Abstract
Asthma is a heterogenous inflammatory bronchial disease involving complex mechanisms, several inflammatory pathways, and multiples cell-type networks. Bronchial inflammation associated to asthma is consecutive to multiple aggressions on epithelium, such as microbiologic, pollutant, and antigenic agents, which are responsible for both T2 and non-T2 inflammatory responses and further airway remodeling. Because asthma physiopathology involves multiple crosstalk between several cell types from different origins (epithelial, mesenchymal, and immune cells) and numerous cellular effectors, no single and/or representative in vitro model is suitable to study the overall of this disease. In this short review, we present and discuss the advantages and limitations of different in vitro models to decipher different aspects of virus-related asthma physiopathology and exacerbation.
Keywords: asthma, viral infection, in vitro model, exacerbation, physiopathology
1. Introduction
Asthma affects more than 300 million individuals worldwide (1) and is characterized by airway obstruction, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and bronchial inflammation. Asthma is schematically separated into two main immune and inflammatory-related phenotypes. The most prevalent is the T2-high phenotype, which involves allergic and/or eosinophilic inflammation, involving mainly Th2 lymphocytes, basophils, eosinophils, mast cells, and type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2). By contrast, the T2-low inflammatory phenotype is driven by Th17 lymphocytes and/or neutrophils and is characterized by the absence of allergy, eosinophilic inflammation, and other T2 determinants, such as high FeNO levels, nasal polyposis, or atopic dermatitis (2). In some cases, when both neutrophil and eosinophil infiltration in the airways is low, the condition is called a mixed or pauci-granulocytic phenotype (3). A major burden of the disease is the occurrence of acute clinical events, known as asthma exacerbations, which are associated with an increase in bronchial inflammation in response to various environmental stimuli (4–6). Among these stimuli, allergens, pollutants, bacteria, and viruses are largely implicated and responsible for initiating the inflammatory cascade. They activate three main epithelial alarmins: thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), IL-33, and IL-25, which activate dendritic cells, ILC2, macrophages, T cells, and mast cells (7, 8). Respiratory viral infections are a leading cause of asthma exacerbation, with human rhinovirus (HRV) being the most commonly implicated, followed by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (9) and, to a lesser extent, human metapneumovirus (hMPV) and influenza viruses (9, 10). The virus-related mechanisms of asthma exacerbation are not yet fully understood and the development of relevant in vitro models to study virus/asthma functional relationships remains a significant challenge. In this short review, we summarize and discuss the advantages and limitations of the commonly used in vitro models for studying asthma and its exacerbation by viral infections.
2. Monoculture cell line models
The simplest models involve human bronchial cell lines cultured in medium or at the air–liquid interface (ALI). Some of these cell lines, such as CaLu-3 and 16HBE, express tight junction (TJ) proteins, which are key determinants of epithelium permeability and integrity (11, 12). Disrupted TJs are observed in the bronchial epithelium of asthmatic patients, significantly affecting respiratory airway barrier function (13). Studies using allergens, nanoparticles, or cigarette smoke extract have shown an increase in transepithelial permeability through the disruption of TJs on CaLu-3 (14, 15) and 16HBE (16, 17). Therefore, measuring TJ integrity and exploring functional interactions with respiratory viruses in permissive epithelial cells (Table 1) should be considered, especially as HRV, RSV, hMPV, influenza, and coronaviruses are known to target specific TJ proteins (18–21). However, although airway epithelial cell lines are more accessible than primary cells and can be cultured in ALI models to study host responses to viral infections (22), they are less physiologically relevant due to the lack of cell diversity (i.e., only ciliated cells are present, with no secretory or basal cells) (23, 24) and the absence of cell lines from asthmatic patients.
Table 1.
Common cells used in asthma studies and susceptible to respiratory viruses.
3. Primary cell-based ALI human airway models
Primary bronchial epithelial cells (PBECs) are more relevant models, as they are directly recovered from patient biopsies, including those with asthma or other pulmonary diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). PBECs can be cultured in submerged mono-cultures or in an air–liquid interface as a pseudostratified human airway epithelium (HAE) that includes several types of differentiated cells (ciliated, club, goblet, and basal) (37). These models allow for the investigation of a broader range of functional and physiological characteristics, including morphology, transepithelial electrical resistance, tight junction integrity, mucus secretion, cilia clearance, innate immune response (38, 39), sensitivity to allergens or respiratory viruses (Table 1), and transcriptomic signatures (40). As such, PBECs are widely used to study asthma physiopathology and exacerbation (41, 42). For example, the T2 associated IL-13 cytokine has been extensively studied for its ability to modulate gene expression profiles (43) and alter mucin production in primary cell-based ALI models (44), which are features of asthma physiopathology.
Moreover, HAE models are well-suited for investigating asthma exacerbation related to viral infection, as asthmatic patients exhibit physiological impairments that can be measured in HAE. These impairments include alterations in tight junctions and epithelium integrity (20, 21, 45), modifications in mucus production, mucociliary function (46–49), and aberrant epithelial tissue repair and remodeling through epithelial-mesenchymal transition (50–52).
Furthermore, PBECs can also react to viral infections through the innate immune response, which is an important factor in asthma exacerbation (8, 53, 54), as respiratory viruses are known to suppress antiviral responses and enhance inflammation in epithelial cells (55–57). For example, Wark et al. demonstrated an impairment of interferon beta (IFN-β) in ALI cultures from asthmatic patient PBECs compared to healthy controls during HRV infection (36). Consistently, the addition of IFN-β restored the expression of antiviral genes against HRV in asthmatic PBECs, thereby reducing the duration of inflammation (58). In addition, viral double-stranded RNA induces a stronger expression of the alarmin TSLP, an important enhancer of asthma exacerbation through the induction of the T2 inflammatory pathway, in asthmatic PBEC-based ALI compared to healthy controls (59). These results are similar to those obtained with HAE models infected by different respiratory viral infections, such as RSV (60), HRV (61), and SARS-CoV-2 (62).
4. ALI models co-cultivated with primary cells of different origins
Asthma is a complex lung disease that involves not only epithelial cells but also immune cells implicated in inflammation, viral clearance, and remodeling processes. In addition, mesenchymal cells, such as fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells, contribute to tissue inflammation and physiopathology (63). In this context, co-cultured primary cells of different origins can be very useful for investigating cellular crosstalk and their respective contributions to asthma development and exacerbation (Table 2). The ability of respiratory viruses to impair host immune responses, thereby increasing the risk of asthma exacerbation (64–67), underscores the need for further investigation into the functional relationships between epithelial, mesenchymal, and immune cells within integrated in vitro asthma models. In this regard, Transwell® cell separation system used for ALI cultures (68) allows for the co-cultivation of epithelial cells in the open air with other types of primary cells, whether adherent or not, on the lower surface of the Transwell®. Furthermore, co-culture models with direct contact between primary cells can be highly beneficial for mimicking in vivo crosstalk.
Table 2.
3D co-culture models used to study asthma physiopathology and exacerbation.
3D co-cultures models | Cell origins | Conclusions | References |
---|---|---|---|
PBEC and fibroblast | Healthy donor cells | Activation of smooth muscle through TGF-β2 secreted from injured epithelial cells | (69) |
BEAS-2B or PBEC and airway smooth muscle cells | Healthy donor for smooth muscle cells | Proliferation of smooth muscle and stimulation of pro-inflammatory genes expression | (70) |
16HBE and HUVECs cells | Cell lines | Proliferation of endothelial cells and expression of E-selectin and ICAM-I | (71) |
PBEC and macrophages | Healthy donor cells | Inflammation and viral clearance | (72) |
PBEC and macrophages and dendritic cells | PBECs from healthy, asthmatic, COPD donors | Inflammation | (73) |
PBEC and fibroblast and eosinophils | Healthy donor cells | Epithelium remodeling and inflammation | (74) |
PBEC and PBMC/lymphocytes | Healthy donor cells | Inflammation, exacerbation and viral clearance | (75–77) |
PBEC and neutrophils | Healthy donor cells | Neutrophils infiltration induced by HRV infection | (78) |
Organoids and macrophages | Healthy donor cells | Increase of pro-inflammatory proteins with macrophages | (79) |
Organoids and resident T lymphocytes | Healthy donor cells | T lymphocytes activation after SARS-CoV-2 infection | (80) |
PBEC, primary bronchial epithelial cell; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell.
4.1. Co-culture of ALI airway models with mesenchymal cells
ALI co-culture models of healthy airway epithelium with fibroblast cells adhering to the lower surface of Transwell® have highlighted that chemical injury to the epithelium leads to the secretion of TGF-β2 by fibroblasts, which in turn triggers the expression of several asthma markers, such as Tenascin-C and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) (69), as observed in the bronchus of asthmatic patients (81). In a similar model, Reeves et al. reported that fibroblasts secrete more hyaluronan when co-cultured with asthmatic ALI airway epithelium compared to healthy tissue, thereby promoting inflammation by increasing leukocyte binding. In this study, bronchial epithelial cells were co-cultured with human lung fibroblasts with Fibroblast Growth Media (FGM-2) and PneumaCult ALI for 96 h (82). Consistently, fibroblasts infected by RSV also secreted more hyaluronan, promoting mast cell binding and protease production, which are both known to contribute to asthma inflammation (83).
Co-culture models of epithelial cells with healthy smooth muscle cells in various culture media have been developed to study cell proliferation and pro-inflammatory responses (70), in line with their role in asthma physiopathology through bronchoconstriction and airway tissue remodeling (84). In addition, the monocyte migration chemokine CCL5 was reported to be significantly more expressed in asthmatic smooth muscle cells than in healthy ones when the ALI model was infected by HRV. This aligns with the increased risk of asthma exacerbation observed through monocyte migration in infected asthma patients (85). On the other hand, co-culturing asthmatic smooth muscle cells with bronchial epithelial cells increases their susceptibility to HRV infection compared to co-cultures with healthy smooth muscle cells, with an increased expression of CCL20 by smooth muscle cells altering the antiviral PKR/eIF2 pathway within epithelial cells (86).
Endothelial cells are also important for tissue inflammation by binding factors on the surface membrane that enhance leukocyte infiltration (87). A co-culture model involving epithelial 16HBE and endothelial HUVECs, stimulated with virus mimicking double-stranded RNA, showed an increased expression of leukocyte-recruiting adhesion molecules (E-selectin and ICAM-I) on endothelial cells. In this study, Blume et al. co-cultured human bronchial epithelial cells in minimum essential medium (MEM) with Glutamax and serum, and HUVEC cells in M199 medium supplemented with L-Glutamine seeded at the basal side, for up to 8 days (71). Similar results were obtained when healthy ALI cultures were infected with SARS-CoV-2 (88).
Finally, ALI co-culture models are not only suitable for studying crosstalk between epithelial and mesenchymal cells involved in bronchial inflammation and immune cell recruitment, but they are also essential for characterizing the epithelium’s sensibility to viral infections. This makes them highly interesting for deciphering virus-related mechanisms that lead to asthma exacerbation.
4.2. Co-culture of ALI airway models and immune cells
ALI airway models co-cultured with additional immune cell components are even more suitable for studying the mechanisms underlying asthma physiopathology. After initial epithelial cell injuries, immunes cells are recruited, activated, and amplify bronchial inflammatory cascades that can lead to asthma exacerbation and tissue remodeling. In this context, M1- or M2-type polarized macrophages contribute to determining the asthma phenotype (89) and exacerbation in cases where viral clearance is delayed (90).
Using Transwell® co-culture, Ronaghan et al. co-cultured human bronchial epithelial cells in ALI with macrophages in PneumaCult ALI medium or ImmunoCult-SF Macrophage Medium (IMM) for 72 h (72). They reported that M1 macrophage polarization reduced RSV infection in healthy PBECs ALI cultures, but not M2 polarization (72). These results are consistent with the predominance of M2 macrophages in asthmatic patients (91), which are associated with decreased in vivo interferon secretion and the promotion of T2 cytokines. This could help explain why asthmatics are more susceptible to RSV infection and related asthma exacerbation (92).
Other studies have developed more complex models by co-cultivating three different cell types. Paplinska-Goryca et al. used PBECs from healthy, asthmatic, or COPD patients in co-culture with macrophages on apical side and dendritic cells in the lower surface of Transwell®. This model highlighted the importance of immune cells and the origin of PBECs in the expression of alarmins when epithelium was exposed to double-stranded RNA stimulation (93). Similarly, Choe et al. showed the importance of eosinophils in airway epithelium remodeling and inflammation through a co-culture model of epithelial and fibroblast cells with eosinophils. Briefly, eosinophils, isolated from human venous blood, were seeded on top of the epithelium with RPMI 1640 medium. After 2 h of incubation and medium removal, eosinophils were stimulated with calcium ionophore for 48 h of co-culture (74). This co-culture model provides information about lung epithelium remodeling mechanisms in asthmatics (51).
Co-culturing peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at the lower surface of the Transwell® allows for the inclusion of a broader range of immune cells, enabling the study of crosstalk between epithelial cells and lymphocytes or natural killer (NK) cells. Several studies have focused on the T1/T2 balance and inflammatory cytokines, such as IP-10 and IFN-γ, during influenza and HRV infections of healthy nasal epithelium co-cultivated with PBMC in RPMI supplemented with serum for 48 h (75, 76). Qin et al. reported that RSV infection of healthy bronchial ALI cultures promotes an increase in Th2 cell populations from co-cultivated PBMC (77). Although NK cell polarization is known to be important for viral clearance and inflammation control through the secretion of IFN-γ or IL-4 and by killing eosinophils and neutrophils (94–96), their role in asthma physiopathology and exacerbation is not fully understood. To explore this further, co-culture models of human nasal epithelial cells with PBMC have been used to highlight NK cell activation after influenza infection (76). Future co-culture models with HAE and purified NK cells are needed to further study their role in asthma exacerbation during viral infections.
5. Organoids
Organoids are three-dimensional structures derived from stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cells, which harbor some of the structural and functional characteristics of organs, including the bronchus, to study airway development and physiopathology (97–100). These organoids are spherical, with a lumen at the sphere’s center or epithelial cells exposed at the surface (101), allowing them to be permissive to respiratory viruses like RSV (102, 103), SARS-CoV-2 (102, 104, 105), HMPV (106), influenza (104), or human parainfluenza 3 virus (107). Studies using healthy organoids have focused on aspects of asthma pathology, including goblet cell metaplasia (108) and remodeling (109).
Organoids co-cultured with immune cells are also being developed to mimic functional cell–cell interactions. Various methods have been explored: (i) seeding immune cells and lung stem cells together, (ii) co-cultivation of organoids with isolated immune cells, (iii) injecting immune cells into the organoid lumens, and (iv) expanding cultures from tissue samples that include both epithelial and resident immunes cells (110). Seo et al. co-cultivated macrophages with organoids and stimulated them with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to model alveolar inflammation. They showed an increase in pro-inflammatory protein expression in the presence of macrophages, supporting the relevance of such organoid models (79). Organoids with resident immune cells have also been used to study SARS-CoV-2 infection and the corresponding T lymphocyte response (80), making these models promising for studying the crosstalk between resident immune cells and lung tissue. However, the development of organoid models using cells from asthmatic patients is currently lacking whereas they would be useful to complement the ALI models to further decipher viral mediated mechanisms associated with this pathology.
6. Lung-on-chip
Microfluidic systems, known as lung-on-chip models, are more complex systems that enable the movement of cells and media on the basal side, or the exposure of stimuli by injecting air onto the apical side of the airway (111, 112). For example, a lung-on-chip system with a co-culture of lung epithelium and circulating neutrophils in the basal medium was used to explore the mechanism behind asthma exacerbation induced by HRV infection. Briefly, the epithelium was cultivated in ALI on the surface of the chip membrane. On the other side, endothelial cells were cultivated in the vascular channel of the chip. After HRV inoculation at the apical side of the epithelium, neutrophils isolated from human peripheral blood were added to the chip’s reservoirs and perfused in RPMI 1640 (78). Studies have shown that neutrophil infiltration into the epithelium, a factor of neutrophilic asthma exacerbation, was induced by HRV infection and significantly increased with IL-13 stimulation (78). Another innovative system, known as “breathing lung-on-cheap,” mimics breathing and has been used to evaluate the effects of toxic particles potentially involved in the development and/or exacerbation of asthma (113). This model could be interesting when studying the impact of respiratory volume on asthmatic epithelium infection and asthma exacerbation. However, further development is needed to incorporate cells from patients.
7. Discussion
In vitro 3D airway models offer significant advantages compared to monolayer cell line-based in vitro models (Figure 1). Airway epithelial functions, including relevant inflammatory and antiviral responses, are reconstituted with a large variety of primary cells from healthy individuals of different ages and/or from patients with various bronchial diseases, such as asthma or COPD. This makes ALI and organoid models valuable and complementary tools for studying the complex mechanisms involved in asthma and its exacerbations. However, further development of and characterization of co-culture models involving mesenchymal and immune cells are needed to better understand key aspects of asthma physiopathology, such as inflammation, immune cell polarization, and tissue remodeling, leading to the development of new therapeutic approaches.
Figure 1.
Advantages and limitations of in vitro models for the study of asthma exacerbation.
In conclusion, ALI co-culture models, organoids, and lung-on-chip systems are highly effective tools for studying asthma and its exacerbation from viral infections. With a diverse range of models available, each offering unique strengths and limitations, the choice of the most suitable in vitro model will depend on its relevance and ability to complement others in revealing various aspects of virus-induced asthma pathophysiology and exacerbation.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Andrés Pizzorno for editing the language of this article.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Author contributions
RP: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CD: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GD: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MR-C: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1.Brusselle GG, Koppelman GH. Biologic therapies for severe asthma. N Engl J Med. (2022) 386(2):157–71. 10.1056/NEJMra2032506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Habib N, Pasha MA, Tang DD. Current understanding of asthma pathogenesis and biomarkers. Cells. (2022) 11(17):2764. 10.3390/cells11172764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu T, Woodruff PG, Zhou X. Advances in non-type 2 severe asthma: from molecular insights to novel treatment strategies. Eur Respir J. (2024) 64(2):2300826. 10.1183/13993003.00826-2023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aghasafari P, George U, Pidaparti R. A review of inflammatory mechanism in airway diseases. Inflamm Res. (2019) 68(1):59–74. 10.1007/s00011-018-1191-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Calvén J, Ax E, Rådinger M. The airway epithelium—a central player in asthma pathogenesis. IJMS. (2020) 21(23):8907. 10.3390/ijms21238907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang Y, Bai C, Li K, Adler KB, Wang X. Role of airway epithelial cells in development of asthma and allergic rhinitis. Respir Med. (2008) 102(7):949–55. 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.01.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gauvreau GM, Sehmi R, Ambrose CS, Griffiths JM. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin: its role and potential as a therapeutic target in asthma. Expert Opin Ther Targets. (2020) 24(8):777–92. 10.1080/14728222.2020.1783242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jartti T, Bønnelykke K, Elenius V, Feleszko W. Role of viruses in asthma. Semin Immunopathol. (2020) 42(1):61–74. 10.1007/s00281-020-00781-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Papadopoulos NG, Christodoulou I, Rohde G, Agache I, Almqvist C, Bruno A, et al. Viruses and bacteria in acute asthma exacerbations – A GA 2 LEN-DARE* systematic review. Allergy. (2011 Apr) 66(4):458–68. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02505.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Williams JV, Crowe JE, Jr, Enriquez R, Minton P, Peebles RS, Jr, Hamilton RG, et al. Human metapneumovirus infection plays an etiologic role in acute asthma exacerbations requiring hospitalization in adults. J Infect Dis. (2005) 192(7):1149–53. 10.1086/444392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Godbole NM, Chowdhury AA, Chataut N, Awasthi S. Tight junctions, the epithelial barrier, and toll-like receptor-4 during lung injury. Inflammation. (2022) 45(6):2142–62. 10.1007/s10753-022-01708-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wittekindt OH. Tight junctions in pulmonary epithelia during lung inflammation. Pflugers Arch. (2017) 469(1):135–47. 10.1007/s00424-016-1917-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Heijink IH, Kuchibhotla VNS, Roffel MP, Maes T, Knight DA, Sayers I, et al. Epithelial cell dysfunction, a major driver of asthma development. Allergy. (2020) 75(8):1902–17. 10.1111/all.14421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Banga A, Witzmann FA, Petrache HI, Blazer-Yost BL. Functional effects of nanoparticle exposure on calu-3 airway epithelial cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. (2012) 29(1–2):197–212. 10.1159/000337601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vinhas R, Cortes L, Cardoso I, Mendes VM, Manadas B, Todo-Bom A, et al. Pollen proteases compromise the airway epithelial barrier through degradation of transmembrane adhesion proteins and lung bioactive peptides: role of pollen proteases on allergic disorders. Allergy. (2011) 66(8):1088–98. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02598.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gangl K, Reininger R, Bernhard D, Campana R, Pree I, Reisinger J, et al. Cigarette smoke facilitates allergen penetration across respiratory epithelium. Allergy. (2009) 64(3):398–405. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01861.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Heijink IH, Brandenburg SM, Postma DS, Van Oosterhout AJM. Cigarette smoke impairs airway epithelial barrier function and cell-cell contact recovery. Eur Respir J. (2012) 39(2):419–28. 10.1183/09031936.00193810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pharo EA, Williams SM, Boyd V, Sundaramoorthy V, Durr PA, Baker ML. Host–pathogen responses to pandemic influenza H1N1pdm09 in a human respiratory airway model. Viruses. (2020) 12(6):679. 10.3390/v12060679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rezaee F, Harford TJ, Linfield DT, Altawallbeh G, Midura RJ, Ivanov AI, et al. cAMP-dependent activation of protein kinase A attenuates respiratory syncytial virus-induced human airway epithelial barrier disruption. PLoS One. (2017) 12(7):e0181876. 10.1371/journal.pone.0181876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Short KR, Kasper J, Van Der Aa S, Andeweg AC, Zaaraoui-Boutahar F, Goeijenbier M, et al. Influenza virus damages the alveolar barrier by disrupting epithelial cell tight junctions. Eur Respir J. (2016) 47(3):954–66. 10.1183/13993003.01282-2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Teoh KT, Siu YL, Chan WL, Schlüter MA, Liu CJ, Peiris JSM, et al. The SARS coronavirus E protein interacts with PALS1 and alters tight junction formation and epithelial morphogenesis. MBoC. (2010) 21(22):3838–52. 10.1091/mbc.e10-04-0338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harcourt JL, Caidi H, Anderson LJ, Haynes LM. Evaluation of the calu-3 cell line as a model of in vitro respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Virol Methods. (2011) 174(1–2):144–9. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.03.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Grainger CI, Greenwell LL, Lockley DJ, Martin GP, Forbes B. Culture of calu-3 cells at the air interface provides a representative model of the airway epithelial barrier. Pharm Res. (2006) 23(7):1482–90. 10.1007/s11095-006-0255-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kreft ME, Jerman UD, Lasič E, Hevir-Kene N, Rižner TL, Peternel L, et al. The characterization of the human cell line calu-3 under different culture conditions and its use as an optimized in vitro model to investigate bronchial epithelial function. Eur J Pharm Sci. (2015) 69:1–9. 10.1016/j.ejps.2014.12.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Böttcher-Friebertshäuser E, Stein DA, Klenk HD, Garten W. Inhibition of influenza virus infection in human airway cell cultures by an antisense peptide-conjugated morpholino oligomer targeting the hemagglutinin-activating protease TMPRSS2. J Virol. (2011) 85(4):1554–62. 10.1128/JVI.01294-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kawase M, Shirato K, Van Der Hoek L, Taguchi F, Matsuyama S. Simultaneous treatment of human bronchial epithelial cells with serine and cysteine protease inhibitors prevents severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus entry. J Virol. (2012) 86(12):6537–45. 10.1128/JVI.00094-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rajan D, McCracken CE, Kopleman HB, Kyu SY, Lee FEH, Lu X, et al. Human rhinovirus induced cytokine/chemokine responses in human airway epithelial and immune cells. PLoS One. (2014) 9(12):e114322. 10.1371/journal.pone.0114322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Comstock AT, Ganesan S, Chattoraj A, Faris AN, Margolis BL, Hershenson MB, et al. Rhinovirus-Induced barrier dysfunction in polarized airway epithelial cells is mediated by NADPH oxidase 1. J Virol. (2011) 85(13):6795–808. 10.1128/JVI.02074-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Najjar F E, Cifuentes-Muñoz N, Chen J, Zhu H, Buchholz UJ, Moncman CL, et al. Human metapneumovirus induces reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton for direct cell-to-cell spread. PLoS Pathog. (2016) 12(9):e1005922. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kong M, Whitley R, Peng N, Oster R, Schoeb T, Sullender W, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 mediates RSV infection in vitro and in vivo. Viruses. (2015) 7(8):4230–53. 10.3390/v7082817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Liao Y, Li X, Mou T, Zhou X, Li D, Wang L, et al. Distinct infection process of SARS-CoV-2 in human bronchial epithelial cell lines. J Med Virol. (2020) 92(11):2830–8. 10.1002/jmv.26200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Aguiar JA, Tremblay BJM, Mansfield MJ, Woody O, Lobb B, Banerjee A, et al. Gene expression and in situ protein profiling of candidate SARS-CoV-2 receptors in human airway epithelial cells and lung tissue. Eur Respir J. (2020) 56(3):2001123. 10.1183/13993003.01123-2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bao X, Liu T, Spetch L, Kolli D, Garofalo RP, Casola A. Airway epithelial cell response to human metapneumovirus infection. Virology. (2007) 368(1):91–101. 10.1016/j.virol.2007.06.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chan M, Cheung C, Chui W, Tsao S, Nicholls J, Chan Y, et al. Proinflammatory cytokine responses induced by influenza A (H5N1) viruses in primary human alveolar and bronchial epithelial cells. Respir Res. (2005) 6(1):135. 10.1186/1465-9921-6-135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Villenave R, Thavagnanam S, Sarlang S, Parker J, Douglas I, Skibinski G, et al. In vitro modeling of respiratory syncytial virus infection of pediatric bronchial epithelium, the primary target of infection in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2012) 109(13):5040–5. 10.1073/pnas.1110203109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wark PAB, Johnston SL, Bucchieri F, Powell R, Puddicombe S, Laza-Stanca V, et al. Asthmatic bronchial epithelial cells have a deficient innate immune response to infection with rhinovirus. J Exp Med. (2005) 201(6):937–47. 10.1084/jem.20041901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cao X, Coyle JP, Xiong R, Wang Y, Heflich RH, Ren B, et al. Invited review: human air-liquid-interface organotypic airway tissue models derived from primary tracheobronchial epithelial cells—overview and perspectives. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Animal. (2021) 57(2):104–32. 10.1007/s11626-020-00517-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Müller L, Brighton LE, Carson JL, Fischer Ii WA, Jaspers I. Culturing of human nasal epithelial cells at the air liquid interface. J Vis Exp. (2013) 80:50646. 10.3791/50646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rayner RE, Makena P, Prasad GL, Cormet-Boyaka E. Optimization of normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cell 3D cultures for in vitro lung model studies. Sci Rep. (2019) 9(1):500. 10.1038/s41598-018-36735-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pezzulo AA, Starner TD, Scheetz TE, Traver GL, Tilley AE, Harvey BG, et al. The air-liquid interface and use of primary cell cultures are important to recapitulate the transcriptional profile of in vivo airway epithelia. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. (2011) 300(1):L25–31. 10.1152/ajplung.00256.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chortarea S, Barosova H, Clift MJD, Wick P, Petri-Fink A, Rothen-Rutishauser B. Human asthmatic bronchial cells are more susceptible to subchronic repeated exposures of aerosolized carbon nanotubes at occupationally relevant doses than healthy cells. ACS Nano. (2017) 11(8):7615–25. 10.1021/acsnano.7b01992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kooter I, Ilves M, Gröllers-Mulderij M, Duistermaat E, Tromp PC, Kuper F, et al. Molecular signature of asthma-enhanced sensitivity to CuO nanoparticle aerosols from 3D cell model. ACS Nano. (2019) 13(6):6932–46. 10.1021/acsnano.9b01823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Schleimer RP, Kato A, Kern R, Kuperman D, Avila PC. Epithelium: at the interface of innate and adaptive immune responses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2007) 120(6):1279–84. 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhen G, Park SW, Nguyenvu LT, Rodriguez MW, Barbeau R, Paquet AC, et al. IL-13 and epidermal growth factor receptor have critical but distinct roles in epithelial cell mucin production. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. (2007) 36(2):244–53. 10.1165/rcmb.2006-0180OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Xiao C, Puddicombe SM, Field S, Haywood J, Broughton-Head V, Puxeddu I, et al. Defective epithelial barrier function in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2011) 128(3):549–556.e12. 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.05.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dunnill MS. The pathology of asthma, with special reference to changes in the bronchial Mucosa. J Clin Pathol. (1960) 13(1):27–33. 10.1136/jcp.13.1.27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gaillard D, Jouet JB, Egreteau L, Plotkowski L, Zahm JM, Benali R, et al. Airway epithelial damage and inflammation in children with recurrent bronchitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (1994) 150(3):810–7. 10.1164/ajrccm.150.3.8087356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Laitinen LA, Heino M, Laitinen A, Kava T, Haahtela T. Damage of the airway epithelium and bronchial reactivity in patients with asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis. (1985) 131(4):599–606. 10.1164/arrd.1985.131.4.599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Look DC, Walter MJ, Williamson MR, Pang L, You Y, Sreshta JN, et al. Effects of paramyxoviral infection on airway epithelial cell Foxj1 expression, ciliogenesis, and mucociliary function. Am J Pathol. (2001) 159(6):2055–69. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63057-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Davies DE. The role of the epithelium in airway remodeling in asthma. Proc Am Thorac Soc. (2009) 6(8):678–82. 10.1513/pats.200907-067DP [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hough KP, Curtiss ML, Blain TJ, Liu RM, Trevor J, Deshane JS, et al. Airway remodeling in asthma. Front Med. (2020) 7:191. 10.3389/fmed.2020.00191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pain M, Bermudez O, Lacoste P, Royer PJ, Botturi K, Tissot A, et al. Tissue remodelling in chronic bronchial diseases: from the epithelial to mesenchymal phenotype. Eur Respir Rev. (2014) 23(131):118–30. 10.1183/09059180.00004413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cerato JA, Da Silva EF, Porto BN. Breaking bad: inflammasome activation by respiratory viruses. Biology (Basel). (2023) 12(7):943. 10.3390/biology12070943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Oliver BGG, Robinson P, Peters M, Black J. Viral infections and asthma: an inflammatory interface? Eur Respir J. (2014) 44(6):1666–81. 10.1183/09031936.00047714 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gambadauro A, Galletta F, Li Pomi A, Manti S, Piedimonte G. Immune response to respiratory viral infections. IJMS. (2024) 25(11):6178. 10.3390/ijms25116178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kikkert M. Innate immune evasion by human respiratory RNA viruses. J Innate Immun. (2020) 12(1):4–20. 10.1159/000503030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Newton AH, Cardani A, Braciale TJ. The host immune response in respiratory virus infection: balancing virus clearance and immunopathology. Semin Immunopathol. (2016 Jul) 38(4):471–82. 10.1007/s00281-016-0558-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Cakebread JA, Xu Y, Grainge C, Kehagia V, Howarth PH, Holgate ST, et al. Exogenous IFN-β has antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties in primary bronchial epithelial cells from asthmatic subjects exposed to rhinovirus. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2011) 127(5):1148–1154.e9. 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.01.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Uller L, Leino M, Bedke N, Sammut D, Green B, Lau L, et al. Double-stranded RNA induces disproportionate expression of thymic stromal lymphopoietin versus interferon- in bronchial epithelial cells from donors with asthma. Thorax. (2010) 65(7):626–32. 10.1136/thx.2009.125930 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lee HC, Headley MB, Loo YM, Berlin A, Gale M, Debley JS, et al. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin is induced by respiratory syncytial virus–infected airway epithelial cells and promotes a type 2 response to infection. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2012) 130(5):1187–1196.e5. 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Williams TC, Loo SL, Nichol KS, Reid AT, Veerati PC, Esneau C, et al. IL-25 blockade augments antiviral immunity during respiratory virus infection. Commun Biol. (2022) 5(1):415. 10.1038/s42003-022-03367-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Gerla L, Moitra S, Pink D, Govindasamy N, Duchesne M, Reklow E, et al. SARS-CoV-2-Induced TSLP is associated with duration of hospital stay in COVID-19 patients. Viruses. (2023) 15(2):556. 10.3390/v15020556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Osei ET, Booth S, Hackett TL. What have in vitro co-culture models taught US about the contribution of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions to airway inflammation and remodeling in asthma? Cells. (2020) 9(7):1694. 10.3390/cells9071694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Beale J, Jayaraman A, Jackson DJ, Macintyre JDR, Edwards MR, Walton RP, et al. Rhinovirus-induced IL-25 in asthma exacerbation drives type 2 immunity and allergic pulmonary inflammation. Sci Transl Med. (2014) 6(256):256ra134. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Durrani SR, Montville DJ, Pratt AS, Sahu S, DeVries MK, Rajamanickam V, et al. Innate immune responses to rhinovirus are reduced by the high-affinity IgE receptor in allergic asthmatic children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2012) 130(2):489–95. 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.05.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Jackson DJ, Makrinioti H, Rana BMJ, Shamji BWH, Trujillo-Torralbo MB, Footitt J, et al. IL-33–Dependent type 2 inflammation during rhinovirus-induced asthma exacerbations In Vivo. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2014) 190(12):1373–82. 10.1164/rccm.201406-1039OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Jackson DJ, Johnston SL. The role of viruses in acute exacerbations of asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2010) 125(6):1178–87. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.04.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lee DDH, Petris A, Hynds RE, O’Callaghan C. Ciliated epithelial cell differentiation at air-liquid interface using commercially available culture Media. In: Turksen K, editor. Epidermal Cells. New York, NY: Springer US; (2019). p. 275–91. (Methods in Molecular Biology; vol. 2109). Available online at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/7651_2019_269 (cited September 30, 2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Thompson HGR, Mih JD, Krasieva TB, Tromberg BJ, George SC. Epithelial-derived TGF-β2 modulates basal and wound-healing subepithelial matrix homeostasis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. (2006) 291(6):L1277–85. 10.1152/ajplung.00057.2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.O’Sullivan MJ, Jang JH, Panariti A, Bedrat A, Ijpma G, Lemos B, et al. Airway epithelial cells drive airway smooth muscle cell phenotype switching to the proliferative and pro-inflammatory phenotype. Front Physiol. (2021) 12:687654. 10.3389/fphys.2021.687654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Blume C, Reale R, Held M, Loxham M, Millar TM, Collins JE, et al. Cellular crosstalk between airway epithelial and endothelial cells regulates barrier functions during exposure to double-stranded RNA: epithelial-endothelial crosstalk in human airways. ImmunInflamm Dis. (2017) 5(1):45–56. 10.1002/iid3.139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ronaghan NJ, Soo M, Pena U, Tellis M, Duan W, Tabatabaei-Zavareh N, et al. M1-like, but not M0- or M2-like, macrophages, reduce RSV infection of primary bronchial epithelial cells in a media-dependent fashion. PLoS One. (2022) 17(10):e0276013. 10.1371/journal.pone.0276013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Paplinska-Goryca M, Misiukiewicz-Stepien P, Proboszcz M, Nejman-Gryz P, Gorska K, Zajusz-Zubek E, et al. Interactions of nasal epithelium with macrophages and dendritic cells variously alter urban PM-induced inflammation in healthy, asthma and COPD. Sci Rep. (2021) 11(1):13259. 10.1038/s41598-021-92626-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Choe MM, Sporn PHS, Swartz MA. An in vitro airway wall model of remodeling. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. (2003) 285(2):L427–33. 10.1152/ajplung.00005.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Jornot L, Cordey S, Caruso A, Gerber C, Vukicevic M, Tapparel C, et al. T lymphocytes promote the antiviral and inflammatory responses of airway epithelial cells. PLoS One. (2011) 6(10):e26293. 10.1371/journal.pone.0026293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Luukkainen A, Puan KJ, Yusof N, Lee B, Tan KS, Liu J, et al. A co-culture model of PBMC and stem cell derived human nasal epithelium reveals rapid activation of NK and innate T cells upon influenza a virus infection of the nasal epithelium. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:2514. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Qin L, Hu Cp, Feng Jt, Xia Q. Activation of lymphocytes induced by bronchial epithelial cells with prolonged RSV infection. PLoS One. (2011) 6(12):e27113. 10.1371/journal.pone.0027113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Nawroth JC, Lucchesi C, Cheng D, Shukla A, Ngyuen J, Shroff T, et al. A microengineered airway lung chip models key features of viral-induced exacerbation of asthma. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. (2020) 63(5):591–600. 10.1165/rcmb.2020-0010MA [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Seo HR, Han HJ, Lee Y, Noh YW, Cho SJ, Kim JH. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived alveolar organoid with macrophages. IJMS. (2022) 23(16):9211. 10.3390/ijms23169211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kuo C, Choi S, Unen VV, Zhang H, Rustagi A, Alwahabi S, et al. Organoid modeling of lung-resident immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection. (2023). Available online at: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2870695/v1 (cited July 2, 2024).
- 81.Boser SR, Mauad T, Araújo-Paulino BBD, Mitchell I, Shrestha G, Chiu A, et al. Myofibroblasts are increased in the lung parenchyma in asthma. PLoS One. (2017) 12(8):e0182378. 10.1371/journal.pone.0182378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Reeves SR, Kang I, Chan CK, Barrow KA, Kolstad TK, White MP, et al. Asthmatic bronchial epithelial cells promote the establishment of a hyaluronan-enriched, leukocyte-adhesive extracellular matrix by lung fibroblasts. Respir Res. (2018) 19(1):146. 10.1186/s12931-018-0849-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Reeves SR, Barrow KA, Rich LM, White MP, Shubin NJ, Chan CK, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus infection of human lung fibroblasts induces a hyaluronan-enriched extracellular matrix that binds mast cells and enhances expression of mast cell proteases. Front Immunol. (2020) 10:3159. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Doeing DC, Solway J. Airway smooth muscle in the pathophysiology and treatment of asthma. J Appl Physiol. (2013) 114(7):834–43. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00950.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Allard B, Levardon H, Esteves P, Celle A, Maurat E, Thumerel M, et al. Asthmatic bronchial smooth muscle increases CCL5-dependent monocyte migration in response to rhinovirus-infected epithelium. Front Immunol. (2020) 10:2998. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Esteves P, Allard B, Celle A, Dupin I, Maurat E, Ousova O, et al. Asthmatic bronchial smooth muscle increases rhinovirus replication within the bronchial epithelium. Cell Rep. (2022) 38(13):110571. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Green CE, Turner AM. The role of the endothelium in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Respir Res. (2017) 18(1):20. 10.1186/s12931-017-0505-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Bordoni V, Mariotti D, Matusali G, Colavita F, Cimini E, Ippolito G, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection of airway epithelium triggers pulmonary endothelial cell activation and senescence associated with type I IFN production. Cells. (2022) 11(18):2912. 10.3390/cells11182912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Van Der Veen TA, De Groot LES, Melgert BN. The different faces of the macrophage in asthma. Curr Opin Pulm Med. (2020) 26(1):62–8. 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Message SD, Johnston SL. The immunology of virus infection in asthma. Eur Respir J. (2001) 18(6):1013–25. 10.1183/09031936.01.00228701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Draijer C, Boorsma CE, Robbe P, Timens W, Hylkema MN, Ten Hacken NH, et al. Human asthma is characterized by more IRF5+ M1 and CD206+ M2 macrophages and less IL-10+ M2-like macrophages around airways compared with healthy airways. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2017 Jul) 140(1):280–283.e3. 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.11.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Zdrenghea MT, Makrinioti H, Muresan A, Johnston SL, Stanciu LA. The role of macrophage IL-10/innate IFN interplay during virus-induced asthma. Rev Med Virol. (2015) 25(1):33–49. 10.1002/rmv.1817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Paplinska-Goryca M, Misiukiewicz-Stepien P, Nejman-Gryz P, Proboszcz M, Mlacki M, Gorska K, et al. Epithelial-macrophage-dendritic cell interactions impact alarmins expression in asthma and COPD. Clin Immunol. (2020) 215:108421. 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Gorska MM. Natural killer cells in asthma. Curr Opin Aller Clin Immunol. (2017) 17(1):50–4. 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Lepretre F, Gras D, Chanez P, Duez C. Natural killer cells in the lung: potential role in asthma and virus-induced exacerbation? Eur Respir Rev. (2023) 32(169):230036. 10.1183/16000617.0036-2023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Wei H, Zhang J, Xiao W, Feng J, Sun R, Tian Z. Involvement of human natural killer cells in asthma pathogenesis: natural killer 2 cells in type 2 cytokine predominance. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2005) 115(4):841–7. 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.11.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Chen YW, Huang SX, De Carvalho ALRT, Ho SH, Islam MN, Volpi S, et al. A three-dimensional model of human lung development and disease from pluripotent stem cells. Nat Cell Biol. (2017) 19(5):542–9. 10.1038/ncb3510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Gkatzis K, Taghizadeh S, Huh D, Stainier DYR, Bellusci S. Use of three-dimensional organoids and lung-on-a-chip methods to study lung development, regeneration and disease. Eur Respir J. (2018) 52(5):1800876. 10.1183/13993003.00876-2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Kong J, Wen S, Cao W, Yue P, Xu X, Zhang Y, et al. Lung organoids, useful tools for investigating epithelial repair after lung injury. Stem Cell Res Ther. (2021) 12(1):95. 10.1186/s13287-021-02172-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Li Y, Wu Q, Sun X, Shen J, Chen H. Organoids as a powerful model for respiratory diseases. Stem Cells Int. (2020) 2020:1–8. 10.1155/2020/5847876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Stroulios G, Brown T, Moreni G, Kondro D, Dei A, Eaves A, et al. Apical-out airway organoids as a platform for studying viral infections and screening for antiviral drugs. Sci Rep. (2022) 12(1):7673. 10.1038/s41598-022-11700-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Rajan A, Weaver AM, Aloisio GM, Jelinski J, Johnson HL, Venable SF, et al. The human nose organoid respiratory virus model: an Ex Vivo human challenge model to study respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pathogenesis and evaluate therapeutics. mBio. (2022) 13(1):e03511–21. 10.1128/mbio.03511-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Rijsbergen LC, Lamers MM, Comvalius AD, Koutstaal RW, Schipper D, Duprex WP, et al. Human respiratory syncytial virus subgroup A and B infections in nasal, bronchial, small-airway, and organoid-derived respiratory cultures. mSphere. (2021) 6(3):e00237–21. 10.1128/mSphere.00237-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Ekanger CT, Zhou F, Bohan D, Lotsberg ML, Ramnefjell M, Hoareau L, et al. Human organotypic airway and lung organoid cells of bronchiolar and alveolar differentiation are permissive to infection by influenza and SARS-CoV-2 respiratory virus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2022) 12:841447. 10.3389/fcimb.2022.841447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Lamers MM, Van Der Vaart J, Knoops K, Riesebosch S, Breugem TI, Mykytyn AZ, et al. An organoid-derived bronchioalveolar model for SARS-CoV-2 infection of human alveolar type II-like cells. EMBO J. (2021) 40(5):e105912. 10.15252/embj.2020105912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Ribó-Molina P, Van Nieuwkoop S, Mykytyn AZ, Van Run P, Lamers MM, Haagmans BL, et al. Human metapneumovirus infection of organoid-derived human bronchial epithelium represents cell tropism and cytopathology as observed in in vivo models. mSphere. (2024) 9(2):e00743–23. 10.1128/msphere.00743-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Porotto M, Ferren M, Chen YW, Siu Y, Makhsous N, Rima B, et al. Authentic modeling of human respiratory virus infection in human pluripotent stem cell-derived lung organoids. mBio. (2019) 10(3):e00723–19. 10.1128/mBio.00723-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Danahay H, Pessotti AD, Coote J, Montgomery BE, Xia D, Wilson A, et al. Notch2 is required for inflammatory cytokine-driven goblet cell metaplasia in the lung. Cell Rep. (2015) 10(2):239–52. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Pat Y, Rückert B, Ogulur I, Yazici D, Pérez-Diego M, Küçükkase OC, et al. Differentiation of bronchial epithelial spheroids in the presence of IL-13 recapitulates characteristic features of asthmatic airway epithelia. Allergy. (2022) 77(7):2229–33. 10.1111/all.15279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Bogoslowski A, An M, Penninger JM. Incorporating immune cells into organoid models: essential for studying human disease. Organoids. (2023) 2(3):140–55. 10.3390/organoids2030011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Ding S, Zhang H, Wang X. Microfluidic-Chip-Integrated biosensors for lung disease models. Biosensors. (2021) 11(11):456. 10.3390/bios11110456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Wang H, Yin F, Li Z, Su W, Li D. Advances of microfluidic lung chips for assessing atmospheric pollutants exposure. Environ Int. (2023) 172:107801. 10.1016/j.envint.2023.107801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Sengupta A, Dorn A, Jamshidi M, Schwob M, Hassan W, De Maddalena LL, et al. A multiplex inhalation platform to model in situ like aerosol delivery in a breathing lung-on-chip. Front Pharmacol. (2023) 14:1114739. 10.3389/fphar.2023.1114739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]