Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 26;311(4):1111–1125. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-07996-7

Table 3.

Logistic regression analyses for investigation of impact of pre-operative characteristics on risk for failure of treatment. OR (95% CI)

Pre-operative parameter aNo permanent pain reduction (n = 28/110, 25.5%) bGC not improved (n = 37/122, 30.3%) cInfertility not overcome (n=29/62, 46.8%) dReoperation (n=25/122, 20.5%)
Age per year

0.933 (0.876–0.993)

p = 0.029

1.041 (0.989–1.095)

p=0.124

1.169 (1.051–1.301)

p=0.004

0.995 (0.940–1.054)

p=0.873

Obesity (BMI > 30)

0.637 (0.195–2.085)

p = 0.456

0.774 (0.278–2.154)

p=0.624

2.652 (0.610–11.519)

p=0.193

0.525 (0.143–1.932)

p=0.332

Smoking

2.011 (0.814–4.963)

p = 0.130

0.624 (0.287–1.358)

p=0.235

0.796 (0.278–2.285)

p=0.672

1.353 (0.553–3.307)

p=0.507

Higher education

1.765 (0.737–4.230)

p = 0.202

1.239 (0.555–2.768)

p=0.601

0.519 (0.176–1.532)

p=0.235

0.872 (0.341–2.228)

p=0.775

Physical acitivity ≥ 1x weekly

0.640 (0.270–1.518)

p = 0.311

0.747 (0.342–1.629)

p=0.463

1.926 (0.653–5.682)

p=0.235

2.048 (0.784–5.351)

p=0.144

Permanent partnership

0.417 (0.141–1.229)

p = 0.113

0.571 (0.199–1.640)

p=0.298

0.460 (0.103–2.056)

p=0.309

0.565 (0.179–1.786)

p=0.331

rASRM-Score I vs. IV

1.796 (0.589–5.471)

p=0.303

1.571 (0.524–4.711)

p=0.420

0.606 (0.158–2.319)

p=0.464

1.080 (0.296–3.946)

p=0.907

rASRM-Score II vs. IV

0.735 (0.163–3.308)

p=0.688

1.786 (0.519–6.141)

p=0.358

0.909 (0.158–2.319)

p=0.901

1.687 (0.422–6.743)

p=0.459

rASRM-Score III vs. IV

1.071 (0.289–3.973)

p=0.918

2.551 (0.794–8.192)

p=0.116

1.515 (0.286–8.032)

p=0.625

2.224 (0.607–8.144)

p=0.228

CPP

3.869 (1.07113.981)

p=0.039

0.724 (0.322–1.626)

p=0.434

1.235 (0.410–3.720)

p=0.708

7.407 (1.65133.239)

p=0.009

Dysmenorrhoe

1.213 (0.237–6.215)

p=0.817

0.281 (0.1000.784)

p=0.015

0.481 (0.081–2.862)

p=0.421

1.341 (0.356–5.051)

p=0.664

Dispareunia

0.691 (0.288–1.661)

p=0.409

0.440 (0.2000.967)

p=0.041

0.909 (0.310–2.669)

p=0.862

3.321 (1.1529.569)

p=0.026

Hypermenorrhoe

1.270 (0.535–3.015)

p=0.588

0.830 (0.383–1.800)

p=0.637

1.635 (0.573–4.660)

p=0.358

1.733 (0.709–4.238)

0.228

Infertility

1.472 (0.615–3.525)

p=0.386

0.646 (0.297–1.406)

p=0.271

0.709 (0.293–1.716)

p=0.445

gCOC*

1.500 (0.413–5.450)

p=0.538

2.133 (0.671–6.779)

p=0.199

3.818 (0.936–15.579)

p=0.062

hProgestin*

0.857 (0.314–2.337)

p=0.763

0.731 (0.298–1.795)

p=0.495

2.567 (0.815–8.082)

p=0.107

pre-operative NRS pain score per point

0.968 (0.944–0.992)

p=0.009

0.978 (0.965–0.992)

p = 0.002

1.002 (0.981–1.024)

p = 0.829

1.041 (1.0111.072)

p = 0.008

CPP chronic pelvic pain. Bold numbers indicate statistical significance (p ≤ 0.05)

aFailure in permanent pain reduction was assumed if individual improvement of NRS Score at time of interview was lower than 20 points compared to pre-operative value. Median time between surgery and interview was 6 years (range 4.3–7.8). Only patients with a pre-operative NRS Score of > 20 were included

bPatients who answered “no” when questioned “Do you think your quality of life has improved after surgery?”, GC subjective general condition

cNo live birth after endometriosis surgery in patients with infertility before treatment

dNeed for repeated endometriosis surgery

gCombined oral contraceptives

hOral progestin or hormonal intrauterine device

*two patients were excluded who had bilateral adnexectomy and subsequent HRT with pure estradiol