Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 23;398(5):5611–5628. doi: 10.1007/s00210-024-03631-5

Table 2.

Impact of Dula (50, 100, and 150 μg/kg) on oxidative stress biomarkers (TAC, GSH, SOD, and MDA)

Parameters Groups
Control Dula control AA SLZ+AA Dula 50 μg/kg + AA Dula 100 μg/kg + AA Dula 150 μg/kg + AA
TAC 0.7038 ± 0.03586 0.7165 ± 0.02442 0.3425 ± 0.03312$ 0.6677 ± 0.03928λ 0.5010 ± 0.03562$λϕ 0.5944 ± 0.02876λ 0.6829 ± 0.02002λ∇
GSH 4.487 ± 0.1466 4.092 ± 0.1073 1.011 ± 0.1022$ 3.141 ± 0.2640 1.688 ± 0.1445 2.248 ± 0.2036$λϕ 2.881 ± 0.2421$λ∇
SOD 492.6 ± 14.82 445.8 ± 5.121 250.4 ± 17.58$ 424.3 ± 14.45λ 317.2 ± 23.02 352.8 ± 18.15$λϕ 417.0 ± 15.34$λ∇
MDA 69.31 ± 4.532 70.70 ± 4.638 304.8 ± 19.22$ 97.61 ± 5.359λ 177.7 ± 15.64$λϕ 146.9 ± 12.45 115.6 ± 9.130λ∇

Data were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8)

Dula dulaglutide, AA acetic acid, SLZ sulfasalazine, TAC total antioxidant capacity, MDA malondialdehyde, GSH reduced glutathione, SOD superoxide dismutase

$,λ,ϕ,∇p<0.05, significantly different from the control group, AA-injected group, SLZ-treated group, and Dula 50 μg/kg-injected group, respectively, using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons post hoc test