Table 4.
Multivariate logistic regression analyses for investigation of impact of pre-operative characteristics on risk for failure of treatment
| OR (95% CI) p value |
aNo permanent pain reduction (n = 28/110) | bGC not improved (n = 37/122) | cReoperation (n=25/122) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age per year |
0.912 (0.850–0.980) p = 0.012 |
– | – |
| CPP |
5.544 (1.338–22.965) p = 0.018 |
– |
5.191 (1.100–24.501) p = 0.038 |
| Dysmenorrhoe | – |
0.239 (0.055–1.034) p = 0.056 |
– |
| Dispareunia | – |
0.697 (0.277–1.753) p = 0.443 |
2.400 (0.786–7.335) p=0.124 |
| Pre-operative NRS pain score per point |
0.925 (0.944–0.982) p = 0.002 |
0.985 (0.961–1.010) p = 0.228 |
1.034 (1.000–1.070) p = 0.053 |
CPP chronic pelvic pain. Bold numbers indicate statistical significance (p ≤ 0.05)
aNo permanent pain reduction was assumed if individual improvement of NRS Score at time of interview was lower than 20 points compared to pre-operative value. Median time between surgery and interview was 6 years (range 4.3–7.8). Only patients with a pre-operative NRS Score of > 20 were included
bPatients who answered “no” when questioned “Do you think your quality of life has improved after surgery?”, GC subjective general condition
cNeed for repeated endometriosis surgery