Table 3.
Comparison of segmentation efficiency using PointSegNet and five other state-of-the-art networks.
| PointNet++ | PCT | PointMLP | SPoTr | PointVector | Ours | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Params (M) | 1.74 | 2.88 | 16.71 | 25.56 | 4.07 | 1.32 |
| FLOPs (G) | 4.09 | 2.32 | 132.85 | 151.18 | 14 | 4.73 |
Comparison of segmentation efficiency using PointSegNet and five other state-of-the-art networks.
| PointNet++ | PCT | PointMLP | SPoTr | PointVector | Ours | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Params (M) | 1.74 | 2.88 | 16.71 | 25.56 | 4.07 | 1.32 |
| FLOPs (G) | 4.09 | 2.32 | 132.85 | 151.18 | 14 | 4.73 |