Abstract
Background and objectives
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal disorder characterized by troublesome symptoms affecting the quality of life. Sodium alginate antacid suspension provides quick and prolonged relief of symptoms due to its unique mechanism of action. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate improvement in GERD symptoms by assessing changes in symptom scores at the end of one week and to evaluate the responder rate. The secondary objective was to evaluate patient tolerability using the frequency and severity of adverse events and physician-reported outcomes.
Methods
This was a retrospective, observational data collection study that reviewed medical records of GERD patients who received sodium alginate antacid suspension (10-20 ml, 3-4 times daily) for one week. Data were retrieved, analyzed, translated into symptom scores (GERD Health-Related Quality of Life score), and classified based on disease severity. Primary outcomes were improvement in symptom scores (heartburn, regurgitation, swallowing difficulties, and bloating) and total scores at the end of treatment. The responder rates, physician-reported outcomes, and tolerability were also analyzed.
Results
Medical records for 10,000 patients treated with sodium alginate antacid suspension were reviewed. Out of these, data for 6,246 patients was further analyzed. Treatment with sodium alginate antacid suspension resulted in significant reductions in heartburn, regurgitation, swallowing difficulties, and bloating scores (p<0.001) in patients with moderate to severe GERD. The mean total GERD symptom score also decreased significantly from baseline (p<0.001). The responder rate, i.e., a reduction of ≥50% in the total symptom score from baseline to the end of one week, was 74%. Almost 90% of patients reported symptom improvement, but 2.22% of patients experienced adverse events. As per physicians, this suspension was effective in 96.64% of patients.
Conclusion
This real-world evidence study highlights rapid symptomatic relief in GERD patients with sodium alginate antacid suspension.
Keywords: alginates, gastroesophageal reflux disease, heartburn, real-world setting, regurgitation, sodium alginate antacid
Introduction
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal disorder affecting 20% of the population worldwide [1,2]. In India, GERD prevalence varies between 7.6% and 30% [3-5]. It is characterized by the regurgitation of stomach acid contents into the esophagus and presents with symptoms such as heartburn, regurgitation, and chest pain [1,2,6].
GERD represents a significant health concern due to its association with considerable morbidity and diminished quality of life [1,6,7]. Additionally, the symptoms of GERD often lead to sleep disturbances, which can further impact overall well-being [5,7,8]. Effective and rapid symptomatic relief is crucial for managing GERD [1,9]. Alleviating symptoms such as heartburn and regurgitation contribute to a reduction in pain and physical discomfort [1,8]. This, in turn, can lead to better sleep, enhancement in daily functioning, and overall improvement in quality of life [1,9].
GERD is typically managed through a combination of strategies, including lifestyle modifications, dietary adjustments, and the use of potent acid-suppressing agents such as antacids, histamine (H2) receptor antagonists, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) [8,10]. Antacids, in particular, offer a means to achieve rapid relief from GERD symptoms by neutralizing stomach acid and providing prompt alleviation of discomfort [10]. Raft-forming antacids represent an ideal choice for managing GERD, considering their unique mechanism of action [11].
Alginate is a key component in many raft-forming systems, a natural polysaccharide polymer extracted from brown seaweed (Phaeophyceae) [11]. When exposed to gastric acid, alginates rapidly form a gel-like raft that targets and displaces the acid pocket distal to the oesophagogastric junction [12-15]. This raft-like barrier protects the esophageal mucosa by preventing acid from refluxing into the esophagus, thereby alleviating GERD symptoms [13,14].
Studies have shown that alginates are particularly effective at managing the acid pocket, a layer of excess acid that forms above an ingested meal [14]. Alginates, when combined with antacids, offer greater relief from heartburn and reduce acid exposure time more effectively than antacids alone [14]. Furthermore, they can enhance symptom control beyond that achieved with PPIs [13,14].
Although numerous studies on using alginate antacids in patients experiencing GERD symptoms yielded promising findings [15-18], there is still a gap in the data that demonstrates its effect on symptom relief in GERD in real-world settings, particularly in Indian patients. Thus, this real-world observational study evaluated the improvement in GERD symptoms in Indian patients receiving sodium alginate antacid suspension for a short duration. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate improvement in GERD symptoms by assessing changes in symptom scores at the end of one week and to evaluate the responder rate. The secondary objective was to evaluate patient tolerability using the frequency and severity of adverse events and physician-reported outcomes.
Materials and methods
Study design, patient characteristics, and sample size
This was a retrospective, observational, real-world medical record-based study. Medical records of adult patients (age ≥18 years) who consented to the future use of their medical records were retrieved. Data of GERD patients who were previously treated with sodium alginate antacid suspension, were analyzed. The sample size for this data retrieval study was 10,000.
Outcome measurement
Collection of Data
The anonymized records collected for the patients were reviewed. Details of the general examination and GERD symptoms were identified from the medical records. The general examination included measurements of pulse, blood pressure, body weight, and height. GERD symptoms included heartburn, regurgitation, difficulty swallowing, and bloating. Since this was a retrospective study, data for all the parameters for all patients were not available. We have included the data of patients who received sodium alginate antacid suspension, and symptom scores were available.
Translation of Data
The GERD symptoms reported in medical records were translated into symptom scores using the GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire [19] parameters. Scores were assigned for heartburn, regurgitation, bloating, and swallowing difficulties as per the following scale: 0 - no symptoms; 1 - noticeable, but not bothersome; 2 - noticeable, bothersome, but not every day; 3 - bothersome daily; 4 - bothersome and affects daily activities; 5 - incapacitating to do daily activities. The highest possible score for each symptom category was 30, while the lowest was 0. The maximum possible total score was 75 (indicating the worst symptoms), and the minimum possible score was 0 (indicating no symptoms). Scores ≤12 indicated mild symptoms, while scores >12 indicated moderate to severe symptoms. These scores were used to classify the data based on disease severity.
Details of the effect of treatment and its tolerability based on patients' and physicians' records were also analyzed.
Endpoints
Primary Endpoints
Improvement in GERD symptoms was measured by changes in symptom scores at the end of one week. The responder's rate, i.e., a reduction of 50% or more in the total symptom score from baseline to the end of one week, was also calculated based on the symptom scores [20,21].
Secondary Endpoints
Patient tolerability was assessed through the frequency and severity of adverse events and physician-reported outcomes.
Statistical analysis
Data measured on a continuous scale were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical data were represented as proportions or percentages. A paired t-test was carried out to compare the improvement in symptom scores at baseline and one week ± two days after sodium alginate antacid suspension. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20. version (IBM, Inc., Armonk, US), and p-value <0.001 was considered to be significant.
Ethical considerations
This study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee Dhanashree Hospital and registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) with registration number CTRI/2024/07/070568.
Results
Baseline demographics
Data from centers encompassing 10,000 patients who received sodium alginate antacid suspension for one week ± two days were retrieved and analyzed. Data for 7,192 patients for whom the records were available was further reviewed for the study. Based on the translation of symptoms into GERD symptom scores, data was categorized into two groups: patients with mild symptoms (total score ≤12) and those with moderate to severe symptoms (total score >12). Data from records for 6,246 patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms was further analyzed. The mean age of patients was 42.43 years. The other parameters are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Measurements during general examination at baseline.
| Variable | n | Mean±SD | ||
| Gender | Male | 3944 | - | |
| Female | 2199 | |||
| Pulse rate (beats/min) | 3027 | 82.87±12.04 | ||
| Body weight (kg) | 3242 | 65.68±11.23 | ||
| Height (cm) | 3153 | 164.74±12.32 | ||
| Blood pressure (mmHg) | Systolic | 3102 | 127.50±13.74 | |
| Diastolic | 3090 | 83.59±13.96 | ||
Symptom relief at the end of treatment
The mean total heartburn score decreased significantly from baseline to the end of treatment, reflecting a significant reduction in heartburn symptoms. Similarly, there was a significant decrease in the mean total regurgitation score, indicating an improvement in regurgitation symptoms. The mean total swallowing and bloating scores also showed a significant reduction, demonstrating relief from these symptoms. Overall, the mean total score also reduced at the end of treatment, indicating an improvement across all measured parameters. Thus, treatment with sodium alginate antacid suspension led to substantial relief from GERD symptoms (Table 2).
Table 2. Symptomatic relief with sodium alginate antacid suspension.
Paired t-test was performed and p-values were calculated.
EOT - end of treatment
| Parameter | Number of patients | Mean±SD | p-values | Mean reduction in symptom scores (%) | |
| Baseline | EOT (1 week ± 2 days) | ||||
| Total heartburn scores | 6246 | 13.96±4.62 | 4.84±4.25 | <0.001 | 65.32 |
| Total regurgitation scores | 6246 | 12.62±4.94 | 4.54±4.12 | <0.001 | 64.02 |
| Total swallowing and bloating scores | 6246 | 5.84±3.08 | 2.12±2.26 | <0.001 | 63.69 |
| Total score | 6246 | 32.42±10.86 | 11.51±9.82 | <0.001 | 64.49 |
The responders' rate was >74% for all symptoms and 71.82% for the total symptom reduction within one week of treatment (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Responders rate for improvement in the symptoms of GERD.
GERD - gastroesophageal reflux disease
Patient-reported improvement in symptoms
Patients reported clinically meaningful improvement in heartburn, regurgitation, and overall symptoms on treatment with sodium alginate antacid suspension (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Patients reported clinically meaningful improvement in GERD symptoms.
GERD - gastroesophageal reflux disease
Tolerability of sodium alginate antacid suspension
Adverse effects were reported in 2.22%, 139 out of 6246 patients. Overall, no serious adverse reactions were reported.
Physician-reported outcomes
According to the physicians, sodium alginate antacid was effective in 96.64%, 4058 out of 4199 patients.
Discussion
GERD is a prevalent condition and is typically characterized by symptoms such as heartburn and acid regurgitation [1]. These symptoms disrupt the daily lives of affected individuals by affecting physical activity, impairing social functioning, disturbing sleep, and decreasing productivity at work, thereby negatively impacting their quality of life [5,22-23]. Thus, rapid and effective alleviation of symptoms is important in GERD patients as it helps in improving quality of life [9].
Alginate antacids have an important place in GERD therapy due to their unique mechanism of action. These formulations form a viscous gel or raft that acts as a physical barrier, preventing gastric contents from refluxing into the esophagus [24-25]. This barrier is created swiftly, typically within seconds of administration, and can persist in the stomach for several hours [20]. This physical action provides rapid and prolonged symptom relief compared to traditional antacids. Alginate antacids have demonstrated effectiveness both as standalone treatments and as adjuncts to acid-suppressing medications, particularly for managing breakthrough symptoms along with PPIs [24].
The present study demonstrates that sodium alginate antacid suspension provides significant alleviation of GERD symptoms, such as heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, and bloating, within one week of initiating treatment. By the end of the treatment period, there were marked reductions in symptom scores. Over 90% of patients reported improvement in heartburn, regurgitation, and overall symptoms. Additionally, more than 75% of patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in heartburn, while over 70% experienced comparable reductions in regurgitation, dysphagia, and bloating. In terms of tolerability, the sodium alginate antacid suspension was generally well-tolerated, with only 2.22% of patients reporting adverse drug reactions.
The results of this study highlight the efficacy of sodium alginate antacid suspension in providing rapid and substantial relief from GERD symptoms in Indian patients. The significant symptom alleviation observed within one week, combined with a high rate of patient response and overall tolerability, suggests that alginate antacids are important for patients seeking prompt relief from their symptoms.
Large sample size and real-world evidence mimicking clinical settings are the strengths of this study. However, this study also has some limitations. Retrospective open-label study, missing data, and lack of medications co-prescribed are some important limitations of the study, which may affect the generalizability of the study results. Despite these multiple limitations, we believe that the study highlights some clinically relevant information for practicing clinicians.
Conclusions
The present Indian real-world evidence highlights that sodium alginate antacid suspension offers rapid and significant relief from GERD symptoms, such as heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, and bloating, with noticeable improvements within one week of treatment.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Ms. Vaishali Dalvi and Ms. Mihira Chavan for data management, Simple Statistics Solutions for supporting statistical analysis of data, and Dr. Heena Bhojwani for medical writing support for this manuscript.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Independent Ethics Committee Dhanashree Hospital issued approval CTRI/2024/07/070568. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, approved by the Independent Ethics Committee Dhanashree Hospital, and registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) with registration number CTRI/2024/07/070568.
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: Dr. Onkar C Swami and Dr. Dinesh R Patil declare(s) employment from Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd. which actively markets sodium alginate antacid suspension.
Other relationships: The research work and publication costs were funded by Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Dinesh R. Patil, Onkar C. Swami
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Dinesh R. Patil, Thoguluva S. Chandrasekhara, Umesh Chandra Patra, Pradeep Kumar Agarwal, Lalit Shimpi, Kalyan Bose, Sandeep Kulkarni, Onkar C. Swami
Drafting of the manuscript: Dinesh R. Patil, Onkar C. Swami
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Dinesh R. Patil, Thoguluva S. Chandrasekhara, Umesh Chandra Patra, Pradeep Kumar Agarwal, Lalit Shimpi, Kalyan Bose, Sandeep Kulkarni, Onkar C. Swami
Supervision: Dinesh R. Patil, Onkar C. Swami
References
- 1.Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) Clarrett DM, Hachem C. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6140167/ Mo Med. 2018;115:214–218. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.A narrative review of the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) Boulton KH, Dettmar PW. Ann Esophagus. 2022;5:1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Indian consensus on gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults: a position statement of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology. Bhatia SJ, Makharia GK, Abraham P, et al. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019;38:411–440. doi: 10.1007/s12664-019-00979-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Prevalence and risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the Indian population: a meta-analysis and meta-regression study. Rai S, Kulkarni A, Ghoshal UC. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2021;40:209–219. doi: 10.1007/s12664-020-01104-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.API-ISG consensus guidelines for management of gastrooesophageal reflux disease. Bhatia S, Pareek KK, Kumar A, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32978931/ J Assoc Physicians India. 2020;68:69–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Antunes C, Aleem A, Curtis SA. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; [ Jun; 2024 ]. 2023. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on work absenteeism, presenteeism and productivity in daily life: a European observational study. Gisbert JP, Cooper A, Karagiannis D, Hatlebakk J, Agréus L, Jablonowski H, Nuevo J. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:90. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Standards of care for GERD. [ Jun; 2024 ]. 2016. https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/standards-of-care-for-gerd https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/standards-of-care-for-gerd
- 9.Goals of therapy and guidelines for treatment success in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease patients. Bytzer P. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:0–9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9270(03)00013-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.An expert opinion on antacids: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy. Shetty B, Vishwanath MK. F1000Res. 2022;11:1057. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Raft‐forming polysaccharides for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD): systematic review. Yousaf M, Nirwan JS, Smith AM, et al. J Appl Polym Sci. 2019;136:48012. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Alginate therapy is effective treatment for GERD symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Leiman DA, Riff BP, Morgan S, et al. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30:1–9. doi: 10.1093/dote/dow020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alginate rafts localize to the acid pocket and reduce acid reflux in GERD. Leake I. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10:386. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gyawali CP, Fass R. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:302–318. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Randomised clinical trial: relief of upper gastrointestinal symptoms by an acid pocket-targeting alginate-antacid (Gaviscon Double Action) - a double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot study in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Thomas E, Wade A, Crawford G, Jenner B, Levinson N, Wilkinson J. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39:595–602. doi: 10.1111/apt.12640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Efficacy and safety of alginate formulations in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Zhao CX, Wang JW, Gong M. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24:11845–11857. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202011_23841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gaviscon Double Action Liquid (antacid and alginate) is more effective than antacid in controlling post-prandial oesophageal acid exposure in GERD patients: a double-blind crossover study. De Ruigh A, Roman S, Chen J, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;40:531–537. doi: 10.1111/apt.12857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.An alginate-antacid formulation (Gaviscon Double Action Liquid) can eliminate or displace the postprandial 'acid pocket' in symptomatic GERD patients. Kwiatek MA, Roman S, Fareeduddin A, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:59–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04678.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Comparison of generic (SF-36) vs. disease-specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of-life scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Velanovich V. J Gastrointest Surg. 1998;2:141–145. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(98)80004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of PPI-dependent GERD: results from a randomised, sham controlled trial. Kalapala R, Karyampudi A, Nabi Z, et al. Gut. 2022;71:686–694. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Efficacy of S-pantoprazole 10 mg in the symptom control of non-erosive reflux disease: a phase iii placebo-controlled trial. Cho YK, Choi MG, Park H, et al. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;27:223–230. doi: 10.5056/jnm19053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Heartburn and regurgitation have different impacts on life quality of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Lee SW, Lien HC, Lee TY, Yang SS, Yeh HJ, Chang CS. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:12277–12282. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i34.12277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on patients' daily lives: a European observational study in the primary care setting. Gisbert JP, Cooper A, Karagiannis D, Hatlebakk J, Agréus L, Jablonowski H, Zapardiel J. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:60. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Review article: alginate-raft formulations in the treatment of heartburn and acid reflux. Mandel KG, Daggy BP, Brodie DA, Jacoby HI. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14:669–690. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.00759.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Post-prandial reflux suppression by a raft-forming alginate (Gaviscon Advance) compared to a simple antacid documented by magnetic resonance imaging and pH-impedance monitoring: mechanistic assessment in healthy volunteers and randomised, controlled, double-blind study in reflux patients. Sweis R, Kaufman E, Anggiansah A, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;37:1093–1102. doi: 10.1111/apt.12318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


