Abstract
Port catheters are widely used today due to increase in oncology cases, while they offer ease of use, they also bring various complications. These complications can range from simple issues to life-threatening ones. Port catheter fractures are rare complications, occurring in less than 1% of patients. The most common complaint in the present study was pain at the site of the subclavian vein puncture when fluid was administered from the port hub. Simple imaging such as chest X-rays can reveal the presence of the catheter fracture and migration. Pinch-off syndrome (POS) is one of the most significant causes of this condition. It is characterized by the catheter fracture compressed between the clavicle and the first rib. The incidence of POS ranges from 0.4% to 5%, with the clinical presentation varying widely from asymptomatic cases to serious complications such as cardiac arrhythmias, pulmonary embolism, or septic embolization. Early diagnosis is critical in preventing the life-threatening outcomes of POS. Diagnosis is usually made through imaging techniques such as chest X-rays, fluoroscopy, and thoracic computerized tomography (CT). Treatment of fracture due to POS typically involves the removal of catheter fragments using an endovascular technique, which offers lower morbidity compared to surgical methods. Prevention strategies include preferring internal jugular vein access over the subclavian vein, placing the subclavian entry point laterally, and performing regular imaging to detect POS symptoms early in the postprocedure period. This case series addresses case-based experiences where fractured port catheter fragments were successfully removed using endovascular methods also discussing the diagnostic and treatment process.
Keywords: Catheter fracture, Endovascular removal, Migration, Pinch off syndrome, Port catheter
Introduction
Port catheters are frequently used in hematology and oncology clinics for administering chemotherapy through a central venous route. In this group of patients, the frequent use of peripheral venous routes often leads to thrombosis or thrombophlebitis, rendering peripheral venous routes unusable. Moreover, the extravasation of cytotoxic drugs can lead to skin ulcers and dermatitis. Port catheters are also used for patients with short bowel syndrome, who require frequent total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Other indications for port catheters are frequent blood draws, the administration of irritating or caustic medications other than chemotherapy agents, blood transfusion, palliative care, immunosuppressive therapies and some invasive diagnostic procedures. In general, port catheters are preferred in situations where long-term venous access is needed, particularly when repeated peripheral vein access would be difficult, painful, or lead to complications like thrombophlebitis [1].
Various complications can arise during the insertion of port catheters. Complications related to the skin include wound infection and especially in cachectic patients, ulceration of the port chamber on the skin. Complications during the procedure may also include pneumothorax due to damage to the visceral pleura, hemothorax due to vascular injury, misplacement of the catheter into the internal jugular, opposite innominate vein/subclavian vein instead of the right atrium, or, though very rarely, placement into the internal mammary artery and incorrect catheter positioning due to improper fluoroscopic technique. One of the most serious complications which can occur during the procedure is the catheter dislodging from the vein and being placed in the corresponding hemithorax. In this case, it is common to observe the development of dyspnea and hemothorax after fluid administration. Complications seen after the port catheter placement include catheter breakage, catheter dysfunction or occlusion, and venous thrombosis, stenosis, or occlusion. Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is one of the most serious delayed complications related to catheter placement, leading to significant morbidity and mortality [1,2].
Catheter fracture and migration, which is the subject of our study, is a rare clinical scenario that is one of the most serious complications seen in the late stages. Factors that can cause catheter fracture and migration, include: increased pressure within the catheter during flushing with a syringe, leading to catheter fracture. This is more common at the junction between the port chamber and the catheter. External pressure is another cause. This may occur due to sudden compression from a seatbelt or for a similar reason. A third cause is the “Pinch-off Syndrome(POS)”, which occurs when the catheter is compressed between the first rib and the clavicle. The fourth cause is the structure of the catheters themselves where fractures are more common in catheters made from poorly manufactured materials [[1], [2], [3]].
Catheter fractures due to POS are rare complications occurring in 1% of patients. This rare complication, first reported 35 years ago, is still seen in 1% of patients with a port catheter [4]. POS occurs in patients with port catheters placed in the subclavian vein using an infraclavicular approach. This condition is caused by the narrow space between the clavicle and the first rib, which leads to mechanical compression and shearing forces on the catheter [5]. The subclavian vein passes through a narrow costoclavicular space surrounded by rigid structures such as the costoclavicular and costocoracoid ligaments. The wear and compression caused by movements in nearby joints can damage the catheter [4]. Additionally, narrowing of this space can also occur due to postural variations. The catheter is typically placed in a supine position; however, during movements in standing position and with additional load on the shoulder, this space narrows even further [6]. The objective grading of POS by Hinke et al. classified compression in the subclavian vein catheter as grade 0 (no compression along the catheter), grade 1 (a sudden change in the catheter path without luminal narrowing), grade 2 (luminal narrowing, the true sign of pinch-off), and grade 3 (complete catheter disconnection) [7]. Prevention of POS is possible by choosing the internal jugular vein for port catheter access. If the subclavian vein is selected for catheter access, the catheter entry point should be placed laterally in the costoclavicular space rather than medially. Especially in standing chest X-rays, POS should be sought after the port is placed. If detected, removal of the port should be considered [6]. In the present study we discuss 3 cases of grade 3 POS and endovascular management of this life-threating complication.
Case presentations
Case #1: A 42 year old female patient was referred by our thoracic surgeon for removal of broken port catheter through an endovascular approach. The patient was diagnosed with bilateral breast cancer 2 years prior. A catheter insertion was performed twenty months prior from the right subclavian vein by our thoracic surgery team to administer chemotherapeutic agents and for blood sampling. Eight months after port placement, it was noted that blood was no longer drawn out of the catheter. To review the catheter, a chest X-ray was performed. This revealed that port catheter was broken from first rib and clavicle region due to POS and that a fractured fragment migrated to the right atrium and right ventricule (Fig. 1). Pinch off Syndrome was suspected given the fracture location. A CT scan was performed to review the port catheter (Fig. 2). After informed consent was obtained, using aseptic measures, a 10 F (French) vascular introducer sheath was placed in the right jugular vein. A 5F snare catheter (AndraSnare®) was introduced from the vascular sheath and after several attempts the proximal end of the fractured port catheter was pulled inside the snare and gradually moved through the sheath (Fig. 3). After removal of the vascular sheath, homestasis was secured by manual compression. No immediate post procedure complication was noted. A control chest x-ray showed no fractured intra-cardiac catheter (Fig. 4).
Fig. 1.
Chest X-ray of case #1 showing fractured and migrated port catheter distal segment to right ventricule (red arrow).
Fig. 2.
Multi-planar reconstructive CT image of case #1 confirming fractured and migrated port catheter to right ventricule (red arrow).
Fig. 3.
Snare catheter grapping the proximal end of the fractured port catheter from right jugular approach for the case#1 (red arrow).
Fig. 4.
Control chest X-ray of case #1 showing removed fractured port catheter from right ventricule.
Case #2: A 71 year old female patient was referred by our thoracic surgeon for removal of broken port catheter through an endovascular approach. The patient was diagnosed with right side breast cancer 5 months prior. A port catheter insertion was performed 3 months prior from the left subclavian vein by our thoracic surgery team to administer chemotherapeutic agents and for blood sampling. One month after port placement, it was noted that the patient complained of chest pain during chemotheraphy administration. To review the catheter, a chest X-ray was performed and revealed that the port catheter was broken from the first rib and clavicle region due to POS and that a fractured fragment had migrated to the right atrium (Fig. 5). After informed consent was obtained, using aseptic measures, a 10 F vascular introducer sheath was placed in the right jugular vein. A 5F snare catheter (AndraSnare®) was introduced from the vascular sheath and despite many attempts the port catheter could not be secured from the jugular vein so another venous access was performed trough the subclavian vein with the same size vascular sheath. This time the proximal end of the fractured port catheter was secured and was eventually removed through the sheath (Fig. 6). After removal of the vascular sheath, homestasis was secured by manual compression. No immediate post procedure complication was noted and a control chest x-ray showed no fractured intra-cardiac catheter (Fig. 7).
Fig. 5.
Chest X-ray of case #2 showing fractured and migrated port catheter distal segment to right atrium (red arrows).
Fig. 6.
Snare catheter grapping the proximal end of the fractured port catheter from left subclavian approach for the case#2 (red arrow).
Fig. 7.
Control chest X-ray of case #2 showing removed fractured port catheter from right atrium.
Case #3: A 48 year old female patient was referred by our thoracic surgeon for removal of broken port catheter through an endovascular approach. The patient was diagnosed with right side breast cancer 8 years prior. A port catheter insertion was performed from the left subclavian vein by our thoracic surgery team to administer chemotherapeutic agents and for blood sampling. Four years after port catheter placement the patient complained of chest pain during chemotheraphy administration. An X-ray was performed and revealed that the port catheter was broken from the first rib and clavicle region due to POS and fractured fragments migrated to the right atrium (Fig. 8). After obtaining informed consent, a 10 F vascular introducer sheath was inserted from the left femoral vein. A 5F snare catheter (AndraSnare®) was introduced from the vascular sheath and despite many attempts, the port catheter could not be secured. 5F vascular sheath was placed from the right femoral vein and from there a 5F pig-tail catheter was introduced and placed to the right atrium to stabilise the moving port catheter due to heart beats (Fig. 9). The distal end of the fractured port catheter was secured and the port catheter was removed through the femoral vascular sheath (Fig. 10). After removing the vascular sheath, homestasis was secured by manual compression. No immediate post procedure complication was noted.
Fig. 8.
Chest X-ray of case #3 showing fractured and migrated port catheter distal segment to right atrium (red arrows).
Fig. 9.
Snare catheter grapping the distal end of the fractured port catheter (red arrow) with the help of pig tail catheter (blue arrow) with the femoral vein approach for the case#3.
Fig. 10.
Snare catheter grapping the distal end of the fractured port catheter and retracting from left femoral vein (red arrow) with the help of pig tail catheter (blue arrow) advanced from right femoral vein for case #3.
Discussion
Port catheters play an increasingly important role in the management of cancer patients and patients with chronic diseases who require long-term intravenous therapy. Despite the clinical benefits they provide, these devices can lead to complications that seriously threaten patient safety. These complications must be managed quickly and effectively. Catheter fracture and migration is among the most critical complications. Although this complication occurs with a frequency of less than 0.4%, it can lead to life-threatening arrhythmias, cardiac tamponade, and embolization [8]. There are many causes of port fracture including mechanical stress, prolonged use of catheters, errors during placement or maintenance and POS (compression between the first rib and the clavicle) [9]. Migration of catheter fragments to critical areas, such as the right atrium or ventricle, can result in severe complications. These complications may include arrhythmias, myocardial perforation, and embolization in the pulmonary artery, which can lead to fatal outcomes including cardiac arrest or pulmonary embolism [10]. Skórniak et al. [11] reported the successful endovascular removal of catheter fragments after migration and emphasized the importance of interdisciplinary cooperation in managing such emergencies. Advances in interventional radiology play a significant role in managing this complication. Percutaneous removal procedures using snares or other endovascular devices have achieved high success rates with minimal complications. Azeemuddin et al. [12] report the successful removal of a fractured port catheter from the right atrium using a snare in a resource-limited setting, highlighting the potential of innovative solutions. The use of imaging methods such as fluoroscopy and ultrasound during placement, along with follow-up chest radiographs, can help to ensure proper placement and detect potential problems. Additionally, regularly flushing the catheter with heparinized saline is an effective method for preventing thrombus formation [13]. The development of more durable catheter materials should be investigated to provide resistance to long-term use and mechanical trauma. Furthermore, establishing standard protocols for catheter placement, maintenance, and complication management will improve patient outcomes.
In conclusion, with the increasing prevalence of cancer and chronic diseases, the use of venous port devices is rising. Healthcare systems should prioritize training healthcare personnel and invest in resources that support prevention and intervention processes. While catheter fracture and migration are rare, they represent serious clinical issues that require rapid diagnosis and effective management. Advanced interventional techniques are crucial in minimising risks and improving patient outcomes in such cases. The reviewed cases highlight the critical role of interdisciplinary collaboration and underscore the need for continuous innovation in addressing the complex issues related to complications arising from central venous access devices.
Patient consent
Written and verbal informed consent was obtained from all patients involved in the case report for publication purposes.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
The author is an Editorial Board Member/Editor-in-Chief/Associate Editor/Guest Editor for this journal and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article.
Acknowledgments: No grants for this study.
References
- 1.Rupp S.M., Apfelbaum J.L., Blitt C., Caplan R.A., Connis R.T., Domino K.B., et al. Practice guidelines for central venous access, a report by the american society of anesthesiologists task force on central venous access. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:539–573. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823c9569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kausche S., Nagel S.N., Teichgräber U. Interventional radiological imaging and treatment of port catheter dysfunctions [Article in German] Rofo. 2011;183:260–266. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lukito A.A., Pranata R., Huang I., Thengker A., Wirawan M. Fracture of the port catheter and migration into the coronary sinus: case report and brief review of the literature. Clin Med Insights: Case Rep. 2019;12 doi: 10.1177/1179547619832282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aitken D.R., Minton J.P. The “pinch-off sign”: a warning of impending problems with permanent subclavian catheters. Am J Surg. 1984;148(5):633–636. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90340-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chuah J.S., Wong W.L., Bakin S., Lim R.Z.M., Lee E.P., et al. Pinch-off syndrome from a chemoport catheter successfully managed with endovascular retrieval. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2021;65 doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lakshmi H.N., Sharma M., Jain A., Puj K., Jayaprakash D., Pandya S. Chemoport fracture due to catheter pinch off syndrome: a rare complication of subclavian vein approach revisited. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2022;13(2):343–347. doi: 10.1007/s13193-021-01459-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hinke D.H., Zandt-Stastny D.A., Goodman L.R., Quebbeman E.J., Krzywda E.A., Andris D.A. Pinch-off syndrome: a complication of implantable subclavian venous access devices. Radiology. 1990;177(2):353–356. doi: 10.1148/radiology.177.2.2217768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Deep S., Deshpande S., Howe P. Traumatic fracture of central venous catheter resulting in potential migration of distal fragment: a case report. Cases J. 2008;1(1):394. doi: 10.1186/1757-1626-1-394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jahya A.N., Adiputra P.A.T. Evaluation of the use of totally implantable venous access port for chemotherapy in breast cancer patients at Sanglah Central General Hospital in 2016. Udayana Med J. 2020;9(4):45–51. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Machat S., Eisenhuber E., Pfarl G., Stübler J., Koelblinger C., Zacherl J., et al. Complications of central venous port systems: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2019;86:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0770-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Skórniak J., Wierzbicki J., Ziętek M., Milnerowicz A., Matkowski R. Two cases of port catheter migration to the right ventricle: is it a rare complication in patients with cancer? Pol Arch Intern Med. 2023;133(6):16497. doi: 10.20452/pamw.16497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Azeemuddin M., Khan A., Ansari I., Shahid J., Khan F., Haq T.U., et al. Percutaneous endovascular removal of a broken port-a-catheter from right atrium using manual made snare. Radiol Case Rep. 2022;17(7):2437–2440. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.01.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ko S.Y., Park S.C., Hwang J.K., Kim S.D. Spontaneous fracture and migration of catheter of a totally implantable venous access port via internal jugular vein-a case report. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;11:1–4. doi: 10.1186/s13019-016-0450-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]










