Table 2.
Weighted and unweighted PAF for ten domains
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domains | Un weighted PAF |
Communality | Weighted PAF |
Un weighted PAF |
Communality | Weighted PAF |
| Biochemical measurements | 0.115 | 0.344 | 0.045 | 0.117 | 0.537 | 0.045 |
| Circadian | 0.248 | 0.130 | 0.098 | 0.250 | 0.105 | 0.097 |
| Dietary | 0.169 | 0.240 | 0.067 | 0.184 | 0.235 | 0.071 |
| Family factors | 0.082 | 0.172 | 0.032 | 0.082 | 0.042 | 0.032 |
| Health and medical history | 0.301 | 0.245 | 0.119 | 0.301 | 0.246 | 0.117 |
| Lifestyle | 0.252 | 0.184 | 0.099 | 0.265 | 0.145 | 0.103 |
| Physical activity | 0.257 | 0.212 | 0.101 | 0.263 | 0.198 | 0.102 |
| Physical measures | 0.247 | 0.118 | 0.097 | 0.256 | 0.205 | 0.100 |
| Psychosocial factors | 0.264 | 0.236 | 0.104 | 0.288 | 0.184 | 0.112 |
| Sociodemographics | 0.246 | 0.119 | 0.097 | 0.222 | 0.103 | 0.087 |
|
Overall weighted PAF |
85.9 | 86.6 | ||||
The calculation of the weighted PAF considered the overlap between risk factors. The unfavorable profiles were reclassified as intermediate or favorable categories in model 1. In model 2, all risk factors were reclassified into the favorable tertile. Robust and pre-frailty individuals were set as the control group
PAF population attributable fraction