in Table 2. It is important to note that exploring the application of AI in biomedical research falls outside the scope of this study and needs a more extensive discussion. Consequently, this section will provide only a brief mention of studies related to this area.

TABLE 2.

Biomedical research.

Title Subcategory Information/objectives Algorithm Reference
Analytical approaches for evaluating passive acoustic monitoring data: A case study of avian vocalizations Behavioural science Passive acoustic monitoring exemplifies a scenario where technological advancements have facilitated an influx of data that routinely exceeds the capacity for analysis, achieved through the use of unattended recording devices to capture environmental sound.  N.A. (Symes et al. 2022)
Applications of machine learning in behavioral ecology: Quantifying avian incubation behavior and nest conditions in relation to environmental temperature Behavioural science To enhance the analysis of incubation behaviour utilizing extensive thermal datasets, a programme named NestIQ was developed. It utilizes machine learning to facilitate parameter optimization, enabling the tracking of behaviour across diverse species. NestIQ (Hawkins and DuRant 2020)
Bioacoustic classification of avian calls from raw sound waveforms with an open‐source deep learning architecture Behavioural science Autonomous recordings of animal sounds for species detection represent a popular conservation tool, continually advancing in accuracy as audio hardware and software evolve. Present classification algorithms rely on sound features extracted from the recordings rather than the sound itself, yielding varying degrees of success. CNN (SincNet) (Bravo Sanchez et al. 2021)
Deciphering avian emotions: A novel AI and machine learning approach to understanding chicken vocalizations Behavioural science A novel approach to interspecies communication is presented, focusing on the comprehension of chicken vocalizations. CNN (Cheok et al. 2023)
Animal immunization, in vitro display technologies, and machine learning for antibody discovery Biotechnology The implementation of machine learning algorithms in antibody discovery campaigns is increasingly prevalent and is anticipated to be a significant area of development in the future.  N.A. (Laustsen et al. 2021)
The application of non‐parametric techniques to solve classification problems in complex datasets in veterinary epidemiology—An example Epidemiology This article suggests classification tree algorithms (ID3, C4.5, CHAID, CART) and artificial neural networks as non‐parametric alternatives. Their application is demonstrated using a field dataset comprising pig farms categorized into three levels of respiratory disease prevalence.

DT

ANN

(Stark 1999)
Characteristic sites in the internal proteins of avian and human influenza viruses Internal medicine Seven feature selection algorithms based on machine learning techniques were utilized to generate a novel and extensive selection of diverse sites from the nine internal proteins of influenza. These sites were chosen based on their statistical importance in differentiating avian from human viruses.  N.A. (King et al. 2010)
Comparative analysis of H1N1 avian influenza virus by multiple sequence alignment and support vector machine Internal medicine In this study, bioinformatics approaches were employed to identify factors potentially responsible for avian‐to‐human transmission in hemagglutinin (HA) sequences of H1N1. SVM (Liu, Zhang, and Zhou 2014)
Computational method for classification of avian influenza A virus using DNA sequence information and physicochemical properties Internal medicine A novel approach for classifying the AIAV sequences of the HA and NA genes into subtypes using DNA sequence data and physicochemical properties is introduced. This method only necessitates unaligned, full‐length, or partial sequences of HA or NA DNA as input.

Naïve bayes

SVM

KNN

DT

(Humayun et al. 2021)
Identification of pulmonary hypertension animal models using a new evolutionary machine learning framework based on blood routine indicators Internal medicine The present study proposes a kernel extreme learning machine (KELM) model, based on an enhanced whale optimization algorithm (WOA), for predicting PH mouse models. KELM (Hu et al. 2023)
The Pioneer 100 Horse Health Project: A systems biology approach to equine precision health research Internal medicine This thesis tackles the areas requiring attention to advance precision medicine by developing and utilizing resources to showcase its application in equine disease.  N.A. (Donnelly 2022)
Machine learning for the prediction of antiviral compounds targeting avian influenza A/H9N2 viral proteins Pharmacology The aim of this study is to characterize A/H9N2 more comprehensively, with the goal of facilitating the discovery of antiviral compounds capable of inhibiting its transmission.

MLP

LR

SVM

KNN

RF

GB

XGBoost

(Amiroch et al. 2022)
Making sense of pharmacovigilance and drug adverse event reporting: Comparative similarity association analysis using AI machine learning algorithms in dogs and cats Pharmacology The recently disseminated ADE data by the FDA for animal drugs and devices used in animals are leveraged to address this public and welfare concern.  N.A. (Xu et al. 2019)
BirdNET: A deep learning solution for avian diversity monitoring Avian medicine The task‐specific model architecture was derived from the family of residual networks (ResNets), comprising 157 layers with over 27 million parameters. It was trained using extensive data pre‐processing, augmentation, and mixup techniques. CNN (Kahl et al. 2021)
Risk prediction of three different subtypes of highly pathogenic avian influenza outbreaks in poultry farms: Based on spatial characteristics of infected premises in South Korea Risk prediction Twelve spatial variables were investigated for three subtypes of HPAI virus‐infected premises (IPs), including 88 H5N1, 339 H5N8, and 335 H5N6 IPs. Subsequently, two prediction models, employing statistical and machine learning algorithm approaches, were constructed from a case‐control study on the HPAI H5N8 epidemic, the most prolonged outbreak, involving 339 IPs and 626 non‐IPs.

Bayesian LR

XGBoost

(Yoo et al. 2022)
Scoring amino acid mutation to predict pandemic risk of avian influenza virus Risk prediction Avian influenza viruses pose a serious public health threat due to their ability to directly cross species barriers and infect humans, resulting in high fatality rates. Given their antigenic novelty, there is a need to analyze the pandemic risk associated with these viruses and develop a prediction model for virology applications. SVM (Qiang and Kou 2019)

Abbreviation: N.A., not available.

Notably, Mathis and Mathis (2020) showcase the application of AI and deep learning tools in measuring animal behaviour and using computer vision for 2D and 3D pose estimation. This innovative approach underscores AI's ability to simplify the understanding of animal behaviour, allowing for more accurate assessments and interventions. Behavioural research in animals is essential not only for improving animal welfare but also for enhancing human–animal interactions and ensuring the well‐being of working and companion animals (Mathis and Mathis 2020).

Another critical area is pharmacology, where veterinary research leads to new drugs and treatments for animals, some of which may later be adapted for human medicine. This cross‐species applicability is particularly evident in the study of zoonoses, which can be transmitted from animals to humans. For example, research by Amiroch et al. (2022) uses machine learning (ML) methods for virtual screening to identify antiviral candidates for avian influenza subtype A/H9N2 (Amiroch et al. 2022). The successful identification of effective antivirals not only protects animal health but also mitigates the risk of potential outbreaks in human populations.

Additionally, biomedical research in veterinary science encompasses the understanding and mitigation of drug effects and toxicity. Investigating how various substances affect animal health allows researchers to develop safer and more effective medications. This is crucial for maintaining the health of livestock, pets, and wildlife, as it ensures that treatments do not inadvertently cause harm (Lekadir et al. 2022). Drug‐associated adverse events result in significant healthcare expenses along with negative health outcomes. For instance, studies have shown that adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can lead to significant health risks in veterinary patients, with certain medications being identified as potential allergens or causing severe reactions (Gabriel 2023). Furthermore, the development of predictive models and scales to assess the likelihood of drug‐induced adverse reactions is essential for improving drug safety and efficacy in veterinary medicine (Werners and Fajt 2020). By understanding the pharmacological effects and potential toxicities of various substances, veterinary researchers can enhance drug development processes, ultimately leading to better health outcomes for animals and, by extension, humans (Kushnir et al. 2022; Martyshuk et al. 2022). In a study by Xu et al. (2019), AI was employed for comparative analysis of adverse drug events (ADEs). This study unveiled a high ADE association for two drugs commonly used in dogs and cats (Xu et al. 2019).

Health surveillance, another significant area of focus, involves monitoring animal populations for signs of emerging diseases. Early detection and intervention are crucial for preventing widespread outbreaks and ensuring food safety, as many pathogens can cross from animals to humans through the food supply and other transmission routes (H. Li et al. 2021). Influenza, as said before, can significantly impact both animal and human health, making surveillance of animal herds vital for preventing interspecies transmission. Studies have shown that as long as the influenza virus circulates in animals, humans working in livestock farms or those indirectly in contact with the animals are at risk of contracting the infection (X. Zhang et al. 2018). This emphasizes the need for a holistic approach to influenza surveillance and research across various health and agricultural sectors (Scorza and Pardi 2018). Furthermore, the recognition of zoonotic diseases and their potential to cause outbreaks highlights the importance of continuous monitoring and effective surveillance systems to mitigate risks associated with animal‐to‐human transmission (Rist et al. 2014; Wong et al. 2012). A study by Walsh et al. (2019) aims to enhance the efficiency of active surveillance programmes in wild bird populations by using ML methods. This approach is essential because active surveillance programmes are often resource‐intensive, and AI can help reduce costs and address other challenges associated with these tasks (Walsh et al. 2019).

Overall, the integration of AI in veterinary biomedical research further enhances its impact by enabling more accurate data analysis and personalized treatment strategies (Akinsulie 2024; Joslyn and Alexander 2022). AI's role in refining research methods and increasing precision highlights the importance of continued investment in this field to improve both animal health and public safety (Akinsulie 2024).

3.3. Public Health

Public health and veterinary healthcare are essential in protecting both human and animal populations from diseases, ensuring the overall welfare of communities and ecosystems (Lekadir et al. 2022). The integration of AI into public health practices significantly enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of disease surveillance, outbreak prediction, and response mechanisms. AI has shown great potential to improve public health efforts, including disease surveillance, outbreak detection, and clinical decision‐making (Madli 2024). Furthermore, AI can support research and data‐driven decision‐making, aiding in the identification, tracking, and monitoring of emerging public health threats (Jungwirth and Haluza 2023). This aligns closely with the principles of the ‘One Health’ approach, which emphasizes the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health (Sleeman et al. 2017). The use of AI in public health not only streamlines processes but also enhances the ability to respond to outbreaks swiftly, thereby improving overall public health outcomes (Ben‐Gal 2023). A study by Herrick et al. (2013) used ML methods to create a global‐scale predictive map of the avian influenza virus (AIV), achieving an accuracy of 0.79. This model, the first global‐scale model of low‐pathogenicity avian influenza (LPAI) in wild birds, underscores the need for more research in northern regions to understand AIV persistence (Herrick et al. 2013).

AI also bridges the gap between scientists and the general public, enhancing knowledge transfer between veterinarians and livestock holders. Dissemination of best practices, such as the benefits of artificial insemination for breeding to farmers in less‐favoured regions (Shehu et al. 2011), could be supported and accelerated through the use of AI. Furthermore, AI applications in veterinary medicine can facilitate the dissemination of knowledge regarding animal health and welfare, thereby empowering livestock holders to make informed decisions (Min 2024). By utilizing AI, veterinarians can provide tailored information and support to farmers, ultimately fostering a collaborative approach to livestock management and health (Rehman et al. 2022). This synergy not only improves animal welfare but also enhances productivity and sustainability in livestock farming (Robi 2023). A study by Chomyn et al. (2023) showcased AI's role in analyzing conversations between veterinarians and farmers about biosecurity. This analysis highlighted the negative effects of conflicting information and ineffective communication, while also pinpointing key points to foster agreement and improve biosecurity practices (Chomyn et al. 2023).

Overall, utilizing AI capabilities enables the public health and veterinary sectors to better anticipate, manage, and mitigate health risks. This integration ultimately contributes to the cultivation of healthier communities and ecosystems, underscoring the importance of collaborative efforts in safeguarding public and animal health. Table 3 includes some of these studies.

TABLE 3.

Public health.

Title Subcategory Information/objectives Method Reference
The ALEX algorithm—Estimating average lifetime antimicrobial exposure of Danish slaughter pigs in a fast, automated and robust way

Antimicrobial

resistance

The ALEX algorithm, developed as a fast, automated, and robust method, is utilized to estimate the average lifetime antimicrobial exposure of Danish slaughter pigs. ALEX (Bangsgaard et al. 2023)
Assessment of a joint farmer‐veterinarian discussion about biosecurity using novel social interaction analyses Biosecurity The aim of this study was to analyze discussions between dairy cattle farmers and veterinarians regarding the adoption of on‐farm biosecurity using novel social interaction methodologies.  N.A. (Chomyn et al. 2023)
Co‐created community contracts support biosecurity changes in a region where African swine fever is endemic—Part I: The methodology Biosecurity The objective of this study was to investigate the capacity of participatory action at community level with a broad inclusion of stakeholders to initiate change and greater stakeholder ownership to improve biosecurity in the smallholder pig value chain.  N.A. (Erika et al. 2023)
Machine‐learning algorithms to identify key biosecurity practices and factors associated with breeding herds reporting PRRS outbreak Biosecurity The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms to identify key biosecurity practices and factors associated with breeding herds self‐reporting (yes or no) a PRRS outbreak in the past 5 years.

RF

SVM

GBM

(Silva et al. 2019)
A global model of avian influenza prediction in wild birds: The importance of northern regions Public health The random forests algorithm, an ensemble data‐mining machine‐learning method, was employed to create a global‐scale predictive map of Avian Influenza Virus (AIV), ascertain significant predictors, and delineate the environmental niche of AIV within wild bird populations. RF (Herrick et al. 2013)
Data mining and model‐predicting a global disease reservoir for low‐pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) in the wider pacific rim using big datasets Avian medicine Here, an international approach is demonstrated for the Pacific Rim, showcasing the data mining and modelling of low‐pathogenicity avian influenza (LPAI) and its ecological niche using machine learning techniques and open‐access datasets, alongside Geographic Information Systems (GIS) at a 5‐km pixel resolution for optimal inference. RF (Gulyaeva et al. 2020)
A decision support framework for prediction of avian influenza Public health The aim was to design and evaluate a decision support framework that assists decision makers by addressing their inquiries about future event risks across diverse geographical scales.  N.A. (Yousefinaghani et al. 2020)
Using machine learning to predict swine movements within a regional program to improve control of infectious diseases in the US

Disease

control

programmes

In this study, a procedure is developed to replicate the structure of a network using available partial data. Subsequently, the model is utilized to predict animal movements among sites in 34 Minnesota counties. RF (Valdes‐Donoso et al. 2017)
Artificial intelligence and avian influenza: Using machine learning to enhance active surveillance for avian influenza viruses Surveillance Gradient boosted trees were employed to estimate the probability of isolating avian influenza viruses (AIV) from wild bird samples collected during AIV surveillance from 2006 to 2011 in the United States. GBT (Walsh et al. 2019)
Constructing a syndromic terminology resource for veterinary text mining Surveillance In constructing a text mining system for veterinary syndromic surveillance, automatic and semi‐automatic methods are employed to develop terminology at various stages.  N.A. (Furrer et al. 2015)

Abbreviation: N.A., not available.

3.4. Administrations

Administration is another field where AI applications can be profoundly useful, especially within the realm of veterinary services. Following the field of clinical practice, this category comprised the second largest number of studies, accounting for 21%. In Table 4, the original articles in this field are provided.

TABLE 4.

Administrations.

Title Subcategory Information/objectives Method Reference
A novel blockchain‐based integrity and reliable veterinary clinic information management system using predictive analytics for provisioning of quality health services Clinic management This study aims to fill a gap by proposing a novel blockchain‐based veterinary information management system called RIVIMS, which leverages smart contracts and machine learning techniques for enhanced reliability and intelligence. Blockchain (Iqbal et al. 2021)
Machine learning to classify animal species in camera trap images: Applications in ecology Ecology Machine learning models were trained utilizing convolutional neural networks employing the ResNet‐18 architecture and 3,367,383 images to autonomously classify wildlife species captured in camera trap images from five states across the United States. CNN (Tabak et al. 2019)
Practical classes: A platform for deep learning? Overall context in the first‐year veterinary curriculum Education The aim of this study is to evaluate the many practical formats that support the first‐year veterinary curriculum.  N.A. (Ryan et al. 2009)
Using machine learning in veterinary medical education: An introduction for veterinary medicine educators Education The purpose of this primer is to assist veterinary educators in appraising and potentially adopting these rapid upcoming advances in data science and technology.  N.A. (Hooper et al. 2023)
Animal biometric assessment using non‐invasive computer vision and machine learning are good predictors of dairy cows age and welfare: The future of automated veterinary support systems Farm management This study proposes the utilization of noninvasive video acquisition and biometric analysis of dairy cows in a robotic dairy farm (RDF).  N.A. (Fuentes et al. 2022)
Artificial intelligence applied to a robotic dairy farm to model milk productivity and quality based on cow data and daily environmental parameters Farm management This research utilized four years of data from a robotic dairy farm, comprising 36 cows with similar heat tolerance (Model 1), and all 312 cows from the farm (Model 2). The dataset included programmed concentrate feed and weight, along with weather parameters. Supervised machine learning fitting models were developed to predict milk yield, fat and protein content, and actual cow concentrate feed intake. ANN (Fuentes et al. 2020)
Artificial intelligence techniques for the prediction of body weights in sheep Farm management Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing various aspects of life, including animal husbandry. In this context, an attempt was made to compare two AI techniques for predicting 12‐month body weights of animals.

PCR

OLS

(Hamadani et al. 2022)
Assessing livestock disease in animals using a machine learning algorithm Farm management In this project, the extensive use of machine learning algorithms for livestock health management in preparing the animal dataset has resulted in a fast and efficient method.

SVM

LR

(Kumar and Mittapalli 2020)
Behavioral Monitoring tool for pig farmers: Ear tag sensors, machine intelligence, and technology adoption roadmap Farm management A remote monitoring tool is presented for objectively measuring behavioural indicators, including posture, gait, vocalization, and external temperature, which may aid in assessing health and welfare status.  N.A. (Pandey et al. 2021)
Combining expert knowledge and machine‐learning to classify herd types in livestock systems Farm management This study introduces a novel approach to classify herd types in livestock systems by integrating expert knowledge with a machine‐learning algorithm known as self‐organizing maps (SOMs). SOM (BDK) (Brock et al. 2021)
Detection and recognition of veterinary drug residues in beef using hyperspectral discrete wavelet transform and deep learning Farm management Control beef samples devoid of veterinary drug residues and four groups of beef treated with varying concentrations of metronidazole, ofloxacin, salbutamol, and dexamethasone under ambient conditions underwent analysis using 400–1000 nm hyperspectral imaging followed by multiplicative scatter correction preprocessing.

CNN

MLP

RF

SVM

(R. Jiang et al. 2022)
Machine learning application in growth and health prediction of broiler chickens Farm management The prediction accuracy of growth and body weight in broiler chickens.

ANN

SVM

(Milosevic et al. 2019)
Machine‐learning‐based calving prediction from activity, lying, and ruminating behaviors in dairy cattle Farm management The objective of this study was to use automated activity, lying, and rumination monitors to characterize prepartum behaviour and predict calving in dairy cattle.

RF

Linear discriminant ANN

(Borchers et al. 2017)
Predicting the body weight of Balochi sheep using a machine learning approach Farm management Several machine learning algorithms were employed to model and forecast the body weight of Balochi sheep breed rams in Pakistan.

LR

SVM

RF

(Huma and Iqbal 2019)
Seroprevalence and molecular identification of Brucella spp. In bovines in Pakistan—Investigating association with risk factors using machine learning Surveillance This study aimed to estimate the seroprevalence and molecular detection of bovine brucellosis and to assess the association of potential risk factors with test results.  N.A. (Khan et al. 2020)
Precision pre‐control system based on veterinary drug warehouse environment Warehouse In this study, an accurate pre‐control system based on veterinary medicine warehouse environment is designed based on environmental parameter acquisition method, environmental parameter prediction method and device regulation control method.  N.A. (Qiu et al. 2021)
Cross‐modality interaction network for equine activity recognition using time‐series motion data (p: 285) Animal welfare Automated equine activity recognition allows for continuous and remote monitoring of equine behavioural variations, offering valuable insights into equine health and welfare. This contributes to enhanced equine management and reduced workloads and costs in veterinary clinics. CNN (Mao et al. 2021)
Machine learning prediction of sleep stages in dairy cows from heart rate and muscle activity measures Animal welfare The objective of this study was to ascertain whether data solely from non‐invasive devices assessing neck muscle activity and heart rate (HR) could differentiate between sleep stages effectively.

ANN

RF

(Hunter et al. 2021)
Networked wearable sensors for monitoring health and activities of an equine herd: An IoT approach to improve horse welfare Animal welfare In this study, building upon previous success in developing wearable vital sign sensors for individual horses, the networking of these wearable sensors within a herd setting is showcased.  N.A. (Miller et al. 2023)
Time‐series‐based feature selection and clustering for equine activity recognition using accelerometers Animal welfare With over 16 million horses worldwide and nearly 60,000 sport horses registered in the International Federation for Equestrian Sports database, monitoring the activities and performance of these equines is emerging as a crucial aspect in horse management.

CNN

SVM

RF

(De Waele et al. 2023)

Abbreviation: N.A., not available.

In recent years, the integration of AI has revolutionized various aspects of veterinary administration, from clinic management to farm management and animal welfare. In clinics, AI‐driven software systems streamline administrative tasks such as appointment scheduling, billing, and inventory management, allowing veterinarians and staff to focus more on providing quality care to their animal patients. These systems can analyze vast amounts of data to optimize workflows, anticipate resource needs, and improve overall efficiency within the clinic environment. For example, Iqbal et al. (2021) proposed a novel blockchain‐based reliable and intelligent veterinary information management system (RIVIMS), which, although distinct from AI, can complement AI‐driven approaches by enhancing data accessibility, enforcing government security policies, and addressing the challenges of traditional information systems that often lack consistent structures for data security and reliability (Iqbal et al. 2021).

Moreover, AI is increasingly being utilized in farm management to enhance animal health and productivity. AI‐powered monitoring systems can track livestock behaviour, detect signs of illness or distress, and even predict disease outbreaks based on patterns in data collected from sensors and cameras. By providing real‐time insights and alerts, these technologies enable farmers to take proactive measures to prevent health issues and improve the welfare of their animals. For instance, Mittapalli (2020) demonstrated the effectiveness of ML techniques in solving common farm problems, noting that conventional methods of animal health tracking are prone to errors and are time‐consuming (Mittapalli 2020). Additionally, AI algorithms can analyze behaviour factors such as activity, sleeping, and feeding times to assess various points of interest for farmers. Borchers et al. (2017) used ML technology to create a model that, by collecting data from automated activity, lying, and rumination monitors, can predict calving in dairy cattle. Predicting parturition, a period of extreme value for both cows and their calves, helps provide timely calving assistance, reducing the risk of complications (Borchers et al. 2017). Other examples of AI applications in farm management are noted in Table 4.

Furthermore, AI applications extend to the realm of animal welfare, where they play a crucial role in monitoring and safeguarding the welfare of animals in various settings, including clinics and farms. AI‐driven image recognition technologies can analyze video footage from animal shelters or research facilities to identify signs of distress or illness among individual animals, enabling timely intervention and care. For example, Miller et al. (2023) developed a network of wearable vital sign sensors for individual horses in an equine herd. By collecting and analyzing data such as heart rate, location, and motion, each horse's behaviour can be studied, monitored, and compared with other horses. This analysis can highlight unusual patterns that may indicate health problems, enabling timely intervention and reducing the need for emergency clinical care (Miller et al. 2023). By integrating AI into both clinic administration and broader fields like farm management, society can advance towards more efficient, humane, and sustainable practices in animal care and welfare.

4. Algorithms and Methods

4.1. Definition of AI

To comprehend the functioning and implementation of AI in veterinary practice, a foundational grasp of pertinent concepts and terminology is imperative (Appleby and Basran 2022). AI within the realm of computer science is dedicated to devising systems capable of executing tasks typically necessitating human intelligence. It constitutes a comprehensive domain encompassing various subfields and methodologies. While contemporary AI applications have predominantly emerged within the last decade, the foundational concepts have been extant for approximately seven decades (Tran et al. 2019). The genesis of AI can be traced back to the late 1940s and early 1950s, notably highlighted by Alan Turing's proposition of computers executing intelligent functions in 1950, and the formal coinage of the term ‘artificial intelligence’ by John McCarthy in 1955. Despite considerable research efforts in the latter half of the 20th century, AI's practical application and scope remained constrained due to limitations in computational capabilities (Kaul et al. 2020). However, significant strides in processing power over the past decade, coupled with the digitalization and accessibility of extensive datasets, have propelled AI into a phase of rapid development and deployment (Kaul et al. 2020; Tang et al. 2018; Tran et al. 2019).

AI can be categorized into different types based on its scope and capabilities. Contrary to popular portrayals in fiction, true artificial general intelligence (AGI) or artificial superintelligence (ASI) surpassing human intellect remains speculative. Present‐day AI primarily operates within the domain of narrow intelligence, focusing on specific tasks (Fjelland 2020). ML, a prominent subfield of AI, entails training algorithms to undertake tasks by discerning patterns from data, obviating the need for explicit programming (Waljee and Higgins 2010). Supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and semisupervised learning are fundamental modes of ML, each with distinct characteristics and applicability. Classical ML techniques encompass algorithms such as support vector machines (SVM) and decision trees (DT), primarily reliant on supervised learning paradigms (F. Jiang et al. 2017). In contrast, contemporary ML involves ANNs and deep learning, with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) serving as a prevalent model for medical image analysis. Moreover, AI extends into natural language processing (NLP), enabling computers to interpret and attribute significance to textual and verbal inputs. This capability is indispensable for expeditiously extracting information from voluminous medical records, thus streamlining clinical workflows (Chartrand et al. 2017).

The application of ML methods in veterinary sciences has witnessed substantial growth, reflecting an increasing interest in leveraging computational techniques to improve healthcare outcomes. Through a comprehensive review of studies, a diverse range of ML models across various veterinary domains have been identified. This analysis focuses on the utilization of AI algorithms within these studies, aiming to enhance the understanding of prevalent algorithms and inform future research endeavours. Efforts have been made to assist researchers in delineating prevalent classifications in veterinary sciences and providing a list of utilized models, enabling them to discern prevailing trends and anticipate future actions in their respective fields of inquiry.

4.2. Algorithm Utilization Across Veterinary Domains

A total of 160 algorithms were used across all the reviewed articles, covering 60 different models. CNNs, SVM, random forests (RFs), ANNs, DT, k‐nearest neighbours (KNN), and naïve bayes emerged as the predominant algorithm models, with CNNs and SVM leading the list (Figure 2). In contrast to earlier research, recent investigations indicate a shift towards more sophisticated algorithms like CNNs and SVMs, signifying the dynamic evolution of ML in veterinary sciences. While Cihan et al.’s (2021) study emphasized traditional statistical techniques, the current trend showcases a preference for advanced algorithms, likely driven by advancements in computational capabilities and algorithmic research (Cihan et al. 2019). This transformation underscores the adaptability of AI to evolving paradigms, highlighting the importance of staying abreast of emerging methodologies to enhance healthcare provision in veterinary sciences (Nayeri et al. 2019). Furthermore, traditional statistical methods focus on inferences and are based on setting a hypothesis that might be accepted/rejected depending on how it fits with the measured data. However, ML methods are hypothesis‐free and do not require a specific data distribution to make a prediction (Valletta et al. 2017).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Relative frequency (%) of algorithm utilization across reviewed articles.

In the domain of clinical practice, CNNs predominated, constituting 18.48% of the utilized algorithms. Following closely were SVM and ANN, each accounting for 8.7% of usage. RF and DT algorithms also featured prominently. Similarly, in the administration category, both SVM and RF algorithms held equal prominence, each accounting for 20.59% of utilization. This trend persisted across the remaining categories, with SVM emerging as the predominant choice in biomedical research (16.67%), while RF algorithms dominated studies about public health (50%).

4.3. Integration of Traditional Statistical Methods and Advanced ML Techniques

A comprehensive examination of studies reveals that traditional statistical methodologies like linear regression and logistic regression coexist alongside sophisticated deep learning architectures such as CNNs and RNNs. Notably, ANNs, particularly multi‐layer perceptrons (MLPs), emerge as prevalent choices, highlighting their adaptability in managing intricate veterinary datasets. The adoption of deep learning techniques, notably CNNs and long short‐term memory (LSTM) networks, represents a paradigm shift toward exploiting the capabilities of neural networks for tasks such as image recognition and sequential data analysis. Ensemble methods like RF, gradient boosting machines (GBM), and adaboost witness widespread acceptance, underscoring the efficacy of amalgamating multiple models to augment predictive performance. Furthermore, the integration of text mining and NLP techniques underscores a growing inclination toward analyzing textual data, potentially sourced from electronic health records or research literature. The amalgamation of expert systems with ML methodologies indicates a hybrid approach aimed at leveraging domain expertise for decision support and diagnostic endeavours.

4.4. Emerging Trends and Future Directions

Emerging techniques such as SincNet signify ongoing exploration of innovative methodologies in veterinary research. Additionally, references to automated ML and ensemble methods signify a trend towards model stacking and automated model selection processes, indicative of a pursuit for optimized model efficacy.

While traditional statistical methods such as linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and ordinary least squares (OLS) persist in certain contexts, SVM and RF consistently emerge as favoured choices across various veterinary studies, affirming their resilience and adaptability. In conclusion, the evolving landscape of ML applications in veterinary medicine illustrates a dynamic interaction between traditional statistical methodologies and cutting‐edge deep learning techniques, driven by a quest for enhanced healthcare provision and patient outcomes.

It is imperative to underscore that while grasping trends within this domain can offer researchers a broad perspective, the selection of an appropriate algorithm for a project should be predicated on its unique set of criteria including problem type and data quality. In veterinary science, it is crucial to select appropriate metrics and compare results across different ML techniques and traditional methods. This ensures accurate predictive outcomes and enhances decision‐making processes. Studies suggest employing multiple ML algorithms to evaluate predictive performance effectively. Additionally, comparisons with traditional approaches provide valuable insights into the suitability of ML methodologies (Nayeri et al. 2019).

5. Challenges and Opportunities

While AI holds great promise for revolutionizing veterinary sciences by enhancing diagnostic methods, treatment planning, and patient care, its integration is not without challenges. Addressing ethical, data, and practical considerations is paramount to realizing the full potential of AI in advancing animal health outcomes while upholding the principles of medical ethics and professional responsibility (Appleby and Basran 2022). In this segment, the referenced subjects will be succinctly examined. Additionally, elucidations regarding forthcoming prospects will be provided.

5.1. Ethical Considerations

Ethical principles, such as transparency, accountability, privacy, and fairness, which are foundational to AI development in various domains, find resonance in veterinary AI as well (Jobin et al. 2019). Veterinarians, akin to their counterparts in human medicine, must navigate complex ethical terrain, balancing the principles of nonmaleficence, beneficence, respect for autonomy, and justice. While the principles themselves are applicable, the context of veterinary practice introduces unique challenges, such as the financial dynamics of animal healthcare, which can impact decisions regarding diagnostics and treatment. Additionally, the absence of autonomous consent from animal patients parallels ethical considerations found in paediatric medicine, highlighting the importance of a patient‐centric approach (Coghlan and Quinn 2023).

5.2. Data Challenges

The integration of AI into veterinary medicine faces significant data challenges, including the inherent complexity and heterogeneity of biomedical datasets. Biomedical data, characterized by high dimensionality, sparsity, incompleteness, and bias, pose formidable obstacles to the development of meaningful AI applications (Zitnik et al. 2019). Addressing these challenges requires innovative approaches to data integration, leveraging diverse sources of information beyond traditional datasets (Smiti 2020). Furthermore, the dynamic nature of biomedical outcomes necessitates adaptive ML methods capable of capturing temporal changes and evolving trends, particularly in areas like cancer treatment where rapid evolution occurs (Zitnik et al. 2019).

5.3. Practical Considerations

Practical considerations, including the identification of suitable use cases, ensuring data quality and ownership, promoting open data initiatives, and establishing ethical and regulatory frameworks, are essential for the successful implementation of AI in veterinary practice. Veterinarians play a pivotal role in determining the strategic deployment of AI technologies, safeguarding data integrity, and advocating for transparent and ethical practices. Moreover, the adoption of AI requires careful consideration of client acceptance and education, recognizing the potential impact on the veterinarian–client relationship and the overall delivery of care (Appleby and Basran 2022).

5.4. Opportunities

Opportunities abound in the integration of AI within veterinary sciences (Appleby and Basran 2022). AI technologies promise enhanced diagnostics and treatment planning, leading to more precise interventions and improved patient outcomes. Moreover, these advancements facilitate efficient resource allocation, optimizing practice operations and financial sustainability. AI‐driven analytics also accelerate research efforts, fostering innovations in disease understanding, drug discovery, and therapeutic interventions. Additionally, AI‐enabled telemedicine platforms extend veterinary care to remote areas, offering expert consultation and remote monitoring services. These opportunities underscore the transformative potential of AI in veterinary sciences, promising advancements in clinical practice, biomedical research, and healthcare delivery.

6. Conclusion

The application of AI in veterinary sciences is extensive, spanning multiple branches. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of AI's primary application areas in veterinary sciences, based on a thorough review of relevant literature. The reviewed articles were classified into four main domains: clinical practice, biomedical research, public health, and administration. Notably, clinical practice and administration were the most extensively researched categories, followed by biomedical research and public health. This distribution highlights the significant focus on clinical practice and administration, suggesting promising advancements in these areas. Additionally, within each category, subcategories were identified, revealing distinct patterns. AI applications in veterinary sciences primarily concentrate on early disease warning systems (EWSs), especially for small animals, with a subsequent emphasis on imaging techniques and farm management. However, it is important to consider emerging fields such as sports medicine, animal welfare, and clinic management, which are expected to attract increased scholarly interest in the future. Furthermore, the growing use of AI in public health holds significant promise for veterinary sciences, paralleling advancements in medical sciences. Biomedical research in the veterinary field encompasses a wide range of topics that require dedicated examination, although only briefly mentioned here. Our detailed analysis of AI algorithms used in the reviewed studies indicates a preference for more complex algorithms, particularly those based on deep learning methodologies, reflecting evolving research trends. It is essential to recognize the importance of data types and the associated algorithmic challenges. In conclusion, the integration of AI in veterinary sciences is expected to continue evolving, with prospects for not only product‐centric innovations in clinical practice but also new explorations into emerging and previously uncharted areas within the field.

Author Contributions

H.A. reviewed the article and revised it for scientific accuracy and writing quality. M.H.T. contributed to the writing of the manuscript, with a particular focus on the applications. M.M. assisted in the revision of the article. P.S. was involved in the study design, collection of sources, writing of the article, and the design of tables and figures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Peer Review

The peer review history for this article is available at https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer‐review/10.1002/vms3.70315.

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Ahmad, M. , Abdallah S. A., and Abdallah A. M.. 2023. “Student Perspectives on the Integration of Artificial Intelligence Into Healthcare Services.” Digital Health 9: 20552076231174095. 10.1177/20552076231174095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akinsulie, O. C. 2024. “The Potential Application of Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Clinical Practice and Biomedical Research.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science 11: 1347550. 10.3389/fvets.2024.1347550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Albadrani, B. 2024. “Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Care: A Review of Applications for Animal Health.” Egyptian Journal of Veterinary Sciences 55, no. 6: 1725–1736. 10.21608/ejvs.2024.260989.1769. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexeenko, V. , Fraser J. A., Bowen M., Huang C. L. H., Marr C. M., and Jeevaratnam K.. 2020. “The Complexity of Clinically‐Normal Sinus‐Rhythm ECGs Is Decreased in Equine Athletes With a Diagnosis of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.” Scientific Reports 10, no. 1: 6822. 10.1038/s41598-020-63343-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ali, O. , Abdelbaki W., Shrestha A., Elbasi E., Alryalat M. A. A., and Dwivedi Y. K.. 2023. “A Systematic Literature Review of Artificial Intelligence in the Healthcare Sector: Benefits, Challenges, Methodologies, and Functionalities.” Journal of Innovation and Knowledge 8, no. 1: 100333. 10.1016/j.jik.2023.100333. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Alnasser, B. 2023. “A Review of Literature on the Economic Implications of Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.” E‐Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks 12, no. 03: 35–48. 10.4236/etsn.2023.123003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Amiroch, S. , Irawan M. I., Mukhlash I., Al Faroby M. H. Z., and Nidom C. A.. 2022. “Machine Learning for the Prediction of Antiviral Compounds Targeting Avian Influenza A/H9N2 Viral Proteins.” Symmetry 14, no. 6: 1114. 10.3390/sym14061114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Andersen, P. H. , Gleerup K. B., Wathan J., et al. 2018. “Can a Machine Learn to See Horse Pain? An Interdisciplinary Approach towards Automated Decoding of Facial Expressions of Pain in the Horse.” https://www.academia.edu/89294147/Can_a_Machine_Learn_to_See_Horse_Pain_An_Interdisciplinary_Approach_Towards_Automated_Decoding_of_Facial_Expressions_of_Pain_in_the_Horse. [Google Scholar]
  9. Andrei, R. 2023. “Investigating the Performance of Deep Learning Algorithms for Muscle Activation on/off‐Set Detection in Horse Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Data.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of 39th Twente Student Conference on IT, July 7, 2023, (Vol. 1). [Google Scholar]
  10. Appleby, R. B. , and Basran P. S.. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Medicine.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 260, no. 8: 819–824. 10.2460/javma.22.03.0093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Awaysheh, A. , Wilcke J., Elvinger F., Rees L., Fan W., and Zimmerman K. L.. 2016. “Evaluation of Supervised Machine‐Learning Algorithms to Distinguish Between Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Alimentary Lymphoma in Cats.” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 28, no. 6: 679–687. 10.1177/1040638716657377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bangsgaard, E. O. , Andersen V. D., Græsbøll K., and Christiansen L. E.. 2023. “The ALEX Algorithm—Estimating Average Lifetime Antimicrobial Exposure of Danish Slaughter Pigs in a Fast, Automated and Robust Way.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 212: 105829. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Banzato, T. , Bernardini M., Cherubini G. B., and Zotti A.. 2018. “A Methodological Approach for Deep Learning to Distinguish Between Meningiomas and Gliomas on Canine MR‐Images.” BMC Veterinary Research 14, no. 1: 317. 10.1186/s12917-018-1638-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Banzato, T. , Wodzinski M., Tauceri F., et al. 2021. “An AI‐Based Algorithm for the Automatic Classification of Thoracic Radiographs in Cats.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8: 731936. 10.3389/fvets.2021.731936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Basran, P. S. 2024. “What's in the Box? A Toolbox for Safe Deployment of Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Medicine.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 262, no. 8: 1090–1098. 10.2460/javma.24.01.0027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Basran, P. S. , Gao J., Palmer S., and Reesink H. L.. 2021. “A Radiomics Platform for Computing Imaging Features From µCT Images of Thoroughbred Racehorse Proximal Sesamoid Bones: Benchmark Performance and Evaluation.” Equine Veterinary Journal 53, no. 2: 277–286. 10.1111/evj.13321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ben‐Gal, H. C. 2023. “Artificial Intelligence (AI) Acceptance in Primary Care During the Coronavirus Pandemic: What Is the Role of Patients' Gender, Age and Health Awareness? A Two‐Phase Pilot Study.” Frontiers in Public Health 10: 931225. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.931225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bhatia, M. , Ahanger T. A., Tariq U., and Ibrahim A.. 2021. “Cognitive Intelligence in Fog Computing‐inspired Veterinary Healthcare.” Computers and Electrical Engineering 91: 107061. 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Biercher, A. , Meller S., Wendt J., et al. 2021. “Using Deep Learning to Detect Spinal Cord Diseases on Thoracolumbar Magnetic Resonance Images of Dogs.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8: 721167. 10.3389/fvets.2021.721167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Biourge, V. , Delmotte S., Feugier A., Bradley R., McAllister M., and Elliott J.. 2020. “An Artificial Neural Network‐Based Model to Predict Chronic Kidney Disease in Aged Cats.” Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 34, no. 5: 1920–1931. 10.1111/jvim.15892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bollig, N. , Clarke L., Elsmo E., and Craven M.. 2020. “Machine Learning for Syndromic Surveillance Using Veterinary Necropsy Reports.” PLoS ONE 15, no. 2: e0228105. 10.1371/journal.pone.0228105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bollig, N. , Deboer D., and Döpfer D.. (n.d.). “A Machine Learning Tutorial for Veterinarians: Examples Using Canine Atopic Dermatitis.” https://docslib.org/doc/6779573/machine‐learning‐tutorial‐for‐veterinarians‐examples‐using‐canine‐atopic‐dermatitis‐nathan‐bollig‐dvm. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bonicelli, L. , Trachtman A. R., Rosamilia A., et al. 2021. “Training Convolutional Neural Networks to Score Pneumonia in Slaughtered Pigs.” Animals 11, no. 11: 3290. 10.3390/ani11113290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Borchers, M. R. , Chang Y. M., Proudfoot K. L., Wadsworth B. A., Stone A. E., and Bewley J. M.. 2017. “Machine‐Learning‐Based Calving Prediction From Activity, Lying, and Ruminating Behaviors in Dairy Cattle.” Journal of Dairy Science 100, no. 7: 5664–5674. 10.3168/jds.2016-11526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Bortoluzzi, E. M. , Schmidt P. H., Brown R. E., et al. 2023. “Image Classification and Automated Machine Learning to Classify Lung Pathologies in Deceased Feedlot Cattle.” Veterinary Sciences 10, no. 2: 113. 10.3390/vetsci10020113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bouchemla, F. , Akchurin S. V., Akchurina I. V., Dyulger G. P., Latynina E. S., and Grecheneva A. V.. 2023. “Artificial Intelligence Feasibility in Veterinary Medicine: A Systematic Review.” Veterinary World 16, no. 10: 2143–2149. 10.14202/vetworld.2023.2143-2149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Bradley, R. , Tagkopoulos I., Kim M., et al. 2019. “Predicting Early Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease in Cats Using Routine Clinical Laboratory Tests and Machine Learning.” Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 33, no. 6: 2644–2656. 10.1111/jvim.15623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Bravo Sanchez, F. J. , Hossain M. R., English N. B., and Moore S. T.. 2021. “Bioacoustic Classification of Avian Calls From Raw Sound Waveforms With an Open‐Source Deep Learning Architecture.” Scientific Reports 11, no. 1: 15733. 10.1038/s41598-021-95076-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Brezov, D. , Hristov H., Dimov D., and Alexiev K.. 2023. “Predicting the Rectal Temperature of Dairy Cows Using Infrared Thermography and Multimodal Machine Learning.” Applied Sciences 13, no. 20: 11416. 10.3390/app132011416. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Brock, J. , Lange M., Tratalos J. A., et al. 2021. “Combining Expert Knowledge and Machine‐Learning to Classify Herd Types in Livestock Systems.” Scientific Reports 11, no. 1: 2989. 10.1038/s41598-021-82373-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Broomé, S. , Gleerup K. B., Andersen P. H., and Kjellström H.. (2019). “Dynamics Are Important for the Recognition of Equine Pain in Video.” Paper presented at 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA. [Google Scholar]
  32. Campanholi, S. P. , Garcia Neto S., Pinheiro G. M., et al. 2023. “Can in Vitro Embryo Production Be Estimated From Semen Variables in Senepol Breed by Using Artificial Intelligence?” Frontiers in Veterinary Science 10: 1254940. 10.3389/fvets.2023.1254940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Celniak, W. , Wodziński M., Jurgas A., et al. 2023. “Improving the Classification of Veterinary Thoracic Radiographs Through Inter‐Species and Inter‐Pathology Self‐Supervised Pre‐Training of Deep Learning Models.” Scientific Reports 13, no. 1: 19518. 10.1038/s41598-023-46345-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Chartrand, G. , Cheng P. M., Vorontsov E., et al. 2017. “Deep Learning: A Primer for Radiologists.” Radiographics 37, no. 7: 2113–2131. 10.1148/rg.2017170077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Cheok, A. , Cai J., and Yan Y.. 2023. “Deciphering Avian Emotions: A Novel AI and Machine Learning Approach to Understanding Chicken Vocalizations.” 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3034567/v1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Chomyn, O. , Wapenaar W., Richens I. F., et al. 2023. “Assessment of a Joint Farmer‐Veterinarian Discussion About Biosecurity Using Novel Social Interaction Analyses.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 212: 105831. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Cihan, P. , Gökçe E., Atakişi O., Kirmizigül A. H., and Erdoğan H. M.. 2021. “Prediction of Immunoglobulin G in Lambs With Artificial Intelligence Methods.” Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi 27, no. 1: 21–27. 10.9775/kvfd.2020.24642. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Cihan, P. , Gökçe E., and Kalipsiz O.. 2019. “A Review on Determination of Computer Aid Diagnosis and/or Risk Factors Using Data Mining Methods in Veterinary Field.” Ataturk Universitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi 14, no. 2: 209–220. 10.17094/ataunivbd.462197. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Coghlan, S. , and Quinn T.. 2023. “Ethics of Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Veterinary Medicine.” AI and Society 39: 2337–2348. 10.1007/s00146-023-01686-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Da Silva, C. , Gaia R., Riggs C., Kong H., and Club J.. (2022). “Equine Radiograph Classification Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.” 10.48550/arXiv.2204.13857. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Darbandi, H. , Bragança F. S., Van der Zwaag B. J., et al. 2021. “Using Different Combinations of Body‐Mounted IMU Sensors to Estimate Speed of Horses—A Machine Learning Approach.” Sensors 21, no. 3: 1–12. 10.3390/s21030798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. de Barros, A. d M. C., Silva A. F. R., et al. 2021. “Equine Simplified Acute Physiology Score: Personalised Medicine for the Equine Emergency Patient.” Veterinary Record 189, no. 5: e136. 10.1002/vetr.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. De Waele, T. , Shahid A., Peralta D., et al. 2023. “Time‐Series‐Based Feature Selection and Clustering for Equine Activity Recognition Using Accelerometers.” IEEE Sensors Journal 23, no. 11: 11855–11868. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3265811. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Donnelly, C. G. 2022. The Pioneer 100 Horse Health Project: A Systems Biology Approach to Equine Precision Health Research UC Davis. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8n20f2h8. [Google Scholar]
  45. Donnelly, C. G. , Johnson A. L., Reed S., and Finno C. J.. 2023. “Cerebrospinal Fluid and Serum Proteomic Profiles Accurately Distinguish Neuroaxonal Dystrophy From Cervical Vertebral Compressive Myelopathy in Horses.” Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 37, no. 2: 689–696. 10.1111/jvim.16660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Dórea, F. C. , Muckle C. A., Kelton D., et al. 2013. “Exploratory Analysis of Methods for Automated Classification of Laboratory Test Orders Into Syndromic Groups in Veterinary Medicine.” PLoS ONE 8, no. 3: e57334. 10.1371/journal.pone.0057334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Dos Santos Martins, T. G. , Schor P., Stuchi J. A., and Fowler S. B.. 2022. “New Direct and Indirect Ophthalmoscopy Teaching Methodology for Veterinary Doctors.” Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 49, no. 2: 204–209. 10.3138/JVME-2020-0089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Dumortier, L. , Guépin F., Delignette‐Muller M. L., Boulocher C., and Grenier T.. 2022. “Deep Learning in Veterinary Medicine, an Approach Based on CNN to Detect Pulmonary Abnormalities From Lateral Thoracic Radiographs in Cats.” Scientific Reports 12, no. 1: 11418. 10.1038/s41598-022-14993-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Endo, Y. 2024. “Application of Artificial Intelligence to Hepatobiliary Cancer Clinical Outcomes Research.” Artificial Intelligence Surgery 4, no. 2: 59–67. 10.20517/ais.2024.09. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Erika, C. , Susanna S. L., Tonny A., Karl S., and Klara F.. 2023. “Co‐created Community Contracts Support Biosecurity Changes in a Region Where African Swine Fever Is Endemic—Part I: The Methodology.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 212: 105840. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Ezanno, P. , Picault S., Beaunée G., et al. 2021. “Research Perspectives on Animal Health in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.” Veterinary Research 52, no. 1: 40. 10.1186/s13567-021-00902-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Fitzke, M. , Stack C., Dourson A., et al. 2021. RapidRead: Global Deployment of State‐of‐the‐Art Radiology AI for a Large Veterinary Teleradiology Practice. http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.08165. [Google Scholar]
  53. Fitzke, M. , Whitley D., Yau W., et al. 2021. OncoPetNet: A Deep Learning Based AI System for Mitotic Figure Counting on H&E Stained Whole Slide Digital Images in a Large Veterinary Diagnostic Lab Setting. http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07856. [Google Scholar]
  54. Fjelland, R. 2020. “Why General Artificial Intelligence Will Not Be Realized.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7, no. 1: 10. 10.1057/s41599-020-0494-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Fraiwan, M. A. , and Abutarbush S. M.. 2020. “Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict Survivability Likelihood and Need for Surgery in Horses Presented With Acute Abdomen (Colic).” Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 90: 102973. 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Fuentes, S. , Gonzalez Viejo C., Tongson E., Dunshea F. R., Dac H. H., and Lipovetzky N.. 2022. “Animal Biometric Assessment Using Non‐invasive Computer Vision and Machine Learning Are Good Predictors of Dairy Cows Age and Welfare: The Future of Automated Veterinary Support Systems.” Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 10: 100388. 10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100388. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Fuentes, S. , Viejo C. G., Cullen B., Tongson E., Chauhan S. S., and Dunshea F. R.. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence Applied to a Robotic Dairy Farm to Model Milk Productivity and Quality Based on Cow Data and Daily Environmental Parameters.” Sensors 20, no. 10: 2975. 10.3390/s20102975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Furrer, L. , Küker S., Berezowski J., Posthaus H., Vial F., and Rinaldi F.. 2015. “Constructing a Syndromic Terminology Resource for Veterinary Text Mining.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Terminology and Artificial Intelligence, Granada, Spain. 10.5167/uzh-114496. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Gabriel, R. V. C. 2023. “Risk Factors and Determinants of Poisoning by Ivermectin and Deltamethrin in Routine of Small Animal Medical Clinics.” Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences 5: 41–45. 10.31080/asvs.2023.05.0784. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Gao, H. , Jiang G., Gao X., Xiao J., and Wang H.. 2019. “An Equine Disease Diagnosis Expert System Based on Improved Reasoning of Evidence Credibility.” Information Processing in Agriculture 6, no. 3: 414–423. 10.1016/j.inpa.2018.11.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Gouda, H. F. , Hassan F. A. M., El‐Araby E. E., and Moawed S. A.. 2022. “Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Bluetongue Risk Prediction: A Seroprevalence Study on Small Ruminants.” BMC Veterinary Research 18, no. 1: 394. 10.1186/s12917-022-03486-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Gulyaeva, M. , Huettmann F., Shestopalov A., et al. 2020. “Data Mining and Model‐Predicting a Global Disease Reservoir for Low‐Pathogenic Avian Influenza (A) in the Wider Pacific Rim Using Big Data Sets.” Scientific Reports 10, no. 1: 16817. 10.1038/s41598-020-73664-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Gupta, S. , Kuehn L. A., and Clawson M. L.. 2023. “Early Detection of Infectious Bovine Keratoconjunctivitis With Artificial Intelligence.” Veterinary Research 54, no. 1: 122. 10.1186/s13567-023-01255-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Hamadani, A. , Ganai N. A., Alam S., et al. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence Techniques for the Prediction of Body Weights in Sheep.” Indian Journal of Animal Research 58, no. 5: 884–889. 10.18805/ijar.b-4831. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Haselzadeh, F. 2021. E‐Nose Equipped With Artificial Intelligence Technology for Diagnosis of Dairy Cattle Disease in Veterinary. Kth School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. [Google Scholar]
  66. Hawkins, W. D. , and DuRant S. E.. 2020. “Applications of Machine Learning in Behavioral Ecology: Quantifying Avian Incubation Behavior and Nest Conditions in Relation to Environmental Temperature.” PLoS ONE 15, no. 8: e0236925. 10.1371/journal.pone.0236925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Hennessey, E. , DiFazio M. R., Hennessey R., and Cassel N.. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging: A Literature Review.” Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 63, no. S1: 851–870. 10.1111/vru.13163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Herrick, K. A. , Huettmann F., and Lindgren M. A.. 2013. “A Global Model of Avian Influenza Prediction in Wild Birds: The Importance of Northern Regions.” Veterinary Research 44: 42. 10.1186/1297-9716-44-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Hooper, S. E. , Hecker K. G., and Artemiou E.. 2023. “Using Machine Learning in Veterinary Medical Education: An Introduction for Veterinary Medicine Educators.” Veterinary Sciences 10, no. 9: 537. 10.3390/vetsci10090537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Hu, J. , Lv S., Zhou T., et al. 2023. “Identification of Pulmonary Hypertension Animal Models Using a New Evolutionary Machine Learning Framework Based on Blood Routine Indicators.” Journal of Bionic Engineering 20, no. 2: 762–781. 10.1007/s42235-022-00292-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Huang, Y. H. , Alexeenko V., Tse G., Huang C. L. H., Marr C. M., and Jeevaratnam K.. 2021. “ECG Restitution Analysis and Machine Learning to Detect Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Insight From the Equine Athlete as a Model for Human Athletes.” Function 2, no. 1: zqaa031. 10.1093/function/zqaa031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Huang, Y. H. , Lyle J. V., Ab Razak A. S., et al. 2022. “Detecting Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation From Normal Sinus Rhythm in Equine Athletes Using Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction and Machine Learning.” Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal 3, no. 2: 96–106. 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Huma, Z. E. , and Iqbal F.. 2019. “Predicting the Body Weight of Balochi Sheep Using a Machine Learning Approach.” Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 43, no. 4: 500–506. 10.3906/vet-1812-23. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Humayun, F. , Khan F., Fawad N., et al. 2021. “Computational Method for Classification of Avian Influenza A Virus Using DNA Sequence Information and Physicochemical Properties.” Frontiers in Genetics 12: 599321. 10.3389/fgene.2021.599321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Hunter, L. B. , Baten A., Haskell M. J., et al. 2021. “Machine Learning Prediction of Sleep Stages in Dairy Cows From Heart Rate and Muscle Activity Measures.” Scientific Reports 11, no. 1: 10938. 10.1038/s41598-021-90416-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Hyde, R. M. , Down P. M., Bradley A. J., et al. 2020. “Automated Prediction of Mastitis Infection Patterns in Dairy Herds Using Machine Learning.” Scientific Reports 10, no. 1: 4289. 10.1038/s41598-020-61126-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Innocente, G. , Patuzzi I., Furlanello T., et al. 2022. “Machine Learning and Canine Chronic Enteropathies: A New Approach to Investigate FMT Effects.” Veterinary Sciences 9, no. 9: 502. 10.3390/vetsci9090502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Iqbal, N. , Jamil F., Ahmad S., and Kim D.. 2021. “A Novel Blockchain‐Based Integrity and Reliable Veterinary Clinic Information Management System Using Predictive Analytics for Provisioning of Quality Health Services.” IEEE Access 9: 8069–8098. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3049325. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Ismail, A. F. , Sam M. F. M., Bakar K. A., Ahamat A., Adam S., and Qureshi M. I.. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Business Ecosystem.” International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering 18, no. 09: 100–114. 10.3991/ijoe.v18i09.32251. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Jacob, N. , Kumar B. A. A. S., and Padodara R. J.. 2022. “A Glimpse into Artificial Intelligence in Animal Physiology and Allied Sciences.” Animal Reproduction Update 2, no. 1: 72–81. 10.48165/aru.2022.2104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Jiang, F. , Jiang Y., Zhi H., et al. 2017. “Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Past, Present and Future.” Stroke and Vascular Neurology 2, no. 4: 230–243. 10.1136/svn-2017-000101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Jiang, R. , Shen J., Li X., Gao R., Zhao Q., and Su Z.. 2022. “Detection and Recognition of Veterinary Drug Residues in Beef Using Hyperspectral Discrete Wavelet Transform and Deep Learning.” International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 15, no. 1: 224–232. 10.25165/j.ijabe.20221501.6459. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Jobin, A. , Ienca M., and Vayena E.. 2019. “The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines.” Nature Machine Intelligence 1, no. 9: 389–399. 10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Joslyn, S. , and Alexander K.. 2022. “Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Use in Veterinary Radiology.” Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 63, no. S1: 871–879. 10.1111/vru.13159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Jungwirth, D. , and Haluza D.. 2023. “Feasibility Study on Utilization of the Artificial Intelligence GPT‐3 in Public Health.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20: 4541. 10.20944/preprints202301.0521.v1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Kahl, S. , Wood C. M., Eibl M., and Klinck H.. 2021. “BirdNET: A Deep Learning Solution for Avian Diversity Monitoring.” Ecological Informatics 61: 101236. 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101236. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Kaler, J. , Mitsch J., Vázquez‐Diosdado J. A., Bollard N., Dottorini T., and Ellis K. A.. 2020. “Automated Detection of Lameness in Sheep Using Machine Learning Approaches: Novel Insights Into Behavioural Differences Among Lame and Non‐Lame Sheep.” Royal Society Open Science 7, no. 1: 190824. 10.1098/rsos.190824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Kaul, V. , Enslin S., and Gross S. A.. 2020. “History of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 92, no. 4: 807–812. 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Kennedy, U. , Paterson M., and Clark N.. 2023. “Using a Gradient Boosted Model for Case Ascertainment From Free‐Text Veterinary Records.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 212: 105850. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Khan, A. U. , Melzer F., Hendam A., et al. 2020. “Seroprevalence and Molecular Identification of Brucella spp. in Bovines in Pakistan—Investigating Association with Risk Factors Using Machine Learning.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science 7: 594498. 10.3389/fvets.2020.594498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Kim, E. , Fischetti A. J., Sreetharan P. S., Weltman J. G., and Fox P. R.. 2022. “Comparison of Artificial Intelligence to the Veterinary Radiologist's Diagnosis of Canine Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema.” Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 63, no. 3: 292–297. 10.1111/vru.13062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. King, D. , Miller Z., Jones W., and Hu W.. 2010. “Characteristic Sites in the Internal Proteins of Avian and Human Influenza Viruses.” Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering 03, no. 10: 943–955. 10.4236/jbise.2010.310125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Koo, J. , Choi K., Lee P., et al. 2021. “Predicting Dynamic Clinical Outcomes of the Chemotherapy for Canine Lymphoma Patients Using a Machine Learning Model.” Veterinary Sciences 8, no. 12: 301. 10.3390/vetsci8120301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Kumar, M. , and Mittapalli R.. 2020. “Assessing Livestock Disease in Animals Using a Machine Learning Algorithm.” International Journal of Computing, Programming and Database Management 1, no. 2: 29–31. 10.33545/27076636.2020.v1.i2a.14. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  95. Kushnir, В. І. , Kushnir I. M., Patereha I. P., Kutsan O. T., Zhovnir O. M., and Gutyj B. V.. 2022. “Comparative Assessment of Various Methods of Studying the Skin Toxicity of a Wound‐Healing Drug.” Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences 5, no. 2: 3–7. 10.32718/ujvas5-2.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  96. Laustsen, A. H. , Greiff V., Karatt‐Vellatt A., Muyldermans S., and Jenkins T. P.. 2021. “Animal Immunization, in Vitro Display Technologies, and Machine Learning for Antibody Discovery.” Trends in Biotechnology 39, no. 12: 1263–1273. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Lekadir, K. , Quaglio G., Tselioudis Garmendia A., and Gallin C.. 2022. Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Applications, Risks, and Ethical and Societal Impacts. 10.2861/568473. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  98. Lencioni, G. C. , de Sousa R. V., de Souza Sardinha E. J., Corrêa R. R., and Zanella A. J.. 2021. “Pain Assessment in Horses Using Automatic Facial Expression Recognition Through Deep Learning‐based Modeling.” PLoS ONE 16, no. 10: e0258672. 10.1371/journal.pone.0258672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Li, H. , Chen Y., Machalaba C., et al. 2021. “Wild Animal and Zoonotic Disease Risk Management and Regulation in China: Examining Gaps and One Health Opportunities in Scope, Mandates, and Monitoring Systems.” One Health 13: 100301. 10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Li, S. , Wang Z., Visser L. C., Wisner E. R., and Cheng H.. 2020. “Pilot Study: Application of Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Left Atrial Enlargement on Canine Thoracic Radiographs.” Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 61, no. 6: 611–618. 10.1111/vru.12901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Liu, Y. , Zhang L., and Zhou Y.. 2014. “Comparative Analysis of H1N1 Avian Influenza Virus by Multiple Sequence Alignment and Support Vector Machine.” Journal of Gene Therapy 2, no. 1: 4. https://www.avensonline.org/fulltextarticles/JGT‐2381‐3326‐01‐0003.html. [Google Scholar]
  102. Lustgarten, J. L. , Zehnder A., Shipman L. W., Gancher E., and Webb T. L.. 2020. “Veterinary Informatics: Forging the Future Between Veterinary Medicine, Human Medicine, and One Health Initiatives—A Joint Paper by the Association for Veterinary Informatics (AVI) and the CTSA One Health Alliance (COHA).” JAMIA Open 3, no. 2: 306–317. 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Madli, F. 2024. “Artificial Intelligence and Public Health Context: What We Should Know?” Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology 39, no. 2: 96–109. 10.37934/araset.39.2.96109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  104. Mao, A. , Huang E., Gan H., Parkes R. S. V., Xu W., and Liu K.. 2021. “Cross‐Modality Interaction Network for Equine Activity Recognition Using Imbalanced Multi‐Modal Data.” Sensors 21, no. 17: 5818. 10.3390/s21175818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Martyshuk, T. V. , Gutyj B. V., Vyshchur O., et al. 2022. “Study of Acute and Chronic Toxicity of “Butaselmevit” on Laboratory Animals.” Archives of Pharmacy Practice 13, no. 3: 70–75. 10.51847/xhwvcyfbz3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  106. Mathis, M. W. , and Mathis A.. 2020. “Deep Learning Tools for the Measurement of Animal Behavior in Neuroscience.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 60: 1–11. 10.1016/j.conb.2019.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. May, A. , Gesell‐May S., Müller T., and Ertel W.. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence as a Tool to Aid in the Differentiation of Equine Ophthalmic Diseases With an Emphasis on Equine Uveitis.” Equine Veterinary Journal 54, no. 5: 847–855. 10.1111/evj.13528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. McConnell, I. 2012. “Comparative Medicine—With Some Thoughts About the Integration of Medical and Veterinary Education.” IJPH 9, no. 2. 10.2427/6339. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  109. Mcevoy, F. J. , and Amigo J. M.. 2013. “Using Machine Learning to Classify Image Features From Canine Pelvic Radiographs: Evaluation of Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis and Artificial Neural Network Models.” Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 54, no. 2: 122–126. 10.1111/vru.12003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Miller, M. , Byfield R., Crosby M., Lin J., and Li T.. 2023. “Networked Wearable Sensors for Monitoring Health and Activities of an Equine Herd: An IoT Approach to Improve Horse Welfare.” 10.36227/techrxiv.24216420.v1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  111. Milosevic, B. , Ciric S., Lalic N., et al. 2019. “Machine Learning Application in Growth and Health Prediction of Broiler Chickens.” World's Poultry Science Journal 75, no. 3: 401–410. 10.1017/s0043933919000254. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  112. Min, P.‐K. 2024. “The Evolving Landscape of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Animal Health.” Indian Journal of Animal Research 58, no. 10: 1793–1798. 10.18805/ijar.bf-1742. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  113. Mittapalli, M. K. R. 2020. “Assessing Livestock Disease in Animals Using a Machine Learning Algorithm.” International Journal of Computing, Programming and Database Management 1, no. 2: 29–31. 10.33545/27076636.2020.v1.i2a.14. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  114. Mokaram Ghotoorlar, S. , Mehdi Ghamsari S., Nowrouzian I., and Shiry Ghidary S.. 2012. “Lameness Scoring System for Dairy Cows Using Force Plates and Artificial Intelligence.” Veterinary Record 170, no. 5: 126. 10.1136/vr.100429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Morisi, A. , Rai T., Bacon N. J., et al. 2023. “Detection of Necrosis in Digitised Whole‐Slide Images for Better Grading of Canine Soft‐Tissue Sarcomas Using Machine‐Learning.” Veterinary Sciences 10, no. 1: 45. 10.3390/vetsci10010045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Nayeri, S. , Sargolzaei M., and Tulpan D.. 2019. “A Review of Traditional and Machine Learning Methods Applied to Animal Breeding.” Animal Health Research Reviews 20, no. 1: 31–46. 10.1017/S1466252319000148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Niu, L. , Yang C., Du Y., Qin L., and Li B.. (2020). “Cattle Disease Auxiliary Diagnosis and Treatment System Based on Data Analysis and Mining.” Paper presented at the 2020 5th International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS), Shanghai, China. 10.1109/ICCCS49078.2020.9118590. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  118. Olstad, K. , Gangsei L. E., and Kongsro J.. 2022. “A Method for Labelling Lesions for Machine Learning and some New Observations on Osteochondrosis in Computed Tomographic Scans of Four Pig Joints.” BMC Veterinary Research 18, no. 1: 328. 10.1186/s12917-022-03426-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Oren, A. , Türkcü J. D., Meller S., et al. 2023. “BrachySound: Machine Learning Based Assessment of respiratory Sounds in Dogs.” Scientific Reports 13, no. 1: 20300. 10.1038/s41598-023-47308-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Pandey, S. , Kalwa U., Kong T., et al. 2021. “Behavioral Monitoring Tool for Pig Farmers: Ear Tag Sensors, Machine Intelligence, and Technology Adoption Roadmap.” Animals 11, no. 9: 2665. 10.3390/ani11092665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Pereira, A. I. , Franco‐Gonçalo P., Leite P., et al. 2023. “Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Imaging: An Overview.” Veterinary Sciences 10, no. 5: 320. 10.3390/vetsci10050320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Shriya, P. 2024. “Impact of Implementing AI in Medical Field.” Interantional Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management 08, no. 03: 1–5. 10.55041/ijsrem29760. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  123. Qiang, X. , and Kou Z.. 2019. “Scoring Amino Acid Mutation to Predict Pandemic Risk of Avian Influenza Virus.” BMC Bioinformatics 20: 288. 10.1186/s12859-019-2770-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Qiu, Q. , Cao S., and Sun W.. 2021. “Precision Pre‐Control System Based on Veterinary Drug Warehouse Environment.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of 2021 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Computer Applications, ICPECA 2021. Shenyang, China. 10.1109/ICPECA51329.2021.9362545. [DOI]
  125. Raes, A. , Athanasiou G., Azari‐Dolatabad N., et al. 2024. “Manual Versus Deep Learning Measurements to Evaluate Cumulus Expansion of Bovine Oocytes and Its Relationship With Embryo Development in Vitro.” Computers in Biology and Medicine 168: 107785. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Reagan, K. L. , Deng S., Sheng J., et al. 2022. “Use of Machine‐Learning Algorithms to Aid in the Early Detection of Leptospirosis in Dogs.” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 34, no. 4: 612–621. 10.1177/10406387221096781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Reagan, K. L. , Reagan B. A., and Gilor C.. 2020. “Machine Learning Algorithm as a Diagnostic Tool for Hypoadrenocorticism in Dogs.” Domestic Animal Endocrinology 72: 106396. 10.1016/j.domaniend.2019.106396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Rehman, S. , Rantam F. A., Batool K., et al. 2022. “Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Associated with Avian Influenza among Undergraduate University Students of East Java Indonesia: A Cross‐Sectional Survey.” F1000research 11: 115. 10.12688/f1000research.74196.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Rexroad, C. E. , Vallet J. L., Matukumalli L. K., et al. 2019. “Genome to Phenome: Improving Animal Health, Production, and Well‐Being—A New USDA Blueprint for Animal Genome Research 2018–2027.” Frontiers in Genetics 10: 327. 10.3389/fgene.2019.00327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Rist, C. , Arriola C. S., and Rubin C.. 2014. “Prioritizing Zoonoses: A Proposed One Health Tool for Collaborative Decision‐Making.” PLoS ONE 9, no. 10: e109986. 10.1371/journal.pone.0109986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Robi, D. T. 2023. “Evaluation of Livestock Farmers' Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices regarding the Use of Veterinary Vaccines in Southwest Ethiopia.” Veterinary Medicine and Science 9, no. 6: 2871–2884. 10.1002/vms3.1290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Ryan, M. T. , Baird A. W., Mulholland C. W., and Irwin J. A.. 2009. “Practical Classes: A Platform for Deep Learning? Overall Context in the First‐Year Veterinary Curriculum.” Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 36, no. 2: 180–185. 10.3138/jvme.36.2.180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Sadeghi, H. , Braun H.‐S., Panti B., Opsomer G., and Bogado Pascottini O.. 2022. “Validation of a Deep Learning‐based Image Analysis System to Diagnose Subclinical Endometritis in Dairy Cows.” PLoS ONE 17, no. 1: e0263409. 10.1371/journal.pone.0263409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Sadeghi, M. , Banakar A., Minaei S., Orooji M., Shoushtari A., and Li G.. 2023. “Early Detection of Avian Diseases Based on Thermography and Artificial Intelligence.” Animals 13, no. 14: 2348. 10.3390/ani13142348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Sanchez‐Vazquez, M. J. , Nielen M., Edwards S. A., Gunn G. J., and Lewis F. I.. 2012. “Identifying Associations Between Pig Pathologies Using a Multi‐Dimensional Machine Learning Methodology.” BMC Veterinary Research 8: 151. 10.1186/1746-6148-8-151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Sani, Y. M. , Success U. E., and Adamu M.. 2019. “e‐Veterinary System for Diagnosis of Viral Infections in Poultry.” IEEESEM 7, no. 12: 32–41. [Google Scholar]
  137. Schofield, I. , Brodbelt D. C., Kennedy N., et al. 2021. “Machine‐Learning Based Prediction of Cushing's Syndrome in Dogs Attending UK Primary‐Care Veterinary Practice.” Scientific Reports 11, no. 1: 9035. 10.1038/s41598-021-88440-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Scorza, F. B. , and Pardi N.. 2018. “New Kids on the Block: RNA‐Based Influenza Virus Vaccines.” Vaccines 6, no. 2: 20. 10.3390/vaccines6020020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Serra Bragança, F. M. , Broomé S., Rhodin M., et al. 2020. “Improving Gait Classification in Horses by Using Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) Generated Data and Machine Learning.” Scientific Reports 10, no. 1: 17785. 10.1038/s41598-020-73215-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Shehu, B. M. , Rekwot P. I., Kezi D. M., Bidoli T. D., and Oyedokun A. O.. 2011. “Challenges to Farmers' Participation in Artificial Insemination (AI) Biotechnology in Nigeria: An Overview.” Journal of Agricultural Extension 14, no. 2: 123–129. 10.4314/jae.v14i2.64128. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  141. Silva, G. S. , Machado G., Baker K. L., Holtkamp D. J., and Linhares D. C. L.. 2019. “Machine‐Learning Algorithms to Identify Key Biosecurity Practices and Factors Associated With Breeding Herds Reporting PRRS Outbreak.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 171: 104749. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Sleeman, J. M. , De Liberto T., and Nguyen N.. 2017. “Optimization of Human, Animal, and Environmental Health by Using the One Health Approach.” Journal of Veterinary Science 18, no. S1: 263–268. 10.4142/JVS.2017.18.S1.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Smith, A. , Carroll P. W., Aravamuthan S., et al. 2024. “Computer Vision Model for the Detection of Canine Pododermatitis and Neoplasia of the Paw.” Veterinary Dermatology 35, no. 2: 138–147. 10.1111/vde.13221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Smiti, A. 2020. “When Machine Learning Meets Medical World: Current Status and Future Challenges.” Computer Science Review 37: 100280. 10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100280. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  145. Smythe, M. P. , Gupta V., Staiger E. A., Bao Y., and Brooks S. A.. 2021. “39 Using Artificial Intelligence to Analyze Horse Gait Parameters for Genomics Research in Musculoskeletal Traits.” Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 100: 103502. 10.1016/J.JEVS.2021.103502. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  146. Stark, K. 1999. “The Application of Non‐Parametric Techniques to Solve Classification Problems in Complex Data Sets in Veterinary Epidemiology? An Example.” Intelligent Data Analysis 3, no. 1: 23–35. 10.1016/S1088-467X(99)00003-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  147. Symes, L. B. , Kittelberger K. D., Stone S. M., et al. 2022. “Analytical Approaches for Evaluating Passive Acoustic Monitoring Data: A Case Study of Avian Vocalizations.” Ecology and Evolution 12, no. 4: e8797. 10.1002/ece3.8797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Tabak, M. A. , Norouzzadeh M. S., Wolfson D. W., et al. 2019. “Machine Learning to Classify Animal Species in Camera Trap Images: Applications in Ecology.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10, no. 4: 585–590. 10.1111/2041-210X.13120. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  149. Tahghighi, P. , Appleby R. B., Norena N., Ukwatta E., and Komeili A.. 2023. “Machine Learning Can Appropriately Classify the Collimation of Ventrodorsal and Dorsoventral Thoracic Radiographic Images of Dogs and Cats.” American Journal of Veterinary Research 84, no. 7: 1–8. 10.2460/ajvr.23.03.0062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Tang, A. , Tam R., Cadrin‐Chênevert A., et al. 2018. “Canadian Association of Radiologists White Paper on Artificial Intelligence in Radiology.” Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal 69, no. 2: 120–135. 10.1016/j.carj.2018.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Tokarz, D. A. , Steinbach T. J., Lokhande A., et al. 2021. “Using Artificial Intelligence to Detect, Classify, and Objectively Score Severity of Rodent Cardiomyopathy.” Toxicologic Pathology 49, no. 4: 888–896. 10.1177/0192623320972614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Tran, B. , Vu G., Ha G., et al. 2019. “Global Evolution of Research in Artificial Intelligence in Health and Medicine: A Bibliometric Study.” Journal of Clinical Medicine 8, no. 3: 360. 10.3390/jcm8030360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Valdes‐Donoso, P. , Waal K. V., Jarvis L. S., Wayne S. R., and Perez A. M.. 2017. “Using Machine Learning to Predict Swine Movements Within a Regional Program to Improve Control of Infectious Diseases in the US.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science 4: 2. 10.3389/fvets.2017.00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Valente, C. , Wodzinski M., Guglielmini C., et al. 2023. “Development of an Artificial Intelligence‐Based Method for the Diagnosis of the Severity of Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease From Canine Chest Radiographs.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science 10: 1227009. 10.3389/fvets.2023.1227009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Valletta, J. J. , Torney C., Kings M., Thornton A., and Madden J.. 2017. “Applications of Machine Learning in Animal Behaviour Studies.” Animal Behaviour 124: 203–220. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.12.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  156. Vinicki, K. , Ferrari P., Belić M., and Turk R.. (2018). “Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Determining Reticulocyte Percentage in Cats.” 10.48550/arXiv.1803.04873. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  157. Waljee, A. K. , and Higgins P. D. R.. 2010. “Machine Learning in Medicine: A Primer for Physicians.” American Journal of Gastroenterology 105, no. 6: 1224–1226. 10.1038/ajg.2010.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Walsh, D. P. , Ma T. F., Ip H. S., and Zhu J.. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence and Avian Influenza: Using Machine Learning to Enhance Active Surveillance for Avian Influenza Viruses.” Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 66, no. 6: 2537–2545. 10.1111/tbed.13318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Welsh, C. E. , Duz M., Parkin T. D. H., and Marshall J. F.. 2017. “Disease and Pharmacologic Risk Factors for First and Subsequent Episodes of Equine Laminitis: A Cohort Study of Free‐Text Electronic Medical Records.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 136: 11–18. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Werners, A. , and Fajt V. R.. 2020. “What a Veterinary Graduate Should Know About Basic and Clinical Pharmacology: A Delphi Study to Finalize Day‐1 Competencies.” Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 44, no. 4: 568–574. 10.1111/jvp.12920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Woldemariam, S. , Abdi A. A., Asfaw W., and Haile T.. 2018. “Assessment of the Veterinary Cost Recovery Scheme in the Amhara Region, Ethiopia.” Ethiopian Veterinary Journal 22, no. 1: 87. 10.4314/evj.v22i1.7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  162. Wong, K. K. , Greenbaum A., Moll M., et al. 2012. “Outbreak of Influenza a (H3N2) Variant Virus Infection among Attendees of an Agricultural Fair, Pennsylvania, USA, 2011.” Emerging Infectious Diseases 18, no. 12: 1937–1944. 10.3201/eid1812.121097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Xu, X. , Mazloom R., Goligerdian A., et al. 2019. “Making Sense of Pharmacovigilance and Drug Adverse Event Reporting: Comparative Similarity Association Analysis Using AI Machine Learning Algorithms in Dogs and Cats.” Topics in Companion Animal Medicine 37: 100366. 10.1016/j.tcam.2019.100366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Yerlikaya, N. 2024. “Views of Veterinary Faculty Students on the Concept of Artificial Intelligence and Its Use in Veterinary Medicine Practices: An Example of Ankara University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine.” Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 71, no. 3: 249–257. 10.33988/auvfd.1221352. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  165. Yoo, D. S. , Chun B. C., Hong K., and Kim J.. 2022. “Risk Prediction of Three Different Subtypes of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Outbreaks in Poultry Farms: Based on Spatial Characteristics of Infected Premises in South Korea.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science 9: 897763. 10.3389/fvets.2022.897763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Yousefinaghani, S. , Dara R. A., Poljak Z., and Sharif S.. 2020. “A Decision Support Framework for Prediction of Avian Influenza.” Scientific Reports 10, no. 1: 19011. 10.1038/s41598-020-75889-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Zapata, L. , Chalco L., Aguilar L., et al. 2020. “Detection of Cutaneous Tumors in Dogs Using Deep Learning Techniques.” Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 965: 83–91. 10.1007/978-3-030-20454-9_8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  168. Zeldis, D. , and Prescott S.. 2000. “Fish Disease Diagnosis Program‐Problems and some Solutions.” Aquacultural Engineering 23: 3–11. www.elsevier.nl/locate/aqua‐online. [Google Scholar]
  169. Zetian, F. , Feng X., Yun Z., and XiaoShuan Z.. 2005. “Pig‐vet: A Web‐Based Expert System for Pig Disease Diagnosis.” Expert Systems with Applications 29, no. 1: 93–103. 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.01.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  170. Zhang, X. , Sun H., Cunningham F. L., et al. 2018. “Tissue Tropisms Opt for Transmissible Reassortants During Avian and Swine Influenza a Virus Co‐Infection in Swine.” PLoS Pathogens 14, no. 12: e1007417. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Zhang, Y. , Nie A., Zehnder A., Page R. L., and Zou J.. 2019. “VetTag: Improving Automated Veterinary Diagnosis Coding via Large‐Scale Language Modeling.” NPJ Digital Medicine 2, no. 1: 35. 10.1038/s41746-019-0113-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Zitnik, M. , Nguyen F., Wang B., Leskovec J., Goldenberg A., and Hoffman M. M.. 2019. “Machine Learning for Integrating Data in Biology and Medicine: Principles, Practice, and Opportunities.” Information Fusion 50: 71–91. 10.1016/j.inffus.2018.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.


Articles from Veterinary Medicine and Science are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES