Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common and complex skin disease that significantly affects the quality of life of patients. The latest advances in artificial intelligence (AI) technology have introduced new methods for diagnosing, treating, and managing AD. AI has various innovative applications in the diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis, with particular emphasis on its significant benefits in medical diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and patient care. AI algorithms, especially those that use deep learning techniques, demonstrate strong performance in recognizing skin images and effectively distinguishing different types of skin lesions, including common AD manifestations. In addition, artificial intelligence has also shown promise in creating personalized treatment plans, simplifying drug development processes, and managing clinical trials. Despite challenges in data privacy and model transparency, the potential of artificial intelligence in advancing AD care is enormous, bringing the future to precision medicine and improving patient outcomes. This manuscript provides a comprehensive review of the application of AI in the process of AD disease for the first time, aiming to play a key role in the advancement of AI in skin health care and further enhance the clinical diagnosis and treatment of AD.
Keywords: Atopic dermatitis, artificial intelligence, deep learning, skin disease, interdisciplinary
Introduction
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic and recurrent inflammatory skin condition primarily characterized by severe itching and dryness. It involves epidermal barrier dysfunction and immune response disorders exacerbated by environmental factors [1]. The onset of AD is complex, involving genetic predisposition, environmental triggers, immune system irregularities, and defects in the skin’s epidermal barrier. This intricacy complicates the diagnosis and management of AD, presenting a significant clinical challenge [2]. Epidemiological data collected in 2022 indicate that approximately 10–20% of children and 2–10% of adults worldwide are affected by AD, with prevalence varying by region and ethnicity, and higher rates observed in developed countries [3]. Beyond its effects on the skin, AD significantly impacts the quality of life, causing sleep disturbances, emotional instability, and psychosocial challenges. Key clinical concerns related to AD include challenges in accurate diagnosis, therapeutic management, and long-term care. The disease’s diverse clinical manifestations can be mistaken for other conditions, such as psoriasis and contact dermatitis [4]. Diagnosis typically involves a detailed medical history, physical examination, and sometimes additional tests, further complicating the diagnostic process. AD is a chronic condition requiring prolonged treatment and regular adjustments to daily routines, diet, and skincare practices to control symptoms and prevent relapse effectively [5].
Currently, the diagnosis of AD primarily relies on clinicians’ experience and traditional methods such as skin biopsy [6]. These methods are time-consuming, and their accuracy can vary depending on the clinician, leading to imprecise and inconsistent diagnoses. Conventional diagnostic procedures are ineffective in distinguishing between skin lesions, which can delay diagnosis and classification, potentially resulting in misdiagnosis or missed diagnoses. Treatment options for AD include topical drugs such as glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors, systemic treatments such as immunosuppressants and phototherapy, and biological agents [7]. Although these treatments can offer some symptom relief, their effectiveness is frequently limited and accompanied by side effects [7,8]. Patients with moderate to severe AD face challenges in finding effective long-term treatment with the current options. Prolonged drug use can lead to drug resistance and other side effects, further limiting treatment options. Moreover, managing AD is complicated due to its chronic nature, requiring adjustments to lifestyle, diet, and skincare routines. Most patients lack sufficient medical knowledge and expertise, resulting in suboptimal disease management, frequent relapses, and a significant reduction in quality of life [9,10]. Therefore, increasing patients’ self-management abilities and enhancing the quality of long-term care are crucial priorities.
Doctors and researchers have explored effective ways to diagnose and treat AD. Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has recently made significant advances, opening up more possibilities for the diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis [11]. By leveraging deep learning and extensive data analysis, AI technology can offer more precise diagnostic capabilities. Moreover, AI technology provides advantages in personalized treatment and immediate patient care. AI has expanded into various domains, including medical image recognition, genomic analysis, drug discovery, and continuous patient monitoring [12,13]. In dermatology, AI algorithms have been applied to analyze and classify skin lesions with a diagnostic accuracy comparable to dermatologists. Furthermore, AI enables comprehensive analysis of extensive clinical data, helping to define diseases, predict their occurrence, and recommend tailored treatment plans for individual patients [14,15].
This manuscript presents the application of AI technology in diagnosing, treating, and managing AD. Moreover, it analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of these applications in clinical practice and considers the potential future advancements of AI in skincare.
Application of AI in AD diagnosis
Application of AI algorithms in skin image analysis
AI-based skin image recognition plays a crucial role in diagnosing AD. Previous findings indicate the effectiveness of AI algorithms, particularly deep-learning technologies, in analyzing skin images with remarkable accuracy. By training AI using extensive datasets of skin lesion images, these algorithms can accurately identify different types of skin lesions, including typical AD presentations [16]. Complex neural network architectures such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are used to analyze image features and patterns. In a study by Kim, hyperspectral imaging (HSI) was integrated with AI to enhance the diagnosis and classification of AD. They adopted parameter-based transfer learning, where the AI model was trained on datasets comprising psoriasis, eczema, and AD features. The study demonstrated that integrating the ResNet-50 model with hyperspectral imaging achieved the highest classification accuracy of 83% in diagnosing the severity of AD [17]. These observations indicate that integrating hyperspectral imaging with deep learning models significantly improves the accuracy of AD classification.
AI technology has significantly advanced lesion detection and classification, particularly in AD. Trained AI models effectively identify AD features from various skin images based on lesion color, shape, and texture. Maulana’s study collected images from 250 patients and evaluated five deep learning models, namely ResNet-50, VGGNet-19, MobileNetV3, MnasNet, and EfficientNetB0, for the automatic assessment of atopic dermatitis severity. The performance of these models was measured using metrics such as accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. Among these, ResNet-50 demonstrated the best performance, achieving an accuracy of 89.80%, a precision of 90.00%, a sensitivity of 89.80%, a specificity of 96.70%, and an F1 score of 89.95% [18]. This shows that ResNet-50 has strong ability to identify complex patterns and is suitable for skin lesion image analysis. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of deep learning models in diagnosing AD and support further advancements in this field. Also, these models hold promise in aiding dermatologists in accurately determining the severity of AD and ensuring patients receive proper care [19]. Furthermore, Medela conducted a pilot study using deep learning to score AD based on 604 skin images, achieving a diagnostic accuracy of 84.6% [20]. This study highlighted the role of deep learning in dermatology image classification and its potential to reduce bias and expand unbiased analysis in dermatology images. Moreover, Sojeong Park et al. developed a CNN model, The original 3D RSOM image is processed through data augmentation (Data Augmentation), including rotation and flipping operations, and then randomly crops a fixed-size area to generate more training samples and increase the generalization ability of the model. In addition, the researchers extracted four features: total blood volume (TBV), epidermal thickness (ET), low- and high-frequency signal ratio (LHFR), and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) to differentiate between healthy and eczema (AD) conditions, as well as mild AD and moderate to severe AD [21]. Using the 3D photoacoustic microscopy images of patients with AD, the CNN model achieved a high accuracy of 97% in distinguishing healthy individuals from patients with AD. Moreover, the random forest model demonstrated 65% accuracy in classifying mild and moderate AD cases compared to severe cases [21]. This research demonstrated the promise of photoacoustic microscopy in AD diagnosis and highlighted the application of various ML methods in diagnosing skin diseases.
In addition to deep learning methods, traditional machine learning algorithms also demonstrate unique value in the analysis of skin images related to atopic dermatitis (AD). Support vector machines (SVM) exhibit exceptional performance in diagnosing AD skin images, particularly due to their effectiveness with small sample datasets and their capability to manage nonlinear classification challenges. The SVM classifier, when based on texture features, shows high specificity and sensitivity in differentiating AD from other inflammatory skin lesions. Meanwhile, artificial neural networks (ANN) effectively capture the complex characteristics of skin lesions through their multi-layer perceptron architecture. Furthermore, ensemble learning methods enhance the accuracy and stability of AD diagnosis by integrating the strengths of multiple classifiers. The combined application of these traditional machine learning techniques alongside deep learning technologies offers a more comprehensive solution for the intelligent diagnosis of AD.
The application of AI for image analysis provides several advantages over traditional methods, primarily by improving diagnostic efficiency and minimizing the impact of human factors. Conventional diagnostic approaches depend heavily on the training and experience of individual doctors, which can vary and lead to inconsistencies [22]. In contrast, AI ensures uniformity in image analysis procedures, enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of clinical diagnosis.
Application in other diagnostic tools
Genetic and biomarker analysis
Besides skin image recognition, AI holds promise in analyzing gene expression data to identify biomarkers associated with the disease and gain insights into its molecular characteristics. This capability lays a foundation for developing personalized therapies tailored to individual patients.
Dev et al. used gene expression data to explore skin barrier function and immune response in patients with AD. They employed an ML-assisted handheld confocal Raman microspectroscopy (CRM) system to analyze gene expression profiles in these patients comprehensively. The results showed the PLS-DA model achieved an accuracy of 92% in distinguishing patients from healthy individuals, with a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 85% respectively [23]. This approach enhances the diagnostic performance for AD by identifying essential skin chemical components, such as proteins and lipids, in the skin surface layer.
Furthermore, faced with challenges in AD diagnosis, such as variable morphology, irregular distribution, and lack of objective and effective markers, researchers have proposed an innovative method. This method involves combining transcriptomic data of intestinal epithelial colon cells with intestinal microbiome data to develop a machine learning classifier for accurate automatic diagnosis of AD. The classifier, tested on 161 samples including 88 AD patients and 73 healthy controls, exhibited strong performance with an average F1 score of 0.84. A high F1 score indicates the model’s accuracy in distinguishing AD patients from non-patients, making it a crucial indicator for evaluating classifier performance [24]. The study not only showcases the potential of machine learning in diagnosing complex diseases but also suggests the possibility of identifying new biomarkers for early detection and personalized treatment of AD.
Through its integrated learning characteristics, the random forest (RF) algorithm effectively processes high-dimensional gene expression data, facilitating the screening and classification of genes associated with atopic dermatitis (AD). Research indicates that the RF model successfully identifies multiple key genes involved in the pathogenesis of AD when analyzing gene expression datasets, such as GSE120721. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), a powerful feature selection method, plays a crucial role in identifying key biomarkers related to AD. By combining LASSO with Support Vector Machine Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE), researchers have successfully identified a series of biomarkers closely associated with the onset and progression of AD, including CCR5 and its related transcription factors NR3C2 and YY1 [25]. These findings not only enhance the accuracy of AD diagnosis but also provide new molecular targets for targeted therapy. Furthermore, these algorithms demonstrate excellent performance in analyzing immune cell infiltration characteristics and cytokine networks, thereby aiding researchers in better understanding the immunopathological mechanisms underlying AD [26].
Medical record data analysis
Using AI to analyze medical history data is an important and expanding area of research. By applying natural language processing (NLP) technology, AI can extract crucial information from electronic health records (EHRs), providing physicians with a comprehensive overview of a patient’s condition and treatment history [27]. A study based on a large language model found that AI tools outperformed general practitioners’ responses in terms of quality and empathy in answering 99 common questions about atopic dermatitis patients provided by 11 international dermatologists [28]. Gustafson conducted a classification study using ML models and EHRs to predict adult patients with AD accurately. The study used Ontario’s health database to identify patients with dermatitis through keyword searches and diagnostic coding. Electronic medical records were manually audited to verify the accuracy of algorithmic identification, and multiple machine learning (ML) algorithms were used for text classification. Different methods for identifying AD in routine health data in Ontario were evaluated, highlighting the potential for using ML to improve diagnostic algorithms to more accurately identify AD cases [29]. By processing extensive medical history data using these ML algorithms, AI systems can effectively identify potential risk factors and trends associated with AD, aiding in accurate diagnosis.
Application of multimodal AI models
Multimodal artificial intelligence models are enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of diseases diagnosis by integrating various data sources, including image recognition, text analysis, and biomarker detection [30]. These models can analyze visual information from patient skin images and combine it with symptom descriptions, patient self-reported data, and biomarkers to enhance diagnostic reliability. By leveraging deep learning algorithms, multi-modal models can recognize and understand the intricate patterns of skin diseases, offering doctors more precise diagnostic assistance in the initial phases [31]. In a study, researchers created a software named MedIA (Medical Data Integration Assistant) capable of exploring and extracting specific data subsets for analysis. The MedIA system facilitates data management through the integration and visualization of AD patients data and information, assisting data scientists in accessing necessary datasets [32]. This approach facilitates efficient data management and subset selection, enabling researchers to identify the underlying pathological mechanisms of AD with greater ease and accuracy. Another pioneering example involved combining multiphoton tomography with CNN technology, The researchers collected 3,663 MPT images containing morphological and metabolic data from both AD patients and healthy volunteers. These images were used to train a CNN model capable of automatically identifying living cells and diagnosing AD. The algorithm achieved a 97.0% accuracy in detecting live cell images, with a sensitivity of 0.966 and a specificity of 0.977 [33]. Additionally, the study improved the interpretability of the algorithm by employing deep Taylor decomposition techniques, which highlighted important features in images for a specific classification using heat maps.
Compared to traditional single-modal methods, multimodal models demonstrate advantages on multiple levels. Unimodal methods are often constrained to a single data source, which may result in the omission or bias of diagnostic information. In contrast, the multimodal approach can more accurately identify features of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and mitigate the impact of false positives and false negatives by comprehensively analyzing data from multiple sources. In diagnosing AD, multimodal AI can integrate skin images and clinical symptoms, as well as genomic and microbiome data, to predict disease progression and develop personalized treatment plans [34]. This integrated approach significantly enhances clinical utility and accuracy. Although multimodal AI models exhibit considerable potential, they encounter challenges in practical applications, such as the complexity of data fusion, the necessity for cross-institutional data standardization, and the limited availability of data for model training. Addressing these issues requires strengthening interdisciplinary collaboration and developing more efficient algorithms, thereby further advancing the application of multimodal AI models in clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Clinical advantages of AI-assisted diagnosis
Using AI in disease diagnosis offers significant benefits by improving the speed and reliability of diagnostic outcomes. Unlike conventional diagnostic approaches, AI systems efficiently process data and generate diagnostic results promptly, reducing assessment times [35,36]. This process optimizes diagnostic speed and improves the medical experience by minimizing patient waiting times. Several successful applications of AI in the diagnosis of AD are available. For example, A study from Spain demonstrated that the integration of AI and machine learning can effectively reduce the time required for SCORAD, a common diagnostic tool for atopic dermatitis, to detect and diagnose the condition while maintaining accuracy [20]. Additionally, research has shown success in utilizing AI and hyperspectral imaging (HSI) for diagnosing atopic dermatitis. This technology has significantly enhanced the diagnostic process by leveraging comprehensive data sets and advanced multi-frame algorithms. The model exhibited high sensitivity (90.72%), specificity (96.76%), and prediction accuracy in identifying atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and other skin lesions [37]. These algorithms effectively differentiated AD from other skin disorders with high accuracy, comparable to or slightly exceeding standard dermatology practices in some cases. AI systems have demonstrated clinical effectiveness, particularly in targeted clinical scenarios and their implementation in real-world settings. Such systems contribute to increasing the accuracy of diagnostic systems and reducing the subjectivity in the process. Furthermore, research and clinical trials have shown that using AI in diagnosis significantly reduces misdiagnosis rates and enhances the credibility of clinical diagnostic systems [38]. At the same time, AI-based assessment systems offer superior objectivity and precision in evaluating AD severity compared to traditional human assessment, as they eliminate subjective bias and provide consistent, quantifiable measurements across different evaluations. This standardized approach is particularly valuable for tracking disease progression and treatment efficacy over time. Analyze from a long-term perspective, the potential for collaboration between medical practitioners and AI systems is substantial, paving the way for more effective healthcare delivery and improved patient outcomes.
Artificial intelligence systems have shown remarkable advantages in diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, with encouraging results such as ResNet-50 achieving 83% accuracy in disease severity classification and 3D optoacoustic microscopy combined with CNN reaching an impressive 97% accuracy. However, these technological advances face several key challenges: the reliability of AI diagnosis heavily depends on large-scale, high-quality datasets, which are often difficult to obtain due to privacy concerns and lack of standardization across institutions. Moreover, while studies show promising accuracy rates, most current research involves relatively small sample sizes and lacks extensive real-world validation against experienced dermatologists. A particularly promising direction is the multimodal AI approach, which combines image analysis, genetic data, and clinical records for more comprehensive diagnosis. However, implementing such systems requires significant infrastructure investment and careful integration into existing clinical workflows. Looking ahead, we believe the key to successful AI implementation in AD diagnosis lies in viewing it as a tool to enhance, rather than replace, clinical expertise. Future research should focus on larger multicenter studies, standardized data protocols, and clear guidelines for clinical integration while maintaining the crucial role of physician judgment in patient care.
By integrating AI into medical practice, doctors can harness AI’s robust data analytical capabilities alongside their personal experience and expertise in the medical field to enhance healthcare services. Integrating technology into the human-machine practice model is expected to be a prominent trend in future medical advancements, holding promise for improving early diagnosis and treatment of AD and other skin conditions (Figure 1 and Table 1).
Figure 1.
The role of artificial intelligence in diagnosis of atopic dermatitis.
Table 1.
Summary of key studies on AI applications in atopic dermatitis.
Author & year | Study focus | AI method/model | Results/outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Zarca et al. 2018 | Tele-expertise for skin lesion diagnosis in prison setting | Al-based teledermatology system | Increased treatment plan completion rates |
Guimarães et al. 2020 | AD diagnosis using multiphoton tomography | CNN with deep Taylor decomposition | 97.0% accuracy, 0.966 sensitivity, 0.977 specificity |
Yamamoto-Hanada et al. 2020 | Plasma cytokine/chemokine analysis | Machine learning analysis | Identified CCL17 and CCL27 associated with AD |
Bang et al. 2021 | AD severity scoring | Deep neural network | High accuracy comparable to dermatologist assessment |
Park et al. 2021 | 3D optoacoustic mesoscopy analysis | CNN model | 97% accuracy in AD detection, 65% for severity classification |
Dev et al. 2022 | Biomarker identification using Raman spectroscopy | ML-assisted CRM | 92% accuracy, 94% sensitivity, 85% specificity |
Jiang et al. 2022 | Combined transcriptome and microbiota analysis | Supervised machine learning | F1 score of 0.84 across 161 samples |
Li et al. 2022 | AD prediction using bSRWPSO-FKNN | Boosted PSO with fuzzy KNN | Identified key biomarkers (LY, cat dander, milk, IgE) |
Medela et al. 2022 | Automatic SCORAD scoring | Deep learning | 84.6% diagnostic accuracy |
Wu et al. 2022 | Dupilumab response prediction | Machine learning analysis | Identified 35% non-responders and predictive factors |
Wang et al. 2022 | Drug development (CMA analysis) | Network analysis-deep learning | Identified CMA as TNFα/IL-4 inhibitor for AD |
Kern et al. 2023 | Digital self-help intervention | AI-based CBT system | Effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.84) at 3-month follow-up |
Maulana et al. 2023 | AD severity evaluation | Multiple deep learning models | ResNet-50: 89.80% accuracy, 90.00% precision |
Yamanaka et al. 2023 | Drug development using DRAGONET | Deep learning for molecule generation | Generated new therapeutic molecular structures |
Huang et al. 2024 | Skin lesion identification | HSI with Al | 90.72% sensitivity, 96.76% specificity |
Kim et al. 2024 | AD severity classification | ResNet-50 with HSI | 83% classification accuracy |
Sulejmani et al. 2024 | Patient query response | Large language model | Outperformed GPs in quality and empathy |
Role of AI in the treatment of AD
Formulation of personalized treatment plans
AI is gradually becoming a vital tool in the evolving landscape of personalized health. By considering patients’ genetic makeup, lifestyle, environment, and clinical signs, AI can tailor treatment regimens to suit individual patients more effectively [39]. The traditional one-size-fits-all approach to managing skin diseases is inadequate and need be replaced. By applying deep learning to patients’ genetic history, skin microbiome characteristics, medical history, and observable symptoms, AI accurately predicts factors that might influence disease severity and treatment response [40,41].
Applying AI in treating AD has shown remarkable success, mainly through advanced AI technologies in developing treatment plans. Models such as random forest, SVM, and CNN analyze extensive datasets, including gene expression data and clinical history, to identify response patterns across various patient sub-populations [42]. This approach ensures efficient and tailored treatment strategies, increasing positive outcomes and reducing the adverse effects of ineffective treatments. Furthermore, AI integrates diverse datasets to provide comprehensive information, further supporting the development of individualized treatment plans. An exploratory analysis based on the Japanese Environmental and Child Study, using machine learning techniques to study plasma cytokine/chemokine levels in 6-year-old children, found that atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with specific chemokines CCL17 and Association with elevated CCL27 levels. In addition, using AI technology, the study divided children with asthma symptoms into two different biomarker groups, revealing potential avenues for personalized treatment [43].
Application in AD drug development
Integrating AI technology into drug discovery and development transforms the conventional approach by reducing costs and timeframes associated with bringing new drugs to market. In drug development for treating AD, AI plays a crucial role in enhancing the process and optimizing the administration of clinical trials.
Optimization of drug development process
During the initial stages of drug discovery, AI accelerates the screening process by using computer models to simulate interactions between compounds and biological targets [44]. Employing ML and deep-learning algorithms, AI screens through databases containing millions of compounds, predicting their biological activities and potential side effects. This approach significantly expedites drug discovery timelines while minimizing the research and development expenditures [45]. For instance, A research team led by Professor Yoshihiro Yamanishi developed an innovative computational method, named DRAGONET, focusing on the treatment of AD. This method uses deep learning technology to automatically generate new drug molecular structures with therapeutic potential based on patients’ gene expression data [46]. The research team first identified Disease Reversal Molecules (DRMs) that were inversely related to specific gene expression patterns of atopic dermatitis, and then used the variational autoencoder (VAE) model, especially the transformer-based VAE model to explore the latent space and generate new molecular structures. Specifically, the 1st DRM identified in the study contains a variety of nitrogen atoms and ring structures, while the newly generated molecules have undergone structural optimization while maintaining the six-membered ring structure, such as transforming a benzene ring into a pyridine ring, which is closer to the structure of pyridoxal phosphate hydrate, a registered drug for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. They applied DRAGONET to generate drug candidate molecules for atopic dermatitis, and demonstrated that the newly generated molecules were chemically similar to registered drugs for each disease.
Multi-target drug screening and optimization
Through the integration of network analysis, deep learning, and molecular simulation techniques, the research team identified caffeoyl malic acid (CMA) from Taiwan’s traditional Chinese medicine database as a promising dual inhibitor of TNFα/IL-4 for atopic dermatitis. Molecular simulations demonstrated that CMA exhibits strong binding affinity to TNF-α and IL-4, potentially altering protein conformation and impeding the formation of protein-receptor complexes [47]. These findings suggest the potential of CMA as a therapeutic agent for atopic dermatitis. AI has revolutionized the drug discovery process for treating AD by enhancing the understanding interactions between compounds and biological targets. AI enables rapid virtual screening of extensive compound libraries, identifies drug molecules with multi-target activities, and predicts their biological effectiveness and potential toxicity. Such measures accelerate drug discovery and improve success rates compared to traditional methods.
Optimization of clinical trials
Artificial intelligence technology plays a critical role in drug clinical trials, particularly in patient recruitment and data analysis phases. By leveraging electronic health records, AI efficiently sifts through vast amounts of medical data to pinpoint eligible patients, saving time and reducing errors. This approach is frequently utilized for patient enrollment in studies related to melanoma, psoriasis, and different types of tumors [48]. Moreover, artificial intelligence monitors and assesses real-time test data to identify anomalies and trends, thereby enhancing the credibility and efficiency of trials. It aids in the identification of side effects and prediction of treatment success by analyzing patient response data [49].
Predicting treatment response and monitoring therapeutic effects
Among those with AD, capturing patient responses to specific management approaches and monitoring therapeutic efficacy in real time is essential. As AI progresses, it will enable a better understanding of patient reactions to different treatments and facilitate real-time management of treatment effectiveness, allowing adjustments as necessary.
Predicting patient responses to different treatment regimens
Patient characteristics significantly influence treatment outcomes in AD [50]. AI technology can predict patient’s sensitivity and potential responses to specific treatment plans based on genetics, skin lesion data, and prior treatment records. A study conducted by the Dermatology Research and Education Foundation and Pfizer utilized machine learning to analyze data from 419 atopic dermatitis patients in order to predict their response to dupilumab treatment. The findings revealed that 35% of patients exhibited signs of non-response to the treatment, with treatment discontinuation being the most prevalent indicator. Notable predictive factors identified in the study included patient usage of ibuprofen and a higher Quan-Charlson comorbidity index [51]. These research findings contribute to the advancement of clinical prediction for atopic dermatitis and offer insights to enhance disease management strategies.
Moreover, an innovative study extended the application of AI in medical diagnostics by introducing the bSRWPSO-FKNN intelligent model. The study conducted 10 rounds of 10-fold cross-validation experiments on a medical dataset with 181 atopic dermatitis patients to validate the predictive capability of the bSRWPSO-FKNN model. Results indicate that the model successfully identified key features influencing the onset of atopic dermatitis, such as lymphocyte content (LY), cat dander, milk, and total IgE. The combination of these features, along with nine public and medical datasets, demonstrates the scientific rigor and practical value of the bSRWPSO-FKNN model in predicting AD [52]. The potential of AI in aiding the prediction of atopic dermatitis treatment has been recognized for its long-term development.
Real-time monitoring and adjustment of therapeutic effects
Real-time monitoring and AI-aided diagnosis are vital for optimizing patient care. Aaron M. Smith ‘s study, utilizing deep learning for disease prediction in conditions such as UC, AD, and cancers, demonstrates the impact of gene selection, standardization, and algorithms on accuracy. Their work highlights the potential of deep learning with proper preprocessing and algorithm choice for enhancing diagnostic accuracy. This approach aids in developing AI tools for analyzing large datasets, supporting real-time treatment monitoring. The study sets benchmarks for AI prediction models and provides resources for exploring large-scale datasets like GTEx and TCGA, emphasizing the need for ML to handle complex data for improving model generalizability and accuracy [53].
Artificial intelligence can assist patients with atopic dermatitis in achieving improved therapeutic outcomes through the management of personalized treatment, drug development, prediction, optimization of clinical trials, and efficacy forecasting (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
The role of artificial intelligence in atopic dermatitis treatment.
AI applications in AD patient management
Self-management and disease monitoring
Self-management plays a crucial role in sustaining remission among patients with AD. AI-powered self-monitoring applications empower patients to track changes in their condition, medication adherence, and behavioral patterns in real-time using smart devices and applications. These devices gather daily data on skin condition, itchiness, humidity, temperature, and other parameters, which are then transmitted to the cloud for analysis. The research team, led by Martin Kraepelien, has developed a digital self-service intervention tool for atopic dermatitis (AD). This tool includes exposure and mindfulness exercises to track symptoms and triggers through a digital diary, significantly reducing participant workload. In cross-validation experiments, the within-group effect size of the new tool at the 3-month follow-up (Cohen’s d = 0.84) was found to be similar to that of a comprehensively guided intervention, suggesting the potential of digital psychological self-help tools in treating atopic dermatitis [54]. The study findings indicated that patients who utilized the tool exhibited improved self-management skills and a decrease in the frequency of exacerbations. A study with 21 Swedish AD patients demonstrated that a self-help intervention utilizing cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) helped patients access health information and enhance their understanding of the condition [55]. This intervention notably enhanced patients’ quality of life, decreased itching, and reduced levels of depression and stress, with effects ranging from moderate to significant.
Overall, AI tools expand on previous web-based interventions supervised by clinicians, saving clinician time by simplifying and optimizing the user interface, and reducing participant reading while maintaining group engagement comparable to fully supervised web-based interventions in terms of within effect sizes and response rates.
Health education and psychological support
Educational support and psychological care play a crucial role in the successful management of AD [56]. The integration of artificial intelligence technology has facilitated the creation of personalized health education platforms that offer customized health information and educational resources. For instance, the recently introduced mobile health application AtopipApp delivers educational content on AD epidemiology, severity progression, and treatment options. This app is specifically tailored to assist parents in managing AD in their children. The significant reduction in the POEM score among users of the Atopic App indicates a potential impact of this tool on health care engagement by caregivers of children with AD. These applications empower patients to access disease management resources conveniently, acquire practical nursing skills, and enhance their understanding and management capabilities of the condition [57].
Furthermore, AI technology enables real-time psychological support through virtual health assistants. These assistants interact with patients, addressing their inquiries about disease management and providing emotional support. This continuous psychological support effectively alleviates patients’ anxiety and depression, improving their overall mental health. By offering personalized health education and psychological support, AI technology plays a significant role in the long-term care of patients with AD. It helps them effectively cope with the psychological challenges associated with the disease, enhancing their quality of life.
AI applications in telemedicine
Telemedicine is becoming increasingly important in managing AD, especially in remote areas or during unique circumstances. AI technology enhances telemedicine services by making them more efficient and accessible [58]. Two studies, one by Karolinska Institute in Sweden and the other by Kevin Zarca’s team in a French prison, showcased the use of AI telemedicine in treating atopic dermatitis (AD). Kern’s study focused on a digital self-help intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), which showed moderate to large improvements in 21 adult AD patients over 8 weeks. Zarca’s research, on the other hand, demonstrated a significant increase in treatment plan completion rates among inmate patients through a remote expert network. Both studies underscore the benefits of AI telemedicine in offering convenient, cost-effective, and efficacious AD treatment across various settings, including unique environments like prisons [55,59].
In addition, artificial intelligence technology has significantly improved the efficiency of remote monitoring and follow-up of dermatological patients. Currently, artificial intelligence remote detection systems have been developed for diseases such as psoriasis, melanoma and skin burns. For example, the image-based YOLO-v4 algorithm performs remote assessment of psoriasis; Australian health services use artificial intelligence systems to remotely assess skin wounds; and a team uses computer deep learning and artificial intelligence to provide remote guidance to patients with skin burns [60–62]. This series of AI applications can help with clinical judgment or treatment planning. With AI-driven decision support systems integrated into remote monitoring platforms, healthcare providers can make more informed clinical decisions and optimize resource allocation. Allows doctors to monitor changes in a patient’s condition in real time and adjust treatment plans if necessary (Figure 3 and Table 2).
Figure 3.
Application of artificial intelligence in the management of atopic dermatitis patients.
Table 2.
Current AI-based tools and applications for AD management.
Tool name | Type | Main functions | Main functions & algorithms |
---|---|---|---|
Diagnostic tools | |||
ResNet-50 with HSl | Image analysis | AD severity classification and diagnosis | Residual neural network |
VGGNet-19 | Image analysis | AD severity assessment | Deep convolutional neural network |
MobileNetV3 | Image analysis | AD severity assessment | Lightweight CNN for mobile devices |
MnasNet | Image analysis | AD severity assessment | Mobile neural architecture search |
EfficientNetB0 | Image analysis | AD severity assessment | Compound scaling optimization |
Multiphoton tomography with CNN | Advanced imaging | Cell identification and AD diagnosis | CNN with deep Taylor decomposition |
PLS-DA model with CRM | Biomarker analysis | Gene expression profile analysis | Partial least squares discriminant |
Treatment tools | |||
DRAGONET | Drug development | Novel drug molecule generation | Variational autoencoder (VAE) |
MedlA | Data management | Patient data integration and analysis | Multimodal algorithms |
ML-based Dupilumab response predictor | Treatment response | Treatment response prediction | Supervised machine learning |
bSRWPSO-FKNN | Disease prediction | AD onset prediction | Boosted PSO with fuzzy KNN classifier |
Patient management tools | |||
AtopipApp | Mobile health | Education and disease monitoring | Personalized content algorithms |
Digital CBT self-help tool | Psychological support | Self-management intervention | CBT algorithms with AI personalization |
YOLO-v4 algorithm | Remote monitoring | Remote lesion assessment | Real-time object detection |
Al virtual health assistant | Patient support | Real-time patient guidance | NLP and machine learning |
Challenges and prospects
Opportunities and challenges in AI application
Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) for atopic dermatitis (AD) diagnosis and treatment show promise but are not without hurdles. The efficacy of AI is contingent on accessing comprehensive and varied medical data. However, this is impeded by privacy concerns, data standardization challenges, and institutional interoperability gaps. Moreover, the ‘black box’ nature of AI models, which are often opaque, can erode trust among healthcare professionals and patients, emphasizing the need for transparency to ensure AI-assisted decisions are embraced and effective.
Despite these challenges, AI’s potential in revolutionizing AD management is vast. It offers the ability to predict diseases, facilitate early diagnoses, and craft personalized risk assessments and preventative strategies that consider individual genetic, lifestyle, and environmental factors. AI also accelerates drug discovery, offering patients a wider array of treatment options. The integration of AI in telemedicine and mHealth is set to enhance disease management by providing real-time monitoring and personalized care, thereby improving life quality for patients. To harness AI’s full potential, there is a pressing need for robust data infrastructure, transparent algorithms, and robust ethical and policy frameworks. Interdisciplinary cooperation is key to standardizing data practices, ensuring algorithmic fairness, and safely and responsibly integrating AI into AD management.
The expanding horizons of AI in atopic dermatitis treatment
With the advancement of artificial intelligence technology, its utilization in the management of atopic dermatitis is poised to grow and enhance. Beyond just image recognition and data analysis, artificial intelligence is at the brink of transforming the complete disease management process. From detecting the disease early on to continuously monitoring and tailoring treatment plans, AI’s profound learning abilities will allow it to forecast disease progression and offer personalized risk evaluations and preventive actions by analyzing patient-specific data from multiple dimensions. This predictive power significantly enhances early diagnosis accuracy, enabling preemptive intervention prior to symptom manifestation. Throughout the treatment process, AI will continuously adjust treatment options by analyzing patients’ physiological responses and treatment outcomes in real-time. This approach promotes precision medicine and reduces the occurrence of adverse drug reactions.
In the field of drug discovery, artificial intelligence is anticipated to expedite the development and approval of new drugs, expanding the options for patients to access advanced and efficient treatments. When combined with telemedicine and mobile health technologies, AI will enhance the accessibility of expert medical monitoring and consultations, making top-notch healthcare more readily available and convenient. This integrated strategy for managing diseases aims to empower patients by equipping them with the necessary tools to effectively oversee their health and enhance their overall well-being.
Conclusion
In summary, our study explores the innovative applications of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of atopic dermatitis (AD), highlighting the significant value of AI technology in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, customizing personalized treatment plans, streamlining drug development processes, and facilitating remote medical care. AI technology leverages deep learning, big data analysis, and pattern recognition to notably improve skin lesion recognition, enabling more precise and individualized treatment plans for patients. Furthermore, it optimizes the design and oversight of clinical trials. Despite challenges such as data privacy concerns, algorithm transparency issues, and ethical considerations; the prospects for AI application in AD management are promising with an expected pivotal role in shaping future advancements in skin health care delivery that will ultimately lead to improved medical services quality and enhanced patient quality of life.
Acknowledgments
Fang Cao: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, writing-original draft preparation. Yujie Yang: investigation, original draft preparation. Cui Guo: data curation, methodology. supervision. Hui Zhang: data curation. Qianying Yu: conceptualization. Jing Guo: writing-reviewing and editing. All authors have read and approved the final work.
Funding Statement
This project is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.: 82074443) and Central and Local Governments Lead the Project (No.: 24ZYZYTS0310).
Disclosure statement
All authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Data availability statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
- 1.Biazus Soares G, Hashimoto T, Yosipovitch G.. Atopic dermatitis itch: scratching for an explanation. J Invest Dermatol. 2024;144(5):978–988. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2023.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Choo ZY, Mehlis SL, Joyce JC.. Updates in atopic dermatitis for the primary care physician: a review of advances in the understanding and treatment of atopic dermatitis. Dis Mon. 2024;70(4):101687. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2024.101687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Faye O, Flohr C, Kabashima K, et al. Atopic dermatitis: a global health perspective. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024;38(5):801–811. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nazarian A, Alexis AF.. Diagnosis of allergic dermatoses in skin of color. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024;24(6):317–322. doi: 10.1007/s11882-024-01148-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Afshari M, Kolackova M, Rosecka M, et al. Unraveling the skin: a comprehensive review of atopic dermatitis, current understanding, and approaches. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1361005. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1361005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Trogen B, Jacobs S, Wang J.. Disparities in the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2023;23(1):13–19. doi: 10.1007/s11882-022-01053-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Armario-Hita JC, Galán-Gutiérrez M, Dodero-Anillo JM, et al. Updated review on treatment of atopic dermatitis. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2023;33(3):158–167. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hagenström K, Klinger T, Müller K, et al. Utilization and related harms of systemic glucocorticosteroids for atopic dermatitis: claims data analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2024;191(5):719–727. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ali F, Vyas J, Finlay AY.. Counting the burden: atopic dermatitis and health-related quality of life. Acta Derm Venereol. 2020;100(12):adv00161. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Davis DM, Waldman A, Jacob S, et al. Diagnosis, comorbidity, and psychosocial impact of atopic dermatitis. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2017;36(3):95–99. doi: 10.12788/j.sder.2017.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hogarty DT, Su JC, Phan K, et al. Artificial intelligence in dermatology-where we are and the way to the future: a review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21(1):41–47. doi: 10.1007/s40257-019-00462-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Young AT, Xiong M, Pfau J, et al. Artificial intelligence in dermatology: a primer. J Invest Dermatol. 2020;140(8):1504–1512. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mehta PP, Sun M, Betz-Stablein B, et al. Improving artificial intelligence-based diagnosis on pediatric skin lesions. J Invest Dermatol. 2023;143(8):1423–1429.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2022.08.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sufyan M, Shokat Z, Ashfaq UA.. Artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and therapy: current status and future perspective. Comput Biol Med. 2023;165:107356. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Du-Harpur X, Watt FM, Luscombe NM, et al. What is AI? Applications of artificial intelligence to dermatology. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(3):423–430. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.van der Velden BHM, Kuijf HJ, Gilhuijs KGA, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis. Med Image Anal. 2022;79:102470. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kim EB, Baek YS, Lee O.. Parameter-based transfer learning for severity classification of atopic dermatitis using hyperspectral imaging. Skin Res Technol. 2024;30(4):e13704. doi: 10.1111/srt.13704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Maulana A, Noviandy TR, Suhendra R, et al. Evaluation of atopic dermatitis severity using artificial intelligence. Narra J. 2023;3(3):e511. doi: 10.52225/narra.v3i3.511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bang CH, Yoon JW, Ryu JY, et al. Automated severity scoring of atopic dermatitis patients by a deep neural network. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6049. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85489-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Medela A, Mac Carthy T, Aguilar Robles SA, et al. automatic scoring of atopic dermatitis using deep learning: a pilot study. JID Innov. 2022;2(3):100107. doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2022.100107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Park S, Saw SN, Li X, et al. Model learning analysis of 3D optoacoustic mesoscopy images for the classification of atopic dermatitis. Biomed Opt Express. 2021;12(6):3671–3683. doi: 10.1364/BOE.415105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Burns BL, Rhoads DD, Misra A.. The use of machine learning for image analysis artificial intelligence in clinical microbiology. J Clin Microbiol. 2023;61(9):e0233621. doi: 10.1128/jcm.02336-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dev K, Ho CJH, Bi R, et al. Machine learning assisted handheld confocal Raman micro-spectroscopy for identification of clinically relevant atopic eczema biomarkers. Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(13):4674. doi: 10.3390/s22134674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jiang Z, Li J, Kong N, et al. Accurate diagnosis of atopic dermatitis by combining transcriptome and microbiota data with supervised machine learning. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):290. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04373-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhou B, Zhou N, Liu Y, et al. Identification and validation of CCR5 linking keloid with atopic dermatitis through comprehensive bioinformatics analysis and machine learning. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1309992. PMID: 38476235; PMCID: PMC10927814. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1309992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wu W, Chen G, Zhang Z, et al. Construction and verification of atopic dermatitis diagnostic model based on pyroptosis related biological markers using machine learning methods. BMC Med Genom. 2023;16(1):138. PMID: 37330465; PMCID: PMC10276470. doi: 10.1186/s12920-023-01552-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Miller DD, Brown EW.. Artificial intelligence in medical practice: the question to the answer? Am J Med. 2018;131(2):129–133. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.10.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sulejmani P, Negris O, Aoki V, et al. A large language model artificial intelligence for patient queries in atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024;38(6):e531–e5. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Abdalla M, Chen B, Santiago R, et al. Accuracy of algorithms to identify people with atopic dermatitis in ontario routinely collected health databases. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141(7):1840–1843. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2021.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Acosta JN, Falcone GJ, Rajpurkar P, et al. Multimodal biomedical AI. Nat Med. 2022;28(9):1773–1784. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01981-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Luo N, Zhong X, Su L, et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted dermatology diagnosis: from unimodal to multimodal. Comput Biol Med. 2023;165:107413. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ohta T, Hananoe A, Fukushima-Nomura A, et al. Best practices for multimodal clinical data management and integration: an atopic dermatitis research case. Allergol Int. 2024;73(2):255–263. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2023.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Guimarães P, Batista A, Zieger M, et al. Artificial intelligence in multiphoton tomography: atopic dermatitis diagnosis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):7968. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64937-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mohsen F, Ali H, El Hajj N, et al. Artificial intelligence-based methods for fusion of electronic health records and imaging data. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):17981. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22514-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liang H, Tsui BY, Ni H, et al. Evaluation and accurate diagnoses of pediatric diseases using artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(3):433–438. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0335-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Felmingham C, Pan Y, Kok Y, et al. Improving skin cancer management with artificial intelligence: a pre-post intervention trial of an artificial intelligence system used as a diagnostic aid for skin cancer management in a real-world specialist dermatology setting. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;88(5):1138–1142. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.10.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Huang HY, Nguyen HT, Lin TL, et al. Identification of skin lesions by snapshot hyperspectral imaging. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16(1):217. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zaar O, Larson A, Polesie S, et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of an online artificial intelligence application for skin disease diagnosis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2020;100(16):adv00260. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Subramanian M, Wojtusciszyn A, Favre L, et al. Precision medicine in the era of artificial intelligence: implications in chronic disease management. J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02658-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen ZH, Lin L, Wu CF, et al. Artificial intelligence for assisting cancer diagnosis and treatment in the era of precision medicine. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2021;41(11):1100–1115. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Belge Bilgin G, Bilgin C, Burkett BJ, et al. Theranostics and artificial intelligence: new frontiers in personalized medicine. Theranostics. 2024;14(6):2367–2378. doi: 10.7150/thno.94788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Maintz L, Welchowski T, Herrmann N, et al. Machine learning-based deep phenotyping of atopic dermatitis: severity-associated factors in adolescent and adult patients. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157(12):1414–1424. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yamamoto-Hanada K, Kawakami E, Saito-Abe M, et al. Exploratory analysis of plasma cytokine/chemokine levels in 6-year-old children from a birth cohort study. Cytokine. 2020;130:155051. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2020.155051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mak KK, Pichika MR.. Artificial intelligence in drug development: present status and future prospects. Drug Discov Today. 2019;24(3):773–780. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gupta R, Srivastava D, Sahu M, et al. Artificial intelligence to deep learning: machine intelligence approach for drug discovery. Mol Divers. 2021;25(3):1315–1360. doi: 10.1007/s11030-021-10217-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yamanaka C, Uki S, Kaitoh K, et al. De novo drug design based on patient gene expression profiles via deep learning. Mol Inform. 2023;42(8–9):e2300064. doi: 10.1002/minf.202300064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wang Y, Qin D, Jin L, et al. Caffeoyl malic acid is a potential dual inhibitor targeting TNFα/IL-4 evaluated by a combination strategy of network analysis-deep learning-molecular simulation. Comput Biol Med. 2022;145:105410. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Harrer S, Shah P, Antony B, et al. Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2019;40(8):577–591. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2019.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lin Y, Zhang Y, Wang D, et al. Computer especially AI-assisted drug virtual screening and design in traditional Chinese medicine. Phytomedicine. 2022;107:154481. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Huet F, Faffa MS, Poizeau F, et al. Characteristics of pruritus in relation to self-assessed severity of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99(3):279–283. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wu JJ, Hong CH, Merola JF, et al. Predictors of nonresponse to dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis: a machine learning analysis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022;129(3):354–359.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Li Y, Zhao D, Xu Z, et al. bSRWPSO-FKNN: a boosted PSO with fuzzy K-nearest neighbor classifier for predicting atopic dermatitis disease. Front Neuroinform. 2022;16:1063048. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2022.1063048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Smith AM, Walsh JR, Long J, et al. Standard machine learning approaches outperform deep representation learning on phenotype prediction from transcriptomics data. BMC Bioinformat. 2020;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-3427-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kraepelien M, Hentati A, Kern D, et al. Transforming guided internet interventions into simplified and self-guided digital tools – experiences from three recent projects. Internet Interv. 2023;34:100693. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kern D, Ljótsson B, Lönndahl L, et al. A digital self-help intervention for atopic dermatitis: analysis of secondary outcomes from a feasibility study. JMIR Dermatol. 2023;6:e42360. doi: 10.2196/42360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fasseeh AN, Elezbawy B, Korra N, et al. Burden of atopic dermatitis in adults and adolescents: a systematic literature review. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022;12(12):2653–2668. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00819-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zvulunov A, Lenevich S, Migacheva N.. A mobile health app for facilitating disease management in children with atopic dermatitis: feasibility and impact study. JMIR Dermatol. 2023;6:e49278. doi: 10.2196/49278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tiribelli S, Monnot A, Shah SFH, et al. Ethics principles for artificial intelligence-based telemedicine for public health. Am J Public Health. 2023;113(5):577–584. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zarca K, Charrier N, Mahé E, et al. Tele-expertise for diagnosis of skin lesions is cost-effective in a prison setting: a retrospective cohort study of 450 patients. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0204545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ethier O, Chan HO, Abdolahnejad M, et al. Using computer vision and artificial intelligence to track the healing of severe burns. J Burn Care Res. 2024;45(3):700–708. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yin H, Chen H, Zhang W, et al. Image-based remote evaluation of PASI scores with psoriasis by the YOLO-v4 algorithm. Exp Dermatol. 2024;33(4):e15082. doi: 10.1111/exd.15082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Barakat-Johnson M, Jones A, Burger M, et al. Reshaping wound care: evaluation of an artificial intelligence app to improve wound assessment and management. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024;310:941–945. doi: 10.3233/SHTI231103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.