Table 2.
Fit indices for the heel gait attractiveness model (Figure 6), including group-specific models (male and female), the configuration invariance model (CI model), and measurement invariance models (MI models).
| Models | χ 2 | df | p | GFI | AGFI | CFI | RMSEA | AIC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group-specific models | Female | 24.31 | 3 | <0.001 | 0.992 | 0.944 | 0.959 | 0.083 | 66.31 |
| Male | 30.99 | 3 | <0.001 | 0.990 | 0.929 | 0.946 | 0.096 | 72.99 | |
| CI model | 55.29 | 6 | <0.001 | 0.991 | 0.937 | 0.952 | 0.064 | 127.29 | |
| Weak MI model | 65.76 | 13 | <0.001 | 0.989 | 0.965 | 0.949 | 0.045 | 125.76 | |
| MI model | 67.76 | 19 | <0.001 | 0.989 | 0.975 | 0.953 | 0.036 | 115.76 | |
| Strong MI model | 70.82 | 25 | <0.001 | 0.988 | 0.981 | 0.956 | 0.030 | 106.82 | |