Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 15;15(3):1158–1173. doi: 10.62347/UMKG8609

Table 3.

Comparison of counting data between metastatic and non-metastatic patients in the training set

Variable Total LNM group (n=80) Non-LNM group (n=348) Statistic P
Age
    <45 189 36 153 0.028 0.867
    ≥45 239 44 195
BMI
    <24 kg/m2 151 24 127 1.201 0.273
    ≥24 kg/m2 277 56 221
Disease type
    Squamous cell carcinoma 380 69 311 1.707 0.426
    Adenocarcinoma 43 9 34
    Others 5 2 3
Tumor size
    <2 cm 203 29 174 9.758 0.008
    2-4 cm 199 41 158
    >4 cm 26 10 16
FIGO grading
    IB1 181 24 157 15.523 0.001
    IB2 157 27 130
    IB3 26 10 16
    IIA1 64 19 45
Differentiation degree
    Well differentiated 160 20 140 8.343 0.015
    Moderately differentiated 164 41 123
    Poorly differentiated 104 19 85
Lymphovascular invasion
    Without 89 26 63 8.185 0.004
    With 339 54 285
History of hypertension
    Without 72 10 62 1.314 0.252
    With 356 70 286
History of diabetes
    Without 51 6 45 1.828 0.176
    With 377 74 303

Note: LNM, Lymph node metastasis; BMI, body mass index; FIGO, International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology.