Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 15;15(3):1158–1173. doi: 10.62347/UMKG8609

Table 8.

AUC comparison of models in the training set

Marker 1 Marker 2 Z value P value AUC difference 95% CI
XGBoost AdaBoost 1.342 0.18 0.013 -0.006-0.032
XGBoost Random Forest 6.118 <0.001 0.157 0.107-0.208
XGBoost SVM 6.904 <0.001 0.156 0.112-0.200
XGBoost LASSO 2.058 0.04 0.018 0.001-0.036
AdaBoost Random Forest 5.861 <0.001 0.144 0.096-0.193
AdaBoost SVM 6.375 <0.001 0.143 0.099-0.187
AdaBoost LASSO 0.594 0.553 0.005 -0.012-0.022
Random Forest SVM -0.059 0.953 -0.001 -0.049-0.046
Random Forest LASSO -5.936 <0.001 -0.139 -0.185 - -0.093
SVM LASSO -6.497 <0.001 -0.138 -0.179 - -0.096

Note: AUC, area under the curve; XGBoost, eXtreme Gradient Boosting; AdaBoost, Adaptive Boosting; SVM, Support Vector Machine; LASSO, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator.