Abstract
The skin is the body's largest organ and performs several vital functions, such as controlling the movement of essential substances while protecting against external threats. Although mainly composed of keratinocytes (KCs), the skin also contains a complex network of immune cells that play a critical role in host defense and maintaining skin homeostasis. KCs proliferate in the basal layer of the epidermis and undergo differentiation, altering their functional and phenotypic characteristics. These differentiation steps are crucial for the stratification of the epidermis and the formation of the stratum corneum, ensuring the skin barrier's functions. Exposure to UV, environmental pollutants, or chemicals can lead to an overproduction of reactive species of oxygen (ROS), leading to oxidative stress. To ensure redox homeostasis and prevent damage resulting from the formation of ROS, the skin has an extensive network of antioxidant defense systems, mainly orchestrated by the nuclear factor erythroid‐2‐related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway. Indeed, Nrf2 induces the expression of detoxification and antioxidant enzymes and suppresses inductions of pro‐inflammatory cytokine genes. In this context, Nrf2 is critical in preserving skin functions such as epidermal differentiation, regulating skin immunity, and managing environmental stresses. Besides, this pathway plays an important role in the pathogenesis of common inflammatory skin diseases such as allergic contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis. Therefore, the present review highlights the crucial role of Nrf2 in KCs for maintaining skin homeostasis and regulating skin immunity, as well as its contribution to the pathophysiology of inflammatory skin diseases. Finally, a particular emphasis will be placed on the therapeutic potential of targeting the Nrf2 pathway to alleviate symptoms of these inflammatory skin disorders.
Keywords: allergic contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, barrier functions, inflammation, Nrf2, psoriasis, skin
Nrf2 is essential for maintaining skin homeostasis and regulating inflammation. This review highlights the multifaceted role of Nrf2 in skin inflammatory diseases like atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. While Nrf2 activation can be therapeutic, excessive activation can paradoxically exacerbate skin conditions.

Abbreviations
- ACD
allergic contact dermatitis
- AD
atopic dermatitis
- AhR
aryl hydrocarbon receptor
- ARE
Antioxidant Response Element
- DMF
dimethyl fumarate
- DNCB
2,4‐dinitrochlorobenzene
- GSH
glutathione
- HO‐1
heme oxygenase‐1
- IL
interleukin
- IMQ
imiquimod
- KCs
keratinocytes
- Keap1
kelch‐like ECH‐associating protein 1
- NF‐κB
nuclear factor‐kappa B
- NQO1
NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1
- Nrf2
nuclear factor erythroid‐2‐related factor 2
- PBM
photobiomodulation
- PRRs
pattern recognition receptors
- RNS
reactive nitrogen species
- ROS
reactive oxygen species
- SFN
sulforaphane
- sMAF
small Maf proteins
- TNF‐a
tumor necrosis factor‐alpha
- UV
ultraviolet
1. INTRODUCTION
Keratinocytes (KCs), which are the most abundant cells of the epidermis, continuously communicate with immune cells residing in the skin through the production of soluble signaling molecules such as cytokines and chemokines to maintain cutaneous homeostasis. 1 KCs have a dynamic response depending on the type of stimulation and can secrete various sets of cytokines and chemokines, including Interleukin (IL)‐1, IL‐20, and tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α) that can coordinate the skin inflammatory response whenever it is triggered. 2 Indeed, inflammation of the skin is driven by various external stimuli, such as injuries, UV radiation, allergen uptake, microbial challenge, contact with irritants, or drugs, or it can be due to intrinsic, not always well‐defined, stimuli (e.g., mutations, autoantigens). The specific responses characterized by the kind of cytokines and immune cells involved and the extent of the reaction depend not only on the trigger but also on the individual genetic predisposition and daily lifestyle, including diet, alcohol consumption, and smoking. 3 , 4
There are two distinct forms of cutaneous inflammation: acute and chronic. Acute inflammation is a normal self‐limiting response to specific infectious agents, internal/external injury, chemicals, and UV exposure. The first step involves detecting danger signals, including pathogen‐ and damage‐associated molecular patterns (PAMPs and DAMPs) through numerous pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) expressed by the immune and non‐immune skin‐resident cells. In response to the recognition of these signals, PRRs activate downstream specific signaling cascades, resulting in the subsequent activation of nuclear factor kappa‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B (NF‐κB) and the inflammasome. These pro‐inflammatory pathways mainly culminate in the induction of several pro‐inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF‐α, IL‐1, IL‐6, and interferons (IFNs), as well as thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and chemokines, including IL‐8, CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL10, CCL2, and CCL20. The various secreted chemokines drive an influx of different types of immune cell subsets like neutrophils, monocytes, or T cells recruited to the site of inflammation, thereby promoting an effective immune response. 5 , 6 Acute inflammation aims to eliminate the causes of cellular damage, clear or absorb necrotic cells, and initiate tissue repair. However, a prolonged unregulated inflammatory response can lead to chronic inflammation continually causing tissue injury, commonly observed in many chronic dermatitis, such as atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis. Many pro‐inflammatory signaling pathways are activated in the epidermis of patients with inflammatory skin disease, suggesting that KCs have a crucial role in shaping and regulating inflammation in the skin. 7 Accumulating evidence indicates that KCs play an active role in the pathogenesis of many, if not all, inflammatory skin diseases by highly interacting with immune cells, thus initiating or sustaining the inflammatory response. 8
Skin inflammatory diseases are often associated with redox abnormalities that must be regulated to ensure redox homeostasis within the cell and protect against inflammation. 9 To prevent oxidant damage, the skin possesses an extensive network of antioxidants, mainly orchestrated by the redox‐sensitive transcription factor nuclear factor erythroid‐2‐related factor 2 (Nrf2). 10 , 11 Here, we review the significant roles of the Nrf2 signaling pathway in the pathophysiology of the most common inflammatory skin diseases such as psoriasis, AD, and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). After an overview of the Nrf2 signaling pathway, we performed a literature review by exploring clinical and experimental studies that addressed the role of NRF2 expression and the effectiveness of therapies targeting the NRF2 pathway in both in vivo and in vitro settings.
2. SKIN AND REDOX STATUS
Skin homeostasis involves fine‐tuning its redox balance. Under physiological conditions, all types of skin cells produce, in a controlled manner, different reactive species, including the reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the reactive nitrogen species (RNS). 12 , 13 Reactive sulfur species (RSS) have also been identified as omnipresent molecules in redox biology, playing pivotal roles in cellular functions and redox homeostasis. 14 The newly introduced concept of “skin redoxome” represents the cutaneous redox environment, including the generation of reactive species, their neutralization through antioxidants, and the signaling networks responsible for organizing the redox balance. 15 Since ROS and other highly reactive molecules—when produced at relatively low levels—are involved in fundamental cellular processes at steady state, redox homeostasis is essential to ensure skin biological functions. 16 The control of the balance between reactive species production and neutralization is thus crucial and is based on a wide range of detoxification systems. Besides, the skin, because of its strategic position, is particularly exposed to environmental aggressions. Integrating these different stresses by the tissue can lead to an imbalance state known as “oxidative stress.” In case of excessive stress, these detoxification systems can become overwhelmed and fail to maintain steady state control, resulting in an imbalance of the skin redox status.
Skin inflammatory diseases are often associated with redox abnormalities. Evidence shows increased markers of oxidative stress in psoriasis and AD patients, especially during AD exacerbation, as well as an altered antioxidant defense. 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 Other studies reported an increased expression of reactive species producers such as inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in psoriatic skin lesions, 22 and an activation of myeloperoxidase and NADPH oxidase (NOX) in ACD. 23 These findings suggest the involvement of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis and the development of several inflammatory skin diseases. 9 , 24 Indeed, oxidative stress and inflammation are tightly related pathophysiological processes often present simultaneously in many pathological skin conditions. The inflammatory process constantly generates oxidative stress since reactive species are produced by cells involved in the host‐defense response, mainly the phagocytic cells. Oxidants, in turn, promote tissue inflammation either directly by inducing damage to biomolecules within the cell or the skin tissue, or by activating multiple pro‐inflammatory pathways, such as NF‐κB, mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK), and janus kinase‐signal transducer and activator of transcription protein (JAK‐STAT) signaling pathways associated with the inflammatory response. 25
Reactive species must be promptly detoxified to ensure dynamic redox homeostasis within the cell and protect against inflammation. To prevent oxidant damage, the skin possesses an extensive network of antioxidants, including antioxidant enzymes and non‐enzymatic antioxidants that inhibit, delay, or completely scavenge the action of free radicals and oxidants. 13 It is well established that the antioxidant response is mainly orchestrated by the redox‐sensitive transcription factor Nrf2, a key component regulating the inflammation signaling cascades and oxidative stress responses. 10 , 11
2.1. The Keap1–Nrf2 pathway
Nrf2, encoded by the NFE2L2 gene, belongs to the mammalian cap‘n’collar (CNC) subfamily of basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factors. Nrf2 is a master regulator of antioxidant gene expression in response to oxidative stress. 26 It is also a cytoprotective transcription factor and could drive detoxification and excretion mechanisms of organic xenobiotics and toxic metals by regulating the expression of phase II enzymes. 27 , 28 Nrf2 is negatively regulated at the protein level through direct interaction with the dimeric cysteine‐rich, Kelch‐like ECH‐associating protein 1 (Keap1). 29 The cysteine residues of Keap1 are important stress sensors and are targets for a range of chemicals and oxidants. The highly reactive cysteine residue, Cys‐151, senses mainly electrophilic compounds, including potent activators of Nrf2, such as sulforaphane (SFN) found in cruciferous vegetables and dimethyl fumarate (DMF). 30 , 31 , 32 It is assumed that other cysteines, including but not limited to Cys‐273 and Cys‐288, also play a role in Keap1's ability to sense and respond to stress. 33
Under normal basal conditions, Nrf2 primarily resides in the cytoplasm, where it forms a complex with Keap1. This association constantly leads to Nrf2 polyubiquitination through the Cullin 3 (Cul3)‐E3 ubiquitin ligase and addresses it to the degradation by the proteasome 34 (Figure 1). Thus, Nrf2 is an unstable protein with a short half‐life of approximately 10–30 min and a high turnover, allowing for the maintenance of low basal levels of Nrf2 in normal conditions and providing a readily available pool of newly translated protein that can be rapidly stabilized in response to stress. 35 Upon exposure to electrophilic chemicals or reactive species, modifications occur in the cysteine thiols of Keap1, disrupting the Keap1–Nrf2 complex, thus stabilizing Nrf2 36 , 37 (Figure 1). While modification of Cys151 is thought to disrupt the Keap1–Cul3 interaction, other cysteines also play critical roles in Nrf2 regulation. Specifically, modification of cysteines, such as Cys‐288 within Keap1's Intervening Region (IVR), disrupts the Keap1–Nrf2 interaction via the “hinge and latch” mechanism. 35 Modification of cysteines is thought to induce conformational changes in Keap1, hindering its ability to efficiently target Nrf2 for ubiquitination and degradation, thereby promoting Nrf2 accumulation (Figure 1). The accumulation of neo‐synthesized Nrf2 is further facilitated by its phosphorylation through various kinases, including PKC, CK2, PERK, CDK5, and MAPKs. These phosphorylations can increase Nrf2 stability and are context‐dependent, occurring under certain stimulation and/or in specific tissues. 38 Phosphorylated Nrf2 subsequently migrates to the cell nucleus, where Nrf2 forms a complex with one of the small Maf proteins (sMaf) crucial for activating the transcription of Nrf2 target genes. 39 , 40 The Nrf2/sMaf complex activates the expression of approximately 200 genes by binding to a specific DNA binding motif known as antioxidant response element (ARE) 27 , 34 (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1.

Schematic representation of the Keap1–Nrf2 pathway under stressed or basal conditions. In unstressed conditions, NRF2 forms a complex with Keap1 through its DLG and ETGE motifs and subsequently undergoes ubiquitination by the Cul3‐E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, ultimately culminating in its degradation through the 26S proteasome pathway. Under oxidative or electrophilic stress, the cysteine residues within Keap1 are modified, and the activation of NRF2 can be initiated through two distinct proposed mechanisms. According to hinge‐and‐latch theory, the modifications of cysteine residues in the IVR region of Keap1, such as Cys‐288, lead to conformational changes that disrupt the binding of the DLG motif of NRF2 while keeping the ETGE motif intact with Keap1, making Cul3 inaccessible to cause ubiquitination, thus preventing the degradation of NRF2. In the Cul3 dissociation mechanism, Cys151, in particular in the BTB domain of Keap1, undergoes modification by electrophiles or oxidants, leading to the disruption of the Keap1–Cul3 complex, which prevents NRF2 ubiquitination. In both scenarios, preventing the degradation of the NRF2 pool causes an increased accumulation of the newly synthesized NRF2 molecules, which translocate to the cell nucleus. There, they engage with small Maf proteins (sMAF) and promote the transcription of NRF2 target genes through binding to antioxidant response element (ARE) sequences.
2.2. Downstream targets regulated by Nrf2 in the skin
While initially associated with oxidative stress, it is now widely recognized that Nrf2 responds to various stressors and participates in various biological processes. 26 The expression of Nrf2 target genes is highly dependent on the levels of Nrf2 protein in the skin cells. Depending on the nature and intensity of the stimuli, Nrf2 can regulate the transcription of numerous target genes in a dose‐dependent manner. Nrf2 targets expressed under normal conditions are involved in mitochondrial physiology and biogenesis, proteostasis, and metabolic reprogramming as they regulate iron and heme metabolism. In contrast, stress‐induced Nrf2 targets are rather involved in antioxidant defense, xenobiotic detoxification, inflammation and immunity regulation, DNA repair, and prevention of apoptosis. 26 , 41
To counteract the detrimental effects of reactive species in response to cellular stress, skin cells activate their antioxidant defense mechanisms, mainly coordinated by Nrf2 activity through AREs. Nrf2 induces antioxidant pathways by regulating the gene expression of a broad spectrum of antioxidant enzymes (Table 1) mainly involved in ROS neutralization, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase, and in glutathione (GSH) synthesis and regeneration. 26 , 34 Additionally, the Nrf2‐mediated defense mechanism also involves the removal of potentially harmful xenobiotics through the activation of drug‐metabolizing enzymes such as NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) and drug‐efflux transporters. 42 , 43 , 44 This process helps eliminate molecules that can generate ROS through redox cycling or deplete endogenous antioxidants by removing electrophiles. 45 Overall, the coordinated gene expression mediated by Nrf2 forms a network of enzymes involved in xenobiotic detoxification and the elimination of pro‐oxidants, which helps maintain skin homeostasis, as detailed in Table 1. Several studies have linked a lack of antioxidant enzymes or alterations in their functions to inflammatory skin conditions, suggesting a key role for oxidative stress in both skin aging and the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory skin diseases (Table 1). This dysregulation of the oxidoreductive balance can promote and exacerbate inflammation, contributing to conditions such as contact dermatitis, psoriasis, and even skin cancer. 9 , 24 , 46
TABLE 1.
Main antioxidant enzymes encoded by Nrf2 target genes, their principal function, 26 , 41 , 45 , 47 , 48 and their implications in inflammatory skin pathologies.
| Antioxidant function | Nrf2 target enzyme (enzyme abbreviation) | Enzyme's principal function | Implication in inflammatory skin diseases or conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROS neutralization | Superoxide dismutase (SOD) | Metalloenzyme that converts O2 •− into water and H2O2 |
Skin ulcer lesions (burn, wounds) 49 , 50 Allergic contact dermatitis to para‐phenylenediamine 51 Acne vulgaris 53 Skin cancer 54 |
| Catalase (CAT) | Converts H2O2 into water and oxygen |
Skin aging 57 Atopic dermatitis 21 Psoriasis vulgaris 58 |
|
| Glutathione peroxidases (GPx) | Reduce H2O2 and lipid hydroperoxides using glutathione as a cofactor |
Allergic contact dermatitis to nickel 60 Psoriasis vulgaris 58 Wound healing 50 |
|
| Peroxiredoxins (PRDX) | Reduce peroxides directly | Psoriasis 62 , 63 , 64 | |
| Thioredoxin 1 (Trx1) | Reduces oxidized protein thiols and cleaves disulfide bonds |
Allergic contact dermatitis 65 Irritant contact dermatitis 66 Psoriasis 67 UVB‐induced dermatitis 68 |
|
| Electrophiles detoxification | NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) | Reduces quinones and scavenges O2 •− | Irritant contact dermatitis 69 |
| Glutathione S‐transferases (GST) | Promotes the nucleophilic attack by glutathione on electrophilic molecules |
Atopic dermatitis 70 , 71 , 72 Psoriasis 73 |
|
| Glutathione production and antioxidant recycling | Glutamate‐cysteine ligase catalytic (GCLC) and modulator (GCLM) subunits | Catalyze the first and rate‐limiting step of glutathione biosynthesis | Psoriasis 74 |
| Glutathione synthetase | Catalyze the final step in glutathione biosynthesis | N/A | |
| Glutathione reductase (GSR) | Catalyzes the reduction of oxidized glutathione (GSSG) back to its reduced form (GSH) using NADPH as a cofactor | N/A | |
| Thioredoxin reductase 1 (TXNRD1) | A key enzyme responsible for reducing and regenerating oxidized Trx1 using NADPH | Allergic contact dermatitis to 1‐chloro‐2,4‐dinitrobenzene 75 | |
| NADPH regeneration | Glucose 6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (G6pd), 6‐phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (Pgd), isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1), and malic enzyme (Me1) | Promote NADPH production through the pentose phosphate pathway, NADPH being a cofactor for both the GSR and the thioredoxin systems | N/A |
| Heme metabolism | Heme oxygenase‐1 (HO‐1) | Catalyzes heme degradation to carbon monoxide |
Atopic dermatitis 76 Psoriasis 77 |
3. NRF2 FUNCTIONS IN THE SKIN
3.1. Role of Nrf2 in epidermal differentiation
According to the human protein Atlas, Nrf2 is ubiquitously expressed in all skin cells. 78 Interestingly, Nrf2 also plays a role in promoting KC differentiation. Increased Nrf2 accumulation during calcium‐induced differentiation has been observed, and experiments with overexpressed Nrf2 in normal human KCs have shown enhanced expression of differentiation markers, such as loricrin and keratin‐10, even in the absence of calcium. 79 The gradient of Nrf2 coincides with the apoptosis of KCs characteristic of the upper layers of the epidermis, particularly in response to ultraviolet (UV) radiation and other environmental factors. The higher expression levels of Nrf2 and the antioxidant enzymes in the skin's upper layers reinforce the epidermis antioxidant and detoxification capacity, especially as the superficial layers are more vulnerable to harmful external factors. 80
3.2. Role of Nrf2 in barrier function
Nrf2 is a direct player in the epidermal barrier function, affecting desmosome stability, corneocyte fragility, and KC proliferation. Hyperkeratosis in the esophagus and forestomach of Keap1‐deficient mice was a cause of the malnutrition that resulted in their death. Biochemical data show that in the absence of Keap1, Nrf2 accumulates constitutively in the nucleus to stimulate the transcription of cytoprotective genes. Mating with Nrf2‐deficient mice reversed the phenotypic deficiencies in Keap1. 81
It has also been shown that transgenic mice with constitutively active Nrf2 exhibit a phenotype characterized by hyperkeratosis, epidermal thickening, and inflammation resembling lamellar ichthyosis. This phenotype is associated with upregulation of differentiation markers, including loricrin, involucrin, and keratin 10, together with impaired corneocyte desquamation, leading to hyperkeratosis. 82 Nrf2 may enhance skin barrier functions by activating specific genes in epithelial tissues in response to stress. For instance, Hebner et al. showed that the absence of Loricrin led to a delay in the formation of the epidermal barrier in utero in mice. However, this delay was alleviated by the activation of Nrf2. Additionally, members of the small proline‐rich protein 2 (Sprr2) gene family, particularly sprr2d and sprr2h, have been identified as direct downstream targets of Nrf2 through ARE sequences. 83 Further investigations identified late cornified envelope 1 (Lce1) family members as target genes of Nrf2 that function in compensatory mechanisms to counteract the loss of loricrin. 84
Moreover, high levels of hypo‐phosphorylated Nrf2 were found in lesional tissue of patients with pachyonychia congenita, a rare skin disease characterized by palmoplantar keratoderma and caused by keratin 16 gene mutations. This dysfunctional Nrf2 correlated with deficient synthesis of GSH in KCs. Conversely, topical application of SFN, a pharmacological activator of Nrf2, prevented clinical lesions and normalized redox balance in keratin 16 knockout mice, suggesting a potential role for Nrf2 in epidermal differentiation and skin integrity. 85 In the same manner, previous research has shown that SFN can reprogram the expression of keratins 16 and 17, leading to the restoration of epidermal integrity in genetically modified mice with epidermolysis bullosa simplex. 86 Indeed, Nrf2 can regulate the expression of keratins 6, 16, and 17, which are linked to KC hyper‐proliferation. 87 Nrf2 also increases the expression of mi‐RNA 29 that targets desmocollin‐2, a major desmosomal component. 88
Further insights into the role of Nrf2 in the skin barrier were obtained from studying mice with a loricrin gene deletion. Loricrin, a critical component of the cornified cell envelope, is vital in maintaining skin barrier function. In loricrin knockout mice, Nrf2 activation occurs in the epidermis, leading to the overexpression of Lce1 genes. These genes encode glycine/serine‐rich proteins similar in structure to loricrin, potentially compensating for loricrin deficiency. 84 Recent findings have confirmed the coordinated action of Nrf2 and loricrin in ensuring the skin barrier cornification. In the absence of loricrin, the lack of sulfur‐rich proteins (thiols) in the epidermis disrupts the local redox balance, subsequently mobilizing the Nrf2 pathway to produce lamellar granules. 89 Genetic activation of Nrf2 in KCs of a murine model of Netherton syndrome also improved the skin barrier defect by reducing the expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and upregulating the secretory leukocyte peptidase inhibitor (SLPI), which in turn inhibited kallikrein 7 and elastase 2 and increased the attachment of the stratum corneum by stabilizing desmosomes. 90 This evidence underscores the role of Nrf2 in strengthening keratinization and promoting epidermal barrier cohesion.
The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) signaling pathway plays a critical role in breaking the vicious cycle of chronic inflammation by enhancing skin barrier function in atopic dermatitis, and this is linked to the Nrf2 pathway. At the molecular level, Nrf2 interacts with AhR, a transcription factor activated by specific chemical ligands such as dioxin and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. AhR regulates the expression of phase I metabolism enzymes (e.g., cytochrome P450 (CYPs)) and proteins involved in epidermal differentiation (e.g., filaggrin, loricrin, involucrin). 91 The interaction between Nrf2 and AhR influences the barrier function, particularly under conditions of stress or in skin diseases characterized by an impaired skin barrier, such as AD or psoriasis. To date, active ingredients such as tapinarof (topical FDA‐approved treatment of psoriasis), coal tar, and glyteer (soybean tar) reportedly exert this dual benefit activity by inducing AhR–Nrf2 pathways. 92 , 93 , 94 , 95
3.3. Role of Nrf2 in skin (photo‐)aging and photoprotection
The activation of the Nrf2 pathway has been found to protect against the acute effects of UVB and UVA radiation. 78 Genetically modified mice with increased Nrf2 expression demonstrated resistance to UV‐induced erythema and the development of precancerous lesions and squamous cell carcinoma. Meanwhile, Nrf2 deficiency exacerbates the negative effects of UV radiation on the skin. 96 , 97 Nrf2 activators, like SFN or bixin, have also shown protective effects against UV‐induced erythema and pigmentation in clinical studies with humans. 98 , 99 , 100
UV‐induced photoaging, characterized by dermal deterioration and the overproduction of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), is associated with oxidative stress. 101 The Nrf2 pathway offers advantages in this context by neutralizing ROS, reducing the “inflammaging,” 101 and alleviating fibrosis and metalloproteinase production. 102 , 103 More pronounced photoaging effects, including wrinkles, induced by UVB in Nrf2‐deficient mice have also been reported. 104 Molecular analysis has provided insights into the mechanisms by which Nrf2 provides photoprotection, including the modulation of antioxidant enzyme production, neutralization of toxic aldehydes, repair of oxidative DNA lesions, and inhibition of pro‐inflammatory cytokines. 78 Considering these findings, Nrf2 activators are promising molecules for sun and after‐sun products. 99 , 105 Evidence from the 3D skin model demonstrates that the protection against UV‐mediated damage by using skin‐derived precursor cells is primarily mediated by the activation of the Nrf2/heme oxygenase‐1 (HO‐1) pathway via the phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT). 106 Interestingly, Nrf2 also plays a role in chronological skin aging, as observed in animal models for longevity. 107 , 108
Furthermore, Nrf2 activation may lower the risk of tumor initiation and promotion by reducing mutagenic DNA lesions and dampening UV‐induced inflammation. However, caution is necessary when modulating Nrf2 in cancer treatment, as cancer cells often rely on Nrf2 for survival and resistance to apoptosis. The hyperactivation of Nrf2 in cancer cells has been associated with aggressive proliferation, 109 metastasis, 110 and resistance to chemotherapy. 111
4. NRF2 AS A MASTER REGULATOR OF SKIN INFLAMMATION
In addition to the primary function of Nrf2 as a master regulator of xenobiotic detoxification and redox homeostasis within the cells, recent investigations revealed that Nrf2 also plays an essential role in the control of the inflammatory response. 10 , 112 , 113 Persistent inflammation is a common characteristic of all pathophenotypes observed in the Nrf2 “diseasome.” 114 In particular, Nrf2 is a regulator of the skin inflammatory immune response, as several experimental studies have consistently demonstrated that Nrf2 deficiency is linked to enhanced inflammation. 115 , 116 , 117 Other data also support the role of Nrf2 in modulating the immune response. 115 Nrf2 inhibition in mice alters the phenotype of bone marrow‐derived dendritic cells. In fact, Nrf2‐deficient dendritic cells have impaired GSH levels, reduced phagocytic activity, enhanced expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II, and co‐stimulatory receptor expression of CD86 and CD80, thereby enhancing T cells stimulatory capacity. 118 Furthermore, Nrf2 disturbances have been implicated in chronic inflammatory skin diseases, such as psoriasis and AD. 119
Wound healing is a complex process involving KCs and Nrf2, particularly in managing inflammation and restoring homeostasis. Nrf2 activators have been reported as effective therapeutic approaches to promote wound healing. 120 KCs regulate the initial inflammatory phase through a rigorously coordinated network of inflammatory signaling cascades, 121 while Nrf2 mitigates inflammation and reduces ROS levels after tissue regeneration. 122 However, the expression of key factors involved in wound healing was significantly lower in the early stages of wounds in Nrf2 knockout animals, leading to prolonged inflammation in the later healing phase. Interestingly, these changes in gene expression did not result in observable histological abnormalities. This normal healing rate would be partly due to the increased expression of Nrf3, a transcription factor that is a target of keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) and coexpressed with Nrf2 in healing skin wounds. 123 Additionally, thioredoxin acts independently of glutathione to protect KC from oxidative damage. It compensates for the lack of glutathione, enabling KC to survive and thus maintain the skin's integrity and boost the healing process. 124
Although Nrf2 deficiency prolongs inflammation, it does not severely impair the duration or quality of healing in non‐diabetic wounds. However, in diabetic animals, reduced Nrf2 expression leads to increased oxidative stress and apoptosis in the perilesional area of the skin, hindering wound healing. 125 , 126 Potent Nrf2 inducers like SFN, cinnamic acid, DMF, and triterpenoid RTA‐408 offer promising therapies for accelerating diabetic wound healing by counteracting these negative effects. 127 Nrf2 signaling has also been shown to be a key event in physical plasma‐induced wound healing, promoting granulation and re‐epithelialization through a balanced antioxidant and inflammatory response. 128 Furthermore, Nrf2 is suggested to stimulate the production of CCL2 chemokine by epithelial stem cells, which mobilizes macrophages, and in particular their secretion of epidermal growth factor (EGF), promoting keratinocyte proliferation and ultimately enhancing epidermal regeneration. 129
Indirect mechanisms for counteracting inflammation involve the modulation of ROS and RNS by Nrf2. It is also appropriate to consider the role of Nrf2 in reducing inflammation by modulating redox‐sensitive key inflammatory pathways, including the Nod‐like receptor family pyrin domain‐containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome and NF‐κB, 130 and stimulating the expression of HO‐1, which has strong anti‐inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. 10
5. IMPLICATION OF NRF2 IN SKIN INFLAMMATORY DISEASES
5.1. Nrf2 in allergic contact dermatitis
ACD is a delayed‐type hypersensitivity reaction that develops in two phases following skin exposure to an allergen. The initial sensitization phase, which is asymptomatic, occurs upon first contact of the skin with the allergen and is dose‐dependent. Subsequent re‐exposure to the same allergen initiates the elicitation phase, characterized by clinical manifestations appearing 24–96 h after contact. 131 , 132 , 133 This reaction is mediated by cytotoxic CD8+ T cells and allergen‐specific effector CD4+ Th17 and Th22 cells. 134 , 135
Studies using mouse models of contact hypersensitivity demonstrate that Nrf2 regulates both the sensitization and elicitation phases of ACD. Exposure to the chemical sensitizer 2,4‐dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) induced a more severe inflammatory response in Nrf2‐deficient mice compared to wild‐type mice, highlighting Nrf2's protective role in ACD. 136 Nrf2 plays a crucial role in chemical‐induced innate skin immunity, particularly during the sensitization phase, by modulating neutrophil recruitment and accumulation. 137 Indeed, Nrf2 regulates chemokine production, such as CCL‐2, CCL‐4, and CCL‐11, and enhances macrophage phagocytosis, mainly via increased expression of CD36 scavenger receptor expression, a process independent of Nrf2's antioxidant function. The enhanced macrophage phagocytosis promotes efficient neutrophil clearance, and resolution of inflammation. 137 Further supporting Nrf2's anti‐inflammatory role, another study showed that Nrf2 controls pro‐inflammatory cytokine production in human KCs exposed to cinnamaldehyde, a well‐known skin sensitizer. 138
5.2. Nrf2 in atopic dermatitis
AD is a chronic, Th2‐driven inflammatory skin disease affecting a significant portion of the population. 139 , 140 Characterized by recurrent, itchy, eczematous lesions, AD is typically easily diagnosed clinically. 141 The disease is multifactorial, involving genetic predisposition, impaired skin barrier integrity, environmental exposures, and microbiome disruptions. 142 Defects in the filaggrin FLG and FLG2 genes, as well as in loricrin and involucrin, are the most common gene mutations associated with AD, resulting in altered envelope and moisturization issues. 143 , 144 Defective genes involving small proline‐rich protein 3 (SPRR3), tight junctions (CLDN1), and protease inhibitors (SPINK5) have also been noted in AD. 142 These gene mutations lead to a compromised skin barrier, allowing penetration of natural environmental allergens (e.g., house dust mites, pollens) and pollutants, which are reported to trigger AD exacerbations. 145
Several research studies highlight the role of Nrf2 in the pathogenesis and treatment of AD. Loricrin deficiency in mice triggers Nrf2 activation, leading to overexpression of late cornified envelope 1 (Lce1) genes, which encode loricrin‐like proteins, likely compensating for the missing loricrin and restoring the redox balance disrupted by the lack of loricrin's sulfur‐rich components. These data confirm the coordinated roles of Nrf2 and loricrin in skin barrier integrity. 146
Nrf2 has been shown to ameliorate AD‐like skin manifestations and type 2 immunity exacerbation through its antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory effects. 119 , 147 A recent quantitative proteomics study identified a reduced Nrf2 activity and mitochondrial dysfunction in lesional and non‐lesional AD skin, together with a protein profile reflecting inflammation and impaired KC differentiation and epidermal stratification. 148 In fact, the AD skin is subjected to oxidative stress, resulting in the repair‐associated type 2 immunity response 149 and impaired Nrf2 activity due to physical damage in the epidermis. 148 The former reflects the skin's attempt to recover from minor trauma, while the latter is associated with impaired tissue response and KC cell death in eczematous reactions. These data support the use of Nrf2 inducers, such as bixin (apocarotenoid) in the treatment of AD. 99 , 119 Bioactive natural compounds have also demonstrated efficacy in reducing AD symptoms. For instance, Veronica persica extract (EEVP) improved the symptoms in a DNCB‐induced AD‐like mice model by decreasing inflammatory cytokine levels such as IFN‐γ, IL‐4, IL‐5, and IL‐13. It has also been demonstrated that EEVP has a high affinity for binding to Keap1, leading to Nrf2 activation, which in turn induces the expression of NQO1 and HO‐1. 150 Similarly, ursolic acid, a triterpenoid compound found in plants, alleviated DNCB‐induced AD symptoms in mice, reducing dermatitis score and ear thickness, and inhibiting skin proliferation and mast cell infiltration. Ursolic acid was found to inhibit the Toll‐like receptor 4/NF‐κB pathway while simultaneously activating the Nrf2/HO‐1 pathway. 151 Phototherapies, including photobiomodulation (PBM) have demonstrated an ability to modulate immune responses and reduce oxidative stress markers. 152 , 153 PBM, using low levels of visible red light (660 nm) or near‐infrared radiation (520 nm), effectively decreased TNF‐α, IL‐6, and IL‐8 mRNA expression while enhancing Nrf2 pathway activation in DNCB‐stimulated human KCs. 154 This study highlights the Nrf2‐dependent anti‐inflammatory mechanism of PBM, suggesting its potential as a complementary AD treatment.
However, the role of Nrf2 in AD is complex. In a mouse model mimicking AD symptoms, short‐term pharmacological Nrf2 activation provided mild protection, but prolonged genetic activation of Nrf2 in murine KCs exacerbated skin inflammation, causing hyperkeratosis, epidermal thickening, increased KC apoptosis, DNA damage, and altered immune cell composition, highlighting the need for carefully controlled Nrf2 activation in AD treatment. 155
5.3. Nrf2 in psoriasis
Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease affecting around 120 million people globally, with adult prevalence ranging from 0.2% to 2.3% depending on the region. 156 Although classified as an auto‐inflammatory and autoimmune disease, its exact mechanism of development remains unclear. 157 It is commonly accepted that environmental and internal factors, such as stress and Streptococcus infections, 158 as well as physical injury 159 and certain drugs such as beta‐blockers or lithium 160 , 161 can trigger or exacerbate the psoriatic immune process in genetically susceptible individuals, particularly those carrying the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)‐class 1, HLA‐C*06:02 allele. 162
The pathogenesis of psoriasis involves two main skin disruptions. On one hand, psoriasis is primarily driven by the dysregulation of the skin's immune barrier with a dense infiltrate of immune cells into the skin. It is well established that KCs are responsible for psoriasis early immune pathogenic events by producing autoantigens such as LL‐37 and keratin 17, initiating cutaneous inflammation. 8 , 163 KCs also potentiate inflammation in response to stimuli or damage by activating both innate and adaptive immunity. It has been shown that KCs could induce the differentiation of T cells into Th1 and Th17 cells through direct cell–cell contact in the absence of antigen‐presenting cells. 164 Furthermore, KCs amplify the inflammation through PRRs activation and the production of antimicrobial peptides and pro‐inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, such as IL‐1 family, TNF‐α, IL‐6, IL‐8, CXCL1, CXCL10, and CCL20. 165 Innate immune cells also contribute to psoriatic inflammation by producing cytokines like TNF‐α, IL‐17, IL‐22, and IL‐23 that trigger KC proliferation, maintain a pro‐inflammatory environment, and lead to the subsequent T cell activation. On the other hand, psoriasis pathogenesis also involves physical barrier dysfunction arising from KC hyperproliferation (hyperkeratosis and acanthosis), incomplete KC differentiation in the stratum corneum, and disruption of intercellular junctions and the lipid‐rich matrix. 166
The role of Nrf2 in psoriasis is controversial. Some studies suggest Nrf2 activation promotes KC hyperproliferation initially observed in HaCaT cells and later confirmed in a mouse model. In fact, HaCat cells stimulated by proinflammatory cytokines, IL‐17 and IL‐22, showed an increased Nrf2 accumulation and subsequent induction of keratin expression such as keratin 6, 16, and 17, contributing to hyperkeratinization that could be observed in psoriasis. Whereas in an IMQ‐induced psoriasis‐like mouse model, researchers found that inhibiting Nrf2 using small interfering RNA (siRNA) abolished the expression of keratins 6, 16, and 17, improving epidermal hyperplasia lesions. 87 , 167
Conversely, other evidence suggests a protective role for Nrf2 in psoriasis. The application of the Nrf2 activator, DMF, attenuates psoriatic lesions and restores epidermal differentiation in Nrf2 +/+ mice, an effect absent in Nrf2‐deficient mice. 168 DMF's mechanism likely involves upregulating GSH and NQO1, and modifying Keap1 cysteine residues to activate Nrf2. 157 , 169 Other bioactive natural compounds have also shown promise in alleviating psoriasis. SFN is known to have anti‐inflammatory, antibacterial, and antioxidant properties. 170 A study demonstrates SFN's therapeutic potential in preclinical models of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, including IMQ‐induced psoriasis‐like mice and lupus‐like MRL/Lpr mice. Its observed effects, such as reducing inflammatory and autoimmune‐related cells and mitigating oxidative stress, suggest a possible mechanism involving Nrf2 activation, given SFN's known role as a potent Nrf2 inducer. 63 Ma et al. have shown a deficiency of Nrf2 in the IMQ‐induced psoriatic mouse model. However, SFN seems to restore the expression of Nrf2 while decreasing keratins expression (K6/K16/K17), thus alleviating the psoriatic phenotype. 171 Moreover, galangin, an active flavonoid extract from Propolis, Alpinia officinarum and Alpina galanga, seems to have a therapeutic potential in psoriasis with anti‐inflammatory and antioxidant properties. 172 It has been shown that galangin promotes the Nrf2 pathway and attenuates oxidative damage and inflammation in rat's hepatic cells by increasing the expression of the antioxidative enzymes NQO1 and HO‐1. 173 The 3H‐1,2‐dithiole‐3‐thione molecule (D3T) has also demonstrated an effective impact in reducing the thickening and scaling of IMQ‐induced psoriatic mice. 174
5.4. Nrf2 in chloracne
Chloracne, a severe skin condition characterized by acne‐like eruptions and cysts, is often associated with exposure to halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons like dioxins. Interestingly, while Nrf2 activation is generally considered beneficial for the skin due to its antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory effects, excessive or prolonged Nrf2 activation can paradoxically contribute to skin pathologies resembling chloracne. Studies have shown that genetic and pharmacological Nrf2 activation in murine KCs induces pronounced acanthosis and hyperkeratosis, mimicking lamellar ichthyosis. 82 This is driven by Nrf2‐mediated overexpression of secretory leukocyte peptidase inhibitor (Slpi) and small proline‐rich protein 2d (Sprr2d). Although these proteins are typically associated with Nrf2's anti‐inflammatory function, their upregulation also causes cornified envelope instability and interferes with corneocyte desquamation. Furthermore, sustained Nrf2 activation in the skin can lead to sebaceous gland hypertrophy, seborrhea, and follicular hyperkeratosis, ultimately resulting in dilated infundibula, hair loss, and cyst formation—a phenotype similar to that observed in chloracne. 175 This is attributed to increased expression of Nrf2 target genes, particularly epigen (a growth factor), Slpi, and Sprr2d. These proteins are also upregulated by dioxin in human KCs in an Nrf2‐dependent manner, further implicating Nrf2 in chloracne pathogenesis. The pathogenesis of dioxin‐induced chloracne involves activation of the AhR‐cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) system, oxidative stress generation, and hyperkeratinization of KCs and sebocytes. 176 , 177 Importantly, a reciprocal relationship exists between AhR and Nrf2, involving both direct and indirect interactions. Nrf2 can directly bind to the AhR promoter, increasing AhR mRNA transcription, while AhR can bind to an XRE within the Nrf2 promoter, enhancing Nrf2 mRNA transcription. 178 , 179 Indirectly, AhR ligands metabolized by AhR‐induced CYPs generate oxidative stress intermediates, subsequently activating Nrf2. 180 , 181 In Yusho patients intoxicated with high dioxin levels, the cinnamaldehyde‐containing Kampo herbal medicine has shown efficacy in improving chloracne, likely by activating the Nrf2 pathway and inhibiting AhR‐CYP1A1 signaling, highlighting the complex interplay between these pathways in skin pathologies. 182
6. CONCLUSION
The skin, a complex organ composed predominantly of KCs, relies on an intricate network of immune cells and signaling pathways to maintain homeostasis and defend against external threats. KCs play a dual role, forming the physical barrier and actively participating in the skin immune responses. Disruptions to this delicate balance, whether due to genetic predisposition or environmental aggressions, can contribute to inflammatory skin conditions like ACD, AD, and psoriasis. As described in the present review, the transcription factor Nrf2 emerges as a critical player in skin health and disease. It orchestrates antioxidant responses, detoxifies harmful substances under stressful conditions, modulates epidermal differentiation, and regulates the skin immune function. Nrf2 deficiency is frequently associated with pathological inflammatory states and increased vulnerability to stressors, while Nrf2 activation, through natural or synthetic compounds, offers promising therapeutic potential for mitigating inflammation and alleviating symptoms in various skin inflammatory disorders. However, the complex and context‐dependent nature of Nrf2 highlights a crucial aspect: while generally beneficial, excessive Nrf2 activation can paradoxically induce chloracne‐like pathologies due to the upregulation of some of its target genes. Therefore, further research is needed to fully understand these mechanisms and develop safe and effective Nrf2‐targeted therapeutic strategies. Carefully titrating Nrf2 activity would maximize therapeutic benefits while minimizing risks.
FUNDING INFORMATION
This work was supported by a grant from the ANRT (Association Nationale de Recherche et de Technologie).
Salman S, Paulet V, Hardonnière K, Kerdine‐Römer S. The role of NRF2 transcription factor in inflammatory skin diseases. BioFactors. 2025;51(2):e70013. 10.1002/biof.70013
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
REFERENCES
- 1. Bernard F‐X, Morel F, Camus M, Pedretti N, Barrault C, Garnier J, et al. Keratinocytes under fire of proinflammatory cytokines: Bona fide innate immune cells involved in the physiopathology of chronic atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. J Allergy (Cairo). 2012;2012:718725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Jiang Y, Tsoi LC, Billi AC, Ward NL, Harms PW, Zeng C, et al. Cytokinocytes: the diverse contribution of keratinocytes to immune responses in skin. JCI Insight. 2020;5(20):e142067. 10.1172/jci.insight.142067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bäsler K, Brandner JM. Tight junctions in skin inflammation. Pflugers Arch ‐ Eur J Physiol. 2017;469(1):3–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Sawada Y, Saito‐Sasaki N, Mashima E, Nakamura M. Daily lifestyle and inflammatory skin diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(10):5204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Chambers ES, Vukmanovic‐Stejic M. Skin barrier immunity and ageing. Immunology. 2020;160(2):116–125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Richmond JM, Harris JE. Immunology and skin in health and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;4(12):a015339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Pasparakis M, Haase I, Nestle FO. Mechanisms regulating skin immunity and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(5):289–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ni X, Lai Y. Crosstalk between keratinocytes and immune cells in inflammatory skin diseases. Explor Immunol. 2021;1(5):418–431. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Nakai K, Tsuruta D. What are reactive oxygen species, free radicals, and oxidative stress in skin diseases? Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(19):10799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Saha S, Buttari B, Panieri E, Profumo E, Saso L. An overview of Nrf2 signaling pathway and its role in inflammation. Molecules. 2020;25(22):5474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Yamamoto M, Kensler TW, Motohashi H. The KEAP1‐NRF2 system: a thiol‐based sensor‐effector apparatus for maintaining redox homeostasis. Physiol Rev. 2018;98(3):1169–1203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ali SS, Ahsan H, Zia MK, Siddiqui T, Khan FH. Understanding oxidants and antioxidants: classical team with new players. J Food Biochem. 2020;44(3):e13145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Korkina L, Pastore S. The role of redox regulation in the normal physiology and inflammatory diseases of skin. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2009;1(1):123–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Giles GI, Nasim MJ, Ali W, Jacob C. The reactive sulfur species concept: 15 years on. Antioxidants. 2017;6(2):38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. González S, Aguilera J, Berman B, Calzavara‐Pinton P, Gilaberte Y, Goh C‐L, et al. Expert recommendations on the evaluation of sunscreen efficacy and the beneficial role of non‐filtering ingredients. Front Med. 2022;9:790207. 10.3389/fmed.2022.790207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Le Gal K, Schmidt EE, Sayin VI. Cellular redox homeostasis. Antioxidants Basel. 2021;10(9):1377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Amin MN, Liza KF, Sarwar MS, Ahmed J, Adnan MT, Chowdhury MI, et al. Effect of lipid peroxidation, antioxidants, macro minerals and trace elements on eczema. Arch Dermatol Res. 2015;307(7):617–623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ji H, Li X‐K. Oxidative stress in atopic dermatitis. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:e2721469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Leveque N, Robin S, Muret P, Mac‐Mary S, Makki S, Humbert P. High iron and low ascorbic acid concentrations in the dermis of atopic dermatitis patients. Dermatology. 2003;207(3):261–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Nakai K, Yoneda K, Maeda R, Munehiro A, Fujita N, Yokoi I, et al. Urinary biomarker of oxidative stress in patients with psoriasis vulgaris and atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23(12):1405–1408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Sivaranjani N, Rao SV, Rajeev G. Role of reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in atopic dermatitis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(12):2683–2685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Sirsjö A, Karlsson M, Gidöf A, Rollman O, Törmä H. Increased expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in psoriatic skin and cytokine‐stimulated cultured keratinocytes. Br J Dermatol. 1996;134(4):643–648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Mehling R, Schwenck J, Lemberg C, Trautwein C, Zizmare L, Kramer D, et al. Immunomodulatory role of reactive oxygen species and nitrogen species during T cell‐driven neutrophil‐enriched acute and chronic cutaneous delayed‐type hypersensitivity reactions. Theranostics. 2021;11(2):470–490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Liu H‐M, Cheng M‐Y, Xun M‐H, Zhao Z‐W, Zhang Y, Tang W, et al. Possible mechanisms of oxidative stress‐induced skin cellular senescence, inflammation, and cancer and the therapeutic potential of plant polyphenols. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(4):3755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Biswas SK. Does the interdependence between oxidative stress and inflammation explain the antioxidant paradox? Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:e5698931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. He F, Ru X, Wen T. NRF2, a transcription factor for stress response and beyond. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(13):4777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Bellezza I, Giambanco I, Minelli A, Donato R. Nrf2‐Keap1 signaling in oxidative and reductive stress. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2018;1865(5):721–733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Huang Y, Li W, Su Z, Kong A‐NT. The complexity of the Nrf2 pathway: beyond the antioxidant response. J Nutr Biochem. 2015;26(12):1401–1413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Itoh K, Wakabayashi N, Katoh Y, Ishii T, Igarashi K, Engel JD, et al. Keap1 represses nuclear activation of antioxidant responsive elements by Nrf2 through binding to the amino‐terminal Neh2 domain. Genes Dev. 1999;13(1):76–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Dayalan Naidu S, Muramatsu A, Saito R, Asami S, Honda T, Hosoya T, et al. C151 in KEAP1 is the main cysteine sensor for the cyanoenone class of NRF2 activators, irrespective of molecular size or shape. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):8037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kobayashi A, Kang M‐I, Okawa H, Ohtsuji M, Zenke Y, Chiba T, et al. Oxidative stress sensor Keap1 functions as an adaptor for Cul3‐based E3 ligase to regulate proteasomal degradation of Nrf2. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(16):7130–7139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. McMahon M, Lamont DJ, Beattie KA, Hayes JD. Keap1 perceives stress via three sensors for the endogenous signaling molecules nitric oxide, zinc, and alkenals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(44):18838–18843. 10.1073/pnas.1007387107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Saito R, Suzuki T, Hiramoto K, Asami S, Naganuma E, Suda H, et al. Characterizations of three major cysteine sensors of Keap1 in stress response. Mol Cell Biol. 2016;36(2):271–284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Baird L, Yamamoto M. The molecular mechanisms regulating the KEAP1‐NRF2 pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2020;40(13):e00099‐20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Tonelli C, Chio IIC, Tuveson DA. Transcriptional regulation by Nrf2. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2018;29(17):1727–1745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Horie Y, Suzuki T, Inoue J, Iso T, Wells G, Moore TW, et al. Molecular basis for the disruption of Keap1‐Nrf2 interaction via Hinge & Latch mechanism. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Suzuki T, Yamamoto M. Molecular basis of the Keap1–Nrf2 system. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;88:93–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Liu T, Lv Y‐F, Zhao J‐L, You Q‐D, Jiang Z‐Y. Regulation of Nrf2 by phosphorylation: consequences for biological function and therapeutic implications. Free Radic Biol Med. 2021;168:129–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Katsuoka F, Motohashi H, Ishii T, Aburatani H, Engel JD, Yamamoto M. Genetic evidence that small Maf proteins are essential for the activation of antioxidant response element‐dependent genes. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(18):8044–8051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Motohashi H, Katsuoka F, Engel JD, Yamamoto M. Small Maf proteins serve as transcriptional cofactors for keratinocyte differentiation in the Keap1‐Nrf2 regulatory pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(17):6379–6384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Dodson M, de la Vega MR, Cholanians AB, Schmidlin CJ, Chapman E, Zhang DD. Modulating NRF2 in disease: timing is everything. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019;59:555–575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Maher JM, Dieter MZ, Aleksunes LM, Slitt AL, Guo G, Tanaka Y, et al. Oxidative and electrophilic stress induces multidrug resistance‐associated protein transporters via the nuclear factor‐E2‐related factor‐2 transcriptional pathway. Hepatology. 2007;46(5):1597–1610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Jung K‐A, Choi B‐H, Nam C‐W, Song M, Kim S‐T, Lee JY, et al. Identification of aldo‐keto reductases as NRF2‐target marker genes in human cells. Toxicol Lett. 2013;218(1):39–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Ross D, Siegel D. The diverse functionality of NQO1 and its roles in redox control. Redox Biol. 2021;41:101950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Tebay LE, Robertson H, Durant ST, Vitale SR, Penning TM, Dinkova‐Kostova AT, et al. Mechanisms of activation of the transcription factor Nrf2 by redox stressors, nutrient cues, and energy status and the pathways through which it attenuates degenerative disease. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;88:108–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Anik MI, Mahmud N, Masud AA, Khan MI, Islam MN, Uddin S, et al. Role of reactive oxygen species in aging and age‐related diseases: a review. ACS Appl Biol Mater. 2022;5(9):4028–4054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Hayes JD, Dinkova‐Kostova AT. The Nrf2 regulatory network provides an interface between redox and intermediary metabolism. Trends Biochem Sci. 2014;39(4):199–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Tu W, Wang H, Li S, Liu Q, Sha H. The anti‐inflammatory and anti‐oxidant mechanisms of the Keap1/Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway in chronic diseases. Aging Dis. 2019;10(3):637–651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Niwa Y. Lipid peroxides and superoxide dismutase (SOD) induction in skin inflammatory diseases, and treatment with SOD preparations. Dermatologica. 1989;179(Suppl 1):101–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Ou Q, Zhang S, Fu C, Yu L, Xin P, Gu Z, et al. More natural more better: triple natural anti‐oxidant puerarin/ferulic acid/polydopamine incorporated hydrogel for wound healing. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19(1):237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Brans R, Dickel H, Bruckner T, Coenraads P‐J, Heesen M, Merk HF, et al. MnSOD polymorphisms in sensitized patients with delayed‐type hypersensitivity reactions to the chemical allergen para‐phenylene diamine: a case–control study. Toxicology. 2005;212(2):148–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Minzaghi D, Pavel P, Kremslehner C, Gruber F, Oberreiter S, Hagenbuchner J, et al. Excessive production of hydrogen peroxide in mitochondria contributes to atopic dermatitis. J Investig Dermatol. 2023;143(10):1906–1918.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Kurutas EB, Arican O, Sasmaz S. Superoxide dismutase and myeloperoxidase activities in polymorphonuclear leukocytes in acne vulgaris. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat. 2005;14(2):39–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Kobayashi T, Matsumoto M, Iizuka H, Suzuki K, Taniguchi N. Superoxide dismutase in psoriasis, squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell epithelioma: an immunohistochemical study. Br J Dermatol. 1991;124(6):555–559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Ines D, Sonia B, Riadh BM, Amel EG, Slaheddine M, Hamida T, et al. A comparative study of oxidant–antioxidant status in stable and active vitiligo patients. Arch Dermatol Res. 2006;298(4):147–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Yildirim M, Baysal V, Inaloz H, Can M. The role of oxidants and antioxidants in generalized vitiligo at tissue level. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2004;18(6):683–686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Shin MH, Rhie G, Kim YK, Park C‐H, Cho KH, Kim KH, et al. H2O2 accumulation by catalase reduction changes MAP kinase signaling in aged human skin in vivo. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(5):221–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Drewa G, Krzyzyńska‐Malinowska E, Woźniak A, Protas‐Drozd F, Mila‐Kierzenkowska C, Rozwodowska M, et al. Activity of superoxide dismutase and catalase and the level of lipid peroxidation products reactive with TBA in patients with psoriasis. Med Sci Monit. 2002;8(8):BR338–BR343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Kostović K, Pastar Z, Pasić A, Ceović R. Treatment of vitiligo with narrow‐band UVB and topical gel containing catalase and superoxide dismutase. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2007;15(1):10–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Kaur S, Zilmer M, Eisen M, Rehema A, Kullisaar T, Vihalemm T, et al. Nickel sulphate and epoxy resin: differences in iron status and glutathione redox ratio at the time of patch testing. Arch Dermatol Res. 2004;295(12):517–520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Xiao B‐H, Shi M, Chen H, Cui S, Wu Y, Gao X‐H, et al. Glutathione peroxidase level in patients with vitiligo: a meta‐analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:3029810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Besgen P, Trommler P, Vollmer S, Prinz JC. Ezrin, Maspin, peroxiredoxin 2, and heat shock protein 27: potential targets of a streptococcal‐induced autoimmune response in psoriasis. J Immunol. 2010;184(9):5392–5402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Du P, Zhang W, Cui H, He W, Lu S, Jia S, et al. Sulforaphane ameliorates the severity of psoriasis and SLE by modulating effector cells and reducing oxidative stress. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:805508. 10.3389/fphar.2022.805508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Han Y‐H, Feng L, Lee S‐J, Zhang Y‐Q, Wang A‐G, Jin M‐H, et al. Depletion of peroxiredoxin II promotes keratinocyte apoptosis and alleviates psoriatic skin lesions via the PI3K/AKT/GSK3β signaling axis. Cell Death Discov. 2023;9(1):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Fukunaga A, Horikawa T, Ogura K, Taguchi K, Yu X, Funasaka Y, et al. Thioredoxin suppresses the contact hypersensitivity response by inhibiting leukocyte recruitment during the elicitation phase. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;11(6):1227–1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Tian H, Matsuo Y, Fukunaga A, Ono R, Nishigori C, Yodoi J. Thioredoxin ameliorates cutaneous inflammation by regulating the epithelial production and release of pro‐inflammatory cytokines. Front Immunol. 2013;4:269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Mostafa A, Sakurai K, Murata T, Dainichi T, Tian H, Yodoi J, et al. Recombinant human thioredoxin ameliorates imiquimod‐induced psoriasis‐like dermatitis in mice. J Dermatol Sci. 2024;116(1):55–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Ono R, Masaki T, Dien S, Yu X, Fukunaga A, Yodoi J, et al. Suppressive effect of recombinant human thioredoxin on ultraviolet light‐induced inflammation and apoptosis in murine skin. J Dermatol. 2012;39(10):843–851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Kitajima M, Kimura A, Suzuki H. Cutting edge: Nqo1 regulates irritant contact hypersensitivity against croton oil through maintenance of dendritic epidermal T cells. J Immunol. 2018;200(5):1555–1559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Vavilin VA, Safronova OG, Lyapunova AA, Lyakhovich VV, Kaznacheeva LF, Manankin NA, et al. Interaction of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 genotypes in determination of predisposition to atopic dermatitis. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2003;136(4):388–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Cho H‐R, Uhm Y‐K, Kim H‐J, Ban J‐Y, Chung J‐H, Yim S‐V, et al. Glutathione S‐transferase M1 (GSTM1) polymorphism is associated with atopic dermatitis susceptibility in a Korean population. Int J Immunogenet. 2011;38(2):145–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Wen H‐J, Wang S‐L, Chen P‐C, Guo YL. Prenatal perfluorooctanoic acid exposure and glutathione s‐transferase T1/M1 genotypes and their association with atopic dermatitis at 2 years of age. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0210708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Guarneri F, Sapienza D, Papaianni V, Marafioti I, Guarneri C, Mondello C, et al. Association between genetic polymorphisms of glutathione S‐transferase M1/T1 and psoriasis in a population from the area of the strict of messina (southern Italy). Free Radic Res. 2020;54(1):57–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Efanova E, Bushueva O, Saranyuk R, Surovtseva A, Churnosov M, Solodilova M, et al. Polymorphisms of the GCLC gene are novel genetic markers for susceptibility to psoriasis associated with alcohol abuse and cigarette smoking. Life (Basel). 2023;13(6):1316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Nordberg J, Zhong L, Holmgren A, Arnér ES. Mammalian thioredoxin reductase is irreversibly inhibited by dinitrohalobenzenes by alkylation of both the redox active selenocysteine and its neighboring cysteine residue. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(18):10835–10842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Kirino M, Kirino Y, Takeno M, Nagashima Y, Takahashi K, Kobayashi M, et al. Heme oxygenase 1 attenuates the development of atopic dermatitis‐like lesions in mice: implications for human disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122(2):290–297.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Campbell NK, Fitzgerald HK, Malara A, Hambly R, Sweeney CM, Kirby B, et al. Naturally derived heme‐oxygenase 1 inducers attenuate inflammatory responses in human dendritic cells and T cells: relevance for psoriasis treatment. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Kahremany S, Hofmann L, Gruzman A, Dinkova‐Kostova AT, Cohen G. NRF2 in dermatological disorders: pharmacological activation for protection against cutaneous photodamage and photodermatosis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2022;188:262–276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Lee Y, Shin J‐M, Jang S, Choi D‐K, Seo M‐S, Kim H‐R, et al. Role of nuclear factor E2‐related factor 2 (Nrf2) in epidermal differentiation. Arch Dermatol Res. 2014;306(7):677–682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Schäfer M, Werner S. Nrf2—a regulator of keratinocyte redox signaling. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;88(Pt B):243–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Wakabayashi N, Itoh K, Wakabayashi J, Motohashi H, Noda S, Takahashi S, et al. Keap1‐null mutation leads to postnatal lethality due to constitutive Nrf2 activation. Nat Genet. 2003;35(3):238–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Schäfer M, Farwanah H, Willrodt A‐H, Huebner AJ, Sandhoff K, Roop D, et al. Nrf2 links epidermal barrier function with antioxidant defense. EMBO Mol Med. 2012;4(5):364–379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Huebner AJ, Dai D, Morasso M, Schmidt EE, Schäfer M, Werner S, et al. Amniotic fluid activates the Nrf2/keap1 pathway to repair an epidermal barrier defect in utero. Dev Cell. 2012;23(6):1238–1246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Ishitsuka Y, Huebner AJ, Rice RH, Koch PJ, Speransky VV, Steven AC, et al. Lce1 family members are Nrf2‐target genes that are induced to compensate for the loss of loricrin. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(8):1656–1663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Kerns ML, Hakim JMC, Lu RG, Guo Y, Berroth A, Kaspar RL, et al. Oxidative stress and dysfunctional NRF2 underlie pachyonychia congenita phenotypes. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(6):2356–2366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Kerns M, DePianto D, Yamamoto M, Coulombe P. Differential modulation of keratin expression by sulforaphane occurs via Nrf2‐dependent and ‐independent pathways in skin epithelia. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21:4068–4075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Yang L, Fan X, Cui T, Dang E, Wang G. Nrf2 promotes keratinocyte proliferation in psoriasis through up‐regulation of keratin 6, keratin 16, and keratin 17. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(10):2168–2176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Kurinna S, Schäfer M, Ostano P, Karouzakis E, Chiorino G, Bloch W, et al. A novel Nrf2‐miR‐29‐desmocollin‐2 axis regulates desmosome function in keratinocytes. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Ishitsuka Y, Ogawa T, Nakamura Y, Kubota N, Fujisawa Y, Watanabe R, et al. Loricrin and NRF2 coordinate cornification. JID Innov. 2022;2(1):100065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Muzumdar S, Koch M, Hiebert H, Bapst A, Gravina A, Bloch W, et al. Genetic activation of Nrf2 reduces cutaneous symptoms in a murine model of Netherton syndrome. Dis Model Mech. 2020;13(5):dmm042648. 10.1242/dmm.042648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Furue M. Regulation of filaggrin, loricrin, and Involucrin by IL‐4, IL‐13, IL‐17A, IL‐22, AHR, and NRF2: pathogenic implications in atopic dermatitis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(15):5382. 10.3390/ijms21155382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Hwang J, Newton EM, Hsiao J, Shi VY. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor/nuclear factor E2‐related factor 2 (AHR/NRF2) signalling: a novel therapeutic target for atopic dermatitis. Exp Dermatol. 2022;31(4):485–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Nogueira S, Rodrigues MA, Vender R, Torres T. Tapinarof for the treatment of psoriasis. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(12):e15931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Takemura M, Nakahara T, Hashimoto‐Hachiya A, Furue M, Tsuji G. Glyteer, soybean tar, impairs IL‐4/Stat6 signaling in murine bone marrow‐derived dendritic cells: the basis of its therapeutic effect on atopic dermatitis. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(4):1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. van den Bogaard EH, Bergboer JGM, Vonk‐Bergers M, van Vlijmen‐Willems IMJJ, Hato SV, van der Valk PGM, et al. Coal tar induces AHR‐dependent skin barrier repair in atopic dermatitis. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(2):917–927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Saw CLL, Yang AY, Huang M‐T, Liu Y, Lee JH, Khor TO, et al. Nrf2 null enhances UVB‐induced skin inflammation and extracellular matrix damages. Cell Biosci. 2014;4(1):39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Schäfer M, Dütsch S, dem auf Keller U, Navid F, Schwarz A, Johnson DA, et al. Nrf2 establishes a glutathione‐mediated gradient of UVB cytoprotection in the epidermis. Genes Dev. 2010;24(10):1045–1058. 10.1101/gad.568810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Kerns ML, Miller RJ, Mazhar M, Byrd AS, Archer NK, Pinkser BL, et al. Pathogenic and therapeutic role for NRF2 signaling in ultraviolet light‐induced skin pigmentation. JCI Insight. 2020;5(20):e139342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Rojo de la Vega M, Krajisnik A, Zhang DD, Wondrak GT. Targeting NRF2 for improved skin barrier function and photoprotection: focus on the achiote‐derived apocarotenoid bixin. Nutrients. 2017;9(12):1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Talalay P, Fahey JW, Healy ZR, Wehage SL, Benedict AL, Min C, et al. Sulforaphane mobilizes cellular defenses that protect skin against damage by UV radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(44):17500–17505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Pilkington SM, Bulfone‐Paus S, Griffiths CEM, Watson REB. Inflammaging and the skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141(4, Supplement):1087–1095. 10.1016/j.jid.2020.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Chaiprasongsuk A, Lohakul J, Soontrapa K, Sampattavanich S, Akarasereenont P, Panich U. Activation of Nrf2 reduces UVA‐mediated MMP‐1 upregulation via MAPK/AP‐1 signaling cascades: the photoprotective effects of sulforaphane and hispidulin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2017;360(3):388–398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Wu R, Zhang H, Zhao M, Li J, Hu Y, Fu J, et al. Nrf2 in keratinocytes protects against skin fibrosis via regulating epidermal lesion and inflammatory response. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020;174:113846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Hirota A, Kawachi Y, Yamamoto M, Koga T, Hamada K, Otsuka F. Acceleration of UVB‐induced photoageing in Nrf2 gene‐deficient mice. Exp Dermatol. 2011;20(8):664–668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Frantz M‐C, Rozot R, Marrot L. NRF2 in dermo‐cosmetic: from scientific knowledge to skin care products. Biofactors. 2023;49(1):32–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Xian D, Xiong X, Xu J, Xian L, Lei Q, Song J, et al. Nrf2 overexpression for the protective effect of skin‐derived precursors against UV‐induced damage: evidence from a three‐dimensional skin model. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:e7021428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Michalak M. Plant‐derived antioxidants: significance in skin health and the ageing process. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(2):585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Yu C, Xiao J‐H. The Keap1‐Nrf2 system: a mediator between oxidative stress and aging. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021:6635460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Okazaki K, Papagiannakopoulos T, Motohashi H. Metabolic features of cancer cells in NRF2 addiction status. Biophys Rev. 2020;12(2):435–441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Lignitto L, LeBoeuf SE, Homer H, Jiang S, Askenazi M, Karakousi TR, et al. Nrf2 activation promotes lung cancer metastasis by inhibiting the degradation of Bach1. Cell. 2019;178(2):316–329.e18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Jeong Y, Hellyer JA, Stehr H, Hoang NT, Niu X, Das M, et al. Role of KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutations in the chemotherapeutic response of patients with non‐small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(1):274–281. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Keleku‐Lukwete N, Suzuki M, Yamamoto M. An overview of the advantages of KEAP1‐NRF2 system activation during inflammatory disease treatment. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2018;29(17):1746–1755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Kim J, Cha Y‐N, Surh Y‐J. A protective role of nuclear factor‐erythroid 2‐related factor‐2 (Nrf2) in inflammatory disorders. Mutat Res. 2010;690(1):12–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Cuadrado A, Manda G, Hassan A, Alcaraz MJ, Barbas C, Daiber A, et al. Transcription factor NRF2 as a therapeutic target for chronic diseases: a systems medicine approach. Pharmacol Rev. 2018;70(2):348–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Gęgotek A, Skrzydlewska E. The role of transcription factor Nrf2 in skin cells metabolism. Arch Dermatol Res. 2015;307(5):385–396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Helou DG, Martin SF, Pallardy M, Chollet‐Martin S, Kerdine‐Römer S. Nrf2 involvement in chemical‐induced skin innate immunity. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Vallion R, Kerdine‐Römer S. Regulation of the immune response to contact sensitizers by Nrf2. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;87(1):13–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Yeang HXA, Hamdam JM, Al‐Huseini LMA, Sethu S, Djouhri L, Walsh J, et al. Loss of transcription factor nuclear factor‐erythroid 2 (NF‐E2) p45‐related factor‐2 (Nrf2) leads to dysregulation of immune functions, redox homeostasis, and intracellular signaling in dendritic cells. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(13):10556–10564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Ogawa T, Ishitsuka Y. The role of KEAP1‐NRF2 system in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11(7):1397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Hiebert P, Wietecha MS, Cangkrama M, Haertel E, Mavrogonatou E, Stumpe M, et al. Nrf2‐mediated fibroblast reprogramming drives cellular senescence by targeting the Matrisome. Dev Cell. 2018;46(2):145–161.e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Juráňová J, Franková J, Ulrichová J. The role of keratinocytes in inflammation. J Appl Biomed. 2017;15(3):169–179. [Google Scholar]
- 122. Süntar I, Çetinkaya S, Panieri E, Saha S, Buttari B, Profumo E, et al. Regulatory role of Nrf2 signaling pathway in wound healing process. Molecules. 2021;26(9):2424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Braun S, Hanselmann C, Gassmann MG, auf dem Keller U, Born‐Berclaz C, Chan K, et al. Nrf2 transcription factor, a novel target of keratinocyte growth factor action which regulates gene expression and inflammation in the healing skin wound. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22(15):5492–5505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Telorack M, Meyer M, Ingold I, Conrad M, Bloch W, Werner S. A glutathione‐Nrf2‐thioredoxin cross‐Talk ensures keratinocyte survival and efficient wound repair. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(1):e1005800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Hiebert P, Werner S. Regulation of wound healing by the NRF2 transcription factor‐more than cytoprotection. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(16):3856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Long M, Rojo de la Vega M, Wen Q, Bharara M, Jiang T, Zhang R, et al. An essential role of NRF2 in diabetic wound healing. Diabetes. 2016;65(3):780–793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Rabbani PS, Zhou A, Borab ZM, Frezzo JA, Srivastava N, More HT, et al. Novel lipoproteoplex delivers Keap1 siRNA based gene therapy to accelerate diabetic wound healing. Biomaterials. 2017;132:1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Schmidt A, von Woedtke T, Vollmar B, Hasse S, Bekeschus S. Nrf2 signaling and inflammation are key events in physical plasma‐spurred wound healing. Theranostics. 2019;9(4):1066–1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Villarreal‐Ponce A, Tiruneh MW, Lee J, Guerrero‐Juarez CF, Kuhn J, David JA, et al. Keratinocyte‐macrophage crosstalk by the Nrf2/Ccl2/EGF signaling axis orchestrates tissue repair. Cell Rep. 2020;33(8):108417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Ahmed SMU, Luo L, Namani A, Wang XJ, Tang X. Nrf2 signaling pathway: pivotal roles in inflammation. Biochim Biophys Acta ‐ Mol Basis Dis. 2017;1863(2):585–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Li Y, Li L. Contact dermatitis: classifications and management. Clinic Rev Allerg Immunol. 2021;61(3):245–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Murphy PB, Atwater AR, Mueller M. Allergic contact dermatitis. StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 133. Saint‐Mezard P, Berard F, Dubois B, Kaiserlian D, Nicolas J‐F. The role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in contact hypersensitivity and allergic contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol. 2004;14:131–138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Gittler JK, Krueger JG, Guttman‐Yassky E. Atopic dermatitis results in intrinsic barrier and immune abnormalities: implications for contact dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(2):300–313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Scheinman PL, Vocanson M, Thyssen JP, Johansen JD, Nixon RL, Dear K, et al. Contact dermatitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. El Ali Z, Gerbeix C, Hemon P, Esser PR, Martin SF, Pallardy M, et al. Allergic skin inflammation induced by chemical sensitizers is controlled by the transcription factor Nrf2. Toxicol Sci. 2013;134(1):39–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Helou DG, Noël B, Gaudin F, Groux H, El Ali Z, Pallardy M, et al. Cutting edge: Nrf2 regulates neutrophil recruitment and accumulation in skin during contact hypersensitivity. J Immunol. 2019;202(8):2189–2194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Vallion R, Hardonnière K, Bouredji A, Damiens M‐H, Deloménie C, Pallardy M, et al. The inflammatory response in human keratinocytes exposed to cinnamaldehyde is regulated by Nrf2. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11(3):575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Flohr C, Mann J. New insights into the epidemiology of childhood atopic dermatitis. Allergy. 2014;69(1):3–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Barbarot S, Auziere S, Gadkari A, Girolomoni G, Puig L, Simpson EL, et al. Epidemiology of atopic dermatitis in adults: results from an international survey. Allergy. 2018;73(6):1284–1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Langan SM, Irvine AD, Weidinger S. Atopic dermatitis. Lancet. 2020;396(10247):345–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Luger T, Amagai M, Dreno B, Dagnelie M‐A, Liao W, Kabashima K, et al. Atopic dermatitis: role of the skin barrier, environment, microbiome, and therapeutic agents. J Dermatol Sci. 2021;102(3):142–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Palmer CNA, Irvine AD, Terron‐Kwiatkowski A, Zhao Y, Liao H, Lee SP, et al. Common loss‐of‐function variants of the epidermal barrier protein filaggrin are a major predisposing factor for atopic dermatitis. Nat Genet. 2006;38(4):441–446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Liang Y, Chang C, Lu Q. The genetics and epigenetics of atopic dermatitis‐filaggrin and other polymorphisms. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2016;51(3):315–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Hostetler SG, Kaffenberger B, Hostetler T, Zirwas MJ. The role of airborne proteins in atopic dermatitis. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010;3(1):22–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Ishitsuka Y, Roop DR. Loricrin at the boundary between inside and outside. Biomolecules. 2022;12(5):673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Pant T, Uche N, Juric M, Zielonka J, Bai X. Regulation of immunomodulatory networks by Nrf2‐activation in immune cells: redox control and therapeutic potential in inflammatory diseases. Redox Biol. 2024;70:103077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Koch M, Kockmann T, Rodriguez E, Wehkamp U, Hiebert P, Ben‐Yehuda Greenwald M, et al. Quantitative proteomics identifies reduced NRF2 activity and mitochondrial dysfunction in atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. 2023;143(2):220–231.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Ogawa T, Ishitsuka Y, Nakamura Y, Kubota N, Saito A, Fujisawa Y, et al. NRF2 augments epidermal antioxidant defenses and promotes atopy. J Immunol. 2020;205(4):907–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Shim K‐S, Park M, Yang W‐K, Lee H, Kim S‐H, Choo B‐K, et al. Veronica persica ethanol extract ameliorates dinitrochlorobenzene‐induced atopic dermatitis‐like skin inflammation in mice, likely by inducing Nrf2/HO‐1 signaling. Antioxidants. 2023;12(6):1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Wang Z, Zhang H, Qi C, Guo H, Jiao X, Yan J, et al. Ursolic acid ameliorates DNCB‐induced atopic dermatitis‐like symptoms in mice by regulating TLR4/NF‐κB and Nrf2/HO‐1 signaling pathways. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;118:110079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Borgia F, Li Pomi F, Vaccaro M, Alessandrello C, Papa V, Gangemi S. Oxidative stress and phototherapy in atopic dermatitis: mechanisms, role, and future perspectives. Biomolecules. 2022;12(12):1904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Roekevisch E, Spuls PI, Kuester D, Limpens J, Schmitt J. Efficacy and safety of systemic treatments for moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(2):429–438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Salman S, Guermonprez C, Peno‐Mazzarino L, Lati E, Rousseaud A, Declercq L, et al. Photobiomodulation controls keratinocytes inflammatory response through Nrf2 and reduces Langerhans cells activation. Antioxidants Basel. 2023;12(3):766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Koch M, Ferrarese L, Ben‐Yehuda Greenwald M, Werner S. Dose‐dependent effects of Nrf2 on the epidermis in chronic skin inflammation. Dis Model Mech. 2025;18(1):dmm052126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Parisi R, Iskandar IYK, Kontopantelis E, Augustin M, Griffiths CEM, Ashcroft DM. National, regional, and worldwide epidemiology of psoriasis: systematic analysis and modelling study. BMJ. 2020;369:m1590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Ogawa T, Ishitsuka Y, Inoue S, Nakamura Y, Saito A, Okiyama N, et al. Nuclear factor erythroid 2‐related factor 2 (Nrf2) regulates epidermal keratinization under psoriatic skin inflammation. Am J Pathol. 2020;190(3):577–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Groot J, Blegvad C, Nybo Andersen A‐M, Zachariae C, Skov L. Tonsillitis and pediatric psoriasis: cohort and cross‐sectional analyses of offspring from the Danish National Birth Cohort. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(3):666–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Kluger N, Estève E, Fouéré S, Dupuis‐Fourdan F, Jegou M‐H, Lévy‐Rameau C. Tattooing and psoriasis: a case series and review of the literature. Int J Dermatol. 2017;56(8):822–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Balak DM, Hajdarbegovic E. Drug‐induced psoriasis: clinical perspectives. Psoriasis. 2017;7:87–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Awad VM, Sakhamuru S, Kambampati S, Wasim S, Malik BH, Awad VM, et al. Mechanisms of beta‐blocker induced psoriasis, and psoriasis de novo at the cellular level. Cureus. 2020;12(7):e8964. 10.7759/cureus.8964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Nair RP, Stuart PE, Nistor I, Hiremagalore R, Chia NVC, Jenisch S, et al. Sequence and haplotype analysis supports HLA‐C as the psoriasis susceptibility 1 gene. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78(5):827–851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Albanesi C, Madonna S, Gisondi P, Girolomoni G. The interplay between keratinocytes and immune cells in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Orlik C, Deibel D, Küblbeck J, Balta E, Ganskih S, Habicht J, et al. Keratinocytes costimulate naive human T cells via CD2: a potential target to prevent the development of proinflammatory Th1 cells in the skin. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;17(4):380–394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Hawerkamp HC, Fahy CMR, Fallon PG, Schwartz C. Break on through: the role of innate immunity and barrier defence in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Skin Health Dis. 2022;2(2):e99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Orsmond A, Bereza‐Malcolm L, Lynch T, March L, Xue M. Skin barrier dysregulation in psoriasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(19):10841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Zhang J, Li X, Wei J, Chen H, Lu Y, Li L, et al. Gallic acid inhibits the expression of keratin 16 and keratin 17 through Nrf2 in psoriasis‐like skin disease. Int Immunopharmacol. 2018;65:84–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Heelan K, Markham T. Fumaric acid esters as a suitable first‐line treatment for severe psoriasis: an Irish experience. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2012;37(7):793–795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Brennan MS, Matos MF, Li B, Hronowski X, Gao B, Juhasz P, et al. Dimethyl fumarate and monoethyl fumarate exhibit differential effects on KEAP1, NRF2 activation, and glutathione depletion in vitro. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0120254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Mazarakis N, Snibson K, Licciardi PV, Karagiannis TC. The potential use of l‐sulforaphane for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases: a review of the clinical evidence. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(3):664–675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Ma C, Gu C, Lian P, Wazir J, Lu R, Ruan B, et al. Sulforaphane alleviates psoriasis by enhancing antioxidant defense through KEAP1‐NRF2 pathway activation and attenuating inflammatory signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14(11):768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Sangaraju R, Alavala S, Nalban N, Jerald MK, Sistla R. Galangin ameliorates imiquimod‐induced psoriasis‐like skin inflammation in BALB/c mice via down regulating NF‐κB and activation of Nrf2 signaling pathways. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;96:107754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Aladaileh SH, Abukhalil MH, Saghir SAM, Hanieh H, Alfwuaires MA, Almaiman AA, et al. Galangin activates Nrf2 signaling and attenuates oxidative damage, inflammation, and apoptosis in a rat model of cyclophosphamide‐induced hepatotoxicity. Biomolecules. 2019;9(8):346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Liu C‐T, Yen J‐HJ, Brown DA, Song Y‐C, Chu M‐Y, Hung Y‐H, et al. Targeting Nrf2 with 3 H‐1,2‐dithiole‐3‐thione to moderate OXPHOS‐driven oxidative stress attenuates IL‐17A‐induced psoriasis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;159:114294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Schäfer M, Willrodt A‐H, Kurinna S, Link AS, Farwanah H, Geusau A, et al. Activation of Nrf2 in keratinocytes causes chloracne (MADISH)‐like skin disease in mice. EMBO Mol Med. 2014;6(4):442–457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Ju Q, Fimmel S, Hinz N, Stahlmann R, Xia L, Zouboulis CC. 2,3,7,8‐Tetrachlorodibenzo‐p‐dioxin alters sebaceous gland cell differentiation in vitro. Exp Dermatol. 2011;20(4):320–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Kennedy LH, Sutter CH, Leon Carrion S, Tran QT, Bodreddigari S, Kensicki E, et al. 2,3,7,8‐Tetrachlorodibenzo‐p‐dioxin‐mediated production of reactive oxygen species is an essential step in the mechanism of action to accelerate human keratinocyte differentiation. Toxicol Sci. 2013;132(1):235–249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Miao W, Hu L, Scrivens PJ, Batist G. Transcriptional regulation of NF‐E2 p45‐related factor (NRF2) expression by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor‐xenobiotic response element signaling pathway: direct cross‐talk between phase I and II drug‐metabolizing enzymes. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(21):20340–20348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Shin S, Wakabayashi N, Misra V, Biswal S, Lee GH, Agoston ES, et al. NRF2 modulates aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling: influence on adipogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27(20):7188–7197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Haarmann‐Stemmann T, Abel J, Fritsche E, Krutmann J. The AhR–Nrf2 pathway in keratinocytes: on the road to chemoprevention? J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(1):7–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Edamitsu T, Taguchi K, Okuyama R, Yamamoto M. AHR and NRF2 in skin homeostasis and atopic dermatitis. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11(2):227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Furue M, Fuyuno Y, Mitoma C, Uchi H, Tsuji G. Therapeutic agents with AHR inhibiting and NRF2 activating activity for managing chloracne. Antioxidants (Basel). 2018;7(7):90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
